SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 94
V
THE ROLE OF PET/CT
IN THE INITIAL STAGING AND
EVALUATION OF THERAPEUTIC
RESPONSE IN ASSESSMENT OF
EXTRANODAL NON-HODGKIN
LYMPHOMA
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
 Lymphoma are tumors of lymphoid tissue, represents
4% of all cancers.
 Lymphoma is generally divided into : Hodgkin’s
disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
(NHL).
 NHL is a multifocal disease which often presents
late with disseminated extranodal spread, it
accounts 62.4 % of all lymphomas.
Introduction
 The extra nodal involvements are compromising in
approximately 40% of patients.
 With the introduction PET/CT scanners, a combined
method of metabolic and morphologic imaging is
available.
AIM OF WORK
Aim of Work
 To evaluate the role the PET/CT in initial
diagnosis and staging of lymphoma.
 Assessment of therapeutic response.
 Interim follow up and assessment of
remissions/relapses.
 Highlighting the role of five-point scale
(Deauville criteria) to grade response of
therapy using PET-CT.
NON HODGKIN
LYMPHOMA
Non Hodgkin lymphoma
 NHL's include diffuse large B-cell
(31%), follicular (22%), marginal zone
or MALT (8%), peripheral T-cell (7-
15%), small lymphocyte B-cell (7%),
mantle cell (6%), and others (11%).
 Treatment for NHL is based on several
factors, including tumor grade.
Extranodal NHL
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise
in nodal and extranodal sites.
 Extranodal lymphoma may be:
 Originated in non-nodal tissue (primary ENL)
 Originated in nodal tissue and spread to adjacent
non-nodal tissue,
 Originated in nodal tissue and hematogenous
spread to extranodal sites (secondary ENL).
(Even-Sapir et al,
2007)
o
r
Extranodal NHL
 Most common extranodal sites in Non-
Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
 Spleen.
Extranodal NHL
 Most common extranodal sites in Non-
Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
 Waldeyer’s ring.
Extranodal NHL
 Most common extranodal sites in Non-
Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
 Lung and & pleura.
Extranodal NHL
 Most common extranodal sites in Non-
Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
 Bone
Extranodal NHL
 Most common extranodal sites in Non-
Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
 GIT.
Extranodal NHL
 Most common extranodal sites in Non-
Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
 Hepatic.
Extranodal NHL
 Most common extranodal sites in Non-
Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
 Orbit.
Extranodal NHL
 Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin
lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
Skin.
Extranodal NHL
 Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin
lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
Salivary gland.
Extranodal NHL
 Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin
lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
The thymus.
Extranodal NHL
 Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin
lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
 Central nervous system (CNS)
Extranodal NHL
 Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin
lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
 Peripheral nervous system.
Extranodal NHL
 Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin
lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
Breast.
Extranodal NHL
 Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin
lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
Testis.
Extranodal NHL
 Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin
lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
Genitourinary tract (GUT).
Extranodal NHL
 Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin
lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
Gall bladder.
Extranodal NHL
 Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin
lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:
Peritoneum
Ann Arbor Classification
Applicable to any stage:
A No B symptoms.
B Fever, nocturnal sweats, loss of more than 10% of body weight in
previous 6 months.
X Bulky disease: mediastinal widening >1/3 measured at the T5–6
level, or mass >10 cm.
E Involvement of a single extranodal site contiguous or next to the
known lymph node localization.
S Splenic involvement.
Physical Background and
Technical Aspects of PET/CT
PET is a functional imaging technique.
 Radiopharmaceuticals produced by labeling
metabolic markers such as glucose with positron
emitting radionuclides such as fluorine 18.
 Producing 18F-Fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose (FDG).
 Malignant cells show increased glucose
utilization.
 FDG is analogue to glucose , so they elicit high
uptake of FDG.
 FDG is ideal for tumor imaging as it allows
accurate and noninvasive differentiation of
benign from malignant abnormalities.
Physical Background and
Technical Aspects of PET/CT
Hardware of PET-CT Scanner consists of
three main components
CT scanner
PET scanner.
Patient bed
Technique of Whole-Body
PET/CT Imaging with 18F-FDG
Patient Preparation
 Fasting for 6 hours .
 Remove metallic items from the patient.
 Insert I.V. catheter .
 Check the blood glucose level.
 The patient is asked to void activity and
speech before scanning .
 Dosage Administration
 Inject 18F-FDG into the patient in a dosage of
0.22 mCi/kg “10-20 mCi (370 MBq; approximate dose to patient, 3-
5MBq/Kg) 18F-FDG 45–90 minutes before examination”
 Oral contrast agents are administered 40 to 60
minutes prior to CT scanning (usually mannitoal as
negative oral contrast).
 The patient waits 45-60 minutes after FDG
administration and is instructed to remain quiet
with minimal movement until the completion of
the PET/CT scan.
Technique of Whole-Body
PET/CT Imaging with 18F-FDG
Technique of Whole-Body
PET/CT Imaging with 18F-FDG
Advantages of PET/CT
PET demonstrates biological function
before anatomical changes take
place.
CT provides information about the
anatomy and morphology.
PET/CT combines anatomical
information from CT with functional
information from PET.
Applications for FDG-PET/CT in
NHL
 Staging
 Stage before any treatment started; one dose
of chemo may decrease uptake, causing
underestimation of stage
 Assessment for response to therapy and
tumor recurrence
 Differentiate scar from residual tumor
mass.
 Predict outcome.
Applications for FDG-PET/CT in
NHL
 FDG-PET/CT findings can result in
:
• Change in patient staging up to 44%
of patients (either up-stage or down-stage).
sensitive and specific than CT
imaging alone for staging and
restaging lymphoma
• Change in patient management in up
to 62%.
 Image interpretation:
Interpretation of the PET CT findings was
qualitative and semi-quantitative.
 The qualitative evaluation (visual) included
the description of all the hypermetabolic
lesions (activity > liver or blood pool).
 The semi-quantitative evaluation or SUV
bases evaluation was performed using the
maximum standardized uptake value
(SUVmax) in a region of interest located over
the hypermetabolic lesion.
Therapy Response Evaluation
 Evaluating response to therapy either
early assessment, after one to three
cycles of treatment, interim or after end of
treatment of the overall response.
 Usually performed approximately one
month after cessation of chemotherapy.
Therapy Response Evaluation
Patients and Methods
 Patients with pathologically proven NHL
were included.
 Patients performed one or more of the
following:
Initial PET/CT for staging
Interim PET/CT
End of treatment PET/CT
Follow up PET/CT exams to detect relapse.
 Study population 50 patients.
We classified the patients in our study into 4 groups;
Group I included 10 patients came for initial
staging by PET/CT exams.
Group II included 8 patients came for pre-
treatment staging, continued interim follow
up and end treatment assessment by
PET/CT exams.
Group III included only 22 patients whom
underwent interim PET/CT for response
assessment after mid treatment.
Group IV included 10 interim patients that ended
treatment and were seen in our institution
for end of treatment PET/CT for
relapse/response assessment.
Patients and Methods
 Most common therapeutic response
evaluation guideline in lymphoma was done
according to:International Workshop Criteria IWC (1999)
guidelines
Revised response criteria by international
harmonization project (IHP) (Cheson. et al,
2007)
Modified Deauville Criteria
‘‘PERCIST’’ — Positron Emission
tomography Response Criteria In Solid
Tumors.
The EORTC PET
Therapy Response Evaluation
CRITERION CR PR SD PD
IHP
• Any size/no
, if no
FDG
•Variable/un
known FDG,
LN must
regressed
to <= 1.5 cm
• Size  50%
SPD*
• No  LN/L/S
• PET+, variable
or regression
in previous
site
• Fails to
attain
CR,PR or
PD
•50% SPD*
•50% LN§
• New lesions >
1.5 cm
*Sum product of diameters, § Lymph
node
 Patients in our study were assessed using IHP
(Cheson, et al 2007) and correlated by modified
Deauville criteria.
I- Revised response criteria by international
harmonization project (IHP) (Cheson. et al,
2007).
Therapy Response Evaluation
II- Modified Deauville criteria.
Scor
e
PET/CT Scan Result
1 No uptake above background
2 Uptake at an initial site that is ≤ to mediastinum
3 Uptake at an initial site that is > mediastinum but ≤ to liver
4
Uptake at an initial site moderately > the liver at any site.
“Uptake > the maximum SUV in a large region of normal liver (Barrington. et al,
2014)”
5a Uptake at an initial site that is markedly > the liver
5b
Uptake at any new site that is markedly > the liver that is
possibly related to lymphoma
“uptake is 2 X to 3 X > the maximum SUV in the liver (Barrington. et al, 2014)”.
X New areas of uptake unlikely related to lymphoma
Therapy Response Evaluation
Assessment of treatment response by modified Deauville
criteria.
 Complete response (CR): scores 1, 2 or 3 together with
absence of FDG-avid bone marrow lesion(s) are
interpreted as complete metabolic response (CR),
irrespective of a persistent mass on CT
 Partial response (PR): a Deauville score of 4 or 5,
provided:
 Uptake is decreased compared with baseline and
 Absence of structural progression development on CT
 Stable disease (SD): also called no metabolic response: a
Deauville score of 4 or 5 without significant change in
FDG uptake from baseline.
 Progressive disease (PD): a Deauville score of 4 to 5
with increasing intensity compared to baseline or any
interim scan and/or any new FDG-avid focus consistent
Therapy Response Evaluation
I- Organ based analysis and
demographic features of all
studied groups
RESULTS
Characteristics
Patients group
(n= 50)
Age (yrs)
Range 20-78
Mean ± SD 51.47 ± 14.70
Gender
Female 16 (32%)
Male 34 (68%)
I- Organ based analysis and demographic
features of all studied groups
At time of presentation of patients in each group we found that
6 % presented stage II-S, 8% presented II-E, 10%
presented stage III-S, 26% presented III-E, 12% presented
III-SE and 38% presented stage IV.
Staging
Group Tot
al
no.
%
I II III IV
I-E 1 0 1 0 2 4%
II-S 1 0 2 0 3 6%
II-E 2 0 0 2 4 8%
III-S 0 0 3 2 5 10%
III-E 2 3 6 2 11 22%
III-
SE
1 2 1 2 6 12%
The different organ involvement
reported was:
Sites of extra-nodal disease Total number of patients Percent %
spleen 17 34
Bone marrow & osseous 15 30
liver 9 18
Pulmonary nodules 12 24
Renal 2 4
muscular 4 8
pleural 3 6
GIT 4 8
cutaneous 4 8
nasopharyngeal 4 8
salivary Gland 1 2
Tonsils 2 4
adrenal 2 4
thyroid 1 2
breast 1 2
High PET-CT
sensitivity 100%
with significant
P-value 0.0001.
Comparison between detection of lymph
nodes involvement by CT and PET CT
showed that :
100
0
100
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Percent
CT positive CT negative
PET CT positive PET CT negative
All patients in this study had PET-CT evidence of
metabolically active one or more lymph node groups,
while 42 patients had enlarged lymph nodes by CT.
PET/CT depicted avid sub-centimetric lymph nodes in
eight out of the 50 patients, that were normal sized LN in
high sensitivity of
PET-CT of about
100% with
high specificity of
about 82.5% and
significant P-
value 0.001
Comparison between detection of splenic
involvement by CT and PET CT showed
that :
100
0
20
82.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percent
CT positive CT negative
PET CT positive PET CT negative
Out of the 50 patients in our study groups, 17 patients had
evidence of splenic involvement (increased metabolic activity
of the spleen &/or splenic lesions) and 33 patients had no
splenic affection detected by PET-CT; while 10 patients only
showed splenic involvement by CT and 40 patients show no
splenic involvement by CT
Comparison between detection of bone
marrow involvement by CT and PET CT
showed that :
high sensitivity
of PET CT of
100%
with specificity of
74.5% and high
significant P-
value 0.006.
100
0
25.5
74.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Percent
CT positive CT negative
PET CT positive PET CT negative
Out of the 50 patients, 15 patients had evidence of
increased metabolic activity of the bone marrow &/or
osseous lesions detected by PET-CT while only three
patients showed osseous lesions by CT.
high sensitivity of
PET CT of 76.9%
with specificity of
56.8% and high
significant P-
value 0.037.
Comparison between detection of other
extranodal involvement by CT and PET CT
showed that :
76.9
23.1
43.2
56.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percent
CT positive CT negative
PET CT positive PET CT negative
Out of the 50 patients, 26 patients had evidence of
increased metabolic activity of other extranodal organs
detected by PET-CT while only 13 patients out of those
showed affection by CT.
100 100 100 100
25
82.5
74.5
64.9
87
58.8
20
50
50
97 100 100
84 86
76 74
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Percent
Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Accuracy
Lymph node Spleen Bone marrow Other organs
• PET⁄CT is a useful tool for staging of extranodal lymphoma with
high sensitivity.
• Specificity of PET-CT seems to be related to the sites of
involvement
• Highest specificity in detection of splenic and bone marrow
involvement respectively.
• PPV is higher in lymph node detection
• NPV highest in the bone marrow and other extra nodal affection
by PET CT.
• The highest accuracy is that in splenic involvement detection by
RESULTS
II- Therapeutic response analysis and
response designations according to the
IHP and Deauville criteria classifications
of groups II & III of the study:
Concordance of response designations
between (IHP) and Deauville after early interim
in groups II & III
 Our study showed that 24 out of 30 patients had
concordant designations (91.7%, 83.3%, 70%, and
33.3%) and six patients had discordant
designations.
91.7
0
8.3
16.7
83.3
0
10 10
70
0 0
50
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Percent
CR IHP PD IHP PR IHP ST IHP
CR deauville PD deauville
PR deauville ST deauville
Concordance of response designations
between (IHP) and Deauville after late interim in
groups II & III
 Our study showed that 28 out of 30 patients had
concordant designations (100%, 100%, 80%, and
50%) and two patients had discordant
designations.
100
0 0
0
0
100
0 0
9
66.7
16.7 16.7
0
50
25 25
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Percent
CR IHP PD IHP PR IHP ST IHP
CR deauville PD deauville
PR deauville ST deauville
Concordance of response designations
between (IHP) and Deauville after end of
treatment in groups II & III
 Our study showed that 27 out of 30 patients had
concordant designations (100%, 100% and 71.4%)
and only one patient has discordant designations.
100
0 0 0
100
0 0
28.6
71.4
0
100
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Percent
CR IHP PD IHP PR IHP ST IHP
CR deauville PD deauville PR deauville
Case I:
43 years old male patient with recently
diagnosed lymphoma for pre-treatment
staging.
Then he received 3 cycles chemotherapy for
early interim therapeutic response,
Received additional 2 cycles for late interim
therapeutic response,
Then came for end treatment response.
Case I
In the pretreatment evaluation:
• There’s metabolically active disease involving
multiple lymph nodes above and below the
diaphragm.
• Extranodal involvement of liver, spleen and
bone marrow with soft tissue intermuscular
nodules.
STAGE
IV-S
Deauville criteria
Score 5
Case I
Deauville criteria
Score 4
After 3 cycles chemotherapy (early interim
response),
• There’s complete metabolic response of
the nodal, hepatic and splenic disease and
• Partial metabolic response of the bone
marrow lesions.
Case I
The patient came for late interim
therapeutic response after 2 more
additional chemotherapy cycles,
showed:
• No FDG-avid lesions distinctive for
active lymphoma.
Deauville criteria
Score 2
Case I
Deauville criteria
Score 1
After end of treatment, the patient
underwent PET-CT for relapse/recurrent
assessment showed:
• Still no FDG-avid lesions distinctive for
active lymphoma with no
relapse/recurrent disease.
Overall response by Deauville criteria
showed concordance with IHP .
Case II:
67-year-old female patient with history of large
cell lymphoma, underwent surgical excision of
large left axillary nodal mass followed by 8
cycles of chemotherapy & ended radiotherapy
thereafter, for interim and end treatment
response.
Case II
STAGE
IV-S
Deauvill
e criteria
Score
5
In the baseline study evaluation:
•There’s wide spread
metabolically active nodal
“largest at the Lt. axillary
apex” as well as splenic
lesions.
Case II
Deauville
criteria
Score
3
Interim therapeutic response
after 8 cycles chemotherapy,
showed:
•Two newly observed
hypermetabolic lymph nodes in
the apex of the left axilla,
suggestive of metabolically
active disease.
•Complete metabolic and
morphologic resolution of
Case II
Deauville
criteria
Score
5
After end of treatment, assessment showed:
• Metabolic and morphological progression of the lymph nodes
above and below the diaphragm.
• Marked disease progression regarding the extranodal disease
• Newly depicted splenic, right lung, left kidney, left adrenal and
multiple soft tissue nodules "cutaneous, muscular and inter-
muscular",
Overall response by Deauville
criteria showed concordance with
IHP .
Case III:
A 55 years old male patient with pathologically
proved gastric Lymphoma; for pre-therapy
assessment, the patient received 6 cycles
chemotherapy and underwent 2 sets of
radiotherapy, and came for interim follow up
and end treatment assessment.
Case
III
STAGE
II-E
Deauvill
e criteria
Score
5
In the baseline study
evaluation:
• Metabolically active lymphoma
localized to the gastric pyloric
canal with no extra-gastric
active disease
• There’s few metabolically
active infra-diaphragmatic
Case
III
•In the interim response after
6 cycles of chemotherapy
there’s Complete metabolic
and morphologic response of
the nodal and extranodal
disease with no current
metabolically active gastric
Deauvill
e criteria
Score
2
Case
III
After end of treatment,
showed no evidence of
metabolically active nodal or
extranodal disease,
Deauville
criteria
Score
1
Deauville criteria showed discordance in
interim therapeutic response while
concordance in end of treatment
therapeutic response with IHP
Case IV:
42-year-old male patient with biopsy from
cervical lymph node (pathology details not
available), came for initial staging.
In the baseline
study evaluation:
• There’s
metabolically
active supra and
infra-
diaphragmatic
nodal disease.
Case
IV
In the baseline study
evaluation:
• Extranodal
involvement of the
following:
Nasopharynx ,
Spleen, Multiple
bilateral pulmonary
nodules, Sub-
cutaneous nodule ,
Diffuse increased
18F-FDG uptake is
noted by the bone
marrow and parotid
glands.
Case
IV
STAGE
IV-S
Deauvill
e criteria
Score
5
Case V:
32 years old male patient with gastric ulcer
proved pathologically to be NHL came for
initial staging.
Case
V
In the baseline study evaluation:
• Intense FDG uptake is noted by extensive gastric wall mural
thickening mainly involving the fundus and extends along the lesser
curvature (white arrow).
• FDG-avid infradiaphragmatic amalgamated nodal soft tissue mass
encasing the aorta, IVC, celiac, mesenteric, and renal vessels. It
• Other multiple FDG-avid discrete supra-
diaphragmatic (cervical, mediastinal )and
infra-diaphragmatic lymph nodes
• FDG-avid omental and peritoneal sheet-
like and nodular masses (yellow arrow).
• Bilateral minimal pleural nodular
thickening (red arrow).
Case
V
STAGE
III-E
Deauville
criteria
Score 5
Discussion
 In our study we found in agreement with
Cronin et al, 2010& Soyka et al, 2008 studies
that:
• PET⁄CT is a useful tool for staging of
extranodal lymphoma with high
sensitivity.
• Specificity of PET-CT seems to be
related to the sites of involvement
• Highest specificity in detection of
splenic and bone marrow involvement
respectively.
Discussion
 Paes et al, 2010 & Soyka JD et al, 2008
agreed that extranodal lymphomatous
involvement may be suspected at PET/CT and
the diagnosis can be confirmed only with
biopsy.
 Early assessment also helps prevent
unnecessary side effects from useless
regimens and reduces cost by discontinuing
expensive therapy in patients who do not
respond to treatment. (Blodgett et al, 2007)
Discussion
 In our study, visual assessment using
(Modified Deauville Criteria) were suited to
assess different degrees of therapeutic
response and has been developed to score
images.
 Recommendations from the international
conference of malignant lymphoma (ICML),
Barrington et al, 2014 and Awan et al, 2013
that Deauville criteria has proved as a useful
tool in evaluating response to treatment.
Discussion
 In concordance with Awan et al, 2013, Evens
& Kostakoglu, 2014 studies, we found that
response assessment according to the
Deauville criteria classification appears to
have good concordance with IHP classification
especially in early interim and after end of
treatment response assessment and intended
to represent a practical framework used for
interim PET CT follow up of NHL.
Discussion
 Hutchings et al, 2006, whose stated that
extranodal disease dissemination is an
indicator of tumor aggressiveness and reflects
in response to treatment and the most
important determinants of outcome in NHL.
Discussion
 During this work, we tried to use maximum
18F-FDG uptake SUVmax of the affected
lymph nodes and that of the extra nodal sites
in an attempt to set a relationship between the
SUVmax and the response, and to set a cut off
value that can be used to predict response,
But the wide variation in the SUVmax and
facing many biologic and technical factors
affecting the SUV in our work showed
statistically non significant levels.
Summary & conclusion
 18F-FDG PET/CT is the best oncologic
imaging modality in initial diagnosis, staging
and management of lymphoma.
 PET/CT has a high prognostic value with early
prediction of the response to therapy.
Summary & conclusion
 Response assessment according to the
Deauville criteria classification appears to
have good concordance with IHP classification
with recommendations from ICML for its use in
reporting.
 Collection of additional data as SUV is
recommended so as to develop a database
suitable for additional information to refine the
response metrics for a given tumor and
therapy and as potential prognosticators with
requirement of further validation with a larger
number of patients.
Pet ct assessment of therapeutic response in extra-nodal non Hodgkin lymphoma presentation

More Related Content

What's hot

Response assessment criteria in FDG avid Lymphoma.pptx
Response assessment criteria in FDG avid Lymphoma.pptxResponse assessment criteria in FDG avid Lymphoma.pptx
Response assessment criteria in FDG avid Lymphoma.pptxMiadAlsulami
 
Positron Emission Tomography In Oncology
Positron Emission Tomography In OncologyPositron Emission Tomography In Oncology
Positron Emission Tomography In Oncologyfondas vakalis
 
Nuclear Medicine in Thyroidology
Nuclear Medicine in ThyroidologyNuclear Medicine in Thyroidology
Nuclear Medicine in ThyroidologyLokender Yadav
 
Carcinoma Oropharynx Management
Carcinoma Oropharynx ManagementCarcinoma Oropharynx Management
Carcinoma Oropharynx ManagementSatyajeet Rath
 
Particle beam – proton,neutron & heavy ion therapy
Particle beam – proton,neutron & heavy ion therapyParticle beam – proton,neutron & heavy ion therapy
Particle beam – proton,neutron & heavy ion therapyAswathi c p
 
Cancer of unknown primary: Knowing the unknown
Cancer of unknown primary: Knowing the unknownCancer of unknown primary: Knowing the unknown
Cancer of unknown primary: Knowing the unknownMary Ondinee Manalo Igot
 
Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Stereotactic RadiosurgeryStereotactic Radiosurgery
Stereotactic Radiosurgeryfondas vakalis
 
How Radiation Therapy is Used to Treat Soft Tissue Sarcoma
How Radiation Therapy is Used to Treat Soft Tissue SarcomaHow Radiation Therapy is Used to Treat Soft Tissue Sarcoma
How Radiation Therapy is Used to Treat Soft Tissue SarcomaDana-Farber Cancer Institute
 
Head and neck reirradiation
Head and neck reirradiationHead and neck reirradiation
Head and neck reirradiationKanhu Charan
 
Brachytherapy in breast cancer
Brachytherapy in breast cancerBrachytherapy in breast cancer
Brachytherapy in breast cancerSarthak Moharir
 
Cyberknife- machine and its clinical applications
Cyberknife- machine and its clinical applicationsCyberknife- machine and its clinical applications
Cyberknife- machine and its clinical applicationsDr. Pallavi Jain
 
EWINGS SARCOMA & RADIOTHERAPY
EWINGS SARCOMA & RADIOTHERAPYEWINGS SARCOMA & RADIOTHERAPY
EWINGS SARCOMA & RADIOTHERAPYPaul George
 
Radiotherapy in Extra Nodal Lymphomas
Radiotherapy in Extra Nodal LymphomasRadiotherapy in Extra Nodal Lymphomas
Radiotherapy in Extra Nodal LymphomasMohd Waseem Raza
 
clinical applications of ldr and hdr brachytherapy
clinical applications of ldr and hdr brachytherapyclinical applications of ldr and hdr brachytherapy
clinical applications of ldr and hdr brachytherapysugash
 
Management of Non Small Cell Lung Cancers
Management of Non Small Cell Lung CancersManagement of Non Small Cell Lung Cancers
Management of Non Small Cell Lung CancersPradeep Dhanasekaran
 
I-131 Therapy: Current Practice and Updates
I-131 Therapy: Current Practice and UpdatesI-131 Therapy: Current Practice and Updates
I-131 Therapy: Current Practice and UpdatesMark Tulchinsky
 
Beam modifying devices
Beam modifying devicesBeam modifying devices
Beam modifying devicesMariya Kikali
 

What's hot (20)

Response assessment criteria in FDG avid Lymphoma.pptx
Response assessment criteria in FDG avid Lymphoma.pptxResponse assessment criteria in FDG avid Lymphoma.pptx
Response assessment criteria in FDG avid Lymphoma.pptx
 
Positron Emission Tomography In Oncology
Positron Emission Tomography In OncologyPositron Emission Tomography In Oncology
Positron Emission Tomography In Oncology
 
Nuclear Medicine in Thyroidology
Nuclear Medicine in ThyroidologyNuclear Medicine in Thyroidology
Nuclear Medicine in Thyroidology
 
Carcinoma Oropharynx Management
Carcinoma Oropharynx ManagementCarcinoma Oropharynx Management
Carcinoma Oropharynx Management
 
Particle beam – proton,neutron & heavy ion therapy
Particle beam – proton,neutron & heavy ion therapyParticle beam – proton,neutron & heavy ion therapy
Particle beam – proton,neutron & heavy ion therapy
 
Hybrid imaging
Hybrid imagingHybrid imaging
Hybrid imaging
 
Cancer of unknown primary: Knowing the unknown
Cancer of unknown primary: Knowing the unknownCancer of unknown primary: Knowing the unknown
Cancer of unknown primary: Knowing the unknown
 
Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Stereotactic RadiosurgeryStereotactic Radiosurgery
Stereotactic Radiosurgery
 
How Radiation Therapy is Used to Treat Soft Tissue Sarcoma
How Radiation Therapy is Used to Treat Soft Tissue SarcomaHow Radiation Therapy is Used to Treat Soft Tissue Sarcoma
How Radiation Therapy is Used to Treat Soft Tissue Sarcoma
 
Head and neck reirradiation
Head and neck reirradiationHead and neck reirradiation
Head and neck reirradiation
 
Brachytherapy in breast cancer
Brachytherapy in breast cancerBrachytherapy in breast cancer
Brachytherapy in breast cancer
 
Cyberknife- machine and its clinical applications
Cyberknife- machine and its clinical applicationsCyberknife- machine and its clinical applications
Cyberknife- machine and its clinical applications
 
EWINGS SARCOMA & RADIOTHERAPY
EWINGS SARCOMA & RADIOTHERAPYEWINGS SARCOMA & RADIOTHERAPY
EWINGS SARCOMA & RADIOTHERAPY
 
Radiotherapy in Extra Nodal Lymphomas
Radiotherapy in Extra Nodal LymphomasRadiotherapy in Extra Nodal Lymphomas
Radiotherapy in Extra Nodal Lymphomas
 
PET-CT in Oncology
PET-CT in OncologyPET-CT in Oncology
PET-CT in Oncology
 
clinical applications of ldr and hdr brachytherapy
clinical applications of ldr and hdr brachytherapyclinical applications of ldr and hdr brachytherapy
clinical applications of ldr and hdr brachytherapy
 
Management of Non Small Cell Lung Cancers
Management of Non Small Cell Lung CancersManagement of Non Small Cell Lung Cancers
Management of Non Small Cell Lung Cancers
 
I-131 Therapy: Current Practice and Updates
I-131 Therapy: Current Practice and UpdatesI-131 Therapy: Current Practice and Updates
I-131 Therapy: Current Practice and Updates
 
Beam modifying devices
Beam modifying devicesBeam modifying devices
Beam modifying devices
 
Radionuclide imaging
Radionuclide imagingRadionuclide imaging
Radionuclide imaging
 

Similar to Pet ct assessment of therapeutic response in extra-nodal non Hodgkin lymphoma presentation

The use of deauville criteria in follow up assessment of response to therapy ...
The use of deauville criteria in follow up assessment of response to therapy ...The use of deauville criteria in follow up assessment of response to therapy ...
The use of deauville criteria in follow up assessment of response to therapy ...amr elsisy
 
Motion in Hadron therapy (radiotherapy)
Motion in Hadron therapy (radiotherapy)Motion in Hadron therapy (radiotherapy)
Motion in Hadron therapy (radiotherapy)siavashzare2
 
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...daranisaha
 
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...JohnJulie1
 
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...eshaasini
 
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...semualkaira
 
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...NainaAnon
 
Clinics of Oncology | Oncology Journals | Open Access Journal
Clinics of Oncology | Oncology Journals | Open Access JournalClinics of Oncology | Oncology Journals | Open Access Journal
Clinics of Oncology | Oncology Journals | Open Access JournalEditorSara
 
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...semualkaira
 
High Risk Lymphoma
High Risk LymphomaHigh Risk Lymphoma
High Risk Lymphomaspa718
 
3DCRT vs IMRT in ca. stomach
3DCRT vs IMRT in ca. stomach3DCRT vs IMRT in ca. stomach
3DCRT vs IMRT in ca. stomachDrAkhileshMishra
 
Panel discussion on a rcc
Panel discussion on a rccPanel discussion on a rcc
Panel discussion on a rccmadurai
 
Lymphoma and PET CT.
Lymphoma and PET CT.Lymphoma and PET CT.
Lymphoma and PET CT.MiadAlsulami
 
Radiotherapy in lymphoma(dr fadavi)-001
Radiotherapy in lymphoma(dr fadavi)-001Radiotherapy in lymphoma(dr fadavi)-001
Radiotherapy in lymphoma(dr fadavi)-001pedramfadavi
 
O. Glehen - HIPEC in colorectal carcinomatosis
O. Glehen - HIPEC in colorectal carcinomatosisO. Glehen - HIPEC in colorectal carcinomatosis
O. Glehen - HIPEC in colorectal carcinomatosisGlehen
 
Small cell lung cancer
Small cell lung cancerSmall cell lung cancer
Small cell lung cancerRahul Wagh
 
Hn 1608 advanced lx cancer
Hn 1608 advanced lx cancerHn 1608 advanced lx cancer
Hn 1608 advanced lx cancerYong Chan Ahn
 
Neuroendocrine tumor of git
Neuroendocrine tumor of gitNeuroendocrine tumor of git
Neuroendocrine tumor of gitAtulGupta369
 

Similar to Pet ct assessment of therapeutic response in extra-nodal non Hodgkin lymphoma presentation (20)

The use of deauville criteria in follow up assessment of response to therapy ...
The use of deauville criteria in follow up assessment of response to therapy ...The use of deauville criteria in follow up assessment of response to therapy ...
The use of deauville criteria in follow up assessment of response to therapy ...
 
Motion in Hadron therapy (radiotherapy)
Motion in Hadron therapy (radiotherapy)Motion in Hadron therapy (radiotherapy)
Motion in Hadron therapy (radiotherapy)
 
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
 
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
 
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
 
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
 
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
 
Clinics of Oncology | Oncology Journals | Open Access Journal
Clinics of Oncology | Oncology Journals | Open Access JournalClinics of Oncology | Oncology Journals | Open Access Journal
Clinics of Oncology | Oncology Journals | Open Access Journal
 
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
Upper Rectal Cancer: Benefit After Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Upfront...
 
Cross trial
Cross trialCross trial
Cross trial
 
High Risk Lymphoma
High Risk LymphomaHigh Risk Lymphoma
High Risk Lymphoma
 
Pet scan in chest
Pet scan  in  chestPet scan  in  chest
Pet scan in chest
 
3DCRT vs IMRT in ca. stomach
3DCRT vs IMRT in ca. stomach3DCRT vs IMRT in ca. stomach
3DCRT vs IMRT in ca. stomach
 
Panel discussion on a rcc
Panel discussion on a rccPanel discussion on a rcc
Panel discussion on a rcc
 
Lymphoma and PET CT.
Lymphoma and PET CT.Lymphoma and PET CT.
Lymphoma and PET CT.
 
Radiotherapy in lymphoma(dr fadavi)-001
Radiotherapy in lymphoma(dr fadavi)-001Radiotherapy in lymphoma(dr fadavi)-001
Radiotherapy in lymphoma(dr fadavi)-001
 
O. Glehen - HIPEC in colorectal carcinomatosis
O. Glehen - HIPEC in colorectal carcinomatosisO. Glehen - HIPEC in colorectal carcinomatosis
O. Glehen - HIPEC in colorectal carcinomatosis
 
Small cell lung cancer
Small cell lung cancerSmall cell lung cancer
Small cell lung cancer
 
Hn 1608 advanced lx cancer
Hn 1608 advanced lx cancerHn 1608 advanced lx cancer
Hn 1608 advanced lx cancer
 
Neuroendocrine tumor of git
Neuroendocrine tumor of gitNeuroendocrine tumor of git
Neuroendocrine tumor of git
 

Recently uploaded

Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Availablenarwatsonia7
 
Call Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort Service
Call Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort ServiceCall Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort Service
Call Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort Serviceparulsinha
 
Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...
Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...
Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...narwatsonia7
 
Housewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Housewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment BookingHousewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Housewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Bookingnarwatsonia7
 
Call Girls Service Chennai Jiya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Chennai
Call Girls Service Chennai Jiya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service ChennaiCall Girls Service Chennai Jiya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Chennai
Call Girls Service Chennai Jiya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service ChennaiNehru place Escorts
 
Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...
Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...
Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...Miss joya
 
Call Girls Frazer Town Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Frazer Town Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Call Girls Frazer Town Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Frazer Town Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...narwatsonia7
 
Low Rate Call Girls Pune Esha 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girl...
Low Rate Call Girls Pune Esha 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girl...Low Rate Call Girls Pune Esha 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girl...
Low Rate Call Girls Pune Esha 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girl...Miss joya
 
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment BookingCall Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Bookingnarwatsonia7
 
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service BangaloreCall Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalorenarwatsonia7
 
Call Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls Jaipur
Call Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls JaipurCall Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls Jaipur
Call Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls Jaipurparulsinha
 
Call Girls Hsr Layout Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hsr Layout Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Hsr Layout Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hsr Layout Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Availablenarwatsonia7
 
Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804 Short 1500 💋 Night 6000
Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804  Short 1500  💋 Night 6000Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804  Short 1500  💋 Night 6000
Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804 Short 1500 💋 Night 6000aliya bhat
 
Bangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% Safe
Bangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% SafeBangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% Safe
Bangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% Safenarwatsonia7
 
Call Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy Girls
Call Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy GirlsCall Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy Girls
Call Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy Girlsnehamumbai
 
Vip Call Girls Anna Salai Chennai 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Top Class Girls Available
Vip Call Girls Anna Salai Chennai 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Top Class Girls AvailableVip Call Girls Anna Salai Chennai 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Top Class Girls Available
Vip Call Girls Anna Salai Chennai 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Top Class Girls AvailableNehru place Escorts
 
Call Girls ITPL Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls ITPL Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls ITPL Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls ITPL Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Availablenarwatsonia7
 
Call Girls Jayanagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jayanagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Jayanagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jayanagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Availablenarwatsonia7
 
Kolkata Call Girls Services 9907093804 @24x7 High Class Babes Here Call Now
Kolkata Call Girls Services 9907093804 @24x7 High Class Babes Here Call NowKolkata Call Girls Services 9907093804 @24x7 High Class Babes Here Call Now
Kolkata Call Girls Services 9907093804 @24x7 High Class Babes Here Call NowNehru place Escorts
 
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...CALL GIRLS
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort Service
Call Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort ServiceCall Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort Service
Call Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort Service
 
Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...
Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...
Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...
 
Housewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Housewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment BookingHousewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Housewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
 
Call Girls Service Chennai Jiya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Chennai
Call Girls Service Chennai Jiya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service ChennaiCall Girls Service Chennai Jiya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Chennai
Call Girls Service Chennai Jiya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Chennai
 
Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...
Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...
Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...
 
Call Girls Frazer Town Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Frazer Town Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Call Girls Frazer Town Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Frazer Town Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
 
Low Rate Call Girls Pune Esha 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girl...
Low Rate Call Girls Pune Esha 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girl...Low Rate Call Girls Pune Esha 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girl...
Low Rate Call Girls Pune Esha 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girl...
 
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment BookingCall Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
 
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service BangaloreCall Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
 
Call Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls Jaipur
Call Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls JaipurCall Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls Jaipur
Call Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls Jaipur
 
Call Girls Hsr Layout Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hsr Layout Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Hsr Layout Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hsr Layout Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804 Short 1500 💋 Night 6000
Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804  Short 1500  💋 Night 6000Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804  Short 1500  💋 Night 6000
Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804 Short 1500 💋 Night 6000
 
Bangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% Safe
Bangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% SafeBangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% Safe
Bangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% Safe
 
Call Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy Girls
Call Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy GirlsCall Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy Girls
Call Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy Girls
 
Vip Call Girls Anna Salai Chennai 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Top Class Girls Available
Vip Call Girls Anna Salai Chennai 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Top Class Girls AvailableVip Call Girls Anna Salai Chennai 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Top Class Girls Available
Vip Call Girls Anna Salai Chennai 👉 8250192130 ❣️💯 Top Class Girls Available
 
Call Girls ITPL Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls ITPL Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls ITPL Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls ITPL Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Jayanagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jayanagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Jayanagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jayanagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Kolkata Call Girls Services 9907093804 @24x7 High Class Babes Here Call Now
Kolkata Call Girls Services 9907093804 @24x7 High Class Babes Here Call NowKolkata Call Girls Services 9907093804 @24x7 High Class Babes Here Call Now
Kolkata Call Girls Services 9907093804 @24x7 High Class Babes Here Call Now
 
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
 

Pet ct assessment of therapeutic response in extra-nodal non Hodgkin lymphoma presentation

  • 1. V
  • 2. THE ROLE OF PET/CT IN THE INITIAL STAGING AND EVALUATION OF THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE IN ASSESSMENT OF EXTRANODAL NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA
  • 4. Introduction  Lymphoma are tumors of lymphoid tissue, represents 4% of all cancers.  Lymphoma is generally divided into : Hodgkin’s disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL).  NHL is a multifocal disease which often presents late with disseminated extranodal spread, it accounts 62.4 % of all lymphomas.
  • 5. Introduction  The extra nodal involvements are compromising in approximately 40% of patients.  With the introduction PET/CT scanners, a combined method of metabolic and morphologic imaging is available.
  • 7. Aim of Work  To evaluate the role the PET/CT in initial diagnosis and staging of lymphoma.  Assessment of therapeutic response.  Interim follow up and assessment of remissions/relapses.  Highlighting the role of five-point scale (Deauville criteria) to grade response of therapy using PET-CT.
  • 9. Non Hodgkin lymphoma  NHL's include diffuse large B-cell (31%), follicular (22%), marginal zone or MALT (8%), peripheral T-cell (7- 15%), small lymphocyte B-cell (7%), mantle cell (6%), and others (11%).  Treatment for NHL is based on several factors, including tumor grade.
  • 10. Extranodal NHL  Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in nodal and extranodal sites.  Extranodal lymphoma may be:  Originated in non-nodal tissue (primary ENL)  Originated in nodal tissue and spread to adjacent non-nodal tissue,  Originated in nodal tissue and hematogenous spread to extranodal sites (secondary ENL). (Even-Sapir et al, 2007) o r
  • 11. Extranodal NHL  Most common extranodal sites in Non- Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:  Spleen.
  • 12. Extranodal NHL  Most common extranodal sites in Non- Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:  Waldeyer’s ring.
  • 13. Extranodal NHL  Most common extranodal sites in Non- Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:  Lung and & pleura.
  • 14. Extranodal NHL  Most common extranodal sites in Non- Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:  Bone
  • 15. Extranodal NHL  Most common extranodal sites in Non- Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:  GIT.
  • 16. Extranodal NHL  Most common extranodal sites in Non- Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:  Hepatic.
  • 17. Extranodal NHL  Most common extranodal sites in Non- Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:  Orbit.
  • 18. Extranodal NHL  Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in: Skin.
  • 19. Extranodal NHL  Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in: Salivary gland.
  • 20. Extranodal NHL  Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in: The thymus.
  • 21. Extranodal NHL  Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:  Central nervous system (CNS)
  • 22. Extranodal NHL  Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in:  Peripheral nervous system.
  • 23. Extranodal NHL  Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in: Breast.
  • 24. Extranodal NHL  Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in: Testis.
  • 25. Extranodal NHL  Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in: Genitourinary tract (GUT).
  • 26. Extranodal NHL  Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in: Gall bladder.
  • 27. Extranodal NHL  Other extranodal sites in Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) may arise in: Peritoneum
  • 29. Applicable to any stage: A No B symptoms. B Fever, nocturnal sweats, loss of more than 10% of body weight in previous 6 months. X Bulky disease: mediastinal widening >1/3 measured at the T5–6 level, or mass >10 cm. E Involvement of a single extranodal site contiguous or next to the known lymph node localization. S Splenic involvement.
  • 30.
  • 31. Physical Background and Technical Aspects of PET/CT PET is a functional imaging technique.  Radiopharmaceuticals produced by labeling metabolic markers such as glucose with positron emitting radionuclides such as fluorine 18.  Producing 18F-Fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose (FDG).
  • 32.  Malignant cells show increased glucose utilization.  FDG is analogue to glucose , so they elicit high uptake of FDG.  FDG is ideal for tumor imaging as it allows accurate and noninvasive differentiation of benign from malignant abnormalities. Physical Background and Technical Aspects of PET/CT
  • 33. Hardware of PET-CT Scanner consists of three main components CT scanner PET scanner. Patient bed
  • 34. Technique of Whole-Body PET/CT Imaging with 18F-FDG Patient Preparation  Fasting for 6 hours .  Remove metallic items from the patient.  Insert I.V. catheter .  Check the blood glucose level.  The patient is asked to void activity and speech before scanning .
  • 35.  Dosage Administration  Inject 18F-FDG into the patient in a dosage of 0.22 mCi/kg “10-20 mCi (370 MBq; approximate dose to patient, 3- 5MBq/Kg) 18F-FDG 45–90 minutes before examination”  Oral contrast agents are administered 40 to 60 minutes prior to CT scanning (usually mannitoal as negative oral contrast).  The patient waits 45-60 minutes after FDG administration and is instructed to remain quiet with minimal movement until the completion of the PET/CT scan. Technique of Whole-Body PET/CT Imaging with 18F-FDG
  • 36. Technique of Whole-Body PET/CT Imaging with 18F-FDG
  • 37.
  • 38. Advantages of PET/CT PET demonstrates biological function before anatomical changes take place. CT provides information about the anatomy and morphology. PET/CT combines anatomical information from CT with functional information from PET.
  • 39. Applications for FDG-PET/CT in NHL  Staging  Stage before any treatment started; one dose of chemo may decrease uptake, causing underestimation of stage  Assessment for response to therapy and tumor recurrence  Differentiate scar from residual tumor mass.  Predict outcome.
  • 40. Applications for FDG-PET/CT in NHL  FDG-PET/CT findings can result in : • Change in patient staging up to 44% of patients (either up-stage or down-stage). sensitive and specific than CT imaging alone for staging and restaging lymphoma • Change in patient management in up to 62%.
  • 41.  Image interpretation: Interpretation of the PET CT findings was qualitative and semi-quantitative.  The qualitative evaluation (visual) included the description of all the hypermetabolic lesions (activity > liver or blood pool).  The semi-quantitative evaluation or SUV bases evaluation was performed using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in a region of interest located over the hypermetabolic lesion. Therapy Response Evaluation
  • 42.  Evaluating response to therapy either early assessment, after one to three cycles of treatment, interim or after end of treatment of the overall response.  Usually performed approximately one month after cessation of chemotherapy. Therapy Response Evaluation
  • 43.
  • 44. Patients and Methods  Patients with pathologically proven NHL were included.  Patients performed one or more of the following: Initial PET/CT for staging Interim PET/CT End of treatment PET/CT Follow up PET/CT exams to detect relapse.  Study population 50 patients.
  • 45. We classified the patients in our study into 4 groups; Group I included 10 patients came for initial staging by PET/CT exams. Group II included 8 patients came for pre- treatment staging, continued interim follow up and end treatment assessment by PET/CT exams. Group III included only 22 patients whom underwent interim PET/CT for response assessment after mid treatment. Group IV included 10 interim patients that ended treatment and were seen in our institution for end of treatment PET/CT for relapse/response assessment. Patients and Methods
  • 46.  Most common therapeutic response evaluation guideline in lymphoma was done according to:International Workshop Criteria IWC (1999) guidelines Revised response criteria by international harmonization project (IHP) (Cheson. et al, 2007) Modified Deauville Criteria ‘‘PERCIST’’ — Positron Emission tomography Response Criteria In Solid Tumors. The EORTC PET Therapy Response Evaluation
  • 47. CRITERION CR PR SD PD IHP • Any size/no , if no FDG •Variable/un known FDG, LN must regressed to <= 1.5 cm • Size  50% SPD* • No  LN/L/S • PET+, variable or regression in previous site • Fails to attain CR,PR or PD •50% SPD* •50% LN§ • New lesions > 1.5 cm *Sum product of diameters, § Lymph node  Patients in our study were assessed using IHP (Cheson, et al 2007) and correlated by modified Deauville criteria. I- Revised response criteria by international harmonization project (IHP) (Cheson. et al, 2007). Therapy Response Evaluation
  • 48. II- Modified Deauville criteria. Scor e PET/CT Scan Result 1 No uptake above background 2 Uptake at an initial site that is ≤ to mediastinum 3 Uptake at an initial site that is > mediastinum but ≤ to liver 4 Uptake at an initial site moderately > the liver at any site. “Uptake > the maximum SUV in a large region of normal liver (Barrington. et al, 2014)” 5a Uptake at an initial site that is markedly > the liver 5b Uptake at any new site that is markedly > the liver that is possibly related to lymphoma “uptake is 2 X to 3 X > the maximum SUV in the liver (Barrington. et al, 2014)”. X New areas of uptake unlikely related to lymphoma Therapy Response Evaluation
  • 49. Assessment of treatment response by modified Deauville criteria.  Complete response (CR): scores 1, 2 or 3 together with absence of FDG-avid bone marrow lesion(s) are interpreted as complete metabolic response (CR), irrespective of a persistent mass on CT  Partial response (PR): a Deauville score of 4 or 5, provided:  Uptake is decreased compared with baseline and  Absence of structural progression development on CT  Stable disease (SD): also called no metabolic response: a Deauville score of 4 or 5 without significant change in FDG uptake from baseline.  Progressive disease (PD): a Deauville score of 4 to 5 with increasing intensity compared to baseline or any interim scan and/or any new FDG-avid focus consistent Therapy Response Evaluation
  • 50.
  • 51. I- Organ based analysis and demographic features of all studied groups
  • 52. RESULTS Characteristics Patients group (n= 50) Age (yrs) Range 20-78 Mean ± SD 51.47 ± 14.70 Gender Female 16 (32%) Male 34 (68%) I- Organ based analysis and demographic features of all studied groups
  • 53. At time of presentation of patients in each group we found that 6 % presented stage II-S, 8% presented II-E, 10% presented stage III-S, 26% presented III-E, 12% presented III-SE and 38% presented stage IV. Staging Group Tot al no. % I II III IV I-E 1 0 1 0 2 4% II-S 1 0 2 0 3 6% II-E 2 0 0 2 4 8% III-S 0 0 3 2 5 10% III-E 2 3 6 2 11 22% III- SE 1 2 1 2 6 12%
  • 54. The different organ involvement reported was: Sites of extra-nodal disease Total number of patients Percent % spleen 17 34 Bone marrow & osseous 15 30 liver 9 18 Pulmonary nodules 12 24 Renal 2 4 muscular 4 8 pleural 3 6 GIT 4 8 cutaneous 4 8 nasopharyngeal 4 8 salivary Gland 1 2 Tonsils 2 4 adrenal 2 4 thyroid 1 2 breast 1 2
  • 55. High PET-CT sensitivity 100% with significant P-value 0.0001. Comparison between detection of lymph nodes involvement by CT and PET CT showed that : 100 0 100 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Percent CT positive CT negative PET CT positive PET CT negative All patients in this study had PET-CT evidence of metabolically active one or more lymph node groups, while 42 patients had enlarged lymph nodes by CT. PET/CT depicted avid sub-centimetric lymph nodes in eight out of the 50 patients, that were normal sized LN in
  • 56. high sensitivity of PET-CT of about 100% with high specificity of about 82.5% and significant P- value 0.001 Comparison between detection of splenic involvement by CT and PET CT showed that : 100 0 20 82.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent CT positive CT negative PET CT positive PET CT negative Out of the 50 patients in our study groups, 17 patients had evidence of splenic involvement (increased metabolic activity of the spleen &/or splenic lesions) and 33 patients had no splenic affection detected by PET-CT; while 10 patients only showed splenic involvement by CT and 40 patients show no splenic involvement by CT
  • 57. Comparison between detection of bone marrow involvement by CT and PET CT showed that : high sensitivity of PET CT of 100% with specificity of 74.5% and high significant P- value 0.006. 100 0 25.5 74.5 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Percent CT positive CT negative PET CT positive PET CT negative Out of the 50 patients, 15 patients had evidence of increased metabolic activity of the bone marrow &/or osseous lesions detected by PET-CT while only three patients showed osseous lesions by CT.
  • 58. high sensitivity of PET CT of 76.9% with specificity of 56.8% and high significant P- value 0.037. Comparison between detection of other extranodal involvement by CT and PET CT showed that : 76.9 23.1 43.2 56.8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent CT positive CT negative PET CT positive PET CT negative Out of the 50 patients, 26 patients had evidence of increased metabolic activity of other extranodal organs detected by PET-CT while only 13 patients out of those showed affection by CT.
  • 59. 100 100 100 100 25 82.5 74.5 64.9 87 58.8 20 50 50 97 100 100 84 86 76 74 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Percent Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Accuracy Lymph node Spleen Bone marrow Other organs • PET⁄CT is a useful tool for staging of extranodal lymphoma with high sensitivity. • Specificity of PET-CT seems to be related to the sites of involvement • Highest specificity in detection of splenic and bone marrow involvement respectively. • PPV is higher in lymph node detection • NPV highest in the bone marrow and other extra nodal affection by PET CT. • The highest accuracy is that in splenic involvement detection by
  • 60. RESULTS II- Therapeutic response analysis and response designations according to the IHP and Deauville criteria classifications of groups II & III of the study:
  • 61. Concordance of response designations between (IHP) and Deauville after early interim in groups II & III  Our study showed that 24 out of 30 patients had concordant designations (91.7%, 83.3%, 70%, and 33.3%) and six patients had discordant designations. 91.7 0 8.3 16.7 83.3 0 10 10 70 0 0 50 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Percent CR IHP PD IHP PR IHP ST IHP CR deauville PD deauville PR deauville ST deauville
  • 62. Concordance of response designations between (IHP) and Deauville after late interim in groups II & III  Our study showed that 28 out of 30 patients had concordant designations (100%, 100%, 80%, and 50%) and two patients had discordant designations. 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 9 66.7 16.7 16.7 0 50 25 25 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Percent CR IHP PD IHP PR IHP ST IHP CR deauville PD deauville PR deauville ST deauville
  • 63. Concordance of response designations between (IHP) and Deauville after end of treatment in groups II & III  Our study showed that 27 out of 30 patients had concordant designations (100%, 100% and 71.4%) and only one patient has discordant designations. 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 28.6 71.4 0 100 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Percent CR IHP PD IHP PR IHP ST IHP CR deauville PD deauville PR deauville
  • 64.
  • 65. Case I: 43 years old male patient with recently diagnosed lymphoma for pre-treatment staging. Then he received 3 cycles chemotherapy for early interim therapeutic response, Received additional 2 cycles for late interim therapeutic response, Then came for end treatment response.
  • 66. Case I In the pretreatment evaluation: • There’s metabolically active disease involving multiple lymph nodes above and below the diaphragm. • Extranodal involvement of liver, spleen and bone marrow with soft tissue intermuscular nodules. STAGE IV-S Deauville criteria Score 5
  • 67. Case I Deauville criteria Score 4 After 3 cycles chemotherapy (early interim response), • There’s complete metabolic response of the nodal, hepatic and splenic disease and • Partial metabolic response of the bone marrow lesions.
  • 68. Case I The patient came for late interim therapeutic response after 2 more additional chemotherapy cycles, showed: • No FDG-avid lesions distinctive for active lymphoma. Deauville criteria Score 2
  • 69. Case I Deauville criteria Score 1 After end of treatment, the patient underwent PET-CT for relapse/recurrent assessment showed: • Still no FDG-avid lesions distinctive for active lymphoma with no relapse/recurrent disease. Overall response by Deauville criteria showed concordance with IHP .
  • 70. Case II: 67-year-old female patient with history of large cell lymphoma, underwent surgical excision of large left axillary nodal mass followed by 8 cycles of chemotherapy & ended radiotherapy thereafter, for interim and end treatment response.
  • 71. Case II STAGE IV-S Deauvill e criteria Score 5 In the baseline study evaluation: •There’s wide spread metabolically active nodal “largest at the Lt. axillary apex” as well as splenic lesions.
  • 72. Case II Deauville criteria Score 3 Interim therapeutic response after 8 cycles chemotherapy, showed: •Two newly observed hypermetabolic lymph nodes in the apex of the left axilla, suggestive of metabolically active disease. •Complete metabolic and morphologic resolution of
  • 73. Case II Deauville criteria Score 5 After end of treatment, assessment showed: • Metabolic and morphological progression of the lymph nodes above and below the diaphragm. • Marked disease progression regarding the extranodal disease • Newly depicted splenic, right lung, left kidney, left adrenal and multiple soft tissue nodules "cutaneous, muscular and inter- muscular", Overall response by Deauville criteria showed concordance with IHP .
  • 74. Case III: A 55 years old male patient with pathologically proved gastric Lymphoma; for pre-therapy assessment, the patient received 6 cycles chemotherapy and underwent 2 sets of radiotherapy, and came for interim follow up and end treatment assessment.
  • 75. Case III STAGE II-E Deauvill e criteria Score 5 In the baseline study evaluation: • Metabolically active lymphoma localized to the gastric pyloric canal with no extra-gastric active disease • There’s few metabolically active infra-diaphragmatic
  • 76. Case III •In the interim response after 6 cycles of chemotherapy there’s Complete metabolic and morphologic response of the nodal and extranodal disease with no current metabolically active gastric Deauvill e criteria Score 2
  • 77. Case III After end of treatment, showed no evidence of metabolically active nodal or extranodal disease, Deauville criteria Score 1 Deauville criteria showed discordance in interim therapeutic response while concordance in end of treatment therapeutic response with IHP
  • 78. Case IV: 42-year-old male patient with biopsy from cervical lymph node (pathology details not available), came for initial staging.
  • 79. In the baseline study evaluation: • There’s metabolically active supra and infra- diaphragmatic nodal disease. Case IV
  • 80. In the baseline study evaluation: • Extranodal involvement of the following: Nasopharynx , Spleen, Multiple bilateral pulmonary nodules, Sub- cutaneous nodule , Diffuse increased 18F-FDG uptake is noted by the bone marrow and parotid glands. Case IV STAGE IV-S Deauvill e criteria Score 5
  • 81. Case V: 32 years old male patient with gastric ulcer proved pathologically to be NHL came for initial staging.
  • 82. Case V In the baseline study evaluation: • Intense FDG uptake is noted by extensive gastric wall mural thickening mainly involving the fundus and extends along the lesser curvature (white arrow). • FDG-avid infradiaphragmatic amalgamated nodal soft tissue mass encasing the aorta, IVC, celiac, mesenteric, and renal vessels. It
  • 83. • Other multiple FDG-avid discrete supra- diaphragmatic (cervical, mediastinal )and infra-diaphragmatic lymph nodes • FDG-avid omental and peritoneal sheet- like and nodular masses (yellow arrow). • Bilateral minimal pleural nodular thickening (red arrow). Case V STAGE III-E Deauville criteria Score 5
  • 84.
  • 85. Discussion  In our study we found in agreement with Cronin et al, 2010& Soyka et al, 2008 studies that: • PET⁄CT is a useful tool for staging of extranodal lymphoma with high sensitivity. • Specificity of PET-CT seems to be related to the sites of involvement • Highest specificity in detection of splenic and bone marrow involvement respectively.
  • 86. Discussion  Paes et al, 2010 & Soyka JD et al, 2008 agreed that extranodal lymphomatous involvement may be suspected at PET/CT and the diagnosis can be confirmed only with biopsy.  Early assessment also helps prevent unnecessary side effects from useless regimens and reduces cost by discontinuing expensive therapy in patients who do not respond to treatment. (Blodgett et al, 2007)
  • 87. Discussion  In our study, visual assessment using (Modified Deauville Criteria) were suited to assess different degrees of therapeutic response and has been developed to score images.  Recommendations from the international conference of malignant lymphoma (ICML), Barrington et al, 2014 and Awan et al, 2013 that Deauville criteria has proved as a useful tool in evaluating response to treatment.
  • 88. Discussion  In concordance with Awan et al, 2013, Evens & Kostakoglu, 2014 studies, we found that response assessment according to the Deauville criteria classification appears to have good concordance with IHP classification especially in early interim and after end of treatment response assessment and intended to represent a practical framework used for interim PET CT follow up of NHL.
  • 89. Discussion  Hutchings et al, 2006, whose stated that extranodal disease dissemination is an indicator of tumor aggressiveness and reflects in response to treatment and the most important determinants of outcome in NHL.
  • 90. Discussion  During this work, we tried to use maximum 18F-FDG uptake SUVmax of the affected lymph nodes and that of the extra nodal sites in an attempt to set a relationship between the SUVmax and the response, and to set a cut off value that can be used to predict response, But the wide variation in the SUVmax and facing many biologic and technical factors affecting the SUV in our work showed statistically non significant levels.
  • 91.
  • 92. Summary & conclusion  18F-FDG PET/CT is the best oncologic imaging modality in initial diagnosis, staging and management of lymphoma.  PET/CT has a high prognostic value with early prediction of the response to therapy.
  • 93. Summary & conclusion  Response assessment according to the Deauville criteria classification appears to have good concordance with IHP classification with recommendations from ICML for its use in reporting.  Collection of additional data as SUV is recommended so as to develop a database suitable for additional information to refine the response metrics for a given tumor and therapy and as potential prognosticators with requirement of further validation with a larger number of patients.

Editor's Notes

  1. * The patient lies supine on the scan table . * Topogram (A), or scout scan is obtained for positioning. * Spiral CT scan (B) is obtained. Scanning begins at the level of the skull base and extends caudally to the level of the symphysis pubis. * Followed by a PET scan (C) over the same axial range as B. * CT-based attenuation-correction factors are generated (D) * Attenuation-corrected PET emission data are reconstructed (E). * Finally, fused CT and PET images are displayed (F)
  2. The International Harmonization Project defined the following response criteria: Complete Response is defined as no more increased FDG avidity in a previously FDG avid lesion and as long as there is no increase, the size doesn’t matter. previously non FDG avid lesion Return to normal size of lymphadenopathy with complete resolution of extranodal disease The designation of Partial Response requires: At least 50% decreased in the sum of the product of the diameters Stable disease is defined as: fails to attain the criteria needed for CR, PR and PD. Progressive disease, is defined as: at least increased 50% from nadir in the sum of the product of the diameters. Also, 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified LN. New lesions.
  3. At time of presentation of patients in each group we found that 6 % presented stage II-S, 8% presented II-E, 10% presented stage III-S, 26% presented III-E, 12% presented III-SE and 38% presented stage IV.
  4. At time of presentation of patients in each group we found that 6 % presented stage II-S, 8% presented II-E, 10% presented stage III-S, 26% presented III-E, 12% presented III-SE and 38% presented stage IV.
  5. The different organ involvement reported was: 17 patients had splenic involvement, 15 patients had osseous involvement, nine patients had hepatic involvement, 12 patients showed pulmonary nodules, and two patients had renal affection, four patients showed muscular nodules, three patients had pleural affection, four had GIT involvement, four patients showed cutaneous nodules, four patients had nasopharyngeal affection, one has salivary gland involvement, two patients showed tonsils affection, and two patients had adrenal affection and finally only one patient had one of thyroid, breast, and CNS involvement,
  6. 24 out of 30 patients had concordant designations (91.7%, 83.3%, 70%, and 50%) and six patients had discordant designations.
  7. 24 out of 30 patients had concordant designations (91.7%, 83.3%, 70%, and 50%) and six patients had discordant designations.
  8. 24 out of 30 patients had concordant designations (91.7%, 83.3%, 70%, and 50%) and six patients had discordant designations.
  9. 24 out of 30 patients had concordant designations (91.7%, 83.3%, 70%, and 50%) and six patients had discordant designations.