Call Girls Rishikesh Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Evaluation of anti infective drugs updated
1. Evaluation of anti-infective drugs
Chemotherapy & immunopharmacology
By - Markos Tadele
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
2. Introduction
• The drug development process starts with the
synthesis of novel chemical compounds
• Substances with complex structures may be
obtained from various sources
– Plants (cardiac glycosides)
– animal tissues (heparin)
– microbial cultures (penicillin G)
– Cultures of human cells (urokinase), or by
means of gene technology (human insulin)
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
3. Parameters need to be addressed for drug evaluation
• To decide for which kind of clinical infection the
antibacterial drug product should be use, the
following information should be developed from
in vitro studies
animal models of infection
(PK/PD) information from animal and
human studies and clinical trials
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
4. I. In vitro anti infective activity evaluation
General considerations for in vitro and in vivo
tests
• The goal should be to learn about a drug
product’s antibacterial activity in vitro and in
animal models of infection
• Tests are recommended to be done in three
replication
• QC parameters for in vitro susceptibility tests
antimicrobials of certified potency in
accordance with standardized procedures
(CLSI)
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
5. Development of QC Parameters for In Vitro
Susceptibility Testing
• should be established before determining the
activity of the antibacterial drug product
• to ensure the generation of precise, accurate,
and reproducible results
• If susceptibility information provided without
proper quality monitoring, the test procedure
and test results may be considered invalid.
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
6. Anti infective activity Information required
A) Antibacterial Spectrum of Activity
• Which type of organisms are affected?
genotypes, serotypes, biotypes, isolates
• known mechanisms of resistance should be
identified
• internationally approved antibacterial drug
products, especially those with the same
mechanism of action as the new drug should
be used
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
7. B. Mechanism of Action
• chemical structure and a description of any
structural or biological similarities to known
antibacterial drug products
• mechanism of action (e.g., inhibition of cell wall
synthesis, lysis of cell membrane, protein
synthesis, and inhibition of DNA or RNA
replication) should be demonstrated
• helps to understand development of resistance/
if occur lately
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
8. C. Intracellular Antimicrobial Concentration
Assessment
• The ability of an antibacterial drug product to
achieve significant intracellular concentrations
may have clinical importance
• when the target organism can reside within the
cell (e.g., Listeria, Chlamydophila, Legionella)
and phagocytosed pathogens
• Ex vivo studies may be suitable for this kinds
of study
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
9. E. Minimum inhibitory concentration/ MIC
• The MIC is the lowest concentration of
antimicrobial agent that completely inhibits
growth of the organism in tubes or micro-
dilution
• reported as the concentration of drug necessary
to inhibit 50% of strains (MIC50) , 90% of strains
(MIC90)
• Since growth and death of Mos are multifactoral
the conditions of the medium and the incubation
requirements must be standardized
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
10. D. Mechanism of Resistance Studies
• Resistance mechanisms may limit the
effectiveness of an antibacterial drug product in
clinical settings
– Mechanisms include alterations of the drug
product by production of enzymes (e.g., β-
lactamases, mutation)
– inability to reach the target
– changes in the affinity of the antibacterial
for the target site
– Drug transporting proteins etc…
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
11. F. Minimum lethal concentration/ MLC
• The bactericidal endpoint (MBC) at which 99.9%
of the final inoculum is killed
• (MBC) or (MFC), also known as the minimum
lethal concentration (MLC)
• MFC is also defined as the lowest concentration
of the drug that yields 98% – 99.9% killing
effect as compared to the initial inoculum
• Can be expressed like MIC, MBC90, MBC98,
MBC99
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
12. G. Immunotoxicology Evaluation of New Drugs
Five adverse event categories should be evaluated
1. Immunosuppression: Effects on the immune
system that result in decreased immune function
2. Immunogenicity: Immune reactions elicited by a
drug and/or its metabolites
3. Hypersensitivity: Immunological sensitization
due to a drug and/or its metabolites
4. Autoimmunity: Immune reactions to self-
antigens
5. Adverse Immunostimulation: Activation of
immune system effector mechanisms
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
13. H. Anti infective drug Interactions and Fixed
Combination Studies
• Drug interaction studies of antibacterial drug
products may provide information (e.g.,
synergy, antagonism, indifference)
• methods can include
– checkerboard titration analyzed by fractional
inhibitory concentration and
– kill curves
• These drug interactions are particularly
important for fixed combination drug products
(e.g., ß-lactam and ßlactamase inhibitor
combination)
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
14. drug Interactions….
• Drug interactions also can reflect the additive
nature of the pharmacodynamic effect of either
drug when taken with the other drug
Concomitant medications
dietary supplements
some foods, such as grapefruit juice, may alter
metabolism and/or
drug transport abruptly in individuals who
previously had been receiving and tolerating a
particular dose of a drug
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
15. I. Post-Antibiotic Effect (PAE)
• PAE measures the time to reach normal
logarithmic growth – log10
• The standard equation for PAE is:
PAE (hours) = T – C
• T = is the time required for the count of cfu to
increase 1 log10 (10-fold) above the count immediately
seen after drug treatment
• C = is the time required for the count to increase 1
log10 in an untreated control cultureMarkos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
16. Post-Antibiotic Effect (PAE)
1
10
100
1000
10000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Time (hours)
Removal of
Antibiotic
ViableCount(cfu/ml)
Control
1.6 hours to increase 1 log10
1 log10 increase
3.1 hours to increase 1 log10
Antibiotic
Induced death
PAE = 3.1 - 1.6 = 1.5 hours
Due to antibiotic effect only
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
17. Post-Antibiotic Effect
• Precise mechanism is still not understood
• Examples of PAE
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
18. J. Other Effects of Antibacterial Drug Product
• post antibiotic leukocyte effect
• sub-MIC effects
• effects on endotoxin
• effects on virulence factors and
• interactions with the host immune
system.
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
19. II. Animal Therapeutic and Pharmacological
Studies
Why animals used in research
• in vitro activity of antibacterial drug products
may not translate into significant activity in
vivo
• Animal models of human disease can be
studied in induced animals
– provide potential efficacy and safety of
antibacterial drug products in humans.
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
20. Why animals used in research
• The basic cell processes are the same in all
animals, and they perform similar vital
functions
• Simple animals can be used to study complex
biological systems
• will mimic the infection of interest and the
pharmacokinetics of the drug product in
humans
• what happens in the body following treatment
with certain drugs (ADME)
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
21. Animals mostly used in research
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
22. Mammals in in researches
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
23. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RATS AND MICE
• The rat is much larger in size and has greater
body weight as compared to the mouse.
• The mouse has a pointed face when compared
to the rat
• The rat has a thick and heavy tail. On the
other hand, a mouse has a very thin tail
• The rat has a higher pair of chromosomes, ie
22 pairs. On the contrary, the mouse has only a
20 pairs
• The rats have a longer gestation period
compared with the mice.
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
24. Animal experiment
• should at a minimum obtain information on:
– the natural history of the disease or
condition in humans and animals (is it the
same?)
– the etiologic agent and
– the proposed intervention (can work on
both?)
• Results can be reported as (ED50), (PD50),
(CD50)
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
25. III. Human Pharmacological Studies and Clinical
Trials
Steps to indicate the effectiveness and toxicity of
the agent
– investigation in vitro
– study effects in laboratory animals (studies
in cell culture- antivirals)
• The in vitro studies and the in vivo studies in
animals lead to investigational studies in man
• 4 phases
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
26. Clinical Study: Phase 1 (Human Pharmacology)
• Normal subjects; occasionally use patients (eg.
Hypertensive patients, highly toxic drugs)
• See if/how pharmacokinetics data from animal
studies extrapolates to human data
• Usually open label with ascending doses;
establish dose-range
• Build safety profile: monitor adverse effects
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
27. Studies conducted in Phase I typically involve one or
a combination of the following aspects:
a) Estimation of Initial Safety and Tolerability
dose range expected to be needed for later
clinical studies and to determine the nature of
adverse reactions
b) Pharmacokinetics
c) Assessment of Pharmacodynamics
For PK/PD studies may be conducted to estimate
dosage regimen and doses
d) Early Measurement of Drug Activity
Preliminary studies of activity or potential
therapeutic benefit
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
28. Phase II (Therapeutic Exploratory)
• In Phase II primary objective is to explore
therapeutic efficacy in patients
• patients who are selected by relatively narrow
criteria (relatively homogeneous)
• An important goal for this phase is to
determine the dose(s) and regimen for Phase
III trials.
• Confirm dose range is similar in such people; if
not, re-define range
• Blinding, randomization, controls used
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
29. Phase III (Therapeutic Confirmatory)
• primary objective is to demonstrate, or confirm
therapeutic benefit safety and efficacy profiles
claimed in Phase II
• Conducted on intended users, May have slightly
broader entry criteria - age, severity of disease
• Conducted between efficacy of the medicine is
demonstrated and New Drug Application (NDA)
• intended to provide an adequate basis for
marketing approval.
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
30. Phase III (Therapeutic Confirmatory)
Phase III may also further explore
– the dose-response relationship
– explore the drug's use in wider populations
– Drug performance in different stages of
disease
– combination effect with another drug (For
drugs intended to be administered for long
periods)
– trials involving extended exposure to the
drug are ordinarily conducted in Phase III,
although they may be started in Phase II
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
31. Phase IV (Therapeutic Use/PM surveilance)
• Phase IV begins after drug approval
• Therapeutic use studies go beyond the prior
demonstration, provide additional details about
the medicine's efficacy or safety profile
• New age groups, races, and other types of
patients can be studied
• previously unknown or inadequately quantified
adverse reactions and related risk factors are
an important aspect of many Phase IV studies
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
34. Subjects used in clinical studies
• Overall investigation Plan
– Phase 1 - Normal subjects: usually < 50
subjects, at one facility, safety parameters
– Phase 2 - Patients: about 50 - 100 subjects;
at two sites; may do some dose-range
assessment; safety and some initial efficacy
– Phase 3 - Patients: few hundred to several
thousand; multiple sites; main support
study
– Phase 4 - Patients (post-marketing): varies
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
36. References
• CLSI, 2009, Development of In Vitro Testing Criteria and
Quality Control Parameters; Approved Standard, CLSI
document M23-A3.
• CLSI, 2007, Methods for Antimicrobial Testing of Anaerobic
Bacteria; Approved Standard, CLSI document M11-A7.
• Background and History of Animal Testing Author: Ian
Murnaghan B.Sc (hons), M.Sc - Updated: 28 April 2015
• www.aboutanimaltesting.co.uk
• Spilker, Bert. Guide to Clinical Trials, Raven Press, 1984.
• Luellman, color atlas of pharmacology, 2005
• FDA, 2009, Microbiological Data for Systemic Antibacterial
Drug Products — Development, Analysis, and Presentation
Markos Tadele: evaluation of anti infective
drugs
Editor's Notes
The basic cell processes are the same in all animals, and they perform similar vital functions such as breathing, digestion, movement, sight, hearing and reproduction
Simple animals can be used to study complex biological systems such as the nervous or immune systems, which follow the same basic organization and function in all animals.
Results can be reported as 50 percent effective dose (ED50), 50 percent protective dose (PD50), or 50 percent curative dose (CD50)
pharmacodynamic studies and studies relating drug blood levels to response (PK/PD studies) may be conducted to estimate dosage regimen and doses