SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 66
Dating Fossils
 and Rocks
 Carbon-14 dating
 Radioisotope dating
 The Biblical age of the earth
The Atom
   Fundamental unit of matter
   Made up of components called subatomic
    particles
       Proton (positive charge)
       Neutron (no electrical charge)
       Electron (negative charge)


                   Nucleus
                Electron
 Carbon has unique properties that are
  essential for life on earth.
 Familiar to us as:
    1.   the black substance in charred wood,
    2.   as diamonds,
    3.   and the graphite in ‘lead’ pencils,
   also
 carbon comes in several forms, or isotopes.
 One rare form has atoms that are 14 times as
  heavy as hydrogen atoms:
    Carbon-14 is also referred to as:
    C-14
    Carbon-14
14

    C
    Radiocarbon
     Types   of carbon (isotopes)
                              Atomic mass
      9                 14               16
      6
        C                6
                           C                6
                                              C
                             Atomic number
Atomic Mass
 The atomic mass (ma) is the mass of
  an atom at rest, most often expressed
  in unified atomic mass units.
 The atomic mass may be considered
  to be the total mass of protons,
  neutrons and electrons in a single
  atom (when the atom is motionless).
Atomic Number
 The atomic number (also known as the proton
  number) is the number of protons found in the
  nucleus of an atom.
 It is traditionally represented by the symbol
  Z.
 The atomic number uniquely identifies a
  chemical element.
 In an atom of neutral charge, the number of
  electrons also equals the atomic number.
 The atomic number is closely related to the
  mass number, which is the number of protons
  and neutrons in the nucleus of an atom.
 The mass number defines the isotope of the
  element and often comes after the name of the
  element, e.g. carbon-14 (used in carbon
  dating).
What is Radioactive Decay?
   The nucleus of an atom changes into a new
    element
         The proton number (atomic number) must
          change
         A neutron changes into a proton
              14             14
                6
                  C            7
                                 N
   Carbon-14 is made when cosmic rays knock
    neutrons out of atomic nuclei in the upper
    atmosphere.
   These displaced neutrons, now moving fast, hit
    ordinary nitrogen (14N) at lower altitudes,
    converting it into 14C.
   Unlike common carbon (12C), 14C is unstable and
    slowly decays, changing it back to nitrogen and
    releasing energy.
   This instability makes it radioactive.
   Ordinary carbon (12C) is found in the carbon
    dioxide (CO2) in the air, which is taken up by
    plants, which in turn are eaten by animals.
   So a bone, or a leaf or a tree, or even a piece of
    wooden furniture, contains carbon.
   When the 14C has been formed, like ordinary
    carbon (12C), it combines with oxygen to give
    carbon dioxide (14CO2), and so it also gets cycled
    through the cells of plants and animals.
How C-14 is Produced
    Cosmic Rays
     (radiation)

                   Forms C-14   C-14 combines with
                                oxygen to form carbon
Collision with
atmosphere (N14)                dioxide (CO2)
 We can take a sample of air, count how many
  12C atoms there are for every 14C atom, and
  calculate the 14C/12C ratio.
 Because 14C is so well mixed up with 12C,
  we expect to find that this ratio is the same if
  we sample a leaf from a tree, or a part of your
  body.
How the Carbon Dating Clock
                   Works
 Once a plant or animal dies the clock starts
 The plant or animal no longer takes in C-14
 The C-14 present in the plant or animal begins
  to decay


 No more C-                        C-14 continues
  14 intake                           to decay
   In living things, although 14C atoms are constantly
    changing back to 14N, they are still exchanging
    carbon with their surroundings, so the mixture
    remains about the same as in the atmosphere.
   However, as soon as a plant or animal dies, the 14C
    atoms which decay are no longer replaced, so the
    amount of 14C in that once-living thing decreases
    as time goes on.
   In other words, the 14C/12C ratio gets smaller.
 So, we have a ‘clock’ which starts ticking the
  moment something dies.
 Obviously, this works only for things which
  were once living.
 It cannot be used to date volcanic rocks, for
  example.
 The rate of decay of 14C is such that half of
  an amount will convert back to 14N in 5,730
  years (plus or minus 40 years).
 This is the ‘half-life.’
 So, in two half-lives, or 11,460 years, only
  one-quarter will be left.
Carbon-14 Life Cycle

Cosmic radiation


  14               14               14
   7
     N              6
                      C              7
                                       N

                        5,730 year half-life
   Thus, if the amount of 14C relative to 12C in a
    sample is one-quarter of that in living organisms at
    present, then it has a theoretical age of 11,460
    years.
   Anything over about 50,000 years old, should
    theoretically have no detectable 14C left.
   That is why radiocarbon dating cannot give
    millions of years.
   In fact, if a sample contains 14C, it is good
    evidence that it is not millions of years old.
 However, things are not quite so simple.
 First, plants discriminate against carbon
  dioxide containing 14C.
 That is, they take up less than would be
  expected and so they test older than they
  really are.
 Furthermore, different types of plants
  discriminate differently.
 This also has to be corrected for.
   Second, the ratio of 14C/12C in the atmosphere has
    not been constant—for example, it was higher
    before the industrial era when the massive burning
    of fossil fuels released a lot of carbon dioxide that
    was depleted in 14C.
   This would make things which died at that time
    appear older in terms of carbon dating.
   Then there was a rise in 14CO2 with the advent of
    atmospheric testing of atomic bombs in the 1950s.
   This would make things carbon-dated from that
    time appear younger than their true age.
 Measurement of 14C in historically dated
  objects (e.g., seeds in the graves of
  historically dated tombs) enables the level of
  14C in the atmosphere at that time to be
  estimated, and so partial calibration of the
  ‘clock’ is possible.
 Accordingly, carbon dating carefully applied
  to items from historical times can be useful.
 However, even with such historical
  calibration, archaeologists do not regard 14C
  dates as absolute because of frequent
  anomalies.
 They rely more on dating methods that link
  into historical records.
 Outside the range of recorded history,
  calibration of the 14C clock is not possible.
Carbon-14 Dating
 Used only on organic material
 Cannot be used to date rocks
 Maximum age limit about 60,000
  years
Quantity of C-14 in a Fossil
The C-14 dating method relies on measuring
the amount of C-14 in the fossil
   If there is a lot of C-14 remaining in the fossil,
    we assume it has not been dead very long
   If there is very little C-14 remaining in the fossil
    we assume most of it has decayed and the animal
    lived a long time ago (i.e. 30,000 or more years)
What Do We Need to Know?
          We need to know two things
1.    How fast C-14 decays (measured in half-lives
      - this is known: 5,730 years)
2.    The starting amount of C-14 in the fossil

                 We know number 1
     How can we know how much C-14 was in an
             organism 5,000 years ago?
Calculating the Starting Amount
             of C-14
   The dating method relies on measuring the
    ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14 in the
    sample
   The ratio today in the atmosphere is 1-
    trillion to 1
Determining the Age from the C-
           12/C-14 Ratio
Amount of       Amount of       Ratio      Years    # Half-lives
stable C-12    unstable C-14               Dead
100 Trillion      100          1-T to 1        0          0
100 Trillion       50          2-T to 1     5,730         1
100 Trillion       25          4-T to 1    11,460         2
100 Trillion       12.5        8-T to 1    17,190         3
100 Trillion        6          16-T to 1   22,920         4
100 Trillion        3          32-T to 1   28,650         5

        Are there any assumptions in this process?
The Underlying Assumption
   Has the ratio of C-12 to C-14 in the
   atmosphere always been the same?
If YES, then the C-14 dating is valid for up to
60,000 years
If NO, then we have no valid way of knowing the
starting amount of C-14 and dates will be invalid

      30,000 years to reach equilibrium
Dr. William Libby
Richard, Milton, Shattering the Myths of Darwinism,
1997, p. 32. (W. F. Libby, Radiocarbon Dating, 1955)

“He found a considerable discrepancy in his
measurements indicating that, apparently,
radiocarbon was being created in the
atmosphere somewhere around 25 percent faster
than it was becoming extinct. Since this result
was inexplicable by any conventional scientific
means, Libby put the discrepancy down to
experimental error.”
Experiments on Equilibrium

“During the 1960s, Libby’s experiments
were repeated by chemists… The new
experiments, though, revealed that the
discrepancy observed by Libby was not
merely an experimental error – it did exist.”
Richard, Milton, Shattering the Myths of Darwinism,
1997, p. 32.
Experiments on Equilibrium

Richard Lingenfelter, “Production of C-14 by cosmic
ray neutrons”, Review of Geophysics, 1963, p.51.

 “There is strong indication, despite the
 large errors, that the present natural
 production rate exceeds the natural
 decay rate by as much as 25 percent.”
New Techniques Show Young
          Dates
Walter Brown (Ph.D. Mechanical Engineering and
Professor of Physics), In the Beginning, 2001, p. 245.

“The new atomic accelerator technique has
consistently detected at least small amounts of
carbon-14 in every specimen – even materials
that evolutionists claim are millions of years old,
such as coal…
In one study of eleven sets of ancient human
bones, all were dated at about 5,000 radiocarbon
years or less.”
 The amount of cosmic rays penetrating the
  earth’s atmosphere affects the amount of 14C
  produced and therefore dating the system.
 The amount of cosmic rays reaching the earth
  varies with the sun’s activity, and with the
  earth's passage through magnetic clouds as
  the solar system travels around the Milky
  Way galaxy.
 A stronger magnetic field deflects more
  cosmic rays away from the earth.
 Overall, the energy of the earth’s magnetic
  field has been decreasing, so more 14C is
  being produced now, than in the past.
 This will make old things look older than they
  really are.
   Also, the Genesis flood would have greatly upset the
    carbon balance.
   The flood buried a huge amount of carbon, which became
    coal, oil, etc., lowering the total 12C in the biosphere
    (including the atmosphere—plants regrowing after the
    flood absorb CO2, which is not replaced by the decay of
    the buried vegetation).
   Total 14C is also proportionately lowered at this time, but
    whereas no terrestrial process generates any more 12C,
    14C is continually being produced, and at a rate which
    does not depend on carbon levels (it comes from nitrogen).
 Therefore, the 14C/12C ratio in
  plants/animals/the atmosphere before the
  flood had to be lower than what it is now.
 Unless this effect (which is additional to the
  magnetic field issue just discussed) were
  corrected for, carbon dating of fossils formed
  in the flood would give ages much older than
  the true ages.
The   key assumption has been shown to be false
(equilibrium)

Carbon-14   dating is a reliable dating method for less
than 3,000 years and not the claimed 60,000 found in
many textbooks

   Carbon-14 dating is based on an assumption
Radioisotope
 Dating Methods
What are they and how do they operate?
    What is the basic perception?
       How accurate are they?
 Are there any hidden assumptions?
Education

Biology: Visualizing Life, Holt, Rinehart,
Winston, 1998, p.177.

  “Using radioactive dating, scientists
  have determined that the Earth is about
  4.5 billion years old, ancient enough for
  all species to have been formed through
  evolution.”
Education

National Association of Biology Teachers
(NABT), 1995 Position Statements.

 “Radiometric and other dating
 techniques, when used properly, are
 highly accurate means of establishing
 dates in the history of the planet and in
 the history of life.”
 There are various other radiometric dating
  methods used today to give ages of millions
  or billions of years for rocks.
 These techniques, unlike carbon dating,
  mostly use the relative concentrations of
  parent and daughter products in radioactive
  decay chains.
Understanding Assumptions


For example, potassium-40 decays to argon-40;
uranium-238 decays to lead-206 via other elements
like radium; uranium-235 decays to lead-207



   Uranium         Decay           Lead

  Potassium         Decay         Argon
 The isotope concentrations can be measured
  very accurately, but isotope concentrations
  are not dates.
 To derive ages from such measurements,
  unprovable assumptions have to be made
  such as:
1.   The starting conditions are known (for
     example, that there was no daughter isotope
     present at the start, or that we know how
     much was there).
2.   Decay rates have always been constant.
3.   Systems were closed or isolated so that no
     parent or daughter isotopes were lost or
     added.
   These techniques are applied to igneous
    rocks, and are normally seen as giving the
    time since solidification.
Hour Glass Example
Hour Glass Example




Can you calculate how long you were outside?
Examples of Dating
   Sunset Crater, Northern Arizona
       Potassium-argon: 200,000+
       Reality: AD 1065
   Lava flows at Mt. Ngaurhoe, New Zealand
       Potassium-argon: 275,000
       Reality: 1949, 1954, 1975
   Hualalai basalt, Hawaii
       Potassium-argon: 1.4 – 22 million
       Reality: AD 1801
   Mt. Etna basalt, Sicily
       Potassium-argon: 140,000 – 350,000
       Reality: 1972
Examples of Dating

 Diamonds from Zaire: 6 billion years old!
 Mount St. Helens rocks 300,000 years old!
Assumptions and Dating

 Assumption     of starting amounts of
  elements
 Assumption of steady decay rate
 Assumption of a closed system

    If you base your theory on a wrong
assumption, all your work can be correct, but
          the result will be wrong.
Scientific Evidences for a Young
              Earth
    Rapid disintegration of comets
    Sediment on the ocean floor
    Decay of the Earth’s magnetic field
    Carbon-14 ratio in the atmosphere
    Helium in the Earth’s atmosphere
    Radiohalos for polonium in granites
    Population statistics
    Recession of the moon
Views on Creation

   Literal 6-day creation
   Gap theory
   Day-Age Theory
   Progressive creation

             Which one is correct?
              How can we know?
Genesis Chapter 1

Charles Taylor (Ph.D. Linguistics/emphasis on Old
Testament Hebrew), “Linguistics, Genesis and
Evolution”, 1981.

“Contrary to what people think it’s not
impossible to know. Genesis chapter 1 was
written in the Hebrew language which is
consistent in using one structure for narrative
and quite a different one for poetry.”
The Creation Days
        Are the days of creation literal days?
   Meaning of ‘Yom’
   Yom with a number
   Evening and morning
   Genesis 1:14
   Exodus 20:11
   Words used to indicate time
   Narrative versus poetry (VSO or SVO)
       In the beginning created God the heavens… = VSO
   Genealogies (Gen 5, 1Chron 1, Luke 3)
The Creation Days

Professor James Barr, Professor of Hebrew at the
University of Oxford.

“Probably so far as I know, there is no professor of
Hebrew or Old Testament at any world-class
university who dares not believe that the writer(s)
of Gen. 1-11 intended to convey to their readers
the ideas that creation took place in a series of six
days which are the same as the days of 24 hours
we now experience…”
The Creation Days

Dr. Robert Cole (Ph.D. Semitic Languages), “A PhD
looks at the Genesis Days”

   “There is nothing in the Bible to obviate the
   idea that the days in Genesis were 24 hour
   type days.”
Language and the Meaning of
                        Day
 Charles Taylor (Ph.D. Linguistics/emphasis on Old
 Testament Hebrew), “Linguistics, Genesis and
 Evolution”, 1981
“A very important point that most people
overlook when it comes to word use, is that it is
impossible to use a word as a symbol or
figuratively unless it already has a literal
meaning.
The word ‘day’ cannot, in Hebrew or English, be
used in the abstract of symbolic sense unless it
already has a clearly understood literal
meaning.”
The Creation Days

“It is a fact that before the modern era,
nobody in the history of the church for over
three thousand years ever questioned the
chronology of the Bible, and only a tiny
handful ever questioned that the six days of
Genesis 1 were ordinary 24-hour-type days.”
James B. Jordan (D. Litt), Creation in Six
Days, p. 17.
Biblical Implications of an Old Earth
   Genesis chapter 1 requires scientific
    information to interpret
   There was death before sin
   The Genesis Flood was NOT a worldwide
    flood
   What does God’s “very good” mean in
    Genesis 1:31?
   It is not a Salvation issue, but…
     Authority of God’s Word … Jesus is the Creator
     Do we need the Old Testament?

   Creation is the foundation for the Gospel
       Why did Jesus die on the cross?
   What is happening in schools today?
     Attacks on the Bible
     Lack of respect by Christians for the Bible
     Evolution is being taught as a fact
     Evolution means materialism (No Creator)

   Evolution started in the Garden of Eden
Creation is the Foundation


Chuck Colson, How Now Shall We Live, 1999, p. 100.


 “Creation is the first element of the Christian
 worldview, the foundation on which
 everything else is built. It is the basis of
 human dignity, for our origin tells us who we
 are, why we are here, and how we should
 treat one another.”
Who Believes in a Six-Day Creation
   Kurt Wise                  Ph.D. Paleontology
   Steven A. Austin           Ph.D. Geology
   John Morris                Ph.D. Geology
   Elaine Kennedy             Ph.D. Geology
   Donald B. DeYoung          Ph.D. Physics
   Walter Brown               Ph.D. Mechanical Engineering
   Russell Humphreys          Ph.D. Physics
   Keith Wanser               Ph.D. Condensed Matter Physics
   Danny R. Faulkner          Ph.D. Astronomy
   Duane T. Gish              Ph.D. Biochemistry
   Ross S. Anderson           Ph.D. Biochemistry
   Lane P. Lester             Ph.D. Genetics
   Linda K. Walkup            Ph.D. Molecular Genetics
   Ray Bohlin                 Ph.D. Molecular Biology
   Gary E. Parker             Ph.D. Biology
   Jonathan Sarfati           Ph.D. Physical Chemistry
   Charles Taylor             Ph.D. Linguistics (O.T.)
   Robert Cole                Ph.D. Semitic Languages
   Steven Boyd                Ph.D Hebraic and Cognitive Studies
   Drs. John MacArthur, James Kennedy, David Jeremiah, Tim LaHaye
Belief in a Young Earth
Dr. Keith Wanser (Ph.D. Condensed Matter Physics),
Creation ex nihilo, 1999, p. 39. (Dr. Wanser works with
theoretical condensed matter physics and basic theories of
matter)

 “I am convinced there is far more
 evidence for a recent, six-day creation and
 a global Flood than there is for an old
 earth and evolution.”
Psalm 118:8
 It is better to trust in the Lord than to put
               confidence in man


                  John 17:17
Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth

More Related Content

What's hot

02 evidence of evolution fossils
02 evidence of evolution   fossils02 evidence of evolution   fossils
02 evidence of evolution fossils
mrtangextrahelp
 

What's hot (20)

02 evidence of evolution fossils
02 evidence of evolution   fossils02 evidence of evolution   fossils
02 evidence of evolution fossils
 
Cephalopods
CephalopodsCephalopods
Cephalopods
 
Cephalopoda
CephalopodaCephalopoda
Cephalopoda
 
Fossils
FossilsFossils
Fossils
 
Mass extinction
Mass extinctionMass extinction
Mass extinction
 
Uranium lead method of rock dating
Uranium lead method of rock datingUranium lead method of rock dating
Uranium lead method of rock dating
 
Major extinction events
Major extinction eventsMajor extinction events
Major extinction events
 
Evolution of hourse ppt iqra
Evolution of hourse ppt iqraEvolution of hourse ppt iqra
Evolution of hourse ppt iqra
 
Fossilization ppt
Fossilization pptFossilization ppt
Fossilization ppt
 
Paleontology, types & uses of fossils
Paleontology, types & uses of fossilsPaleontology, types & uses of fossils
Paleontology, types & uses of fossils
 
Species concepts 4
Species concepts 4Species concepts 4
Species concepts 4
 
Radiometric methods for age determination
Radiometric methods for age determinationRadiometric methods for age determination
Radiometric methods for age determination
 
Fossils and fossilisation
Fossils and fossilisationFossils and fossilisation
Fossils and fossilisation
 
Origin of chordata
Origin of chordataOrigin of chordata
Origin of chordata
 
Phylum echinodermata 2016
Phylum echinodermata 2016Phylum echinodermata 2016
Phylum echinodermata 2016
 
Phylum Echinodermata Presentation
Phylum Echinodermata PresentationPhylum Echinodermata Presentation
Phylum Echinodermata Presentation
 
Evolution of elephas in paleontology
Evolution of elephas in paleontologyEvolution of elephas in paleontology
Evolution of elephas in paleontology
 
Paleomagnetism
PaleomagnetismPaleomagnetism
Paleomagnetism
 
Fossilization
FossilizationFossilization
Fossilization
 
Study of diatoms
Study of diatomsStudy of diatoms
Study of diatoms
 

Viewers also liked (6)

Radiometric dating
Radiometric dating Radiometric dating
Radiometric dating
 
Radiometric dating
Radiometric datingRadiometric dating
Radiometric dating
 
The relative age of rocks
The relative age of rocksThe relative age of rocks
The relative age of rocks
 
Radiocarbon dating theoretical concepts & practical applications
Radiocarbon dating  theoretical concepts & practical applicationsRadiocarbon dating  theoretical concepts & practical applications
Radiocarbon dating theoretical concepts & practical applications
 
Ages of rocks 2013
Ages of rocks 2013Ages of rocks 2013
Ages of rocks 2013
 
Dating Fossils And Rocks
Dating Fossils And RocksDating Fossils And Rocks
Dating Fossils And Rocks
 

Similar to Dating fossils and rocks

Kuliah geokimia 6a
Kuliah geokimia 6aKuliah geokimia 6a
Kuliah geokimia 6a
Arham Bahar
 
Ppt 12.3 earth
Ppt 12.3 earthPpt 12.3 earth
Ppt 12.3 earth
Tamara
 
Radimatric dating112121123121242342134125125.ppt
Radimatric dating112121123121242342134125125.pptRadimatric dating112121123121242342134125125.ppt
Radimatric dating112121123121242342134125125.ppt
bszool006
 
Relevance of carbon 14 in soil sciences
Relevance of carbon 14 in soil sciencesRelevance of carbon 14 in soil sciences
Relevance of carbon 14 in soil sciences
ShubhamDurgude1
 

Similar to Dating fossils and rocks (20)

Carbn1pp4
Carbn1pp4Carbn1pp4
Carbn1pp4
 
Radiocarbon dating archeological age determination by Carbon 14
Radiocarbon dating archeological age determination by Carbon 14Radiocarbon dating archeological age determination by Carbon 14
Radiocarbon dating archeological age determination by Carbon 14
 
Carbon 14 Dating
Carbon 14 DatingCarbon 14 Dating
Carbon 14 Dating
 
Radiocarbon dating
Radiocarbon datingRadiocarbon dating
Radiocarbon dating
 
Kuliah geokimia 6a
Kuliah geokimia 6aKuliah geokimia 6a
Kuliah geokimia 6a
 
Is radioactive dating accurate
Is radioactive dating accurateIs radioactive dating accurate
Is radioactive dating accurate
 
Ppt 12.3 earth
Ppt 12.3 earthPpt 12.3 earth
Ppt 12.3 earth
 
Radimatric dating112121123121242342134125125.ppt
Radimatric dating112121123121242342134125125.pptRadimatric dating112121123121242342134125125.ppt
Radimatric dating112121123121242342134125125.ppt
 
CarbonDatingSp2001.ppt
CarbonDatingSp2001.pptCarbonDatingSp2001.ppt
CarbonDatingSp2001.ppt
 
Carbon Dating 2.pptx
Carbon Dating 2.pptxCarbon Dating 2.pptx
Carbon Dating 2.pptx
 
Relevance of carbon 14 in soil sciences
Relevance of carbon 14 in soil sciencesRelevance of carbon 14 in soil sciences
Relevance of carbon 14 in soil sciences
 
Carbon Dating-1.pptx
Carbon Dating-1.pptxCarbon Dating-1.pptx
Carbon Dating-1.pptx
 
Essay On Isotopes
Essay On IsotopesEssay On Isotopes
Essay On Isotopes
 
79035bb0 a6be-4cc1-8f52-b943b8d5af78 (1)
79035bb0 a6be-4cc1-8f52-b943b8d5af78 (1)79035bb0 a6be-4cc1-8f52-b943b8d5af78 (1)
79035bb0 a6be-4cc1-8f52-b943b8d5af78 (1)
 
Nuclear and Atomic Physics
Nuclear and Atomic PhysicsNuclear and Atomic Physics
Nuclear and Atomic Physics
 
#1 stable isotope deltas tiny yet robust signatures in nature
#1 stable isotope deltas tiny yet robust signatures in nature#1 stable isotope deltas tiny yet robust signatures in nature
#1 stable isotope deltas tiny yet robust signatures in nature
 
Radioactive isotopes by Tanishq Agarwal.
Radioactive isotopes by Tanishq Agarwal.Radioactive isotopes by Tanishq Agarwal.
Radioactive isotopes by Tanishq Agarwal.
 
Chapter 9
Chapter 9Chapter 9
Chapter 9
 
7.2 Half-Life
7.2 Half-Life7.2 Half-Life
7.2 Half-Life
 
Mind Blowing Facts About Carbon Atomic Number.pdf
Mind Blowing Facts About Carbon Atomic Number.pdfMind Blowing Facts About Carbon Atomic Number.pdf
Mind Blowing Facts About Carbon Atomic Number.pdf
 

More from ewaszolek

Jfk and the cold war
Jfk and the cold warJfk and the cold war
Jfk and the cold war
ewaszolek
 
The circuit
The circuit The circuit
The circuit
ewaszolek
 
To kill a mockingbird
To kill a mockingbirdTo kill a mockingbird
To kill a mockingbird
ewaszolek
 
P moder contemplit
P moder contemplitP moder contemplit
P moder contemplit
ewaszolek
 
Harlem renaissance
Harlem renaissanceHarlem renaissance
Harlem renaissance
ewaszolek
 
Fdr new-deal
Fdr new-dealFdr new-deal
Fdr new-deal
ewaszolek
 
Huck finnppt
Huck finnpptHuck finnppt
Huck finnppt
ewaszolek
 
Adventureshuckfinn
AdventureshuckfinnAdventureshuckfinn
Adventureshuckfinn
ewaszolek
 

More from ewaszolek (20)

The vietnamwar
The vietnamwarThe vietnamwar
The vietnamwar
 
Civil rights
Civil rightsCivil rights
Civil rights
 
Jfk and the cold war
Jfk and the cold warJfk and the cold war
Jfk and the cold war
 
The circuit
The circuit The circuit
The circuit
 
To kill a mockingbird
To kill a mockingbirdTo kill a mockingbird
To kill a mockingbird
 
Cold war
Cold warCold war
Cold war
 
Pomoart
PomoartPomoart
Pomoart
 
America wwii
America wwiiAmerica wwii
America wwii
 
P moder contemplit
P moder contemplitP moder contemplit
P moder contemplit
 
Harlem renaissance
Harlem renaissanceHarlem renaissance
Harlem renaissance
 
Fdr new-deal
Fdr new-dealFdr new-deal
Fdr new-deal
 
The jazzage
The jazzageThe jazzage
The jazzage
 
The rootsofprogressivism
The rootsofprogressivismThe rootsofprogressivism
The rootsofprogressivism
 
F. scott fitzgerald
F. scott fitzgeraldF. scott fitzgerald
F. scott fitzgerald
 
Ernest hemingway
Ernest hemingwayErnest hemingway
Ernest hemingway
 
Modernism
ModernismModernism
Modernism
 
Huck finnppt
Huck finnpptHuck finnppt
Huck finnppt
 
Pantoum
PantoumPantoum
Pantoum
 
Reconstruction
ReconstructionReconstruction
Reconstruction
 
Adventureshuckfinn
AdventureshuckfinnAdventureshuckfinn
Adventureshuckfinn
 

Dating fossils and rocks

  • 2.  Carbon-14 dating  Radioisotope dating  The Biblical age of the earth
  • 3. The Atom  Fundamental unit of matter  Made up of components called subatomic particles  Proton (positive charge)  Neutron (no electrical charge)  Electron (negative charge) Nucleus Electron
  • 4.  Carbon has unique properties that are essential for life on earth.  Familiar to us as: 1. the black substance in charred wood, 2. as diamonds, 3. and the graphite in ‘lead’ pencils,  also
  • 5.  carbon comes in several forms, or isotopes.  One rare form has atoms that are 14 times as heavy as hydrogen atoms:
  • 6. Carbon-14 is also referred to as:  C-14  Carbon-14 14  C  Radiocarbon  Types of carbon (isotopes) Atomic mass 9 14 16 6 C 6 C 6 C Atomic number
  • 7. Atomic Mass  The atomic mass (ma) is the mass of an atom at rest, most often expressed in unified atomic mass units.  The atomic mass may be considered to be the total mass of protons, neutrons and electrons in a single atom (when the atom is motionless).
  • 8. Atomic Number  The atomic number (also known as the proton number) is the number of protons found in the nucleus of an atom.  It is traditionally represented by the symbol Z.  The atomic number uniquely identifies a chemical element.
  • 9.  In an atom of neutral charge, the number of electrons also equals the atomic number.  The atomic number is closely related to the mass number, which is the number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus of an atom.  The mass number defines the isotope of the element and often comes after the name of the element, e.g. carbon-14 (used in carbon dating).
  • 10. What is Radioactive Decay?  The nucleus of an atom changes into a new element  The proton number (atomic number) must change  A neutron changes into a proton 14 14 6 C 7 N
  • 11. Carbon-14 is made when cosmic rays knock neutrons out of atomic nuclei in the upper atmosphere.  These displaced neutrons, now moving fast, hit ordinary nitrogen (14N) at lower altitudes, converting it into 14C.  Unlike common carbon (12C), 14C is unstable and slowly decays, changing it back to nitrogen and releasing energy.  This instability makes it radioactive.
  • 12. Ordinary carbon (12C) is found in the carbon dioxide (CO2) in the air, which is taken up by plants, which in turn are eaten by animals.  So a bone, or a leaf or a tree, or even a piece of wooden furniture, contains carbon.  When the 14C has been formed, like ordinary carbon (12C), it combines with oxygen to give carbon dioxide (14CO2), and so it also gets cycled through the cells of plants and animals.
  • 13. How C-14 is Produced Cosmic Rays (radiation) Forms C-14 C-14 combines with oxygen to form carbon Collision with atmosphere (N14) dioxide (CO2)
  • 14.  We can take a sample of air, count how many 12C atoms there are for every 14C atom, and calculate the 14C/12C ratio.  Because 14C is so well mixed up with 12C, we expect to find that this ratio is the same if we sample a leaf from a tree, or a part of your body.
  • 15. How the Carbon Dating Clock Works  Once a plant or animal dies the clock starts  The plant or animal no longer takes in C-14  The C-14 present in the plant or animal begins to decay No more C- C-14 continues 14 intake to decay
  • 16. In living things, although 14C atoms are constantly changing back to 14N, they are still exchanging carbon with their surroundings, so the mixture remains about the same as in the atmosphere.  However, as soon as a plant or animal dies, the 14C atoms which decay are no longer replaced, so the amount of 14C in that once-living thing decreases as time goes on.  In other words, the 14C/12C ratio gets smaller.
  • 17.  So, we have a ‘clock’ which starts ticking the moment something dies.  Obviously, this works only for things which were once living.  It cannot be used to date volcanic rocks, for example.
  • 18.  The rate of decay of 14C is such that half of an amount will convert back to 14N in 5,730 years (plus or minus 40 years).  This is the ‘half-life.’  So, in two half-lives, or 11,460 years, only one-quarter will be left.
  • 19. Carbon-14 Life Cycle Cosmic radiation 14 14 14 7 N 6 C 7 N 5,730 year half-life
  • 20. Thus, if the amount of 14C relative to 12C in a sample is one-quarter of that in living organisms at present, then it has a theoretical age of 11,460 years.  Anything over about 50,000 years old, should theoretically have no detectable 14C left.  That is why radiocarbon dating cannot give millions of years.  In fact, if a sample contains 14C, it is good evidence that it is not millions of years old.
  • 21.  However, things are not quite so simple.  First, plants discriminate against carbon dioxide containing 14C.  That is, they take up less than would be expected and so they test older than they really are.  Furthermore, different types of plants discriminate differently.  This also has to be corrected for.
  • 22. Second, the ratio of 14C/12C in the atmosphere has not been constant—for example, it was higher before the industrial era when the massive burning of fossil fuels released a lot of carbon dioxide that was depleted in 14C.  This would make things which died at that time appear older in terms of carbon dating.  Then there was a rise in 14CO2 with the advent of atmospheric testing of atomic bombs in the 1950s.  This would make things carbon-dated from that time appear younger than their true age.
  • 23.  Measurement of 14C in historically dated objects (e.g., seeds in the graves of historically dated tombs) enables the level of 14C in the atmosphere at that time to be estimated, and so partial calibration of the ‘clock’ is possible.  Accordingly, carbon dating carefully applied to items from historical times can be useful.
  • 24.  However, even with such historical calibration, archaeologists do not regard 14C dates as absolute because of frequent anomalies.  They rely more on dating methods that link into historical records.  Outside the range of recorded history, calibration of the 14C clock is not possible.
  • 25. Carbon-14 Dating  Used only on organic material  Cannot be used to date rocks  Maximum age limit about 60,000 years
  • 26. Quantity of C-14 in a Fossil The C-14 dating method relies on measuring the amount of C-14 in the fossil  If there is a lot of C-14 remaining in the fossil, we assume it has not been dead very long  If there is very little C-14 remaining in the fossil we assume most of it has decayed and the animal lived a long time ago (i.e. 30,000 or more years)
  • 27. What Do We Need to Know? We need to know two things 1. How fast C-14 decays (measured in half-lives - this is known: 5,730 years) 2. The starting amount of C-14 in the fossil We know number 1 How can we know how much C-14 was in an organism 5,000 years ago?
  • 28. Calculating the Starting Amount of C-14  The dating method relies on measuring the ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14 in the sample  The ratio today in the atmosphere is 1- trillion to 1
  • 29. Determining the Age from the C- 12/C-14 Ratio Amount of Amount of Ratio Years # Half-lives stable C-12 unstable C-14 Dead 100 Trillion 100 1-T to 1 0 0 100 Trillion 50 2-T to 1 5,730 1 100 Trillion 25 4-T to 1 11,460 2 100 Trillion 12.5 8-T to 1 17,190 3 100 Trillion 6 16-T to 1 22,920 4 100 Trillion 3 32-T to 1 28,650 5 Are there any assumptions in this process?
  • 30. The Underlying Assumption Has the ratio of C-12 to C-14 in the atmosphere always been the same? If YES, then the C-14 dating is valid for up to 60,000 years If NO, then we have no valid way of knowing the starting amount of C-14 and dates will be invalid 30,000 years to reach equilibrium
  • 31. Dr. William Libby Richard, Milton, Shattering the Myths of Darwinism, 1997, p. 32. (W. F. Libby, Radiocarbon Dating, 1955) “He found a considerable discrepancy in his measurements indicating that, apparently, radiocarbon was being created in the atmosphere somewhere around 25 percent faster than it was becoming extinct. Since this result was inexplicable by any conventional scientific means, Libby put the discrepancy down to experimental error.”
  • 32. Experiments on Equilibrium “During the 1960s, Libby’s experiments were repeated by chemists… The new experiments, though, revealed that the discrepancy observed by Libby was not merely an experimental error – it did exist.” Richard, Milton, Shattering the Myths of Darwinism, 1997, p. 32.
  • 33. Experiments on Equilibrium Richard Lingenfelter, “Production of C-14 by cosmic ray neutrons”, Review of Geophysics, 1963, p.51. “There is strong indication, despite the large errors, that the present natural production rate exceeds the natural decay rate by as much as 25 percent.”
  • 34. New Techniques Show Young Dates Walter Brown (Ph.D. Mechanical Engineering and Professor of Physics), In the Beginning, 2001, p. 245. “The new atomic accelerator technique has consistently detected at least small amounts of carbon-14 in every specimen – even materials that evolutionists claim are millions of years old, such as coal… In one study of eleven sets of ancient human bones, all were dated at about 5,000 radiocarbon years or less.”
  • 35.  The amount of cosmic rays penetrating the earth’s atmosphere affects the amount of 14C produced and therefore dating the system.  The amount of cosmic rays reaching the earth varies with the sun’s activity, and with the earth's passage through magnetic clouds as the solar system travels around the Milky Way galaxy.
  • 36.  A stronger magnetic field deflects more cosmic rays away from the earth.  Overall, the energy of the earth’s magnetic field has been decreasing, so more 14C is being produced now, than in the past.  This will make old things look older than they really are.
  • 37. Also, the Genesis flood would have greatly upset the carbon balance.  The flood buried a huge amount of carbon, which became coal, oil, etc., lowering the total 12C in the biosphere (including the atmosphere—plants regrowing after the flood absorb CO2, which is not replaced by the decay of the buried vegetation).  Total 14C is also proportionately lowered at this time, but whereas no terrestrial process generates any more 12C, 14C is continually being produced, and at a rate which does not depend on carbon levels (it comes from nitrogen).
  • 38.  Therefore, the 14C/12C ratio in plants/animals/the atmosphere before the flood had to be lower than what it is now.  Unless this effect (which is additional to the magnetic field issue just discussed) were corrected for, carbon dating of fossils formed in the flood would give ages much older than the true ages.
  • 39. The key assumption has been shown to be false (equilibrium) Carbon-14 dating is a reliable dating method for less than 3,000 years and not the claimed 60,000 found in many textbooks  Carbon-14 dating is based on an assumption
  • 40. Radioisotope Dating Methods What are they and how do they operate? What is the basic perception? How accurate are they? Are there any hidden assumptions?
  • 41. Education Biology: Visualizing Life, Holt, Rinehart, Winston, 1998, p.177. “Using radioactive dating, scientists have determined that the Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, ancient enough for all species to have been formed through evolution.”
  • 42. Education National Association of Biology Teachers (NABT), 1995 Position Statements. “Radiometric and other dating techniques, when used properly, are highly accurate means of establishing dates in the history of the planet and in the history of life.”
  • 43.  There are various other radiometric dating methods used today to give ages of millions or billions of years for rocks.  These techniques, unlike carbon dating, mostly use the relative concentrations of parent and daughter products in radioactive decay chains.
  • 44. Understanding Assumptions For example, potassium-40 decays to argon-40; uranium-238 decays to lead-206 via other elements like radium; uranium-235 decays to lead-207 Uranium Decay Lead Potassium Decay Argon
  • 45.  The isotope concentrations can be measured very accurately, but isotope concentrations are not dates.  To derive ages from such measurements, unprovable assumptions have to be made such as:
  • 46. 1. The starting conditions are known (for example, that there was no daughter isotope present at the start, or that we know how much was there). 2. Decay rates have always been constant. 3. Systems were closed or isolated so that no parent or daughter isotopes were lost or added.
  • 47. These techniques are applied to igneous rocks, and are normally seen as giving the time since solidification.
  • 49. Hour Glass Example Can you calculate how long you were outside?
  • 50. Examples of Dating  Sunset Crater, Northern Arizona  Potassium-argon: 200,000+  Reality: AD 1065  Lava flows at Mt. Ngaurhoe, New Zealand  Potassium-argon: 275,000  Reality: 1949, 1954, 1975  Hualalai basalt, Hawaii  Potassium-argon: 1.4 – 22 million  Reality: AD 1801  Mt. Etna basalt, Sicily  Potassium-argon: 140,000 – 350,000  Reality: 1972
  • 51. Examples of Dating  Diamonds from Zaire: 6 billion years old!  Mount St. Helens rocks 300,000 years old!
  • 52. Assumptions and Dating  Assumption of starting amounts of elements  Assumption of steady decay rate  Assumption of a closed system If you base your theory on a wrong assumption, all your work can be correct, but the result will be wrong.
  • 53. Scientific Evidences for a Young Earth  Rapid disintegration of comets  Sediment on the ocean floor  Decay of the Earth’s magnetic field  Carbon-14 ratio in the atmosphere  Helium in the Earth’s atmosphere  Radiohalos for polonium in granites  Population statistics  Recession of the moon
  • 54. Views on Creation  Literal 6-day creation  Gap theory  Day-Age Theory  Progressive creation Which one is correct? How can we know?
  • 55. Genesis Chapter 1 Charles Taylor (Ph.D. Linguistics/emphasis on Old Testament Hebrew), “Linguistics, Genesis and Evolution”, 1981. “Contrary to what people think it’s not impossible to know. Genesis chapter 1 was written in the Hebrew language which is consistent in using one structure for narrative and quite a different one for poetry.”
  • 56. The Creation Days Are the days of creation literal days?  Meaning of ‘Yom’  Yom with a number  Evening and morning  Genesis 1:14  Exodus 20:11  Words used to indicate time  Narrative versus poetry (VSO or SVO)  In the beginning created God the heavens… = VSO  Genealogies (Gen 5, 1Chron 1, Luke 3)
  • 57. The Creation Days Professor James Barr, Professor of Hebrew at the University of Oxford. “Probably so far as I know, there is no professor of Hebrew or Old Testament at any world-class university who dares not believe that the writer(s) of Gen. 1-11 intended to convey to their readers the ideas that creation took place in a series of six days which are the same as the days of 24 hours we now experience…”
  • 58. The Creation Days Dr. Robert Cole (Ph.D. Semitic Languages), “A PhD looks at the Genesis Days” “There is nothing in the Bible to obviate the idea that the days in Genesis were 24 hour type days.”
  • 59. Language and the Meaning of Day Charles Taylor (Ph.D. Linguistics/emphasis on Old Testament Hebrew), “Linguistics, Genesis and Evolution”, 1981 “A very important point that most people overlook when it comes to word use, is that it is impossible to use a word as a symbol or figuratively unless it already has a literal meaning. The word ‘day’ cannot, in Hebrew or English, be used in the abstract of symbolic sense unless it already has a clearly understood literal meaning.”
  • 60. The Creation Days “It is a fact that before the modern era, nobody in the history of the church for over three thousand years ever questioned the chronology of the Bible, and only a tiny handful ever questioned that the six days of Genesis 1 were ordinary 24-hour-type days.” James B. Jordan (D. Litt), Creation in Six Days, p. 17.
  • 61. Biblical Implications of an Old Earth  Genesis chapter 1 requires scientific information to interpret  There was death before sin  The Genesis Flood was NOT a worldwide flood  What does God’s “very good” mean in Genesis 1:31?
  • 62. It is not a Salvation issue, but…  Authority of God’s Word … Jesus is the Creator  Do we need the Old Testament?  Creation is the foundation for the Gospel  Why did Jesus die on the cross?  What is happening in schools today?  Attacks on the Bible  Lack of respect by Christians for the Bible  Evolution is being taught as a fact  Evolution means materialism (No Creator)  Evolution started in the Garden of Eden
  • 63. Creation is the Foundation Chuck Colson, How Now Shall We Live, 1999, p. 100. “Creation is the first element of the Christian worldview, the foundation on which everything else is built. It is the basis of human dignity, for our origin tells us who we are, why we are here, and how we should treat one another.”
  • 64. Who Believes in a Six-Day Creation  Kurt Wise Ph.D. Paleontology  Steven A. Austin Ph.D. Geology  John Morris Ph.D. Geology  Elaine Kennedy Ph.D. Geology  Donald B. DeYoung Ph.D. Physics  Walter Brown Ph.D. Mechanical Engineering  Russell Humphreys Ph.D. Physics  Keith Wanser Ph.D. Condensed Matter Physics  Danny R. Faulkner Ph.D. Astronomy  Duane T. Gish Ph.D. Biochemistry  Ross S. Anderson Ph.D. Biochemistry  Lane P. Lester Ph.D. Genetics  Linda K. Walkup Ph.D. Molecular Genetics  Ray Bohlin Ph.D. Molecular Biology  Gary E. Parker Ph.D. Biology  Jonathan Sarfati Ph.D. Physical Chemistry  Charles Taylor Ph.D. Linguistics (O.T.)  Robert Cole Ph.D. Semitic Languages  Steven Boyd Ph.D Hebraic and Cognitive Studies  Drs. John MacArthur, James Kennedy, David Jeremiah, Tim LaHaye
  • 65. Belief in a Young Earth Dr. Keith Wanser (Ph.D. Condensed Matter Physics), Creation ex nihilo, 1999, p. 39. (Dr. Wanser works with theoretical condensed matter physics and basic theories of matter) “I am convinced there is far more evidence for a recent, six-day creation and a global Flood than there is for an old earth and evolution.”
  • 66. Psalm 118:8 It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man John 17:17 Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth

Editor's Notes

  1. Apollo 11 brought back some moon rocks. The rocks were dated using 4 different methods. The range between the oldest and youngest date was almost 4-billion years. Apollo 16 brought back some moon rocks that were dated at 18-billion years. To fix the problem they subjected the rocks to acid to melt out the lead and then re-dated and got 4.5 billion years. (Science magazine Jan 30, 1973) Sunset Crater in n. Arizona is known to be a recent volcano. Indian artefacts and relics are found within the rocks formed by the eruption. The volcano last erupted some 900 years ago. Two lava flows have been dated giving ages of 210,000 and 230,000. Hualalai volcano in Hawaii Known to have erupted in 1800-1801 were dated with a variety of methods. 12 dates were taken which ranged from 140 million years to 2.96 billion years. The average date was 1.41 billion. There have been many explanations to explain these results away (as the lava rose, the older material from inside the earth rose with it, but they are unable to explain why such a variance in ages). If this is the explanation, then why could this not also be the case for other dates? This does not disprove radioisotope dating, but it does demonstrate the tremendous inconsistency in the interpretation of the method. The conventional K-Ar dating method was applied to the 1986 dacite flow from the new lava dome at Mount St. Helens, Washington. Porphyritic dacite which solidified on the surface of the lava dome in 1986 gives a whole rock K-Ar ‘age’ of 0.35 0.05 million years. Steven A. Austin, “Excess Argon within Mineral Concentrates from the New Dacite lava Dome at Mount St. Helens Volcano, 1996