SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Download to read offline
Canadian carriers    Open-skies deal         Coalition forges             Special Reports: West Coast Ports;
contest US fees      no boon for cargo       PNW security network         Transportation Intermediaries
            VOLUME 8, ISSUE 14          APRIL 9, 2007                        WWW.JOC.COM        $5.00




                The weekly newsmagazine of international trade and logistics, founded in 1827




          Intermodal
             overhaul

                                                               Maersk changes the way
                                                               it moves containers
                                                               in North America
CONTAINER SHIPPING




                                                                                A dollar
                                                                                   here,
                                                                                a dollar
BY PETER T. LEACH                                                                 there
W
               ith big-box retailers         The money involved in erroneous
               paying ocean freight      billing for any one shipment may not
               bills that add up to      be much, but multiply an incorrect
               millions of dollars a     billing by the thousands of contain-   errors in their own accounting sys-
year, they often find it hard to track   ers that may have been billed wrong    tems that may save them additional
whether their carriers have fulfilled    and that can add up to real money.     money on future shipments.
the contracted freight rate for every    That’s why a number of retailers are       “Sometimes a carrier contract
container they deliver. Their carriers   turning to a company called Ocean      has been signed and the cargo has
may not have recorded the pickup or      Freight Refunds Inc., which per-       been received on such and such a
delivery of a box on the correct date,   forms post-shipment audits for         date, but it doesn’t get through all
or may have billed the shipper at the    importers before their three-year      the systems, so you might get
wrong rate. The billing errors can       statute of limitations on contract     charged $75 more or $75 less,” said
result from fluctuating freight rates,   claims runs out. They are getting      Ray Burdgett, director of interna-
changes in surcharges or mistakes in     significant amounts of money back      tional transportation at Pier 1
inputting on both the carrier and        from their carriers, and they are      Imports in Fort Worth. “The biggest
shipper sides.                           using the audits to find and fix       thing we found is in mistakes in tim-


                          Costs from erroneous billing
                        can add up quickly for shippers.
                          Here’s a way they can fix it.
CONTAINER SHIPPING




ing and rate changes that weren’t           fixed fee is refunded in full,               Land Service Inc., has started to
reflected in the system or billed           Ferreira said.                               audit ocean freight shipments. He
properly.”                                      He said one of the five biggest          sold the first one, Tradechek, to an
    Pier 1 contracted with Ocean            U.S. retailers has just signed a con-        accounting firm in 1997. He started
Freight Refunds to audit its ocean          tract under the new pricing struc-           Ocean Freight Refunds in 2004,
shipments for 2003, 2004 and 2005.          ture. Ferreira prefers the second            after his non-compete period ended.
“We did get back a substantial              pricing model for his business               The new company has already land-
amount of money,” Burdgett said.            because he would rather collect the          ed contracts for audit services with
“The biggest thing we found is in           fixed fee upfront than wait the              15 of the top 100 U.S. importers
mistakes in timing and rate changes         three or four months to collect half         ranked by PIERS Global Intel-
that weren’t reflected on the system        of the amount carriers refund to             ligence Solutions, a sister company
or billed properly.”                        his customers.                               of The Journal of Commerce. In
    Burdgett said the audit also                Ocean Freight Refunds uses               addition to Pier 1 Imports, some of
showed Pier 1’s carriers where they         proprietary software to match its            the company’s customers include
had made mistakes. “It was also dif-        customers’ shipment records and              Hasbro, Big Lots, J.C. Penney and
ficult on our steamship partners            contract rates against the invoices          TJX, the parent of TJ Maxx. ◆
because they don’t like to give             submitted by the carriers to spot
money back,” he said. “They didn’t          any anomalies in the pricing and             Peter Leach can be contacted at
know either. It’s not like they were        delivery dates.                              pleach@joc.com.
hiding something from us. Unless                “We code their historic invoices,
                                                                                         Readers of the digital edition of The Journal of
somebody finds those mistakes,              which gives us an idea of what the           Commerce who want more information can click on:
they’ll go forever and no one will          rates should have been at any point          www.oceanfreightrefunds.com
                                                                                         To receive the JoC digital edition,
ever find them.”                            in time,” Ferreira said. The software        call (888) 215-6084.
    He said that although Pier 1’s          catches about 80 percent of the
system for tracking ocean shipments         anomalies and errors, and human
and bills was “doing a pretty good          scrutiny catches the rest. Because
job, the audit pointed out the areas        every company uses different sys-
we have problems with that we were          tems, the audit must be customized
able to go in and fix.” Now that            for every client. “It’s a very simple
Pier 1 has fixed its own auditing sys-      process, but it has to be cus-
tem, it does not plan to use Ocean          tomized for every client,
Freight Refunds’ audit system again.        Ferreira said. “J.C. Penney
    “That’s one of the benefits I give      and TJX have very differ-
the clients,” said Steve Ferreira,          ent processes.”
founder and owner of Ocean                      Ocean Freight
Freight Refunds. “I tell them that          Refunds is the sec-
they can take all the reports I gener-      ond company that
ate for them, and they can either use       Ferreira, an alum-
me going forward every six or 12            nus of Sea-
months, or they can use the reports
to fix their own system.”
    Ferreira offers customers two
pricing models. Under the one he
has been using for the past three
years, clients pay a contingency fee
of 50 percent of the amount of the
refunds the audit helps them recov-
er from their carriers. Under the
new pricing model he introduced
recently, his customers pay a fixed
fee upfront for a guaranteed
amount of refunds. If the refunds
gained through the company’s
audit don’t add up to the
amount guaranteed, then the
                              Reprinted from The Journal of Commerce, April 9, 2007 • www.joc.com
                                  ©Copyright 2007 The Journal of Commerce. All rights reserved
             Published with copyright permission from The Journal of Commerce. http://www.joc.com/copyrights – 4//07

More Related Content

Similar to Oceanfreight

Crowley petroleum-services-case-study
Crowley petroleum-services-case-studyCrowley petroleum-services-case-study
Crowley petroleum-services-case-study
iipmff2
 
Freight Payment Benchmark Study March 2013
Freight Payment Benchmark Study March 2013Freight Payment Benchmark Study March 2013
Freight Payment Benchmark Study March 2013
CustomsPlus
 
Recovering from Reform4
Recovering from Reform4Recovering from Reform4
Recovering from Reform4
BeckyRhodes
 
Risks of non compliance of cl.19.7 cl.20 under BPVOY4.
Risks of non compliance of cl.19.7 cl.20 under BPVOY4.Risks of non compliance of cl.19.7 cl.20 under BPVOY4.
Risks of non compliance of cl.19.7 cl.20 under BPVOY4.
GE 94
 
Boston Globe Article
Boston Globe ArticleBoston Globe Article
Boston Globe Article
dfogel
 
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 5 Logistics
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 5 LogisticsCost Reduction Guide Issue 5 Logistics
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 5 Logistics
ymw15
 
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 5 Logistics
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 5 LogisticsCost Reduction Guide Issue 5 Logistics
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 5 Logistics
Chris Brown
 
Cost reduction guide - issue 5 logistics
Cost reduction guide - issue 5 logisticsCost reduction guide - issue 5 logistics
Cost reduction guide - issue 5 logistics
Manuel A. Velazquez
 
Freight Payment Benchmark Study 2013
Freight Payment Benchmark Study 2013Freight Payment Benchmark Study 2013
Freight Payment Benchmark Study 2013
dominic_mcgough
 
Case Study LLS
Case Study LLSCase Study LLS
Case Study LLS
Lynn Drake
 

Similar to Oceanfreight (20)

Upsc carrier research liability whitepaper
Upsc carrier research liability whitepaperUpsc carrier research liability whitepaper
Upsc carrier research liability whitepaper
 
Crowley petroleum-services-case-study
Crowley petroleum-services-case-studyCrowley petroleum-services-case-study
Crowley petroleum-services-case-study
 
What is the Cost of Tendering for a Shipper?
What is the Cost of Tendering for a Shipper?What is the Cost of Tendering for a Shipper?
What is the Cost of Tendering for a Shipper?
 
Freight Payment Benchmark Study March 2013
Freight Payment Benchmark Study March 2013Freight Payment Benchmark Study March 2013
Freight Payment Benchmark Study March 2013
 
Recovering from Reform4
Recovering from Reform4Recovering from Reform4
Recovering from Reform4
 
Economic Analysis in Merger Investigations – Break-out Session 3 – The role o...
Economic Analysis in Merger Investigations – Break-out Session 3 – The role o...Economic Analysis in Merger Investigations – Break-out Session 3 – The role o...
Economic Analysis in Merger Investigations – Break-out Session 3 – The role o...
 
Dangerous Goods Report, Volume 10—The Total Value of Compliance
Dangerous Goods Report, Volume 10—The Total Value of ComplianceDangerous Goods Report, Volume 10—The Total Value of Compliance
Dangerous Goods Report, Volume 10—The Total Value of Compliance
 
Risks of non compliance of cl.19.7 cl.20 under BPVOY4.
Risks of non compliance of cl.19.7 cl.20 under BPVOY4.Risks of non compliance of cl.19.7 cl.20 under BPVOY4.
Risks of non compliance of cl.19.7 cl.20 under BPVOY4.
 
Boston Globe Article
Boston Globe ArticleBoston Globe Article
Boston Globe Article
 
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 5 Logistics
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 5 LogisticsCost Reduction Guide Issue 5 Logistics
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 5 Logistics
 
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 5 Logistics
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 5 LogisticsCost Reduction Guide Issue 5 Logistics
Cost Reduction Guide Issue 5 Logistics
 
Cost reduction guide - issue 5 logistics
Cost reduction guide - issue 5 logisticsCost reduction guide - issue 5 logistics
Cost reduction guide - issue 5 logistics
 
Saving Your Brokerage Business
Saving Your Brokerage BusinessSaving Your Brokerage Business
Saving Your Brokerage Business
 
Freight Payment Benchmark Study 2013
Freight Payment Benchmark Study 2013Freight Payment Benchmark Study 2013
Freight Payment Benchmark Study 2013
 
Global Payables, Best Practices For Ecommerce Merchants By Dana Nino
Global Payables, Best Practices For Ecommerce Merchants By Dana NinoGlobal Payables, Best Practices For Ecommerce Merchants By Dana Nino
Global Payables, Best Practices For Ecommerce Merchants By Dana Nino
 
2015 Q3 QReview-Email Version
2015 Q3 QReview-Email Version2015 Q3 QReview-Email Version
2015 Q3 QReview-Email Version
 
PR NOV 11 P28­29 ­ Managing the risk
PR NOV 11 P28­29 ­ Managing the riskPR NOV 11 P28­29 ­ Managing the risk
PR NOV 11 P28­29 ­ Managing the risk
 
Case Study LLS
Case Study LLSCase Study LLS
Case Study LLS
 
clearing and forwarding summary
clearing and forwarding summary clearing and forwarding summary
clearing and forwarding summary
 
Shipping Note Spring 2012 (1)
Shipping Note  Spring 2012 (1)Shipping Note  Spring 2012 (1)
Shipping Note Spring 2012 (1)
 

Oceanfreight

  • 1. Canadian carriers Open-skies deal Coalition forges Special Reports: West Coast Ports; contest US fees no boon for cargo PNW security network Transportation Intermediaries VOLUME 8, ISSUE 14 APRIL 9, 2007 WWW.JOC.COM $5.00 The weekly newsmagazine of international trade and logistics, founded in 1827 Intermodal overhaul Maersk changes the way it moves containers in North America
  • 2. CONTAINER SHIPPING A dollar here, a dollar BY PETER T. LEACH there W ith big-box retailers The money involved in erroneous paying ocean freight billing for any one shipment may not bills that add up to be much, but multiply an incorrect millions of dollars a billing by the thousands of contain- errors in their own accounting sys- year, they often find it hard to track ers that may have been billed wrong tems that may save them additional whether their carriers have fulfilled and that can add up to real money. money on future shipments. the contracted freight rate for every That’s why a number of retailers are “Sometimes a carrier contract container they deliver. Their carriers turning to a company called Ocean has been signed and the cargo has may not have recorded the pickup or Freight Refunds Inc., which per- been received on such and such a delivery of a box on the correct date, forms post-shipment audits for date, but it doesn’t get through all or may have billed the shipper at the importers before their three-year the systems, so you might get wrong rate. The billing errors can statute of limitations on contract charged $75 more or $75 less,” said result from fluctuating freight rates, claims runs out. They are getting Ray Burdgett, director of interna- changes in surcharges or mistakes in significant amounts of money back tional transportation at Pier 1 inputting on both the carrier and from their carriers, and they are Imports in Fort Worth. “The biggest shipper sides. using the audits to find and fix thing we found is in mistakes in tim- Costs from erroneous billing can add up quickly for shippers. Here’s a way they can fix it.
  • 3. CONTAINER SHIPPING ing and rate changes that weren’t fixed fee is refunded in full, Land Service Inc., has started to reflected in the system or billed Ferreira said. audit ocean freight shipments. He properly.” He said one of the five biggest sold the first one, Tradechek, to an Pier 1 contracted with Ocean U.S. retailers has just signed a con- accounting firm in 1997. He started Freight Refunds to audit its ocean tract under the new pricing struc- Ocean Freight Refunds in 2004, shipments for 2003, 2004 and 2005. ture. Ferreira prefers the second after his non-compete period ended. “We did get back a substantial pricing model for his business The new company has already land- amount of money,” Burdgett said. because he would rather collect the ed contracts for audit services with “The biggest thing we found is in fixed fee upfront than wait the 15 of the top 100 U.S. importers mistakes in timing and rate changes three or four months to collect half ranked by PIERS Global Intel- that weren’t reflected on the system of the amount carriers refund to ligence Solutions, a sister company or billed properly.” his customers. of The Journal of Commerce. In Burdgett said the audit also Ocean Freight Refunds uses addition to Pier 1 Imports, some of showed Pier 1’s carriers where they proprietary software to match its the company’s customers include had made mistakes. “It was also dif- customers’ shipment records and Hasbro, Big Lots, J.C. Penney and ficult on our steamship partners contract rates against the invoices TJX, the parent of TJ Maxx. ◆ because they don’t like to give submitted by the carriers to spot money back,” he said. “They didn’t any anomalies in the pricing and Peter Leach can be contacted at know either. It’s not like they were delivery dates. pleach@joc.com. hiding something from us. Unless “We code their historic invoices, Readers of the digital edition of The Journal of somebody finds those mistakes, which gives us an idea of what the Commerce who want more information can click on: they’ll go forever and no one will rates should have been at any point www.oceanfreightrefunds.com To receive the JoC digital edition, ever find them.” in time,” Ferreira said. The software call (888) 215-6084. He said that although Pier 1’s catches about 80 percent of the system for tracking ocean shipments anomalies and errors, and human and bills was “doing a pretty good scrutiny catches the rest. Because job, the audit pointed out the areas every company uses different sys- we have problems with that we were tems, the audit must be customized able to go in and fix.” Now that for every client. “It’s a very simple Pier 1 has fixed its own auditing sys- process, but it has to be cus- tem, it does not plan to use Ocean tomized for every client, Freight Refunds’ audit system again. Ferreira said. “J.C. Penney “That’s one of the benefits I give and TJX have very differ- the clients,” said Steve Ferreira, ent processes.” founder and owner of Ocean Ocean Freight Freight Refunds. “I tell them that Refunds is the sec- they can take all the reports I gener- ond company that ate for them, and they can either use Ferreira, an alum- me going forward every six or 12 nus of Sea- months, or they can use the reports to fix their own system.” Ferreira offers customers two pricing models. Under the one he has been using for the past three years, clients pay a contingency fee of 50 percent of the amount of the refunds the audit helps them recov- er from their carriers. Under the new pricing model he introduced recently, his customers pay a fixed fee upfront for a guaranteed amount of refunds. If the refunds gained through the company’s audit don’t add up to the amount guaranteed, then the Reprinted from The Journal of Commerce, April 9, 2007 • www.joc.com ©Copyright 2007 The Journal of Commerce. All rights reserved Published with copyright permission from The Journal of Commerce. http://www.joc.com/copyrights – 4//07