SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 31
Download to read offline
The effects of atmospheric elements on
customer impression: The case of hotel
lobbies




               Presenter: Anne Chen
               Instructor: Dr. Pi-Ying Teresa Hsu
               Date: April 8, 2013
                                                    1
Citation
Countryman, C., & Jang, S. (2006). The effects of
atmospheric elements on customer impression:
The case of hotel lobbies. International Journal of
Contemporary Hospitality Management, 18(7),
534-545.




                                                      2
Contents
Ⅰ      Introduction

Ⅱ    Literature Review

Ⅲ      Methodology

Ⅳ   Result & Conclusion

Ⅴ       Limitation

Ⅵ       Reflection
                          3
Introduction
If the physical environment had an effect on
human behavior, it would also influence the
behavior of individuals in consumer settings
such as retail stores.
                             (Kotler ,1973)




                                               4
Introduction
A hotel lobby could be considered one of the
most important servicescape because of its
impact in forming many of the first
impressions by guests.




                                               5
Purpose
To identify which elements of physical
environment significantly influence a
customer’s impression on hotel lobby




                                         6
Literature Review




                7
Literature Review
The architectural style of a hotel did have an
impact on the profitability and success of the hotel.




                           (Siguaw & Enz ,1999)

                                                        8
Literature Review
Architectural design books argue that the layout is
contingent on several factors including the size of
the hotel, grade or standard, patterns of arrivals
and departures, tour and convention bookings,
length of stay, and seasonality.

                           (Lawson, 1976; Rutes &
                           Penner, 1985)



                                                      9
Literature Review
Color has the ability to attract customers and
the ability to create pleasant feelings among
customers.


                          (Bellizzi et al., 1983;
                          Bellizzi & Hite, 1992)




                                                    10
Literature Review
As for perceived image, soft incandescent lighting
is usually associated with a higher quality
environment, while bright fluorescent lighting is
associated with a discount image.


                          (Baker et al., 1994;
                          Sharma and Stafford, 2000)




                                                     11
Hypotheses
H1: Style has a significant impact on customers’
    impression of the hotel lobby.

H2: Layout has a significant relationship to
    customers’ impression of the hotel lobby.

H3: Colors have a significant effect on customers’
    impression of the hotel lobby.



                                                     12
Hypotheses
H4: Lighting has a significant influence on
    customers’ impression of the hotel lobby.

H5: Furnishings have a significant association with
    customers’ impression of the hotel lobby.




                                                      13
Methodology




          14
A scenario approach
    The researcher use 2 color photographs of hotel
1   lobbies.



2   The name of the specific hotel was not given.



    No identification was visible in the photographs
3   to control for the influence of branding.

                                                       15
Methodology
  Different university
                         Randomly shown one
faculty by convenience
                         of four hotel lobbies
        sample


                 Participants

    105 responses           Online survey
      102 valid


                                                 16
Result




         17
Table I. Atmospheric elements and items
Atmospheric elements and items   Mean (scale:-3~+3)   Standard deviation   Reliability Alpha
Style                                                                             0.86
Current                                  1.09                 1.52
Refined                                  1.26                 1.10
Artful                                   0.76                 1.52
Beautiful                                1.01                 1.30
Impressive                               0.90                 1.40
Layout                                                                            0.85
Graceful                                 0.66                 1.63
Proportionate                            0.70                 1.67
Accommodating                            0.80                 1.66
Uncluttered                              1.19                 1.82
Colors                                                                            0.95
Beautiful                                0.89                 1.48
Soothing                                 0.73                 1.36
Pleasant                                 0.95                 1.41
Lighting                                                                          0.95
Appropriate                              1.42                 1.46
Inviting                                 1.25                 1.55
Positive                                 1.33                 1.50
Furnishings                                                                       0.73
Beautiful                                0.73                 1.48
Comfortable                              0.87                 1.43
High quality                             1.12                 1.33
                                                                                               18
Table II. Measurement model results
                                                                                                 Average
                                            Standardized                                         variance
 Atmospheric elements and items                                         t-value
                                           factor loadings                                   extracted(AVE)
                                                                                                   (%)
Style                                                                                             58.56
Current                                          0.59                     -
Refined                                          0.79                   5.99*
Artful                                           0.69                   5.50*
Beautiful                                        0.91                   6.47*
Impressive                                       0.81                   6.22*
Layout                                                                                           62.98
Graceful                                         0.90                     -
Proportionate                                    0.84                  10.93*
Accommodating                                    0.85                  11.33*
Uncluttered                                      0.53                   5.70*
Colors                                                                                           84.77
Beautiful                                        0.90                     -
Soothing                                         0.89                  14.13*
Pleasant                                         0.97                  17.45*
Lighting                                                                                         86.55
Appropriate                                      0.90                     -
Inviting                                         0.96                  16.88*
Positive                                         0.93                  15.36*
Note:*p≦0.001
The first path of each construct was set to 1, so no t – value was given to the first path                19
Table II. Measurement model results
                                                                                                 Average
                                            Standardized                                         variance
 Atmospheric elements and items                                         t-value
                                           factor loadings                                   extracted(AVE)
                                                                                                   (%)
Furnishings                                                                                       47.55
Beautiful                                        0.75                      -
Comfortable                                      0.60                    5.89*
High quality                                     0.71                    6.90*
Overall lobby impression                                                                         87.49
Good                                             0.94                      -
Beautiful                                        0.90                   16.23*
Inviting                                         0.97                   21.97*
Comfortable                                      0.93                   18.92*
Model fit statistics
X2(194):                                                           365.4(p=0.00)
X2 /d.f.:                                                               1.88
Normed Fit Index(NFI):                                                 0.891
Tucker-Lewis Index(TLI or NNFI):
                                                                       0.908
Comparative Fit Index(CFI):                                            0.923
Root Mean Square Error of
                                                                       0.079
Approximation(RMSEA):
Note:*p≦0.001
The first path of each construct was set to 1, so no t – value was given to the first path
                                                                                                         20
Figure 1. A structural model for lobby impression
                                                    21
Figure 1. A structural model for lobby impression
                                                    22
Table III. Structural model results
Path                             Standardized parameter estimate(β)   t-value
Style → Lobby impression(β11)                   0.32                  2.63*
Layout → Lobby impression(β12)                  0.03                  0.34
Colors → Lobby impression(β13)                  0.39                  3.49**
Lighting → Lobby                                0.26                  3.46**
impression(β14)
R-Square                                      0.799
Model fit statistics
X2(142):                                      279.2(p=0.00)
X2/d.f.:                                      1.97
Normed Fit Index(NFI):                        0.903
Tucker-Lewis Index(TLI or                     0.919
NNFI):
Comparative Fit Index(CFI):                   0.933
Root Mean Square Error of
Approximation(RMSEA):                         0.079

Note:*p≦0.01,**p≦0.001
                                                                                23
Hypotheses Supported or Unsupported

 H1: Style has a significant impact on customers’ impression of the hotel
     lobby.                                                                   
 H2: Layout has a significant relationship to customers’ impression of the
    hotel lobby.                                                              
 H3: Colors have a significant effect on customers’ impression of the hotel
    lobby.                                                                    
 H4: Lighting has a significant influence on customers’ impression of the
    hotel lobby.                                                              




                                                                                  24
Conclusion




         25
Conclusion
The atmospheric elements for the style, colors,
and lighting significantly influence lobby
impression.

Colors appeared to be most influential,
suggesting that hoteliers need to take special
care in selecting the colors used in their
facilities.



                                                  26
Limitation




         27
Limitation
The study focused only on the hotel lobby, so
the application of the results has to be
confined to the hotel lobby.

This research primarily focused on business
hotels, which is one classification of hotel.




                                                28
Reflection




             29
Reflection
The color is first impression for customers
so that hotel practitioner need to careful the
color.

Due to many researchers research familiar
atmospheric elements in the past time,
further research can focus on rare elements.




                                                 30
Thank you
     for
 listening.




              31

More Related Content

More from seashell09

10122607 陳俐君 (the effects of dining atmospherics on behavioral intentions thr...
10122607 陳俐君 (the effects of dining atmospherics on behavioral intentions thr...10122607 陳俐君 (the effects of dining atmospherics on behavioral intentions thr...
10122607 陳俐君 (the effects of dining atmospherics on behavioral intentions thr...seashell09
 
10122607 陳俐君 final proposal (102.06.15)
10122607 陳俐君 final proposal (102.06.15)10122607 陳俐君 final proposal (102.06.15)
10122607 陳俐君 final proposal (102.06.15)seashell09
 
10122607 陳俐君(the effects of atmospheric elements on customer impression the ...
10122607 陳俐君(the effects of atmospheric elements on customer impression  the ...10122607 陳俐君(the effects of atmospheric elements on customer impression  the ...
10122607 陳俐君(the effects of atmospheric elements on customer impression the ...seashell09
 
10122607 陳俐君 final proposal
10122607 陳俐君 final proposal10122607 陳俐君 final proposal
10122607 陳俐君 final proposalseashell09
 
10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...
10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...
10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...seashell09
 
10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...
10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...
10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...seashell09
 
10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behavior
10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behavior10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behavior
10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behaviorseashell09
 
10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behavior
10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behavior10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behavior
10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behaviorseashell09
 

More from seashell09 (8)

10122607 陳俐君 (the effects of dining atmospherics on behavioral intentions thr...
10122607 陳俐君 (the effects of dining atmospherics on behavioral intentions thr...10122607 陳俐君 (the effects of dining atmospherics on behavioral intentions thr...
10122607 陳俐君 (the effects of dining atmospherics on behavioral intentions thr...
 
10122607 陳俐君 final proposal (102.06.15)
10122607 陳俐君 final proposal (102.06.15)10122607 陳俐君 final proposal (102.06.15)
10122607 陳俐君 final proposal (102.06.15)
 
10122607 陳俐君(the effects of atmospheric elements on customer impression the ...
10122607 陳俐君(the effects of atmospheric elements on customer impression  the ...10122607 陳俐君(the effects of atmospheric elements on customer impression  the ...
10122607 陳俐君(the effects of atmospheric elements on customer impression the ...
 
10122607 陳俐君 final proposal
10122607 陳俐君 final proposal10122607 陳俐君 final proposal
10122607 陳俐君 final proposal
 
10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...
10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...
10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...
 
10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...
10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...
10122607 陳俐君(hotel restaurant dining the relationship between perceived value...
 
10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behavior
10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behavior10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behavior
10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behavior
 
10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behavior
10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behavior10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behavior
10122607 陳俐君internet marketing involvement and consumer behavior
 

10122607 陳俐君(the effects of atmospheric elements on customer impression the case of hotel lobbies)

  • 1. The effects of atmospheric elements on customer impression: The case of hotel lobbies Presenter: Anne Chen Instructor: Dr. Pi-Ying Teresa Hsu Date: April 8, 2013 1
  • 2. Citation Countryman, C., & Jang, S. (2006). The effects of atmospheric elements on customer impression: The case of hotel lobbies. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 18(7), 534-545. 2
  • 3. Contents Ⅰ Introduction Ⅱ Literature Review Ⅲ Methodology Ⅳ Result & Conclusion Ⅴ Limitation Ⅵ Reflection 3
  • 4. Introduction If the physical environment had an effect on human behavior, it would also influence the behavior of individuals in consumer settings such as retail stores. (Kotler ,1973) 4
  • 5. Introduction A hotel lobby could be considered one of the most important servicescape because of its impact in forming many of the first impressions by guests. 5
  • 6. Purpose To identify which elements of physical environment significantly influence a customer’s impression on hotel lobby 6
  • 8. Literature Review The architectural style of a hotel did have an impact on the profitability and success of the hotel. (Siguaw & Enz ,1999) 8
  • 9. Literature Review Architectural design books argue that the layout is contingent on several factors including the size of the hotel, grade or standard, patterns of arrivals and departures, tour and convention bookings, length of stay, and seasonality. (Lawson, 1976; Rutes & Penner, 1985) 9
  • 10. Literature Review Color has the ability to attract customers and the ability to create pleasant feelings among customers. (Bellizzi et al., 1983; Bellizzi & Hite, 1992) 10
  • 11. Literature Review As for perceived image, soft incandescent lighting is usually associated with a higher quality environment, while bright fluorescent lighting is associated with a discount image. (Baker et al., 1994; Sharma and Stafford, 2000) 11
  • 12. Hypotheses H1: Style has a significant impact on customers’ impression of the hotel lobby. H2: Layout has a significant relationship to customers’ impression of the hotel lobby. H3: Colors have a significant effect on customers’ impression of the hotel lobby. 12
  • 13. Hypotheses H4: Lighting has a significant influence on customers’ impression of the hotel lobby. H5: Furnishings have a significant association with customers’ impression of the hotel lobby. 13
  • 15. A scenario approach The researcher use 2 color photographs of hotel 1 lobbies. 2 The name of the specific hotel was not given. No identification was visible in the photographs 3 to control for the influence of branding. 15
  • 16. Methodology Different university Randomly shown one faculty by convenience of four hotel lobbies sample Participants 105 responses Online survey 102 valid 16
  • 17. Result 17
  • 18. Table I. Atmospheric elements and items Atmospheric elements and items Mean (scale:-3~+3) Standard deviation Reliability Alpha Style 0.86 Current 1.09 1.52 Refined 1.26 1.10 Artful 0.76 1.52 Beautiful 1.01 1.30 Impressive 0.90 1.40 Layout 0.85 Graceful 0.66 1.63 Proportionate 0.70 1.67 Accommodating 0.80 1.66 Uncluttered 1.19 1.82 Colors 0.95 Beautiful 0.89 1.48 Soothing 0.73 1.36 Pleasant 0.95 1.41 Lighting 0.95 Appropriate 1.42 1.46 Inviting 1.25 1.55 Positive 1.33 1.50 Furnishings 0.73 Beautiful 0.73 1.48 Comfortable 0.87 1.43 High quality 1.12 1.33 18
  • 19. Table II. Measurement model results Average Standardized variance Atmospheric elements and items t-value factor loadings extracted(AVE) (%) Style 58.56 Current 0.59 - Refined 0.79 5.99* Artful 0.69 5.50* Beautiful 0.91 6.47* Impressive 0.81 6.22* Layout 62.98 Graceful 0.90 - Proportionate 0.84 10.93* Accommodating 0.85 11.33* Uncluttered 0.53 5.70* Colors 84.77 Beautiful 0.90 - Soothing 0.89 14.13* Pleasant 0.97 17.45* Lighting 86.55 Appropriate 0.90 - Inviting 0.96 16.88* Positive 0.93 15.36* Note:*p≦0.001 The first path of each construct was set to 1, so no t – value was given to the first path 19
  • 20. Table II. Measurement model results Average Standardized variance Atmospheric elements and items t-value factor loadings extracted(AVE) (%) Furnishings 47.55 Beautiful 0.75 - Comfortable 0.60 5.89* High quality 0.71 6.90* Overall lobby impression 87.49 Good 0.94 - Beautiful 0.90 16.23* Inviting 0.97 21.97* Comfortable 0.93 18.92* Model fit statistics X2(194): 365.4(p=0.00) X2 /d.f.: 1.88 Normed Fit Index(NFI): 0.891 Tucker-Lewis Index(TLI or NNFI): 0.908 Comparative Fit Index(CFI): 0.923 Root Mean Square Error of 0.079 Approximation(RMSEA): Note:*p≦0.001 The first path of each construct was set to 1, so no t – value was given to the first path 20
  • 21. Figure 1. A structural model for lobby impression 21
  • 22. Figure 1. A structural model for lobby impression 22
  • 23. Table III. Structural model results Path Standardized parameter estimate(β) t-value Style → Lobby impression(β11) 0.32 2.63* Layout → Lobby impression(β12) 0.03 0.34 Colors → Lobby impression(β13) 0.39 3.49** Lighting → Lobby 0.26 3.46** impression(β14) R-Square 0.799 Model fit statistics X2(142): 279.2(p=0.00) X2/d.f.: 1.97 Normed Fit Index(NFI): 0.903 Tucker-Lewis Index(TLI or 0.919 NNFI): Comparative Fit Index(CFI): 0.933 Root Mean Square Error of Approximation(RMSEA): 0.079 Note:*p≦0.01,**p≦0.001 23
  • 24. Hypotheses Supported or Unsupported H1: Style has a significant impact on customers’ impression of the hotel lobby.  H2: Layout has a significant relationship to customers’ impression of the hotel lobby.  H3: Colors have a significant effect on customers’ impression of the hotel lobby.  H4: Lighting has a significant influence on customers’ impression of the hotel lobby.  24
  • 26. Conclusion The atmospheric elements for the style, colors, and lighting significantly influence lobby impression. Colors appeared to be most influential, suggesting that hoteliers need to take special care in selecting the colors used in their facilities. 26
  • 28. Limitation The study focused only on the hotel lobby, so the application of the results has to be confined to the hotel lobby. This research primarily focused on business hotels, which is one classification of hotel. 28
  • 30. Reflection The color is first impression for customers so that hotel practitioner need to careful the color. Due to many researchers research familiar atmospheric elements in the past time, further research can focus on rare elements. 30
  • 31. Thank you for listening. 31