2. HIV, Hepatitis B and C: global prevalence
1. WHO Factsheets HBV, HCV, HIV; 2. Alter MJ. J Hepatol 2006; 44(Suppl.1): S6-S9.
350.000.000
170.000.000
33.000.000
2-4.000.000
4-5.000.000
3.
4. Prevalence of HBsAg+ in HIV Infected
Patients
EuroSIDA Cohort (n= 9802) :
Patients screened for HBsAg: 5883 (60%)
HBsAg+: 530 (9%)
- South: 9.1%
- Central: 9.2%
- North: 9.7%
- East: 6%
Konopnicki D, et al. AIDS. 2005.
6. Influence of HIV on CHB
In the Pre HAART era, HIV in HBsAg positive patients (compared to
HBV mono-infected):
Increased the risk of chronic infection after contamination
Reduced the seroconversion rates to anti-HBe and anti- HBs
Increased HBV replication
Frequent reactivation related to CD4 decline
Accelerated fibrosis progression
Increased risk of liver decompensation, HCC and liver death
Bodsworth, JID 1989 ; Hadler, JID 1991 ; Krogsgaard, Hepatology 1987 ; Bodsworth, JID 1989 ; Gilson, AIDS 1997. Piroth, J
Hepatol 2002; Vogel Cancer Res 1991; Corallini Cncer Res 1993 ; Altavilla Am J Pathol 2000 ; Bodsworth, JID 1989 ; Mills,
Gastroenterol 1990 ; Goldin, J Clin Pathol 1990 ; Gilson, AIDS 1997 ; Thio, Lancet 2002 ; Di Martino, Gastroenterol 2002; Colin
Hepatol 1999; Perillo, Ann Int Med 1986 ; McDonald, J Hepatol 1987
7. Treatment of HBV in HIV Co-infected Patients
Licensed for
HIV HBV
Interferon (IFN)
Lamivudine (LAM)
Emtricitabine (FTC)
Entecavir (ETV)
Telbivudine (LDT)
Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV)
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
(TDF)
8. TDF vs. TDF+LAM (48 weeks)
3/50
12/50
29/50
42/50
1/25
9/25
14/25
19/25
0
20
40
60
80
100
DNA<3
log
AST<45
U/L
HBeAg
loss
HBsAg
loss
Patients(%)
TDF TDF+LAM
Schmutz G, et al. AIDS. 2006.
LAM
Naive
(n=9)
LAM
Experienced
(n=47)
HBV DNA <15
UI/mL
9 41
Mean time to
DNA < LOD
(weeks)
49 67
Tuma R, et al. AASLD 2008, Abstract 967.
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
TDF + LAM (48 weeks)
9. Matthews G et al. Hepatology 2008
W48 outcomes
LAM
N=12
TDF
N=12
TDF+LAM
N=12
p
Median DNA Reduction 4.07 4.57 4.73 .7
DNA <3 log 46% 92% 91% .01
HBeAg loss 3 1 3
Anti-HBe Seroconversion 1 1 3
HBsAg loss 1 1 1
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
TDF- vs LAM- containing HAART in ARV-naïve HIV/HBeAg+ Co-infected Patients (TICO Study):
Randomized Thai trial (1:1:1) of LAM vs TDF vs LAM/TDF within an EFV-based HAART regimen
10. Treatment Algorithm
Patients with Compensated Liver Disease and
No Indication for HIV Therapy (CD4 count >350/µL)
• No treatment
• Monitor every
6–12 months
HBV DNA
2000 IU/mL
HBV DNA
HBV DNA
<2000 IU/mL
ALT Elevated
ALT Normal
• Monitor ALT every
3-12 months
• Consider biopsy
and treat if disease
present
• PEG IFN
• LdT (if HBV DNA>LOD at w24 add ADV)
• ADV+LdT
• Early HAART initiation –TDF+LAM/FTC
ECC Statement. J Hepatol. 2005.
Rockstroh et al. HIV Medicine 2008.
11. Treatment Algorithm
Patients with Compensated Liver Disease and
Indication for HIV Therapy (CD4 count <350/µL)
HBV DNA
≥2000 IU/ml
HBV DNA
<2000 IU/ml
HAART including
TDF+3T/FTC
Substitute one NRTI by
TDF or add TDF*
Patients without
HBV-associated
LAM resistance
Patients with
cirrhosis
ECC Statement. J Hepatol. 2005.
Rockstroh et al. HIV Medicine 2008.
Patients with
HBV-associated
LAM resistance
HAART regimen
of choice
HAART including
TDF+LAM/FTC
*If feasible and appropriate from the perspective
of maintaining HIV suppression.
Refer patient for liver
transplantation
evaluation if
decompensation
HBV DNA
12. Conclusions
Viral hepatitis coinfections are major factors of
mortality and morbidity in the HIV infected population
It is crucial to determine those patients who are in
need for treatment
Viral and host factors can predict the chance of cure
DAAs for HCV will soon be available but lack data on
HIV coinfection
Tenofovir is the actual agent of choice in HBV
coinfection
22. Phase 3 PHOTON-1 Study Design
All-Oral Therapy of SOF + RBV in HCV/HIV Co-infection
Sulkowski MS, et al. AASLD 2013. Washington, DC. Oral #212
0 12 24 36
SOF 400mg + RBV 1000-1200mg SVR12
SOF 400mg + RBV 1000-1200 mg SVR12
Study Week
GT 2,3 TN
n=68
GT 1 TN
n=114
SOF 400mg + RBV 1000-1200 mg SVR12
GT 2,3 TE
n=41
Broad inclusion criteria
– Cirrhosis permitted with no platelet cutoff
– Hemoglobin: ≥12 mg/dL (males); ≥11 mg/dL (females)
Wide range of ART regimens allowed
– Undetectable HIV RNA for >8 weeks on stable ART regimen
Baseline CD4 count
– ART treated: CD4 T-cell count >200 cells/mm3 and HIV RNA < 50 c/mL
– ART untreated: CD4 T-cell count >500 cells/mm3
No response guided therapy
23. 76
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
SVR12
HCVRNA<25IU/mL(%)
88
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
SVR12
67
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
SVR12
GT1 TN1
SOF + RBV
x24 weeks
GT2 TN1
SOF + RBV
x12 weeks
GT3 TN1
SOF + RBV
x12 weeks
GT3 TE2
SOF + RBV
x24 weeks
92
0
20
40
60
80
100
SVR12
1. Sulkowski MS, et al. AASLD 2013. Washington, DC. Oral #212;
2. SOVALDI™ [PI]. Gilead Sciences, Inc. Foster City, CA December 2013
87/114 23/26 28/42 12/13
PHOTON-1 SVR12
All-Oral Therapy of SOF + RBV in GT1, 2, 3 HCV Treatment-Naive
and GT 3 Treatment-Experienced/HIV Co-infection
An all-oral regimen of SOF + RBV for 12–24 weeks resulted in high SVR12 rates in TN GT 1, 2 and 3 and TE
GT 3 CHC with HIV coinfection – with SVR12 rates similar to mono-infection
No HCV resistance was observed
– No S282T mutations were observed in virologic failures via deep sequencing
Two patients had HCV breakthrough; both had documented non-adherence to SOF
Two other patients had transient HIV breakthrough; both had documented non-adherence to ART
29. Drug-drug interactions
Traitement anti-VHC
Simeprevir Daclatasvir Sofosbuvir
Traitementanti-VIH
INTI
zidovudine
abacavir
Lamivudine/
emtricitabine
tenofovir
INNTI
Efavirenz ↑ DCV de 50%
Nevirapine ? ? ?
Etravirine ? ? ?
Rilpivirine
IP
Darunavir/r
Atazanavir/r ? ↓ DCV de 50%
Lopinavir/r ? ? ?
AI
Raltegravir
Dolutegravir ? ? ?
Elvitegravir ? ?
CCR5
Maraviroc ? ?
Ne pas utiliser en raison d’interactions importantes
Ne pas utiliser car pas de données d’interactions disponibles
Utiliser avec précaution (effectuer si besoin des dosages pharmacologiques)
Pas d’interaction rapportée, utilisation sans risque
?