READ BELOW! Case Study #2:  Alleged improper admission orders resulting in morphine overdose and death There were multiple co-defendants in this claim who are not discussed in this scenario. Monetary amounts represent only the payments made on behalf of the nurse practitioner. Any amounts paid on behalf of the co-defendants are not available. While there may have been errors/negligent acts on the part of other defendants, the case, comments, and recommendations are limited to the actions of the defendant; the nurse practitioner. The decedent patient (plaintiff) was a 72 year old woman who had been receiving hospital care for acute back pain resulting from a fall. Her past history included chronic pain management and end-stage renal disease for which she received hemodialysis. She was to be transferred to the co-defendant nursing facility for reconditioning and physical therapy prior to returning to her home. The nurse practitioner (defendant) was on-call at the time of the patient’s transfer, and the nursing facility contacted her and read the orders to the defendant nurse practitioner over the telephone. The defendant nurse practitioner questioned the presence of two morphine orders for different dosages with both dosages administered twice daily. She instructed the nurse to clarify the correct morphine dosage with the transferring hospital’s pharmacist and to admit the patient only after the pharmacist clarified and approved the morphine orders. The defendant nurse practitioner had no further communication with the facility and no other involvement in the patient’s care. The facility nurse telephoned the hospital pharmacist who approved both morphine orders, and the patient was admitted to the nursing facility. During the first evening and full day of her nursing facility stay, documentation revealed the patient to be alert and oriented. On the second day, she was found by nursing staff without vital signs. Despite immediate chest compressions and EMS additional resuscitation measures, the patient was pronounced dead. The autopsy results listed the cause of death as morphine intoxication. Surprisingly, the patient also had an elevated blood alcohol level (equal to drinking three to four alcoholic beverages). Because the source of the alcohol could not be identified, the medical examiner was unable to rule out accident, suicide or homicide and classified the manner of death as undetermined. Resolution Defense experts presented testimony that the nurse practitioner’s actions to be within the standard of care. Defense experts testimony was that the patient’s final morphine blood levels, even considering her renal disease, could not have resulted from the amount of morphine ordered, administered and recorded in the patient’s health information record. The elevated morphine and alcohol levels led experts to the opinion that the patient may have ingested morphine and alcohol from a source other than the nursing facility. Plaintiff.

1. READ BELOW!
Case Study #2:
Alleged improper admission orders resulting in morphine
overdose and death
There were multiple co-defendants in this claim who are not
discussed in this scenario. Monetary amounts represent only the
payments made on behalf of the nurse practitioner. Any amounts
paid on behalf of the co-defendants are not available. While
there may have been errors/negligent acts on the part of other
defendants, the case, comments, and recommendations are
limited to the actions of the defendant; the nurse practitioner.
The decedent patient (plaintiff) was a 72 year old woman who
had been receiving hospital care for acute back pain resulting
from a fall. Her past history included chronic pain management
and end-stage renal disease for which she received
hemodialysis. She was to be transferred to the co-defendant
nursing facility for reconditioning and physical therapy prior to
returning to her home.
The nurse practitioner (defendant) was on-call at the time of the
patient’s transfer, and the nursing facility contacted her and
read the orders to the defendant nurse practitioner over the
telephone. The defendant nurse practitioner questioned the
presence of two morphine orders for different dosages with both
dosages administered twice daily. She instructed the nurse to
clarify the correct morphine dosage with the transferring
hospital’s pharmacist and to admit the patient only after the
pharmacist clarified and approved the morphine orders. The
defendant nurse practitioner had no further communication with
the facility and no other involvement in the patient’s care. The
facility nurse telephoned the hospital pharmacist who approved
both morphine orders, and the patient was admitted to the

2. nursing facility.
During the first evening and full day of her nursing facility
stay, documentation revealed the patient to be alert and
oriented. On the second day, she was found by nursing staff
without vital signs. Despite immediate chest compressions and
EMS additional resuscitation measures, the patient was
pronounced dead. The autopsy results listed the cause of death
as morphine intoxication. Surprisingly, the patient also had an
elevated blood alcohol level (equal to drinking three to four
alcoholic beverages). Because the source of the alcohol could
not be identified, the medical examiner was unable to rule out
accident, suicide or homicide and classified the manner of death
as undetermined.
Resolution
Defense experts
presented testimony that
the nurse practitioner’s actions to be within the standard of
care.
Defense experts
testimony was
that the patient’s final morphine blood levels, even considering
her renal disease, could not have resulted from the amount of
morphine ordered, administered and recorded in the patient’s
health information record. The elevated morphine and alcohol
levels led experts to the opinion that the patient may have
ingested morphine and alcohol from a source other than the
nursing facility.
Plaintiffs did not present any experts to contradict defense
experts.
A motion for partial summary judgment for the defendant nurse
practitioner was denied by the court and the decision was made

3. to proceed to trial. After the completion of testimony but prior
to receiving the verdict the co-defendants settled the case out of
court with no
individual
liability attributed to the defendant nurse practitioner.
Discussion
1.
Summarize the case and the
outcome of the case
.
2.
Based on your review;
What does Summary Judgment mean? Do you agree with the
court’s decision on the Summary Judgment? Why?
3.
Do you agree with the out of court settlement and no liability to
Nurse Practitioner?
Defend/discuss your answer.
4.
What practice-related legal and/or ethical issues were breached
and by whom? What other defendants [personnel] may be
responsible? How?
5.
Identify a risk management
action plan
to prevent this issue(s) from reoccurring.
ALL REQUIRMENTS MUST BE MET!
This assignment involves your having to do research. You

4. cannot rely on your textbook. A risk management action plan
means you must do something [WHAT? HOW?]. You may want
to Research [how to develop] an action plan. Also if you list a
reference there should be an in-text citation, and YES I do
check references. Finally, be sure to
RE-STATE each question
. Good Luck and Happy Researching!
Remember This assignment requires research-NOT just personal
opinions!
Also RE-STATE EACH/EVERY QUESTION.
Pts.
Points Earned
Explanation
Question #1
Summarize the Case and the verdict.
Based on YOUR review and summation, do you agree with the
court’s decision?
Identify& define the legal points mentioned
.
DEFEND your answer WITH appropriate RESEARCH
.
20
20
Question #2
a.
What practice related legal and/or ethical issue(s) [as they
pertain to Health Care Management] were breached?
b.
Identify & define the legal/ethical issues by statute/law/rule/or

5. canon. (Just to say they are negligent or unethical is not
acceptable)
c.
How was the statue/law/rule/canon breached?
d.
By Whom? (Include
ALL
the possible defendants mentioned and/or not mentioned in the
Case)
DEFEND your answer WITH appropriate RESEARCH
.
50
40
Not all of the questions listed were addressed satisfactorily
Question #3
Identify
and
document a
risk management action plan
to prevent this issue from reoccurring.BE SPECIFIC and
remember the Who, What, When and How of any
Action Plan
[NOTE High Point Value]
.
60
45
See comments on corrected assignment.

6. Following of Directions: 10 Points are deducted if paper
1.
IS NOT in APA Format [includes but not limited to running
head, page numbered, etc.]
2.
Does not have the Minimum [3-4] scholarly references
with
in-text citations
3. Did
NOT
include cover and reference pages,
4. Did NOT re-state each question prior to answer
NOTE how Points may be lost for NOT FOLLOWING
DIRECTIONS!
Multiple Grammatical/spelling/punctuation errors –
GRADUATE WRITING
!
1-15 - 5 point reduction
Over 15 grammatical errors – 10 point reduction
20
20
TOTAL Possible Points
150
125