2. Old Quality vs. New Quality
Difference between old quality (Rolls Royce, personal
banker, ...) and new quality is that old was the work of
craftsmen and the new is the work of a system (Toyota,
Big Mac, Boeing Aircraft, Disney World, ...). The old is
expensive, made for the few, using skilled hands, is
beautiful and functionally based. The new reduces cost,
made for the many by intelligent minds and should drive
the economy and make business more competitive.
Toyota Commercial
3. Why care about quality
increase productivity
expand market share
raise customer loyalty
enhance competitiveness of the firm
at a minimum, serve as a price of entry
4. Service Industries are particularly
Difficult
Reasons:
High volume of transaction
Immediate consumption
Difficult to measure and control
More labor intensive
High degree of customization required
Image is a quality characteristic
Behavior is a quality characteristic
5. Deming’s “Seven
Deadly Diseases”
Lack of Constancy of purpose
Emphasis on short term profits
Evaluation of performance, merit rating or annual review of
performance
Mobility of management
Running the company on visible figures alone
Excessive medical costs
Excessive costs of warranty fueled by lawyers that work on
contingency fees
Interview with Deming
6. What is TQM??
The essence of Total Quality Management is a common sense
dedication to understanding what the customer wants and then
using people and science to set up systems to deliver products
and services that delight the customer.
Greg Hughes
President
AT&T Transmission Systems
7. Basic Concepts of TQM
Customer Focus
Continuous Process Improvement - Kaizen
Employee Empowerment – Everyone is responsible for quality
Quality is free - focus on defect prevention rather than defect
detection for it is always cheaper to do it right the first time
Benchmarking – Legally stealing other people’s ideas
Customer-Supplier Partnerships
Management by fact..by numbers..by data – Balanced scoreboard
(financial, customer, process, learning)
8. Quality in U.S. vs. the Japanese
U.S. conforming to the requirements at the least
cost
Japanese joint responsibility to make the end
customer happy
8
9. “ I met the requirements”
m e nt
i re
Requ
OEM u cts
Pr od lts
r
o tR e su
T es
Supplier
OEM
Combative non collaborative relationship
9
10. “Creating the Best Vehicle/Systems with All the People
All the Suppliers All the Time”
YOU meet the
requirements! Let’s create
the best
Vehicle and
Systems
SOR together.
Partnership - Collaborative relationship
10
11. Strength of USA vs. Japan
Concept
Good Innovative Ideas Good Implementation
Strength of USA Mfg Strength of Japanese Mfg
KAIZEN
Time
Good Ideas, Good Implementation are the goals of
everyone in the automotive industry
11
12. Seven Basic Quality Tools To improve
Process Quality
Scatter Diagrams: Plot data on a chart – no attempt is made to
classify the data or massage it
Pareto Charts: Organize data on a histogram based on
frequency from most prevalent to least. Help identify major
causes or occurrences (80:20 rule)
Check Sheets: Easy way to count frequency of occurrence by
front line workers
Histograms: Categorize data is cells and plot (see if any patterns
emerge)
Run Charts: Plot data as a function of time
Cause and effects Charts: fishbone diagrams are used to identify
the root causes of a problem
Control Charts: are statistical tools used to determine if the
variation in results is caused by common or special events
13. Summary - Concepts
Quality all the time by everyone from an end user prospective
Address issues up stream. Address product and process defects
at the design stage
Fixing problems usually involves fixing the systemic process
issues that caused the problem – Reoccurrence Prevention
Focus on Implementation
Focus on Change Points and Interfaces
Editor's Notes
This brings us back to the main title of this presentation. Creating best vehicles by all the people, all the time. Not like the picture on the left, but like the one on the right.
Strength of USA is before process of execution and strength of Japanese is after process of execution