SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 59
Download to read offline
INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATED LEARNING IN MANAGEMENT

               GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT



      GROWTH OF INDIAN TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY




SUBMITTED BY                          SUBMITTED TO



ANIRUDDHA BASU                       Prof. SANCHITA GHOSH

KARAN KUNAL                          Prof. KRITI SWARUP

ARPANJALI CHAKRABORTY               Dr. PRANAVA PRAKASH

KRITEEKA SHARMA

SAURAV ROY
                             1
Table of contents
    CONTENTS            Page No.
     Introduction                   3
  Literature Review                 4
Research Methodology               16
      Hypothesis                   22
     Data Analysis                 23
 Results and Findings              26
  Recommendations                  28
      Conclusion                   29
     Annexure                      30
   Bibliography                    57




               2
INTRODUCTION

OVERVIEW OF TELECOM SECTOR

The telecom services have been recognized the world-over as an important tool for
socio-economic development for a nation. It is one of the prime support services
needed for rapid growth and modernization of various sectors of the economy.
Indian telecommunication sector has undergone a major process of transformation
through significant policy reforms, particularly beginning with the announcement
of NTP 1994 and was subsequently re-emphasized and carried forward under NTP
1999.

STATUS OF TELECOM SECTOR

The Indian Telecommunications network with 851 million connections (as June
2011) is the second largest in the world.

Indian telecommunication industry is the world’s second-largest in terms of
number of subscribers, and the world's fastest growing market in terms of number
of new subscribers. India had 851.70 million mobile phone subscribers at the end
of June 2011.The country has the fourth highest number of Internet users with over
100 million as of December 2010. The primary regulator of communications in
India is the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. It closely regulates all of the
industries mentioned below with the exception of newspapers and the Internet
service provider industry.




                                         3
Literature Review
       The Indian telecommunication network is the third largest in the world and
the second largest among the emerging economies of Asia. The Indian
telecommunication sector has continued to record noteworthy success throughout
the year and has emerged as one of the key sectors that have been accountable for
resurgent growth of the Indian economy. The rapid growth of the sector has been
coupled with proactive polices and decisions taken by the Indian Government and
dynamic involvement of the private sector. The liberal policies in the
telecommunication sector have facilitated easy access to telecom companies and a
fair regulatory framework offers services to the Indian consumers at affordable
prices.

MARKET SIZE

Over 20.2 million new subscribers were added in the month of February, thereby
raising the total mobile phone subscription in the country to 791.38 million.

Moreover, the statistics for February state that the rate of growth (2.82 per cent) in
the number of rural mobile phone subscribers surpassed than those of the urban
areas (2.52 per cent) across the country. The broadband subscription in February,
2011 was 11.47 million as compared to 11.21 million in January, 2011.

The Indian telecom sector is largely dominated by private operators that control a
share of 87.9 per cent share of the entire sector. Among the top players in the
telecom sector, Bharti Airtel owns the largest share at 20.09 per cent, followed by
Reliance (16.7 per cent), Vodafone (16.54 per cent), state-owned BSNL (11.41 per
cent), Tata (11.08 per cent) and Idea (10.97 per cent). Vodafone has recorded the
fastest growth rate in the month of February, at 17.61 per cent in its subscription
base. Reliance (16.36 per cent), Bharti (15.85 per cent), Idea (12.43 per cent),
Aircel (8.26 per cent) and Tata (7.93 per cent) have also recorded decent growth
rate figures for the month of February, 2011, according to Telecom Regulatory
Authority of India (TRAI) database.




                                           4
TOP 10 TELECOM COMPANIES IN INDIA

• Bharti Airtel

• BSNL

• Vodafone Essar

• Reliance

• Idea Cellular

• Tata Communications (formerly VSNL)

• Tata Teleservices

• Aircel

• MTNL

• Videocon Mobile Services



AIRTEL
Bharti Airtel Limited formerly known as Bharti Tele-Ventures LTD (BTVL) is an
Indian company offering telecommunication services in 19 countries across Asia
and Africa. It is the largest cellular service provider in India, with more than 162.2
million subscriptions as of March 2011. It has been ranked among six best
performing technology in the world by business week. Bharti Airtel is the world's
third largest, single-country mobile operator and fifth largest telecom operator in
the world with a subscriber base of over 200 million.

 It is known for being the first mobile phone company in the world to outsource
everything except marketing and sales and finance. Its network (base stations,
microwave links, etc.) is maintained by Ericsson and Nokia Siemens
Network, business support by IBM . Stakeholders are as follows-:



                                           5
Bharti Enterprises (64.76%)
Singapore Telecommunications (32%)
Vodafone (4.4%)



RELIANCE

Reliance Communications is India’s integrated telecommunications service
provider. The Company has a customer base of 105 million including over 2.5
million individual overseas retail customers. It ranks among the Top 5 Telecom
companies in the world by number of customers in a single country. Reliance
Communications corporate clientele includes 2,100 Indian and multinational
corporations, and over 800 global, regional and domestic carriers. The entire
communications covers over 24,000 towns and 600,000 villages. The stake holders
are as follows-:

Reliance (74%)

Public (26%)

BHARAT SANCHAR NAGAM LIMITED (A GOVT. OF INDIA
ENTERPRISE)

BSNL is the third largest cellular service provider, with over 66.88 million
customers as of June 2010 and the largest land line telephone provider in India.
BSNL further plans to increase its customer base to 160 Million by March, 2014.
Its headquarters are at Bharat Sanchar Bhawan, Harish Chandra Mathur
Lane, Janpath, New Delhi. It has the status of Miniratna, a status assigned to
reputed Central Public Sector Enterprise in India.

VODAFONE
Vodafone Essar, formerly known as Hutchison Essar is a cellular
operator in India that covers 23 telecom circles in India. Vodafone Essar is owned
by Vodafone 67% and Essar Group 33%. It is the second largest mobile
phone operator in terms of revenue behind Bharti Airtel, and third largest in terms
of customers.
                                         6
Despite the official name being Vodafone Essar, its products are simply
branded Vodafone. It offers both prepaid and postpaid GSM cellular
phone coverage throughout India with good presence in the metros.

Vodafone Essar provides 2.75G services based on 900 MHz and 1800 MHz digital
GSM technology, offering voice and data services in 23 of the country's 23 license
areas. It is among the top three GSM mobile operators of India.

TATA DOCOMO

It is a Tata Teleservices Limited's (TTSL) cellular service provider on the GSM
platform-arising out of the Tata Group's strategic joint venture with Japanese
telecom giant NTT Docomo in November 2008. Tata Teleservices has received a
pan-India license to operate GSM telecom services, under the brand "TATA
DOCOMO" and has also been allotted spectrum in 18 telecom Circles. TTSL has
already rolled out its services in various circles. It has become very popular with its
one second pulse especially in semi-urban and rural areas.

IDEA

Idea Cellular is a wireless telephony company operating in all the 22 telecom
circles in India based in Mumbai. In 2000, Tata Cellular was a company
providing mobile services in AP. When Birla-AT&T brought Maharashtra and
Gujarat to the table, the merger of these two entities was a reality. Thus Birla-Tata-
AT&T, popularly known as Batata, was born and was later branded as idea. Then
Idea set sights on RPG’s operations in Madhya Pradesh which was successfully
acquired, helping Batata have a million subscribers, and the license to be the fourth
operator in Delhi was clinched.

AIRCEL
Aircel is a joint venture between Maxis Communications of Malaysia and Apollo
Hospital Enterprise Ltd of India. Maxis have a 74% stake in Aircel and the
remaining 26% is with Apollo Hospitals. It is India’s fifth largest GSM mobile
service provider with a subscriber base of over 27.7 million, as of October 31,
2009. It has a market share of 12.8% among the GSM operators in the country

UNINOR
                                           7
It has received spectrum to roll out these services in 21 of the 22 telecom circles.
Uninor will be owned 67.25% by Norwegian telecom giant Telenor, and 32.75%
by UNITECH. Uninor has started mobile services in India at the end of 2009,
focusing on the GSM technology.

Uninor is India's eighth nation-wide mobile operator, in a competitive landscape of
13 nation-wide or regional mobile operators

STRATEGIES ROLLED OUT BY AIRTEL

The major strategies of Bharti Airtel in the past 5 years are as under:

1. Outsourcing all major operations except Marketing, Sales and Finance:

It is known for being the first mobile phone company in the world to outsource
everything except marketing and sales and finance. Its network (base stations,
microwave links, etc.) is maintained by Ericsson and Nokia Siemens Network,
business support by IBM.

Oracle provides Bharti Airtel with real-time financial and human resources
information as well as information for the organization to churn out higher
operational efficiency, along with better visibility and enhanced management over
its financial and HR operations.

2. Bharti Airtel has a joint Venture with Alcatel-Lucent to manage the network
infrastructure for the Telemedia Business.

3. Bharti Airtel and Google announced a strategic partnership, as part of the
agreement, Airtel will bring Google search to the Airtel Live mobile WAP portal.
Google will also incorporate advertising through its Mobile Ads product on the
Airtel Live mobile portal.

This was a good move however, since the advent of faster internet connectivity this
facility has taken a beating as mobile users can now access the whole page on the
web rather than a slimmed down version of the same webpage.

4. M-Commerce



                                           8
Mobile phone now turns into a virtual wallet – a new innovation in mobile
commerce. Airtel, ICICI Bank & VISA had joined hands to launch mChq – a
revolutionary new service – a credit card on the mobile phone.

This is the first mobile-to-mobile payment option, which enables Airtel customers
and ICICI Bank Visa cardholders to pay for their purchases with their Airtel
mobile phones.

.

5. Targeting 55 million farmers under its fold, Indian Farmers Fertilizer
Cooperative (IFFCO) have agreed upon a joint venture with telecom major Bharti
Airtel to provide a boost to Indian agriculture and rural economy at large.

6. Hiring the best or attracting the best (poaching or otherwise)

Airtel has a history of hiring some of the high level officials from other companies
to be an integral part of their business. This is not just the strategy used by Airtel
but also other telecom majors.

Some of the recently hired officials are Shireesh Joshi (previously in PepsiCo) as
Director Marketing head. Bharti Airtel has also recently roped in Joachim Horn,
chief technology officer (CTO), T-Mobile, to help expand its global footprint and
interface with strategic partners.

7. Expansion into Africa

Airtel made rapid strides to expand its presence in Africa first through showing
intent of acquiring MTN, which was called by The Economist as ‘marrying up’ but
as the deal went awry they moved forward by acquiring Zain Telecoms business in
15 countries in Africa.

This is an important move as Africa has a higher consumer spending, $ 1.4 trillion,
average revenue per user of $8 which is much higher than India and only 3 to 5
players in each market making it one key market where Airtel can expand. With
the infrastructure of Zain in place the market share of Airtel is already high in the
continent.

8. Digital TV, the DTH service from Airtel

                                          9
The implementation of the initially failed concept of Set Top Box led Airtel to
enter this lucrative market to television. Cable connection in India was run by local
cable operators who acted largely in form of cartels. With the crackdown from the
regulatory bodies in India this sector once again became a gold mine.

9. Joint venture deal with Wal-Mart, the US retail giant, to start a number of retail
stores across India. This is crucial for Airtel as this would mark its entry into the
new theatre of retailing. The most important facet of retailing is logistics which is a
major challenge in India for Airtel.



STRATEGIES OF VODAFONE INDIA

1. Core Competencies:

Vodafone’s primary aim is to be a world leader in mobile communication and at
the same time provide a unique experience to the customers who use their services.
By analysing the overall structure of the company, it can be understood that
reliable innovative services and the customer centric passion are the core products
of the company.

The brand image of Vodafone is very strong in the market and a continuous
recycling of their campaigns from the pug to Zoo zoo’s to the present blackberry
boys advertisements has guaranteed their brand a high recall value.

2. Market Prospects / Penetration:

Vodafone’s intention to tap the price sensitive rural market comes with its low cost
offerings such as low priced Magic Box which has a bundled low priced handset
along with prepaid card and various freebies. Products like Vodafone 150 priced at
Rs. 799 and eco-friendly solar charging handset VF 247 will help Vodafone to
penetrate the rural market in a big way.

3. Competitive Advantage:

From product innovation to technological advantage, Vodafone as a brand keeps
on improving and coming up with new plans. Vodafone adjusts according to the
changing market which gives them a competitive advantage. Vodafone has from

                                          10
time to time come with creative advertising campaign for its various plans which
has captured the imagination of millions. Vodafone’s plans like “Chota Recharge”
and number of add on plans like these has made it sure that it maintains an edge
over its competitors. Vodafone pursues a global international corporate-level
strategy and has heavily focused on acquisitions like Hutch acquisition in India.



SWOT OF TELECOM INDUSTRY IN INDIA

Strengths

• Huge Customer potential

• Tele density still being 48% and rural tele density 21%.

• The broadband subscribers grew from 0.18 million in 2005 to 6.2 million as on
30 April 2009 and about 7.98 million, at the end of the December 2009 and till
June 2011 it was about 11.41 million.

• High Growth Rate

• Wireless subscribers growing at a CAGR of 60 per cent per annum since 2006.

• Allowed FDI limit ranging from 74% to 100%

• The total FDI equity inflows in telecom sector have been US$ 2223 million
during April-November 2009-10

• The foreign direct investment in the telecom sector was Rs 5,434.48 crore during
the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

Weakness

• Poor Telecommunication Infrastructure

▫ Result: Large number of call drops.

• Late adopters of New Technology- India was amongst the last countries in the
world to get access to 3G technology.3.5G is and even 4G are there in many
countries and in India 3G is not properly available among all circles.
                                         11
• Most competitive market

Opportunities

• 3G Telecom services and 4G services

• More Quality Service

• Value added Services (VAS)

• Boost to Telecom Manufacturing Companies

• Telecom Equipment Exports

▫ The Indian telecom industry is expected to reach a size of Rs 344,921 crore by
2012 at a growth rate of over 26 per cent, and generate employment opportunities
for about 10 million people during the same period. The sector would create direct
employment for 2.8 million people and for 7 million indirectly, according to a
Frost and Sullivan report.

• Horizontal Integration

Threats

• Declining ARPU (average Revenue per user)

▫ E.g. price wars like per-second billing which is deflating revenues and making
sure the ‘survival of the fittest’

• Partiality on the part of the Govt.

▫ e.g. Allowing 3G service in a PSU (MTNL,BSNL) before auctioning to Private
Sector.

• Content Piracy

Large Market Potential

Around 30-40 million people in India join the middle class every year. The
country’s upper middle class spends 6 percent of its earnings on telecom services.
India is one of the largest consumer markets in the world. Due to rapid economic
                                        12
growth and rise in disposable income, the spending power of consumers is
increasing rapidly. It has been forecasted that 15 years down the line, Indians will
be approximately four times richer than they are today. As per this forecast,
Indians will purchase five times more cars and consume three times more crude oil
than they do today.

Low Labour Cost

CII estimates that manufactured product outsourcing accounted for US$ 10 billion
in 2007. The value will escalate to US$ 50 billion by 2015. India has one of the
lowest labour costs among the developing countries, which is the foremost factor
for attracting multinational giants in every sector.

Growth of the Sector

The phenomenal growth in the Indian mobile industry was brought about by the
wireless revolution that began in the nineties. Besides this, the following factors
also aided the growth of the industry.

Liberalization

The relaxation of telecom regulations has played a major role in the development
of the Indian telecom industry. The liberalization policies of 1991 and the
consequent influx of private players have led the industry on a high growth
trajectory and have increased the level of competition. Post-liberalization, the
telecom industry has received more investments and has implemented higher
technology.

Changing Demographic Profile

The changing demographic profile of India has also played an important role in
subscriber growth. The changed profile is characterized by a large young
population, a burgeoning middle class with growing disposable income,
urbanization, increasing literacy levels and higher adaptability to technology.
These new features have multiplied the need to be connected always and to own a
wireless phone and therefore, in present times mobiles are perceived as a utility
rather than a luxury.


                                         13
Increased Competition & Declining Tariffs

Liberalization of the telecom industry has fuelled intense competition, especially in
the cellular segment. The ever-increasing competition has led to high growth of
subscribers and has put pressure on tariffs, which have seen a sharp drop over the
years. When the cellular phones were introduced, call rates were at a peak of Rs 16
per minute and there were charges for incoming calls too. Today, however,
incoming calls are no longer charged and outgoing calls are charged at less than a
rupee per minute.

Growth Avenues

A managed service is another segment that is attracting telecom companies. On
account of the rapidly growing subscriber base, service providers find it difficult to
manage their infrastructure and network management operations. In such cases,
they completely or partially outsource their infrastructure or network management
operations.

To reduce their network deployment costs, many service providers are considering
infrastructure sharing offers the following advantages:

 Improved service quality

 Increased affordability for customers

 Faster roll out of services in rural and remote areas

 Increased environmental aesthetics

 Lower operating costs for service providers

Value Added Services: The VAS industry was worth USD 632 million in 2006–07.
The industry is estimated to grow by 65 percent in 2011–12 and become an USD
1,011 million opportunity.




                                          14
Problems

Multiple issues plague the mobile industry growth in the country

Declining Quality and Congestion

One of the major consumer issues is increased network congestion and the
consequent Quality of Service (QoS). This problem is particularly exacerbated in
densely populated parts of cities and during peak times. The principal reason for
this problem is that the service providers have not scaled up their telecom network
infrastructure in proportion to the increased network usage. The latter is a direct
consequence of the increased number of subscribers and increased number of calls
made by these subscribers.

Increase in Number of Telecom Towers

The larger number of subscribers and service providers has led to the
mushrooming of telecom towers, especially in metros and big cities. These towers
contain mobile base station equipment, which produces 900 and 1800 MHz
pulsated waves. This has increased the electromagnetic contamination- referred to
commonly as "Electro smog" in urban centers. A number of scientific studies have
been done which warn us about danger posed by this electromagnetic
contamination to the health of humans and other living being




                                         15
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Introduction to Research Methodology

Research is common parlance refers to a search for knowledge. One can also
define research as a scientific and systematic search for pertinent information on a
specific topic. In fact, research is an art of investigation. According to Clifford
Woody research comprises defining and redefining problems, formulating
hypothesis or suggested solutions, collecting, organizing and evaluating data,
making deductions and reaching conclusions; and at last carefully testing the
conclusions to determine whether they fit the formulating hypothesis. Like every
subject this topic of the handloom sector has also been thoroughly researched and
the relevant information has been rightly used.

Qualitative and Quantitative Research Data Gathering:

Quantitative Data

Information that can be counted or expressed numerically is called quantitative
data. This type of data is often collected in experiments, manipulated and
statistically analyzed. Quantitative data can be represented visually in graphs and
charts.

Qualitative Data

Qualitative data is extremely varied in nature. It includes virtually any information
that can be captured that is not numerical in nature. 'Soft' data that approximates
but does not measure the attributes, characteristics, properties, of a thing or
phenomenon is called qualitative data.


There are two methods of collecting data. They are:

Primary Data

It is a term for data collected on source which has not been subjected to processing
or any other manipulation. It is the Data that has been compiled for a specific

                                          16
purpose, and has not been collated or merged with others. Primary data is always
collected from firsthand experience.

Secondary Data

Secondary data is data collected by someone other than the user. Common sources
of secondary data for social science include censuses, surveys, organizational
records and data collected through qualitative methodologies or qualitative
research. Secondary data analysis saves time that would otherwise be spent
collecting data and, particularly in the case of quantitative data, provides larger and
higher-quality databases than would be unfeasible for any individual researcher to
collect on their own.

Pilot Study

An initial Pilot study has been conducted to determine what factors influence
customers to choose a certain network over other competitors. The study found
fifteen factors which are detrimental to consumers. The factors are:

      Local Call Rates
      STD Call Rates
      Family Members Using The Network
      Free Call Services
      Convenience In Paying Bills
      Network Connectivity
      Frequent Promotional Offers
      Roaming Connectivity
      Internet Access
      Availability Of Recharge Coupons
      Family Friend Group Services
      Messaging Packs
      Payment/ Recharge Kiosk
      Customer Care Service
      Popularity Of the Company




                                          17
Questionnaire

A questionnaire was prepared based on the above fifteen factors and a sample size
of a hundred people were taken, consisting of people from different age groups,
profession, geographic location and income.
The results obtained from the questionnaire were used for performing co-relation
and other statistical tasks.

Correlation

The word correlation is used to denote the degree of association between variables.
If two variables x and y are so related that variations in the magnitude of one
variable tend to be accompanied by variations in the magnitude of other variables,
they are said to be correlated. If y tends to increase as x increases, the variables are
said to be positively related. If y tends to decrease as x increases the variables are
negatively correlated. If the values of y are not affected by changes in the value of
x, the variables are said to be uncorrelated.
The co-relation used is to depict that call rates are inversely proportional to number
of customers using the network.
With the growth in the customer base over the years the call rates have declined.

Properties of correlation coefficient

The correlation coefficient ‘r’ is independent of the choice of both origin and scale
of observations the correlation coefficient ‘r’ is a pure number and is independent
of the units of measurement. The correlation coefficient
‘r’ lies between –1& +1.

Formulae,




We use this correlation method to correlate the mobile call rates for several years
with the total mobile subscribers of those years. We calculate the Pearson’s
correlation with the software SPSS to find out whether the value is significant or
not.
                                           18
Rank correlation

The product-moment correlation coefficient ( r ) is calculated by using ‘values’ of
the variables. But many situations arise in which either either precise
measurements are not available, or the characters cannot be measured ta all. For
example, in order to find the extent os association between ‘intelligence’ and
‘efficiency in salesmanship’ for a group of salesman. But this method is open to
many objections, and an exact measurement of the two qualities is not at all
possible.
R lies between +1 & -1

Formulae,




We have used spearman’s rank correlation to correlate the total mobile subscribers
for different operators of a particular year, i.e. 2009-2010 with the total port in’s of
subscribers to their operators. We use spearman’s rank correlation as the data was
available for only one year. We calculate the spearman’s rank correlation with the
help of a software SPSS to find its significance.

Factor Analysis

Factor Analysis is a statistical method used to describe variability among observed,
correlated variables in terms of a potentially lower number of unobserved variables
called factors. In other words, it is possible, for example, that variations in three or
four observed variables mainly reflect the variations in fewer such unobserved
variables. Factor analysis searches for such joint variations in response to
unobserved latent variables. The observed variables are modeled as linear
combinations of the potential factors, plus "error" terms. The information gained
about the interdependencies between observed variables can be used later to reduce
the set of variables in a dataset.




                                           19
Principal Component Analysis

Principal component analysis is a mathematical procedure that uses an orthogonal
transformation to convert a set of observations of possibly correlated variables into
a set of values of linearly uncorrelated variables called principal components. The
number of principal components is less than or equal to the number of original
variables. This transformation is defined in such a way that the first principal
component has the largest possible variance (that is, accounts for as much of the
variability in the data as possible), and each succeeding component in turn has the
highest variance possible under the constraint that it be orthogonal to (i.e.,
uncorrelated with) the preceding components. Principal components are guaranteed
to be independent only if the data set is jointly normally distributed. PCA is
sensitive to the relative scaling of the original variables.

Certain terminologies used in the factor analysis are: -

Varimax: An orthogonal rotation method that minimizes the number of variables
that have high loadings on each factor.

Communality Matrix: Communality matrix indicates the amount of variance in
each variable that is accounted for. The initial communalities is the estimate of the
variance in each variable accounted for by all components/factors. Extraction
communality is the estimate of the variance in each variable accounted for in the
factor solution.
The smaller value indicates that they do not fit well with the factor solution.

Total variance matrix: The total variance matrix provides us with the values which
are based on initial eigen values. The total column gives the amount of variance in
the observed variable accounted for by each component/factor.

Rotated Component Matrix: From the rotated component matrix we take the
components which is better represented and have higher position on the screen plot
i.e, these factors are highly loaded and contribute to the resultant output.
Factor Transformation Matrix: The factor transformation matrix describes the
specific rotation applied to your factor solution.

Component Plot in Rotated Space; Component plot in rotated space provides a
graphical representation of the variable in the component space.

                                          20
Bartlett's test

A method to test for the equalities of variances from a number of independent
normal samples by testing the hypothesis.

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) Test

The KMO test is used to determine whether the sample size is adequate or not. If
the results show less than.5 as an answer the sample size is considered inadequate.

Forecasting

Forecasting is the use of historical data to determine the future trends. It is used by
companies to determine how to allocate their budgets for an upcoming period of
time. This is typically based on demand for the goods and services it offers,
compared to the cost of producing them. Investors utilize forecasting to determine
if events affecting a company, such as sales expectations, will increase or decrease
the price of shares in that company. Forecasting also provides an important
benchmark for firms which have a long-term perspective of operations.

Linear forecasting

Linear forecasting is a mathematical operation where future values of discrete time
series are estimated as a linear function of previous samples.
I have used this method to forecast the total mobile and landline subscribers up to
the year 2014-2015. I have used Microsoft Excel to forecast the landline and
mobile subscribers for different years.




                                          21
HYPOTHESIS
H10: Mobile call rates do not significantly affect total mobile
subscriber base.
H11: Mobile call rates significantly affect total mobile subscriber
base.




                                22
DATA ANALYSIS

Table - 1 along with the Bar Graph, depict the growth of Subscriber Base in India
at the end of each financial year during the past decade (2000 to 2010). It can be
seen that during the last year (2010) although BSNL and MTNL have registered
decline, private operators have jointly had a growth of 11.51% increasing the
connections from 5.04 million to 5.62 million.

Table - 1.1 shows the Annual Growth Rate registered by Basic and Cellular Phone
services for a period of three years ranging from 1998-99 to 2000-01. The
Histogram below clearly indicates a rapidly increasing trend in the growth rate of
Cellular Phone services.

Table - 1.2 demonstrates Growth of Cellular Phone Subscribers in different Metros
and Circles of India during the years 1997 to 2003. The bar graph along with the
table show that the number of such subscribers has consistently increased over the
years.

Table - 1.3 and its subsequent graphical representation indicate Company-wise,
the number of Mobile Telephone Connections/Subscribers in Rural and Urban
Areas of India as on 31st December, 2010. When compared individually, it can be
seen that 'Reliance Telecom + Communications Ltd’ has the maximum number
(9,85,69,506) of subscribers in urban areas while ‘Bharati Airtel’ has the maximum
number (6,08,47,715) of subscribers in rural areas. However when compared in
totality, (i.e., no. of subscribers in urban areas + rural areas),’ Bharati Airtel’
clearly dominates the other companies with a subscriber base of 15,24,95,219.

Table - 1.4 shows the Percentage Rate of Growth in Postpaid and Prepaid Mobile
Subscribers in India from the financial year 2000 to 2004. It is visible from the Pie
Charts that both Postpaid Subscribers as well as Prepaid subscribers indicate an
increasing trend.

Table - 1.5 points out Company-wise, the Market Share and Technology used by
the Subscriber Base of Mobile Operators in India as on March, 2005. The Bar
Graph represents the total number of different cellular group subscribers, Bharati
                                         23
Group having the maximum number (1,09,84,280) of subscribers. The Pie Chart
represents the approximate market share of the different cellular groups, Bharati
Group consequently having maximum market share and HFCl and Shyam Telelink
having almost no market share.

Table – 1.6 along with its Line Chart indicate Operator-wise, the number of
Subscribers who ported their numbers under Mobile Number Portability Scheme
(MNPS) in India as on 25th February, 2011. It is seen that Bharati Airtel has the
maximum number of total ports (5,30,615) in as well as total ports (3,82,400) out
followed by Vodafone (ports in-4,88,250 & ports out-2,95,489).

Table – 1.7 represents Circle-wise, the Population and Area Covered under Mobile
Telephone Services in India as on 30th June, 2010. The Pie Charts indicate that out
of the total population covered under mobile telephone services, Uttar Pradesh East
has a maximum population of 8,08,22,915. On the other hand, out of the total area
covered under mobile telephone services, Andhra Pradesh covers a maximum area
of 2,20,326 sq km. Andaman and Nicobar Islands have a minimum population of
3,16,000 and covers a minimum area of 797 sq km.

Table – 1.8 indicates the total number of Fixed (landline + Wll) and Mobile
Phones in India during the years 1999 to 2006. The Line chart shows that although
there has been a considerable rise in the number of fixed/basic phones over the
years, the number of mobile phones have immensely risen from only 1.2 million in
1999 to 92.52 million in 2006.

Table – 1.9 its Graph and Pie Charts illustrate the Subscriber Base of Mobile
(GSM and CDMA) Services in India from March 2000 to March 2009. On
examining, it is seen that apart from BPL and Sistema which have fluctuating
growth rates , all the other Service Providers have shown an increasing trend it
their growths.

Table – 1.10 demonstrates Category-wise, the Subscriber Base for Mobile (GSM)
Services in India from 1999 to 2007. The Bar Graph rightly shows that the
subscriber base of Metros, A circles, B circles and C circles have all grown
considerably over the years.

Table – 1.11 points out the Top Five Mobile Operators on the basis of Market
Share along with Subscriber Base in India as on March, 2003 and March, 2004.
The Graph represents the top five mobile operators on the basis of subscriber base
                                        24
in India, Bharati being in the first position in 2003 and Reliance being in the first
position in 2004 and Idea being in the fifth position in both the years. The Pie
Charts indicate the top five mobile operators on the basis of their market share in
the years 2003 and 2004, Bharati having maximum percentage of market share in
2003 and Reliance having maximum in 2004.

Table – 1.12 and its subsequent graphical representation illustrate the Trends in
Revenue Earned per minute (Incoming + Outgoing) for GSM Cellular Services in
India from the year 2000 to 2004. It shows the revenue earned per minute and its
respective percentage change under Postpaid services, Prepaid services and
Blended (postpaid + prepaid) Services.

Table – 1.13 demonstrates the trend in Growth of Tele-density from March 2005
to March 2010. It is clearly visible from the Line Chart that the tele-density at the
end of March,2010 reached the mark of 52.74 as compared to 36.98 at the end of
the previous year recording an increase of nearly 15.76 .

Table-1.14 shows the forecasting of the total landline subscribers and total mobile
subscribers up to 2014-2015. It is represented by a line graph showing the growth
in the landline subscribers and mobile subscribers. The rate of growth of mobile
subscribers is more in comparison to the rate of growth of the landline subscribers
due to continuous decrease in the tariff rates of mobile.

Table-1.15 shows the operator wise growth from 1999-2000 to 2009-2010. It is
represented through a bar graph showing growth of different operators in different
years. It is seen from this graph that all the operator’s subscriber base has grown
but the highest growth is in Airtel followed by Relaince.

Table-1.16 shows the service revenue earned by the different telecom operators
from 2008-2009 to 2011-2012. It is represented by a bar graph showing growth of
different operators in different years. I have also forecasted the revenue earned by
the operators for the year 2011-2012 on the basis of previous years revenue earned.
It is seen from this graph that the maximum revenue is earned by Airtel followed
by Reliance.

Table-1.17 shows the correlation between mobile call rates and total cellular
subscribers. The correlation is -.889 at 0.01 level of significance which means both
                                         25
are highly and negatively correlated and the data is statistically significant. It
means with decrease in cellular call rates the total cellular subscribers will rise.

Table-1.18 shows the trend in revenue earned per minute for both incoming and
outgoing for all the GSM operators. It is represented by a line graph showing the
fall in the revenue earned per minute for both postpaid and prepaid numbers for the
year 1999-2000 to 2003-2004. It is seen from the graph that the prepaid revenue
earned per minute has reduced more in comparison to postpaid revenue with the
increase in number of operators and subscriber base in the industry.

Table-1.19 shows the Spearman’s rank correlation between total subscribers of
different operators and the total port in’s for the different operators. The
Spearman’s rank correlation is .709 at 0.05 level of significance which means both
are highly and positively correlated and data is statistically significant.



                      RESULTS AND FINDINGS

    The most important and obvious finding is that the Telecom Industry has
     significantly grown over the past decade (2000-2010) with a high boom
     during the period 2005-2010.

    The Subscriber Base in the urban areas, especially in the Metros, has highly
     risen in the last five years as compared to the Rural areas.

    The rate of growth in the number of Cellular Phone subscribers has been
     more rapid as compared to that of the Basic Phone subscribers.

    During the last year (2010) although BSNL and MTNL have registered
     decline, private operators have jointly had a growth of 11.51% increasing the
     connections from 5.04 million to 5.62 million.



                                         26
 Both prepaid and postpaid subscribers have shown an increasing trend in
  their growth rate.

 The Tele-density at the end of March, 2010 reached the mark of 52.74 as
  compared to 36.98 at the end of the previous year recording an increase of
  nearly 15.76.

 The top five mobile operators in India, on the basis of subscriber base and
  market share, are Airtel, Reliance, BSNL, Vodafone and Idea.

 Bharati Airtel has the maximum number of subscribers in the Rural areas
  and Urban areas.


 In totality, Bharati Airtel has the maximum percentage of share in the
  market.

 There has been a significant rise in the total mobile subscribers. It has
  increased from 3107449 in 1999-00 to 494036000 in 2009-10, which further
  will increase to 950802215 in 2014-2015.

 There has been a significant rise in the total mobile subscribers. It has
  increased from 3107449 in 1999-00 to 494036000 in 2009-10, which further
  will increase to 950802215 in 2014-2015

 There has been an increase in total landline subscribers but this is not risen
  significantly and has increased at an decreasing rate.

 There has been a significant decrease in average cellular call rates from Rs.5
  in 1999-00 to Rs. 0.5 in 2009-10.

 There has been a significant impact of total port in’s of different operators to
  total mobile subscribers in the year 2009-2010 for different operators, this
  affects the market share of different operators.
                                      27
 Lastly, it is seen that with the growth in the number of users in the Telecom
     industry, the call rates have been subsequently declining

On examining and reviewing all the data and findings, the following
RECCOMENDATIONS could be made:

    Small players and non performing like S TEL, Sistema, Loop Mobile,
     Etisalat (Cheers Mobile) should merge with major players like Airtel and
     Vodafone as norms related to merger and acquisition will be relaxed after
     2011 telecom policy is implemented.
    As India have large middle class people companies should tie up with Apple
     and Blackberry to offer Handset with an effective EMI scheme with postpaid
     plan as it happens in country like U.K.
    Airtel should outsource its marketing operations too.
    Vodafone launched I Phone 4 quite later after being launched by Airtel and
     Aircel. In future Vodafone should be in line or a step ahead of its
     competitors.
    As the government targets to increase rural teledensity, this segment will
     boost the demand for telecom services, equipment, Internet services and
     other value-added services; thereby, offering great market opportunities for
     telecom players.
    Companies should focus on awareness and promotion campaigns in rural
     areas.
    Airtel can launch its own handsets as Vodafone is doing at cheaper rates.




                                        28
CONCLUSION
The mobile service provider industry in India has experienced exponential growth
over the past few years and has been an important contributor to economic growth;
however, the cut-throat competition and intense tariff wars have had a negative
impact on the revenue of players. Despite the challenges, the Indian mobile service
provider industry will thrive because of the immense potential in terms of new
users. India is one of the most-attractive cellular markets because it is still one of
the lowest penetrated markets. Operators are on an expansion mode and are
investing heavily on telecom infrastructure. Foreign telecom companies are
acquiring considerable stakes in Indian companies. Burgeoning middle class and
increasing purchasing power, the government’s thrust on increasing rural telecom
coverage, favorable investment climate and positive reforms will ensure that
India’s high potential is indeed realized.

While preparing the above Term Paper the following shortcomings were observed.
The absence of such shortcomings would definitely assure the betterment of the
project in future.

    Moreover, since only the Telecom Industry in the Indian market was
     analyzed and the Global markets were not taken into account, therefore the
     true position of this industry in the Global Market Sector could not be
     determined. Examination of the industry on a global basis would tell us
     where exactly the industry stands.

    Further, the time span for preparing the project, being too short, the
     intricacies of the individual companies, their reason for growth or decline
     and other pros and cons etc., could not be looked into at depth.



                                          29
 The Questionnaire survey could only be performed in the confines of only
     one city due to time constraints. Hence the results do depict a vague
     similarity due to the people belonging to same culture, income group and
     other similar factors.
                    FUTURE OF THE INDUSTRY
According to the analytical study of the telecom sector, the use of mobile phones is
growing day by day in the Indian telecom sector with a projected growth of CAGR
of around 6.6% increase in the subscriber base of 2011-2012 to 2014-2015. The
other segments of this industry will also record growth, like the internet are also
anticipated growth both in terms of subscriber addition and development of
infrastructure during the forecast period. Moreover, with the launch of 3G services,
the country is expected to witness rapid surge in the broadband subscribers’ base
during the coming years.

According to a Gartner report, after China, India would be fastest growing mobile
telephony market in Asia Pacific with revenues slated to increase at a CAGR of
18.4% to reach $25 billion in 2011 from current $9 billion.

Cellular penetration would increase to 38.6% in 2011 with 58% of rural population
and 95% of urban population possessing mobile phone. The market will be driven
by prepaid connections, which will account for more than 93% connections. The
voluntary churn rate is expected to reach 41% from current 30.6%.

The revenues from data services will contribute to the revenue growth; however
the bulk of the revenues will continue to come from voice services. Customers
with low disposable incomes will increase as such the Average Revenue Per User
will decline.

Large players will have an advantage as they expand their presence and take
advantage of economies of scale. But they will face tremendous challenges owing
to intensifying competition.


                                         30
Annexure

                                        TABLE - 1
                             GROWTH OF SUBSCRIBER
                              BASE FROM 2000-2010
                            FINANCIAL   SUBSCRIBER BASE (IN
                               YEAR          MILLION)
                              2000               28.53
                              2001               36.29
                              2002               44.97
                              2003               54.62
                              2004               75.54
                              2005               98.41
                              2006              140.32
                              2007              206.83
                              2008              300.49
                              2009              429.72
                              2010              621.28



Source: www.indiastat.com




                                           31
700                                                                                     621.28
        600
        500                                                                            429.72
        400
                                                                              300.49
        300                                                          206.83
        200                                                 140.32
                                             75.54 98.41
        100          28.53 36.29 44.97 54.62
          0
              2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

                                     SUBSCRIBER BASE (IN MILLION)


                            Source: Based on the above table (author’s work

                                              TABLE - 1.1
   Annual Growth Rate Registered by Basic and Cellular Phone Services
                        (1998-99 to 2000-01)
                                         Growth Rate
              Year                              Basic                                     Cellular

                                              Phone                                        Phone
           1998-99                            21.40%                                       35.96%
           1999-00                            23.32%                                       57.08%
           2000-01                            22.73%                                       89.84%

Source: www.vision2020planningcommission.nic.in




                                                  32
100.00%

   80.00%

   60.00%
                                                                  Growth Rate Basic Phone
   40.00%
                                                                  Growth Rate Cellular Phone
   20.00%

     0.00%
                  1998-99           1999-00             2000-01

Source: Based on the above table (author’s work)

                                              TABLE - 1.2
                         Growth of Cellular Phone Subscribers in India
                                        (1997 to 2003)
Subscribers As on                          Metros                   Circles                Total
         1997                              325967                    12698               338665
         1998                              551757                   330559               882316
         1999                              519543                   680035              1199578
         2000                              795931                  1088380              1884311
         2001                             1362592                  2214503              3577095
         2002                             2567757                  3863763              6431520
         2003                             4439524                  8248113             12687637

Source: www.indiastat.com




                                                   33
30000000

        25000000

        20000000
                                                                               Total
        15000000
                                                                               Circles
        10000000
                                                                               Metros
         5000000

               0
                     1997     1998      1999       2000   2001   2002   2003


Source: Based on the above table (author’s work)




                                                   34
TABLE - 1.3
 Company-wise Number of Mobile Telephone Connections/Subscribers in Rural and Urban Areas
                                        of India
                                   (As on 31.12.2010)
 Sl.                                                                 Mobile Telephones
               Companies
 No.                                           Rural                          Urban                          Total
  1              Aircel                      17731187                           32437624                    50168811
  2          Bharati Airtel                  60847715                           91647504                   152495219
  3      Etisalat DB Telecom                     0                               264899                      264899
  4        HFCL Infotel Ltd                    8593                             1606500                     1615093
  5          IDEA Mobile                     40672096                           41106559                    81778655
  6          Loop Mobile                         0                              3044579                     3044579
         Reliance Telecom +
                                             27082621                           98569506                   125652127
   7     Communications Ltd
   8       Sistema Shyam                       1935360                        6498307                        8433667
   9             STEL                          611031                         1704493                        2315524
  10    TATA Teleservices Ltd.                17898628                       66334770                       84233398
  11            Uninor                         5560484                       12949565                       18510049
  12           Videocon                           0                           7319603                        7319603
  13       Vodafone Essar                     47761849                       76493271                      124255120
  14         Private Total                   220109564                      439977180                      660086744
  15             BSNL                         30790563                       55918974                       86709537
  16             MTNL                             0                           5403754                        5403754
  17          PSU Total                      30790563                        61322728                       92113291
  18             India                       250900127                      501299908                      752200035

Source: TRAI Annual Report 2009-10


   80000000

   70000000

   60000000

   50000000

   40000000

   30000000

   20000000

   10000000

           0
                1   2     3    4    5    6     7   8        9   10    11   12    13    14   15   16   17    18

               Mobile Telephones Rural       Mobile Telephones Urban            Mobile Telephones Total


Source: Based on the above table (author’s work)
                                                       35
TABLE - 1.4
    Rate of Growth in Postpaid and Prepaid Mobile Subscribers in India
                                      (2000 to 2004)
                                     Growth rate of                   Growth rate of prepaid
Financial Year
                                  postpaid subscribers                    subscribers
              2000                         NA                                  NA
              2001                        40%                                 96%
              2002                        57%                                 157%
              2003                        14%                                 98%
              2004                       124%                                 168%

Source: www.trai.gov.in


                  Growth rate of postpaid subscribers

                                                  2001
                                                  40%

                                         2004          2002
                                         124%          57%


                                                         2003
                                                         14%



                   Growth rate of prepaid subscribers

                                                      2001
                                      2004            96%
                                      168%


                                                        2002
                                          2003          157%
                                          98%



                          Source: Based on the above table (author’s work)
                                                 36
TABLE - 1.5
                                 Company-wise Market Share and Technology Used
                                  by Subscriber Base of Mobile Operators in India
                                                             (March, 2005)

     Sl. No.        Cellular Group             Subscribers on March, 05            Market Share          Technology Used

        1      Bharti Grp                           10,984,280                          21                   GSM
        2      Reliance Grp                         10,446,053                          20               GSM & CDMA
        3      BSNL                                  9,899,425                          19               GSM & CDMA
        4      Hutchison Grp                         7,797,720                         14.9                  GSM
        5      IDEA Grp                              5,069,693                          9.7                  GSM
        6      BPL Grp                               2,575,387                          4.9                  GSM
        7      Spice Grp                             1,438,824                          2.8                  GSM
        8      Aircel Grp                            1,755,350                          3.4                  GSM
        9      Tata Teleservices                     1,089,500                          2.1                 CDMA
       10      MTNL                                  1,078,143                          2.1              GSM & CDMA
       11      HFCL                                    53,163                           0.1                 CDMA
       12      Shyam Telelink                          27,663                           0.1                 CDMA
       13      Total Subscribers                    52,215,201                         100               GSM & CDMA




                        Different Cellular Group Subscribers on March, 05
       60,000,000
       50,000,000
       40,000,000
       30,000,000
       20,000,000                                                                             Subscribers on March, 05
       10,000,000
                    0
                        1    2       3     4   5   6     7   8    9   10 11 12 13



                            Market Share of Different Cellular Groups
                                            Tata    MTNL
                                        Teleservices 2%
                                             2%            Shyam
                             Spice Grp
                                                     HFCL Telelink
                                3%     Aircel Grp     0%     0%
                               BPL Grp     3%
                                 5%                     Bharti Grp
                        IDEA Grp
                          10%                             21%

                                         Hutchison Grp                       Reliance Grp
                                             15%                                 20%
                                                             BSNL
                                                             19%




Source Of table: www.vision2020planningcommission.nic.in
Source of Graph: Based on the above table (author’s work)


                                                                 37
600000

  500000

  400000

  300000

  200000

  100000

       0
           1   2   3   4   5    6   7   8      9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
                                            Operators
                               Total Port In         Total Port Out

Source of Table: www.trai.gov.in
Source of Graph: Based on the above table (author’s work)

                                                                      38
TABLE - 1.7
         Circle-wise Population and Area Covered under Mobile Telephone

                           Services in India (As on 30.06.2010)
    Circle                          Population Covered                        Area Covered (Sq. Km.)
    Andaman & Nicobar                            316000                                797
    Andhra Pradesh                              67334977                             220326
    Assam                                       20860000                              39338
    Bihar                                       53006472                              59650
    Chhattisgarh                                13378309                              60411
    Gujarat                                     41997127                             110680
    Haryana                                     16544108                              32489
    Himachal Pradesh                            3624010                               30113
    Jammu and Kashmir                           6388782                               31793
    Jharkhand                                   11603207                              35285
    Karnataka                                   37167579                             101760
    Kerala                                      30162136                              35536
    Madhya Pradesh                              27736320                             118774
    Maharashtra                                 68843231                             106563
    North East-1                                3333021                               21772
    North East-2                                2519283                               20046
    Orissa                                      25278005                             102912
    Punjab                                      23304386                              45933
    Rajasthan                                   43729884                             164315
    Tamil Nadu                                  50516502                              93794
    Uttarakhand                                 5154923                               35039
    Uttar Pradesh East                          80822915                             140798
    Uttar Pradesh West                          25831170                              44051
    West Bengal                                 28737425                              27175
    Kolkatta TD                                 13214676                              2200
    Chennai TD                                  9975869                               4913
    Total                                     711380317                              1686463




Population Covered           Area Covered (Sq.                   Andaman & Nicobar           Andhra Pradesh
                                                                 Assam                       Bihar
                                   Km.)                          Chhattisgarh                Gujarat
                                                                 Haryana                     Himachal Pradesh
                                                                 Jammu and Kashmir           Jharkhand
                                                                 Karnataka                   Kerala
                                                                 Madhya Pradesh              Maharashtra
                                                                 North East-1                North East-2
                                                                 Orissa                      Punjab
                                                                 Rajasthan                   Tamil Nadu
                                                                 Uttarakhand                 Uttar Pradesh East
                                                                 Uttar Pradesh West          West Bengal
                                                                 Kolkatta TD                 Chennai TD
                                                                 Total

                              Source of Table: TRAI Annual Report 2009-10
                         Source of Graph: Based on the above table (author’s work)
                                                    39
Source: www.vision2020planningcommission.nic.in




       100
        90
        80
        70
                                                        No. of Telephone (in
        60
                                                        Million) Fixed
        50                                              (Landline+WLL)
        40                                              No. of Telephone (in
        30                                              Million) Mobile

        20
        10
          0
              1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006


Source: Based on the above table (author’s work)



                                                   40
TABLE - 1.9
                          Subscriber Base of Mobile (GSM and CDMA) Services in India
                                                   (March, 2000 to 2009)
                                                        (in Million)
                                                                                                        %
                                                                                                                           %
                                                                                                     Growth
                                                                                                                         Growth
                                                                                                      Over
Service      Mar, Mar,     Mar, Mar,       Mar,      Mar,      Mar,       Mar,                                            Over
                                                                                    Mar, 08 Mar, 09  March,
Providers     00   01       02   03         04        05        06         07                                           Financial
                                                                                                      2005
                                                                                                                          Year
                                                                                                      (One
                                                                                                                          2008
                                                                                                      Year)
  Bharti    0.36   0.69    1.35   3.07   6.5        10.98     19.58      37.14      61.98   93.92   78.32%             51.53%
  BSNL                     0.04   2.29   5.53       9.9       17.65      30.99      40.79   52.15   78.28%             58.70%
 Reliance   0.07   0.19    0.38   0.54   7.26       10.45     17.31      28.01      45.79       72.67      65.65%      55.84%
  Hutch     0.45   0.71    1.27   2.16   5.15       7.8       15.36      26.44      44.13       68.77      96.92%      27.85%
   Tata                    0.05   0.16   0.63       1.09      4.85       16.02      24.33       35.12      344.95%     44.35%
   Idea     0.16   0.34    0.81   1.28   2.73
                                                    5.07      7.37       14.01      24          38.89      45.36%      62.03%
 Escotel    0.14   0.31    0.5    0.59   0.99
  Aircel    -      -       0.54   0.73   1.29       1.76      2.61       5.51       10.61       18.48      48.30%      74.18%
  MTNL             0.02    0.22   0.35   0.46       1.08      2.05       2.94       3.53        4.48       89.81%      26.91%
  Spice     0.17   0.27    0.47   0.64   1.21       1.44      1.93       2.73       4.21        4.13       34.03%      -1.90%
   BPL      0.34   0.64    0.9    1.13   1.88       2.58      1.34       1.07       1.29        2.16       -48.06%*    67.44%
  HFCL                     0.01   0.03   0.03       0.05      0.06       0.15       0.3         0.6        20.00%      30.00%
 Sistema                   0      0.03   0.03       0.03      0.03       0.1        0.11        0.39       0%          445.45%
   Total    1.9    3.58    6.54   13     33.69      52.23     90.14      165.1      261.07      391.76     72.62%      50.06%


  250
                                                                                                                           Mar, 09
  200                                                                                                                      Mar, 08
                                                                                                                           Mar, 07
  150
                                                                                                                           Mar, 06
                                                                                                                           Mar, 05
  100
                                                                                                                           Mar, 04
    50                                                                                                                     Mar, 03
                                                                                                                           Mar, 02
     0
                                                                                                                           Mar, 01
                                                                                                                           Mar, 00


                                      Sistema, 0                                          Bharti, 51.5 BSNL, 58.70
 Spice, 34. BPL , 0 HFCL, 20.
                              Bharti, 78. %                                                   3%           % Reliance, 55
    03% MTNL, 89. 00%           32% BSNL, 78.
      Aircel                                                                                                      .84% Hutch, 27.8
              81%                         28%
    , 48.30%                                                                                                                5%
       %age                         Reliance,                         Sistema, 44                           Tata, 44.35
  Escot Idea, 45.3
       growth                        65.65%                              5.45%                                   %
                                                                                                                    Idea, 62.03
       over 6%
 el, 0.0
   0% March, 05                     Hutch, 96.                                                              Escotel, 0.0 %
                                        92%                                                                     0%
    %age                                                        %age                                    MTNL, 26.9
    growth          Tata, 344.
                                                                growth                                       1%
    over               95%                                                               HFCL, 30.00 BPL Spice, - Aircel
                                                                over FY                      % , 67.44%
    March, 05                                                                                             1.90% , 74.18%
                                                                2008
Source of Table: www.indiastat.com and Source of Graph: Based on the above table (author’s work)
                                                               41
Source: www.trai.gov.in




   25000000


   20000000

                                                                                                        Total
   15000000                                                                                             "C" Circles
                                                                                                        "B" Circles
   10000000                                                                                             "A" Circles
                                                                                                        Metros
   50000000


          0
              Mar, 99   Mar, 00   Mar, 01   Mar, 02   Mar, 03   Mar, 04   Mar, 05   Mar, 06   Mar, 07




Source: Based on the above table (author’s work)




                                                           42
TOP 5 MOBILE OPERATORS' SUBSCRIBER BASE IN
                                   INIDA
            Subscriber Base (in million) March '2003    Subscriber Base (in million) March '2004




                                     6.5
                                                5.53           5.15
                   7.26
                                                                                2.73
                                     3.07       2.29           2.16
                   0.54                                                         1.28

                Reliance           Bharti      BSNL        Hutchison            Idea



             % age share on March                            % age share on March
                     2003                                            2004
                               Reliance
                      Idea       4.15                                      Idea
                                                              Hutchis                  Reliance
                      9.85                                                  8.1
           Hutchis                                              on                      21.55
                                      Bharti                  15.29
             on
                                      23.62                             BSNL      Bharti
            16.62          BSNL
                           17.62                                        16.41     19.29




Source of Table: www.indiastat.com and Source of Graph: Based on the above table (author’s work)

                                                   43
Source: www.vision2020planningsommission.nic.in




         8

         7

         6
                                                                   Postpaid RPM (Rs.)
         5
                                                                   Postpaid % Change
         4                                                         Prepaid RPM (Rs.)
                                                                   Prepaid % Change
         3
                                                                   Blended RPM (Rs.)
         2                                                         Blended % Change

         1

         0
                2000       2001        2002       2003      2004
        -1


Source of Graph: Based on the above table (author’s work)




                                                  44
Table 1.13
                            GROWTH OF TELE-DENSITY
                               FROM 2005-2010
                                                          GROWTH OF
                                 YEAR
                                                         TELEDENSITY
                                 2005                            9.08
                                 2006                            12.86
                                 2007                            18.23
                                 2008                            26.22
                                 2009                            36.98
                                 2010                            52.74


Source: TRAI Annual Report 2009-10




                                 GROWTH OF TELE-DENSITY
     60
                                                                             52.74
     50

     40
                                                                   36.98
     30
                                                         26.22                       GROWTH OF TELEDENSITY
     20                                        18.23
                                    12.86
     10                   9.08
      0
                   2005      2006       2007      2008      2009      2010


                           Source: Based on the above table (author’s work)

                                                       45
Table1.14 FORECASTING THE TOTAL LANDLINE SUBSCRBERS AND TOTAL
MOBILE SUBCRIBERS UPTO 2014-2015

          YEAR                   TOTAL LANDLINE    TOTAL MOBILE
                                  SUBSCRIBERS      SUBSCRIBERS
        1999-2000                     4450956          3107449
        2000-2001                     5927282          5478932
        2001-2002                     7802196         10480430
        2002-2003                     9598174         21991743
        2003-2004                    12784986         37378807
        2004-2005                    22491031         58503224
        2005-2006                    30684519        105425183
        2006-2007                    40753412        172219135
        2007-2008                    58044671        258235642
        2008-2009                    79315081        380447562
        2009-2010                   106197268        494036000
        2010-2011                   114419076        553685876
        2011-2012                   135196481        660238164
        2012-2013                   155809740        763813825
        2013-2014                   174632855        861100772
        2014-2015                   192215452        950802215
Source: www.trai.gov.in




Source: Based on the above table (author’s work)


                                         46
Table 1.15 OPERATOR WISE GROWTH OF TELECOM SECTORS IN
    SUBBSCRIBER BASE ( IN MILLIONS).

OPERA 1999-     2000-    2001- 2002-     2003-       2004-   2005-   2006    2007    2008    2009-
-TORS 2000      2001     2002 2003       2004        2005    2006    -       -       -       2010
                                                                     2007    2008    2009
BHARTI   0.36   0.69     1.35   3.07     6.5         10.98   19.58   37.14   61.98   93.92   107.204
AIRTEL
IDEA     0.16   0.34     0.81   1.28     2.73        5.07    7.37    14.01   24      38.89   43.149
RELIAN   0.07   0.19     0.38   0.54     7.26        10.45   17.31   28.01   45.79   72.67   80.722
CE
VODAF    0.45   0.71     1.27   2.16     5.15        7.8     15.36   26.44   44.13   68.77   77.713
ONE
(HUTCH
)
SPICE    0.17   0.27     0.47   0.64     1.21        1.44    1.93    2.73    4.21    4.13    5.186
    Source: www.indiastat.com




    Source: Based on the above table (author’s work)




                                                47
Table1.16 SERVICE REVENUE OF INDIAN TELECOM OPERATORS (Rs./Crore).

  TELECOM          2008-2009       2009-2010       2010-2011   2011-2012
 OPERATORS
   BHARTI            37352           41847          59476       65060
   AIRTEL
  RELIANCE           22250           22132          23107       31468
    IDEA             10154           12447          15503       16963
    MTNL              4587            3751           4380        4380
    HCFL              139             204            204         204
Source: Reliance Communications Ltd.




Source: Based on the above table (author’s work)




                                         48
Table 1.17 CORRELATION BETWEEN MOBILE CALL RATES AND TOTAL MOBILE
SUBSCRIBERS.


               YEAR                          APPROXIMATE MOBILE             TOTAL MOBILE
                                             CALL RATES (AVERAGE            SUBSCRIBERS
                                                  OF ALL THE
                                              OPERATORS ACROSS
                                              ALL THE OPERATOS)
        1999-2000                                      5                       3107449
        2000-2001                                      5                       5478932
        2001-2002                                    4.28                     10480430
        2002-2003                                    3.96                     21991743
        2003-2004                                    3.37                     37378807
        2004-2005                                    3.19                     58503224
        2005-2006                                    2.25                    105425183
        2006-2007                                    1.19                    172219135
        2007-2008                                    1.76                    258235642
        2008-2009                                    0.94                    380447562
        2009-2010                                    0.50                    494036000
Source: www.trai.gov.in

Correlations

                                            VAR00002           VAR00003
                                                                       **
VAR00002        Pearson Correlation         1                  -.889

                Sig. (2-tailed)                                .000

                N                           11                 11
                                                    **
VAR00003        Pearson Correlation         -.889              1

                Sig. (2-tailed)             .000

                N                           11                 11

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).


VAR00002: MOBILE CALL RATES
VAR00003: TOTAL SUBSCRIBERS

Source: Based on the above table (author’s work)




                                                                   49
Table 1.18 TREND IN REVENUE EARNED PER MINUTE (INCOMING + OUTGOING)
FOR ALL GSM OPERATORS.

          YEAR                       POSTPAID        PREPAID
        1999-2000                      6.55            7.32
        2000-2001                      4.82            5.65
        2001-2002                      3.67            5.43
        2002-2003                      2.55            3.49
        2003-2004                      1.79            1.39
Source: www.indiastat.com




Source: Based on the above table (author’s work)




                                         50
Table 1.19 Factor Analysis
                                                                    Correlation Matrix

                                            Family
                                            Member                                                      Recharge                   Payment/
                          Local Call       Using The Call
                                                   Free Convenience          PromotionalRoaming Internet Coupon Friend Family
                                                                                                                           Messaging
                                                                                                                                   Recharge
                                                                                                                                          Customer
                                                                                                                                                Popularity Of
                            RateSTD Call Rate
                                            Network Service Paying Bills
                                                          In       Connectivity Offers connectivity
                                                                                                  Access
                                                                                                       Availability Group Pack Kiosk Care the Company
 Correlation Call Rate 1.000
          Local                      .143 .105 .240 -.222 .203 -.123 .157 .159 .010                                    .045 .227 .038 .033            .101
          STD Call Rate .143 1.000 .027 .033                    .107 .166          .106 .424 .229 -.283                .057 -.039 -.159 .074          .122
          Family Member Using
                             .105    .027 1.000 .271            .016 .345          .153 .103 .131 .312                 .491 .116 .225 .250            .098
          The Network
          Free Call Service .240     .033 .271 1.000            .132 .288          .190 .344 .058 .249                 .380 .216 .134 .319            .109
          Convenience In Paying
                            -.222    .107 .016 .132 1.000 .046                     .021 .125 .060 -.201                .121 -.004 .128 .189           .020
          Bills
          Connectivity       .203    .166 .345 .288             .046 1.000 -.014 .364 .210 .044                        .383 .174 .289 .444            .298
          Promotional Offers-.123    .106 .153 .190             .021 -.014 1.000 .195 .088 .272                        .147 .244 .105 .067            .180
          Roaming connectivity
                             .157    .424 .103 .344             .125 .364          .195 1.000 .470 -.218               .197 .044 -.067 .338           .083
          Internet Access .159       .229 .131 .058             .060 .210          .088 .470 1.000 -.113               .072 .035 -.046 .104 -.003
          Recharge Coupon
                             .010 -.283 .312 .249 -.201 .044                       .272 -.218 -.113 1.000              .148 .318 .215 .105            .129
          Availability
          Friend Family Group.045    .057 .491 .380             .121 .383          .147 .197 .072 .148 1.000 .295 .220 .399                           .319
          Messaging Pack .227 -.039 .116 .216 -.004 .174                           .244 .044 .035 .318                 .295 1.000 .229 .267           .444
          Payment/ Recharge Kiosk -.159 .225 .134
                             .038                               .128 .289          .105 -.067 -.046 .215               .220 .229 1.000 .383           .107
          Customer Care .033         .074 .250 .319             .189 .444          .067 .338 .104 .105                 .399 .267 .383 1.000           .175
          Popularity Of the
                             .101    .122 .098 .109             .020 .298          .180 .083 -.003 .129                .319 .444 .107 .175 1.000
          Company



                         KMO and Bartlett's Test
   Kaiser-Mey er-Olkin Measure of Sampling
   Adequacy .                                                              .664

   Bart let t's Test of            Approx. Chi-Square                 343.678
   Sphericity                      df                                     105
                                   Sig.                                  .000



The KMO value being above .500 denotes that the sample size was adequate.
The Significance being .000 denotes that there was no fraudulent data.




                                                                         51
Communalities

                                          Initial    Extraction
 Local Call Rate                            1.000         .706
 STD Call Rat e                             1.000         .557
 Family Member Using
                                             1.000         .578
 The Network
 Free Call Serv ice                          1.000         .451
 Conv enience In Pay ing
                                             1.000         .627
 Bills
 Connectiv ity                               1.000         .619
 Promotional Of f ers                        1.000         .775
 Roaming connect iv it y                     1.000         .744
 Internet Access                             1.000         .467
 Recharge Coupon
                                             1.000         .723
 Av ailabilit y
 Friend Family Group                         1.000         .524
 Messaging Pack                              1.000         .680
 Pay ment/ Recharge Kiosk                    1.000         .505
 Customer Care                               1.000         .594
 Popularity Of the
                                             1.000         .724
 Company
 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analy sis.




                                                         Total Variance Explained

                           Initial Eigenvalues            Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings      Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
Component        Total     % of Variance Cumulativ e %    Total     % of Variance Cumulativ e %   Total     % of Variance Cumulativ e %
1                  3.414            22.763      22.763      3.414         22.763         22.763     2.779         18.525         18.525
2                  2.079            13.857      36.620      2.079         13.857         36.620     2.129         14.193         32.718
3                  1.393             9.288      45.908      1.393           9.288        45.908     1.567         10.448         43.166
4                  1.245             8.298      54.206      1.245           8.298        54.206     1.430           9.534        52.700
5                  1.144             7.625      61.831      1.144           7.625        61.831     1.370           9.131        61.831
6                   .917             6.111      67.942
7                   .882             5.881      73.822
8                   .736             4.907      78.729
9                   .699             4.663      83.392
10                  .561             3.741      87.133
11                  .533             3.557      90.690
12                  .406             2.709      93.399
13                  .384             2.560      95.959
14                  .326             2.172      98.131
15                  .280             1.869     100.000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analy sis.

                                                                  52
a
                                   Component Matrix

                                                          Component
                                 1               2           3                   4               5
Local Call Rate                   .273            .141        .644               -.434           -.094
STD Call Rate                     .202            .658        .136                .225           -.120
Family Member Using
                                  .570           -.173           -.052           -.172            .437
The Network
Free Call Serv ice                .606           -.015           .031            -.029            .287
Conv enience In Pay ing
                                  .157            .220           -.696            .205           -.166
Bills
Connect iv ity                    .676            .166           -.040           -.341           -.126
Promotional Of f ers              .327           -.130            .081            .754            .276
Roaming connectiv it y            .494            .678            .049            .124            .150
Internet Access                   .288            .540            .164            .039            .253
Recharge Coupon
                                  .295           -.686           .211             .118            .327
Av ailabilit y
Friend Family Group               .698           -.109           -.155           -.027            .024
Messaging Pack                    .523           -.333            .299            .235           -.388
Pay ment/ Recharge Kiosk          .428           -.371           -.338           -.230           -.129
Customer Care                     .664            .025           -.337           -.162           -.113
Popularity Of the
                                  .469           -.135           .222             .287           -.595
Company
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analy sis.
  a. 5 components extract ed.




                           Component Transformation Matrix

      Component          1               2               3               4               5
      1                   .833            .307            .396            .229            .052
      2                  -.138            .900           -.191           -.349           -.112
      3                  -.311            .191            .291            .177            .867
      4                  -.407            .218            .357            .675           -.452
      5                   .156            .108           -.771            .583            .172
      Extraction Method: Principal Component Analy sis.
      Rotation Met hod: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.




                                             53
From the above Rotated Factor Analysis we have come out with new factors which
are the bases for selecting a network:

Factor 1-Free call services within family or a groups.

Factor 2- STD facilities and Internet Services being provided.

Factor 3- The popularity of the company.

Factor 4- Recharge booths should be located close by.

Factor 5- Local call rates should be low and payment process should be easy.

From the table of total variance explained we see the cumulative importance of
each of the above five factors. The total cumulative importances of these five
factors are 61.831%.

The individual importances of each of the factors are:

Factor 1- 18.525 %

Factor 2- 14.193%

Factor 3- 10.448%

Fator 4- 9.534%

Factor 5- 9.131%

These factors together make up the five most important factors of the analysis.

The rotated component matrix converges after 10 rotations to signify that none of
the factors are similar in nature and that the sample size is adequate.




                                         54
BIBLIOGRAPHY
 1.
      India Today
 2.
      Economic Times
 3.
      Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India (TRAI) Annual report 2009-2010

 4.
      www.ibef.org/industry/telecommunications.aspx

 5.
      Vision2020planningcommission.nic.in/reports/genrep/bkpap2020/1_bg2020.doc

 6.
      http://www.indiastat.com/telecommunication/data.htm

 7.
      http://www.currentanalysis.com/markets/telecomindustry/?gclid=COX74bLX7KsCFcka6
      wodnywLPA
 8.
      http://www.trai.gov.in
 9.
      EIS in our college library

10.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_in_India

11.
      economictimes.indiatimes.com/Market

12.
      www.cci.in/pdf/surveys_reports/indias_telecom_sector.pdf

13.
      http://www.dot.gov.in/osp/Brochure/Brochure.htm
14.
      http://www.pppinindia.com/pdf/ppp_position_paper_telecom_122k9.pdf

15.
      Company Sites www.vodafone.in and www.airtel.in exim.indiamart.com › Indian
      Budget › Budget 2009-2010

16.
      http://www.articlesbase.com/communication-articles/indian-telecom-industry-key-
      milestones-3134671.html

17.
      http://www.sibm.edu.in/Final_Pre_Budget_Analysis_2010.pdf

18.
      http://www.telecomindiaonline.com/cmai-budget-recendations-for-fy-2010-11.html
                                            55
19.
      http://www.telecomindiaonline.com/telecom-reports-on-telecom-kiosk-at-telecom-india-
      daily.html

20.
      www.dnb.co.in/IndianTelecomIndustry/OverviewTI.asp

21.
      www.tradechakra.com › ... › Industries

22.
      www.indialawoffices.com/pdf/telecommunication.pdf

23.
      business.mapsofindia.com › Communications Industry

24.
      planningcommission.nic.in/reports/genrep/.../1_bg2020.doc

25.
      siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRADE/.../Singh.pdf –

26.
      www.cci.in/pdf/surveys_reports/indias_telecom_sector.pdf

27.
      http://telecomtalk.info/india-officially-scaled-the-500-million-telecom-subscriber-
      base/11971/

28.
      http://www.trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/trai/upload/PressReleases/706/pr4nov09no73.pdf

29.
      http://www.coai.com/docs/ARPU Revenue Analysis - Oct-Dec 09-FINAL.xls

30.
      http://www.siliconindia.com/shownews/Network_congestion_increases_in_major_cities-
      nid-29716.html

31.
      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34509513/ & Electricsense.com article, 2010,

32.
      Das, N.G., Statistical Methods Volume 1, Tata Mcgraw Hill Publications, New Delhi,
      Pages: 27-36, 287-398.

33.
      http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/forecasting.asp

34.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_prediction



                                               56
QUESTIONAIRE



NAME:

AGE:

OCCUPATION:

CONTACT NUMBER:

INCOME: <10000         10000-25000         >25000         (PER MONTH)

GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:

MONTHLY EXPENDITURE:

PREPAID        POSTPAID




The Grading system followed below is as follows:

   1.   Not Important at All
   2.   Not So Important
   3.   Important
   4.   Very Important
   5.   Extremely important




                                                   57
WHILE SELECTING A CONNECTION HOW MUCH IMPORTANCE WOULD YOU GIVE TO THE FOLLOWING
FACTORS

                 FACTORS               1          2         3          4           5


LOCAL CALL RATES


STD CALL RATES


FAMILY MEMBERS USING A NETWORK


FREE CALL SERVICE WIYHIN THE SAME
NETWORK AND OUTSIDE THE NETWORK
CONVENIENCE IN PAYING BILLS


STRENGHT OF CONNECTIVITY(NETWORK)


FREQUENT PROMOTIONAL OFFERS


ROAMING CONNECTIVITY


INTERNET CONNECTIVITY


AVAILABILITY OF RECHARGE COUPONS


FAMILY/FRIEND GROUPS


MESSAGING PACKS


CLOSENESS OF PAYMENT/RECHARGE
KIOSK
NATURE AND EFFICIENCY OF CUSTOMER
CARE
POPULARITY OF THE COMPANY


                                        58
HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE FOLLOWING FACTORS OF THE NETWORK YOU ARE CURRENTLY ON :



                 FACTORS                1          2         3          4        5


LOCAL CALL RATES


STD CALL RATES


FAMILY MEMBERS USING A NETWORK


FREE CALL SERVICE WIYHIN THE SAME
NETWORK AND OUTSIDE THE NETWORK
CONVENIENCE IN PAYING BILLS


STRENGHT OF CONNECTIVITY(NETWORK)


FREQUENT PROMOTIONAL OFFERS


ROAMING CONNECTIVITY


INTERNET CONNECTIVITY


AVAILABILITY OF RECHARGE COUPONS


FAMILY/FRIEND GROUPS


MESSAGING PACKS


CLOSENESS OF PAYMENT/RECHARGE
KIOSK

NATURE AND EFFICIENCY OF CUSTOMER
CARE
POPULARITY OF THE COMPANY



                                        59

More Related Content

What's hot

Telecom industry 27, 28, 63
Telecom industry 27, 28, 63Telecom industry 27, 28, 63
Telecom industry 27, 28, 63domsr
 
Indian telecom industry past, present & future
Indian telecom industry  past, present & futureIndian telecom industry  past, present & future
Indian telecom industry past, present & futureReeha Paul
 
Telecom ppt 1st part
Telecom ppt 1st partTelecom ppt 1st part
Telecom ppt 1st partWEBD2012
 
Indian telecom industry-economics
Indian telecom industry-economicsIndian telecom industry-economics
Indian telecom industry-economicsAjit Kumar
 
The Price War of Telecommunication Giants in India
The Price War of Telecommunication Giants in IndiaThe Price War of Telecommunication Giants in India
The Price War of Telecommunication Giants in IndiaSubham Chauhan
 
Telecom industry in india
Telecom industry in indiaTelecom industry in india
Telecom industry in indiadeepu2000
 
Report on telecom sector
Report on telecom sectorReport on telecom sector
Report on telecom sectorJonty Mohta
 
Indian Telecom Sector – Witnessing a Revolution
Indian Telecom Sector – Witnessing a RevolutionIndian Telecom Sector – Witnessing a Revolution
Indian Telecom Sector – Witnessing a RevolutionIOSR Journals
 
Telecom Industry OverView
Telecom Industry OverViewTelecom Industry OverView
Telecom Industry OverViewYashuu Parekh
 
Comparative study of telecom sector
Comparative study of telecom sectorComparative study of telecom sector
Comparative study of telecom sectorNirankar Royal
 
Indian Telecom Industry
Indian Telecom IndustryIndian Telecom Industry
Indian Telecom IndustryAshish Nangla
 
Telecom demo pack
Telecom demo packTelecom demo pack
Telecom demo packsaswatad
 

What's hot (20)

Telecom industry 27, 28, 63
Telecom industry 27, 28, 63Telecom industry 27, 28, 63
Telecom industry 27, 28, 63
 
Indian telecom industry past, present & future
Indian telecom industry  past, present & futureIndian telecom industry  past, present & future
Indian telecom industry past, present & future
 
Telecom industry in india
Telecom industry in indiaTelecom industry in india
Telecom industry in india
 
Telecom ppt 1st part
Telecom ppt 1st partTelecom ppt 1st part
Telecom ppt 1st part
 
Indian telecom industry-economics
Indian telecom industry-economicsIndian telecom industry-economics
Indian telecom industry-economics
 
The Price War of Telecommunication Giants in India
The Price War of Telecommunication Giants in IndiaThe Price War of Telecommunication Giants in India
The Price War of Telecommunication Giants in India
 
Telecommunication Sector Report - March 2017
Telecommunication Sector Report - March 2017Telecommunication Sector Report - March 2017
Telecommunication Sector Report - March 2017
 
Major players in telecom industry
Major players in telecom industryMajor players in telecom industry
Major players in telecom industry
 
India :Telecommunication Sector Report_August 2013
India :Telecommunication Sector Report_August 2013India :Telecommunication Sector Report_August 2013
India :Telecommunication Sector Report_August 2013
 
Telecom industry in india
Telecom industry in indiaTelecom industry in india
Telecom industry in india
 
Report on telecom sector
Report on telecom sectorReport on telecom sector
Report on telecom sector
 
Reliance Com project.docx
Reliance Com project.docxReliance Com project.docx
Reliance Com project.docx
 
Telecom industry copy
Telecom industry   copyTelecom industry   copy
Telecom industry copy
 
Indian Telecom Sector – Witnessing a Revolution
Indian Telecom Sector – Witnessing a RevolutionIndian Telecom Sector – Witnessing a Revolution
Indian Telecom Sector – Witnessing a Revolution
 
Telecom Industry OverView
Telecom Industry OverViewTelecom Industry OverView
Telecom Industry OverView
 
Comparative study of telecom sector
Comparative study of telecom sectorComparative study of telecom sector
Comparative study of telecom sector
 
Telecom Industry in India
Telecom Industry in IndiaTelecom Industry in India
Telecom Industry in India
 
Ibef telecommunications 2010
Ibef telecommunications  2010Ibef telecommunications  2010
Ibef telecommunications 2010
 
Indian Telecom Industry
Indian Telecom IndustryIndian Telecom Industry
Indian Telecom Industry
 
Telecom demo pack
Telecom demo packTelecom demo pack
Telecom demo pack
 

Similar to Project completed copy

Rate war in telecom sector
Rate war in telecom sectorRate war in telecom sector
Rate war in telecom sectorRitesh Goyal
 
Rate war in telecom sector
Rate war in telecom sectorRate war in telecom sector
Rate war in telecom sectorRitesh Goyal
 
32932654 telecom-industry-profile
32932654 telecom-industry-profile32932654 telecom-industry-profile
32932654 telecom-industry-profilebhavana2santhapur
 
Report on telecom sector
Report on telecom sectorReport on telecom sector
Report on telecom sectorsumanmalviya
 
Rate war of cellular in india
Rate war of cellular in indiaRate war of cellular in india
Rate war of cellular in indiaJay Sanghrajka
 
Vodafone report final
Vodafone report finalVodafone report final
Vodafone report finalShri Theja
 
mba project on vodafone
mba project on vodafonemba project on vodafone
mba project on vodafoneProjects Kart
 
barriers and use case study of mobile internet for the age group above 40-- A...
barriers and use case study of mobile internet for the age group above 40-- A...barriers and use case study of mobile internet for the age group above 40-- A...
barriers and use case study of mobile internet for the age group above 40-- A...Shwetanshu Gupta
 
Vodafone - Market Survey in Pune
Vodafone - Market Survey in PuneVodafone - Market Survey in Pune
Vodafone - Market Survey in Punejitesh1406
 
Customer satisfaction among b2 b customers of relience communication in tamil...
Customer satisfaction among b2 b customers of relience communication in tamil...Customer satisfaction among b2 b customers of relience communication in tamil...
Customer satisfaction among b2 b customers of relience communication in tamil...Mohan Suyamburaj
 
Marketing Strategies of Bharti Airtel
Marketing Strategies of Bharti AirtelMarketing Strategies of Bharti Airtel
Marketing Strategies of Bharti AirtelShreya Mishra
 
F figure3
F figure3F figure3
F figure3vinuhr
 
Marketing Strategies of Bharti Airtel in Northeast
Marketing Strategies of Bharti Airtel in NortheastMarketing Strategies of Bharti Airtel in Northeast
Marketing Strategies of Bharti Airtel in Northeastluchercrisis
 
Indian telecom service providers
Indian telecom service providersIndian telecom service providers
Indian telecom service providersPraveen Sidola
 
Effect of Reliance Jio Promotion activites on Customers.pdf
Effect of Reliance Jio Promotion activites on Customers.pdfEffect of Reliance Jio Promotion activites on Customers.pdf
Effect of Reliance Jio Promotion activites on Customers.pdfNitesh Kumar Mishra
 
Marketing research
Marketing researchMarketing research
Marketing researchSapna Sood
 

Similar to Project completed copy (20)

Rate war in telecom sector
Rate war in telecom sectorRate war in telecom sector
Rate war in telecom sector
 
Rate war in telecom sector
Rate war in telecom sectorRate war in telecom sector
Rate war in telecom sector
 
Final mrp
Final mrpFinal mrp
Final mrp
 
32932654 telecom-industry-profile
32932654 telecom-industry-profile32932654 telecom-industry-profile
32932654 telecom-industry-profile
 
Report on telecom sector
Report on telecom sectorReport on telecom sector
Report on telecom sector
 
Rate war of cellular in india
Rate war of cellular in indiaRate war of cellular in india
Rate war of cellular in india
 
Vodafone report final
Vodafone report finalVodafone report final
Vodafone report final
 
mba project on vodafone
mba project on vodafonemba project on vodafone
mba project on vodafone
 
barriers and use case study of mobile internet for the age group above 40-- A...
barriers and use case study of mobile internet for the age group above 40-- A...barriers and use case study of mobile internet for the age group above 40-- A...
barriers and use case study of mobile internet for the age group above 40-- A...
 
Vodafone - Market Survey in Pune
Vodafone - Market Survey in PuneVodafone - Market Survey in Pune
Vodafone - Market Survey in Pune
 
Customer satisfaction among b2 b customers of relience communication in tamil...
Customer satisfaction among b2 b customers of relience communication in tamil...Customer satisfaction among b2 b customers of relience communication in tamil...
Customer satisfaction among b2 b customers of relience communication in tamil...
 
Marketing Strategies of Bharti Airtel
Marketing Strategies of Bharti AirtelMarketing Strategies of Bharti Airtel
Marketing Strategies of Bharti Airtel
 
Vodafone
VodafoneVodafone
Vodafone
 
F figure3
F figure3F figure3
F figure3
 
Marketing Strategies of Bharti Airtel in Northeast
Marketing Strategies of Bharti Airtel in NortheastMarketing Strategies of Bharti Airtel in Northeast
Marketing Strategies of Bharti Airtel in Northeast
 
Indian telecom service providers
Indian telecom service providersIndian telecom service providers
Indian telecom service providers
 
Effect of Reliance Jio Promotion activites on Customers.pdf
Effect of Reliance Jio Promotion activites on Customers.pdfEffect of Reliance Jio Promotion activites on Customers.pdf
Effect of Reliance Jio Promotion activites on Customers.pdf
 
Marketing research
Marketing researchMarketing research
Marketing research
 
Ravi rupani.
Ravi rupani.Ravi rupani.
Ravi rupani.
 
Marketing stratagy of nokia and samsung by raghav
Marketing stratagy of nokia and samsung by raghavMarketing stratagy of nokia and samsung by raghav
Marketing stratagy of nokia and samsung by raghav
 

Project completed copy

  • 1. INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATED LEARNING IN MANAGEMENT GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT GROWTH OF INDIAN TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY SUBMITTED BY SUBMITTED TO ANIRUDDHA BASU Prof. SANCHITA GHOSH KARAN KUNAL Prof. KRITI SWARUP ARPANJALI CHAKRABORTY Dr. PRANAVA PRAKASH KRITEEKA SHARMA SAURAV ROY 1
  • 2. Table of contents CONTENTS Page No. Introduction 3 Literature Review 4 Research Methodology 16 Hypothesis 22 Data Analysis 23 Results and Findings 26 Recommendations 28 Conclusion 29 Annexure 30 Bibliography 57 2
  • 3. INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW OF TELECOM SECTOR The telecom services have been recognized the world-over as an important tool for socio-economic development for a nation. It is one of the prime support services needed for rapid growth and modernization of various sectors of the economy. Indian telecommunication sector has undergone a major process of transformation through significant policy reforms, particularly beginning with the announcement of NTP 1994 and was subsequently re-emphasized and carried forward under NTP 1999. STATUS OF TELECOM SECTOR The Indian Telecommunications network with 851 million connections (as June 2011) is the second largest in the world. Indian telecommunication industry is the world’s second-largest in terms of number of subscribers, and the world's fastest growing market in terms of number of new subscribers. India had 851.70 million mobile phone subscribers at the end of June 2011.The country has the fourth highest number of Internet users with over 100 million as of December 2010. The primary regulator of communications in India is the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. It closely regulates all of the industries mentioned below with the exception of newspapers and the Internet service provider industry. 3
  • 4. Literature Review The Indian telecommunication network is the third largest in the world and the second largest among the emerging economies of Asia. The Indian telecommunication sector has continued to record noteworthy success throughout the year and has emerged as one of the key sectors that have been accountable for resurgent growth of the Indian economy. The rapid growth of the sector has been coupled with proactive polices and decisions taken by the Indian Government and dynamic involvement of the private sector. The liberal policies in the telecommunication sector have facilitated easy access to telecom companies and a fair regulatory framework offers services to the Indian consumers at affordable prices. MARKET SIZE Over 20.2 million new subscribers were added in the month of February, thereby raising the total mobile phone subscription in the country to 791.38 million. Moreover, the statistics for February state that the rate of growth (2.82 per cent) in the number of rural mobile phone subscribers surpassed than those of the urban areas (2.52 per cent) across the country. The broadband subscription in February, 2011 was 11.47 million as compared to 11.21 million in January, 2011. The Indian telecom sector is largely dominated by private operators that control a share of 87.9 per cent share of the entire sector. Among the top players in the telecom sector, Bharti Airtel owns the largest share at 20.09 per cent, followed by Reliance (16.7 per cent), Vodafone (16.54 per cent), state-owned BSNL (11.41 per cent), Tata (11.08 per cent) and Idea (10.97 per cent). Vodafone has recorded the fastest growth rate in the month of February, at 17.61 per cent in its subscription base. Reliance (16.36 per cent), Bharti (15.85 per cent), Idea (12.43 per cent), Aircel (8.26 per cent) and Tata (7.93 per cent) have also recorded decent growth rate figures for the month of February, 2011, according to Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) database. 4
  • 5. TOP 10 TELECOM COMPANIES IN INDIA • Bharti Airtel • BSNL • Vodafone Essar • Reliance • Idea Cellular • Tata Communications (formerly VSNL) • Tata Teleservices • Aircel • MTNL • Videocon Mobile Services AIRTEL Bharti Airtel Limited formerly known as Bharti Tele-Ventures LTD (BTVL) is an Indian company offering telecommunication services in 19 countries across Asia and Africa. It is the largest cellular service provider in India, with more than 162.2 million subscriptions as of March 2011. It has been ranked among six best performing technology in the world by business week. Bharti Airtel is the world's third largest, single-country mobile operator and fifth largest telecom operator in the world with a subscriber base of over 200 million. It is known for being the first mobile phone company in the world to outsource everything except marketing and sales and finance. Its network (base stations, microwave links, etc.) is maintained by Ericsson and Nokia Siemens Network, business support by IBM . Stakeholders are as follows-: 5
  • 6. Bharti Enterprises (64.76%) Singapore Telecommunications (32%) Vodafone (4.4%) RELIANCE Reliance Communications is India’s integrated telecommunications service provider. The Company has a customer base of 105 million including over 2.5 million individual overseas retail customers. It ranks among the Top 5 Telecom companies in the world by number of customers in a single country. Reliance Communications corporate clientele includes 2,100 Indian and multinational corporations, and over 800 global, regional and domestic carriers. The entire communications covers over 24,000 towns and 600,000 villages. The stake holders are as follows-: Reliance (74%) Public (26%) BHARAT SANCHAR NAGAM LIMITED (A GOVT. OF INDIA ENTERPRISE) BSNL is the third largest cellular service provider, with over 66.88 million customers as of June 2010 and the largest land line telephone provider in India. BSNL further plans to increase its customer base to 160 Million by March, 2014. Its headquarters are at Bharat Sanchar Bhawan, Harish Chandra Mathur Lane, Janpath, New Delhi. It has the status of Miniratna, a status assigned to reputed Central Public Sector Enterprise in India. VODAFONE Vodafone Essar, formerly known as Hutchison Essar is a cellular operator in India that covers 23 telecom circles in India. Vodafone Essar is owned by Vodafone 67% and Essar Group 33%. It is the second largest mobile phone operator in terms of revenue behind Bharti Airtel, and third largest in terms of customers. 6
  • 7. Despite the official name being Vodafone Essar, its products are simply branded Vodafone. It offers both prepaid and postpaid GSM cellular phone coverage throughout India with good presence in the metros. Vodafone Essar provides 2.75G services based on 900 MHz and 1800 MHz digital GSM technology, offering voice and data services in 23 of the country's 23 license areas. It is among the top three GSM mobile operators of India. TATA DOCOMO It is a Tata Teleservices Limited's (TTSL) cellular service provider on the GSM platform-arising out of the Tata Group's strategic joint venture with Japanese telecom giant NTT Docomo in November 2008. Tata Teleservices has received a pan-India license to operate GSM telecom services, under the brand "TATA DOCOMO" and has also been allotted spectrum in 18 telecom Circles. TTSL has already rolled out its services in various circles. It has become very popular with its one second pulse especially in semi-urban and rural areas. IDEA Idea Cellular is a wireless telephony company operating in all the 22 telecom circles in India based in Mumbai. In 2000, Tata Cellular was a company providing mobile services in AP. When Birla-AT&T brought Maharashtra and Gujarat to the table, the merger of these two entities was a reality. Thus Birla-Tata- AT&T, popularly known as Batata, was born and was later branded as idea. Then Idea set sights on RPG’s operations in Madhya Pradesh which was successfully acquired, helping Batata have a million subscribers, and the license to be the fourth operator in Delhi was clinched. AIRCEL Aircel is a joint venture between Maxis Communications of Malaysia and Apollo Hospital Enterprise Ltd of India. Maxis have a 74% stake in Aircel and the remaining 26% is with Apollo Hospitals. It is India’s fifth largest GSM mobile service provider with a subscriber base of over 27.7 million, as of October 31, 2009. It has a market share of 12.8% among the GSM operators in the country UNINOR 7
  • 8. It has received spectrum to roll out these services in 21 of the 22 telecom circles. Uninor will be owned 67.25% by Norwegian telecom giant Telenor, and 32.75% by UNITECH. Uninor has started mobile services in India at the end of 2009, focusing on the GSM technology. Uninor is India's eighth nation-wide mobile operator, in a competitive landscape of 13 nation-wide or regional mobile operators STRATEGIES ROLLED OUT BY AIRTEL The major strategies of Bharti Airtel in the past 5 years are as under: 1. Outsourcing all major operations except Marketing, Sales and Finance: It is known for being the first mobile phone company in the world to outsource everything except marketing and sales and finance. Its network (base stations, microwave links, etc.) is maintained by Ericsson and Nokia Siemens Network, business support by IBM. Oracle provides Bharti Airtel with real-time financial and human resources information as well as information for the organization to churn out higher operational efficiency, along with better visibility and enhanced management over its financial and HR operations. 2. Bharti Airtel has a joint Venture with Alcatel-Lucent to manage the network infrastructure for the Telemedia Business. 3. Bharti Airtel and Google announced a strategic partnership, as part of the agreement, Airtel will bring Google search to the Airtel Live mobile WAP portal. Google will also incorporate advertising through its Mobile Ads product on the Airtel Live mobile portal. This was a good move however, since the advent of faster internet connectivity this facility has taken a beating as mobile users can now access the whole page on the web rather than a slimmed down version of the same webpage. 4. M-Commerce 8
  • 9. Mobile phone now turns into a virtual wallet – a new innovation in mobile commerce. Airtel, ICICI Bank & VISA had joined hands to launch mChq – a revolutionary new service – a credit card on the mobile phone. This is the first mobile-to-mobile payment option, which enables Airtel customers and ICICI Bank Visa cardholders to pay for their purchases with their Airtel mobile phones. . 5. Targeting 55 million farmers under its fold, Indian Farmers Fertilizer Cooperative (IFFCO) have agreed upon a joint venture with telecom major Bharti Airtel to provide a boost to Indian agriculture and rural economy at large. 6. Hiring the best or attracting the best (poaching or otherwise) Airtel has a history of hiring some of the high level officials from other companies to be an integral part of their business. This is not just the strategy used by Airtel but also other telecom majors. Some of the recently hired officials are Shireesh Joshi (previously in PepsiCo) as Director Marketing head. Bharti Airtel has also recently roped in Joachim Horn, chief technology officer (CTO), T-Mobile, to help expand its global footprint and interface with strategic partners. 7. Expansion into Africa Airtel made rapid strides to expand its presence in Africa first through showing intent of acquiring MTN, which was called by The Economist as ‘marrying up’ but as the deal went awry they moved forward by acquiring Zain Telecoms business in 15 countries in Africa. This is an important move as Africa has a higher consumer spending, $ 1.4 trillion, average revenue per user of $8 which is much higher than India and only 3 to 5 players in each market making it one key market where Airtel can expand. With the infrastructure of Zain in place the market share of Airtel is already high in the continent. 8. Digital TV, the DTH service from Airtel 9
  • 10. The implementation of the initially failed concept of Set Top Box led Airtel to enter this lucrative market to television. Cable connection in India was run by local cable operators who acted largely in form of cartels. With the crackdown from the regulatory bodies in India this sector once again became a gold mine. 9. Joint venture deal with Wal-Mart, the US retail giant, to start a number of retail stores across India. This is crucial for Airtel as this would mark its entry into the new theatre of retailing. The most important facet of retailing is logistics which is a major challenge in India for Airtel. STRATEGIES OF VODAFONE INDIA 1. Core Competencies: Vodafone’s primary aim is to be a world leader in mobile communication and at the same time provide a unique experience to the customers who use their services. By analysing the overall structure of the company, it can be understood that reliable innovative services and the customer centric passion are the core products of the company. The brand image of Vodafone is very strong in the market and a continuous recycling of their campaigns from the pug to Zoo zoo’s to the present blackberry boys advertisements has guaranteed their brand a high recall value. 2. Market Prospects / Penetration: Vodafone’s intention to tap the price sensitive rural market comes with its low cost offerings such as low priced Magic Box which has a bundled low priced handset along with prepaid card and various freebies. Products like Vodafone 150 priced at Rs. 799 and eco-friendly solar charging handset VF 247 will help Vodafone to penetrate the rural market in a big way. 3. Competitive Advantage: From product innovation to technological advantage, Vodafone as a brand keeps on improving and coming up with new plans. Vodafone adjusts according to the changing market which gives them a competitive advantage. Vodafone has from 10
  • 11. time to time come with creative advertising campaign for its various plans which has captured the imagination of millions. Vodafone’s plans like “Chota Recharge” and number of add on plans like these has made it sure that it maintains an edge over its competitors. Vodafone pursues a global international corporate-level strategy and has heavily focused on acquisitions like Hutch acquisition in India. SWOT OF TELECOM INDUSTRY IN INDIA Strengths • Huge Customer potential • Tele density still being 48% and rural tele density 21%. • The broadband subscribers grew from 0.18 million in 2005 to 6.2 million as on 30 April 2009 and about 7.98 million, at the end of the December 2009 and till June 2011 it was about 11.41 million. • High Growth Rate • Wireless subscribers growing at a CAGR of 60 per cent per annum since 2006. • Allowed FDI limit ranging from 74% to 100% • The total FDI equity inflows in telecom sector have been US$ 2223 million during April-November 2009-10 • The foreign direct investment in the telecom sector was Rs 5,434.48 crore during the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Weakness • Poor Telecommunication Infrastructure ▫ Result: Large number of call drops. • Late adopters of New Technology- India was amongst the last countries in the world to get access to 3G technology.3.5G is and even 4G are there in many countries and in India 3G is not properly available among all circles. 11
  • 12. • Most competitive market Opportunities • 3G Telecom services and 4G services • More Quality Service • Value added Services (VAS) • Boost to Telecom Manufacturing Companies • Telecom Equipment Exports ▫ The Indian telecom industry is expected to reach a size of Rs 344,921 crore by 2012 at a growth rate of over 26 per cent, and generate employment opportunities for about 10 million people during the same period. The sector would create direct employment for 2.8 million people and for 7 million indirectly, according to a Frost and Sullivan report. • Horizontal Integration Threats • Declining ARPU (average Revenue per user) ▫ E.g. price wars like per-second billing which is deflating revenues and making sure the ‘survival of the fittest’ • Partiality on the part of the Govt. ▫ e.g. Allowing 3G service in a PSU (MTNL,BSNL) before auctioning to Private Sector. • Content Piracy Large Market Potential Around 30-40 million people in India join the middle class every year. The country’s upper middle class spends 6 percent of its earnings on telecom services. India is one of the largest consumer markets in the world. Due to rapid economic 12
  • 13. growth and rise in disposable income, the spending power of consumers is increasing rapidly. It has been forecasted that 15 years down the line, Indians will be approximately four times richer than they are today. As per this forecast, Indians will purchase five times more cars and consume three times more crude oil than they do today. Low Labour Cost CII estimates that manufactured product outsourcing accounted for US$ 10 billion in 2007. The value will escalate to US$ 50 billion by 2015. India has one of the lowest labour costs among the developing countries, which is the foremost factor for attracting multinational giants in every sector. Growth of the Sector The phenomenal growth in the Indian mobile industry was brought about by the wireless revolution that began in the nineties. Besides this, the following factors also aided the growth of the industry. Liberalization The relaxation of telecom regulations has played a major role in the development of the Indian telecom industry. The liberalization policies of 1991 and the consequent influx of private players have led the industry on a high growth trajectory and have increased the level of competition. Post-liberalization, the telecom industry has received more investments and has implemented higher technology. Changing Demographic Profile The changing demographic profile of India has also played an important role in subscriber growth. The changed profile is characterized by a large young population, a burgeoning middle class with growing disposable income, urbanization, increasing literacy levels and higher adaptability to technology. These new features have multiplied the need to be connected always and to own a wireless phone and therefore, in present times mobiles are perceived as a utility rather than a luxury. 13
  • 14. Increased Competition & Declining Tariffs Liberalization of the telecom industry has fuelled intense competition, especially in the cellular segment. The ever-increasing competition has led to high growth of subscribers and has put pressure on tariffs, which have seen a sharp drop over the years. When the cellular phones were introduced, call rates were at a peak of Rs 16 per minute and there were charges for incoming calls too. Today, however, incoming calls are no longer charged and outgoing calls are charged at less than a rupee per minute. Growth Avenues A managed service is another segment that is attracting telecom companies. On account of the rapidly growing subscriber base, service providers find it difficult to manage their infrastructure and network management operations. In such cases, they completely or partially outsource their infrastructure or network management operations. To reduce their network deployment costs, many service providers are considering infrastructure sharing offers the following advantages:  Improved service quality  Increased affordability for customers  Faster roll out of services in rural and remote areas  Increased environmental aesthetics  Lower operating costs for service providers Value Added Services: The VAS industry was worth USD 632 million in 2006–07. The industry is estimated to grow by 65 percent in 2011–12 and become an USD 1,011 million opportunity. 14
  • 15. Problems Multiple issues plague the mobile industry growth in the country Declining Quality and Congestion One of the major consumer issues is increased network congestion and the consequent Quality of Service (QoS). This problem is particularly exacerbated in densely populated parts of cities and during peak times. The principal reason for this problem is that the service providers have not scaled up their telecom network infrastructure in proportion to the increased network usage. The latter is a direct consequence of the increased number of subscribers and increased number of calls made by these subscribers. Increase in Number of Telecom Towers The larger number of subscribers and service providers has led to the mushrooming of telecom towers, especially in metros and big cities. These towers contain mobile base station equipment, which produces 900 and 1800 MHz pulsated waves. This has increased the electromagnetic contamination- referred to commonly as "Electro smog" in urban centers. A number of scientific studies have been done which warn us about danger posed by this electromagnetic contamination to the health of humans and other living being 15
  • 16. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Introduction to Research Methodology Research is common parlance refers to a search for knowledge. One can also define research as a scientific and systematic search for pertinent information on a specific topic. In fact, research is an art of investigation. According to Clifford Woody research comprises defining and redefining problems, formulating hypothesis or suggested solutions, collecting, organizing and evaluating data, making deductions and reaching conclusions; and at last carefully testing the conclusions to determine whether they fit the formulating hypothesis. Like every subject this topic of the handloom sector has also been thoroughly researched and the relevant information has been rightly used. Qualitative and Quantitative Research Data Gathering: Quantitative Data Information that can be counted or expressed numerically is called quantitative data. This type of data is often collected in experiments, manipulated and statistically analyzed. Quantitative data can be represented visually in graphs and charts. Qualitative Data Qualitative data is extremely varied in nature. It includes virtually any information that can be captured that is not numerical in nature. 'Soft' data that approximates but does not measure the attributes, characteristics, properties, of a thing or phenomenon is called qualitative data. There are two methods of collecting data. They are: Primary Data It is a term for data collected on source which has not been subjected to processing or any other manipulation. It is the Data that has been compiled for a specific 16
  • 17. purpose, and has not been collated or merged with others. Primary data is always collected from firsthand experience. Secondary Data Secondary data is data collected by someone other than the user. Common sources of secondary data for social science include censuses, surveys, organizational records and data collected through qualitative methodologies or qualitative research. Secondary data analysis saves time that would otherwise be spent collecting data and, particularly in the case of quantitative data, provides larger and higher-quality databases than would be unfeasible for any individual researcher to collect on their own. Pilot Study An initial Pilot study has been conducted to determine what factors influence customers to choose a certain network over other competitors. The study found fifteen factors which are detrimental to consumers. The factors are:  Local Call Rates  STD Call Rates  Family Members Using The Network  Free Call Services  Convenience In Paying Bills  Network Connectivity  Frequent Promotional Offers  Roaming Connectivity  Internet Access  Availability Of Recharge Coupons  Family Friend Group Services  Messaging Packs  Payment/ Recharge Kiosk  Customer Care Service  Popularity Of the Company 17
  • 18. Questionnaire A questionnaire was prepared based on the above fifteen factors and a sample size of a hundred people were taken, consisting of people from different age groups, profession, geographic location and income. The results obtained from the questionnaire were used for performing co-relation and other statistical tasks. Correlation The word correlation is used to denote the degree of association between variables. If two variables x and y are so related that variations in the magnitude of one variable tend to be accompanied by variations in the magnitude of other variables, they are said to be correlated. If y tends to increase as x increases, the variables are said to be positively related. If y tends to decrease as x increases the variables are negatively correlated. If the values of y are not affected by changes in the value of x, the variables are said to be uncorrelated. The co-relation used is to depict that call rates are inversely proportional to number of customers using the network. With the growth in the customer base over the years the call rates have declined. Properties of correlation coefficient The correlation coefficient ‘r’ is independent of the choice of both origin and scale of observations the correlation coefficient ‘r’ is a pure number and is independent of the units of measurement. The correlation coefficient ‘r’ lies between –1& +1. Formulae, We use this correlation method to correlate the mobile call rates for several years with the total mobile subscribers of those years. We calculate the Pearson’s correlation with the software SPSS to find out whether the value is significant or not. 18
  • 19. Rank correlation The product-moment correlation coefficient ( r ) is calculated by using ‘values’ of the variables. But many situations arise in which either either precise measurements are not available, or the characters cannot be measured ta all. For example, in order to find the extent os association between ‘intelligence’ and ‘efficiency in salesmanship’ for a group of salesman. But this method is open to many objections, and an exact measurement of the two qualities is not at all possible. R lies between +1 & -1 Formulae, We have used spearman’s rank correlation to correlate the total mobile subscribers for different operators of a particular year, i.e. 2009-2010 with the total port in’s of subscribers to their operators. We use spearman’s rank correlation as the data was available for only one year. We calculate the spearman’s rank correlation with the help of a software SPSS to find its significance. Factor Analysis Factor Analysis is a statistical method used to describe variability among observed, correlated variables in terms of a potentially lower number of unobserved variables called factors. In other words, it is possible, for example, that variations in three or four observed variables mainly reflect the variations in fewer such unobserved variables. Factor analysis searches for such joint variations in response to unobserved latent variables. The observed variables are modeled as linear combinations of the potential factors, plus "error" terms. The information gained about the interdependencies between observed variables can be used later to reduce the set of variables in a dataset. 19
  • 20. Principal Component Analysis Principal component analysis is a mathematical procedure that uses an orthogonal transformation to convert a set of observations of possibly correlated variables into a set of values of linearly uncorrelated variables called principal components. The number of principal components is less than or equal to the number of original variables. This transformation is defined in such a way that the first principal component has the largest possible variance (that is, accounts for as much of the variability in the data as possible), and each succeeding component in turn has the highest variance possible under the constraint that it be orthogonal to (i.e., uncorrelated with) the preceding components. Principal components are guaranteed to be independent only if the data set is jointly normally distributed. PCA is sensitive to the relative scaling of the original variables. Certain terminologies used in the factor analysis are: - Varimax: An orthogonal rotation method that minimizes the number of variables that have high loadings on each factor. Communality Matrix: Communality matrix indicates the amount of variance in each variable that is accounted for. The initial communalities is the estimate of the variance in each variable accounted for by all components/factors. Extraction communality is the estimate of the variance in each variable accounted for in the factor solution. The smaller value indicates that they do not fit well with the factor solution. Total variance matrix: The total variance matrix provides us with the values which are based on initial eigen values. The total column gives the amount of variance in the observed variable accounted for by each component/factor. Rotated Component Matrix: From the rotated component matrix we take the components which is better represented and have higher position on the screen plot i.e, these factors are highly loaded and contribute to the resultant output. Factor Transformation Matrix: The factor transformation matrix describes the specific rotation applied to your factor solution. Component Plot in Rotated Space; Component plot in rotated space provides a graphical representation of the variable in the component space. 20
  • 21. Bartlett's test A method to test for the equalities of variances from a number of independent normal samples by testing the hypothesis. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) Test The KMO test is used to determine whether the sample size is adequate or not. If the results show less than.5 as an answer the sample size is considered inadequate. Forecasting Forecasting is the use of historical data to determine the future trends. It is used by companies to determine how to allocate their budgets for an upcoming period of time. This is typically based on demand for the goods and services it offers, compared to the cost of producing them. Investors utilize forecasting to determine if events affecting a company, such as sales expectations, will increase or decrease the price of shares in that company. Forecasting also provides an important benchmark for firms which have a long-term perspective of operations. Linear forecasting Linear forecasting is a mathematical operation where future values of discrete time series are estimated as a linear function of previous samples. I have used this method to forecast the total mobile and landline subscribers up to the year 2014-2015. I have used Microsoft Excel to forecast the landline and mobile subscribers for different years. 21
  • 22. HYPOTHESIS H10: Mobile call rates do not significantly affect total mobile subscriber base. H11: Mobile call rates significantly affect total mobile subscriber base. 22
  • 23. DATA ANALYSIS Table - 1 along with the Bar Graph, depict the growth of Subscriber Base in India at the end of each financial year during the past decade (2000 to 2010). It can be seen that during the last year (2010) although BSNL and MTNL have registered decline, private operators have jointly had a growth of 11.51% increasing the connections from 5.04 million to 5.62 million. Table - 1.1 shows the Annual Growth Rate registered by Basic and Cellular Phone services for a period of three years ranging from 1998-99 to 2000-01. The Histogram below clearly indicates a rapidly increasing trend in the growth rate of Cellular Phone services. Table - 1.2 demonstrates Growth of Cellular Phone Subscribers in different Metros and Circles of India during the years 1997 to 2003. The bar graph along with the table show that the number of such subscribers has consistently increased over the years. Table - 1.3 and its subsequent graphical representation indicate Company-wise, the number of Mobile Telephone Connections/Subscribers in Rural and Urban Areas of India as on 31st December, 2010. When compared individually, it can be seen that 'Reliance Telecom + Communications Ltd’ has the maximum number (9,85,69,506) of subscribers in urban areas while ‘Bharati Airtel’ has the maximum number (6,08,47,715) of subscribers in rural areas. However when compared in totality, (i.e., no. of subscribers in urban areas + rural areas),’ Bharati Airtel’ clearly dominates the other companies with a subscriber base of 15,24,95,219. Table - 1.4 shows the Percentage Rate of Growth in Postpaid and Prepaid Mobile Subscribers in India from the financial year 2000 to 2004. It is visible from the Pie Charts that both Postpaid Subscribers as well as Prepaid subscribers indicate an increasing trend. Table - 1.5 points out Company-wise, the Market Share and Technology used by the Subscriber Base of Mobile Operators in India as on March, 2005. The Bar Graph represents the total number of different cellular group subscribers, Bharati 23
  • 24. Group having the maximum number (1,09,84,280) of subscribers. The Pie Chart represents the approximate market share of the different cellular groups, Bharati Group consequently having maximum market share and HFCl and Shyam Telelink having almost no market share. Table – 1.6 along with its Line Chart indicate Operator-wise, the number of Subscribers who ported their numbers under Mobile Number Portability Scheme (MNPS) in India as on 25th February, 2011. It is seen that Bharati Airtel has the maximum number of total ports (5,30,615) in as well as total ports (3,82,400) out followed by Vodafone (ports in-4,88,250 & ports out-2,95,489). Table – 1.7 represents Circle-wise, the Population and Area Covered under Mobile Telephone Services in India as on 30th June, 2010. The Pie Charts indicate that out of the total population covered under mobile telephone services, Uttar Pradesh East has a maximum population of 8,08,22,915. On the other hand, out of the total area covered under mobile telephone services, Andhra Pradesh covers a maximum area of 2,20,326 sq km. Andaman and Nicobar Islands have a minimum population of 3,16,000 and covers a minimum area of 797 sq km. Table – 1.8 indicates the total number of Fixed (landline + Wll) and Mobile Phones in India during the years 1999 to 2006. The Line chart shows that although there has been a considerable rise in the number of fixed/basic phones over the years, the number of mobile phones have immensely risen from only 1.2 million in 1999 to 92.52 million in 2006. Table – 1.9 its Graph and Pie Charts illustrate the Subscriber Base of Mobile (GSM and CDMA) Services in India from March 2000 to March 2009. On examining, it is seen that apart from BPL and Sistema which have fluctuating growth rates , all the other Service Providers have shown an increasing trend it their growths. Table – 1.10 demonstrates Category-wise, the Subscriber Base for Mobile (GSM) Services in India from 1999 to 2007. The Bar Graph rightly shows that the subscriber base of Metros, A circles, B circles and C circles have all grown considerably over the years. Table – 1.11 points out the Top Five Mobile Operators on the basis of Market Share along with Subscriber Base in India as on March, 2003 and March, 2004. The Graph represents the top five mobile operators on the basis of subscriber base 24
  • 25. in India, Bharati being in the first position in 2003 and Reliance being in the first position in 2004 and Idea being in the fifth position in both the years. The Pie Charts indicate the top five mobile operators on the basis of their market share in the years 2003 and 2004, Bharati having maximum percentage of market share in 2003 and Reliance having maximum in 2004. Table – 1.12 and its subsequent graphical representation illustrate the Trends in Revenue Earned per minute (Incoming + Outgoing) for GSM Cellular Services in India from the year 2000 to 2004. It shows the revenue earned per minute and its respective percentage change under Postpaid services, Prepaid services and Blended (postpaid + prepaid) Services. Table – 1.13 demonstrates the trend in Growth of Tele-density from March 2005 to March 2010. It is clearly visible from the Line Chart that the tele-density at the end of March,2010 reached the mark of 52.74 as compared to 36.98 at the end of the previous year recording an increase of nearly 15.76 . Table-1.14 shows the forecasting of the total landline subscribers and total mobile subscribers up to 2014-2015. It is represented by a line graph showing the growth in the landline subscribers and mobile subscribers. The rate of growth of mobile subscribers is more in comparison to the rate of growth of the landline subscribers due to continuous decrease in the tariff rates of mobile. Table-1.15 shows the operator wise growth from 1999-2000 to 2009-2010. It is represented through a bar graph showing growth of different operators in different years. It is seen from this graph that all the operator’s subscriber base has grown but the highest growth is in Airtel followed by Relaince. Table-1.16 shows the service revenue earned by the different telecom operators from 2008-2009 to 2011-2012. It is represented by a bar graph showing growth of different operators in different years. I have also forecasted the revenue earned by the operators for the year 2011-2012 on the basis of previous years revenue earned. It is seen from this graph that the maximum revenue is earned by Airtel followed by Reliance. Table-1.17 shows the correlation between mobile call rates and total cellular subscribers. The correlation is -.889 at 0.01 level of significance which means both 25
  • 26. are highly and negatively correlated and the data is statistically significant. It means with decrease in cellular call rates the total cellular subscribers will rise. Table-1.18 shows the trend in revenue earned per minute for both incoming and outgoing for all the GSM operators. It is represented by a line graph showing the fall in the revenue earned per minute for both postpaid and prepaid numbers for the year 1999-2000 to 2003-2004. It is seen from the graph that the prepaid revenue earned per minute has reduced more in comparison to postpaid revenue with the increase in number of operators and subscriber base in the industry. Table-1.19 shows the Spearman’s rank correlation between total subscribers of different operators and the total port in’s for the different operators. The Spearman’s rank correlation is .709 at 0.05 level of significance which means both are highly and positively correlated and data is statistically significant. RESULTS AND FINDINGS  The most important and obvious finding is that the Telecom Industry has significantly grown over the past decade (2000-2010) with a high boom during the period 2005-2010.  The Subscriber Base in the urban areas, especially in the Metros, has highly risen in the last five years as compared to the Rural areas.  The rate of growth in the number of Cellular Phone subscribers has been more rapid as compared to that of the Basic Phone subscribers.  During the last year (2010) although BSNL and MTNL have registered decline, private operators have jointly had a growth of 11.51% increasing the connections from 5.04 million to 5.62 million. 26
  • 27.  Both prepaid and postpaid subscribers have shown an increasing trend in their growth rate.  The Tele-density at the end of March, 2010 reached the mark of 52.74 as compared to 36.98 at the end of the previous year recording an increase of nearly 15.76.  The top five mobile operators in India, on the basis of subscriber base and market share, are Airtel, Reliance, BSNL, Vodafone and Idea.  Bharati Airtel has the maximum number of subscribers in the Rural areas and Urban areas.  In totality, Bharati Airtel has the maximum percentage of share in the market.  There has been a significant rise in the total mobile subscribers. It has increased from 3107449 in 1999-00 to 494036000 in 2009-10, which further will increase to 950802215 in 2014-2015.  There has been a significant rise in the total mobile subscribers. It has increased from 3107449 in 1999-00 to 494036000 in 2009-10, which further will increase to 950802215 in 2014-2015  There has been an increase in total landline subscribers but this is not risen significantly and has increased at an decreasing rate.  There has been a significant decrease in average cellular call rates from Rs.5 in 1999-00 to Rs. 0.5 in 2009-10.  There has been a significant impact of total port in’s of different operators to total mobile subscribers in the year 2009-2010 for different operators, this affects the market share of different operators. 27
  • 28.  Lastly, it is seen that with the growth in the number of users in the Telecom industry, the call rates have been subsequently declining On examining and reviewing all the data and findings, the following RECCOMENDATIONS could be made:  Small players and non performing like S TEL, Sistema, Loop Mobile, Etisalat (Cheers Mobile) should merge with major players like Airtel and Vodafone as norms related to merger and acquisition will be relaxed after 2011 telecom policy is implemented.  As India have large middle class people companies should tie up with Apple and Blackberry to offer Handset with an effective EMI scheme with postpaid plan as it happens in country like U.K.  Airtel should outsource its marketing operations too.  Vodafone launched I Phone 4 quite later after being launched by Airtel and Aircel. In future Vodafone should be in line or a step ahead of its competitors.  As the government targets to increase rural teledensity, this segment will boost the demand for telecom services, equipment, Internet services and other value-added services; thereby, offering great market opportunities for telecom players.  Companies should focus on awareness and promotion campaigns in rural areas.  Airtel can launch its own handsets as Vodafone is doing at cheaper rates. 28
  • 29. CONCLUSION The mobile service provider industry in India has experienced exponential growth over the past few years and has been an important contributor to economic growth; however, the cut-throat competition and intense tariff wars have had a negative impact on the revenue of players. Despite the challenges, the Indian mobile service provider industry will thrive because of the immense potential in terms of new users. India is one of the most-attractive cellular markets because it is still one of the lowest penetrated markets. Operators are on an expansion mode and are investing heavily on telecom infrastructure. Foreign telecom companies are acquiring considerable stakes in Indian companies. Burgeoning middle class and increasing purchasing power, the government’s thrust on increasing rural telecom coverage, favorable investment climate and positive reforms will ensure that India’s high potential is indeed realized. While preparing the above Term Paper the following shortcomings were observed. The absence of such shortcomings would definitely assure the betterment of the project in future.  Moreover, since only the Telecom Industry in the Indian market was analyzed and the Global markets were not taken into account, therefore the true position of this industry in the Global Market Sector could not be determined. Examination of the industry on a global basis would tell us where exactly the industry stands.  Further, the time span for preparing the project, being too short, the intricacies of the individual companies, their reason for growth or decline and other pros and cons etc., could not be looked into at depth. 29
  • 30.  The Questionnaire survey could only be performed in the confines of only one city due to time constraints. Hence the results do depict a vague similarity due to the people belonging to same culture, income group and other similar factors. FUTURE OF THE INDUSTRY According to the analytical study of the telecom sector, the use of mobile phones is growing day by day in the Indian telecom sector with a projected growth of CAGR of around 6.6% increase in the subscriber base of 2011-2012 to 2014-2015. The other segments of this industry will also record growth, like the internet are also anticipated growth both in terms of subscriber addition and development of infrastructure during the forecast period. Moreover, with the launch of 3G services, the country is expected to witness rapid surge in the broadband subscribers’ base during the coming years. According to a Gartner report, after China, India would be fastest growing mobile telephony market in Asia Pacific with revenues slated to increase at a CAGR of 18.4% to reach $25 billion in 2011 from current $9 billion. Cellular penetration would increase to 38.6% in 2011 with 58% of rural population and 95% of urban population possessing mobile phone. The market will be driven by prepaid connections, which will account for more than 93% connections. The voluntary churn rate is expected to reach 41% from current 30.6%. The revenues from data services will contribute to the revenue growth; however the bulk of the revenues will continue to come from voice services. Customers with low disposable incomes will increase as such the Average Revenue Per User will decline. Large players will have an advantage as they expand their presence and take advantage of economies of scale. But they will face tremendous challenges owing to intensifying competition. 30
  • 31. Annexure TABLE - 1 GROWTH OF SUBSCRIBER BASE FROM 2000-2010 FINANCIAL SUBSCRIBER BASE (IN YEAR MILLION) 2000 28.53 2001 36.29 2002 44.97 2003 54.62 2004 75.54 2005 98.41 2006 140.32 2007 206.83 2008 300.49 2009 429.72 2010 621.28 Source: www.indiastat.com 31
  • 32. 700 621.28 600 500 429.72 400 300.49 300 206.83 200 140.32 75.54 98.41 100 28.53 36.29 44.97 54.62 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 SUBSCRIBER BASE (IN MILLION) Source: Based on the above table (author’s work TABLE - 1.1 Annual Growth Rate Registered by Basic and Cellular Phone Services (1998-99 to 2000-01) Growth Rate Year Basic Cellular Phone Phone 1998-99 21.40% 35.96% 1999-00 23.32% 57.08% 2000-01 22.73% 89.84% Source: www.vision2020planningcommission.nic.in 32
  • 33. 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% Growth Rate Basic Phone 40.00% Growth Rate Cellular Phone 20.00% 0.00% 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Source: Based on the above table (author’s work) TABLE - 1.2 Growth of Cellular Phone Subscribers in India (1997 to 2003) Subscribers As on Metros Circles Total 1997 325967 12698 338665 1998 551757 330559 882316 1999 519543 680035 1199578 2000 795931 1088380 1884311 2001 1362592 2214503 3577095 2002 2567757 3863763 6431520 2003 4439524 8248113 12687637 Source: www.indiastat.com 33
  • 34. 30000000 25000000 20000000 Total 15000000 Circles 10000000 Metros 5000000 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Source: Based on the above table (author’s work) 34
  • 35. TABLE - 1.3 Company-wise Number of Mobile Telephone Connections/Subscribers in Rural and Urban Areas of India (As on 31.12.2010) Sl. Mobile Telephones Companies No. Rural Urban Total 1 Aircel 17731187 32437624 50168811 2 Bharati Airtel 60847715 91647504 152495219 3 Etisalat DB Telecom 0 264899 264899 4 HFCL Infotel Ltd 8593 1606500 1615093 5 IDEA Mobile 40672096 41106559 81778655 6 Loop Mobile 0 3044579 3044579 Reliance Telecom + 27082621 98569506 125652127 7 Communications Ltd 8 Sistema Shyam 1935360 6498307 8433667 9 STEL 611031 1704493 2315524 10 TATA Teleservices Ltd. 17898628 66334770 84233398 11 Uninor 5560484 12949565 18510049 12 Videocon 0 7319603 7319603 13 Vodafone Essar 47761849 76493271 124255120 14 Private Total 220109564 439977180 660086744 15 BSNL 30790563 55918974 86709537 16 MTNL 0 5403754 5403754 17 PSU Total 30790563 61322728 92113291 18 India 250900127 501299908 752200035 Source: TRAI Annual Report 2009-10 80000000 70000000 60000000 50000000 40000000 30000000 20000000 10000000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Mobile Telephones Rural Mobile Telephones Urban Mobile Telephones Total Source: Based on the above table (author’s work) 35
  • 36. TABLE - 1.4 Rate of Growth in Postpaid and Prepaid Mobile Subscribers in India (2000 to 2004) Growth rate of Growth rate of prepaid Financial Year postpaid subscribers subscribers 2000 NA NA 2001 40% 96% 2002 57% 157% 2003 14% 98% 2004 124% 168% Source: www.trai.gov.in Growth rate of postpaid subscribers 2001 40% 2004 2002 124% 57% 2003 14% Growth rate of prepaid subscribers 2001 2004 96% 168% 2002 2003 157% 98% Source: Based on the above table (author’s work) 36
  • 37. TABLE - 1.5 Company-wise Market Share and Technology Used by Subscriber Base of Mobile Operators in India (March, 2005) Sl. No. Cellular Group Subscribers on March, 05 Market Share Technology Used 1 Bharti Grp 10,984,280 21 GSM 2 Reliance Grp 10,446,053 20 GSM & CDMA 3 BSNL 9,899,425 19 GSM & CDMA 4 Hutchison Grp 7,797,720 14.9 GSM 5 IDEA Grp 5,069,693 9.7 GSM 6 BPL Grp 2,575,387 4.9 GSM 7 Spice Grp 1,438,824 2.8 GSM 8 Aircel Grp 1,755,350 3.4 GSM 9 Tata Teleservices 1,089,500 2.1 CDMA 10 MTNL 1,078,143 2.1 GSM & CDMA 11 HFCL 53,163 0.1 CDMA 12 Shyam Telelink 27,663 0.1 CDMA 13 Total Subscribers 52,215,201 100 GSM & CDMA Different Cellular Group Subscribers on March, 05 60,000,000 50,000,000 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 Subscribers on March, 05 10,000,000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Market Share of Different Cellular Groups Tata MTNL Teleservices 2% 2% Shyam Spice Grp HFCL Telelink 3% Aircel Grp 0% 0% BPL Grp 3% 5% Bharti Grp IDEA Grp 10% 21% Hutchison Grp Reliance Grp 15% 20% BSNL 19% Source Of table: www.vision2020planningcommission.nic.in Source of Graph: Based on the above table (author’s work) 37
  • 38. 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Operators Total Port In Total Port Out Source of Table: www.trai.gov.in Source of Graph: Based on the above table (author’s work) 38
  • 39. TABLE - 1.7 Circle-wise Population and Area Covered under Mobile Telephone Services in India (As on 30.06.2010) Circle Population Covered Area Covered (Sq. Km.) Andaman & Nicobar 316000 797 Andhra Pradesh 67334977 220326 Assam 20860000 39338 Bihar 53006472 59650 Chhattisgarh 13378309 60411 Gujarat 41997127 110680 Haryana 16544108 32489 Himachal Pradesh 3624010 30113 Jammu and Kashmir 6388782 31793 Jharkhand 11603207 35285 Karnataka 37167579 101760 Kerala 30162136 35536 Madhya Pradesh 27736320 118774 Maharashtra 68843231 106563 North East-1 3333021 21772 North East-2 2519283 20046 Orissa 25278005 102912 Punjab 23304386 45933 Rajasthan 43729884 164315 Tamil Nadu 50516502 93794 Uttarakhand 5154923 35039 Uttar Pradesh East 80822915 140798 Uttar Pradesh West 25831170 44051 West Bengal 28737425 27175 Kolkatta TD 13214676 2200 Chennai TD 9975869 4913 Total 711380317 1686463 Population Covered Area Covered (Sq. Andaman & Nicobar Andhra Pradesh Assam Bihar Km.) Chhattisgarh Gujarat Haryana Himachal Pradesh Jammu and Kashmir Jharkhand Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra North East-1 North East-2 Orissa Punjab Rajasthan Tamil Nadu Uttarakhand Uttar Pradesh East Uttar Pradesh West West Bengal Kolkatta TD Chennai TD Total Source of Table: TRAI Annual Report 2009-10 Source of Graph: Based on the above table (author’s work) 39
  • 40. Source: www.vision2020planningcommission.nic.in 100 90 80 70 No. of Telephone (in 60 Million) Fixed 50 (Landline+WLL) 40 No. of Telephone (in 30 Million) Mobile 20 10 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Source: Based on the above table (author’s work) 40
  • 41. TABLE - 1.9 Subscriber Base of Mobile (GSM and CDMA) Services in India (March, 2000 to 2009) (in Million) % % Growth Growth Over Service Mar, Mar, Mar, Mar, Mar, Mar, Mar, Mar, Over Mar, 08 Mar, 09 March, Providers 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Financial 2005 Year (One 2008 Year) Bharti 0.36 0.69 1.35 3.07 6.5 10.98 19.58 37.14 61.98 93.92 78.32% 51.53% BSNL 0.04 2.29 5.53 9.9 17.65 30.99 40.79 52.15 78.28% 58.70% Reliance 0.07 0.19 0.38 0.54 7.26 10.45 17.31 28.01 45.79 72.67 65.65% 55.84% Hutch 0.45 0.71 1.27 2.16 5.15 7.8 15.36 26.44 44.13 68.77 96.92% 27.85% Tata 0.05 0.16 0.63 1.09 4.85 16.02 24.33 35.12 344.95% 44.35% Idea 0.16 0.34 0.81 1.28 2.73 5.07 7.37 14.01 24 38.89 45.36% 62.03% Escotel 0.14 0.31 0.5 0.59 0.99 Aircel - - 0.54 0.73 1.29 1.76 2.61 5.51 10.61 18.48 48.30% 74.18% MTNL 0.02 0.22 0.35 0.46 1.08 2.05 2.94 3.53 4.48 89.81% 26.91% Spice 0.17 0.27 0.47 0.64 1.21 1.44 1.93 2.73 4.21 4.13 34.03% -1.90% BPL 0.34 0.64 0.9 1.13 1.88 2.58 1.34 1.07 1.29 2.16 -48.06%* 67.44% HFCL 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.15 0.3 0.6 20.00% 30.00% Sistema 0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.1 0.11 0.39 0% 445.45% Total 1.9 3.58 6.54 13 33.69 52.23 90.14 165.1 261.07 391.76 72.62% 50.06% 250 Mar, 09 200 Mar, 08 Mar, 07 150 Mar, 06 Mar, 05 100 Mar, 04 50 Mar, 03 Mar, 02 0 Mar, 01 Mar, 00 Sistema, 0 Bharti, 51.5 BSNL, 58.70 Spice, 34. BPL , 0 HFCL, 20. Bharti, 78. % 3% % Reliance, 55 03% MTNL, 89. 00% 32% BSNL, 78. Aircel .84% Hutch, 27.8 81% 28% , 48.30% 5% %age Reliance, Sistema, 44 Tata, 44.35 Escot Idea, 45.3 growth 65.65% 5.45% % Idea, 62.03 over 6% el, 0.0 0% March, 05 Hutch, 96. Escotel, 0.0 % 92% 0% %age %age MTNL, 26.9 growth Tata, 344. growth 1% over 95% HFCL, 30.00 BPL Spice, - Aircel over FY % , 67.44% March, 05 1.90% , 74.18% 2008 Source of Table: www.indiastat.com and Source of Graph: Based on the above table (author’s work) 41
  • 42. Source: www.trai.gov.in 25000000 20000000 Total 15000000 "C" Circles "B" Circles 10000000 "A" Circles Metros 50000000 0 Mar, 99 Mar, 00 Mar, 01 Mar, 02 Mar, 03 Mar, 04 Mar, 05 Mar, 06 Mar, 07 Source: Based on the above table (author’s work) 42
  • 43. TOP 5 MOBILE OPERATORS' SUBSCRIBER BASE IN INIDA Subscriber Base (in million) March '2003 Subscriber Base (in million) March '2004 6.5 5.53 5.15 7.26 2.73 3.07 2.29 2.16 0.54 1.28 Reliance Bharti BSNL Hutchison Idea % age share on March % age share on March 2003 2004 Reliance Idea 4.15 Idea Hutchis Reliance 9.85 8.1 Hutchis on 21.55 Bharti 15.29 on 23.62 BSNL Bharti 16.62 BSNL 17.62 16.41 19.29 Source of Table: www.indiastat.com and Source of Graph: Based on the above table (author’s work) 43
  • 44. Source: www.vision2020planningsommission.nic.in 8 7 6 Postpaid RPM (Rs.) 5 Postpaid % Change 4 Prepaid RPM (Rs.) Prepaid % Change 3 Blended RPM (Rs.) 2 Blended % Change 1 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 -1 Source of Graph: Based on the above table (author’s work) 44
  • 45. Table 1.13 GROWTH OF TELE-DENSITY FROM 2005-2010 GROWTH OF YEAR TELEDENSITY 2005 9.08 2006 12.86 2007 18.23 2008 26.22 2009 36.98 2010 52.74 Source: TRAI Annual Report 2009-10 GROWTH OF TELE-DENSITY 60 52.74 50 40 36.98 30 26.22 GROWTH OF TELEDENSITY 20 18.23 12.86 10 9.08 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: Based on the above table (author’s work) 45
  • 46. Table1.14 FORECASTING THE TOTAL LANDLINE SUBSCRBERS AND TOTAL MOBILE SUBCRIBERS UPTO 2014-2015 YEAR TOTAL LANDLINE TOTAL MOBILE SUBSCRIBERS SUBSCRIBERS 1999-2000 4450956 3107449 2000-2001 5927282 5478932 2001-2002 7802196 10480430 2002-2003 9598174 21991743 2003-2004 12784986 37378807 2004-2005 22491031 58503224 2005-2006 30684519 105425183 2006-2007 40753412 172219135 2007-2008 58044671 258235642 2008-2009 79315081 380447562 2009-2010 106197268 494036000 2010-2011 114419076 553685876 2011-2012 135196481 660238164 2012-2013 155809740 763813825 2013-2014 174632855 861100772 2014-2015 192215452 950802215 Source: www.trai.gov.in Source: Based on the above table (author’s work) 46
  • 47. Table 1.15 OPERATOR WISE GROWTH OF TELECOM SECTORS IN SUBBSCRIBER BASE ( IN MILLIONS). OPERA 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006 2007 2008 2009- -TORS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 - - - 2010 2007 2008 2009 BHARTI 0.36 0.69 1.35 3.07 6.5 10.98 19.58 37.14 61.98 93.92 107.204 AIRTEL IDEA 0.16 0.34 0.81 1.28 2.73 5.07 7.37 14.01 24 38.89 43.149 RELIAN 0.07 0.19 0.38 0.54 7.26 10.45 17.31 28.01 45.79 72.67 80.722 CE VODAF 0.45 0.71 1.27 2.16 5.15 7.8 15.36 26.44 44.13 68.77 77.713 ONE (HUTCH ) SPICE 0.17 0.27 0.47 0.64 1.21 1.44 1.93 2.73 4.21 4.13 5.186 Source: www.indiastat.com Source: Based on the above table (author’s work) 47
  • 48. Table1.16 SERVICE REVENUE OF INDIAN TELECOM OPERATORS (Rs./Crore). TELECOM 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 OPERATORS BHARTI 37352 41847 59476 65060 AIRTEL RELIANCE 22250 22132 23107 31468 IDEA 10154 12447 15503 16963 MTNL 4587 3751 4380 4380 HCFL 139 204 204 204 Source: Reliance Communications Ltd. Source: Based on the above table (author’s work) 48
  • 49. Table 1.17 CORRELATION BETWEEN MOBILE CALL RATES AND TOTAL MOBILE SUBSCRIBERS. YEAR APPROXIMATE MOBILE TOTAL MOBILE CALL RATES (AVERAGE SUBSCRIBERS OF ALL THE OPERATORS ACROSS ALL THE OPERATOS) 1999-2000 5 3107449 2000-2001 5 5478932 2001-2002 4.28 10480430 2002-2003 3.96 21991743 2003-2004 3.37 37378807 2004-2005 3.19 58503224 2005-2006 2.25 105425183 2006-2007 1.19 172219135 2007-2008 1.76 258235642 2008-2009 0.94 380447562 2009-2010 0.50 494036000 Source: www.trai.gov.in Correlations VAR00002 VAR00003 ** VAR00002 Pearson Correlation 1 -.889 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N 11 11 ** VAR00003 Pearson Correlation -.889 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N 11 11 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). VAR00002: MOBILE CALL RATES VAR00003: TOTAL SUBSCRIBERS Source: Based on the above table (author’s work) 49
  • 50. Table 1.18 TREND IN REVENUE EARNED PER MINUTE (INCOMING + OUTGOING) FOR ALL GSM OPERATORS. YEAR POSTPAID PREPAID 1999-2000 6.55 7.32 2000-2001 4.82 5.65 2001-2002 3.67 5.43 2002-2003 2.55 3.49 2003-2004 1.79 1.39 Source: www.indiastat.com Source: Based on the above table (author’s work) 50
  • 51. Table 1.19 Factor Analysis Correlation Matrix Family Member Recharge Payment/ Local Call Using The Call Free Convenience PromotionalRoaming Internet Coupon Friend Family Messaging Recharge Customer Popularity Of RateSTD Call Rate Network Service Paying Bills In Connectivity Offers connectivity Access Availability Group Pack Kiosk Care the Company Correlation Call Rate 1.000 Local .143 .105 .240 -.222 .203 -.123 .157 .159 .010 .045 .227 .038 .033 .101 STD Call Rate .143 1.000 .027 .033 .107 .166 .106 .424 .229 -.283 .057 -.039 -.159 .074 .122 Family Member Using .105 .027 1.000 .271 .016 .345 .153 .103 .131 .312 .491 .116 .225 .250 .098 The Network Free Call Service .240 .033 .271 1.000 .132 .288 .190 .344 .058 .249 .380 .216 .134 .319 .109 Convenience In Paying -.222 .107 .016 .132 1.000 .046 .021 .125 .060 -.201 .121 -.004 .128 .189 .020 Bills Connectivity .203 .166 .345 .288 .046 1.000 -.014 .364 .210 .044 .383 .174 .289 .444 .298 Promotional Offers-.123 .106 .153 .190 .021 -.014 1.000 .195 .088 .272 .147 .244 .105 .067 .180 Roaming connectivity .157 .424 .103 .344 .125 .364 .195 1.000 .470 -.218 .197 .044 -.067 .338 .083 Internet Access .159 .229 .131 .058 .060 .210 .088 .470 1.000 -.113 .072 .035 -.046 .104 -.003 Recharge Coupon .010 -.283 .312 .249 -.201 .044 .272 -.218 -.113 1.000 .148 .318 .215 .105 .129 Availability Friend Family Group.045 .057 .491 .380 .121 .383 .147 .197 .072 .148 1.000 .295 .220 .399 .319 Messaging Pack .227 -.039 .116 .216 -.004 .174 .244 .044 .035 .318 .295 1.000 .229 .267 .444 Payment/ Recharge Kiosk -.159 .225 .134 .038 .128 .289 .105 -.067 -.046 .215 .220 .229 1.000 .383 .107 Customer Care .033 .074 .250 .319 .189 .444 .067 .338 .104 .105 .399 .267 .383 1.000 .175 Popularity Of the .101 .122 .098 .109 .020 .298 .180 .083 -.003 .129 .319 .444 .107 .175 1.000 Company KMO and Bartlett's Test Kaiser-Mey er-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy . .664 Bart let t's Test of Approx. Chi-Square 343.678 Sphericity df 105 Sig. .000 The KMO value being above .500 denotes that the sample size was adequate. The Significance being .000 denotes that there was no fraudulent data. 51
  • 52. Communalities Initial Extraction Local Call Rate 1.000 .706 STD Call Rat e 1.000 .557 Family Member Using 1.000 .578 The Network Free Call Serv ice 1.000 .451 Conv enience In Pay ing 1.000 .627 Bills Connectiv ity 1.000 .619 Promotional Of f ers 1.000 .775 Roaming connect iv it y 1.000 .744 Internet Access 1.000 .467 Recharge Coupon 1.000 .723 Av ailabilit y Friend Family Group 1.000 .524 Messaging Pack 1.000 .680 Pay ment/ Recharge Kiosk 1.000 .505 Customer Care 1.000 .594 Popularity Of the 1.000 .724 Company Extraction Method: Principal Component Analy sis. Total Variance Explained Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulativ e % Total % of Variance Cumulativ e % Total % of Variance Cumulativ e % 1 3.414 22.763 22.763 3.414 22.763 22.763 2.779 18.525 18.525 2 2.079 13.857 36.620 2.079 13.857 36.620 2.129 14.193 32.718 3 1.393 9.288 45.908 1.393 9.288 45.908 1.567 10.448 43.166 4 1.245 8.298 54.206 1.245 8.298 54.206 1.430 9.534 52.700 5 1.144 7.625 61.831 1.144 7.625 61.831 1.370 9.131 61.831 6 .917 6.111 67.942 7 .882 5.881 73.822 8 .736 4.907 78.729 9 .699 4.663 83.392 10 .561 3.741 87.133 11 .533 3.557 90.690 12 .406 2.709 93.399 13 .384 2.560 95.959 14 .326 2.172 98.131 15 .280 1.869 100.000 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analy sis. 52
  • 53. a Component Matrix Component 1 2 3 4 5 Local Call Rate .273 .141 .644 -.434 -.094 STD Call Rate .202 .658 .136 .225 -.120 Family Member Using .570 -.173 -.052 -.172 .437 The Network Free Call Serv ice .606 -.015 .031 -.029 .287 Conv enience In Pay ing .157 .220 -.696 .205 -.166 Bills Connect iv ity .676 .166 -.040 -.341 -.126 Promotional Of f ers .327 -.130 .081 .754 .276 Roaming connectiv it y .494 .678 .049 .124 .150 Internet Access .288 .540 .164 .039 .253 Recharge Coupon .295 -.686 .211 .118 .327 Av ailabilit y Friend Family Group .698 -.109 -.155 -.027 .024 Messaging Pack .523 -.333 .299 .235 -.388 Pay ment/ Recharge Kiosk .428 -.371 -.338 -.230 -.129 Customer Care .664 .025 -.337 -.162 -.113 Popularity Of the .469 -.135 .222 .287 -.595 Company Extraction Method: Principal Component Analy sis. a. 5 components extract ed. Component Transformation Matrix Component 1 2 3 4 5 1 .833 .307 .396 .229 .052 2 -.138 .900 -.191 -.349 -.112 3 -.311 .191 .291 .177 .867 4 -.407 .218 .357 .675 -.452 5 .156 .108 -.771 .583 .172 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analy sis. Rotation Met hod: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. 53
  • 54. From the above Rotated Factor Analysis we have come out with new factors which are the bases for selecting a network: Factor 1-Free call services within family or a groups. Factor 2- STD facilities and Internet Services being provided. Factor 3- The popularity of the company. Factor 4- Recharge booths should be located close by. Factor 5- Local call rates should be low and payment process should be easy. From the table of total variance explained we see the cumulative importance of each of the above five factors. The total cumulative importances of these five factors are 61.831%. The individual importances of each of the factors are: Factor 1- 18.525 % Factor 2- 14.193% Factor 3- 10.448% Fator 4- 9.534% Factor 5- 9.131% These factors together make up the five most important factors of the analysis. The rotated component matrix converges after 10 rotations to signify that none of the factors are similar in nature and that the sample size is adequate. 54
  • 55. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. India Today 2. Economic Times 3. Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India (TRAI) Annual report 2009-2010 4. www.ibef.org/industry/telecommunications.aspx 5. Vision2020planningcommission.nic.in/reports/genrep/bkpap2020/1_bg2020.doc 6. http://www.indiastat.com/telecommunication/data.htm 7. http://www.currentanalysis.com/markets/telecomindustry/?gclid=COX74bLX7KsCFcka6 wodnywLPA 8. http://www.trai.gov.in 9. EIS in our college library 10. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_in_India 11. economictimes.indiatimes.com/Market 12. www.cci.in/pdf/surveys_reports/indias_telecom_sector.pdf 13. http://www.dot.gov.in/osp/Brochure/Brochure.htm 14. http://www.pppinindia.com/pdf/ppp_position_paper_telecom_122k9.pdf 15. Company Sites www.vodafone.in and www.airtel.in exim.indiamart.com › Indian Budget › Budget 2009-2010 16. http://www.articlesbase.com/communication-articles/indian-telecom-industry-key- milestones-3134671.html 17. http://www.sibm.edu.in/Final_Pre_Budget_Analysis_2010.pdf 18. http://www.telecomindiaonline.com/cmai-budget-recendations-for-fy-2010-11.html 55
  • 56. 19. http://www.telecomindiaonline.com/telecom-reports-on-telecom-kiosk-at-telecom-india- daily.html 20. www.dnb.co.in/IndianTelecomIndustry/OverviewTI.asp 21. www.tradechakra.com › ... › Industries 22. www.indialawoffices.com/pdf/telecommunication.pdf 23. business.mapsofindia.com › Communications Industry 24. planningcommission.nic.in/reports/genrep/.../1_bg2020.doc 25. siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRADE/.../Singh.pdf – 26. www.cci.in/pdf/surveys_reports/indias_telecom_sector.pdf 27. http://telecomtalk.info/india-officially-scaled-the-500-million-telecom-subscriber- base/11971/ 28. http://www.trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/trai/upload/PressReleases/706/pr4nov09no73.pdf 29. http://www.coai.com/docs/ARPU Revenue Analysis - Oct-Dec 09-FINAL.xls 30. http://www.siliconindia.com/shownews/Network_congestion_increases_in_major_cities- nid-29716.html 31. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34509513/ & Electricsense.com article, 2010, 32. Das, N.G., Statistical Methods Volume 1, Tata Mcgraw Hill Publications, New Delhi, Pages: 27-36, 287-398. 33. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/forecasting.asp 34. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_prediction 56
  • 57. QUESTIONAIRE NAME: AGE: OCCUPATION: CONTACT NUMBER: INCOME: <10000 10000-25000 >25000 (PER MONTH) GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: MONTHLY EXPENDITURE: PREPAID POSTPAID The Grading system followed below is as follows: 1. Not Important at All 2. Not So Important 3. Important 4. Very Important 5. Extremely important 57
  • 58. WHILE SELECTING A CONNECTION HOW MUCH IMPORTANCE WOULD YOU GIVE TO THE FOLLOWING FACTORS FACTORS 1 2 3 4 5 LOCAL CALL RATES STD CALL RATES FAMILY MEMBERS USING A NETWORK FREE CALL SERVICE WIYHIN THE SAME NETWORK AND OUTSIDE THE NETWORK CONVENIENCE IN PAYING BILLS STRENGHT OF CONNECTIVITY(NETWORK) FREQUENT PROMOTIONAL OFFERS ROAMING CONNECTIVITY INTERNET CONNECTIVITY AVAILABILITY OF RECHARGE COUPONS FAMILY/FRIEND GROUPS MESSAGING PACKS CLOSENESS OF PAYMENT/RECHARGE KIOSK NATURE AND EFFICIENCY OF CUSTOMER CARE POPULARITY OF THE COMPANY 58
  • 59. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE FOLLOWING FACTORS OF THE NETWORK YOU ARE CURRENTLY ON : FACTORS 1 2 3 4 5 LOCAL CALL RATES STD CALL RATES FAMILY MEMBERS USING A NETWORK FREE CALL SERVICE WIYHIN THE SAME NETWORK AND OUTSIDE THE NETWORK CONVENIENCE IN PAYING BILLS STRENGHT OF CONNECTIVITY(NETWORK) FREQUENT PROMOTIONAL OFFERS ROAMING CONNECTIVITY INTERNET CONNECTIVITY AVAILABILITY OF RECHARGE COUPONS FAMILY/FRIEND GROUPS MESSAGING PACKS CLOSENESS OF PAYMENT/RECHARGE KIOSK NATURE AND EFFICIENCY OF CUSTOMER CARE POPULARITY OF THE COMPANY 59