SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 22
James Quayson
Megabox Case Write UP
LSCM 4560 - Spring 2014
April 6, 2014
Executive Summary
From the data we collected we came up with four primary ways to ship each
product through the best mode of transportation. We decided we would ship
washers/dryers through Conference Sea. This is because washers/dryers have a
high cubic volume and are low value, bulk commodity goods and are not in as
high demand compared to HDTV’s and Zpads to the customers. Second we
decided to ship refrigerators through Non-conference Sea because that is the
only mode that they were in budget. They fit in this mode because CL (the
cheaper mode of transporting goods) was 90% and LCL is 10% creating a 20%
cost savings compared to conference sea. In addition to this there was a 15%
discount over Conference Sea. Refrigerators have the highest cubic volume
(which caused them to not in budget for all other modes), and the least amount of
wharfage costs if they were to ship by non-conference sea. Lastly we concluded
that we would ship HDTV's and Zpads through scheduled air. Although HDTV’S
appear not to be in scheduled air’s budget according to our calculations they are
indeed supposed to be transported through this mode of transportation. This is
because HDTV’S are high value perishable electronics which are usually
transported through air because they have the highest transit time. Since
inventory carrying cost and insurance is the same for scheduled and contract air
we must have calculated total QTR wrong even after trying several different
methods to make fit HDTV’s in scheduled and contract airs budget. Zpads are
high value items it would be best to transport them through scheduled air to
prevent it from loss and damage, and to achieve the best customer satisfaction
because it has the fastest transit time. These products high insurance costs, and
low inventory carrying do not prevent them from being out of budget for
scheduled and contract air. Scheduled air provides greater savings in the long
run when transporting these two electronics even though they have high
insurance costs.
1.Problem statement.
The problem Megabox faces is choosing which mode of transportation to
choose that will result in the most efficient way to move their product to Zumburu.
This is a problem because the company wants to be able to get their product to
their customer in a timely manner, but must maintain their budget.
Answering this problem is important to Megabox for many reasons.
Megabox is a company that distributes Televisions and tablets, as well as
consumer goods such as refrigerators, washers, and dryers. Their tasks is to
ship these goods to Zumburu. These products can either be shipped by Air or by
Sea. Each product has its own budget to be met. By not handling the budget
properly and choosing the right ways to ship these products could result in not
only a loss in revenue for Megabox but even a lost in future orders. On the other
hand if the product is shipped way under budget then that could result in the
shipping not being quick enough also resulting in potential future order loss.
Issues
Megabox has issues such as staying in budget, Maintaining a high level
of customer service, which modes to choose, and the stability of the Zumburu
government.
The government is an issue because they have never really had an economic
policy. Megabox is concerned that with the drying up of the oil revenues could
force the government to suddenly raise the import duties or even put limits on
importation, to control the outflow of current currency. This is a risk cause these
factors could make or break Megaboxs profitability or even ability to ship
products to Zumburu.
As mentioned earlier Megabox must consider budget. The main way to
accomplish this issue is through the cost saving analysis on shipping these
products. The way we are calculating this is by getting our budget by taking the
FOB/CIF terms, we would then calculate the total landed costs and subtract
these two to create our total savings.
Cost should be clearly Identified by the shipper and the receiver. We
have included this chart to show who will be paying for what.
Financial
Responisibilty
Cost occurred Megabox Zumburu
Transportation to
packing
X
Transportation to port X
Freight X
Unpack/Unstuffing X
Transportation to
consignee
X
Cargo Insurance X
Wharafage X
documentation X
Customs duty X
Storage fees at
destination port
X
Consignee Fee X
The issues of customer service and risks will not be of big problems for
management. This is because If we choose the most efficient route it would then
result in the best customer service. Risks Is also not that big of an issue because
when we select that mode of transportation we are accepting the tradeoff
between costs and potential risks.
2.
Alternatives
We had four different ways to ship freight from one location to another. Although
we would have loved to use all four modes of transportation to ship freight
accordingly, our budget couldn’t accommodate that. Therefore, we decided to
use the best mode of transportation, in our opinion, to ship each item according
to its value, weight, and cost.
Conference Sea- After we computed and compared total cost to our annual
budget for Conference Sea, we came to the conclusion that it would be best to
ship the washer and dryer through this mode of transportation. Although this
mode of transportation has the least amount of savings, it would be beneficial for
Mega box to ship washers and dryers through this way because they have the
lowest insurance cost, and consular fees out of all four goods. From this, we can
conclude that washers and dryers would be shipped best by Conference Sea
because they are low value and bulk commodities, which require higher transit
times.
Non-Conference Sea- Since refrigerators don’t fit in Conference Sea’s
scheduled and contract air’s budget, the only way to ship these low value, bulk
commodities would be through Non-Conference Sea. Also, since refrigerators
have the highest cubic ft. in volume (which caused them to not be in budget for
all other modes), and the least amount of wharfage costs, it would be beneficial
to Mega box if they were shipped through Non-Conference Sea. Lastly,
refrigerators have the third largest savings after high valuegoods like HDTV’S
and Zpads, which require the high insurance costs.
Scheduled Air- After looking at the alternatives, I believe it would be best to ship
HDTV’S and Zpads together through Scheduled Air. Although they have
insurance and low inventory carrying cost, we and customers receiving these
goods would prefer to send these items through Scheduled Air, so they can be
delivered in the fastest way possible, and in good condition, since they’re high
value goods that can’t be taken through Conference Sea and Non-Conference
Sea.
Contract Air- Although Contract Air sounds cheaper because it offers a 10%
discount of scheduled air, it costs more money at the end because one has to fill
4000 cubic ft. /week and have a one year contract. Although Mega box could’ve
shipped HDTV’s and Zpads through Contract Air, we decided to ship them
through Scheduled Air. In addition to this, erratic changes in government might
cost Mega box more money.
4.Analysis of Alternatives and Costs
The 4 alternatives we looked at for our analysis are Conference Sea, Non-
conference Sea, scheduled air, and contract air. For each of these different
alternatives the total costs, budget and customer service we all calculated. Each
mode has there own uniqueness with concerns of pricing and volume constrains
for air.
Conference Sea is the first alternative that was computed. This mode is the most
basic of the modes concerning costs. Conference sea required had a required
70/30 percentage spilt between container load (CL) and less than container load
(LCL).
Conference Ship Vol Container CL Vol LCL Vol
Sea Cubic ft Volume 70% 30%
HDTV 20.25 5135.80 $3,595.06 $1,540.74
Refrigerator 72.00 1444.44 $1,011.11 $433.33
Washer/Dryer
Combo
60.00 1733.33 $1,213.33 $520.00
Z-Pad 1.00 104000.00 $72,800.00 $31,200.00
The above table shows the total container volume and the distribution of the total
volume being distributed to 70% CL and 30% LCL. The way the container
volume was calculated was 2000 cubic feet divided by the shipping volume of the
particular product then multiplied by 52wks. The reason for using 2000 cubic feet
because Conference Sea required that all containers to be shipped in 40 foot
equivalent unit (FEU). The Cl and LCL volumes each traveled at different rates
per cubic feet shipped. The Cl rate for Conference Sea is $8.40 and LCL is
$13.10. Those costs included transportation to, packing/container, transportation
to port, freight, and unpacking/un-stuffing. When we calculated the LCL and CL
freight costs the yearly demand was adjusted by 10% since the forecast is
usually over forecasted. For the cost we then multiplied by .9 of the demand to
get the 10% adjustment. CL freight is cheaper to ship even though it has higher
total numbers but the volume being shipped is much higher than the LCL.
Conference Cl LCL
Sea Freight Freight
HDTV $565,284.83 $242,264.93
Refrigerator $1,733,659.20 $742,996.80
Washer/Dryer Combo $317,520.00 $136,080.00
Z-Pad $235,494.00 $100,926.00
The above table shows the cost distribution between Cl and LCL. These were
calculated by taking 70% or 30% of the total yearly demand times by the
shipment volume of the particular product times by the cost of either Cl or LCL.
Next insurance is going to be discussed. The insurance costs once again
difference between CL and LCL. CL cargo insurance is 1.5% and 1.75% LCL of
CIF. Since Conference Sea gets a 2% discount off of CIF that is the number that
is used for all the CIF calculations. Once again the forecast had to be adjusted
to what will probably actual so demand is multiplied by .9 of the 2% CIF price
multiplied by they CL or LCL parentage calculations of 1.5% or 1.75%. The
percentages included the losses and damages of the cargo. Refer to the chart
below to view the insurance distribution costs. Insurance costs make
Conference Insurance Insurance Insurance
Sea CL LCL Total
HDTV $63,507.31 $30,241.58 $93,748.88
Refrigerator $46,351.31 $22,072.05 $68,423.36
Washer/Dryer
Combo
$11,113.20 $5,292.00 $16,405.20
Z-Pad $339,994.46 $161,902.13 $501,896.59
up a good portion of the cost to ship the products across the ocean. Next to
calculate the inventory carrying costs. It took more time to ship LCL good than CL.
Shipping LCL goods it takes 34 days for a product to get from the factory and then
to be unloaded at the port. CL shipments take more time it takes 41 days till the
products reach the storage area at the port. With these long transit times the
inventory carrying costs would be expected to be high but our findings did not have
see that. The carrying cost
Conference Inv Carry Inv Carry
Sea Cost (CL) Cost (LCL)
HDTV $93.77 $48.46
Refrigerator $26.37 $13.63
Washer/Dryer Combo $31.65 $16.36
Z-Pad $1,898.78 $981.30
are computed by taking the transit time divided by the number of days in a year
then multiplied by 28% which is the inventory carrying costs percentage of the
products then multiplied by the volume being shipped. The budget is the
difference between CIF 2% minus FOB price multiplied by the demand. The total
costs are all the costs associated with the product added together.
Conference FOB CIF 2% off Total
Sea Price Price CIF Budget Cost
HDTV $1,000.0
0
$1,300.0
0
$1,274.0
0
$1,300,815.0
0
$1,112,491.1
7
Refrigerator $450.00 $1,100.0
0
$1,078.0
0
$2,571,660.0
0
$2,602,474.6
3
Washer/Dry
er Combo
$550.00 $1,200.0
0
$1,176.0
0
$563,400.00 $525,963.20
Z-Pad $650.00 $825.00 $808.50 $6,347,925.0
0
$3,203,621.6
8
This is everything that is associated with Conference Sea. The next alternative
that will be discussed is Non-Conference Sea.
Non-Conference Sea is very similar to Conference Sea. There are a few distinct
differences but for the most part it is identical. The split for CL and LCL is 90/10
and there is a discount of 15% for Non-Conference Sea. Non-Conference Sea
also used different type of container instead of using the 40 FEU Non-
Conference Sea uses, 20 FEU are used. They do not fit as much product by
they are easier to unload and load so they are little bit more efficient. Cost of the
freight has the same formula as Conference Sea just the 15% discount has to be
included which the table below is demonstrating. The insurance costs are
computed and are the same as Conference
Non Conference
Sea
Cl LCL Total
Freight Freight Freight
HDTV $617,775.56 $108,682.74 $726,458.30
Refrigerator $1,894,641.84 $333,316.62 $2,227,958.46
Washer/Dryer
Combo
$347,004.00 $61,047.00 $408,051.00
Sea because the transit times are the same. Scheduled air is the next alternative
being looked at which has unique characteristics.
Scheduled air is quite different from the modes that have already been
discussed. Scheduled air requires 3000 cubic feet of cargo every week if
Megabox goes over the 3000 cubic feet then it has to go to the spot market for
that quarter which charges a higher rate than the scheduled air rate. Scheduled
air is based on a per quarter demand unlike the conference sea and non-
conference sea which are on an annually basis. To get all of the quarter
demands into a weekly form, the demands are divided by 13 since there are 13
weeks in a quarter. Below is showing how the quarters
Scheduled
Air
Total
Qtr1 Qrt2 Qtr3 Qtr 4 Freight
HDTV 1682.3076
92
1892.5961
54
2803.8461
54
1016.3942
31
7395.1442
31
Refrigerato
r
4984.6153
85
6230.7692
31
7476.9230
77
3987.6923
08
22680
Washer/Dry
er Combo
415.38461
54
1038.4615
38
1246.1538
46
1453.8461
54
4153.8461
54
Z-Pad 830.76923
08
761.53846
15
934.61538
46
553.84615
38
3080.7692
31
are broken down. To compute the quarter demands are divided by 13 then
multiplied by the shipment volume of 1 unit of product. Since we are limited to
only 3000 cubic feet not all of the products can go by the scheduled air rate
which is $20.50 per shipped cubic foot. Going out in the spot market the rate is
20% higher. The refrigerator and washer and dryer for the most part have to go
at the 20% higher rate because they will not fit with the Z-pads and HDTV’s. The
chart below shows the cost breakdown per
Scheduled
Air
Qtr1 Cost Qrt2 Cost
Qtr3 Cost Qtr 4 Cost
HDTV $448,335.00 $504,376.88 $896,670.00 $270,869.06
Refrigerator $1,594,080.0
0
$1,992,600.0
0
$2,391,120.0
0
$1,275,264.0
0
Washer/Drye
r Combo
$110,700.00 $332,100.00 $398,520.00 $387,450.00
Z-Pad $221,400.00 $202,950.00 $249,075.00 $147,600.00
quarter, the areas in blue are being shipped in the spot market because including
them will exceed the 3000 cubic feet. Z-pad and HDTV are picked first to go
because they are more expensive and more likely to get damaged in transit. The
inventory carrying costs for scheduled air is still the 28% but the number of days
in transit is 7.5 divided by 365 then multiplied by the total freight being shipped.
The insurance is a little bit more
Scheduled Air Total Inv Carry
Freight Cost
HDTV 7395.144231 $42.55
Refrigerator 22680 $130.49
Washer/Dryer Combo 4153.846154 $23.90
Z-Pad 3080.769231 $17.72
complicated in computing than the other alternatives. The cargo insurance is 1%
of the CIP value plus 10%. Cargo insurance is more expensive for air because
the mode it is traveling on and there is a limited amount of space on every
aircraft.
Scheduled Air Insurance
HDTV $201,887.44
Refrigerator $523,908.00
Washer/Dryer Combo $104,676.92
Z-Pad $53,374.33
The budget for scheduled air is the difference of CIP and FOB multiplied by the
demand. The washer/dryer and refrigerator went over budget and they are more
bulky so it does not make since to ship them by air. The last alternative is
contract air.
For contract air Megabox is looking at signing a contract that reserves 4000 cubic
feet of space and can fill that space in any way we please if it is not filled
Megabox still pays for the space. The z-pad and the HDTV take up the bulk of
the space and then the washer and dryer combo. The insurance is computed the
same way as scheduled air
Con
trac
t Air
Qtr
1
Qrt
2
Qtr
3
Qtr
4
HDT
V
168
2.3
076
92
189
2.5
961
54
280
3.8
461
54
101
6.3
942
31
Refr
iger
ator
498
4.6
153
85
623
0.7
692
31
747
6.9
230
77
398
7.6
923
08
Was
her/
Dry
er
Co
mbo
415
.38
461
54
103
8.4
615
38
124
6.1
538
46
145
3.8
461
54
Z-
Pad
830
.76
923
08
761
.53
846
15
934
.61
538
46
553
.84
615
38
Con
fere
Non
Con
fere
nce
Sea
nce
Sea
Tota
l
Tota
l
Bud
get
Cost Diffe
renc
e
Bud
get
Cost Diffe
renc
e
HDT
V
$1,3
00,8
15.0
0
$1,1
12,4
91.1
7
$188
,323.
83
$1,4
24,2
50.0
0
$90
6,32
3.21
$51
7,92
6.79
Refr
iger
ator
$2,5
71,6
60.0
0
$2,6
02,4
74.6
3
($30,
814.
63)
$2,6
61,7
50.0
0
$2,3
22,5
23.7
8
$33
9,22
6.22
Was
her/
Dry
er
Co
mbo
$56
3,40
0.00
$52
5,96
3.20
$37,
436.
80
$58
5,00
0.00
$44
1,86
1.00
$14
3,13
9.00
Z-
Pad
$6,3
47,9
$3,2
03,6
$3,1
44,3
$7,0
08,7
$1,5
85,1
$5,4
23,5
25.0
0
21.6
8
03.3
2
50.0
0
59.2
9
90.7
1
Sch
edul
ed
Air
Con
trac
t Air
HDT
V
Tota
l
Tota
l
Refr
iger
ator
Bud
get
Cost Diffe
renc
e
Diffe
renc
e
Bud
get
Cost Diffe
renc
e
Was
her/
Dry
er
Co
mbo
$1,4
24,2
50.0
0
$2,6
09,9
98.1
1
($1,1
85,7
48.1
1)
$51
7,92
6.79
$1,4
24,2
50.0
0
$2,1
77,4
24.0
8
($75
3,17
4.08)
Z-
Pad
$2,6
61,7
50.0
0
$8,4
19,2
29.9
9
($5,7
57,4
79.9
9)
$33
9,22
6.22
$2,6
61,7
50.0
0
$6,0
94,8
76.4
9
($3,4
33,1
26.4
9)
$58
5,00
0.00
$1,4
63,0
36.2
1
($87
8,03
6.21)
$14
3,13
9.00
$58
5,00
0.00
$1,1
32,9
50.8
2
($54
7,95
0.82)
$7,0
08,7
50.0
0
$1,1
98,2
82.9
2
$5,8
10,4
67.0
8
$5,4
23,5
90.7
1
$7,0
08,7
50.0
0
$1,8
78,6
70.8
0
$5,1
30,0
79.2
0
cargo. The budget and total cost is the same as scheduled air the high value
items will more likely be the items to go by air and they washer dry and
refrigerator will use a different type of mode.
5.Recommendations:
Conferenc
e Sea
Non-
Conferen
ce Sea
Total Total
Budget Cost Difference Budget Cost Differenc
e
HDTV $1,300,81
5.00
$1,112,49
1.17
$188,323.
83
$1,424,2
50.00
$906,323.
21
$517,926.
79
Refrigera
tor
$2,571,66
0.00
$2,602,47
4.63
($30,814.6
3)
$2,661,7
50.00
$2,322,52
3.78
$339,226.
22
Washer/
Dryer
Combo
$563,400.
00
$525,963.
20
$37,436.8
0
$585,000
.00
$441,861.
00
$143,139.
00
Z-Pad $6,347,92
5.00
$3,203,62
1.68
$3,144,30
3.32
$7,008,7
50.00
$1,585,15
9.29
$5,423,59
0.71
Schedul
ed Air
Contract
Air
HDTV Total Total
Refrige
rator
Budget Cost Differenc
e
Differen
ce
Budget Cost Differen
ce
Washer
/Dryer
Combo
$1,424,2
50.00
$2,609,9
98.11
($1,185,7
48.11)
$517,92
6.79
$1,424,2
50.00
$2,177,4
24.08
($753,1
74.08)
Z-Pad $2,661,7
50.00
$8,419,2
29.99
($5,757,4
79.99)
$339,22
6.22
$2,661,7
50.00
$6,094,8
76.49
($3,433,
126.49)
$585,00
0.00
$1,463,0
36.21
($878,03
6.21)
$143,13
9.00
$585,00
0.00
$1,132,9
50.82
($547,9
50.82)
$7,008,7
50.00
$1,198,2
82.92
$5,810,4
67.08
$5,423,5
90.71
$7,008,7
50.00
$1,878,6
70.80
$5,130,
079.20
As we calculated the budget and total cost for each mode of transportation
beside it we stated the difference between the two to determine if it were in
budge or not. Zpads and HDTVS were in budget for all modes, but are very
expensive goods, and are needed to be shipped in the fastest way so we placed
them accordingly.
Washer/Dryer- We recommend Megabox ships washers/dryers through
Conference Sea for many reasons. First, washers and dryers can only be
transported through Conference Sea, and Non-conference Sea because they do
not fit in Scheduled and Contract air budgets. This is because washers and
dryers have high cubic volume which causes them to go over budget when
shipping through air. Also since they are low value, bulk commodity goods and
are not in high demand compared to HDTV’s and Zpads by the customers, it
would best to ship them through Conference Sea. Since this mode of
transportation separated CL and LCL (because the sea containers are usually
20-40 ft) it would be best to ship washers and dryers through this mode of
transportation. Lastly since washers and dryers have the lost insurance cost
(which could also be detrimental because they have the highest loss and
damage), CL shipments are less expensive than LCL shipments we would put
70% CL and 30% LCL so we can have the greatest of savings.
Refrigerators- According to our calculations refrigerators can only be transported
through Non-conference Sea, because it has the inherent advantage in capacity,
and carries low value bulk commodities. Since refrigerators have the highest
cubic ft it causes them to go over budget/ split in majority of the modes. Second
since CL shipments are less expensive than LCL shipments and Non-conference
Sea has a 90/30 ratio having 20% greater savings than Non-conference Sea,
there is a great amount of savings when it comes to transporting refrigerators.
HDTV’S - Although HDTV’S appear not to be in scheduled air’s budget
according to our calculations they are indeed supposed to be transported through
scheduled or contract air. This is because HDTV’S are high value electronics
which are usually transported through air because they have the highest transit
time. Also HDTV’s are in high demand by customers and would lose Mega box a
lot of money and customer loyalty if shipped through conference and non-
conference sea. Since inventory carrying cost and insurance is the same for
scheduled and contract air we must have calculated total QTR wrong even after
trying several different methods to make fit HDTV’s in scheduled and contract
airs budget.
Zpads- Lastly Zpads are high value items it would be best to transport them
through scheduled air to prevent it from loss and damage, and to achieve the
best customer satisfaction because it has the fastest transit time. These products
high insurance costs, and low inventory carrying do not prevent them from being
out of budget for scheduled and contract air. Scheduled air provides greater
savings in the long run when transporting these two electronics even though they
have high insurance costs (because they’re high value items). Lastly shipping
these products by air will ensure they customer they will get to their final
destination in the fastest/ safest way there is

More Related Content

What's hot

Inland water transport is the future logistics dimension
Inland water transport is the future logistics dimensionInland water transport is the future logistics dimension
Inland water transport is the future logistics dimensionShikha Agarwal
 
SHIPPING ACCOUNTS – THE FRAMEWORKFOR DECISIONS
SHIPPING ACCOUNTS – THE FRAMEWORKFOR DECISIONSSHIPPING ACCOUNTS – THE FRAMEWORKFOR DECISIONS
SHIPPING ACCOUNTS – THE FRAMEWORKFOR DECISIONSIndian maritime university
 
Livraison sans connaissement
Livraison sans connaissementLivraison sans connaissement
Livraison sans connaissementRabah HELAL
 
Extrait de l'ouvrage Le Lamy Transport - Tome 2
Extrait de l'ouvrage Le Lamy Transport - Tome 2Extrait de l'ouvrage Le Lamy Transport - Tome 2
Extrait de l'ouvrage Le Lamy Transport - Tome 2Nathalie Delatour
 
Taller 1 negocios internacionales
Taller 1 negocios internacionalesTaller 1 negocios internacionales
Taller 1 negocios internacionalesYimer Gomez
 
Reefer container market
Reefer container marketReefer container market
Reefer container marketMOHIMENUL
 
Institute Cargo Clauses in Marine Insurance By SN panigrahi
Institute Cargo Clauses in Marine Insurance By SN panigrahiInstitute Cargo Clauses in Marine Insurance By SN panigrahi
Institute Cargo Clauses in Marine Insurance By SN panigrahiSN Panigrahi, PMP
 
Decision making criteria in transport management 1
Decision making criteria in transport management 1Decision making criteria in transport management 1
Decision making criteria in transport management 1Keshar Khadka
 
Transshipment and shipside
Transshipment  and shipsideTransshipment  and shipside
Transshipment and shipsideDanna
 
Multimoda & inter. freight forwarding presentation
Multimoda & inter. freight forwarding presentationMultimoda & inter. freight forwarding presentation
Multimoda & inter. freight forwarding presentationsyalindrihs
 
Responsabilité et obligations du chargeur en conteneurs
  Responsabilité et obligations du chargeur en conteneurs  Responsabilité et obligations du chargeur en conteneurs
Responsabilité et obligations du chargeur en conteneursRabah HELAL
 

What's hot (20)

Transporte multimodal
Transporte multimodalTransporte multimodal
Transporte multimodal
 
Inland water transport is the future logistics dimension
Inland water transport is the future logistics dimensionInland water transport is the future logistics dimension
Inland water transport is the future logistics dimension
 
SHIPPING ACCOUNTS – THE FRAMEWORKFOR DECISIONS
SHIPPING ACCOUNTS – THE FRAMEWORKFOR DECISIONSSHIPPING ACCOUNTS – THE FRAMEWORKFOR DECISIONS
SHIPPING ACCOUNTS – THE FRAMEWORKFOR DECISIONS
 
Shipping industry
Shipping industryShipping industry
Shipping industry
 
Bulk carrier
Bulk carrierBulk carrier
Bulk carrier
 
CONTAINER SHIP DESIGN REPORT
CONTAINER SHIP DESIGN REPORTCONTAINER SHIP DESIGN REPORT
CONTAINER SHIP DESIGN REPORT
 
Livraison sans connaissement
Livraison sans connaissementLivraison sans connaissement
Livraison sans connaissement
 
Extrait de l'ouvrage Le Lamy Transport - Tome 2
Extrait de l'ouvrage Le Lamy Transport - Tome 2Extrait de l'ouvrage Le Lamy Transport - Tome 2
Extrait de l'ouvrage Le Lamy Transport - Tome 2
 
Taller 1 negocios internacionales
Taller 1 negocios internacionalesTaller 1 negocios internacionales
Taller 1 negocios internacionales
 
Reefer container market
Reefer container marketReefer container market
Reefer container market
 
Shipping
ShippingShipping
Shipping
 
Institute Cargo Clauses in Marine Insurance By SN panigrahi
Institute Cargo Clauses in Marine Insurance By SN panigrahiInstitute Cargo Clauses in Marine Insurance By SN panigrahi
Institute Cargo Clauses in Marine Insurance By SN panigrahi
 
The incoterms
The incotermsThe incoterms
The incoterms
 
Decision making criteria in transport management 1
Decision making criteria in transport management 1Decision making criteria in transport management 1
Decision making criteria in transport management 1
 
Transshipment and shipside
Transshipment  and shipsideTransshipment  and shipside
Transshipment and shipside
 
שילוח בינלאומי
שילוח בינלאומישילוח בינלאומי
שילוח בינלאומי
 
Port tariff
Port tariffPort tariff
Port tariff
 
Multimoda & inter. freight forwarding presentation
Multimoda & inter. freight forwarding presentationMultimoda & inter. freight forwarding presentation
Multimoda & inter. freight forwarding presentation
 
Responsabilité et obligations du chargeur en conteneurs
  Responsabilité et obligations du chargeur en conteneurs  Responsabilité et obligations du chargeur en conteneurs
Responsabilité et obligations du chargeur en conteneurs
 
Transporte internacional alfredo2014
Transporte internacional alfredo2014Transporte internacional alfredo2014
Transporte internacional alfredo2014
 

Similar to Megabox Write UP_James Quayson

Megabox Write-Up docx
Megabox Write-Up docxMegabox Write-Up docx
Megabox Write-Up docxcatalina_q07
 
Vns fashion logistics
Vns fashion logisticsVns fashion logistics
Vns fashion logisticsnguhuantrung
 
Nnw freight outsource model
Nnw   freight outsource modelNnw   freight outsource model
Nnw freight outsource modelTom Evans
 
Logistics Sustainability & Profitability 101
Logistics Sustainability & Profitability 101Logistics Sustainability & Profitability 101
Logistics Sustainability & Profitability 101kevinjmireles
 
Global Container Pooling Sept 2009
Global Container Pooling   Sept 2009Global Container Pooling   Sept 2009
Global Container Pooling Sept 2009rab2020
 
M Bridge 10 CASA 2021 A review of Demand and Supply of Shipping.pdf
M Bridge 10 CASA 2021 A review of Demand and Supply of Shipping.pdfM Bridge 10 CASA 2021 A review of Demand and Supply of Shipping.pdf
M Bridge 10 CASA 2021 A review of Demand and Supply of Shipping.pdfCINEC Campus
 
leaflet_We4Sea
leaflet_We4Sealeaflet_We4Sea
leaflet_We4SeaDan Veen
 
A to z glossary of apparel costing free e book by anjuli g
A to z glossary of apparel costing free e book by anjuli gA to z glossary of apparel costing free e book by anjuli g
A to z glossary of apparel costing free e book by anjuli gAnjuli Gopalakrishna
 
Graebel_inMOTION_IntlHHG_US
Graebel_inMOTION_IntlHHG_USGraebel_inMOTION_IntlHHG_US
Graebel_inMOTION_IntlHHG_USPat Liberati
 
bimco-greener way of transportation
bimco-greener way of transportationbimco-greener way of transportation
bimco-greener way of transportationHossein J.Kamali
 
Free e book on apparel costing a to z glossary
Free e book on apparel costing a to z glossaryFree e book on apparel costing a to z glossary
Free e book on apparel costing a to z glossaryAnjuli Gopalakrishna
 
Poly Shield Technologies Incorporated SHPR - Equities.com Research Report
Poly Shield Technologies Incorporated SHPR - Equities.com Research ReportPoly Shield Technologies Incorporated SHPR - Equities.com Research Report
Poly Shield Technologies Incorporated SHPR - Equities.com Research ReportEquities.com Smith
 
Transportation management
Transportation managementTransportation management
Transportation managementJhOnie JhOan
 
15Logistics Plan for International Transport and
15Logistics Plan for International Transport and15Logistics Plan for International Transport and
15Logistics Plan for International Transport andKiyokoSlagleis
 
15Logistics Plan for International Transport and
15Logistics Plan for International Transport and15Logistics Plan for International Transport and
15Logistics Plan for International Transport andAnastaciaShadelb
 
CMA CGM DPW -May 21 2013
CMA CGM DPW -May 21 2013CMA CGM DPW -May 21 2013
CMA CGM DPW -May 21 2013Vino Kumar
 
IMPORT EXPORT.pptx
IMPORT EXPORT.pptxIMPORT EXPORT.pptx
IMPORT EXPORT.pptxmoshoo1
 

Similar to Megabox Write UP_James Quayson (20)

Megabox Write-Up docx
Megabox Write-Up docxMegabox Write-Up docx
Megabox Write-Up docx
 
Vns fashion logistics
Vns fashion logisticsVns fashion logistics
Vns fashion logistics
 
Nnw freight outsource model
Nnw   freight outsource modelNnw   freight outsource model
Nnw freight outsource model
 
Logistics Sustainability & Profitability 101
Logistics Sustainability & Profitability 101Logistics Sustainability & Profitability 101
Logistics Sustainability & Profitability 101
 
Global Container Pooling Sept 2009
Global Container Pooling   Sept 2009Global Container Pooling   Sept 2009
Global Container Pooling Sept 2009
 
M Bridge 10 CASA 2021 A review of Demand and Supply of Shipping.pdf
M Bridge 10 CASA 2021 A review of Demand and Supply of Shipping.pdfM Bridge 10 CASA 2021 A review of Demand and Supply of Shipping.pdf
M Bridge 10 CASA 2021 A review of Demand and Supply of Shipping.pdf
 
leaflet_We4Sea
leaflet_We4Sealeaflet_We4Sea
leaflet_We4Sea
 
A to z glossary of apparel costing free e book by anjuli g
A to z glossary of apparel costing free e book by anjuli gA to z glossary of apparel costing free e book by anjuli g
A to z glossary of apparel costing free e book by anjuli g
 
Graebel_inMOTION_IntlHHG_US
Graebel_inMOTION_IntlHHG_USGraebel_inMOTION_IntlHHG_US
Graebel_inMOTION_IntlHHG_US
 
bimco-greener way of transportation
bimco-greener way of transportationbimco-greener way of transportation
bimco-greener way of transportation
 
Free e book on apparel costing a to z glossary
Free e book on apparel costing a to z glossaryFree e book on apparel costing a to z glossary
Free e book on apparel costing a to z glossary
 
Poly Shield Technologies Incorporated SHPR - Equities.com Research Report
Poly Shield Technologies Incorporated SHPR - Equities.com Research ReportPoly Shield Technologies Incorporated SHPR - Equities.com Research Report
Poly Shield Technologies Incorporated SHPR - Equities.com Research Report
 
cargo-shipping-rates.docx
cargo-shipping-rates.docxcargo-shipping-rates.docx
cargo-shipping-rates.docx
 
Transportation management
Transportation managementTransportation management
Transportation management
 
Name 457 maritime economics and management shipping
Name 457 maritime economics and management  shippingName 457 maritime economics and management  shipping
Name 457 maritime economics and management shipping
 
15Logistics Plan for International Transport and
15Logistics Plan for International Transport and15Logistics Plan for International Transport and
15Logistics Plan for International Transport and
 
15Logistics Plan for International Transport and
15Logistics Plan for International Transport and15Logistics Plan for International Transport and
15Logistics Plan for International Transport and
 
Shipping and inco term
Shipping and inco termShipping and inco term
Shipping and inco term
 
CMA CGM DPW -May 21 2013
CMA CGM DPW -May 21 2013CMA CGM DPW -May 21 2013
CMA CGM DPW -May 21 2013
 
IMPORT EXPORT.pptx
IMPORT EXPORT.pptxIMPORT EXPORT.pptx
IMPORT EXPORT.pptx
 

Megabox Write UP_James Quayson

  • 1. James Quayson Megabox Case Write UP LSCM 4560 - Spring 2014 April 6, 2014 Executive Summary
  • 2. From the data we collected we came up with four primary ways to ship each product through the best mode of transportation. We decided we would ship washers/dryers through Conference Sea. This is because washers/dryers have a high cubic volume and are low value, bulk commodity goods and are not in as high demand compared to HDTV’s and Zpads to the customers. Second we decided to ship refrigerators through Non-conference Sea because that is the only mode that they were in budget. They fit in this mode because CL (the cheaper mode of transporting goods) was 90% and LCL is 10% creating a 20% cost savings compared to conference sea. In addition to this there was a 15% discount over Conference Sea. Refrigerators have the highest cubic volume (which caused them to not in budget for all other modes), and the least amount of wharfage costs if they were to ship by non-conference sea. Lastly we concluded that we would ship HDTV's and Zpads through scheduled air. Although HDTV’S appear not to be in scheduled air’s budget according to our calculations they are indeed supposed to be transported through this mode of transportation. This is because HDTV’S are high value perishable electronics which are usually transported through air because they have the highest transit time. Since inventory carrying cost and insurance is the same for scheduled and contract air we must have calculated total QTR wrong even after trying several different methods to make fit HDTV’s in scheduled and contract airs budget. Zpads are high value items it would be best to transport them through scheduled air to prevent it from loss and damage, and to achieve the best customer satisfaction because it has the fastest transit time. These products high insurance costs, and low inventory carrying do not prevent them from being out of budget for scheduled and contract air. Scheduled air provides greater savings in the long run when transporting these two electronics even though they have high insurance costs. 1.Problem statement. The problem Megabox faces is choosing which mode of transportation to choose that will result in the most efficient way to move their product to Zumburu.
  • 3. This is a problem because the company wants to be able to get their product to their customer in a timely manner, but must maintain their budget. Answering this problem is important to Megabox for many reasons. Megabox is a company that distributes Televisions and tablets, as well as consumer goods such as refrigerators, washers, and dryers. Their tasks is to ship these goods to Zumburu. These products can either be shipped by Air or by Sea. Each product has its own budget to be met. By not handling the budget properly and choosing the right ways to ship these products could result in not only a loss in revenue for Megabox but even a lost in future orders. On the other hand if the product is shipped way under budget then that could result in the shipping not being quick enough also resulting in potential future order loss. Issues Megabox has issues such as staying in budget, Maintaining a high level of customer service, which modes to choose, and the stability of the Zumburu government. The government is an issue because they have never really had an economic policy. Megabox is concerned that with the drying up of the oil revenues could force the government to suddenly raise the import duties or even put limits on importation, to control the outflow of current currency. This is a risk cause these factors could make or break Megaboxs profitability or even ability to ship products to Zumburu. As mentioned earlier Megabox must consider budget. The main way to accomplish this issue is through the cost saving analysis on shipping these
  • 4. products. The way we are calculating this is by getting our budget by taking the FOB/CIF terms, we would then calculate the total landed costs and subtract these two to create our total savings. Cost should be clearly Identified by the shipper and the receiver. We have included this chart to show who will be paying for what. Financial Responisibilty Cost occurred Megabox Zumburu Transportation to packing X Transportation to port X Freight X Unpack/Unstuffing X Transportation to consignee X Cargo Insurance X Wharafage X documentation X Customs duty X Storage fees at destination port X Consignee Fee X
  • 5. The issues of customer service and risks will not be of big problems for management. This is because If we choose the most efficient route it would then result in the best customer service. Risks Is also not that big of an issue because when we select that mode of transportation we are accepting the tradeoff between costs and potential risks. 2. Alternatives We had four different ways to ship freight from one location to another. Although we would have loved to use all four modes of transportation to ship freight accordingly, our budget couldn’t accommodate that. Therefore, we decided to use the best mode of transportation, in our opinion, to ship each item according to its value, weight, and cost. Conference Sea- After we computed and compared total cost to our annual budget for Conference Sea, we came to the conclusion that it would be best to ship the washer and dryer through this mode of transportation. Although this mode of transportation has the least amount of savings, it would be beneficial for Mega box to ship washers and dryers through this way because they have the lowest insurance cost, and consular fees out of all four goods. From this, we can conclude that washers and dryers would be shipped best by Conference Sea because they are low value and bulk commodities, which require higher transit times.
  • 6. Non-Conference Sea- Since refrigerators don’t fit in Conference Sea’s scheduled and contract air’s budget, the only way to ship these low value, bulk commodities would be through Non-Conference Sea. Also, since refrigerators have the highest cubic ft. in volume (which caused them to not be in budget for all other modes), and the least amount of wharfage costs, it would be beneficial to Mega box if they were shipped through Non-Conference Sea. Lastly, refrigerators have the third largest savings after high valuegoods like HDTV’S and Zpads, which require the high insurance costs. Scheduled Air- After looking at the alternatives, I believe it would be best to ship HDTV’S and Zpads together through Scheduled Air. Although they have insurance and low inventory carrying cost, we and customers receiving these goods would prefer to send these items through Scheduled Air, so they can be delivered in the fastest way possible, and in good condition, since they’re high value goods that can’t be taken through Conference Sea and Non-Conference Sea. Contract Air- Although Contract Air sounds cheaper because it offers a 10% discount of scheduled air, it costs more money at the end because one has to fill 4000 cubic ft. /week and have a one year contract. Although Mega box could’ve shipped HDTV’s and Zpads through Contract Air, we decided to ship them through Scheduled Air. In addition to this, erratic changes in government might cost Mega box more money. 4.Analysis of Alternatives and Costs
  • 7. The 4 alternatives we looked at for our analysis are Conference Sea, Non- conference Sea, scheduled air, and contract air. For each of these different alternatives the total costs, budget and customer service we all calculated. Each mode has there own uniqueness with concerns of pricing and volume constrains for air. Conference Sea is the first alternative that was computed. This mode is the most basic of the modes concerning costs. Conference sea required had a required 70/30 percentage spilt between container load (CL) and less than container load (LCL). Conference Ship Vol Container CL Vol LCL Vol Sea Cubic ft Volume 70% 30% HDTV 20.25 5135.80 $3,595.06 $1,540.74 Refrigerator 72.00 1444.44 $1,011.11 $433.33 Washer/Dryer Combo 60.00 1733.33 $1,213.33 $520.00 Z-Pad 1.00 104000.00 $72,800.00 $31,200.00 The above table shows the total container volume and the distribution of the total volume being distributed to 70% CL and 30% LCL. The way the container volume was calculated was 2000 cubic feet divided by the shipping volume of the particular product then multiplied by 52wks. The reason for using 2000 cubic feet because Conference Sea required that all containers to be shipped in 40 foot
  • 8. equivalent unit (FEU). The Cl and LCL volumes each traveled at different rates per cubic feet shipped. The Cl rate for Conference Sea is $8.40 and LCL is $13.10. Those costs included transportation to, packing/container, transportation to port, freight, and unpacking/un-stuffing. When we calculated the LCL and CL freight costs the yearly demand was adjusted by 10% since the forecast is usually over forecasted. For the cost we then multiplied by .9 of the demand to get the 10% adjustment. CL freight is cheaper to ship even though it has higher total numbers but the volume being shipped is much higher than the LCL. Conference Cl LCL Sea Freight Freight HDTV $565,284.83 $242,264.93 Refrigerator $1,733,659.20 $742,996.80 Washer/Dryer Combo $317,520.00 $136,080.00 Z-Pad $235,494.00 $100,926.00 The above table shows the cost distribution between Cl and LCL. These were calculated by taking 70% or 30% of the total yearly demand times by the shipment volume of the particular product times by the cost of either Cl or LCL. Next insurance is going to be discussed. The insurance costs once again difference between CL and LCL. CL cargo insurance is 1.5% and 1.75% LCL of CIF. Since Conference Sea gets a 2% discount off of CIF that is the number that is used for all the CIF calculations. Once again the forecast had to be adjusted to what will probably actual so demand is multiplied by .9 of the 2% CIF price
  • 9. multiplied by they CL or LCL parentage calculations of 1.5% or 1.75%. The percentages included the losses and damages of the cargo. Refer to the chart below to view the insurance distribution costs. Insurance costs make Conference Insurance Insurance Insurance Sea CL LCL Total HDTV $63,507.31 $30,241.58 $93,748.88 Refrigerator $46,351.31 $22,072.05 $68,423.36 Washer/Dryer Combo $11,113.20 $5,292.00 $16,405.20 Z-Pad $339,994.46 $161,902.13 $501,896.59 up a good portion of the cost to ship the products across the ocean. Next to calculate the inventory carrying costs. It took more time to ship LCL good than CL. Shipping LCL goods it takes 34 days for a product to get from the factory and then to be unloaded at the port. CL shipments take more time it takes 41 days till the products reach the storage area at the port. With these long transit times the inventory carrying costs would be expected to be high but our findings did not have see that. The carrying cost Conference Inv Carry Inv Carry Sea Cost (CL) Cost (LCL) HDTV $93.77 $48.46 Refrigerator $26.37 $13.63 Washer/Dryer Combo $31.65 $16.36 Z-Pad $1,898.78 $981.30
  • 10. are computed by taking the transit time divided by the number of days in a year then multiplied by 28% which is the inventory carrying costs percentage of the products then multiplied by the volume being shipped. The budget is the difference between CIF 2% minus FOB price multiplied by the demand. The total costs are all the costs associated with the product added together. Conference FOB CIF 2% off Total Sea Price Price CIF Budget Cost HDTV $1,000.0 0 $1,300.0 0 $1,274.0 0 $1,300,815.0 0 $1,112,491.1 7 Refrigerator $450.00 $1,100.0 0 $1,078.0 0 $2,571,660.0 0 $2,602,474.6 3 Washer/Dry er Combo $550.00 $1,200.0 0 $1,176.0 0 $563,400.00 $525,963.20 Z-Pad $650.00 $825.00 $808.50 $6,347,925.0 0 $3,203,621.6 8 This is everything that is associated with Conference Sea. The next alternative that will be discussed is Non-Conference Sea. Non-Conference Sea is very similar to Conference Sea. There are a few distinct differences but for the most part it is identical. The split for CL and LCL is 90/10 and there is a discount of 15% for Non-Conference Sea. Non-Conference Sea also used different type of container instead of using the 40 FEU Non- Conference Sea uses, 20 FEU are used. They do not fit as much product by
  • 11. they are easier to unload and load so they are little bit more efficient. Cost of the freight has the same formula as Conference Sea just the 15% discount has to be included which the table below is demonstrating. The insurance costs are computed and are the same as Conference Non Conference Sea Cl LCL Total Freight Freight Freight HDTV $617,775.56 $108,682.74 $726,458.30 Refrigerator $1,894,641.84 $333,316.62 $2,227,958.46 Washer/Dryer Combo $347,004.00 $61,047.00 $408,051.00 Sea because the transit times are the same. Scheduled air is the next alternative being looked at which has unique characteristics. Scheduled air is quite different from the modes that have already been discussed. Scheduled air requires 3000 cubic feet of cargo every week if Megabox goes over the 3000 cubic feet then it has to go to the spot market for that quarter which charges a higher rate than the scheduled air rate. Scheduled
  • 12. air is based on a per quarter demand unlike the conference sea and non- conference sea which are on an annually basis. To get all of the quarter demands into a weekly form, the demands are divided by 13 since there are 13 weeks in a quarter. Below is showing how the quarters Scheduled Air Total Qtr1 Qrt2 Qtr3 Qtr 4 Freight HDTV 1682.3076 92 1892.5961 54 2803.8461 54 1016.3942 31 7395.1442 31 Refrigerato r 4984.6153 85 6230.7692 31 7476.9230 77 3987.6923 08 22680 Washer/Dry er Combo 415.38461 54 1038.4615 38 1246.1538 46 1453.8461 54 4153.8461 54 Z-Pad 830.76923 08 761.53846 15 934.61538 46 553.84615 38 3080.7692 31 are broken down. To compute the quarter demands are divided by 13 then multiplied by the shipment volume of 1 unit of product. Since we are limited to only 3000 cubic feet not all of the products can go by the scheduled air rate which is $20.50 per shipped cubic foot. Going out in the spot market the rate is 20% higher. The refrigerator and washer and dryer for the most part have to go at the 20% higher rate because they will not fit with the Z-pads and HDTV’s. The chart below shows the cost breakdown per
  • 13. Scheduled Air Qtr1 Cost Qrt2 Cost Qtr3 Cost Qtr 4 Cost HDTV $448,335.00 $504,376.88 $896,670.00 $270,869.06 Refrigerator $1,594,080.0 0 $1,992,600.0 0 $2,391,120.0 0 $1,275,264.0 0 Washer/Drye r Combo $110,700.00 $332,100.00 $398,520.00 $387,450.00 Z-Pad $221,400.00 $202,950.00 $249,075.00 $147,600.00 quarter, the areas in blue are being shipped in the spot market because including them will exceed the 3000 cubic feet. Z-pad and HDTV are picked first to go because they are more expensive and more likely to get damaged in transit. The inventory carrying costs for scheduled air is still the 28% but the number of days in transit is 7.5 divided by 365 then multiplied by the total freight being shipped. The insurance is a little bit more Scheduled Air Total Inv Carry Freight Cost HDTV 7395.144231 $42.55 Refrigerator 22680 $130.49 Washer/Dryer Combo 4153.846154 $23.90 Z-Pad 3080.769231 $17.72
  • 14. complicated in computing than the other alternatives. The cargo insurance is 1% of the CIP value plus 10%. Cargo insurance is more expensive for air because the mode it is traveling on and there is a limited amount of space on every aircraft. Scheduled Air Insurance HDTV $201,887.44 Refrigerator $523,908.00 Washer/Dryer Combo $104,676.92 Z-Pad $53,374.33 The budget for scheduled air is the difference of CIP and FOB multiplied by the demand. The washer/dryer and refrigerator went over budget and they are more bulky so it does not make since to ship them by air. The last alternative is contract air. For contract air Megabox is looking at signing a contract that reserves 4000 cubic feet of space and can fill that space in any way we please if it is not filled Megabox still pays for the space. The z-pad and the HDTV take up the bulk of the space and then the washer and dryer combo. The insurance is computed the same way as scheduled air Con trac t Air
  • 17. 25.0 0 21.6 8 03.3 2 50.0 0 59.2 9 90.7 1 Sch edul ed Air Con trac t Air HDT V Tota l Tota l Refr iger ator Bud get Cost Diffe renc e Diffe renc e Bud get Cost Diffe renc e Was her/ Dry er Co mbo $1,4 24,2 50.0 0 $2,6 09,9 98.1 1 ($1,1 85,7 48.1 1) $51 7,92 6.79 $1,4 24,2 50.0 0 $2,1 77,4 24.0 8 ($75 3,17 4.08) Z- Pad $2,6 61,7 50.0 0 $8,4 19,2 29.9 9 ($5,7 57,4 79.9 9) $33 9,22 6.22 $2,6 61,7 50.0 0 $6,0 94,8 76.4 9 ($3,4 33,1 26.4 9)
  • 18. $58 5,00 0.00 $1,4 63,0 36.2 1 ($87 8,03 6.21) $14 3,13 9.00 $58 5,00 0.00 $1,1 32,9 50.8 2 ($54 7,95 0.82) $7,0 08,7 50.0 0 $1,1 98,2 82.9 2 $5,8 10,4 67.0 8 $5,4 23,5 90.7 1 $7,0 08,7 50.0 0 $1,8 78,6 70.8 0 $5,1 30,0 79.2 0 cargo. The budget and total cost is the same as scheduled air the high value items will more likely be the items to go by air and they washer dry and refrigerator will use a different type of mode. 5.Recommendations: Conferenc e Sea Non- Conferen ce Sea Total Total Budget Cost Difference Budget Cost Differenc e HDTV $1,300,81 5.00 $1,112,49 1.17 $188,323. 83 $1,424,2 50.00 $906,323. 21 $517,926. 79
  • 19. Refrigera tor $2,571,66 0.00 $2,602,47 4.63 ($30,814.6 3) $2,661,7 50.00 $2,322,52 3.78 $339,226. 22 Washer/ Dryer Combo $563,400. 00 $525,963. 20 $37,436.8 0 $585,000 .00 $441,861. 00 $143,139. 00 Z-Pad $6,347,92 5.00 $3,203,62 1.68 $3,144,30 3.32 $7,008,7 50.00 $1,585,15 9.29 $5,423,59 0.71 Schedul ed Air Contract Air HDTV Total Total Refrige rator Budget Cost Differenc e Differen ce Budget Cost Differen ce Washer /Dryer Combo $1,424,2 50.00 $2,609,9 98.11 ($1,185,7 48.11) $517,92 6.79 $1,424,2 50.00 $2,177,4 24.08 ($753,1 74.08) Z-Pad $2,661,7 50.00 $8,419,2 29.99 ($5,757,4 79.99) $339,22 6.22 $2,661,7 50.00 $6,094,8 76.49 ($3,433, 126.49) $585,00 0.00 $1,463,0 36.21 ($878,03 6.21) $143,13 9.00 $585,00 0.00 $1,132,9 50.82 ($547,9 50.82) $7,008,7 50.00 $1,198,2 82.92 $5,810,4 67.08 $5,423,5 90.71 $7,008,7 50.00 $1,878,6 70.80 $5,130, 079.20
  • 20. As we calculated the budget and total cost for each mode of transportation beside it we stated the difference between the two to determine if it were in budge or not. Zpads and HDTVS were in budget for all modes, but are very expensive goods, and are needed to be shipped in the fastest way so we placed them accordingly. Washer/Dryer- We recommend Megabox ships washers/dryers through Conference Sea for many reasons. First, washers and dryers can only be transported through Conference Sea, and Non-conference Sea because they do not fit in Scheduled and Contract air budgets. This is because washers and dryers have high cubic volume which causes them to go over budget when shipping through air. Also since they are low value, bulk commodity goods and are not in high demand compared to HDTV’s and Zpads by the customers, it would best to ship them through Conference Sea. Since this mode of transportation separated CL and LCL (because the sea containers are usually 20-40 ft) it would be best to ship washers and dryers through this mode of transportation. Lastly since washers and dryers have the lost insurance cost (which could also be detrimental because they have the highest loss and damage), CL shipments are less expensive than LCL shipments we would put 70% CL and 30% LCL so we can have the greatest of savings.
  • 21. Refrigerators- According to our calculations refrigerators can only be transported through Non-conference Sea, because it has the inherent advantage in capacity, and carries low value bulk commodities. Since refrigerators have the highest cubic ft it causes them to go over budget/ split in majority of the modes. Second since CL shipments are less expensive than LCL shipments and Non-conference Sea has a 90/30 ratio having 20% greater savings than Non-conference Sea, there is a great amount of savings when it comes to transporting refrigerators. HDTV’S - Although HDTV’S appear not to be in scheduled air’s budget according to our calculations they are indeed supposed to be transported through scheduled or contract air. This is because HDTV’S are high value electronics which are usually transported through air because they have the highest transit time. Also HDTV’s are in high demand by customers and would lose Mega box a lot of money and customer loyalty if shipped through conference and non- conference sea. Since inventory carrying cost and insurance is the same for scheduled and contract air we must have calculated total QTR wrong even after trying several different methods to make fit HDTV’s in scheduled and contract airs budget. Zpads- Lastly Zpads are high value items it would be best to transport them through scheduled air to prevent it from loss and damage, and to achieve the best customer satisfaction because it has the fastest transit time. These products high insurance costs, and low inventory carrying do not prevent them from being out of budget for scheduled and contract air. Scheduled air provides greater savings in the long run when transporting these two electronics even though they
  • 22. have high insurance costs (because they’re high value items). Lastly shipping these products by air will ensure they customer they will get to their final destination in the fastest/ safest way there is