Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Optimizing start up activities to decrease your study timeline - Part 3

518 views

Published on

This presentation is part 3 in a 3 part series of presentations on optimizing the clinical start up activities.

Published in: Healthcare
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Optimizing start up activities to decrease your study timeline - Part 3

  1. 1. Optimizing Start-up Activities to Decrease Your Study Timeline Part 3: Prequalification
  2. 2. Areas of Focus • Part 3 - Prequalification
  3. 3. Decision-making process • Consider these personal examples: – Have you ever hired based on a CV and phone interview? – Have you bought a car without taking it for a test drive? – Have you bought a house from the information on www.realtor.com without an inspection? • Why select sites without a test drive?
  4. 4. Prequalification Agenda • Meet the Enrollment Drivers • Tour the Facilities • Consider the “Not So Hidden” Agenda • Trip Report
  5. 5. Meet with the Enrollment Drivers • What should you expect? – Typically 1 FTE = 4.3 studies1 – Study Coordinators report that one to six studies is manageable • Over 50% of the respondents were working on 7 or more studies2 – How long have they been at the site? • Staff turnover = lower patient adherence3 • If you can’t identify the Enrollment Driver, you may have identified a potential problem. 1- Neuer A. 2002. The rising tide of CRC workload and turnover. The CenterWatch Monthly; 9(8):1-5. 2 - Duane, C. 2007. Study Coordinators’ Perceptions of their work experiences. Monitor: 39-42. 3 – Harris Interactive. 2004. “Most Physicians Do Not Participate in Clinical Trials Because of Lack of Opportunity, Time, Personnel Support and Resources. Health Care News 4(9):1-8.
  6. 6. Meet with the Enrollment Drivers • The Study Coordinator and Appointment Scheduler – What is their time allocation to research? – 87% of sites surveyed were devoting 50% or less to research. 4 • What are their other commitments (research and clinical)? 4 – Graziosi A. 2010. Investigator Site Survey, Applied Clinical Trials Research Utilization 5-25% 67% 26-50% 20% 51-75% 8% >75% 5%
  7. 7. Tour the Facilities • Confirm the expected – Device Storage, study binders, sample freezers, technology, etc. • Check for the unexpected – Take the “Patient Tour” • Ask to experience the patient visits per the protocol • Are they located close to support services (imaging, labs, etc.) This provides a patient-centric perspective and useful data on the site and your protocol
  8. 8. The “Not So Hidden” Agenda • Get there early – How does the site welcome you? – How are patients treated? • Are they given attention? Viewed as a burden? – How does scheduling/follow-up occur? • Assess the intangibles of the facilities – Are the research coordinators at the facility? • How are potential patients identified? • How are they approached about the study? • How accessible is the Investigator for Coordinator or Monitor questions? – Is there designated monitoring space? – How will the source documents be provided for monitoring? • Confirm the data – Enrollment rate / Query rate for the indication
  9. 9. Trip Report • Ensure congruency between the study requirements and the prequalification visit outcomes • Discuss any red flags identified and their potential impact • Add sites with longer lead times or short-term resource constraints to the “contingency pool”
  10. 10. Prequalification Costs • Direct costs • Staff*= $960 • Travel**= $1500 • Total= $2460/visit • * - Staff costs assumes a CRA II ($60/hr salary and benefits) utilized for a one day visit and one day for administrative preparation (agenda / document preparation) and trip report completion. • **- Travel includes a 1 day visit with an overnight accommodation, meals, rental car, mileage and airport parking • Site Initiation costs= $30,0005 • By reducing the number of non-performing sites by 5%: 5- Li, G. 2010. Planning the Right Number of Investigative Sites for a Clinical Trial. Monitor: 54-58.
  11. 11. Optimizing Start-up Activities to Decrease Your Study Timeline For more information or to schedule a discussion, contact us at: info@emergentclinical.com

×