Dear Readers,
We are back with the April Issue of World Pharma Today. We bring you yet again an informative set of articles that focus majorly on pharma packaging, logistics and supply chain. We hope you will find this issue informative. We would love to have you join us for the next issue. For more information email us at: kathryn@worlpharmatoday.com
Regards,
World Pharma Today
12. MOVING SERIALIZATION FORWARD:
USING AUTOMATED
PROCESSES
TO CONNECT
PHARMACEUTICAL
MANUFACTURING
WITH THE
SUPPLY CHAIN
Having studied logistics, Michiel has
experience working for the Dutch
Department of Defense and in automation
systems simulation and analysis. Before
joining Swisslog, he spent 5 years
optimizing warehouse operations and IT
systems for a pharmaceutical wholesaler.
Michiel
Dutch Department of Defense
and in automation systems simulation
and analysis
13. While the requirements for
serialization in the
pharmaceutical supply chain are
generally regarded as inevitable
- counterfeiting is simply too
large of a problem to not be
addressed - there is some
uncertainty around the specifics,
particularly globally.
14. Regulations are
advancing at various
speeds around the world
and, to date, global
standards as to how
serial numbers should be
formatted have not
emerged.
This uncertainty has
required that
pharmaceutical
manufacturers move
forward cautiously in their
approach to serialization.
They must take steps to
prepare without locking
themselves into
technologies that may not
support future
requirements. To that
end, many have put in
place the systems
required to apply and
capture serialization data
in their packaging
processes, but, have, in
general, not addressed
the impact of tracking
these numbers across
the supply chain.
This is partly due to the nature of
the typical pharmaceutical supply
chain, which is more dependent on
third-party logistics providers
(3PLs) for downstream processes
than other industries. These
providers enable pharma
companies to minimize supply
chain assets and focus their
capital on research and
development, but they tend to limit
their own investments in
automation because short-term
contracts don’t enable them to
realize a return on their investment
within the contract period.
The other consideration is the
different priorities that have existed
in the pharma industry compared
to other industries. Where retailers
and e-commerce companies, in
particular, have adopted
warehouse automation to achieve
the speed and efciency they need
to be competitive, the focus in
pharma has been on risk
mitigation. Pharma companies
have historically been willing to
accept some inefciency if it
means less risk.
Based on those factors, it’s
tempting to conclude that this is
not a good time for pharma
companies to invest in supply
chain technology. In fact, the
opposite is happening.
Serialization requirements are
continuing to advance and the
process of managing serial
numbers requires signicant
changes to the IT systems and
processes that support the supply
chain. Pharma companies are also
now increasing their focus on
supply chain efciency. Forward-
thinking manufacturers are taking
steps to address these challenges
today by evaluating the processes,
software and machinery in the
supply chain in light of serialization
requirements. They
are nding they can
make investments
that move them
closer to meeting
future serialization
requirements, have
value beyond
serialization and are
exible enough to
adapt to
requirements as they
evolve.
15. One area of focus is the IT systems that support the
supply chain. Serialization data must be maintained
and reconciled across the product, case and pallet
in the warehouse and will ultimately be required to
be tracked across the supply chain. That adds
signicantly to the data being captured and stored;
yet, few manufacturers currently have the ability to use
that data to achieve product visibility across the supply
chain.
One problem many face is the fragmented nature of
supply chain IT. IT systems have generally been
deployed on an asneeded basis, creating a distributed
IT support system that isn’t well suited to the future
demands of serialization. The process of centralizing
these systems will be time consuming in some cases
and it isn’t too early to start down that path.
This is an effort that makes sense for manufacturers
because, in addition to simplifying the management of
serialization data, it creates opportunities for them to
advance Industry 4.0 initiatives by using big data
analytics to reduce risk, improve supply chain
performance and gain insights into market
requirements and demands.
SUPPLY CHAIN IT REQUIREMENTS
Another area of focus is warehouse management
software (WMS). Most WMS systems in use today
have the basic capabilities to support serialization,
but may not be well suited to support the supply
chain of the future. Introducing state-of-the-art
warehouse management software today can help
facilitate the evolution to serialization while adding
support for supply chain technologies that
minimize risk and enable new capabilities.
The WMS must be able to support aggregation of
salable product serial numbers across cartons and
palettes so every unit can be tracked to a specic
carton and pallet. That’s generally not too
complicated—until you start moving cartons
between pallets or products between cartons. In
this case, the operator must have the ability to
easily update the serial numbers on both the pallet
or carton from which product was moved and the
pallet or carton to which it was moved.
WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS
15VOL. ISSUE April 20183 I
16. WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS
Beyond serialization, there are
other capabilities that are
important to ensure the WMS can
support the warehouse as
serialization and other warehouse
technologies continue to evolve,
including ease-of-integration,
virtualization and support for
automation.
Integration with MES and ERP
systems is already essential to
managing materials in pharma
manufacturing. But, this has
traditionally required expensive
and time-consuming custom
programming. Newer generation
warehouse management systems
are moving away from proprietary
protocols and embracing common
standards that greatly simplify
software integration. This will
become more important as
systems across the supply chain
are integrated to enable product
tracking from manufacturing to
dispensing.
Virtualization is emerging as a key
technology that creates a host of
new opportunities to improve how
warehouses are operated and
maintained. Within the WMS,
sensor data from processes and
equipment is merged with virtual
warehouse models and
simulations to create a digital copy
or shadow of the warehouse.
Already, virtualization is enabling
functions such as real-time
condition monitoring and material
ow monitoring and much more is
possible. Solutions where this data
is used to see into the future by
combining real-time data with
simulated changes to material
ows are not too far away.
As it evolves, virtualization will
become a valuable tool in the
design and implementation of
warehouse processes and
changes, allowing pharma
companies to evaluate the impact
of new equipment, processes
changes or new products virtually
to optimize processes and material
ows in the design phase. Virtual
reality technology is advancing
rapidly and it won’t be long before
supply chain and warehouse
managers are donning virtual
reality glasses to “walk through”
and explore warehouse changes
virtually in the design phase.
A nal consideration for the WMS
is its support for automation.
17. Many pharma manufacturers
already rely on automated storage
and retrieval systems to provide
materials to manufacturing. These
systems increase the accuracy of
intralogistics processes; however,
compared to the systems available
today, they are expensive, lack
exibility and could be difcult to
implement. This limited their
application for large companies
with stable processes. New
modular automation systems and
collaborative robotics work with
automated guided vehicles
(AGVs) to make automation more
exible, cost-effective and easier
to implement.
Downstream from manufacturing,
new requirements, including
serialization, SKU growth, and the
need to support smaller batches,
has increased the logistics effort in
general, which makes automation
of these processes more attractive.
Companies that were previously
limited in their ability to use
automation can now tap into new
less expensive and easier-to-
deploy solutions to address these
challenges.
These include:
• Production order picking
systems that allow operators to
easily and accurately collect the
products and quantities required
for the next production order on a
pallet that is then delivered to the
production line. These systems
bring product to the picker to
eliminate walking distance and
ensure controlled picking
processes through scanning, line
clearing and pick-to-light
technology.
• Pallet systems that provide
automated storage of raw
materials, semi-nished goods and
nished goods, which can include
goods-to-person stations that
support order preparation,
production and shipping. These
systems can be used to store
semi-nished goods in the
warehouse to enable just-in-time
delivery to production. They can
also support different temperature
zones for manufacturers who must
maintain tight temperature control
over some products. They use
automated cranes to move pallets
within storage and AGVs to
transport pallets from production
and packaging lines.
• Shuttle systems and miniload
cranes that provide dynamic
storage and retrieval of light
goods. Shuttle systems can
consolidate and release totes with
product at high rates in sequence.
USING AUTOMATION TO MITIGATE RISK
17VOL. ISSUE April 20183 I
18. Miniload cranes transport light goods like totes and
trays fast and reliably for production storage. The crane
moves up and down a single aisle to store and retrieve
products in a single-deep or doubledeep conguration.
Although these technologies have been around for
awhile, new modular designs, smart software and
increased performance now make them even more
attractive for pharma companies.
While older WMS systems are not designed to support
automation, requiring an additional software layer
between the WMS and the automation system, new
modular, automation-centric WMS platforms eliminate
this extra layer and greatly simplify the transition to
automation.
By automating product movement in packaging,
pharma manufacturers can minimize the risk of
human error, increase efciency and improve the
management of product recalls. A newer,
automation-centric WMS can enable this
transition while also providing easier integration
with other software systems, support for
virtualization and the ability to leverage self-
learning capabilities for process optimization in
the future
THE END OF THE ROAD FOR SERIALIZATION
While the long-term goal of serialization is track-
and-trace capabilities across the supply chain,
the initial requirements widely focus on the rst
and last leg of the supply chain: the
manufacturing packaging process and the
retailers and pharmacies dispensing
pharmaceuticals to customers. In the near-term,
pharmaceutical distributors are exempt from
capturing and communicating serialization data.
The impact of serialization at the end
of supply chain is similar to that at the
beginning. Hospitals and pharmacies
are preparing for serialization but
uncertain as to when compliance will
be required. Hospitals, in particular,
have implemented GS1-compliant
automated inventory management
systems that provide track-and-trace
capabilities. This is particularly valuable in
larger hospitals that may have products
distributed around the facility—and may
be required to locate a specic batch of a
product subject to recall.
Similar to the manufacturer’s packaging operation,
these pharmacies are turning to automated storage
and retrieval systems to minimize the risk of human
Automated pallet handling systems, such as the
Vectura stacker crane from Swisslog, can be used
to maximize space efciency in the storage of raw
materials, semi-nished goods and nished goods.
19. ABOUT
SWISSLOG
Swisslog designs, develops and
delivers best-in-class automation
solutions for forward-thinking
health-systems, warehouses and
distribution centers. We offer
integrated systems and services
from a single source – from
consulting to design,
implementation and lifetime
customer service. Behind the
company´s success are 2,500
employees worldwide, supporting
customers in more than 50
countries. Swisslog is a member of
the KUKA Group, a leading global
supplier of intelligent automation
solutions.
error. Automated storage systems not only
eliminate picking errors and increase safety at the
dispensing stage, but also create a more efcient
pharmacy workow.
AN INDUSTRY IN TRANSITION
The challenge of serialization is a massive
undertaking for the pharma industry, which is still
clouded by uncertainty. Yet, pharma manufacturers
have made signicant progress in establishing the
foundation for compliance. They have the
technology and processes in place to track
materials as they move through manufacturing to
become semi-nished goods and then nished
goods and many are now using the impetus of
coming regulations to replace outdated WMS
software and increase their use of automation to
mitigate risk and bring new levels of intelligence
and sophistication to the pharmaceutical supply
chain.
20. THE USE OF GAMMA
STERILIZED,
PRE-FILLED SYRINGE
PLUNGERS
FOR READY-TO-USE
PRIMARY PACKAGING
COMPONENTS
Educated in pharmaceutical science,
chemical engineering and organic
chemistry, Philippe Le Gall joined the field
of elastomeric closures for injectables in
the late 1980’s. His work experience,
mostly with Stelmi which became Aptar
Pharma in 2012 has included tenures in
technical services, quality, business &
marketing, project management,
regulatory affairs and pharmaceutical
compliance. Today he is Director, Technical
Support & Regulatory Affairs for Aptar
Pharma.
Philippe Le Gall
Director, Technical Support &
Regulatory Affairs, Injectables
at Aptar Pharma
21. Historically, injectable drugs have mostly been packaged aseptically, with
pharmaceutical laboratories carrying out the sterilization of the primary
packaging components internally. The conventional solution is for
pharmaceutical laboratories to sterilize components before use, generally
using steam. Yet, the alternative solution is to use packaging components
which are sterilized beforehand, by manufacturers. In this instance, the syringe
is sterilized with ethylene oxide after assembly of the tip cap’s needle shield.
The syringe’s rubber plunger is then sterilized by gamma irradiation, which has
proved to be an efficient means of sterilizing packaging components.
This case study by Aptar Pharma explores how gamma sterilization effectively
provides pharmaceutical laboratories with all the necessary safety
requirements, to ensure product release.
Arnaud Fournier graduated from IPAG
Business School Paris and is specialized in
Marketing. He joined Aptar Pharma in 2004 as
Marketing Project Manager and oversaw
marketing studies. Arnaud changed position
in 2013 to Business Support Manager, and
2018 to Senior Business Project Manager. He
now supports and promotes Aptar Pharma’s
range of elastomeric components for vials
and Pre-Filled syringes, and is involved in the
developments of new products and more
particularly PremiumCoat™, within Aptar
Pharma’s coated range of products.
Arnaud Fournier
Senior Business Project Manager,
Injectables at Aptar Pharma
22. Ready-to-Use gamma
sterilized components
The transfer of washing and
sterilization operations from the
laboratory to the plunger supplier
has several advantages for
pharmaceutical laboratories:
• Reduction in human reliance
• Improved productivity
• Economic advantages – reduced
need to invest in equipment
• Reduced stock levels
Addressing issues of risk
Ionizing radiation has the
advantage of sterilizing syringe
plungers within their packaging.
The risk of contamination is
reduced to the handling stage,
when components are transferred
to the sterile zone of drug product
ll & nish. At this stage, the
exterior of the double packaging is
chemically decontaminated before
removal. Equally, containers
equipped with double-port transfer
systems (Rapid Transfer Port -
RTPs) can be used for the aseptic
transfer of materials and
components in isolators and
RABS.
Gamma rays are highly penetrating
and can be used for treating whole
pallets, with the added benet that
exposure dose is well controlled
and can be easily recorded.
Ensuring a regulatory
environment
The Pharmaceutical cGMPs
Guidance for Industry states that
containers and closures should be
rendered sterile and, for parenteral
drug products, nonpyrogenic. The
process used depends on the
container type or its closure
material, and written evidence
must specify the validation and
revalidation of these processes.
The sterilization of rubber plungers
requires the close involvement of
three different parties: the
elastomeric component
manufacturer, the sub-contractor
performing the sterilization and the
pharmaceutical laboratory using
the sterilized components.
Compatibility of the elastomer
formulation
Gamma irradiation can lead to the
degradation of some materials. Its
inuence on the rubber formulation
properties must be studied to
ensure the performance
characteristics of the plungers are
not affected by the sterilization.
The irradiation inuence on a given
property can be different
depending on the formulation. Yet,
the resistance to gamma
sterilization can be modied by the
selection of a suitably-designed
rubber formulation. Some
formulations are more sensitive to
radio sterilization, and the evolution
of the property affected is not
necessarily proportional to the level
of radiation received. Predicting
the inuence of ionizing radiation
on a given type of rubber is
therefore impossible without
research.
The inuence of gamma radiation
The inuence of gamma irradiation
must be assessed with regards to
Figure 1:
• The mechanical, chemical and
functional properties of the
formulation
23. • The biological properties of the
formulation for irradiation levels of
25 and 50 kGy, corresponding to
one and two radio sterilizations
respectively, according to the
recommendations of the standard
pharmacopoeias.
Sterile plungers: Validation
Obtaining “Ready-to-Use” syringe
plungers requires control of all
applicable pharmaceutical
requirements, which mainly affect
the nishing steps (washing and
sterilization). The manufacturing
process must be validated to
ensure the required quality.
Validation of washing procedures
Historically, preparation of
pharmaceutical plungers has been
carried out by pharmaceutical
laboratories themselves. These
procedures for preparing primary
packaging components are
precisely described in the
registration les of each injectable
drug which has been registered
with both the FDA and the
European regulatory authorities.
These operations are now largely
undertaken by component
manufacturers who market "Ready-
to-Sterilize" products.
Regulatory requirements
concern mainly the quality of
the uids used, the
environment and the validation
of the procedure. The quality
of water to be used is clearly
dened in the Guidelines
issued by the FDA and the
EMEA (1) (2). In both cases, it
must comply with the “Puried
Water” or “highly puried
water” Monographs for the
washing and rst rinsing
operations, and the “Water for
Injection” Monograph for the
nal rinsing.
The environment should not allow
any re-contamination after
washing. The sensitive item being
packaged should take place in an
ISO 5 standard classied zone. To
meet these requirements, Aptar
Pharma uses the UltraClean 6
evolution washing process for
plungers, obtaining the highest
particulate and microbiological
cleanliness.
23VOL. ISSUE April 20183 I
Penetrability
Fragmentation
Functional tests (Eur. Ph.)
Self-sealing
Biological tests
Cytotoxicity
Hardness
Tensile strength
Modulus 100
Mechanical properties
Elongation at break
Compression set
Turbidity
Reducing matter
Acidity, Alkalinity
Physical / Chemical tests (Eur. Ph./USP)
Zinc
Chlorides
UV curve, etc.
Figure 1
24. Validation is divided into three
successive phases.
• Installation Qualication (IQ) -
Checks all the equipment is
installed according to the
manufacturer’s specications
• Operational Qualication (OQ) -
Demonstrates that equipment
functions as anticipated under
normal and extreme usage
conditions.
• Performance Qualication (PQ)
- Shows that the process allows
achievement of predetermined
product specication.
Testing particulate and
microbiological
cleanliness does not just
rely on the washing
procedure. All
manufacturing processes
related to plungers must
be optimized to fully limit
contamination risks. This
optimization allows
contamination below 0.1
CFU/cm2 before
sterilization to be
absolutely guaranteed.
Aptar Pharma has prepared a
unique DMF for its production
sites, ensuring the same quality
is provided at every source.
Validation of sterilization
procedures
Validation of the sterilization
procedures with gamma
irradiation has four steps:
Step 1: Determining the
maximum dose
Determining the permitted
maximum irradiation dose
concerns both the product itself
and its packaging. The most
relevant tests are described in the
European Pharmacopoeia,
applicable to rubber closures (3).
They reveal the effect of gamma
sterilization on the product’s
chemical and functional
properties. These tests may be
augmented by measuring the
mechanical properties in
standardized test samples.
Figure 2
25. The results obtained from
chlorobutyl rubber closures
(Figure 2) show great stability of
all properties studied after
exposure to 25 and 50 kGy.
Similar results are obtained with
bromobutyl rubber formulation
tailored for irradiation.
The elastomer-based formulations
offered by Aptar Pharma for sterile
plungers are designed to be
compatible with radio sterilization.
Exposing the plungers to 25 and
50 kGy either does not affect the
investigated properties or has a
negligible inuence on these
properties. Even when irradiated
and aged, these formulations do
not approach the limits described
in the principal norms and
pharmacopoeias.
The inuence of ageing was also
studied. The tests listed in Figure 1
were performed after one and two
years. No notable change in the
chemical prole of the elastomer
formulation was observed.
Step 2: Determination of the
sterilizing dose
The following stage involves
selecting the sterilizing dose. To
perform this task, Aptar Pharma
has chosen to use ISO regulation
11137 (4) relating to the
sterilization of medical devices
and, more specically, to use
Method 1, which involves working
from information about
bioburdens.
A determination of the bioburden is
made from three different batches
of syringe plungers and a table
provides the dose at which SAL
(Sterility Assurance Level) is 10-2
for this bioburden. This value is
then used as the verication dose.
A sample of 100 syringe plungers
is then exposed to this verication
dose and the sterility of each
product is tested individually. If
there are less than two positive
tests out of 100, the sterilizing
dose where SAL is 10-6 is
determined using the same table.
Once the dose is determined, a
periodic audit must be conducted
to conrm the validity of this
sterilizing dose.
Step 3: Determining dose
mapping
Gamma sterilization permits full
pallets of product to be processed.
Therefore, the rst step consists of
determining the conguration
which allows for the most
homogenous irradiation dose
possible to be obtained between
the different points within the load
being treated. Dose-mapping is
validated from three different
loads.
Validation involves distributing the
dosimeters to different points
within each load and therefore
determining the position of the
“cold point (minimum dose)” and
the position of the “hot point
(maximum dose)” so that exposure
relating to these points can be
compared to a ‘routine’ or
reference point. Afterwards, a
single dosimeter will be necessary
for each load and will be placed at
the ‘routine point’.
From the irradiation dose
measured at the routine point we
can deduce the doses received at
both the “cold” and “hot” points
and, therefore, ensure that each
point within the load has at least
received the sterilizing dose
without exceeding the set
maximum dose.
Step 4: Determining the
expiration date
The expiration date is determined
following an aging study
conducted on the nished product.
This allows packaging integrity to
be checked alongside the behavior
of the irradiated product.
Packaging integrity is essential in
terms of preserving sterility. The
packaging of the sterilized
components must provide
protection throughout its shelf life.
This may be demonstrated by
checking the vacuum level in the
bags prior to use.
25VOL. ISSUE April 20183 I
26. Step 5: Protection of the sterile
components
The packaging of the sterilized components must
provide protection throughout its shelf life. Double
packaging is a minimum requirement. However,
the sterility of the component depends on the
ability to verify that the packaging system has not
been damaged during transportation and
handling. A suitable packaging system allows to
check for its integrity at the point of use.
Conclusion
Supplying “Ready-to-Use” primary packaging
materials is the next logical step resulting from
the supply of “Ready-to-Sterilize” components.
Gamma sterilization provides the pharmaceutical
laboratories with all the necessary safety
requirements. The issue of responsibility can be
settled within a contractual context where the key
points to consider are the validation procedure,
the validation les and the data leading to the
product being released.
References
(1) FDA Guidance for Industry. Sterile Drug
Products Produced by Aseptic Processing –
Current Good Manufacturing Practice. September
2004.
(2) EMEA Note for Guidance on Quality of Water
for Pharmaceutical Use. May 2002.
(3) European Pharmacopoeia 5.0. 3.2.9. Rubber
Closures for Containers for Aqueous Parenteral
Preparations, for Powders and for Freeze-Dried
Powders.
(4) ISO 11137-2:2013 Sterilization of health care
products -- Radiation -- Part 2: Establishing the
sterilization dose
ABOUT
APTARPHARMA
Aptar Pharma is part of
AptarGroup, Inc. (NYSE: ATR),
a leading global supplier of a
broad range of innovative
dispensing and sealing
solutions for the beauty,
personal care, home care,
prescription drug, consumer
health care, injectables, food
and beverage markets.
AptarGroup is headquartered
in Crystal Lake, Illinois, with
manufacturing facilities in
North America, Europe, Asia
and South America. For more
information, visit
aptar.com/pharma.
27. www.hhmglobal.com
For any queries related to the Portal, Features,
and Services contact us at support@hhmglobal.com
Plan..
Execute...
Explain..
Online Marketing
in your control...
like never before
www.hhmglobal.com is a leading B2B industry
portal designed for the Healthcare Sector
representing the most advanced healthcare
industry information that allows our clients to
reach both ends of the healthcare facility
procurement chain.
The highlight of www.hhmglobal.com is its
ability to adjust with your marketing standards
and timelines, along with methods that allow you
to target and market based on your selected
audience and geography.
It also allows you to opt for the proven
methods:
Ø Knowledge Base Marketing
Ø Dedicated E-mail marketing with reports
Ø Banners on PPC and PPM
Ø Company and Product Publicity with SEO
www.worldpharmatoday.com
or Advertising Queries:
e-mail : kathryn@worldpharmatoday.com
call to: + 91 88268 49084
Under this option we promote the content delivered by
client in the form of Articles, Webinars, White Papers,
Press Releases, News etc for entire year.
The content which we receive we will also do the below promotional
activities to give maximum visibility.
Ÿ Will be posted under relevant section of World Pharma Today.
Ÿ Will be also posted in our Newsletter which will circulate every week
to registered subscribers Globally of World Pharma Today.
Ÿ Content will be posted in social media also to give more popularity.
Content Marketing
Like Never Before
28. THE FALSIFIED
MEDICINES
DIRECTIVE
- ARE YOU READY?
Based at Leicester, UK, Gill has responsibility
for artwork management services and
structural design. Gill has responsibility to
ensure Cirrus’s various studios offer a full
consultancy service covering constructional &
graphic design, print and artwork
management. Gill has 20 years’ experience in
artwork management for pharmaceutical and
healthcare industries with roles covering pre-
press, artwork and structural design. A
graphic design graduate by training, Gill had
an early career in the design industry.
Gill’s experience covers all paperboard
packaging formats including cartons, labels,
and leaflets and her role involves a close
working relationship with customers. Gill
regularly presents to the world’s leading
healthcare companies and has an in-depth
knowledge of the changing packaging
requirements of this highly regulated sector.
Gill Wright
Design & Development Director
Cirrus
29.
30. The Falsied Medicines Directive -
are you ready?
The Falsied Medicines Directive
2011/62/EU, which is due for
adoption in February 2019, will
require pharmaceutical
companies to apply serialisation
codes to every applicable pack
(OTC and some minor
exemptions). As a consequence,
artwork changes will be required,
which all too often are treated as
a rushed after-thought.
The World Health Organisation
estimates that around 50% of
product recalls are still attributed
to artwork errors and mislabelling.
The industry’s ‘speed to market’
requirements have put more
pressure on artwork teams across
all aspects of the supply chain to
deliver ‘right rst time’ and ‘on-
time’ for critical product launches.
However, it is essential that all
brand-owners consider the
required changes in good time.
Pharmaceutical artwork is a
specialist market and artwork
creation is often complex so
selecting an experienced partner
can prevent damaging hard-
earned reputations or even
product recall.
The impending legislation will
affect all prescription medicines
for the European market. The rst
step to comply with this
legislation is to get your artwork
amended and approved.
What will change?
The legislation requires a ‘unique
identier’ to be placed on
product/packaging so it offers full
traceability throughout the supply
chain. This takes the form of a
data matrix code, a randomly
generated serial number as well
as a national reimbursement
number, if present, and batch and
expiry dates.
It can’t be too hard to add these
extra codes to an existing pack –
can it? The addition of a new
code is relatively simple but
creating the required space and
its impact on the pack’s overall
design is often more involved
than imagined. As well as an area
for the code, it will also require a
surrounding ‘Quiet Zone’ that
further reduces the availability of
free space. In the past, this panel
on the pack only needed to
incorporate a batch code and
expiry stamp so the additional
code may force text to move onto
another panel. As the pack’s
graphics are reformatted it is
essential that compliance with
other existing legislation is not
overlooked. The inclusion of the
proprietary name, generic name
and dosage to appear on three
opposing faces also needs to be
taken into consideration.
The Falsied Medicines Directive
also requires a brand-owner to
add a tamper-evident feature to
their packaging which can have a
signicant impact on a pack’s
real-estate. Tamper evident labels
require varnish and text free
space so this adds further
pressure on already busy pack
designs. If the brand-owner
decides not to use a tamper-
evident label, a mechanical or
constructional solution is another
option. However in order to
achieve this, particularly if the
brand-owner is already using a
standard reverse tuck-end carton,
it may force a move to another
carton format, such as a skillet-
glued, to further increase
available space.
It’s here to stay
Whatever anyone thinks, Brexit
won’t stop the UK implementation
of the Falsied Medicines
Directive as it was passed into UK
law in 2013. Furthermore, the UK
Government is being urged to
comply with EU legislation to
ensure harmonization and
avoiding disruptive supply chain
issues across Europe. [However,
for UK companies, the EMA’s
relocation to mainland Europe
could have a potential impact
leading to another tranche of
artwork changes for centrally
registered products. The outcome
is still unfolding and not yet clear
although it is likely will mean a
change of MA holder address for
centrally licensed products.
A changing supply landscape
It was previously commonplace
for un-audited ‘local’ suppliers to
produce market specic artwork,
with no asset control of artwork
les and even less control if the
process was global. The
associated risks for error and for
non-compliance were high in this
scenario. A typical ‘Big Pharma’
organisation, even today, would
31. have multiple vendors, some compliant and some not.
The market is seeing a signicant shift to control
artwork lifecycle changes and new product launches
via a truly complaint artwork partner.
Why do things still go wrong?
In order to comply with the new directive it is essential
to allow adequate time for potentially signicant
artwork changes. The pressure to get compliant
products quickly into the marketplace can impact on
the quality of the artwork brief. This inevitably results in
more artwork cycles due to errors and omissions
whilst further extending lead-times and escalating
costs.
The issues can be numerous and largely stem from a
lack of understanding of what’s required. In order to
develop the right artwork briefs, it’s essential to build a
partnership that is set-up for success with both parties
working to get the best output. Leading artwork
providers will be dealing with many different
customers, with 1000s of artwork requests, all with
differing needs and requirements. All customers are
different and an agency will need to be sure it is
delivering exactly what’s required.
Selecting the right artwork partner
Pharmaceutical artwork is a specialist market and any
supplier’s workow should be compliant with PS9000 /
ISO9001, audited and dedicated to providing an
artwork service. A supplier’s artwork systems should
t in with your own ways of working and they should
have enough capacity to deal with these changes in
addition to regular artwork lifecycle tasks.
There should also be a clear understanding that the
approved artwork le should not require any further
manipulation by the print vendor so there are no
touch-points in the process.
The use of an automated workow will signicantly
reduce the potential of any errors. Non-compliance
will put both supply and sales at risk. Remember, the
clock is ticking…February 2019 isn’t that far away.
ABOUT
CIRRUS
MPS is a leading global provider of value-
added packaging solutions to a diverse
customer base across the healthcare,
consumer and multi-media markets. MPS
provides its customers with an extensive
array of print-based specialty packaging
solutions, including premium folding
cartons, inserts, labels and rigid
packaging across a variety of substrates
and finishes. MPS has over 70
manufacturing locations across North
America, Europe and Asia and employs
approximately 10,000 people.
Cirrus offers a full artwork creation and
lifecycle management service as well as
packaging design, print and artwork
consultancy.
Cirrus delivers an independent service,
while enjoying the added benefit of
being part of a leading manufacturer of
consumer packaging which ensures
stability and financial support for large
projects. Expert artwork creation and
management is available for all packaging
components, including cartons, labels,
leaflets, foils, information booklets,
sachets, shrink wraps and technical
documentation.
32. SOLVING
THE PATIENT
RECRUITMENT
DILEMMA
Katheryn Shea is Global
Biobanking Lead at Brooks Life
Sciences. She is an accomplished
biobanking expert with 20+ years
of industry experience, author of
peer-reviewed publications,
former President of ISBER, a
current member on technical,
legal and ethical committees, and
an active member of the College
of American Pathologists
Biorepositories Accreditation
Programme.
Katheryn Shea
Biobank Business Lead
33. Patient recruitment is often cited as
one of the biggest challenges faced
by clinical trial professionals. Many
clinical trials fail because sponsors
cannot recruit sufficient patients to
reach their target sample size [1, 2].
In fact, only 55% of trials reach
enrolment targets within their
specified patient recruitment period
[1]. This causes extensions and time
delays which can cost
biopharmaceutical companies up to
$8 million a day in lost sales [3]. The
problem of patient recruitment is
industry-wide, affecting all disease
areas and all countries in which
clinical trials take place [2, 4]. It is
further complicated by patient
dropout rates of up to 40% in
longitudinal studies.
Biopharmaceutical companies spend
considerable time and money on
patient recruitment and retention.
The average cost to recruit and retain
patients for clinical trials of a single
drug is nearly $900,000 [2]. Despite
this investment, many patient
recruitment efforts fail.
34. Why is Patient Recruitment Such
a Signicant Problem?
There is a large body of scientic
literature examining the challenges
of patient recruitment and
discussing potential solutions to
this industry-wide problem. Many
factors contribute to difculties in
recruiting and retaining patients.
The biopharmaceutical industry is
becoming increasingly
competitive, and often two or more
large companies run simultaneous
clinical trials in the same disease
area. Consequently, these
companies must compete for the
same population of patients [2].
Patients and physicians are not
always aware of, or understand the
benets of new clinical trials [2, 4].
Clinical trial failures are often
widely publicized in the
mainstream media which can
cause mistrust in the general
population. Certain community
groups may have social and
cultural aversions to clinical trials
[2, 4].
Many solutions have been
proposed to solve the challenges
of patient ecruitment and retention.
These include: increasing public
awareness through videos,
podcasts, advertising and social
media; offering incentives to
clinical trial staff and participants;
training staff on patient
engagement; face-to-face
discussions with patients; and
trialing new patient engagement
methods such as gamication,
medical animations and patient
engagement platforms [5].
However, due to the
complex nature of clinical
trial design, most patient
recruitment studies have
been qualitative and few
proposed solutions have
been rigorously tested by
quantitative, controlled
scientic experiments [5].
Sample Repurposing Can Solve
the Problem of Patient
Recruitment
Reusing stored clinical samples in
multiple non-interventional
research studies can relieve some
of the burden of patient
recruitment. In the last decade,
research technologies and tools
have advanced, and many newer
assays are signicantly more
sensitive, and require less starting
material than older technologies.
Therefore, it is now possible to
generate more data from clinical
samples. With the correct patient
consent, samples can be aliquoted
and used across multiple studies.
Many government and medical
research funding agencies
advocate for the reuse of clinical
samples. The Medical Research
Council in the UK recently
published ethical guidelines stating
that research organizations should
actively maximize the research use
of all research samples [6].
Sample repurposing offers
signicant nancial and time-
saving benets to
biopharmaceutical companies. It
reduces not only patient
recruitment and retention costs,
but also physician and clinical staff
costs, clinical procedure costs and
clinical trial site costs. Together,
these factors can add up to more
than 50% of the total cost of a
clinical trial [2]. Therefore, sample
repurposing can translate into
hundreds of millions of dollars in
savings. Reusing existing samples
can also accelerate clinical trial
timelines as it can take years to
organize facilities and recruit staff
and patients for a new clinical trial
[2].
Careful planning is required to
reuse clinical samples. Under
current US law, de-identied
samples can be used in new
research studies without further
consent [7]. However, this may
change in the future. Furthermore,
other regulatory regions require
adequate informed consent from
patients before their samples can
be repurposed. This is called
‘broad and enduring’ or ‘generic’
consent [6]. Broad consent is not
considered valid in some EU
member states [8]. Therefore, if
conducting trials in those
countries, sponsors could use two-
part consent, which asks for
separate consent for the planned
study and for storage and future
use [6]. Informed consent
protocols should be culturally
sensitive to all patients [9].
Sample processing and storage
procedures will also affect whether
clinical samples can be used in
future studies [6]. Sample integrity
35. impacts the quality of any data
generated from that sample [10].
For clinical samples to be
successfully repurposed, they
must be collected, stored and
transported using procedures that
maintain sample integrity and
comply with international
regulatory requirements.
Sample Hub™ Integrated Lifecycle
Management
Integrated, standardized clinical
trial sample management allows
companies to repurpose samples
for multiple research studies.
Housing samples within a single
multicenter platform can streamline
workow, accelerate clinical trial
timelines and maximize the value
of clinical samples.
Brooks Life Sciences’ Sample Hub
platform is a global interconnected
network of sample storage,
transport and processing
biorepositories. The biorepositories
are staffed by a team of experts
who can help clients navigate the
complex international regulatory
landscape when designing and
running multicenter clinical trials.
Sample Hub facilities and staff
operate with standardized training,
procedures, protocols and quality
control systems. This ensures all
sample handling and data
generation is standardized across
multicenter clinical trials and
across multiple clinical trials.
Sample Hub is a exible,
integrated platform that can be
customized to each client’s
individual sample management
needs. This includes managing
sample handling, analysis and
storage for active studies;
archiving samples for completed
studies; and planning and project
managing future studies. By
consolidating samples within the
Sample Hub platform,
biopharmaceutical companies can
reduce the cost and timeline of
clinical trials. This is because
samples are stored, transported
and analyzed within a single
platform which streamlines
workows and minimizes sample
handling delays. Samples can be
retrieved within 24 hours and all
vendor relationships are managed
at a central point, sending samples
to central labs, specialty labs or
CROs as required. This integrated
system ensures sample integrity,
chain of condition, chain of identity
and chain of custody are
maintained throughout the sample
management process. The
platform also offers connected
informatics and real-time sample
tracking.
Caption: Brooks Life Sciences' Sample Hub platform offers integrated clinical
sample management solutions to help solve the problem of patient recruitment
and reduce the cost of clinical trials.
35VOL. ISSUE April 20183 I
36. ABOUT
BROOKSLIFE
SCIENCES
Brooks Life Sciences provides
innovative, comprehensive clinical
sample management solutions. Brooks
Life Sciences’ global network of
biorepositories and sample
bioprocessing laboratories ensures
chain of condition, chain of identity and
chain of custody for all client samples.
Biorepositories and co-located sample
bioprocessing laboratories are
strategically located in North America,
Europe and Asia and staffed with
clinical sample management and
QC/QA experts. All facilities adhere to
consistent best-practice protocols, with
certification that includes FDA
approval, ISO 9001:2015 accreditation,
CAP and CLIA certification. Brooks Life
Sciences’ subject matter experts
partner with clients to configure
clinical sample management solutions
to individual workflow requirements.
By repurposing clinical samples and using an integrated,
standardized approach to sample management, such as
the Sample Hub platform, biopharmaceutical companies
can help reduce the problems of patient recruitment and
lower the cost of clinical trials.
References
1.Sully, B.G., S.A. Julious, and J. Nicholl, A
reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled,
multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK
funding agencies. Trials, 2013. 14: p. 166.
2. Sertkaya, A., et al., Examination of Clinical Trial Costs
and Barriers for Drug Development. 2014, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services.
3. The Expanding Web of Clinical Trial Patient
Recruitment. 2014.
4. Kadam, R.A., et al., Challenges in recruitment and
retention of clinical trial subjects. Perspect Clin Res,
2016. 7(3): p. 137-43.
5. Bower, P., et al., Interventions to improve recruitment
and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to
assess current practice and future priorities. Trials, 2014.
15: p. 399.
6. Human Tissue and Biological Samples for Use in
Research: Operational and Ethical Guidelines, M.R.
Council, Editor. 2014, Medical Research Council.
7. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects,
U.S.H.a.H.S. Department, Editor. 2018.
8. Sariyar, M., et al., Sharing and Reuse of Sensitive Data
and Samples: Supporting Researchers in Identifying
Ethical and Legal Requirements. Biopreserv Biobank,
2015. 13(4): p. 263-70.
9. Tindana, P., et al., Ethical issues in the export, storage
and reuse of human biological samples in biomedical
research: perspectives of key stakeholders in Ghana and
Kenya. BMC Med Ethics, 2014. 15: p. 76.
10.NCI Best Practices for Biospecimen Resources. 2016.
37. FOR PHARMA INDUSTRY
REVIEWS
LEADING MAGAZINE
TO DISCUSS ANY ADVERTISING
OPPORTUNITIES PLEASE CONTACT
E: kathryn@worldpharmatoday.com
T: +91 40 4203 0405
M: +91 8826849084
Hard copies
16000+
Visitors P.A
100 K +
E-book copies
90000
New visitors
40%+
38. A COLLABORATIVE
APPROACH TO
INNOVATION
IN PHARMA
Jamie is Director of Product Innovation at
ICON and has more than 15 years’
experience in the CRO environment and
began his career in Data Management,
leading the protocol interpretation, CRF
and eCRF development of over 300 studies
across clinical phase’s I-IV, before working
with ICON Central Laboratories in
developing global standards. Jamie then
took the opportunity to work in IT as a
Solutions Specialist Architect focusing on
Enterprise Portal and Content
Management strategy and solutions. The
last 4 years Jamie has been a member of
the ICON Innovation group creating,
developing and implementing ICON’s
global innovation model, process and
methodologies.
Jamie Tallon
Director, Product Innovation - ICON
39. “IGNITE is a creative
environment that fosters
innovative thinking and
encourages new ideas and
enables users to have their
voice heard in overcoming
challenges that are faced to
find new ways to better
deliver quality data, speed up
clinical development, lower
cost to drug and device
developers, and, to improve
patient safety.”
Imagine the possibilities if we
worked together towards
these goals combining all of
our strengths in new and
uniquely partnerships, our
goal to solve the challenges
of tomorrow, together, today.
40. ICON is continuing
to demonstrate its
commitment to
collaborative
innovation through
the release of its
new digital
innovation
platform, IGNITE,
to foster cross
collaboration and
ideation. This is the
second ideation
platform to be
launched by ICON.
In January 2015 ICON launched its
multi award winning internal Idea
Management Solution called
SPARK. The platform enables all
ICON employees to have their
voice heard by contributing their
ideas, thoughts and insights to
challenges that are released on the
SPARK platform.
Each challenge has an Executive
Sponsor to ensure the support and
alignment against company goals
and objectives, and to also commit
to the prioritization of resource and
budget based on the output of the
challenge.
Challenges can be targeted to any
demographic breakdown of the
organization, for example
controlling access by position,
country, department or
management level. But the power
is in the crowd, and the majority of
challenges that are released are
open to any employee to
participate in. Employees have a
wide spectrum of experiences from
previous roles and positions within
ICON, or at other organizations,
and employees are encouraged to
tap into this unique combination of
knowledge by offering wide
opportunities to contribute.
All ICON employees are
encouraged and challenged to
submit their ideas and insights to a
challenge, and are given the
opportunity to comment and
develop the thoughts and ideas of
their fellow colleagues, as well as
being able to cast their vote on
which ideas they feel will deliver
the greatest value. All input and
contributions are then reviewed by
an assigned team of Subject
Matter Experts against the core
goals and objectives that have
been set out by the Executive
Sponsor. An inbuilt review
functionality called head to head,
enables all ideas to be weighted
against each other through the
review methodology, bubbling the
top ideas that best meet these
goals and objectives to the top.
This review approach enables a
large amount of reviews to be
done accurately in a very short
period of time.
Once the review is completed,
alignment of the SME teams
reviews and results can be viewed,
comparison against user voting
can be completed, and each goal
and objective results looked at
individually.
41. This output, based on multiple
perspectives enables quicker, better
decision making prior to moving
forward with a Proof of Concept ,
road mapping or implementation
stage of the project.
This initiative, as well as helping
ICON overcome challenges
identied and faced, helps to
create an innovative environment
globally throughout the
organization to help promote
cultural and behavioural change
and is supported by the
organizations global recognition
program which has recognized
more than 400 employees since
the launch of SPARK. To date there
have been more than 25
challenges launched on SPARK
engaging nearly 60% of employees
who have contributed nearly 3000
ideas and over 6000 comments
across a variety of use cases and
challenges. This process of
continual employees-led
innovation has generated a
number of new products and
services for the life sciences
industry.
And now it’s time to
expand that innovation
ecosystem with the
launch of IGNITE.
IGNITE: Our industry is united by a
common goal of accelerating and
innovating the development of new
and cost-effective treatments.
These treatments save, extend and
improve patients’ lives across the
globe. Imagine the possibilities if
we collaborated and worked
together towards these goals
combining industry-wide strengths
in new and unique partnerships
and opportunities. We believe this
is the key in reaching our common
goal to solve the challenges of
tomorrow, together, today.
IGNITE is ICONs digital
open innovation
platform that allows
users to share
challenges with other
organizations while also
tapping into the
knowledge and skills of
all ICON employees
worldwide.
The platform enables users to have
their voice heard in overcoming
challenges ranging from better
ways to deliver quality data, speed
up clinical development, lower
costs of drug development, and
improve patient safety.
41VOL. 3 ISSUE I April 2018
42. The IGNITE
platform provides
the opportunity for
collaborations that
tackle ICON Lead,
Partnership,
Hosting or Industry
challenges
supported through
the application of a
simple, effective
methodology
• Frame the problem: Breaking
down the problem to identify the
core challenge faced, and to
rebuild and present the opportunity
to the user in a clear, precise and
engaging format.
• Decide the audience:
Understanding who is the target
audience of the challenge, what
areas should be involved, what
service areas or group does it
affect, and are there any overlaps
with planned or ongoing initiatives
to ensure that alignment.
• Execute the challenge:
Launching the challenge with clear
Executive Sponsor support, strong
communication and an engaging
marketing campaign to help drive
participation for the challenge to
be welcomed as an opportunity to
get involved and have your voice
heard in shaping the direction of
the project.
• Engage and capture: Assigned
core challenge-specic SME team
engage users on the platform,
sharing user submitted ideas and
prompting responses and
contributions from relevant parties.
The Executive Sponsor vocally
advocates the challenge and
initiative through peers, direct
reports and line managers,
encouraging participation.
• Implement and measure:
Continued prioritization and
ownership, communication
throughout implementation stage
showcasing quick wins, short- and
long-term roadmaps, and the
achievements and benets
realized. Clear recognition awards
and the celebration of wins and
achievements throughout lifecycle.
IGNITE helps to breaks down
silos within organizations,
and by sharing your
challenges in IGNITE it
allows you to harness ideas
within our combined teams,
to collaborate and to develop
43. ABOUT
ICON
Since our foundation in Dublin, Ireland in
1990, our mission has been to help our
clients to accelerate the development of
drugs and devices that save lives and improve
quality of life. We do this by delivering best in
class information, solutions and
performance, with an unyielding focus on
quality at all times.
We offer a full range of consulting,
development and commercialisation services
from a global network of offices in 38
countries. We focus our innovation on the
factors that are critical to our clients –
reducing time to market and cost while
increasing quality – and our global team of
experts has unparalleled experience in a
broad range of therapeutic areas.
ICON is a global provider of outsourced drug
development services to biopharma, medical
device, government, biosimilar and generic
organisations.
Our services are supported by in-depth
therapeutic and regulatory expertise and
market-leading technology and analytics. We
are the only full service CRO that offers the
knowledge, software and systems for
adaptive trials.
solutions around your needs quickly and
efciently.
The IGNITE platform can also bring together
research teams and patients to gain insights
into patients’ needs around treatments and
participation in clinical research. IGNITE
pushes the boundaries of innovation within
our industry by fundamentally changing the
ways in which we work together, embedding
the collaborative innovation process within
your company alongside access to ICONs
expertise, and patients’ invaluable experience
and expectations.
.
44. FULL SERVICE:
THE EXPERTISE
AND EFFICIENCY OF
A ONE-STOP SHOP
FULL SERVICE:
THE EXPERTISE
AND EFFICIENCY OF
A ONE-STOP SHOP
Dr. David Brett studied Biological sciences at
the University of East Anglia in the UK. He
earned an MBA at the University of Bayreuth,
Germany, and a PhD in Biochemistry at Imperial
College in London.
After postdoctoral positions at the Institute of
cancer research, he trained at Bioinformatics
with a focus on pharmaceutical drug target
screening. In the Siemens Healthcare strategy
and innovation department, he worked on a
number of topics including protein target
molecules for cancer & diabetes, e-health,
personalized medicine, and molecular imaging.
David joined Vetter in 2010 as product and
service manager with a focus on innovation in
injectable drug-delivery systems, clinical
development and commercial manufacturing.
He became Team leader of Product and Service
Management in 2015, and is responsible for the
development of Vetter’s service offering to
optimally fit customer requirements.
Team Leader, Product and Service Management
Vetter Pharma International GmbH
Dr. David Brett
45. When it comes to the
manufacturing of drugs,
particularly highly sensitive
biologics, a high-level of
expertise is required.
Typically, small and
medium-sized pharma and
biotech companies lack the
knowledge and know-how
necessary to cover all the
processes independently
prior to completion of the
entire final product. That is
why they are dependent on
strong partners such as an
experienced CDMO for the
filling and packaging of the
developed substance. From
development support to
commercial filling and
secondary packaging, the
accomplished CDMO offers
everything at a single
source.
46. Planning: The sooner the better
The establishment of a
partnership with an experienced
CDMO early in the process can
often make the difference. The
sooner and more carefully the
entire production process is
planned, the more value can be
maximized from the overall drug
package. In addition to
comprehensive support during
development -- particularly critical
for complex active ingredients,
this step also includes ll and
nish services. The use of high-
performance production facilities
for clinical lling leads to high-
quality and reliable results, even
with complex and sensitive
substances.
Comprehensive support
throughout all phases of drug
development and manufacturing
A qualied one-stop shop
provides support not only in the
early clinical phases, but also
later in the process, for example,
when launching the product and
commercializing the production
process. Such shops offer all
services from one single source.
Pharma and biotech companies,
in particular, benet from a
comprehensive range of
products and services that are
optimally tailored to meet the
needs of their substances.
In addition to ongoing quality
control by means of
pharmaceutical analyses in
modern laboratory facilities,
support for regulatory inspections
is also included. After all,
experienced CDMOs have long-
term relationships and extensive
expertise in working with
authorities around the world and,
as such, are always up to date
with the latest regulatory
requirements. In addition, they
support the preparation and
compilation of necessary
documentation for clinical trials
as well as for market approval.
Pharma companies that outsource their processes to just a few service
providers can save product and process knowledge throughout the
entire value chain. With the help of know-how gained from successfully
completed development projects, clinical manufacturing processes
can also be transferred more easily to commercial production, thereby
shortening process planning, avoiding unnecessary redundancies and
reducing both risk and costs.
47. Innovative packaging development completes the
full service package
All phases of product development are accompanied
by packaging material development. Competitive
advantages can be achieved with vial alternatives such
as prelled syringes. It is important to always have the
nal product in mind, for example, when the time
comes for nding the most suitable secondary
packaging such as blistering or cartooning. The use of
special injection systems like dual-chamber products,
pens, auto-injectors or safety devices make it possible
to differentiate oneself from the competition, especially
in the area of life cycle management.
With a strong full-service provider by their side,
pharmaceutical and biotech companies can focus on
further product development, while an experienced
CDMO like Vetter manages their processes and
infrastructure.
ABOUT
VETTER
PHARMA
Headquartered in Ravensburg, Germany,
Vetter is a global leading contract
development and manufacturing
organization (CDMO) with production
facilities in Germany and the United
States. The company has long-term
experience offering services ranging
from early development support
including clinical manufacturing, to
commercial supply and various packaging
solutions for vials, syringes and
cartridges.
Vetter’s customers range from small and
midsize to the world’s top 20
pharmaceutical and biotech companies.
As a leading solution provider, the CDMO
recognizes its responsibility in supporting
the needs of its customers in developing
devices that contribute to increased
patient safety, convenience, and
enhanced compliance.
48. Marie-Pierre Pasdelou, PharmD, is a founder and the Chief
Development Officer of CILcare, the world-leading services
company for drug development in hearing and otic disorders,
with unique know-how for assessing the safety and the efficacy
of drug candidates and medical devices related to hearing loss.
Dr. Pasdelou has more than 24 years of experience in the
pharmaceutical industry as a drug developer, and Head of a
Regulatory International Department in Sanofi.
Michael Naimark is Director of Business Development at CBSET
Inc., a GLP-compliant preclinical translational research institute
located in Lexington, Massachusetts. Following a career as a
study director and project manager, Michael focuses on client-
centered outreach in developing new services and capabilities.
He holds an MS degree in neurobiology from the University of
Tennessee Medical Center and is a co-author of several peer-
reviewed publications with an emphasis on stem cell biology
and retinal physiology.
Marie-Pierre Pasdelou, PharmD
CILcare Founder, Chief Development Officer
Michael Naimark, MS
CBSET, Director of Business Development
STEM CELL AND
REGENERATIVE
THERAPIES FOR
HEARING LOSS
STEM CELL AND
REGENERATIVE
THERAPIES FOR
HEARING LOSS
49. The year 2018 marks a notable milestone in the
history of stem cells and regenerative medicine. It
was twenty years ago, in 1998, that James
Thompson and John Gearhart published methods
for the creation of the first human embryonic stem
cell (hESC) lines. In the intervening 20 years, the
field of stem cell research has made many critical
discoveries that advance our understanding of
exogenously modified and expanded cells and their
therapeutic potential in human medicine. New
technologies such as induced pluripotent stem cell
lines (iPSCs) and CRISPR/Cas9 editing are
expanding the possibilities offered by pluripotent
cell therapeutics.
50. These two parallel but related elds have begun to
deliver on the promise envisioned 20 years ago.
Multiple clinical trials are underway for a variety of
indications, including diabetes, retinal disorders, and
postoperative tissue repair and regeneration. One
area that may nally benet from these new
technologies is the eld of hearing and ototoxic
disorders. These have lagged behind other elds of
therapy for several reasons, including the difculty of
accessing the relevant anatomy for therapeutic
treatments, a lack of suitable preclinical models, and
a limited commercial interest in these indications. As
of the publication of this article, the FDA still
recognizes no efcacious therapy for the
preservation or restoration of hearing, an astounding
admission in light of the numerous advances seen in
other, related areas. Fortunately, recent advances in
our understanding of auditory pathways and the
discrete mechanisms underlying auditory function
lead us to believe that real, viable therapies will
become a reality in the near future.
At the same time as these cell technologies were being
investigated, a parallel interest in activating and utilizing
endogenous regenerative capabilities in patient populations
has benetted from advancements in molecular assays and
information processing. Data-intensive “-omics” and
informatics offer the promise of achieving the same
regenerative and reparative goals as customized cell
implants, with the additional safety benets of recruiting each
patient’s own biological mechanisms to create the
therapeutic effect.
51. Mechanism of disease for
hearing disorders
Addressing hearing disorders via
drug- and cell-based therapies
remains a very challenging task
due to the functional and
anatomical limitations associated
with the cochlea: a fully
encompassed, closed, and
integrated auditory system
encased in a dense layer of bone.
These delivery barriers are
compounded by the complexity of
the development, maturation, and
functionality of each individual cell
type in the cochlea, which together
orchestrate an optimally functional
hearing mechanism (see Figure 1).
Deafness or hearing
dysfunction can
result from genetics
or induced
deregulation of one
of several cell types
in the cochlea. Most
research has
focused on
therapies targeting
two cell types of
primary functional
importance in the
cochlea: the hair
cells (HC), and the
spiral ganglia
neurons (SGN). Both cell types are
fully differentiated post-mitotic
cells, and any HC and/or SGN loss
will adversely impact hearing
function and acuity.
Therapeutic approaches
Several possibilities are advancing
through preclinical trials and
demonstrate great potential to
reach the clinic as efcacious
therapies. One approach uses a
traditional cell-based method of
directly replacing the missing cells
in situ. This could be achieved
through direct injection of
differentiated stem cells into the
cochlea; these cells could become
either HCs or SGNs according to
their injection site. Although
straightforward, and consistent
with previous successful stem-cell-
targeting therapies, there are
several scientic and regulatory
shortcomings associated with this
approach (see Table 1).
Building on an increased
understanding of molecular and
cell-based pathways to induce the
activation of endogenous
Figure 1: Development of the inner ear
(Atkinson et al., 2015)
Figure 2: Cells with stem-cell-like
properties in the inner ear (McLean et al., 2016)
51VOL. ISSUE April 20183 I
52. precursor cells in the area of
treatment, a second approach
seeks to replace the same cellular
machinery through the regeneration
of damaged or missing cells. In this
regenerative-medicine approach,
the goal is the activation of
endogenous
"stem-like cells" through small
molecules or biologics in order to
repopulate the missing cells. It has
been shown that stem-like cells
(usually referred to as endogenous
precursors) exist in several
compartments of the cochlea. These
cells are the Lgr5+ cells for the
sensory epithelium and the PLP1+
cells for the SGN (see Figure 2).
Recent research
supports the
possibility that such
cells could be
activated/
reprogrammed
through the
injection/passive
diffusion of small
molecules into the
cochlea in order to
repopulate any
damaged sensory
epithelium and/or
SGN. Advances in
microfluidics and
Administered locally to site of cell replacement
AASDFASASD
Introduction of exogenous cells into the inner ear
to substitute injured hearing Administered neurons
May require an immunosuppressed system
Require additional safety testing for cell migration
and tumorigenicity
Could be effective on hereditary deafness,
sensorineural hearing loss
Potential difculty to reach the targeted location
from the site of transplantation
Can be administered systemically, or locally by
a less invasive/traumatic route
Activate and mobilize endogenous stem cells
into new hair cells
Doesn’t require an immunosuppressed system
Less risks of miss-differentiation, migration or
tumor
Could be effective on age related and noise
induced hearing loss
Targeted-site accessibility depends on the
route of administration
Stem cells Regenerative medicine
Table 1: Comparison of stem-cell-based and
regenerative-medicine-based therapeutic approaches
Company
Table 2: Regenerative therapies in the pipeline
Compound Target pathway Stage
Afchem
ASDFASDFASDF
Akouos
Acousia therapeutic
ASDAFSDFASD
Frequency Therapeutics
Sound Pharmaceuticals
Quark Pharma
Audion therapeutic &
Eli Lilly
Novartis & GenVec
AF243
ASDFASDFASDFASA
Gene therapy
OtopotinASDAFSDFAS
D
FX-322
SPI-5557 (siRNA)
QP-HL3 (siRNA)
LY3056480
ASDSDFASD
CGF166 gene therapy
Neuron survival and neuronal
differentiation
Dedifferentiation supporting
cells into progenitor-like cells
Progenitor cell activation (PCA)
Downregulation of p27Kip1
DFASD
Gamma-secretase inhibitor
Atoh1
Preclinical
ASDFASD
Preclinical
PreclinicalASDF
ASDF
Preclinical
Preclinical
Preclinical
Clinical phase I
ADFASDFASD
Clinical phase II
Boehringer Ingelheim &
China Southeast
University Institute of
Life Sciences
Inception sciences &
Roche
Decibel Therapeutics &
Regeneron
Consortium OTOSTEM
Consortium Hearing
Restoration Project
Regenerate hair cells from inner ear stem cells. Explore key signaling
pathways and proteins involved in regeneration of hair cells, with an
emphasis on nding small-molecule drugs that could stimulate the
process.
Create novel drug therapies that target inner ear hair cell protection and
regeneration in the cochlea.
Build the world’s rst comprehensive, integrated drug discovery,
translational research, and drug development platform for hearing loss
and tinnitus.
Develop 2 strategies for curing hearing loss: 1- stem cell-derived cellular
agents for cell-based therapy. 2- stem cell-derived assays as a screening
tool to identify novel drugs.
Focus on investigating hair cell regeneration as a cure for hearing loss
and tinnitus.
Stem cells Regenerative medicine
53. miniaturization are being applied
in research models where a
prolonged administration of
trophic stimulus may be required
for consistent and efficacious cell
activation and integration. This
allows revolutionary extended
therapeutic access to one of the
most inaccessible areas for
therapeutic intervention.
As with other stem cell and regenerative medicine-
based therapies, those targeting auditory dysfunction
face specic regulatory and technical challenges
related to the manufacture and deployment of each
treatment. Fortunately, as hearing loss is a lagging
indication, the auditory eld can benet from years of
safety testing renement by the FDA and its team at
CBER (The Center of Biologics Evaluation and
Research). This includes well-established guidelines
for testing and evaluating both stem-cell-based and
regenerative-medicine approaches. Some of the key
considerations are summarized in Table 1.
It remains to be seen which approach, or combination
of approaches, will reach the historic designation of
being the rst FDA-approved therapy for the treatment
of hearing loss. What is certain is that advances in our
understanding of the regenerative and restorative
approaches pioneered in other areas of interest have
nally reached the eld of ototoxicity and auditory
damage. A number of therapies are in the pipeline now
(see Table 2). These and others hold the promise of
transformative impacts on patient populations in the
near future.
ABOUTTHE
COMPANIES
CBSET, Inc. – 500 Shire Way, Lexington, MA,
USA – is a not-for-profit translational research
institute specializing in the evaluation of
drugs, biotherapeutics, combination
products, and medical devices. We provide
preclinical services, including in-life testing,
histopathology, and regulatory consulting.
Our GLP-compliant facilities host a
multidisciplinary team of medical, scientific
and regulatory experts who actively
collaborate in getting novel technologies to
market.
CILcare Inc. is the world-leading services
company for drug development in hearing
and otic disorders. CILcare has developed
unique know-how to assess the safety and
the efcacy of drug candidates and
medical devices in drug-induced hearing
loss, noise-induced hearing loss, age-
related hearing loss, salicylate-induced
tinnitus, noise-induced tinnitus and otitis.
54. REBOOTING
THE LIFE
SCIENCE
INDUSTRY
WITH DIGITAL
TECHNOLOGY
Trevor Marshall is director of enterprise
system integration at Zenith Technologies
and has worked for over 20 years in the
pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical
industry. Working as a Business Unit lead
for Zenith Technologies he oversees the
delivery of projects globally for the
company. Trevor also leads the consulting
business, advising clients on best practice
for implementations of manufacturing
systems encompassing DCS, MES and
Historian systems.
Trevor Marshall
Director of enterprise system
integration at Zenith Technologies
55. Digital technology has
been driving change
throughout the life science
industry for years, however
the sector is currently
standing on the precipice
of revolutionary
development – some
organizations have already
taken the jump towards a
more digital future.
56. Businesses across the life science
industry have been collecting data
using large historian systems for
years. Many currently have so
much data arising from different
sources it can be hard to focus on
what is important. Right now,
almost every device in a GMP
manufacturing facility collects data
and our clients have been
completing projects to physically
connect all these devices and
systems for many years. The drive
to physically connect the systems
has come from many strategic
objectives, including serialization.
All this excellent work has put the
industry in a great position to use
the data it is currently collecting in
the best possible way. Although
the robotics and automotive
industries may be in a better
position to use Articial
Intelligence (AI) and self-learning
systems to improve manufacturing
in efforts linked to Industry 4.0 –
the life science industry has been
using data and evidence to
improve its manufacturing for
nearly forty years.
New tools and processes are
emerging that can enable smart,
decentralized production, with
intelligent factories, integrated IT
systems, the Internet of Things
(IoT), and exible, highly integrated
manufacturing systems. In
addition, future developments may
mean that machine learning
algorithms will be able to quickly
adjust manufacturing lines and
production scheduling. New
developments will also pave the
way for predictive maintenance
and the opportunity to identify and
correct issues before they happen.
Data collection and visualization for decision making to
improve the overall performance of the manufacturing
supply chain is a huge opportunity for the life science
industry, however it’s not about being new – it’s about
using proven solutions and approaches to decision
making to improve quality, reliability and reducing waste.
57. Integrating with single
use systems
The adoption of single-use
technologies, such as single-use
bioreactors and other unit
operations is on the rise. Fueled by
the growing pipeline of high
potency and biological drugs and
coinciding with the growth in
personalized medicine and its
inherent need for smaller batches,
single-use technology will play an
increasingly important role in the
coming years.
Both upstream and downstream
manufacturing processes benet
from single-use systems. During
this manufacturing method the
biopharma process system is
disposed of after use as opposed
to being cleaned, enabling quick
set up while reducing cleaning and
validation need.
Currently, the integration of
manufacturing execution
system (MES) solutions with
start-to-nish technologies
and single-use
manufacturing platforms is
helping the industry to
deploy biopharmaceutical
manufacturing with
increased productivity and
efciency. The upshot is
that manufacturers can
signicantly reduce the
time-to-market for new
products.
Single-use components are also
an enabling technology for smaller
scale production of
biopharmaceuticals, including
antibodies, proteins, vaccines and
cell therapies, which would
otherwise be much more difcult to
produce. Increased productivity
and efciency are also a necessity
when it comes to manufacturing
smaller batches and a wider range
of product. In this environment,
single-use technology will naturally
ourish as a simple, cost-effective
solution.
Digital manufacturing
The rst steps towards fully
connected, self-optimizing
production processes have been
taken – the advent of digital
manufacturing is on the horizon.
Enterprise Manufacturing
Intelligence (MI) involves
accessing more meaningful data
to give a better, more holistic view
of operations and allowing for
improved analytics and real-time
responsive decision-making to
drive continuous improvement.
Access to this data, or Big data,
also allows for the creation of
digital twins. A digital twin can be
made up of data captured from the
entire end-to-end manufacturing
process of a product – this twin
can then be used to nd invaluable
insights. Extension of the
traditional ‘golden batch’, where
data was very much process
control-based, will be
supplemented and surrounded
with environmental data, raw
material data, training data and
any other digital data available that
goes towards inuencing the
golden batch. With this digital
information available across
multiple sites, batches and
suppliers, sophisticated analytics
can provide a digital twin that best
represents the golden batch and
alerts controllers to any problems
based on these specic data sets.
57VOL. ISSUE April 20183 I
58. Patient centricity
Digital technology is connecting genetic information with
real world data and companies are already combining
drugs, advanced application devices, and apps to be
more patient-centric. This push towards customized
medicines solutions, driven by technological advances
and pressure from patients who want to be more involved
in their own care, will take the market in new directions.
The impact on the market, and more notably
manufacturers, is that there will be a growing demand for
smaller batches which will highlight any inexibility in a
manufacturer’s supply chain.
The propagation of product variants and smaller batch
sizes will mean that launch approaches, process
technologies and validation concepts will need to be
overhauled.
Final thought
While the life science industry will, for the most-part, take
a graduated approach to adopting new digital technology
that builds upon current approaches and enhances the
performance of proven solutions, those companies that
are already investing will maintain a signicant
competitive advantage. Implementing and using digital
technologies successfully will see businesses leveraging
data analytics that can lead to valuable process
improvements and help them to operate with greater
agility, cost-efciency and compliance. The introduction of
new pharmaceutical products may take weeks, rather
than months or even years – the positive impact that
digital technology can have on patient lives, which is
ultimately what the life science industry strives for, cannot
be understated.
The adoption of cloud and edge computing to the life
science industry truly offers organizations the ability to
gain insights that are currently just not available with
existing infrastructures and technologies. Digitalizing and
connecting the data across the entire supply chain with
embedded context will lead to asset performance and
utilization improvements, but ultimately will lead to the
adoption of advanced analytics that will improve insights
gained in the science of making life saving drugs.
ABOUT
ZENITH
TECHNOLOGIES
Founded in 1998, Zenith has 16 offices
worldwide with over 800 skilled
employees, delivering over 3500 years
combined engineering experience. The
company is a world leader in delivering
manufacturing software systems that
make businesses compliant and
competitive. Zenith specializes in
providing enterprise performance
solutions comprised of manufacturing
execution systems (MES), automation and
process control to life science companies
globally. Working with 9 out of the top 10
pharmaceutical and biotech companies,
Zenith provides performance
improvements, reduced costs, total
compliance and improved operator
effectiveness through combining
experienced engineers and consultants,
comprehensive design methodologies,
and leading-edge technology
implementation.