....
Laird Research - Economics
April 18, 2016
Where we are now . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Indicators for US Economy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Global Financial Markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
US Key Interest Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
US Inflation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
QE Taper Tracker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Exchange Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
US Banking Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
US Employment Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
US Business Activity Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
US Consumption Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
US Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Global Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Global Business Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Canadian Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
European Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Chinese Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Global Climate Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Where we are now
The Laird Report presents a selection of economic data from around
the world to help figure where we are today. It was originally designed
to be read on the train - 1 page per minute on my 30 minute morning
commute.
This is the time when the divergence between corporate profits and
how individuals are actually fairing becomes visible. In the US, corpo-
rate profits are clearly down year over year (see page 4). Given that
they were at historic highs thanks to larger than usual profit margins,
this is not particularly unusual (ie. it’s heading towards normalacy
rather than a collapse overall). On the other hand, inflation is low
(thanks oil!) and employment in the US is still strong. In a real sense,
this is more a game of catch-up as individuals have been significantly
trailing corporate profits.
One area this report is deficient is in tracking the service industry.
This report heavily focuses on asset prices, employment and manufac-
turing and only indirectly looks at services. This is a weakness because
services are accounting for the bulk of GDP in most countries. For
China this is a particular weakness in our understanding of their econ-
omy as manufacturing has slowed down but there is a countervailing
force of the Chinese government pushing for an improvement on their
service sector. (Note the layoffs in the past two months of millions of
miners etc, with the view that they will be retrained for the service
sector). Ultimately we are going to have to find a better way to track
this part of the economy.
Global trade is still down in this report. Again, from the reading
I’ve been doing, it seems that the service sector is taking up some of
the slack on this.
higher wages, more inflation, and higher profits.
Formatting Notes The grey bars on the various charts are OECD
recession indicators for the respective countries.
Subscription Info For a FREE subscription to this monthly re-
port, please visit sign up at our website: www.lairdresearch.com
Laird Research, April 18, 2016
Indicators for US Economy
Leading indicators are indicators that usually change before the
economy as a whole changes. They are useful as short-term predictors
of the economy. Our list includes the Philly Fed’s Leading Index which
summarizes multiple indicators; initial jobless claims and hours worked
(both decrease quickly when demand for employee services drops and
vice versa); purchasing manager indicies; trucking indices showing de-
mand for transport; new order and housing permit indicies and con-
sumer sentiment (how consumers are feeling about their own financial
situation and the economy in general). Red dots are points where a
new trend has started.
Leading Index for the US
Index:Est.6monthgrowth
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
−2−10123
median: 1.56
Feb 2016: 1.57
Growth
Contraction
Initial Unemployment Claims
1000'sofClaimsperWeek
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
0100300500700
median: 348.50
Apr 2016: 265.00
Manufacturing Ave. Weekly Hours Worked
HoursworkedperWeek
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
394041424344
median: 40.60
Mar 2016: 41.70
ISM Manfacturing − PMI
Index:SteadyState=50
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
3040506070
median: 53.30
Mar 2016: 51.80expanding economy
contracting economy
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 2
Leading indicators are indicators that usually change before the
economy as a whole changes. They are useful as short-term predictors
of the economy. Our list includes the Philly Fed’s Leading Index which
summarizes multiple indicators; initial jobless claims and hours worked
(both decrease quickly when demand for employee services drops and
vice versa); purchasing manager indicies; trucking indices showing de-
mand for transport; new order and housing permit indicies and con-
sumer sentiment (how consumers are feeling about their own financial
situation and the economy in general). Red dots are points where a
new trend has started.
Durable Goods: Manufacturers New Orders
BillionsofDollars
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
150200250300
median: 185.46
Feb 2016: 229.12
Index of Truck Tonnage
Index
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
100110120130
median: 113.05
Feb 2016: 135.80
Capex (ex. Defense & Planes)
BillionsofDollars
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
40506070
median: 57.99
Feb 2016: 66.97
U. Michigan: Consumer Sentiment
Index1966Q1=100
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
5060708090100110
median: 88.80
Mar 2016: 91.00
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 3
Global Financial Markets
Global Stock Market Returns
Country Index Name Close Date Current
Value
Weekly
Change
Monthly
Change
3 month
Change
12
month
Change
Corr to
S&P500
Corr to
TSX
North America
USA S&P 500 Apr 15 2,080.7 1.6% I 3.2% I 10.7% I -1.2% J 1.00 0.75
USA NASDAQ Composite Apr 15 4,938.2 1.8% I 4.4% I 10.0% I -1.5% J 0.96 0.67
USA Wilshire 5000 Total Market Apr 15 21,463.5 1.9% I 3.7% I 11.0% I -3.9% J 0.99 0.76
Canada S&P TSX Apr 15 13,637.2 1.8% I 1.8% I 13.0% I -11.7% J 0.75 1.00
Europe and Russia
France CAC 40 Apr 15 4,495.2 4.5% I 0.5% I 6.8% I -14.4% J 0.58 0.55
Germany DAX Apr 15 10,051.6 4.5% I 1.2% I 5.3% I -17.8% J 0.53 0.46
United Kingdom FTSE Apr 15 6,343.8 2.2% I 3.3% I 9.3% I -10.6% J 0.63 0.64
Russia Market Vectors Russia ETF Apr 15 16.8 2.0% I 7.7% I 35.6% I -15.3% J 0.63 0.73
Asia
Taiwan TSEC weighted index Apr 15 8,700.4 1.9% I 1.0% I 12.1% I -8.8% J 0.22 0.25
China Shanghai Composite Index Apr 15 3,078.1 3.1% I 7.5% I 6.1% I -24.6% J 0.18 0.15
Japan NIKKEI 225 Apr 15 16,848.0 6.5% I -1.6% J -1.7% J -15.2% J 0.05 0.09
Hong Kong Hang Seng Apr 15 21,316.5 4.6% I 5.1% I 9.2% I -22.8% J 0.27 0.33
Korea Kospi Apr 15 2,014.7 2.2% I 2.3% I 7.2% I -5.0% J 0.22 0.27
South Asia and Austrailia
India Bombay Stock Exchange Apr 13 25,626.8 2.9% I 3.3% I 3.1% I -11.8% J 0.40 0.41
Indonesia Jakarta Apr 15 4,823.6 -0.5% J -0.5% J 6.6% I -10.9% J 0.13 0.23
Malaysia FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Apr 15 1,728.0 0.6% I 2.2% I 6.1% I -6.1% J 0.31 0.29
Australia All Ordinaries Apr 15 5,224.1 4.1% I 1.1% I 5.6% I -11.1% J 0.13 0.28
New Zealand NZX 50 Index Gross Apr 15 6,844.7 1.7% I 4.1% I 11.0% I 16.9% I 0.09 0.11
South America
Brasil IBOVESPA Apr 15 53,228.0 5.8% I 12.9% I 38.0% I -3.1% J 0.39 0.49
Argentina MERVAL Buenos Aires Apr 15 13,237.9 8.3% I 9.6% I 32.1% I 9.1% I 0.49 0.55
Mexico Bolsa index Apr 15 45,536.5 1.5% I 3.0% I 11.5% I 0.6% I 0.70 0.64
MENA and Africa
Egypt Market Vectors Egypt ETF Apr 15 38.6 -0.5% J 6.8% I 20.7% I -28.2% J 0.42 0.50
(Gulf States) Market Vectors Gulf States ETF Apr 15 22.4 1.9% I 5.4% I 17.6% I -16.5% J 0.30 0.28
South Africa iShares MSCI South Africa Index Apr 15 54.3 5.7% I 14.0% I 38.9% I -20.2% J 0.68 0.67
(Africa) Market Vectors Africa ETF Apr 15 19.6 4.0% I 4.8% I 28.9% I -24.2% J 0.59 0.71
Commodities
USD Spot Oil West Texas Int. Apr 11 $40.5 18.0% I 5.1% I 28.8% I -22.1% J 0.42 0.62
USD Gold LME Spot Apr 15 $1,229.8 -0.4% J -0.3% J 13.7% I 3.4% I 0.01 0.02
Note: Correlations are based on daily arithmetic returns for the most recent 100 trading days.
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 4
S&P 500 Composite Index
The S&P 500 Composite Index is widely regarded as the best single
gauge of the large cap U.S. equities market. A key figure is the valua-
tion level of the S&P500 as measured by the Price/Earnings ratio. We
present two versions: (1) a 12-month trailing earnings version which
reflects current earnings but is skewed by short term variances and (2)
a cyclically adjusted version which looks at the inflation adjusted earn-
ings over a 10 year period (i.e. at least one business cycle). Forecasted
earnings numbers are estimates provided by S&P.
S&P 500 Profit Margins and Overall Corporate Profit Margins (Trailing 12 months)
Percent
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Percent
Total Corporate Profits (% of GDP) − median: 6.2%, Q4/15: 9.0%
Net Profit Margin (S&P 500 Earnings / Revenue) − median: 6.6%, Q4/15: 7.7%
S&P Quarterly Earnings (USD$ Inflation Adjusted to current prices)
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
−5.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
−5.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
Tech Bubble
Japanese Asset Bubble
House BubbleAsian Financial Crisis
US Financial Crisis
Eurozone crisis
Oil Crisis I Oil Crisis II
Gulf War
Savings and Loans Crisis
High Inflation Period
Afganistan/Iraq WarVietnam War
Reported Earnings
Operating Earnings
Trailing P/E Ratios for S&P500
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
Multiple
Multiple
12−month P/E ( median = 17.4, Apr = 22.7)
10−year CAPE ( median = 19.5, Apr = 25.6)
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 5
S&P 500 Composite Distributions
This is a view of the price performance of the S&P 500 index com-
panies. The area of each box is proportional to the company’s market
cap, while the colour is determined by the percentage change in price
over the past month. In addition, companies are sorted according to
their industry group.
AAPL
+9.3%
GOOG
+5.6%
MSFT
+5.8%
FB
−0.16%
V
+7.3%
ORCL
+8%
INTC
+3.6%
IBM
+13%
CSCO
+4.9%
MA
+7.3%
QCOM
ACN
TXN EMC
CRM
ADP
YHOO
HPE
EBAY
INTU
ATVI
AMAT
FISV
TEL
FIS
EQIX
EA
NVDA
ADI
CA
MU
BRK−B
+4.8%
WFC
−0.96%
JPM
+5.3%
BAC
+6.5%
C
+8.8%
USB
+3.7%
GS
+2.5%
SPG AIG
AXP
BLK
MS
MET
PSA
PNC BK
CB
SCHW
COF
TRV
PRU
CME
MMC
CCI
ICE
AFL
MHFI
GGP
AVB
HCN
SYF
STT
PLD
BEN
DFS
VTR
PGR
BXP
MTB
WY
O
IVZ
L
XL
FRT
SLG
LNC
JNJ
+2.8%
PFE
+8.2%
MRK
+9.4%
GILD
+10%
UNH
+5.1%
AMGN
+7.9%
BMY
MDT
+4.5%
AGN
−27%
ABBV
+5.6%
CELG
+2.2%
LLY
ABT
+10%
BIIB
TMO
+7.6%
ESRX
REGN
SYK
AET
MCK
CI BDX
HCA
CAH
BSX
ZTS
ZBH
EW
A WAT
AMZN
+8.1%
HD
+8%
DIS
+0.96%
CMCSA
+5.1%
MCD NKE SBUX
LOW PCLN
TWC
TWX FOX TJX
F TGT GM
CCL
YUM
ORLY
LB
DG JCI
CBS DLPH
OMC
DLTR
UA
GPC
MHK HOT
M
DHI
HBI
BBY SIG
FL
PG
+1.3%
WMT
+4.7%
KO
+6.3%
PM
+11%
PEP
+5.5%
MO
CVS
+4%
KHC WBA
RAI
COST MDLZ
CL
+5.8%
KMB
GIS KR
EL STZ
K
TSN
SYY
HSY CAG
DPS
CLX
GE
+3.8%
MMM
+5.8%
UPS
+7.3%
HON BA
UTX
LMT UNP
DHR FDX
CAT
GD
ITW
RTN
DAL NOC EMR
ETN
LUV
WM
NSC
CSX
DE
AAL
GLW
UAL
CMI
ROP
APH
RSG
IR
TYC
PH
VRSK
LLL
XOM
+4.5%
CVX
+13%
SLB
+3%
OXY COP
PSX EOG
KMI
HAL
VLO
PXD
SE
MPC
BHI
APA
HES
NBL
DUK NEE
SO D
AEP
EXC
PPL
PEG
EIX
ED
ES
DTE
FE
ETR
AEE
NI
DOW
DD
MON
LYB
ECL
PX
PPG
SHW
IP
NUE
VMC AA
FCX
BLL
IFF
CF
T
+2.9%
VZ
−0.21%
LVLT CTL
Information Technology Financials
Health Care
Consumer Discretionary
Consumer Staples
Industrials
Energy Utilities Materials
Telecommunications
Services
<−25.0% −20.0% −15.0% −10.0% −5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% >25.0%
% Change in Price from Mar 1, 2016 to Apr 15, 2016
Average Median Median Median
Sector Change P/Sales P/Book P/E
Energy 10.6% I 1.6 1.9 25.5
Materials 8.2% I 1.6 4.3 24.0
Utilities 7.1% I 2.0 2.0 22.0
Information Technology 6.1% I 3.5 4.3 24.8
Industrials 5.9% I 1.5 3.6 19.5
Average Median Median Median
Sector Change P/Sales P/Book P/E
Financials 5.4% I 2.6 1.6 16.5
Health Care 4.3% I 3.3 3.9 27.0
Consumer Discretionary 4.1% I 1.7 4.1 19.7
Consumer Staples 3.5% I 2.6 5.9 28.3
Telecommunications Services 1.8% I 1.6 1.9 14.4
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 6
US Equity Valuations
A key valuation metric is Tobin’s q: the ratio between the market
value of the entire US stock market versus US net assets at replacement
cost (ie. what you pay versus what you get). Warren Buffet famously
follows stock market value as a percentage of GNP, which is highly
(93%) correlated to Tobin’s q.
We can also take the reverse approach: assume the market has
valuations correct, we can determine the required returns of future es-
timated earnings. These are quoted for both debt (using BAA rated
securities as a proxy) and equity premiums above the risk free rate (10
year US Treasuries). These figures are alternate approaches to under-
standing the current market sentiment - higher premiums indicate a
demand for greater returns for the same price and show the level of
risk-aversion in the market.
Tobin's q (Market Equity / Market Net Worth) and S&P500 Price/Sales
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
Buying assets at a discount
Paying up for growth
Tobin Q (median = 0.76, Dec = 0.95)
S&P 500 Price/Sales (median = 1.35, Dec = 1.82)
Equity and Debt Risk Premiums: Spread vs. Risk Free Rate (10−year US Treasury)
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
Implied Equity Premium (median = 4.2%, Apr = 4.9%)
Debt (BAA) Premium (median = 2.0%, Apr = 3.0%)
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 7
US Mutual Fund Flows
Fund flows describe the net investments in equity and bond mutual
funds in the US market, as described in ICI’s “Trends in Mutual Fund
Investing” report. Note however that this is only part of the story as
it does not include ETF fund flows - part of the changes are investors
entering or leaving the market, and part is investors shifting to ETF’s
from mutual funds.
US Net New Investment Cash Flow to Mutual Funds
US$billions(monthly)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
−40−2002040
Domestic Equity
World Equity
Taxable Bonds
Municipal Bonds
US Net New Investment Cash Flow to Mutual Funds
US$billions(Monthly)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
−60−40−200204060
Flows to Equity
Flows to Bonds
Net Market Flows
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 8
US Key Interest Rates
Interest rates are often leading indicators of stress in the financial
system. The yield curve show the time structure of interest rates on
government bonds - Usually the longer the time the loan is outstanding,
the higher the rate charged. However if a recession is expected, then
the fed cuts rates and this relationship is inverted - leading to negative
spreads where short term rates are higher than long term rates.
Almost every recession in the past century has been preceeded by an
inversion - though not every inversion preceeds a recession (just most
of the time).
For corporate bonds, the key issue is the spread between bond rates
(i.e. AAA vs BAA bonds) or between government loans (LIBOR vs
Fedfunds - the infamous “TED Spread”). Here a spike correlates to an
aversion to risk, which is an indication that something bad is happen-
ing.
US Treasury Yield Curves
ForwardInstantaneousRates(%)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Apr 14, 2016 (Today)
Mar 14, 2016 (1 mo ago)
Jan 14, 2016 (3 mo ago)
14 Apr 2015 (1 yr ago)
3 Month & 10 Yr Treasury Yields
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%10 Yr Treasury
3 Mo Treasury
Spread
AAA vs. BAA Bond Spreads
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
Percent
AAA
BAA
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
median: 91.00
Apr 2016: 119.00
0
100
200
300
0
100
200
300
Spread(bps)
LIBOR vs. Fedfunds Rate
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
Percent
3 mos t−bill
LIBOR
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
median: 36.38
Apr 2016: 41.08
0
100
200
300
0
100
200
300
Spread(bps)
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 9
US Inflation
Generally, the US Fed tries to anchor long run inflation expectations
to approximately 2%. Inflation can be measured with the Consumer
Price Index (CPI) or the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE)
index.
In both cases, it makes sense to exclude items that vary quickly like
Food and Energy to get a clearer picture of inflation (usually called
Core Inflation). The Fed seems to think PCI more accurately reflects
the entire basket of goods and services that households purchase.
Finally, we can make a reasonable estimate of future inflation ex-
pectations by comparing real return and normal bonds to construct an
imputed forward inflation expectation. The 5y5y chart shows expected
5 year inflation rates at a point 5 years in the future. Neat trick that.
Consumer Price Index
Percent
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
−1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
−1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
US Inflation Rate YoY% (Mar = 0.87%)
US Inflation ex Food & Energy YoY% (Mar = 2.2%)
Personal Consumption Expenditures
Percent(YearoverYear)
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
−10123456
PCE Inflation Rate YoY% (Feb = 0.96%)
PCE Core Inflation YoY% (Feb = 1.7%)
5−Year, 5−Year Forward Inflation Expectation Rate
Percent
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
−10123456
5 year forward Inflation Expectation
Actual 5yr Inflation (CPI measure)
Actual 5yr Inflation (PCE Measure)
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 10
QE Taper Tracker
The US has been using the program of Quantitative Easing to pro-
vide monetary stimulous to its economy. The Fed has engaged in a
series of programs (QE1, QE2 & QE3) designed to drive down long
term rates and improve liquidity though purchases of treasuries, mor-
gage backed securites and other debt from banks.
The higher demand for long maturity securities would drive up their
price, but as these securities have a fixed coupon, their yield would be
decreased (yield ≈ coupon / price) thus driving down long term rates.
In 2011-2012, “Operation Twist” attempted to reduce rates without
increasing liquidity. They went back to QE in 2013.
The Fed chairman suggested in June 2013 the economy was recover-
ing enough that they could start slowing down purchases (“tapering”).
The Fed backed off after a brief market panic. The Fed announced in
Dec 2013 that it was starting the taper, a decision partly driven by
seeing key targets of inflation around 2% and unemployment being less
than 6.5%. In Oct 2014, they announced the end of purchases.
QE Asset Purchases to Date (Treasury & Mortgage Backed Securities)
Trillions
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
QE1 QE2 Operation Twist QE3 TaperTreasuries
Mortgage Backed Securities
Total Monthly Asset Purchases (Treasury + Mortgage Backed Securities)
Billions
−100
−50
0
50
100
150
200
−100
−50
0
50
100
150
200
Month to date Apr 13: $13.1
Inflation and Unemployment − Relative to Targets
Percent
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
2
4
6
8
10
Target Unemployment 6.5%
Target Inflation 2%
U.S. 10 Year and 3 Month Treasury Constant Maturity Yields
Percent
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
1
2
3
4
5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Short Term Rates:
Once at zero, Fed moved to QE
Long Term Rates:
Moving up in anticipation of Taper?
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 11
Exchange Rates
10 Week Moving Average CAD Exchange Rates
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
0.620.710.810.901.001.09
USA/CAD
0.550.610.660.720.770.82
Euro/CAD
59.1674.7190.26105.81121.36136.91
Japan/CAD
0.380.440.490.550.610.67
U.K./CAD
0.591.101.602.112.613.12
Brazil/CAD
CAD Appreciating
CAD Depreciating
Change in F/X: Mar 1 2016 to Apr 8 2016
(Trade Weighted Currency Index of USD Trading Partners)
−3.0%
−1.5%
1.5%
3.0%
Euro
−2.0%
UK
1.9%
Japan
−2.0%
South Korea
−3.7%
China
1.7%
India
1.1%
Brazil
−5.3%
Mexico
2.2%
Canada
−0.1%
USA
−2.9%
Country vs. Average
Appreciating
Depreciating
% Change over 3 months vs. Canada
<−10.0% −8.0% −6.0% −4.0% −2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% >10.0%
CAD depreciatingCAD appreciating
ARG
−16.8%
AUS
−0.8%
BRA
0.9%
CHN
−10.4%
IND
−9.8%
RUS
3.2%
USA
−11.8%
EUR
−8.8%
JPY
−4.8%
KRW
−8.3%
MXN
−8.3%
ZAR
1.6%
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 12
US Banking Indicators
The banking and finance industry is a key indicator of the health
of the US economy. It provides crucial liquidity to the economy in the
form of credit, and the breakdown of that system is one of the exac-
erbating factors of the 2008 recession. Key figures to track are the
Net Interest Margins which determine profitability (ie. the difference
between what a bank pays to depositors versus what the bank is paid
by creditors), along with levels of non-performing loans (i.e. loan loss
reserves and actual deliquency rates).
US Banks Net Interest Margin
Percent
3.03.54.04.5
median: 3.94
2015 Q4: 3.02
Repos Outstanding with Fed. Reserve
BillionsofDollars
0200400600
median: 58.38
Apr 2016: 258.54
Bank ROE − Assets between $300M−$1B
Percent
051015
median: 12.81
2015 Q4: 9.93
Consumer Credit Outstanding
%YearlyChange
−505101520
median: 7.52
Feb 2016: 6.61
Total Business Loans
%YearlyChange
−2001020 median: 8.62
Mar 2016: 10.41
US Nonperforming Loans
Percent
12345
median: 2.05
2015 Q4: 1.55
St. Louis Financial Stress Index
Index
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
0246
median: 0.089
Apr 2016: −0.81
Commercial Paper Outstanding
TrillionsofDollars
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1.01.41.82.2
median: 1.33
Apr 2016: 1.09
Residential Morgage Delinquency Rate
Percent
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
246810
median: 2.33
2015 Q4: 5.17
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 13
US Employment Indicators
Unemployment rates are considered the “single best indicator of
current labour conditions” by the Fed. The pace of payroll growth is
highly correlated with a number of economic indicators.Payroll changes
are another way to track the change in unemployment rate.
Unemployment only captures the percentage of people who are in
the labour market who don’t currently have a job - another measure
is what percentage of the whole population wants a job (employed or
not) - this is the Participation Rate.
The Beveridge Curve measures labour market efficiency by looking
at the relationship between job openings and the unemployment rate.
The curve slopes downward reflecting that higher rates of unemploy-
ment occur coincidentally with lower levels of job vacancies.
Unemployment Rate
Percent
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
median: 6.10
Mar 2016: 5.00
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Percent
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2.02.53.03.54.0
Beveridge Curve (Unemployment vs. Job Openings)
Unemployment Rate (%)
JobOpenings(%totalEmployment)
Dec 2000 − Dec 2008
Jan 2009 − Jan 2016
Feb 2016
Participation Rate
PercentofPop.
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
6364656667
median: 66.00
Mar 2016: 63.00
Total Nonfarm Payroll Change
MonthlyChange(000s)
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
−5000500
median: 168
Mar 2016: 215
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 14
There are a number of other ways to measure the health of employ-
ment. The U6 Rate includes people who are part time that want a
full-time job - they are employed but under-utilitized. Temporary help
demand is another indicator of labour market tightness or slack.
The large chart shows changes in private industry employment lev-
els over the past year, versus how well those job segments typically pay.
Lots of hiring in low paying jobs at the expense of higher paying jobs
is generally bad, though perhaps not unsurprising in a recovery.
Median Duration of Unemployment
Weeks
510152025
median: 8.70
Mar 2016: 11.40
(U6) Unemployed + PT + Marginally Attached
Percent
810121416
median: 9.80
Mar 2016: 9.80
4−week moving average of Initial Claims
Jan1995=100
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
050100150200
median: 107.15
Apr 2016: 81.48
Unemployed over 27 weeks
MillionsofPersons
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
01234567
median: 0.80
Mar 2016: 2.31
Services: Temp Help
MillionsofPersons
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1.52.02.53.0
median: 2.26
Mar 2016: 2.89
−200 0 200 400 600
15
20
25
30
35
40
Annual Change in Employment Levels (000s of Workers)
Averagewages($/hour)
Private Industry Employment Change (Mar 2015 − Mar 2016)
Construction
Durable Goods
Education
Financial Activities
Health Services
Information
Leisure and Hospitality
Manufacturing
Mining and Logging
Nondurable Goods
Other Services
Professional &
Business Services
Retail Trade
Transportation
Utilities
Wholesale Trade
Circle size relative to total employees in industry
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 15
US Business Activity Indicators
Business activity is split between manufacturing activity and non-
manufacturing activity. We are focusing on forward looking business
indicators like new order and inventory levels to give a sense of the
current business environment.
Manufacturing: Real Output
YoYPercentChange
−1001020
median: 8.70
Oct 2015: 6.93
ISM Manufacturing − PMI
3040506070
Mar 2016: 51.80
manufac. expanding
manufac. contracting
ISM Manufacturing: New Orders Index
304050607080
Mar 2016: 58.30
Increase in new orders
Decrease in new orders
Non−Manufac. New Orders: Capital Goods
BillionsofDollars
40506070
median: 57.99
Feb 2016: 66.97
Average Weekly Hours: Manufacturing
3940414243
median: 41.20
Mar 2016: 41.70
Industrial Production: Manufacturing
YoYPercentChange
−15−50510
median: 3.00
Mar 2016: 0.52
Inventory to Sales Ratio
Ratio
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1.11.21.31.41.51.6
median: 1.37
Feb 2016: 1.41
Chicago Fed: Sales, Orders & Inventory
Index
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
−0.50.00.5
Feb 2016: −0.03
Above ave growth
Below ave growth
ISM Non−Manufacturing Bus. Activity Index
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
35455565
Mar 2016: 59.80
Growth
Contraction
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 16
US Consumption Indicators
Variations in consumer activity are a leading indicator of the
strength of the economy. We track consumer sentiment (their expec-
tations about the future), consumer loan activity (indicator of new
purchase activity), and new orders and sales of consumer goods.
U. Michigan: Consumer Sentiment
Index1966Q1=100
5060708090110
median: 88.80
Mar 2016: 91.00
Consumer Loans (All banks)
YoY%Change
−10010203040
median: 7.50
Mar 2016: 7.87
Accounting
Change
Deliquency Rate on Consumer Loans
Percentage
2.03.04.0
median: 3.46
Oct 2015: 2.02
New Orders: Durable Consumer Goods
YoY%Change
−20020
median: 4.30
Feb 2016: 9.58
New Orders: Non−durable Consumer Goods
YoY%Change
−2001020
median: 4.17
Feb 2016: −9.92
Personal Consumption & Housing Index
Index
−0.40.00.20.4
median: 0.02
Feb 2016: −0.09above ave growth
below ave growth
Light Cars and Trucks Sales
MillionsofUnits
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
10121416182022
median: 14.84
Mar 2016: 16.46
Personal Saving Rate
Percent
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
246810
median: 5.50
Feb 2016: 5.40
Retail Food and Service Sales
YoY%Change(Real)
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
−10−505
median: 2.45
Mar 2016: 0.87
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 17
US Housing
Housing construction is only about 5-8% of the US economy, how-
ever a house is typically the largest asset owned by a household. Since
personal consumption is about 70% of the US economy and house val-
ues directly impact household wealth, housing is an important indicator
in the health of the overall economy. In particular, housing investment
was an important driver of the economy getting out of the last few
recessions (though not this one so far). Here we track housing prices
and especially indicators which show the current state of the housing
market.
15 20 25 30 35
150200250300
Personal Income vs. Housing Prices (Inflation adjusted values)
NewHomePrice(000's)
Disposable Income Per Capita (000's)
Feb 2016
r2
: 89.5%
Range: Jan 1959 − Feb 2016
Blue dots > +5% change in next year
Red dots < −5% change in next year
New Housing Units Permits Authorized
MillionsofUnits
0.51.01.52.02.5
median: 1.34
Feb 2016: 1.18
New Home Median Sale Price
SalePrice$000's
100150200250300
Feb 2016: 301.40
Homeowner's Equity Level
Percent
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
4050607080
median: 66.50
2015 Q4: 56.90
New Homes: Median Months on the Market
Months
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
468101214
median: 4.90
Feb 2016: 3.80
US Monthly Supply of Homes
MonthsSupply
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
4681012
median: 5.90
Feb 2016: 5.60
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 18
US Housing - FHFA Quarterly Index
The Federal Housing Finance Agency provides a quarterly survey
on house prices, based on sales prices and appraisal data. This gener-
ates a housing index for 355 municipal areas in the US from 1979 to
present. We have provided an alternative view of this data looking at
the change in prices from the peak in the 2007 time frame.
The goal is to provide a sense of where the housing markets are
weak versus strong.The colours represent gain or losses since the start
of the housing crisis (defined as the maximum price between 2007-2009
for each city). The circled dots are the cities in the survey, while the
background colours are interpolated from these points using a loess
smoother.
Change from 2007 Peak − Q4 2015
−50%
−40%
−30%
−20%
−10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Today's Home Prices
Percentage Change from 2007−2009 Peak
Frequency
−75% −50% −25% 0% 25% 50% 75%
Year over Year Change − Q4 2015
−10%
−8%
−6%
−4%
−2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
YoY Change in this quarter
YoY Percent Change
Frequency
−15% −10% −5% 0% 5% 10% 15%
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 19
Global Housing
The Bank for International Settlements has begun collecting global
housing indicies, which are useful for showing what has been happening
with global house prices. Note that these are not all the same data set -
each country measures housing prices in slightly different ways, so they
are only broadly comparable. Black lines are the data series, blue bars
on the right axis show the year over year percent change.
Brazil − Metro All Dwellings
Q12011=100
6080100140
Dec 2015: 137.10
Chile − All Dwellings
Jun 2015: 127.92
Peru (Lima) − All Dwellings
Dec 2015: 193.62
−4002040
Mexico − All Dwellings
Q12011=100
6080100140
Dec 2015: 126.60
China (Beijing) − All Dwellings
Dec 2015: 131.55
Hong Kong − Residential Prices
Jan 2016: 165.29
−4002040
Indonesia − Major Cities housing
Q12011=100
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
6080100140
Dec 2015: 135.71
India − Major Cities housing
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Sep 2015: 205.91
Singapore − All Dwellings
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Sep 2015: 100.00
−4002040
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 20
Philippines (Manila) − Flats
Q12011=100
6080120
Dec 2015: 146.25
Japan − All Dwellings
Nov 2015: 104.90
Australia − All Dwellings
Sep 2015: 126.97
−4002040
New Zealand − All Dwellings Big Cities
Q12011=100
6080120
Sep 2015: 153.58
Turkey − All Dwellings
Dec 2015: 193.00
South Africa − Residential
Feb 2016: 114.18
−4002040
Israel − All Dwellings
Q12011=100
6080120
Nov 2015: 134.11
Korea − All Dwellings
Feb 2016: 113.99
Russia − All Dwellings (Urban)
Sep 2015: 123.98
−4002040
Euro zone − All Dwellings
Q12011=100
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
6080120
Sep 2015: 99.15
Canada − New Houses
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Jan 2016: 109.60
US − New Single Family Houses
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Dec 2015: 123.48
−4002040
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 21
Global Business Indicators
Global Manufacturing PMI Reports
The Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) is an indicator reflecting
purchasing managers’ acquisition of goods and services. An index read-
ing of 50.0 means that business conditions are unchanged, a number
over 50.0 indicates an improvement while anything below 50.0 suggests
a decline. The further away from 50.0 the index is, the stronger the
change over the month. The chart at the bottom shows a moving av-
erage of a number of PMI’s, along with standard deviation bands to
show a global average.
Global M−PMI − March 2016
<40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 >60.0
Steady ExpandingContracting
Eurozone
51.6
Global PMI
50.5
TWN
51.1MEX
53.2
KOR
49.5
JPN
49.1
VNM
50.7
IDN
50.6
ZAF
47.0
AUS
58.1
BRA
46.0
CAN
51.5
CHN
49.7
IND
52.4
RUS
48.3
SAU
54.5
USA
51.5
Global M−PMI Monthly Change
<−5.0 −4.0 −3.0 −2.0 −1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 >5.0
PMI Change ImprovingDeteriorating
Eurozone
0.4
Global PMI
0.5
TWN
1.7MEX
0.1
KOR
0.8
JPN
−1.0
VNM
0.4
IDN
1.9
ZAF
−2.1
AUS
4.6
BRA
1.5
CAN
2.1
CHN
1.7
IND
1.3
RUS
−1.0
SAU
0.1
USA
0.2
Purchase Managers Index (Manufacturing) − China, Japan, USA, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, UK, Australia
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
3040506070
3040506070
Business Conditions Contracting
Business Conditions Expanding
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 22
Canadian Indicators
Retail Trade (SA)
YoYPercentChange
−50510
median: 4.67
Jan 2016: 6.38
Total Manufacturing Sales Growth
YoYPercentGrowth
−20−1001020
median: 3.83
Feb 2016: 3.85
Manufacturing New Orders Growth
YoYPercentGrowth
−30−100102030
median: 4.08
Feb 2016: 2.58
1yr vs. 10yr Canada Bond Yields
Yield(Percent)
0246810
median: 5.66
Mar 2016: 1.22
10 yr bond
1 yr bond
Manufacturing PMI
48505254
Mar 2016: 51.50
Sales and New Orders (SA)
YoYPercentChange
−20−1001020
Sales
New Orders (smoothed)
Tbill Yield Spread (10 yr − 3mo)
Spread(Percent)
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
−101234
median: 1.31
Mar 2016: 0.78
Inflation (total and core)
YoYPercentChange
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
−101234
median: 1.90
Feb 2016: 1.36
Total
Core
Inventory to Sales Ratio (SA)
Ratio
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1.31.41.51.6
median: 1.35
Feb 2016: 1.40
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 24
6.6 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6
1.31.41.51.61.71.81.9
Beveridge Curve (Mar 2011 − Dec 2015)
as.numeric(can.bev$ui.rate)
as.numeric(can.bev$vacancies)
Mar 2011 − Dec 2012
Jan 2013 − Nov 2015
Dec 2015
Unemployment Rate
JobVacancyrate(Industrial)
Ownership/Rental Price Ratio
RatioofAccomodationOwnership/RentRatio
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
90100110120130140150
Calgary
Montreal
Vancouver
Toronto
Note: Using prices relative to 2002 as base year
Ownership relatively more
expensive vs 2002
Rent relatively more expensive vs 2002
Unemployment Rate (SA)
Percent
345678910
Canada 7.1%
Alberta 7.1%
Ontario 6.8%
Debt Service Ratios (SA)
Percent
0246810
Total Debt: 6.2%
Mortgage: 3.2%
Consumer Debt: 6.2%
Housing Starts and Building Permits (smoothed)
YoYPercentChange
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
−40−2002040
Permits
Starts
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 25
European Indicators
Unemployment Rates
Percentage
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
051015202530
FR
DE
GB
IT
GR
ES
EU
Business Employment Expectations
Index
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
−40−20010
Industrial Orderbook Levels
Index
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
−60−40−20020
Country Employment
Expect.
Unempl.
(%)
Bond Yields
(%)
Retail
Turnover
Manufacturing
Turnover
Inflation
(YoY %)
Industry
Orderbook
PMI
Series Dates Mar 2016 Mar 2016 Mar 2016 Feb 2016 Feb 2016 Mar 2016 Mar 2016 Mar 2016
France -6.9 I 10.2 K 0.51 J 111.9 I 105.1 J -0.1 K -14.0 J 49.6 J
Germany -5.7 J 4.3 K 0.17 K NA 114.5 J 0.1 I -12.2 I 50.7 I
United Kingdom 3.2 I 5.0 K 1.46 I 113.8 J NA 0.5 -16.6 I 51.0 I
Italy -1.6 I 11.7 I 1.38 J 100.6 J NA -0.2 K -13.5 I 53.5 I
Greece -4.3 J 24.4 I 9.12 J NA NA -0.7 J -26.3 I 49.0 I
Spain 6.5 I 20.4 J 1.54 J NA NA -1.0 K -5.4 I 53.4 J
Eurozone (EU28) -2.2 I 8.9 K 1.19 J 108.0 J 109.8 I 0.0 -13.8 I NA
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 26
Government Bond YieldsLongTermYields%
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
0246810
Economic Sentiment
Index
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
60708090110130
Consumer Confidence
Index
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
−100−60−20020
Inflation (Harmonized Prices)
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
median: 1.90
Mar 2016: 0.00
−1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Harmonized Inflation: Feb 2016
AUT
0.6%
BGR
−1.9%
DEU
0.1%
ESP
−1.0%
FIN
0.0%
FRA
−0.1%
GBR
0.5%
GRC
−0.7%
HRV
−0.9%
HUN
−0.2%
IRL
−0.6%
ISL
0.3%
ITA
−0.2%
NOR
3.6%
POL
−0.4%
ROU
−2.4%
SWE
1.2%
<−1.0%0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% >7.0%
YoY % Change in Prices
PMI: March 2016
<40.042.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0>60.0
Steady ExpandingContracting
BRA
46.0
CAN
51.5
DEU
50.7
ESP
53.4
FRA
49.6
GBR
51.0
GRC
49.0
IRL
54.9
ITA
53.5
MEX
53.2
POL
53.8
SAU
54.5
TUR
49.2
USA
51.5
RUS
48.3
PMI Change: Feb − Mar
<−5.0−4.0 −3.0 −2.0 −1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 >5.0
PMI Change ImprovingDeteriorating
CAN
2.1
DEU
0.2
ESP
−0.7
FRA
−0.6
GBR
0.2
GRC
0.6
IRL
2.0
ITA
1.3
POL
1.0
TUR
−1.1
USA
0.2
RUS
−1.0
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 27
Chinese Indicators
Tracking the Chinese economy is a tricky. As reported in the Fi-
nancial Times, Premier Li Keqiang confided to US officials in 2007 that
gross domestic product was “man made” and “for reference only”. In-
stead, he suggested that it was much more useful to focus on three alter-
native indicators: electricity consumption, rail cargo volumes and bank
lending (still tracking down that last one). We also include the PMI
- which is an official version put out by the Chinese government and
differs slightly from an HSBC version. Finally we include the Shanghai
Composite Index as a measure of stock performance.
Manufacturing PMI
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
4045505560
Mar 2016: 49.70
Shanghai Composite Index
IndexValue(MonthlyHigh/Low)
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
0100030005000
Apr 2016: 3009.53
Electricity Generated
100MillionKWH(logscale)
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1000200030005000
Feb 2016: 4351.00
Electricity Generated
Long Term Trend
Short Term Average
Consumer Confidence Index
Index
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
98100102104106108110
median: 103.95
Feb 2016: 104.40
Exports
YoYPercentChange
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
−20020406080
median: 18.35
Feb 2016: −25.40
Retail Sales Growth
YoYPercentChange
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
101520
median: 12.90
Jan 2016: 10.20
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 28
Global Climate Change
Temperature and precipitation data are taken from the US National
Climatic Data Center and presented as the average monthly anomaly
from the previous 6 months. Anomalies are defined as the difference
from the average value over the period from 1971-2000 for the tem-
perature map and over the 20th century for the global temparature
chart.
Average Temperature Anomalies from Sep 2015 - Feb 2016
<−4.0 −3.0 −2.0 −1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 >4.0
Anomalies in Celcius WarmerCooler Anomalies in Celcius
−4 −2 0 2 4
Historic Global Temperature Deviations
DegreesCelciusDeviations
−0.50.00.51.0
Feb 2016: 1.21
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
www.lairdresearch.com April 18, 2016 Page 29