Quantitative Analysis Report: Crosstabulation & Correlation Assignment Instructions Overview You will take part in several data analysis assignments in which you will develop a report using tables and figures from the IBM SPSS ® output file of your results. Using the resources and readings provided, you will interpret these results and test the hypotheses and writeup these interpretations. Instructions · Copy and paste all tables and figures into a Word document and format the results in APA current edition .  · Interpret your results. · Final report should be formatted using APA current edition , and in a Word document. · 4-5 double-spaced pages of content in length (not counting the title page or references). This second assignment uses the 2018 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey ( Federal Employee Survey 2018. sav ).  1. Address the following research question using crosstabulations with the appropriate measure of association: RQ 1: Is there a significant relationship between the rewarding of creativity and innovation by employees and the employees’ length of service in the federal government? · H 0 1: There is no statistically significant relationship between the rewarding of creativity and innovation by employees and the employees’ length of service in the federal government. · H a 1: There is a statistically significant relationship between the rewarding of creativity and innovation by employees and the employees’ length of service in the federal government. 1. Open the data file.  2. Click on Analysis.  3. Click on Descriptives.  4. Click on Crosstabs.  5. Follow directions in Cronk and the provided resources. 2. Address the following research question using a Spearman rho correlation for ordinal variables: RQ 2: Is there a significant relationship between the level of satisfaction with the policies and practices of senior leaders and the overall quality of work done by the employee’s work unit? · H 0 2: There is no statistically significant relationship between the level of satisfaction with the policies and practices of senior leaders and the overall quality of work done by the employee’s work unit. · H a 2: There is a statistically significant relationship between the level of satisfaction with the policies and practices of senior leaders and the overall quality of work done by the employee’s work unit. Copy and paste all tables and interpret your results.  Text and tables in Word format (no rtf files or pdf) and APA current edition . General Instructions As doctoral students, your assignments are expected to follow the principles of high-quality scientific standards and promote knowledge and understanding in the field of public administration. You should apply a rigorous and critical assessment of a body of theory and empirical research, articulating what is known about the phenomenon and ways to advance research about the topic under review. Re ...

1. Quantitative
Analysis Report: Crosstabulation & Correlation Assignment
Instructions
Overview
You
will take part in several data analysis assignments in which you
will develop a
report using tables and figures from the IBM SPSS
®
output file of
your results. Using the resources and readings provided, you
will interpret
these results and test the hypotheses and writeup these
interpretations.
Instructions
·
Copy
and paste all tables and figures into a Word document and
format the results in
APA current edition

2. .
·
Interpret
your results.
·
Final
report should be formatted using
APA current edition
, and in a Word
document.
·
4-5
double-spaced pages of content in length (not counting the title
page or
references).
This
second assignment uses the 2018 Federal Employee Viewpoint
Survey (
Federal Employee Survey 2018. sav
).
1.
Address

3. the following research question using
crosstabulations
with the appropriate measure of association:
RQ 1: Is there a significant
relationship between the rewarding of creativity and innovation
by employees
and the employees’ length of service in the federal government?
·
H
0
1:
There is no statistically significant relationship between the
rewarding of
creativity and innovation by employees and the employees’
length of service in
the federal government.
·
H
a
1:
There is a statistically significant relationship between the
rewarding of
creativity and innovation by employees and the employees’
length of service in
the federal government.

4. 1.
Open
the data file.
2.
Click
on Analysis.
3.
Click
on Descriptives.
4.
Click
on Crosstabs.
5.
Follow
directions in Cronk and the provided resources.
2.
Address

5. the following research question using a
Spearman
rho correlation
for ordinal variables:
RQ 2: Is there a significant
relationship between the level of satisfaction with the policies
and practices
of senior leaders and the overall quality of work done by the
employee’s work
unit?
·
H
0
2:
There is no statistically significant relationship between the
level of
satisfaction with the policies and practices of senior leaders and
the overall
quality of work done by the employee’s work unit.
·
H
a
2:
There is a statistically significant relationship between the leve l
of
satisfaction with the policies and practices of senior leaders and
the overall
quality of work done by the employee’s work unit.

6. Copy and
paste all tables and interpret your results.
Text and tables in Word format (no rtf files or pdf) and
APA current
edition
.
General
Instructions
As
doctoral students, your assignments are expected to follow the
principles of
high-quality scientific standards and promote knowledge and
understanding in
the field of public administration. You should apply a rigorous
and critical
assessment of a body of theory and empirical research,
articulating what is
known about the phenomenon and ways to advance research
about the topic under
review. Research syntheses should identify significant
variables, a systematic
and reproducible search strategy, and a clear framework for
studies included in
the larger analysis.

7. Manuscripts
should not be written in first person (“I”). All material should
be 12-point,
Times New Roman type, double-spaced with margins of one
inch.
All
manuscripts should be clearly and concisely written, with
technical material
set off. Please do not use jargon, slang, idioms, colloquialisms,
or
bureaucratese. Use acronyms sparingly and spell them out the
first time you use
them. Please do not construct acronyms from phrases you repeat
frequently in
the text.
Structure
of Assignment Paper
1.
Use
the following structure for your research article:
Abstract, Introduction,
Literature Review/Theory, Methods, Results, Discussion,
and
Conclusion
.
Include a robust discussion section distinct from your

8. conclusion.
2.
Give
your article a
Title
that is both descriptive and inviting to
prospective readers. Your article title should appeal to both
scholars and
practitioners. Use a shortened version of the main idea of your
article in the
title.
3.
Your
Abstract
should inform readers what your article is about and its most
important findings. Readers, including scholars and
practitioners, should be
able to understand your topic, argument, and conclusions. Make
your abstract
straightforward and do not use technical language or jargon.

9. 4.
In
the
Lit Review/Theory
, cite only literature and theory pertinent to the
specific issue and not those that are of only tangential or
general
significance. When summarizing earlier works, avoid
nonessential details;
instead, emphasize pertinent findings, relevant methodological
issues, and
major conclusions. Citation of relevant earlier literature is a
sign of scholarly responsibility and it is
critical for the growth of a doctoral student in public
administration.
5.
Methods
: The Methods section “describes in
detail how the study was conducted, including conceptual and
operational
definitions of the variables used in the study. Different types of
studies will
rely on different methodologies; however, a complete
description of the methods
used enables the reader to evaluate the appropriateness of your
methods and the
reliability and the validity of your results” (
APA current edition
). Include a description of your sample size and
procedure, participants, how data collected, and research
design.

10. 6.
Results
include data analysis used, results
of the analysis including tables and figures.
7.
Discussion
section includes interpretations
from the analysis. How do your analyses relate to the results
found by scholars
in your lit review/theory section. In this section, evaluate and
interpret their
implications, especially with respect to your original
hypotheses.
8.
Provide
a distinct
Conclusion
that tells readers what you found, why it is
important, and what difference it will make for research and
practice. Ensure
you separate your discussion section from the conclusion of the
article.
Synthesize your article; do not summarize it. Show readers how
the pieces of

11. your article fit together. Answer the question “So what?” Why
is your article
significant, and how is it relevant?