How bad epistemology is killing us - deploying the abductive virtues of Peirce and Popper
religious fundamentalism, enlightenment fundamentalism, axiological epistemology, rationalistic religion, rationalistic morality, bad epistemology, fundamentalistic, epistemic hubris, epistemic humility, epistemic vice, syllogistic reasoning, common sense, aesthetic sensibilities, moral intuitions, voluntarism, agnosticism, atheism, ursula goodenough, terrence deacon, evolutionary epistemology, karl popper, charles sanders peirce, charles hartshorne, nonstrict identity, ontological vagueness, epistemic indeterminacy, human value-realization, bernard lonergan, transcendental imperatives, intellectual conversion, affective conversion, moral conversion, religious conversion, sociopolitical conversion, synergia, theurgy, theoria, mystagogy, science and religion dialogue, interreligious dialogue, formative spirituality, theological anthropology, philosophical theology, amos yong, pneumatological imagination, john sobert sylvest, johnboy sylvest, michael cavanaugh, biotheology, karl popper, john polkinghorne, mortimer adler, from biology to consciousness to morality, nancey murphy, subconscious abduction, abductive intuition, abductive instinct, abductive perception, inference to the best explanation, popperian falsification, hume's problem of induction, abductive virtue, criteria of good hypotheses, occam's razor, pragmatic maxim
