SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 8
Download to read offline
The Arizona School Tuition Organization Association Survey of Corporate Tuition Tax-Credit
Scholarship Recipients’ Family Income: School Years 2006-07 and 2007-08
By Vicki E. Murray, Ph.D.*
Executive Summary
Arizona school tuition organizations (STOs) participating in the corporate tuition tax-credit scholarship
program are required by law to submit annual reports to the Arizona Department of Revenue, including
verification of a completed independent review of financial statements. The law, however, does not
require that participating STOs report scholarship recipients’ annual family income. The Arizona
School Tuition Organization Association (ASTOA) therefore decided to conduct voluntary annual
surveys of participating STOs to determine the family income level of students being served.
Survey results indicate that family income of corporate tax-credit scholarship recipients for the 2006-
07 and 2007-08 school years did not exceed income eligibility limits. For the 2006-07 school year the
average scholarship family earned $28,458, below the allowable annual income limit of $68,450. The
average scholarship family earned $35,533 during 2007-08 school year, also below the annual income
limit of $70,676.1
A total of 19 STOs have awarded corporate tuition tax-credit scholarships since the program’s
inception in September 2006.2
All but six STOs distributing scholarship donations for the 2006-07 or
2007-08 school years participated in the ASTOA voluntary survey of scholarship recipients’ family
income. Those STOs account for 97 percent of all scholarship donations distributed for the 2006-07
and 2007-08 school years.3
Three of the four STOs awarding scholarships in the 2006-07 school year
participated in the ASTOA survey and accounted for 95 percent of all scholarship donations distributed
that school year. Fourteen of the 19 STOs awarding scholarships in the 2007-08 school year
participated in the ASTOA survey and accounted for 98 percent of all scholarship donations distributed
that school year.
The Arizona Corporate Tax-Credit Scholarship Program
On June 21, 2006, Arizona adopted a corporate tax-credit scholarship program that allows businesses
to take credits against their state taxes for contributions to 501(c)(3) non-profit charitable organizations
that raise money for scholarships, called school tuition organizations (STOs).4
The program went into
effect on September 21, 2006, and will be up for renewal on June 30, 2011. In fiscal year 2007
(corresponding to the 2006-07 school year), aggregate corporate tax credits cannot exceed $10 million.
Each year thereafter, the aggregate tax-credit cap is increased by 20 percent, which amounts to $12
million in fiscal year 2008 (corresponding to the 2007-08 school year), increasing to $20.7 million in
fiscal year 2011 (corresponding with the 2010-11 school year).5
Public school students and students
entering kindergarten are eligible for corporate tuition tax-credit scholarships if their families’ annual
incomes do not exceed 185 percent of the income level required to qualify for the federal free- or
reduced-price lunch program.6
*
Vicki E. Murray, Ph.D., is Senior Policy Fellow in Education Studies at the Pacific Research Institute in Sacramento,
California.
1
About the ASTOA Survey
Arizona STOs participating in the corporate tuition tax-credit scholarship program are required by law
to submit annual reports to the state revenue department, including information about contributions
received, scholarships awarded, and verification of a completed independent review of financial
statements.7
The law, however, does not require participating STOs to include information about
scholarship recipients’ annual family income.
In June 2008 the Arizona School Tuition Organization Association (ASTOA) decided to begin
conducting voluntary annual surveys of STOs participating corporate tax-credit scholarship program,
including non-ASTOA member STOs, to make information about scholarship recipients’ family
income public (Reproduced in the Appendix).8
This analysis examines family income of students
receiving scholarships in the 2006-07 and 2007-08 school years. Two school years are included in this
analysis, while subsequent surveys will cover only one school year. Because the program became
operational on September 21, 2006, STOs had only three months (through December 31, 2006) to
collect donations. Only four STOs distributed scholarships for the 2006-07 school year given the brief
time to collect and distribute corporate scholarship donations. Most participating STOs opted to wait
until the 2007-08 school year to distribute scholarship donations raised in late 2006 and 2007.9
Subsequent annual surveys will examine family income of students receiving corporate tax-credit
scholarships in school years 2008-09 through 2010-11.
How the ASTOA Survey Analysis Differs from Arizona Department of Revenue Annual Reports
The information in this analysis was provided by STOs participating in an email survey conducted
from July 1, 2008, through August 1, 2008. This deadline was subsequently extended to August 15,
2008, to allow more interested STOs to collect the necessary information, beginning with the family
incomes of students receiving corporate tax-credit scholarships. Since the ASTOA survey focuses on
family income of corporate tax-credit scholarship recipients, the time frame covered is a given school
year, not calendar or fiscal year in which school years overlap. Using a different time frame than
analyses like the Arizona Department of Revenue annual reports means the number of scholarships and
recipients identified will differ.
In addition to the time period covered, the number of scholarship recipients reported by STOs for the
ASTOA survey may exceed the number identified by the Arizona Department of Revenue because
many STOs award scholarships in lump-sum amounts to families for two or more children. Thus the
number of scholarships awarded by STOs may be less than the number of actual scholarship
recipients. To ensure the most accurate number of actual scholarship recipients and determine whether
their families’ incomes meet the income eligibility requirements, which depends on family size,
ASTOA survey participants were asked to break down lump-sum scholarship awards used by two or
more siblings from the same families. The governing statute does not expressly account for this
possibility in its reporting requirements.10
The number of actual scholarship recipients also affects the average scholarship amounts awarded by
STOs. Again, when lump-sum awards are made to two or more siblings from a single family, the
number of actual scholarship recipients is greater than the number of scholarships STOs award.
Because the ASTOA survey divides the total value of scholarships awarded by a higher number of
actual recipients, average scholarship amounts reported in this analysis may be lower in some cases
than those reported by the Arizona Department of Revenue.
2
Average Family Income: 2006-07 School Year
As previously explained, given the limited time to collect and distribute corporate tax-credit
scholarship donations from September 21 to December 31, 2006, only four STOs awarded corporate
tax-credit scholarship for the 2006-07 school year. The three participating STOs accounted for 95
percent of all scholarship donations distributed that school year. To be eligible for a corporate tax-
credit scholarship, a student’s family income cannot exceed 185 percent of the income limit making a
student eligible for reduced-price meals under the national school lunch program. For a family of four,
this amount was $68,450 for the 2006-07 school year.11
The average family income of scholarship
recipients that school year was $28,458, and the average family size was four.
Table 1: Average Family Income of Scholarship Recipients, School Year 2006-07
STO City
SY
Scholarship
Used
Average
Family
Income of
Scholarship
Recipients
Average
Family Size
of
Scholarship
Recipients
Average
Scholarship
Amount
#
Scholarship
Recipients
Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese
of Tucson Tucson 2006-07 $29,871 4 $4,258 55
Cheder Scholarship Organization Tucson 2006-07 $21,939 4 $2,875 4
Cochise Christian STO Hereford 2006-07 * * * *
Institute for Better Education Tucson 2006-07 $33,563 4 $2,368 5
Source: Author’s table based on data from the ASTOA voluntary survey.
Notes:
1. “SY” stands for school year. “STO” stands for school tuition organization.
2. The Cochise Christian School Tuition Organization did not respond to requests to participate in the survey; therefore
average family size and income data were not available, indicated by the asterisk (*).
3. The number of scholarship recipients in this survey may exceed the number identified by the Arizona Department of
Revenue. Many STOs award scholarships in lump-sum amounts to families for two or more children. Thus the number of
scholarships awarded may not necessarily equal the number of actual scholarship recipients. ASTOA survey participants
were asked to break down lump-sum scholarship awards to be used by siblings from the same families. In instances where
precise amounts were unavailable, STOs provided average scholarship awards based on the lump-sum award amount and
the number of siblings.
4. The average scholarship amounts in the ASTOA survey may differ from those reported by the Arizona Department of
Revenue because of the different methodology used to identify the number of actual scholarship recipients, as described in
note 3.
5. Another methodological difference between the ASTOA survey and the Arizona Department of Revenue annual reports
is that the ASTOA survey covers scholarships awarded during school years, not calendar or fiscal years, which affect both
the average scholarship amounts and the number of scholarship recipients.
6. The Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of Tucson was not included in the Arizona Department of Revenue’s
2006 Annual Report because of the different reporting time period covered.
Average Family Income: 2007-08 School Year
Most STOs began collecting corporate donations in 2006 and distributed scholarships for the 2007-08
school year. Of the 19 STOs awarding corporate tax-credit scholarships that school year, 14
participated in the ASTOA survey and accounted for 98 percent of all scholarship donations distributed
that school year. Two STOs were not able to provide complete data by the survey deadline, and three
STOs did not respond to requests to participate in the survey.12
Again, to be eligible for a corporate
tax-credit scholarship, a student’s family income cannot exceed 185 percent of the income limit
making a student eligible for reduced-price meals under the national school lunch program. For a
3
family of four, this amount was $70,676 for the 2007-08 school year.13
The average family income of
scholarship recipients that school year was $35,533, and the average family size was four.
Table 2: Average Family Income of Scholarship Recipients, School Year 2007-08
STO City
SY
Scholarshi
p Used
Average
Family
Income of
Scholarshi
p
Recipients
Average
Family Size
of
Scholarshi
p
Recipients
Average
Scholarshi
p Amount
#
Scholarshi
p
Recipients
Arizona Corporate Scholarship Fund Mesa 2007-08 $39,180 4 $225 3
Arizona Episcopal Schools Foundation Tucson 2007-08 * * * *
Arizona School Choice Trust Glendale 2007-08 $44,000 4 $2,103 409
Brophy Community Foundation Phoenix 2007-08 $34,846 5 $2,025 119
Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of
Phoenix Phoenix 2007-08 $36,968 4 $2,500 517
Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of
Tucson Tucson 2007-08 $34,475 4 $3,037 345
Chaparral Mission Scholarship Fund
Scottsdal
e 2007-08 * * $3,000 *
Cheder Scholarship Organization Tucson 2007-08 $19,840 3 $4,160 10
Christian Scholarship Fund of Arizona Tucson 2007-08 * * * *
Cochise Christian STO Hereford 2007-08 * * * *
Flagstaff Christian Scholarship Fund Flagstaff 2007-08 $42,673 5 $2,873 44
Institute for Better Education Tucson 2007-08 $25,392 4 $3,565 16
Jewish Tuition Organization
Scottsdal
e 2007-08 $34,696 4 $3,750 6
Maricopa County Schoolhouse Foundation Phoenix 2007-08 * * * *
New Valley Education Partners
Scottsdal
e 2007-08 * * * *
Prescott Christian School Scholarship
Foundation Prescott 2007-08 $31,278 5 $1,400 18
School Choice Arizona Chandler 2007-08 $39,392 5 $2,296 345
School Tuition Association of Yuma, Inc. Yuma 2007-08 $39,531 4 $735 16
Tuition Organization for Private Schools Mesa 2007-08 $38,787 5 $1,575 12
Source: Author’s table based on data from the ASTOA voluntary survey.
Notes:
1. “SY” stands for school year. “STO” stands for school tuition organization.
2. Average family sizes and income data are not available, indicated by the asterisk (*). The Arizona Episcopal Schools
Foundation wanted to participate in the ASTOA survey but was unable to supply the necessary data by the survey deadline.
They plan to participate in future annual ASTOA surveys. The Chaparral Mission Scholarship Fund awarded one
scholarship worth $3,000, which was used at the American Indian Christian Mission School. The STO was unable to obtain
family income data by the survey deadline. The following STOs did not respond to requests to participate in the survey:
Cochise Christian School Tuition Organization; Maricopa County Schoolhouse Foundation; and New Valley Education
Partners.
3. The number of scholarship recipients in this survey may exceed the number identified by the Arizona Department of
Revenue. Many STOs award scholarships in lump-sum amounts to families for two or more children. Thus the number of
scholarships awarded may not necessarily equal the number of actual scholarship recipients. ASTOA survey participants
were asked to break down lump-sum scholarship awards to be used by siblings from the same families. In instances where
precise amounts were unavailable, STOs provided average scholarship awards based on the lump-sum award amount and
the number of siblings.
4. The average scholarship amounts in the ASTOA survey may differ from those reported by the Arizona Department of
Revenue because of the different methodology used to identify the number of actual scholarship recipients, as described in
note 3.
5. Another methodological difference between the ASTOA survey and the Arizona Department of Revenue annual reports
is that the ASTOA survey covers scholarships awarded during school years, not calendar or fiscal years, which affect both
the average scholarship amounts and the number of scholarship recipients.
4
Comparing Average Family Income of Scholarship Recipients to Income Eligibility Limits
The average scholarship recipient in both school years came from a family of four. For the 2006-07
school year the average scholarship family earned $28,458, compared to the allowable annual income
of $68,450 that school year. The average scholarship family earned $35,533 during 2007-08 school
year, below the annual income limit of $70,676 that school year.
Table 3: Average Family Income and Eligibility Limits Compared, School Years 2006-07 and
2007-08
STO City
SY
Scholarshi
p Used
Average Family
Income of
Scholarship
Recipients
Average Family
Size of
Scholarship
Recipients
Corresponding
Income Limit
(by SY and
Family Size)
Arizona Corporate Scholarship Fund Mesa 2007-08 $39,180 4 $70,676
Arizona Episcopal Schools Foundation Tucson 2007-08 * * *
Arizona School Choice Trust Glendale 2007-08 $44,000 4 $70,676
Brophy Community Foundation Phoenix 2007-08 $34,846 5 $82,586
Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of
Phoenix Phoenix 2007-08 $36,968 4 $70,676
Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of
Tucson Tucson 2006-07 $29,871 4 $68,450
Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of
Tucson Tucson 2007-08 $35,348 4 $70,676
Chaparral Mission Scholarship Fund
Scottsdal
e 2007-08 * * *
Cheder Scholarship Organization Tucson 2006-07 $21,939 4 $68,450
Cheder Scholarship Organization Tucson 2007-08 $19,840 3 $58,765
Christian Scholarship Fund of Arizona Tucson 2007-08 * * *
Cochise Christian STO Hereford 2006-07 * * *
Cochise Christian STO Hereford 2007-08 * * *
Flagstaff Christian Scholarship Fund Flagstaff 2007-08 $42,673 5 $82,586
Institute for Better Education Tucson 2006-07 $33,563 4 $68,450
Institute for Better Education Tucson 2007-08 $25,392 4 $70,676
Jewish Tuition Organization
Scottsdal
e 2007-08 $34,696 4 $70,676
Maricopa County Schoolhouse Foundation Phoenix 2007-08 * * *
New Valley Education Partners
Scottsdal
e 2007-08 * * *
Prescott Christian School Scholarship
Foundation Prescott 2007-08 $31,278 5 $82,586
School Choice Arizona Chandler 2007-08 $39,392 5 $82,586
School Tuition Association of Yuma, Inc. Yuma 2007-08 $39,531 4 $70,676
Tuition Organization for Private Schools Mesa 2007-08 $38,787 5 $82,586
Sources: Author’s table based on data from the ASTOA voluntary survey and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food
and Nutrition Service, Income Eligibility Guidelines for corresponding school years.
Notes:
1. “SY” stands for school year. “STO” stands for school tuition organization.
2. Average family sizes and income data are not available, indicated by the asterisk (*). The Arizona Episcopal Schools
Foundation wanted to participate but was unable to supply the necessary data by the survey deadline. They plan to
participate in future annual ASTOA surveys. The Chaparral Mission Scholarship Fund awarded one scholarship worth
$3,000, which was used at the American Indian Christian Mission School. The STO was unable to obtain family income
data by the survey deadline. The following STOs did not respond to requests to participate in the survey: Cochise Christian
School Tuition Organization; Maricopa County Schoolhouse Foundation; and New Valley Education Partners.
5
7. The Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of Tucson was not included in the Arizona Department of Revenue’s
2006 Annual Report because of the different reporting time period covered.
Conclusion
The Arizona School Tuition Organization Association (ASTOA) decided to conduct voluntary annual
surveys of participating STOs to determine the income level of the students being served. Participating
STOs accounted for 97 percent of all scholarship donations distributed for the 2006-07 and 2007-08
school years. Survey results indicate that family income of corporate tax-credit scholarship recipients
for the 2006-07 and 2007-08 school years did not exceed income eligibility limits. For the 2006-07
school year the average scholarship family earned $28,458, which is below the allowable annual
income limit of $68,450. The average scholarship family earned $35,533 during 2007-08 school year,
also below the annual income limit of $70,676.
6
Appendix: Survey
ASTOA Corporate Income Tax-Credit Scholarship Survey of Participating Family Income
Due by August 1, 2008, to Vicki E. Murray [extended to August 15, 2008]
For School Years 2006-07 & 2007-08
Part I: School Tuition Organization Information
STO NAME
Address
City
Zip
Contact Person Name
Contact Person Title
Phone
Email
Website
Part II: Scholarship Recipients' Annual Family Incomes & Scholarship Amounts
Calendar Year Donations Collected
School Year Scholarship Used
Family Income of Scholarship Recipient
Family Size
Recipient Scholarship Amount
Notes: [used to break down lump-sum scholarships by the number of sibling recipients]
7
8
Endnotes:
1
For a family of four, 185 percent of the allowable income limit was $$70,675.66 for the 2007-08 school year. The author
rounded this figure to $70,676. See the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, “Income Eligibility
Guidelines” website, http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/governance/notices/iegs/iegs.htm. The Arizona Department of Revenue
calculates this figure at $70,674, likely due to a rounding difference. See the Arizona Department of Revenue, Office of
Research and Analysis, “Corporate income Tax Credit for Contributions to School Tuition Organizations: Reporting for
2006,” August 7, 2007, p. 3, http://www.azdor.gov/ResearchStats/corporateprivateschoolmenu.htm.
2
The Cochise Christian School Tuition Organization awarded scholarships in the 2006-07 school year but not in the 2007-
08 school year.
3
Author’s calculation based on data from the Arizona Department of Revenue, Office of Research and Analysis,
“Corporate income Tax Credit for Contributions to School Tuition Organizations,” 2006 and 2007 reports,
http://www.azdor.gov/ResearchStats/corporateprivateschoolmenu.htm.
4
A school tuition organization (STO) is defined as “a charitable organization in this state that both: (a) Is exempt from
federal taxation under section 501(c) (3) of the internal revenue code and that allocates ninety per cent of its annual revenue
for educational scholarships or tuition grants to children to allow them to attend any qualified school of their parents’
choice. (b) Provides educational scholarships or tuition grants to students without limiting availability to only students of
one school.” See A.R.S. § 43-1183.Q.2, “Credit for contributions to school tuition organization; definitions,”
http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/43/01183.htm&Title=43&DocType=ARS.
5
Vicki E. Murray, “Fiscal Analysis of Arizona’s Corporate Tax Credit Scholarship Program,” prepared for the Institute for
Justice in October 2006 and used in the successful legal defense of the program in Green v. Garriot. Available on the
Institute for Justice “Arizona Corporate Tax Credit Scholarships” website,
http://www.ij.org/schoolchoice/az_taxcredits3/index.html.
6
For information about the free- and reduced-lunch program, see the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition
Service, “National School Lunch Program” fact sheet, July 2008,
http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/lunch/AboutLunch/NSLPFactSheet.pdf.
7
“Arizona’s corporate income tax credit for contributions to school tuition organizations is governed by A.R.S. § 43-1183.”
See Arizona Department of Revenue, Office of Research and Analysis, “Corporate income Tax Credit for Contributions to
School Tuition Organizations: Reporting for 2006,” August 7, 2007, p. 1,
http://www.azdor.gov/ResearchStats/corporateprivateschoolmenu.htm. For the statute, see:
http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/43/01183.htm&Title=43&DocType=ARS.
8
For ASTOA member STOs, see: http://www.astoa.com/education/sto_roster/.
9
Arizona Department of Revenue, Office of Research and Analysis, “Corporate income Tax Credit for Contributions to
School Tuition Organizations: Reporting for 2006,” August 7, 2007, pp. 2-3,
http://www.azdor.gov/ResearchStats/corporateprivateschoolmenu.htm.
10
For reporting requirements for the corporate tuition tax credit scholarship program, see the Arizona Department of
Revenue, Office of Research and Analysis, “Corporate income Tax Credit for Contributions to School Tuition
Organizations,” 2006 and 2007 reports, p. 1 of each report,
http://www.azdor.gov/ResearchStats/corporateprivateschoolmenu.htm; cf. See A.R.S. § 43-1183.M, “Credit for
contributions to school tuition organization; definitions,”
http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/43/01183.htm&Title=43&DocType=ARS.
11
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, “Income Eligibility Guidelines” website,
http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/governance/notices/iegs/iegs.htm; cf. Arizona Department of Revenue, Office of Research
and Analysis, “Corporate income Tax Credit for Contributions to School Tuition Organizations: Reporting for 2006,”
August 7, 2007, p. 3, http://www.azdor.gov/ResearchStats/corporateprivateschoolmenu.htm.
12
The Arizona Episcopal Schools Foundation awards scholarships used at two private schools. Those schools collect family
income information, and the Arizona Episcopal Schools Foundation was unable to assemble it in time to participate in this
year’s ASTOA survey. They plan to participate in subsequent annual surveys. The Chaparral Mission Scholarship Fund
awarded one scholarship worth $3,000, which was used at the American Indian Christian Mission School. The STO was
unable to obtain family income data by the survey deadline. The following STOs did not respond to requests to participate
in the survey: Cochise Christian School Tuition Organization; Maricopa County Schoolhouse Foundation; and New Valley
Education Partners.
13
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, “Income Eligibility Guidelines” website,
http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/governance/notices/iegs/iegs.htm.

More Related Content

What's hot

CCS_Financial_Aid_Packets_(final)
CCS_Financial_Aid_Packets_(final)CCS_Financial_Aid_Packets_(final)
CCS_Financial_Aid_Packets_(final)Amanda Muñoz
 
Safari CollegePlanningWhitepaper 2015
Safari CollegePlanningWhitepaper 2015Safari CollegePlanningWhitepaper 2015
Safari CollegePlanningWhitepaper 2015Danny Patterson
 
HEDW Regional Conference NYC - Net Price Cost Calculator
HEDW Regional Conference NYC - Net Price Cost CalculatorHEDW Regional Conference NYC - Net Price Cost Calculator
HEDW Regional Conference NYC - Net Price Cost Calculatorernsthe
 
Powerpoint with becky editsfinal10272021approved
Powerpoint with becky editsfinal10272021approvedPowerpoint with becky editsfinal10272021approved
Powerpoint with becky editsfinal10272021approvedAlexander121900
 
Financial aid basics presentation 2013
Financial aid basics presentation 2013Financial aid basics presentation 2013
Financial aid basics presentation 2013Stacey Musulin
 
Icc Financial Aid Night 08 09 Grhs
Icc Financial Aid Night 08 09 GrhsIcc Financial Aid Night 08 09 Grhs
Icc Financial Aid Night 08 09 Grhssmartinson
 
Nov. 10, 2011 Wissahickon HS Financial Aid Night
Nov. 10, 2011 Wissahickon HS Financial Aid NightNov. 10, 2011 Wissahickon HS Financial Aid Night
Nov. 10, 2011 Wissahickon HS Financial Aid NightChristopher
 
Financial Aid Essentials
Financial Aid EssentialsFinancial Aid Essentials
Financial Aid EssentialsDianne Krause
 
High school presentation for 2011 2012
High school presentation for 2011 2012High school presentation for 2011 2012
High school presentation for 2011 2012mr.coker.ehs
 
FA_At a Glance_Brochure
FA_At a Glance_BrochureFA_At a Glance_Brochure
FA_At a Glance_BrochureJulie Griffin
 
Financial Aid: The Essentials and then Some
Financial Aid: The Essentials and then SomeFinancial Aid: The Essentials and then Some
Financial Aid: The Essentials and then SomeDianne Krause
 
Highlights of the North Carolina Public School Budget 2018
Highlights of the North Carolina Public School Budget 2018Highlights of the North Carolina Public School Budget 2018
Highlights of the North Carolina Public School Budget 2018Molly Osborne
 
College Funding Strategic Planning
College Funding  Strategic PlanningCollege Funding  Strategic Planning
College Funding Strategic Planningmrbeckerphd
 

What's hot (20)

CCS_Financial_Aid_Packets_(final)
CCS_Financial_Aid_Packets_(final)CCS_Financial_Aid_Packets_(final)
CCS_Financial_Aid_Packets_(final)
 
Safari CollegePlanningWhitepaper 2015
Safari CollegePlanningWhitepaper 2015Safari CollegePlanningWhitepaper 2015
Safari CollegePlanningWhitepaper 2015
 
HEDW Regional Conference NYC - Net Price Cost Calculator
HEDW Regional Conference NYC - Net Price Cost CalculatorHEDW Regional Conference NYC - Net Price Cost Calculator
HEDW Regional Conference NYC - Net Price Cost Calculator
 
Powerpoint with becky editsfinal10272021approved
Powerpoint with becky editsfinal10272021approvedPowerpoint with becky editsfinal10272021approved
Powerpoint with becky editsfinal10272021approved
 
FAFSA Fundamentals
FAFSA FundamentalsFAFSA Fundamentals
FAFSA Fundamentals
 
Financial aid basics presentation 2013
Financial aid basics presentation 2013Financial aid basics presentation 2013
Financial aid basics presentation 2013
 
Icc Financial Aid Night 08 09 Grhs
Icc Financial Aid Night 08 09 GrhsIcc Financial Aid Night 08 09 Grhs
Icc Financial Aid Night 08 09 Grhs
 
Nov. 10, 2011 Wissahickon HS Financial Aid Night
Nov. 10, 2011 Wissahickon HS Financial Aid NightNov. 10, 2011 Wissahickon HS Financial Aid Night
Nov. 10, 2011 Wissahickon HS Financial Aid Night
 
Presentación
PresentaciónPresentación
Presentación
 
Financial Aid Essentials
Financial Aid EssentialsFinancial Aid Essentials
Financial Aid Essentials
 
High school presentation for 2011 2012
High school presentation for 2011 2012High school presentation for 2011 2012
High school presentation for 2011 2012
 
Financial aid 101
Financial aid 101Financial aid 101
Financial aid 101
 
FA_At a Glance_Brochure
FA_At a Glance_BrochureFA_At a Glance_Brochure
FA_At a Glance_Brochure
 
North Carolina School Finance: State and County Funding - Rebecca Troutman
North Carolina School Finance: State and County Funding - Rebecca TroutmanNorth Carolina School Finance: State and County Funding - Rebecca Troutman
North Carolina School Finance: State and County Funding - Rebecca Troutman
 
FAFSA Filing Workshop
FAFSA Filing WorkshopFAFSA Filing Workshop
FAFSA Filing Workshop
 
Financial Aid: The Essentials and then Some
Financial Aid: The Essentials and then SomeFinancial Aid: The Essentials and then Some
Financial Aid: The Essentials and then Some
 
Test Document
Test DocumentTest Document
Test Document
 
Highlights of the North Carolina Public School Budget 2018
Highlights of the North Carolina Public School Budget 2018Highlights of the North Carolina Public School Budget 2018
Highlights of the North Carolina Public School Budget 2018
 
College Funding Strategic Planning
College Funding  Strategic PlanningCollege Funding  Strategic Planning
College Funding Strategic Planning
 
Financial Aid
Financial AidFinancial Aid
Financial Aid
 

Viewers also liked

20041012 Murray and Brnovich How the Arizona Constitution Protects Taxpayers ...
20041012 Murray and Brnovich How the Arizona Constitution Protects Taxpayers ...20041012 Murray and Brnovich How the Arizona Constitution Protects Taxpayers ...
20041012 Murray and Brnovich How the Arizona Constitution Protects Taxpayers ...Vicki Alger
 
20140908 Alger Teacher Incentive Pay that Works
20140908 Alger Teacher Incentive Pay that Works20140908 Alger Teacher Incentive Pay that Works
20140908 Alger Teacher Incentive Pay that WorksVicki Alger
 
20080721 The High Price of Failure in California How Inadequate Education Cos...
20080721 The High Price of Failure in California How Inadequate Education Cos...20080721 The High Price of Failure in California How Inadequate Education Cos...
20080721 The High Price of Failure in California How Inadequate Education Cos...Vicki Alger
 
20100914 CA School Finance Center User Guide 200304 to 200708
20100914 CA School Finance Center User Guide 200304 to 20070820100914 CA School Finance Center User Guide 200304 to 200708
20100914 CA School Finance Center User Guide 200304 to 200708Vicki Alger
 
20081001 Murray and Stacey Peeking Behind the Blue Ribbon How the NCLB Blue R...
20081001 Murray and Stacey Peeking Behind the Blue Ribbon How the NCLB Blue R...20081001 Murray and Stacey Peeking Behind the Blue Ribbon How the NCLB Blue R...
20081001 Murray and Stacey Peeking Behind the Blue Ribbon How the NCLB Blue R...Vicki Alger
 
20070713 Empowering Teachers with Choice How a Diversified Education System B...
20070713 Empowering Teachers with Choice How a Diversified Education System B...20070713 Empowering Teachers with Choice How a Diversified Education System B...
20070713 Empowering Teachers with Choice How a Diversified Education System B...Vicki Alger
 
20061105 Murray and Mattix Enable the Disabled An Analysis of the Kentucky St...
20061105 Murray and Mattix Enable the Disabled An Analysis of the Kentucky St...20061105 Murray and Mattix Enable the Disabled An Analysis of the Kentucky St...
20061105 Murray and Mattix Enable the Disabled An Analysis of the Kentucky St...Vicki Alger
 
20100811 Murray (Alger) Foster-Care Opportunity Scholarships
20100811 Murray (Alger) Foster-Care Opportunity Scholarships20100811 Murray (Alger) Foster-Care Opportunity Scholarships
20100811 Murray (Alger) Foster-Care Opportunity ScholarshipsVicki Alger
 
20050317 A Case Study of Arizona’s School District Consolidation Debate SWPSA
20050317 A Case Study of Arizona’s School District Consolidation Debate SWPSA20050317 A Case Study of Arizona’s School District Consolidation Debate SWPSA
20050317 A Case Study of Arizona’s School District Consolidation Debate SWPSAVicki Alger
 
20100101 Murray (Alger) Race to the Top - Can We Compete Nebraska’s Charter S...
20100101 Murray (Alger) Race to the Top - Can We Compete Nebraska’s Charter S...20100101 Murray (Alger) Race to the Top - Can We Compete Nebraska’s Charter S...
20100101 Murray (Alger) Race to the Top - Can We Compete Nebraska’s Charter S...Vicki Alger
 
20090813 Down but Not Out in DC Bi-Partisan, Bi-Cameral Efforts to Continue t...
20090813 Down but Not Out in DC Bi-Partisan, Bi-Cameral Efforts to Continue t...20090813 Down but Not Out in DC Bi-Partisan, Bi-Cameral Efforts to Continue t...
20090813 Down but Not Out in DC Bi-Partisan, Bi-Cameral Efforts to Continue t...Vicki Alger
 
20100921 Murray (Alger) GI Junior Scholarships Expanding Education Options fo...
20100921 Murray (Alger) GI Junior Scholarships Expanding Education Options fo...20100921 Murray (Alger) GI Junior Scholarships Expanding Education Options fo...
20100921 Murray (Alger) GI Junior Scholarships Expanding Education Options fo...Vicki Alger
 
20080827 Demography Is Not Destiny Reform Lessons from Florida on Overcoming ...
20080827 Demography Is Not Destiny Reform Lessons from Florida on Overcoming ...20080827 Demography Is Not Destiny Reform Lessons from Florida on Overcoming ...
20080827 Demography Is Not Destiny Reform Lessons from Florida on Overcoming ...Vicki Alger
 
20131108 Alger Faith-based Schools Their Contributions to American Education,...
20131108 Alger Faith-based Schools Their Contributions to American Education,...20131108 Alger Faith-based Schools Their Contributions to American Education,...
20131108 Alger Faith-based Schools Their Contributions to American Education,...Vicki Alger
 
20060314 Murray (Alger) Cash for College Bringing Free-market Reform to Highe...
20060314 Murray (Alger) Cash for College Bringing Free-market Reform to Highe...20060314 Murray (Alger) Cash for College Bringing Free-market Reform to Highe...
20060314 Murray (Alger) Cash for College Bringing Free-market Reform to Highe...Vicki Alger
 

Viewers also liked (15)

20041012 Murray and Brnovich How the Arizona Constitution Protects Taxpayers ...
20041012 Murray and Brnovich How the Arizona Constitution Protects Taxpayers ...20041012 Murray and Brnovich How the Arizona Constitution Protects Taxpayers ...
20041012 Murray and Brnovich How the Arizona Constitution Protects Taxpayers ...
 
20140908 Alger Teacher Incentive Pay that Works
20140908 Alger Teacher Incentive Pay that Works20140908 Alger Teacher Incentive Pay that Works
20140908 Alger Teacher Incentive Pay that Works
 
20080721 The High Price of Failure in California How Inadequate Education Cos...
20080721 The High Price of Failure in California How Inadequate Education Cos...20080721 The High Price of Failure in California How Inadequate Education Cos...
20080721 The High Price of Failure in California How Inadequate Education Cos...
 
20100914 CA School Finance Center User Guide 200304 to 200708
20100914 CA School Finance Center User Guide 200304 to 20070820100914 CA School Finance Center User Guide 200304 to 200708
20100914 CA School Finance Center User Guide 200304 to 200708
 
20081001 Murray and Stacey Peeking Behind the Blue Ribbon How the NCLB Blue R...
20081001 Murray and Stacey Peeking Behind the Blue Ribbon How the NCLB Blue R...20081001 Murray and Stacey Peeking Behind the Blue Ribbon How the NCLB Blue R...
20081001 Murray and Stacey Peeking Behind the Blue Ribbon How the NCLB Blue R...
 
20070713 Empowering Teachers with Choice How a Diversified Education System B...
20070713 Empowering Teachers with Choice How a Diversified Education System B...20070713 Empowering Teachers with Choice How a Diversified Education System B...
20070713 Empowering Teachers with Choice How a Diversified Education System B...
 
20061105 Murray and Mattix Enable the Disabled An Analysis of the Kentucky St...
20061105 Murray and Mattix Enable the Disabled An Analysis of the Kentucky St...20061105 Murray and Mattix Enable the Disabled An Analysis of the Kentucky St...
20061105 Murray and Mattix Enable the Disabled An Analysis of the Kentucky St...
 
20100811 Murray (Alger) Foster-Care Opportunity Scholarships
20100811 Murray (Alger) Foster-Care Opportunity Scholarships20100811 Murray (Alger) Foster-Care Opportunity Scholarships
20100811 Murray (Alger) Foster-Care Opportunity Scholarships
 
20050317 A Case Study of Arizona’s School District Consolidation Debate SWPSA
20050317 A Case Study of Arizona’s School District Consolidation Debate SWPSA20050317 A Case Study of Arizona’s School District Consolidation Debate SWPSA
20050317 A Case Study of Arizona’s School District Consolidation Debate SWPSA
 
20100101 Murray (Alger) Race to the Top - Can We Compete Nebraska’s Charter S...
20100101 Murray (Alger) Race to the Top - Can We Compete Nebraska’s Charter S...20100101 Murray (Alger) Race to the Top - Can We Compete Nebraska’s Charter S...
20100101 Murray (Alger) Race to the Top - Can We Compete Nebraska’s Charter S...
 
20090813 Down but Not Out in DC Bi-Partisan, Bi-Cameral Efforts to Continue t...
20090813 Down but Not Out in DC Bi-Partisan, Bi-Cameral Efforts to Continue t...20090813 Down but Not Out in DC Bi-Partisan, Bi-Cameral Efforts to Continue t...
20090813 Down but Not Out in DC Bi-Partisan, Bi-Cameral Efforts to Continue t...
 
20100921 Murray (Alger) GI Junior Scholarships Expanding Education Options fo...
20100921 Murray (Alger) GI Junior Scholarships Expanding Education Options fo...20100921 Murray (Alger) GI Junior Scholarships Expanding Education Options fo...
20100921 Murray (Alger) GI Junior Scholarships Expanding Education Options fo...
 
20080827 Demography Is Not Destiny Reform Lessons from Florida on Overcoming ...
20080827 Demography Is Not Destiny Reform Lessons from Florida on Overcoming ...20080827 Demography Is Not Destiny Reform Lessons from Florida on Overcoming ...
20080827 Demography Is Not Destiny Reform Lessons from Florida on Overcoming ...
 
20131108 Alger Faith-based Schools Their Contributions to American Education,...
20131108 Alger Faith-based Schools Their Contributions to American Education,...20131108 Alger Faith-based Schools Their Contributions to American Education,...
20131108 Alger Faith-based Schools Their Contributions to American Education,...
 
20060314 Murray (Alger) Cash for College Bringing Free-market Reform to Highe...
20060314 Murray (Alger) Cash for College Bringing Free-market Reform to Highe...20060314 Murray (Alger) Cash for College Bringing Free-market Reform to Highe...
20060314 Murray (Alger) Cash for College Bringing Free-market Reform to Highe...
 

Similar to Arizona Corporate Tax-Credit Scholarship Recipients' Incomes Below Limits

20101011 Murray (Alger) An Analysis of Arizona Individual Income Tax-credit S...
20101011 Murray (Alger) An Analysis of Arizona Individual Income Tax-credit S...20101011 Murray (Alger) An Analysis of Arizona Individual Income Tax-credit S...
20101011 Murray (Alger) An Analysis of Arizona Individual Income Tax-credit S...Vicki Alger
 
Make College a Reality
Make College a RealityMake College a Reality
Make College a RealityLisa Allard
 
Regional Finaid Aid Nights, HS Tour 2010
Regional Finaid Aid Nights,  HS Tour 2010Regional Finaid Aid Nights,  HS Tour 2010
Regional Finaid Aid Nights, HS Tour 2010David Olson
 
20050119 Murray and Aud A Guide to Understanding State Funding of Arizona Pub...
20050119 Murray and Aud A Guide to Understanding State Funding of Arizona Pub...20050119 Murray and Aud A Guide to Understanding State Funding of Arizona Pub...
20050119 Murray and Aud A Guide to Understanding State Funding of Arizona Pub...Vicki Alger
 
Paying for College: From Zero to Hero
Paying for College: From Zero to HeroPaying for College: From Zero to Hero
Paying for College: From Zero to HeroDavid Olson
 
FAFSA Completion Presentation - 2009
FAFSA Completion Presentation - 2009FAFSA Completion Presentation - 2009
FAFSA Completion Presentation - 2009bradleyuniversity
 
CSINA-MLR-00013F_FinancialAidSummary
CSINA-MLR-00013F_FinancialAidSummaryCSINA-MLR-00013F_FinancialAidSummary
CSINA-MLR-00013F_FinancialAidSummaryBrian Boswell
 
Financial Aid Night - 2007
Financial Aid Night - 2007Financial Aid Night - 2007
Financial Aid Night - 2007robertase
 
NRHS Guidance Dept. Financial Aid Presentation07
NRHS Guidance Dept. Financial  Aid Presentation07NRHS Guidance Dept. Financial  Aid Presentation07
NRHS Guidance Dept. Financial Aid Presentation07NRHS
 
Financial Aid Presentation 07
Financial  Aid Presentation 07Financial  Aid Presentation 07
Financial Aid Presentation 07NRHS
 
The Federal Pell Grant Program: Analysis and Options
The Federal Pell Grant Program: Analysis and OptionsThe Federal Pell Grant Program: Analysis and Options
The Federal Pell Grant Program: Analysis and OptionsCongressional Budget Office
 
Guide to Paying for College
Guide to Paying for CollegeGuide to Paying for College
Guide to Paying for CollegemefaMA
 

Similar to Arizona Corporate Tax-Credit Scholarship Recipients' Incomes Below Limits (20)

2016 Federal Budget
2016 Federal Budget2016 Federal Budget
2016 Federal Budget
 
20101011 Murray (Alger) An Analysis of Arizona Individual Income Tax-credit S...
20101011 Murray (Alger) An Analysis of Arizona Individual Income Tax-credit S...20101011 Murray (Alger) An Analysis of Arizona Individual Income Tax-credit S...
20101011 Murray (Alger) An Analysis of Arizona Individual Income Tax-credit S...
 
Alabama Accountability Act - The Basics
Alabama Accountability Act - The BasicsAlabama Accountability Act - The Basics
Alabama Accountability Act - The Basics
 
Make College a Reality
Make College a RealityMake College a Reality
Make College a Reality
 
Blog budget presentation
Blog budget presentationBlog budget presentation
Blog budget presentation
 
Regional Finaid Aid Nights, HS Tour 2010
Regional Finaid Aid Nights,  HS Tour 2010Regional Finaid Aid Nights,  HS Tour 2010
Regional Finaid Aid Nights, HS Tour 2010
 
"How Do I Pay for College?"
"How Do I Pay for College?""How Do I Pay for College?"
"How Do I Pay for College?"
 
20050119 Murray and Aud A Guide to Understanding State Funding of Arizona Pub...
20050119 Murray and Aud A Guide to Understanding State Funding of Arizona Pub...20050119 Murray and Aud A Guide to Understanding State Funding of Arizona Pub...
20050119 Murray and Aud A Guide to Understanding State Funding of Arizona Pub...
 
Paying for College: From Zero to Hero
Paying for College: From Zero to HeroPaying for College: From Zero to Hero
Paying for College: From Zero to Hero
 
State Financial Aid Programs Review
State Financial Aid Programs ReviewState Financial Aid Programs Review
State Financial Aid Programs Review
 
FAFSA Completion Presentation - 2009
FAFSA Completion Presentation - 2009FAFSA Completion Presentation - 2009
FAFSA Completion Presentation - 2009
 
Student Debt: Myths and Facts
Student Debt: Myths and FactsStudent Debt: Myths and Facts
Student Debt: Myths and Facts
 
Counting Correctly v2
Counting Correctly v2Counting Correctly v2
Counting Correctly v2
 
CSINA-MLR-00013F_FinancialAidSummary
CSINA-MLR-00013F_FinancialAidSummaryCSINA-MLR-00013F_FinancialAidSummary
CSINA-MLR-00013F_FinancialAidSummary
 
Financial Aid Night - 2007
Financial Aid Night - 2007Financial Aid Night - 2007
Financial Aid Night - 2007
 
NRHS Guidance Dept. Financial Aid Presentation07
NRHS Guidance Dept. Financial  Aid Presentation07NRHS Guidance Dept. Financial  Aid Presentation07
NRHS Guidance Dept. Financial Aid Presentation07
 
Financial Aid Presentation 07
Financial  Aid Presentation 07Financial  Aid Presentation 07
Financial Aid Presentation 07
 
Benchmarks square
Benchmarks squareBenchmarks square
Benchmarks square
 
The Federal Pell Grant Program: Analysis and Options
The Federal Pell Grant Program: Analysis and OptionsThe Federal Pell Grant Program: Analysis and Options
The Federal Pell Grant Program: Analysis and Options
 
Guide to Paying for College
Guide to Paying for CollegeGuide to Paying for College
Guide to Paying for College
 

Arizona Corporate Tax-Credit Scholarship Recipients' Incomes Below Limits

  • 1. The Arizona School Tuition Organization Association Survey of Corporate Tuition Tax-Credit Scholarship Recipients’ Family Income: School Years 2006-07 and 2007-08 By Vicki E. Murray, Ph.D.* Executive Summary Arizona school tuition organizations (STOs) participating in the corporate tuition tax-credit scholarship program are required by law to submit annual reports to the Arizona Department of Revenue, including verification of a completed independent review of financial statements. The law, however, does not require that participating STOs report scholarship recipients’ annual family income. The Arizona School Tuition Organization Association (ASTOA) therefore decided to conduct voluntary annual surveys of participating STOs to determine the family income level of students being served. Survey results indicate that family income of corporate tax-credit scholarship recipients for the 2006- 07 and 2007-08 school years did not exceed income eligibility limits. For the 2006-07 school year the average scholarship family earned $28,458, below the allowable annual income limit of $68,450. The average scholarship family earned $35,533 during 2007-08 school year, also below the annual income limit of $70,676.1 A total of 19 STOs have awarded corporate tuition tax-credit scholarships since the program’s inception in September 2006.2 All but six STOs distributing scholarship donations for the 2006-07 or 2007-08 school years participated in the ASTOA voluntary survey of scholarship recipients’ family income. Those STOs account for 97 percent of all scholarship donations distributed for the 2006-07 and 2007-08 school years.3 Three of the four STOs awarding scholarships in the 2006-07 school year participated in the ASTOA survey and accounted for 95 percent of all scholarship donations distributed that school year. Fourteen of the 19 STOs awarding scholarships in the 2007-08 school year participated in the ASTOA survey and accounted for 98 percent of all scholarship donations distributed that school year. The Arizona Corporate Tax-Credit Scholarship Program On June 21, 2006, Arizona adopted a corporate tax-credit scholarship program that allows businesses to take credits against their state taxes for contributions to 501(c)(3) non-profit charitable organizations that raise money for scholarships, called school tuition organizations (STOs).4 The program went into effect on September 21, 2006, and will be up for renewal on June 30, 2011. In fiscal year 2007 (corresponding to the 2006-07 school year), aggregate corporate tax credits cannot exceed $10 million. Each year thereafter, the aggregate tax-credit cap is increased by 20 percent, which amounts to $12 million in fiscal year 2008 (corresponding to the 2007-08 school year), increasing to $20.7 million in fiscal year 2011 (corresponding with the 2010-11 school year).5 Public school students and students entering kindergarten are eligible for corporate tuition tax-credit scholarships if their families’ annual incomes do not exceed 185 percent of the income level required to qualify for the federal free- or reduced-price lunch program.6 * Vicki E. Murray, Ph.D., is Senior Policy Fellow in Education Studies at the Pacific Research Institute in Sacramento, California. 1
  • 2. About the ASTOA Survey Arizona STOs participating in the corporate tuition tax-credit scholarship program are required by law to submit annual reports to the state revenue department, including information about contributions received, scholarships awarded, and verification of a completed independent review of financial statements.7 The law, however, does not require participating STOs to include information about scholarship recipients’ annual family income. In June 2008 the Arizona School Tuition Organization Association (ASTOA) decided to begin conducting voluntary annual surveys of STOs participating corporate tax-credit scholarship program, including non-ASTOA member STOs, to make information about scholarship recipients’ family income public (Reproduced in the Appendix).8 This analysis examines family income of students receiving scholarships in the 2006-07 and 2007-08 school years. Two school years are included in this analysis, while subsequent surveys will cover only one school year. Because the program became operational on September 21, 2006, STOs had only three months (through December 31, 2006) to collect donations. Only four STOs distributed scholarships for the 2006-07 school year given the brief time to collect and distribute corporate scholarship donations. Most participating STOs opted to wait until the 2007-08 school year to distribute scholarship donations raised in late 2006 and 2007.9 Subsequent annual surveys will examine family income of students receiving corporate tax-credit scholarships in school years 2008-09 through 2010-11. How the ASTOA Survey Analysis Differs from Arizona Department of Revenue Annual Reports The information in this analysis was provided by STOs participating in an email survey conducted from July 1, 2008, through August 1, 2008. This deadline was subsequently extended to August 15, 2008, to allow more interested STOs to collect the necessary information, beginning with the family incomes of students receiving corporate tax-credit scholarships. Since the ASTOA survey focuses on family income of corporate tax-credit scholarship recipients, the time frame covered is a given school year, not calendar or fiscal year in which school years overlap. Using a different time frame than analyses like the Arizona Department of Revenue annual reports means the number of scholarships and recipients identified will differ. In addition to the time period covered, the number of scholarship recipients reported by STOs for the ASTOA survey may exceed the number identified by the Arizona Department of Revenue because many STOs award scholarships in lump-sum amounts to families for two or more children. Thus the number of scholarships awarded by STOs may be less than the number of actual scholarship recipients. To ensure the most accurate number of actual scholarship recipients and determine whether their families’ incomes meet the income eligibility requirements, which depends on family size, ASTOA survey participants were asked to break down lump-sum scholarship awards used by two or more siblings from the same families. The governing statute does not expressly account for this possibility in its reporting requirements.10 The number of actual scholarship recipients also affects the average scholarship amounts awarded by STOs. Again, when lump-sum awards are made to two or more siblings from a single family, the number of actual scholarship recipients is greater than the number of scholarships STOs award. Because the ASTOA survey divides the total value of scholarships awarded by a higher number of actual recipients, average scholarship amounts reported in this analysis may be lower in some cases than those reported by the Arizona Department of Revenue. 2
  • 3. Average Family Income: 2006-07 School Year As previously explained, given the limited time to collect and distribute corporate tax-credit scholarship donations from September 21 to December 31, 2006, only four STOs awarded corporate tax-credit scholarship for the 2006-07 school year. The three participating STOs accounted for 95 percent of all scholarship donations distributed that school year. To be eligible for a corporate tax- credit scholarship, a student’s family income cannot exceed 185 percent of the income limit making a student eligible for reduced-price meals under the national school lunch program. For a family of four, this amount was $68,450 for the 2006-07 school year.11 The average family income of scholarship recipients that school year was $28,458, and the average family size was four. Table 1: Average Family Income of Scholarship Recipients, School Year 2006-07 STO City SY Scholarship Used Average Family Income of Scholarship Recipients Average Family Size of Scholarship Recipients Average Scholarship Amount # Scholarship Recipients Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of Tucson Tucson 2006-07 $29,871 4 $4,258 55 Cheder Scholarship Organization Tucson 2006-07 $21,939 4 $2,875 4 Cochise Christian STO Hereford 2006-07 * * * * Institute for Better Education Tucson 2006-07 $33,563 4 $2,368 5 Source: Author’s table based on data from the ASTOA voluntary survey. Notes: 1. “SY” stands for school year. “STO” stands for school tuition organization. 2. The Cochise Christian School Tuition Organization did not respond to requests to participate in the survey; therefore average family size and income data were not available, indicated by the asterisk (*). 3. The number of scholarship recipients in this survey may exceed the number identified by the Arizona Department of Revenue. Many STOs award scholarships in lump-sum amounts to families for two or more children. Thus the number of scholarships awarded may not necessarily equal the number of actual scholarship recipients. ASTOA survey participants were asked to break down lump-sum scholarship awards to be used by siblings from the same families. In instances where precise amounts were unavailable, STOs provided average scholarship awards based on the lump-sum award amount and the number of siblings. 4. The average scholarship amounts in the ASTOA survey may differ from those reported by the Arizona Department of Revenue because of the different methodology used to identify the number of actual scholarship recipients, as described in note 3. 5. Another methodological difference between the ASTOA survey and the Arizona Department of Revenue annual reports is that the ASTOA survey covers scholarships awarded during school years, not calendar or fiscal years, which affect both the average scholarship amounts and the number of scholarship recipients. 6. The Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of Tucson was not included in the Arizona Department of Revenue’s 2006 Annual Report because of the different reporting time period covered. Average Family Income: 2007-08 School Year Most STOs began collecting corporate donations in 2006 and distributed scholarships for the 2007-08 school year. Of the 19 STOs awarding corporate tax-credit scholarships that school year, 14 participated in the ASTOA survey and accounted for 98 percent of all scholarship donations distributed that school year. Two STOs were not able to provide complete data by the survey deadline, and three STOs did not respond to requests to participate in the survey.12 Again, to be eligible for a corporate tax-credit scholarship, a student’s family income cannot exceed 185 percent of the income limit making a student eligible for reduced-price meals under the national school lunch program. For a 3
  • 4. family of four, this amount was $70,676 for the 2007-08 school year.13 The average family income of scholarship recipients that school year was $35,533, and the average family size was four. Table 2: Average Family Income of Scholarship Recipients, School Year 2007-08 STO City SY Scholarshi p Used Average Family Income of Scholarshi p Recipients Average Family Size of Scholarshi p Recipients Average Scholarshi p Amount # Scholarshi p Recipients Arizona Corporate Scholarship Fund Mesa 2007-08 $39,180 4 $225 3 Arizona Episcopal Schools Foundation Tucson 2007-08 * * * * Arizona School Choice Trust Glendale 2007-08 $44,000 4 $2,103 409 Brophy Community Foundation Phoenix 2007-08 $34,846 5 $2,025 119 Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of Phoenix Phoenix 2007-08 $36,968 4 $2,500 517 Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of Tucson Tucson 2007-08 $34,475 4 $3,037 345 Chaparral Mission Scholarship Fund Scottsdal e 2007-08 * * $3,000 * Cheder Scholarship Organization Tucson 2007-08 $19,840 3 $4,160 10 Christian Scholarship Fund of Arizona Tucson 2007-08 * * * * Cochise Christian STO Hereford 2007-08 * * * * Flagstaff Christian Scholarship Fund Flagstaff 2007-08 $42,673 5 $2,873 44 Institute for Better Education Tucson 2007-08 $25,392 4 $3,565 16 Jewish Tuition Organization Scottsdal e 2007-08 $34,696 4 $3,750 6 Maricopa County Schoolhouse Foundation Phoenix 2007-08 * * * * New Valley Education Partners Scottsdal e 2007-08 * * * * Prescott Christian School Scholarship Foundation Prescott 2007-08 $31,278 5 $1,400 18 School Choice Arizona Chandler 2007-08 $39,392 5 $2,296 345 School Tuition Association of Yuma, Inc. Yuma 2007-08 $39,531 4 $735 16 Tuition Organization for Private Schools Mesa 2007-08 $38,787 5 $1,575 12 Source: Author’s table based on data from the ASTOA voluntary survey. Notes: 1. “SY” stands for school year. “STO” stands for school tuition organization. 2. Average family sizes and income data are not available, indicated by the asterisk (*). The Arizona Episcopal Schools Foundation wanted to participate in the ASTOA survey but was unable to supply the necessary data by the survey deadline. They plan to participate in future annual ASTOA surveys. The Chaparral Mission Scholarship Fund awarded one scholarship worth $3,000, which was used at the American Indian Christian Mission School. The STO was unable to obtain family income data by the survey deadline. The following STOs did not respond to requests to participate in the survey: Cochise Christian School Tuition Organization; Maricopa County Schoolhouse Foundation; and New Valley Education Partners. 3. The number of scholarship recipients in this survey may exceed the number identified by the Arizona Department of Revenue. Many STOs award scholarships in lump-sum amounts to families for two or more children. Thus the number of scholarships awarded may not necessarily equal the number of actual scholarship recipients. ASTOA survey participants were asked to break down lump-sum scholarship awards to be used by siblings from the same families. In instances where precise amounts were unavailable, STOs provided average scholarship awards based on the lump-sum award amount and the number of siblings. 4. The average scholarship amounts in the ASTOA survey may differ from those reported by the Arizona Department of Revenue because of the different methodology used to identify the number of actual scholarship recipients, as described in note 3. 5. Another methodological difference between the ASTOA survey and the Arizona Department of Revenue annual reports is that the ASTOA survey covers scholarships awarded during school years, not calendar or fiscal years, which affect both the average scholarship amounts and the number of scholarship recipients. 4
  • 5. Comparing Average Family Income of Scholarship Recipients to Income Eligibility Limits The average scholarship recipient in both school years came from a family of four. For the 2006-07 school year the average scholarship family earned $28,458, compared to the allowable annual income of $68,450 that school year. The average scholarship family earned $35,533 during 2007-08 school year, below the annual income limit of $70,676 that school year. Table 3: Average Family Income and Eligibility Limits Compared, School Years 2006-07 and 2007-08 STO City SY Scholarshi p Used Average Family Income of Scholarship Recipients Average Family Size of Scholarship Recipients Corresponding Income Limit (by SY and Family Size) Arizona Corporate Scholarship Fund Mesa 2007-08 $39,180 4 $70,676 Arizona Episcopal Schools Foundation Tucson 2007-08 * * * Arizona School Choice Trust Glendale 2007-08 $44,000 4 $70,676 Brophy Community Foundation Phoenix 2007-08 $34,846 5 $82,586 Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of Phoenix Phoenix 2007-08 $36,968 4 $70,676 Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of Tucson Tucson 2006-07 $29,871 4 $68,450 Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of Tucson Tucson 2007-08 $35,348 4 $70,676 Chaparral Mission Scholarship Fund Scottsdal e 2007-08 * * * Cheder Scholarship Organization Tucson 2006-07 $21,939 4 $68,450 Cheder Scholarship Organization Tucson 2007-08 $19,840 3 $58,765 Christian Scholarship Fund of Arizona Tucson 2007-08 * * * Cochise Christian STO Hereford 2006-07 * * * Cochise Christian STO Hereford 2007-08 * * * Flagstaff Christian Scholarship Fund Flagstaff 2007-08 $42,673 5 $82,586 Institute for Better Education Tucson 2006-07 $33,563 4 $68,450 Institute for Better Education Tucson 2007-08 $25,392 4 $70,676 Jewish Tuition Organization Scottsdal e 2007-08 $34,696 4 $70,676 Maricopa County Schoolhouse Foundation Phoenix 2007-08 * * * New Valley Education Partners Scottsdal e 2007-08 * * * Prescott Christian School Scholarship Foundation Prescott 2007-08 $31,278 5 $82,586 School Choice Arizona Chandler 2007-08 $39,392 5 $82,586 School Tuition Association of Yuma, Inc. Yuma 2007-08 $39,531 4 $70,676 Tuition Organization for Private Schools Mesa 2007-08 $38,787 5 $82,586 Sources: Author’s table based on data from the ASTOA voluntary survey and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Income Eligibility Guidelines for corresponding school years. Notes: 1. “SY” stands for school year. “STO” stands for school tuition organization. 2. Average family sizes and income data are not available, indicated by the asterisk (*). The Arizona Episcopal Schools Foundation wanted to participate but was unable to supply the necessary data by the survey deadline. They plan to participate in future annual ASTOA surveys. The Chaparral Mission Scholarship Fund awarded one scholarship worth $3,000, which was used at the American Indian Christian Mission School. The STO was unable to obtain family income data by the survey deadline. The following STOs did not respond to requests to participate in the survey: Cochise Christian School Tuition Organization; Maricopa County Schoolhouse Foundation; and New Valley Education Partners. 5
  • 6. 7. The Catholic Tuition Organization of the Diocese of Tucson was not included in the Arizona Department of Revenue’s 2006 Annual Report because of the different reporting time period covered. Conclusion The Arizona School Tuition Organization Association (ASTOA) decided to conduct voluntary annual surveys of participating STOs to determine the income level of the students being served. Participating STOs accounted for 97 percent of all scholarship donations distributed for the 2006-07 and 2007-08 school years. Survey results indicate that family income of corporate tax-credit scholarship recipients for the 2006-07 and 2007-08 school years did not exceed income eligibility limits. For the 2006-07 school year the average scholarship family earned $28,458, which is below the allowable annual income limit of $68,450. The average scholarship family earned $35,533 during 2007-08 school year, also below the annual income limit of $70,676. 6
  • 7. Appendix: Survey ASTOA Corporate Income Tax-Credit Scholarship Survey of Participating Family Income Due by August 1, 2008, to Vicki E. Murray [extended to August 15, 2008] For School Years 2006-07 & 2007-08 Part I: School Tuition Organization Information STO NAME Address City Zip Contact Person Name Contact Person Title Phone Email Website Part II: Scholarship Recipients' Annual Family Incomes & Scholarship Amounts Calendar Year Donations Collected School Year Scholarship Used Family Income of Scholarship Recipient Family Size Recipient Scholarship Amount Notes: [used to break down lump-sum scholarships by the number of sibling recipients] 7
  • 8. 8 Endnotes: 1 For a family of four, 185 percent of the allowable income limit was $$70,675.66 for the 2007-08 school year. The author rounded this figure to $70,676. See the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, “Income Eligibility Guidelines” website, http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/governance/notices/iegs/iegs.htm. The Arizona Department of Revenue calculates this figure at $70,674, likely due to a rounding difference. See the Arizona Department of Revenue, Office of Research and Analysis, “Corporate income Tax Credit for Contributions to School Tuition Organizations: Reporting for 2006,” August 7, 2007, p. 3, http://www.azdor.gov/ResearchStats/corporateprivateschoolmenu.htm. 2 The Cochise Christian School Tuition Organization awarded scholarships in the 2006-07 school year but not in the 2007- 08 school year. 3 Author’s calculation based on data from the Arizona Department of Revenue, Office of Research and Analysis, “Corporate income Tax Credit for Contributions to School Tuition Organizations,” 2006 and 2007 reports, http://www.azdor.gov/ResearchStats/corporateprivateschoolmenu.htm. 4 A school tuition organization (STO) is defined as “a charitable organization in this state that both: (a) Is exempt from federal taxation under section 501(c) (3) of the internal revenue code and that allocates ninety per cent of its annual revenue for educational scholarships or tuition grants to children to allow them to attend any qualified school of their parents’ choice. (b) Provides educational scholarships or tuition grants to students without limiting availability to only students of one school.” See A.R.S. § 43-1183.Q.2, “Credit for contributions to school tuition organization; definitions,” http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/43/01183.htm&Title=43&DocType=ARS. 5 Vicki E. Murray, “Fiscal Analysis of Arizona’s Corporate Tax Credit Scholarship Program,” prepared for the Institute for Justice in October 2006 and used in the successful legal defense of the program in Green v. Garriot. Available on the Institute for Justice “Arizona Corporate Tax Credit Scholarships” website, http://www.ij.org/schoolchoice/az_taxcredits3/index.html. 6 For information about the free- and reduced-lunch program, see the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, “National School Lunch Program” fact sheet, July 2008, http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/lunch/AboutLunch/NSLPFactSheet.pdf. 7 “Arizona’s corporate income tax credit for contributions to school tuition organizations is governed by A.R.S. § 43-1183.” See Arizona Department of Revenue, Office of Research and Analysis, “Corporate income Tax Credit for Contributions to School Tuition Organizations: Reporting for 2006,” August 7, 2007, p. 1, http://www.azdor.gov/ResearchStats/corporateprivateschoolmenu.htm. For the statute, see: http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/43/01183.htm&Title=43&DocType=ARS. 8 For ASTOA member STOs, see: http://www.astoa.com/education/sto_roster/. 9 Arizona Department of Revenue, Office of Research and Analysis, “Corporate income Tax Credit for Contributions to School Tuition Organizations: Reporting for 2006,” August 7, 2007, pp. 2-3, http://www.azdor.gov/ResearchStats/corporateprivateschoolmenu.htm. 10 For reporting requirements for the corporate tuition tax credit scholarship program, see the Arizona Department of Revenue, Office of Research and Analysis, “Corporate income Tax Credit for Contributions to School Tuition Organizations,” 2006 and 2007 reports, p. 1 of each report, http://www.azdor.gov/ResearchStats/corporateprivateschoolmenu.htm; cf. See A.R.S. § 43-1183.M, “Credit for contributions to school tuition organization; definitions,” http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/43/01183.htm&Title=43&DocType=ARS. 11 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, “Income Eligibility Guidelines” website, http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/governance/notices/iegs/iegs.htm; cf. Arizona Department of Revenue, Office of Research and Analysis, “Corporate income Tax Credit for Contributions to School Tuition Organizations: Reporting for 2006,” August 7, 2007, p. 3, http://www.azdor.gov/ResearchStats/corporateprivateschoolmenu.htm. 12 The Arizona Episcopal Schools Foundation awards scholarships used at two private schools. Those schools collect family income information, and the Arizona Episcopal Schools Foundation was unable to assemble it in time to participate in this year’s ASTOA survey. They plan to participate in subsequent annual surveys. The Chaparral Mission Scholarship Fund awarded one scholarship worth $3,000, which was used at the American Indian Christian Mission School. The STO was unable to obtain family income data by the survey deadline. The following STOs did not respond to requests to participate in the survey: Cochise Christian School Tuition Organization; Maricopa County Schoolhouse Foundation; and New Valley Education Partners. 13 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, “Income Eligibility Guidelines” website, http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/governance/notices/iegs/iegs.htm.