SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Dave Princep, Matthew Owers
How to sort the mineralisation from the background
  – Processing of radiometric logging data

IAEA Sandstone Conference
May 2012
• Introduction

• Modification factors

• Deconvolution

• Disequilibrium

• Comparison to Assays

• Calibration

• Data processing




                         1
Paladin



      • Top 10 Uranium producer, currently 8th

      • 2 producing mines, Namibia and Malawi

      • Significant investment in exploration on 3 continents

      • Approximately 566Mlb U3O8 attributable mineral resources

      • Logging in excess of 1,000,000m per year




                                                                   2
Background


         • The background is considered to be the counts per
         second read in the absence of uranium mineralisation

         • Instrument will register counts as a result of small but
         widespread concentrations of various radioelements,
         cosmic rays and radon in the atmosphere

         • The local background is dependent on the local
         geology (soil, basalt, granite etc.) and may vary down
         the hole

         • Background effects need to be removed prior to the
         conversion of counts per second to an equivalent
         uranium grade
Background


    200

    180

    160

    140

    120

    100

    80                                                Hole 1
    60

    40

    20
                                                          Hole 2
      0
          0   10   20   30   40   50   60   70   80       90
                                                               Hole 3100




                                                                           4
Casing

     • The effect of drill casing on logged counts per second, the blue trace has
     been logged open hole, the red trace has been logged in rods.
     •Casing factors need to be determined at the start of every drilling programme
     and when the rod string is changed.
Radon
 • The effect of either gaseous or dissolved Radon within a drill hole can be both variable
 down the hole and arbitrary in value.

 • The red trace shows the drill hole as originally logged showing highly variable apparent
 background (both locally and along the length of the hole), the blue trace shows the hole
 logged at a later date.

 •Some drill holes are known to exhibit a diurnal variation in apparent Radon effect
Radon

    • Detailed view of the previous trace showing background shift due to
    Radon, in the red trace, at the interface with the water table.

    • In this case the contribution to counts per second due to Radon is between
    60 and 250 additional cps.
Deconvolution

     • The downhole radiometric log is deconvolved prior to use in order to confine
     the mineralised intervals to the correct spatial position in regards to thickness .

     • Whilst in normal practice, radiometric logs output information in small down
     hole increments (usually 5 or 10cm) the gamma rays being counted come from
     a significantly larger area.

     • The result of this is that the apparent peak of mineralisation will be wider than
     occurs in reality. This can be seen most easily in the slope in the sides of the
     calibration logs – in this instance there is a very sharp, perpendicular boundary
     between mineralised and barren material which is not accurately honoured.

     •Deconvolution is a mathematical process performed on the down hole logs in
     order to ensure that the transitions from mineralised to un-mineralised material
     (and vice-versa) results in the true thickness of the mineralisation being
     determined.
Disequilibrium

  • The difference between the radiometrically derived grade and the assay grade.

  • Due to separation of uranium and it’s daughter products, normally due to removal of
  either uranium or daughters in solution.

  • Is considered positive when there is a higher concentration of uranium present compared
  to daughters.

  • Is considered negative when there is a lower concentration of uranium present compared
  to daughters.

  • Is spatially variable within deposits that exhibit disequilibrium.

  • Is normally only present where there is active re-distribution of uranium or daughter
  products and effect diminishes over geological time once re-distribution ceases.

  • Not all secondary uranium deposits exhibit disequilibrium as mineralisation may be
  geologically old and have reached equilibrium.




                                                                                              9
Disequilibrium

                                                URANIUM DECAY SERIES                                                                 Soluble and transportable
                     240

                     238                                                                                                 U238
                                                                                                                                     primary element
                                                                                                                       4.5 x 109 y
                                              URANIUM GROUP
                     236                                                                                         1.2 m
                                              (Relatively Soluble)
                                                                                                               Pa234
                     234                                                                        Th   234                 U234
                                                                                                24 d                   250,000 y
                     232

                     230                                                                                     Th230
                                                                                                            80,000 y
                     228

                     226
                                                                                                                                     Gaseous and easily
                                          RADIUM GROUP                                     Ra226
       MASS NUMBER




                     224
                                          (98% of Gamma                                  1602 y                                      removable daughter
                                           Radiation)                              Gas
                                                                                         ROAC, Track Etch, Alpha Card,
                     222                                                      Rn222      Alpha Tube and Emanometers
                                                                                3.8 d
                     220

                     218                  Po218                         As218                                   LEGEND               Stable majority gamma
                                          3m                            2s                                 Type of Decay
                                                                                                                                     emitters detected by
                                                            m
                                                     20




                     216                         2   14
                                                Bi                           Scintillometers,
                                                                                                                                     scintillometers
                     214         Pb214                          Po214        Spectrometers,
                                  27 m                          160 s        Borehole Probes
                                                y
                                              21




                     212                  21
                                            0
                                                     21
                                                        0

                                         Pb        Bi                                                         Principal Gamma
                                                          d
                                                     5




                                                                                                              Emitters
                     210 Tl210                                  Po210
                           1m                                   138 d
                                                                                                              24 d - Half lives
                     208
                                                                                                              Scintillometers
                     206                  Pb206                                                                  Instruments used
                            Tl   206                                                                             for Detection
                                         stable
                            4m
                     204
                           80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94
                                          ATOMIC NUMBER




                                                                                                                                                                 10
Comparison to Assays
  • In order to both confirm the validity of the downhole radiometrically derived grades as
  well as determine if any disequilibrium is present within the mineralised body a comparison
  to conventionally derived assay grades is normally undertaken.

  • During the drilling programme a statistically representative number of samples are taken
  from drill cuttings (these may be RC chips, cut drill core or similar).

  • The samples are processed through a laboratory with all appropriate QAQC procedures
  maintained (duplicates, blanks, certified standards etc) in order to maintain the accuracy
  and precision of the results for the final comparison.

  • During this process material is sampled from the mineralised zones as well as the non
  mineralised areas either side of mineralisation (at least 2-3m).

  • Whilst comparisons to radiometric grades (following application of all correction factors)
  can be undertaken on a metre by metre basis, variations in sampled down hole position
  normally means this method is unreliable.

  • Radiometric grades and sampled intervals should be composited to the entire
  mineralised interval plus 2-3m either side to allow for any variation in actual down hole
  position.
Comparison to Assays

        5,000
                                                                                                    Comparison of gamma data
        4,500
                                                                                                    against assay values on a
        4,000
                                                                                                    metre by metre
                                                                                    y = 0.964x      basis, deposit and rock
        3,500                                                                                       type are known to exhibit a
                                                                                                    level of disequilibrium.
        3,000

                                                                                                    Note the scatter of data
Assay




        2,500
                                                                                                    points and the lack of
        2,000                                                                                       correlation. Based on 511
                                                                                                    samples.
        1,500


        1,000


         500


           0
                0   500   1,000   1,500   2,000    2,500   3,000   3,500   4,000   4,500    5,000
                                                  Gamma




                                                                                                                                  12
Comparison to Assays

        5,000
                                                                                                       The same base data but now
        4,500                                                                                          composited to mineralised
        4,000
                                                                                                       intervals (as deposit is
                                                                                                       layered normal additional un-
        3,500                                                                                          mineralised areas cannot be
                                                                                                       included in this example).
        3,000

                                                                                                       Note the correlation of data
Assay




        2,500
                                                                                                       points. Minimum thickness for
        2,000                                                                                          a composite is 3m, average is
                                          y = 1.137x
                                                                                                       6.39m and is based on 71
        1,500
                                                                                                       drill holes.
        1,000
                                                                                                       Additional analysis of the data
         500                                                                                           points to an effective
                                                                                                       disequilibrium factor of
           0
                                                                                                       approximately 1.17
                0   500   1,000   1,500   2,000        2,500   3,000   3,500   4,000   4,500   5,000
                                                  Gamma




                                                                                                                                    13
Comparison to Assays



  • It is unlikely that the comparison between radiometrically derived grades will be
  exact, however, in the absence of significant disequilibrium the basic comparison should
  be within 5% between the two.

  • This basic discrepancy may be due to a number of factors (formation factor, drill hole
  size issues etc) but can be normally collected together as a residual factor.

  • It should be noted that the comparison is between two processes that derive their values
  from fundamentally different sources – the drilling derived sample and the radiometric
  value for everything else except the drilling sample. There is a significant volume
  difference (and therefore potential variability) between the sampling methods – drilling is
  usually in the region of 10cm diameter and radiometric logging is up to 1m diameter and
  specifically excludes the drilled portion.




                                                                                                14
Calibration
                              Probe Calibration at Kayelekera
 3500


                                                                                                                 Probes are calibrated
 3150                                                                    Kayelekera Pit
                                                                                                                 against known thicknesses
                                                                         Active Layer Thickness = 1.02 m
                                                                         Hole Diameter = 110 mm                  and grades of
 2800                                                                    Hole Fluid = air
                                                                                                                 mineralisation in order to
 2450
                                                                         Probe T360                              determine a K-factor, a
                                                                         Run 1                                   constant value to convert
 2100                                                                    Run 2
                                                                                                                 logged counts per second
                                                                         Run 3
                                                                         Run 4
                                                                                                                 to an equivalent uranium
 1750

                                                                                                                 grade.
 1400


                                                                                                                 The log to the left shows 4
 1050
                                                                                                                 logging runs at the newly
                                                                                                                 commissioned primary
  700

                                                                                                                 calibration facility at the
  350                                                                                                            Kayelekera Minesite.

   0
        0   0.2   0.4   0.6   0.8   1   1.2    1.4       1.6   1.8   2          2.2     2.4      2.6       2.8

                                        Depth (metres)
Calibration (Pelindaba, South Africa)
                            Probe Calibration at Pelindaba
 4500


                                                                                                        Calibration pits are constructed
                                                               Calibration Pit: Pelindaba
 4000                                                                                                   as a layer of barren material at
                                                                   Grade = 1440 ppm
                                                                   Thickness = 0.86 m                   the base, a layer of mineralised
                                                                   Hole Diameter = 100 mm
 3500
                                                                   Hole Fluid = air                     material with a known grade
                                                                                                        and thickness, and another
                                                                   Probe A775
 3000
                                                                                                        layer of barren material at the
                                                                   Probe T244
                                                                   Probe S093                           top.
 2500

                                                                   Probe T362

 2000
                                                                   Probe 005                            The diameter of the
                                                                   Probe T279                           construction is such that an
 1500
                                                                                                        apparent ‘infinite’ width can be
                                                                                                        seen by the logging equipment.
 1000


                                                                                                        The recent transportation of the
 500
                                                                                                        test pits at Pelindaba has
                                                                                                        resulted in damage as indicated
   0
    0.2   0.4   0.6   0.8    1    1.2       1.4    1.6   1.8   2          2.2     2.4       2.6   2.8   by the accompanying log.
                                        Depth (metres)
Calibration



 Recently constructed full
 calibration facility at the
 Kayelekera mine, the
 photograph shows the top
 surface of the facility with
 cased holes of various
 diameter.

 The covered pipe at the
 rear of the pad is a
 temporary termination for
 the moisture monitoring
 equipment.
Calibration check facility, LHU



   Individual historic test pits
   at LHU refurbished to allow
   for more frequent
   calibration checks.

   A full calibration
   facility, similar to that at
   Kayelekera, is currently
   being constructed at LHU
   to replace the Gencor pits.




                                   18
Sensitivity Checks

 Probes are checked for instrument
 drift using a standardised rig and
 radioactive source.
 All probes are checked before use
 for exploration, before each shift
 for mining and at least once a
 week when not in normal use.
 If excessive drift is identified the
 probe is sent for re-calibration or
 repair.
 Probe status is monitored by
 dedicated staff at all sites (mining
 and exploration), in addition a
 report is issued by the geophysical
 department in Perth each month
 detailing the calibration and
 standardisation status of all probes




                                        19
Sensitivity checks




                                 Probe returned to service




    Probe re-calibrated   Probe damaged and sent for
    following excessive   repair and calibration
    drift




                                                             20
Logging equipment


   Logging
   equipment, standard
   Auslog winch and DLS
   with custom made boom
   and winch enclosure
   mounted on Yamaha
   Rhino 4x4 base. Electrics
   currently upgraded to
   Solar power for battery re-
   charge.

   Gamma probes, 33mm
   slimline, with primary
   calibration at Pelindaba.
Rhino service facility



  All Rhino based
  equipment is
  serviced and
  maintained on site.

  Service facility also
  contains a low
  background area
  for shift based
  probe sensitivity
  checks.




                          22
Data Processing


   Data from the
   logging process is
   downloaded at the
   end of each shift or
   drill hole and
   processed to las
   files.

   Data is then
   combined in a
   custom Access
   database where all
   calibrations and
   corrections are
   applied




                          23
Questions?




             24

More Related Content

More from Monatom Mgl

Iaea
IaeaIaea
4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хууль
4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хууль4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хууль
4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хуульMonatom Mgl
 
12.компанийн тухай хууль
12.компанийн тухай хууль12.компанийн тухай хууль
12.компанийн тухай хуульMonatom Mgl
 
11.газрын тухай хууль
11.газрын тухай хууль11.газрын тухай хууль
11.газрын тухай хуульMonatom Mgl
 
10.газрын тухай хууль
10.газрын тухай хууль10.газрын тухай хууль
10.газрын тухай хуульMonatom Mgl
 
9.төрийн хяналт шалгалтын тухай хууль
9.төрийн хяналт шалгалтын тухай хууль9.төрийн хяналт шалгалтын тухай хууль
9.төрийн хяналт шалгалтын тухай хуульMonatom Mgl
 
7.аж ахуйн үйл ажиллагааны тусгай зөвшөөрлийн тухай хууль
7.аж ахуйн үйл ажиллагааны тусгай зөвшөөрлийн тухай хууль7.аж ахуйн үйл ажиллагааны тусгай зөвшөөрлийн тухай хууль
7.аж ахуйн үйл ажиллагааны тусгай зөвшөөрлийн тухай хуульMonatom Mgl
 
6.усны тухай хууль
6.усны тухай хууль6.усны тухай хууль
6.усны тухай хуульMonatom Mgl
 
5.ашигт малтмалын хуулинд нэмэлт өөрчлөлт оруулах тухай хууль
5.ашигт малтмалын хуулинд нэмэлт өөрчлөлт оруулах тухай хууль5.ашигт малтмалын хуулинд нэмэлт өөрчлөлт оруулах тухай хууль
5.ашигт малтмалын хуулинд нэмэлт өөрчлөлт оруулах тухай хуульMonatom Mgl
 
4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хууль
4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хууль4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хууль
4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хуульMonatom Mgl
 
3.цөмийн зэвсгээс ангид байх тухай хууль
3.цөмийн зэвсгээс ангид байх тухай хууль3.цөмийн зэвсгээс ангид байх тухай хууль
3.цөмийн зэвсгээс ангид байх тухай хуульMonatom Mgl
 
1.цөмийн энергийн тухай хууль
1.цөмийн энергийн тухай хууль1.цөмийн энергийн тухай хууль
1.цөмийн энергийн тухай хуульMonatom Mgl
 
13.тэмдэгтийн хураамжийн тухай хууль
13.тэмдэгтийн хураамжийн тухай хууль13.тэмдэгтийн хураамжийн тухай хууль
13.тэмдэгтийн хураамжийн тухай хуульMonatom Mgl
 
03 iaea conference becker
03 iaea conference becker03 iaea conference becker
03 iaea conference becker
Monatom Mgl
 
Tm on origin of sandston uranium deposits
Tm on origin of sandston uranium depositsTm on origin of sandston uranium deposits
Tm on origin of sandston uranium deposits
Monatom Mgl
 
Summary.conclusion.u.sandstone.tm
Summary.conclusion.u.sandstone.tmSummary.conclusion.u.sandstone.tm
Summary.conclusion.u.sandstone.tm
Monatom Mgl
 
Session 8 02 a.d. sklodowska
Session 8 02 a.d. sklodowskaSession 8 02 a.d. sklodowska
Session 8 02 a.d. sklodowska
Monatom Mgl
 
Tmus programme
Tmus programmeTmus programme
Tmus programme
Monatom Mgl
 
04 poland sandstone deposits - iaea 2012
04 poland sandstone deposits - iaea 201204 poland sandstone deposits - iaea 2012
04 poland sandstone deposits - iaea 2012
Monatom Mgl
 

More from Monatom Mgl (20)

Iaea
IaeaIaea
Iaea
 
Scan
ScanScan
Scan
 
4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хууль
4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хууль4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хууль
4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хууль
 
12.компанийн тухай хууль
12.компанийн тухай хууль12.компанийн тухай хууль
12.компанийн тухай хууль
 
11.газрын тухай хууль
11.газрын тухай хууль11.газрын тухай хууль
11.газрын тухай хууль
 
10.газрын тухай хууль
10.газрын тухай хууль10.газрын тухай хууль
10.газрын тухай хууль
 
9.төрийн хяналт шалгалтын тухай хууль
9.төрийн хяналт шалгалтын тухай хууль9.төрийн хяналт шалгалтын тухай хууль
9.төрийн хяналт шалгалтын тухай хууль
 
7.аж ахуйн үйл ажиллагааны тусгай зөвшөөрлийн тухай хууль
7.аж ахуйн үйл ажиллагааны тусгай зөвшөөрлийн тухай хууль7.аж ахуйн үйл ажиллагааны тусгай зөвшөөрлийн тухай хууль
7.аж ахуйн үйл ажиллагааны тусгай зөвшөөрлийн тухай хууль
 
6.усны тухай хууль
6.усны тухай хууль6.усны тухай хууль
6.усны тухай хууль
 
5.ашигт малтмалын хуулинд нэмэлт өөрчлөлт оруулах тухай хууль
5.ашигт малтмалын хуулинд нэмэлт өөрчлөлт оруулах тухай хууль5.ашигт малтмалын хуулинд нэмэлт өөрчлөлт оруулах тухай хууль
5.ашигт малтмалын хуулинд нэмэлт өөрчлөлт оруулах тухай хууль
 
4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хууль
4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хууль4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хууль
4.ашигт малтмалын тухай хууль
 
3.цөмийн зэвсгээс ангид байх тухай хууль
3.цөмийн зэвсгээс ангид байх тухай хууль3.цөмийн зэвсгээс ангид байх тухай хууль
3.цөмийн зэвсгээс ангид байх тухай хууль
 
1.цөмийн энергийн тухай хууль
1.цөмийн энергийн тухай хууль1.цөмийн энергийн тухай хууль
1.цөмийн энергийн тухай хууль
 
13.тэмдэгтийн хураамжийн тухай хууль
13.тэмдэгтийн хураамжийн тухай хууль13.тэмдэгтийн хураамжийн тухай хууль
13.тэмдэгтийн хураамжийн тухай хууль
 
03 iaea conference becker
03 iaea conference becker03 iaea conference becker
03 iaea conference becker
 
Tm on origin of sandston uranium deposits
Tm on origin of sandston uranium depositsTm on origin of sandston uranium deposits
Tm on origin of sandston uranium deposits
 
Summary.conclusion.u.sandstone.tm
Summary.conclusion.u.sandstone.tmSummary.conclusion.u.sandstone.tm
Summary.conclusion.u.sandstone.tm
 
Session 8 02 a.d. sklodowska
Session 8 02 a.d. sklodowskaSession 8 02 a.d. sklodowska
Session 8 02 a.d. sklodowska
 
Tmus programme
Tmus programmeTmus programme
Tmus programme
 
04 poland sandstone deposits - iaea 2012
04 poland sandstone deposits - iaea 201204 poland sandstone deposits - iaea 2012
04 poland sandstone deposits - iaea 2012
 

01 12.05.27 iaea conf princep compress

  • 1. Dave Princep, Matthew Owers How to sort the mineralisation from the background – Processing of radiometric logging data IAEA Sandstone Conference May 2012
  • 2. • Introduction • Modification factors • Deconvolution • Disequilibrium • Comparison to Assays • Calibration • Data processing 1
  • 3. Paladin • Top 10 Uranium producer, currently 8th • 2 producing mines, Namibia and Malawi • Significant investment in exploration on 3 continents • Approximately 566Mlb U3O8 attributable mineral resources • Logging in excess of 1,000,000m per year 2
  • 4. Background • The background is considered to be the counts per second read in the absence of uranium mineralisation • Instrument will register counts as a result of small but widespread concentrations of various radioelements, cosmic rays and radon in the atmosphere • The local background is dependent on the local geology (soil, basalt, granite etc.) and may vary down the hole • Background effects need to be removed prior to the conversion of counts per second to an equivalent uranium grade
  • 5. Background 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 Hole 1 60 40 20 Hole 2 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Hole 3100 4
  • 6. Casing • The effect of drill casing on logged counts per second, the blue trace has been logged open hole, the red trace has been logged in rods. •Casing factors need to be determined at the start of every drilling programme and when the rod string is changed.
  • 7. Radon • The effect of either gaseous or dissolved Radon within a drill hole can be both variable down the hole and arbitrary in value. • The red trace shows the drill hole as originally logged showing highly variable apparent background (both locally and along the length of the hole), the blue trace shows the hole logged at a later date. •Some drill holes are known to exhibit a diurnal variation in apparent Radon effect
  • 8. Radon • Detailed view of the previous trace showing background shift due to Radon, in the red trace, at the interface with the water table. • In this case the contribution to counts per second due to Radon is between 60 and 250 additional cps.
  • 9. Deconvolution • The downhole radiometric log is deconvolved prior to use in order to confine the mineralised intervals to the correct spatial position in regards to thickness . • Whilst in normal practice, radiometric logs output information in small down hole increments (usually 5 or 10cm) the gamma rays being counted come from a significantly larger area. • The result of this is that the apparent peak of mineralisation will be wider than occurs in reality. This can be seen most easily in the slope in the sides of the calibration logs – in this instance there is a very sharp, perpendicular boundary between mineralised and barren material which is not accurately honoured. •Deconvolution is a mathematical process performed on the down hole logs in order to ensure that the transitions from mineralised to un-mineralised material (and vice-versa) results in the true thickness of the mineralisation being determined.
  • 10. Disequilibrium • The difference between the radiometrically derived grade and the assay grade. • Due to separation of uranium and it’s daughter products, normally due to removal of either uranium or daughters in solution. • Is considered positive when there is a higher concentration of uranium present compared to daughters. • Is considered negative when there is a lower concentration of uranium present compared to daughters. • Is spatially variable within deposits that exhibit disequilibrium. • Is normally only present where there is active re-distribution of uranium or daughter products and effect diminishes over geological time once re-distribution ceases. • Not all secondary uranium deposits exhibit disequilibrium as mineralisation may be geologically old and have reached equilibrium. 9
  • 11. Disequilibrium URANIUM DECAY SERIES Soluble and transportable 240 238 U238 primary element 4.5 x 109 y URANIUM GROUP 236 1.2 m (Relatively Soluble) Pa234 234 Th 234 U234 24 d 250,000 y 232 230 Th230 80,000 y 228 226 Gaseous and easily RADIUM GROUP Ra226 MASS NUMBER 224 (98% of Gamma 1602 y removable daughter Radiation) Gas ROAC, Track Etch, Alpha Card, 222 Rn222 Alpha Tube and Emanometers 3.8 d 220 218 Po218 As218 LEGEND Stable majority gamma 3m 2s Type of Decay emitters detected by m 20 216 2 14 Bi Scintillometers, scintillometers 214 Pb214 Po214 Spectrometers, 27 m 160 s Borehole Probes y 21 212 21 0 21 0 Pb Bi Principal Gamma d 5 Emitters 210 Tl210 Po210 1m 138 d 24 d - Half lives 208 Scintillometers 206 Pb206 Instruments used Tl 206 for Detection stable 4m 204 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ATOMIC NUMBER 10
  • 12. Comparison to Assays • In order to both confirm the validity of the downhole radiometrically derived grades as well as determine if any disequilibrium is present within the mineralised body a comparison to conventionally derived assay grades is normally undertaken. • During the drilling programme a statistically representative number of samples are taken from drill cuttings (these may be RC chips, cut drill core or similar). • The samples are processed through a laboratory with all appropriate QAQC procedures maintained (duplicates, blanks, certified standards etc) in order to maintain the accuracy and precision of the results for the final comparison. • During this process material is sampled from the mineralised zones as well as the non mineralised areas either side of mineralisation (at least 2-3m). • Whilst comparisons to radiometric grades (following application of all correction factors) can be undertaken on a metre by metre basis, variations in sampled down hole position normally means this method is unreliable. • Radiometric grades and sampled intervals should be composited to the entire mineralised interval plus 2-3m either side to allow for any variation in actual down hole position.
  • 13. Comparison to Assays 5,000 Comparison of gamma data 4,500 against assay values on a 4,000 metre by metre y = 0.964x basis, deposit and rock 3,500 type are known to exhibit a level of disequilibrium. 3,000 Note the scatter of data Assay 2,500 points and the lack of 2,000 correlation. Based on 511 samples. 1,500 1,000 500 0 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 Gamma 12
  • 14. Comparison to Assays 5,000 The same base data but now 4,500 composited to mineralised 4,000 intervals (as deposit is layered normal additional un- 3,500 mineralised areas cannot be included in this example). 3,000 Note the correlation of data Assay 2,500 points. Minimum thickness for 2,000 a composite is 3m, average is y = 1.137x 6.39m and is based on 71 1,500 drill holes. 1,000 Additional analysis of the data 500 points to an effective disequilibrium factor of 0 approximately 1.17 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 Gamma 13
  • 15. Comparison to Assays • It is unlikely that the comparison between radiometrically derived grades will be exact, however, in the absence of significant disequilibrium the basic comparison should be within 5% between the two. • This basic discrepancy may be due to a number of factors (formation factor, drill hole size issues etc) but can be normally collected together as a residual factor. • It should be noted that the comparison is between two processes that derive their values from fundamentally different sources – the drilling derived sample and the radiometric value for everything else except the drilling sample. There is a significant volume difference (and therefore potential variability) between the sampling methods – drilling is usually in the region of 10cm diameter and radiometric logging is up to 1m diameter and specifically excludes the drilled portion. 14
  • 16. Calibration Probe Calibration at Kayelekera 3500 Probes are calibrated 3150 Kayelekera Pit against known thicknesses Active Layer Thickness = 1.02 m Hole Diameter = 110 mm and grades of 2800 Hole Fluid = air mineralisation in order to 2450 Probe T360 determine a K-factor, a Run 1 constant value to convert 2100 Run 2 logged counts per second Run 3 Run 4 to an equivalent uranium 1750 grade. 1400 The log to the left shows 4 1050 logging runs at the newly commissioned primary 700 calibration facility at the 350 Kayelekera Minesite. 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 Depth (metres)
  • 17. Calibration (Pelindaba, South Africa) Probe Calibration at Pelindaba 4500 Calibration pits are constructed Calibration Pit: Pelindaba 4000 as a layer of barren material at Grade = 1440 ppm Thickness = 0.86 m the base, a layer of mineralised Hole Diameter = 100 mm 3500 Hole Fluid = air material with a known grade and thickness, and another Probe A775 3000 layer of barren material at the Probe T244 Probe S093 top. 2500 Probe T362 2000 Probe 005 The diameter of the Probe T279 construction is such that an 1500 apparent ‘infinite’ width can be seen by the logging equipment. 1000 The recent transportation of the 500 test pits at Pelindaba has resulted in damage as indicated 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 by the accompanying log. Depth (metres)
  • 18. Calibration Recently constructed full calibration facility at the Kayelekera mine, the photograph shows the top surface of the facility with cased holes of various diameter. The covered pipe at the rear of the pad is a temporary termination for the moisture monitoring equipment.
  • 19. Calibration check facility, LHU Individual historic test pits at LHU refurbished to allow for more frequent calibration checks. A full calibration facility, similar to that at Kayelekera, is currently being constructed at LHU to replace the Gencor pits. 18
  • 20. Sensitivity Checks Probes are checked for instrument drift using a standardised rig and radioactive source. All probes are checked before use for exploration, before each shift for mining and at least once a week when not in normal use. If excessive drift is identified the probe is sent for re-calibration or repair. Probe status is monitored by dedicated staff at all sites (mining and exploration), in addition a report is issued by the geophysical department in Perth each month detailing the calibration and standardisation status of all probes 19
  • 21. Sensitivity checks Probe returned to service Probe re-calibrated Probe damaged and sent for following excessive repair and calibration drift 20
  • 22. Logging equipment Logging equipment, standard Auslog winch and DLS with custom made boom and winch enclosure mounted on Yamaha Rhino 4x4 base. Electrics currently upgraded to Solar power for battery re- charge. Gamma probes, 33mm slimline, with primary calibration at Pelindaba.
  • 23. Rhino service facility All Rhino based equipment is serviced and maintained on site. Service facility also contains a low background area for shift based probe sensitivity checks. 22
  • 24. Data Processing Data from the logging process is downloaded at the end of each shift or drill hole and processed to las files. Data is then combined in a custom Access database where all calibrations and corrections are applied 23

Editor's Notes

  1. Paladin is amongst the worlds top ten uranium producers and is currently positioned at number 8, production is expected to increase over the coming year with the ramp up of stage 3 of Langer Heinrich and the optimisation of Kayelekera. Paladin has active exploration projects in Africa, primarily around the Kayelekera minesite and in Niger, in Australia at Mount Isa and the Manyingee ISR project, and in Canada at the Michelin project. Paladin currently has projects around the world containing about 608Mlb U3O8 of total resources of which approximately 566Mlb U3O8 are attributable to Paladin. All exploration drill holes are downhole logged along with production blast holes at both Langer Heinrich and Kayelekera, this amounts to in excess of a million metres of logging each year.
  2. The local background radiation, from whatever source, is extremely important in relation to down hole logging as it adds directly to the apparent counts per second used in the determination of equivalent grades. The background is always additive to total counts and so will lead to an overestimation of equivalent grade if not treated appropriately. The local background should always be determined on a hole by hole basis as the values are likely to be inconsistent between holes on any project and will be influenced by local conditions. No attempt should be made to account for down hole backgrounds after the determination of an equivalent grade, particularly on multiple drill holes.
  3. As can be seen in this slide, from a single project with the holes positioned approximately 200m from each other, there is considerable local variation in apparent background values. The green trace has a background of approximately 75 cps, the red trace a background of approximately 12 cps and the blue trace a background of approximately 7 cps. An overall subtraction of background on a project wide would most likely result in the under estimation of equivalent grades on the red and blue holes and an over estimation of the green hole. Using the minimum value for background would result in over estimations for the red and green holes. In this case the holes were logged in rods so cps is approximately equivalent to uranium grade. The risk is that non removal of background will result in the generation of apparent, significant, mineralisation, both in terms of thickness and grade. It should be noted that background radiation due to Radon can be extreme (examples from Kayelekera are in the order of 500-1000cps).
  4. A significant amount of down hole logging will take place within the drill rod string, whilst the optimum process is to log in the open hole ground conditions will frequently make this unwise. Whilst there are tables available to calculate the attenuation of gamma rays due to the presence of varying thicknesses of steel it is recommended to perform a calibration of the actual casing factor on the drill rod string in use. Paladin calculates casing factors for drill rod strings, in various combinations, at the start of each drilling programme, with the rod strings in use, and whenever a rod string is changed (ie on rod change out or commencement of a new drill rig). As the casing factor will vary with down hole depth (due to the combinations of rods used) noting of the down hole position of each casing is extremely important. As the factor is a direct multiplier of cps it is very important to get the correct value.
  5. Radon is a frequently ignored, variable, background additive component within down hole logs. The effect of Radon is likely to be hole specific, though may often be associated with faulting and water table on a more project wide basis.
  6. Close up of the refurbished test pit, the original holes were carefully reamed out and full length PVC tubing cemented in place. Following the work the upgraded pits were monitored for Radon loss and repeatedly logged to confirm stability. In the background can be seen one of the scintillometer check pads.
  7. The mine currently uses 6 Yamaha Rhino 4 wheel drive vehicles modified for mine use with radio, marker lights etc, and a specially manufactured boom enclosure for the winch and logging system. The Rhino is set up for single person operation with all electronics housed in dust and waterproof enclosures. Some of the Rhino’s have now been converted to have solar panels on the roof cover to allow for continuous charging of the batteries used to power the logging system, previous battery charging at shift changeover having proved inefficient. At present software used for logging is the Auslog program Alog with all binary and las output files downloaded to the main mine system at the end of each shift. The Rhino was chosen for its ease of operation, low maintenance requirements and small size as it is able to fit between rows of blast holes without damaging drill collars.
  8. The site has constructed an extensive service and storage facility for both Rhino’s and logging equipment with the majority of repairs to any equipment able to be completed on site. The service bay also has an area specifically designated as low background where shift based probe sensitivity checks are carried out. Should a probe need extensive repair the on site calibration pits can be used to re-certify the K-factor for the probe provided that it is close to the original primary calibration. Should this not be the case the probe is returned to Pelindaba for a full re-calibration. As the site will log over 400,000m this year the additional investment in these systems and facilities is fully justified.
  9. Al the end of each shift all the data logged during the shift is downloaded onto the minesite main computer system. To speed up data processing and allow for the generation of ore markouts the las files are batch processed though an in house Microsoft Access database. This processing incorporates a dead time correction, background removal, deconvolution and application of K and other factors. At Langer Heinrich, due to the low overall background values, the background for each hole is calculated automatically from a minimum 1m moving average value (up to a pre-set maximum). Included for comparison is the same Microsoft Access database in use at the Kayelekera Mine site where, due to variable elevated backgrounds caused by Radon, each log has to be individually assessed. Up to 1000 las files can be processed at any one time, however the usual processing batch is 200-500 holes.