private sector in DRR

1. METHODOLOGY FRAMEWORK
Scoping study on optimizing private sector
engagement within a “whole of society
approach” to building and strengthening
resilience in Indonesia

2. Research
objectives
1. Understand
potential for
collaboration
between different
stakeholders
working in DRR and
resilience, and with
private sector
through national
and regional
networks.
2. Identify potential
work that needs to
be prioritized to
increase and
strengthen private
sector engagement
in DRR and
resilience efforts in
Indonesia.
Data collecting
technique
Data analysis
technique
Result
presentation
technique
Mind mapping
analysis
Content analysis
Secondary data
compiling
Indepth
interview
FGD
Venn diagram
analysis
Quantification
of qualitative
Comparative
table
Simple pointer
Interview quote
Chart
Case study

3. Sampling Method
• Purposive sampling
• Category by group of informant
– Private sectors
– National government
– DKI Jakarta government
– Civil societies
– University/Academia
– Beneficiaries community

4. Private Sector Informants
No Industrial Origin
Share to
Indonesia
GDP
Share to DKI
Jakarta’s GDRP
Number of
Informants
(by proportion)
Informant
Business Size
Examples
1 Agriculture 15,29% 0,10% 1 NC PTPN
2 Mining/Quarrying 11,16% 0,43% 1 NC Pertamina
3 Manufacturing Industry 24,80% 15,73% 3 NC & MNC Sritex, Astra, Indomobil
4 Electricity, Gas & Water
Supply
0,76% 1,03% 1 NC PGN or Palyja
5 Construction 10,25% 11,42% 2 NC Wika, Adhi Karya
6 Trade,Hotel &
Restaurant
13,69% 20,69% 4 SMEs, NC,
MNC
PD Pasar Jaya, Hotel X,
Restoran Y
7 Transportation
& Communication
6,56% 10,17% 2 SMEs & NC Kopaja, Telkomsel
8 Financial, Real Estate &
Business Services
7,24% 27,75% 5 SMEs, NC,
MNC
Adira finance, Agung
podomoro, Citra -land group
9 Services 10,24% 12,67% 2 SMEs & NC Securicor, OB supplier, building
maintenance
TOTAL 21

5. Non Private Sector Informants
NO
Category of
informant
The informant
Number of
informant
1 National government
Director of DRR, BNPB 1
Ministry of Trade & Industry 1
Ministry of Environment 1
Ministry of Social 1
Ministry of Finance 1
Ministry of Cooperative, SME 1
Bappenas 1
2 Jakarta government
Head of DRR, BPBD 1
Agency for SMEs 1
Agency for industry & trade 1
3 Civil society
Jakarta DRR forum 1
Jakarta Chamber of trade 1
Jakarta CSR forum 1
National platform on DRR 1
Academician, research center 2
4
Beneficiaries
community
CSR assisted with DRR 1
CSR assisted without DRR 1

6. Secondary data compiling
• National policy/regulation about disaster
management
• National plan of action for DRR
• Jakarta plan on disaster management
• Related provincial level regulation
• National policy/regulation about private
sector
• National policy/regulation about labour
• Reports on similar study

7. FGD
• Techniques:
– Conservative FGD
– Using participatory tools (optional, due to time
availability)
• Venn diagram
• Scenario planning
• Quantification assesment
• Number of FGDs  6 sessions:
1. MNC, AmCham (
2. SMEs (trade, hotel, restaurant, services)
3. National government (BNPB, etc)
4. DKI Jakarta government (BPBD, etc)
5. DRR forum, CSR forum, academician
6. Beneficiaries communities

8. Key question (alternatives)
• Risk issues
– Risk awareness
– Risk analysis
– Risk management
• Bussiness capacity
– Man
– Money
– Machine
– Methods
– Material
• Resiliency (Norris, 2008)
– Robustness
– Redundancy
– Rapidity
• Common gap
– Policy
– Coordination
– Potential work
– Initiatives
– Bussiness interest

9. Analytical framework
Study
assumption
Field
expectation
Excisting
condition

10. Conceptual Framework
Engagement Strategy
Disaster Risk
Reduction
Resiliency
Bussiness Process
CSR
Private Sectors

11. Data analysis technique
• Content or Discourse analysis  investigates the
use of language within a social context (Carey,
2009: 140)
• Mind mapping analysis  bridging the gap
between thinking and writing, to assemble &
refine the ideas (Buzan, 1993: 13)
• Quantification assesment  valuing a
qualitative situation through FGD process
• Venn diagram analysis  elaborate the
stakeholders roles in 2 dimensions: influence &
distance

12. Comparative table of study result
Actors
Action
Policy Coordination Communication Capacity Incentive
Government -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Business Sector -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Civil Societies:
• Forum
• University
• Beneficieries
community
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Gap analysis -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Recommendation -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

13. Venn diagram technique
• A specific tools to get constelation aspect
among stake holder
• Specific issue: group influence (size of circle)
and the social distance (position of circle)
• Example:
Chamber of
trade
DRR in Private
sector
DRR forum
BPBD
CSR forum
Jkt agency
for trade

14. Scenario planning
• A tools to get common awareness for future in
various scenario: worst, normal & best
• Example:
No Future Aspects Worst Scenario Normal Scenario Best Scenario
1 Policy (to be discuss) (to be discuss) (to be discuss)
2 Coordination (to be discuss) (to be discuss) (to be discuss)
3 Capacity (to be discuss) (to be discuss) (to be discuss)
4 Communication (to be discuss) (to be discuss) (to be discuss)
5 Etc (to be discuss) (to be discuss) (to be discuss)

15. Quantification assessment
• A tools for group assesment on internal group
performance.
• Quantifying a qualitative situation based on
group discussion  determining the grade.
• Example:
No Performance
Aspects
Beginner
(0 – 1)
Grow up
(1,1 – 2)
Develop
(2,1 – 3)
Establish
(3,1 – 4)
Grade
1 Coordination No
coordination
Coordination
only in
emergency
respons, without
contingency plan
Coordination
in DRR
Coordination in
DM with clear
contingency
plan
(to be
discuss)
2 Capacity Lack of
capacity
Non standardize
capacity
Un-organize
capacity
Standardize and
organize
capacity
(to be
discuss)
3 etc (to be
describe)
(to be describe)
(to be
describe)
(to be describe)

16. GAP ANALYSIS
Strategy Formulation  Gov’t perspective
Start
End
Goverment
Private Sector
Policy documents
Comunicatin
g risk issues?
Coordinating
risk issues?
Incentive for
resilience initiatives
PSE in DRR
Policy
Setting CSR
Resilience
problems
Yes
Yes
No
Strengthening
internal capacity
Enhancing external
resources networking
No
DRR
practices
Resilience
capacity
Stakeholders
collaboration
Prioritized
potential work
Coordination
Policy
Incentive
Capacity
Communication

17. GAP ANALYSIS
Strategy Formulation  PS perspective
Start
End
Private Sectors
Government
Common bussiness
process
Experiencing
internal
hazards?
Experiencing
impact of
external
hazards?
Financial & phisycal
loss
PSE in DRR
PSE CSR
Resilience
setting
Yes
Yes
No
Strengthening
internal capacity
Enhancing external
resources networking
No
DRR
practices
DRR
policies
Stakeholders
collaboration
Prioritized
potential work
Coordination
Policy
Incentive
Capacity
Communication