This document provides a summary of several case studies related to VAT and property:
1) A company that purchased a property, claimed VAT on costs, then de-registered without opting to tax. On sale after de-registration, it had to repay VAT claimed. Opting to tax would have avoided this.
2) A developer purchased a pub with intent to sell to a housing association. The association issued a certificate preventing VAT recovery. Options discussed to avoid this included selling to a developer or "golden bricking" the property.
3) A developer who converted a pub into flats and houses for sale but then rented them out faced capital goods scheme adjustments each year. Options presented to avoid this included transferring
1. VAT AND PROPERTY – SOME
CASE STUDIES
Clifton Ingram LLP
15 May 2014
2. VAT AND PROPERTY – SOME
CASE STUDIES
These slides are intended for use in connection with the
presentation given on 15 May 2014. No action should
be taken on the basis of information contained in these
slides or in the presentation without obtaining
professional advice specific to the circumstances.
No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person
acting or refraining from action as a result of the material
in these slides or presentation can be accepted by the
speaker or by Terry Dockley & Co Limited.
Copyright 2014, Terry Dockley & Co Limited
3. CASE STUDIES – ISSUES
ADDRESSED
• When does a purchaser need to opt to tax?
• How and when can the capital goods scheme apply?
• What happens on de-registration?
• What sort of buyers can stop a vendor from applying
an option to tax?
• How the Golden Brick works
• Building conversions – what VAT is incurred and can it
be recovered?
• How does the option to tax interact with the TOGC
rules?
• Can you back date an option to tax?
• What are the proper limits to TOGC treatment?
4. CASE STUDY 1
• Sale of industrial unit by
engineering company (“A”)
in March 2012 for £350k
• Bought in June 2008 for
£300k plus VAT
• VAT of £52,500 recovered
by A
• A stopped trading and de-
registered in June 2011
when property still worth
£300k
• Administrator no knowledge
of whether A had opted to
tax
5. WHEN WOULD YOU OPT TO
TAX?
• You can only recover VAT on costs
incurred in making taxable supplies
• If you purchase a commercial building as
an investment and the vendor has opted to
tax, you will usually want to as well
• If you purchase for use in a taxable trade,
you can recover the VAT without opting to
tax
• What about on sale?
6. CAPITAL GOODS SCHEME
• Land and buildings
• Specified categories of expenditure
• Costing £250k or more plus VAT
• Ten-year adjustment period
• Tracks changes in use
(taxable/exempt/non-business)
• Sales
7. CASE STUDY 1– DE-REGISTRATION
• Deemed supply on de-registration
• No option to tax
• So in this case deemed supply was
exempt and 70% of VAT initially recovered
repayable to HMRC on final return
(£36,750)
• If they had opted to tax, then deemed
taxable supply and output tax due on net
realisable value (£60k); no adjustment
8. CASE STUDY 1 - ACTUAL
SALE
• As no option to tax, no further VAT
consequences
• If they had then opted to tax:
– need to re-register and account for VAT on
actual sale price (£70k)
– can claim VAT on de-registration of £60k as
input tax
9. SOME BUYERS WHO CAN
THWART AN OPTION TO TAX
Type of building Certificate?
• Dwellings • None, but the vendor should keep
evidence of buyer’s expressed
intentions
• Relevant residential • As above
• Buildings to be converted
into dwellings
• 1614D
• Land sold to a housing
association to build
dwellings on (after any
necessary demolition work)
• 1614G (case study 2)
• Where anti-avoidance
applies
• Case study available
10. CASE STUDY 2
• 2011 entrepreneur buys
pub for £500k
• 40% of building is a flat
so VAT only paid on 60%
of price (£60k) (using
rateable values)
• No intention to trade but
to do up pub and sell on
with same split
• 2012 selling to Housing
Association with planning
for demolition and rebuild
as dwellings
• Purchaser issues 1614G
11. VAT CONSEQUENCES OF
1614G?
• Exempt sale of property
• Claw back of 90% of VAT on purchase and
all of vendor’s VAT on professional costs
12. SOLUTIONS?
• Sell to a developer
who could use the
planning permission
to build and sell
dwellings zero-rated
to housing
association
• Golden brick it
13. ZERO-RATED SALES
• First sale of a major interest in a
“qualifying building” by “person
constructing” is zero-rated
• Qualifying building is dwelling, relevant
residential or relevant charitable building
• Zero-rating can apply to sale of partly
completed building
• A zero-rated sale is taxable so does not
lead to a capital goods scheme claw back
14. GOLDEN BRICK
• Partly completed
building
– Must be above
foundation level
– Need not be above
ground level
– Digging and
concreting foundations
alone not enough
• Problem with
deposits?
15. DEPOSITS – PROBLEM?
• No tax point until completion so long as
any deposit received as stakeholder
• But does that mean vendor cannot
meanwhile access the deposit to fund
golden brick works?
• At time of deposit the vendor appears to
be selling existing building – exempt not
zero-rated
16. DEPOSITS – THE SOLUTION
• HMRC state that the VAT treatment of the
deposit is determined by reference to the
anticipated state of the asset at the time of
completion
• Contract must make clear that it is a sale
of a major interest in a partly completed
building rather than of land/existing
building
17. BUILDING CONVERSIONS -
QUESTIONS
• Builder buys pub with
top floor manager’s flat
• What VAT rate does he
pay and what can he
recover if
– He renovates and sells
one house
– He renovates the flat
and turns the pub into a
2nd flat and sells 2 flats
– He turns the pub into 2
houses for sale?
18. BUILDING CONVERSIONS –
“ANSWERS”
• One house – work at 20% (not
recoverable)
• Two flats – ground floor work at 5%
(recoverable); upper floor at 20% (not
recoverable)
• Two houses – all work at 5%
– Per HMRC, none recoverable
– Per Tribunal – all recoverable (back claims?)
19. CASE STUDY 3
• Developer buys pub with planning
permission:
– To convert pub into flats
– To build 2 houses in grounds
• Developer fails to sell flats or houses and
grants ASTs
• VAT problems?
• VAT solutions?
20. CASE STUDY 3
• Capital goods scheme adjustments for
each year of the leases within adjustment
period
• Developer should grant major interest in
the properties to own company
• His supply zero-rated
• Exempt supplies made by company with
minimal input tax
• “HMRC approved” VAT planning
21. CASE STUDY 4
• Company granted a lease on a building in
2008
• It opted to tax the building
• In 2012 it sold the building subject to the
lease
• Contract drafted on expectation of TOGC
• The purchasers did not opt to tax
22. THE OPTION TO TAX AND THE
TOGC RULES
• No TOGC on the sale of a building where
vendor has opted to tax unless:
– There is a transfer of a business as a going
concern with the purchaser using the asset in the
same kind of business as the vendor
– The purchaser is or will become VAT-registered
– By completion:
• The purchaser opts to tax
• The purchaser notifies HMRC of that option to tax
• The purchaser notifies the vendor that the option to tax
anti-avoidance rules will not apply
23. CASE STUDY 4 – VAT
CONSEQUENCES FOR VENDOR
• There is a transfer of a property rental
business as a going concern
• Purchaser did not opt to tax, so one of the
conditions not met
• Vendor must charge VAT
24. CASE STUDY 4 – WHAT SHOULD
THE PURCHASER HAVE DONE?
• Purchaser should have registered for VAT,
opted to tax and notified HMRC before
completion so that vendor would not charge
VAT
• Failing that, purchaser should have
registered and opted to tax before any rent
invoices issued. Purchaser could then have
claimed the VAT
• Having done neither, did the purchaser have
any scope to back date the option to tax?
25. “BACKDATING” THE OPTION
TO TAX
• Option to tax a 2-stage process
• Belated notification
• What it means
• When might HMRC allow it?
– Where VAT has been charged on rents
– Not to make a TOGC after the event (but policy
apparently inconsistent)
– Not where landlord has refunded VAT
• “Retrospective” option to tax – “illegal”,
illogical and not HMRC policy
26. CASE STUDY 5
• A owns freehold in a hotel
• B has an operating lease
from A and runs the hotel
• A and B are in common
ownership
• C wants to buy the
freehold and run the hotel
• How must C structure its
offer to achieve TOGC and
limit SDLT if:
– A and B are not in a group
registration?
– A and B are in a group
registration?
27. WHAT ARE THE PROPER LIMITS
TO TOGC TREATMENT?
• Zita Modes (2003)
• Robinson Family (June 2011)
• Christel Schriever (November 2011)
• Revenue Briefs 30/12 and 08/13
28. ZITA MODES
• EU VAT Directive allows member states to
“de supply” TOGCs
• If member state does so, they can only
exclude transfers where transferee is not a
taxable person or only acts as such in
relation to some of his activities
• Designed to take away burden of VAT where
it would be fully recoverable anyway
• Only applies to transfers of business/part of a
business and not to asset transfers or
transfers with view to liquidation
29. CHRISTEL SCHRIEVER -
FACTS
• CS ran sports equipment
shop from her own
premises
• Sold stock and fittings to
own company as TOGC
• Granted lease on premises
to same company for
indefinite period but
subject to cancellation at
short notice
• Tax Office assessed on
basis no TOGC because
premises an essential
component of business
30. CHRISTEL SCHRIEVER - CJEC
• Referred to reasoning in Zita Modes
• Nothing to say successor must own
premises as well as business
• Premises may be leased, or successor
may have own premises
31. ROBINSON FAMILY
• Per 700/9 no TOGC if you grant a lease as it is a new asset
• Robinson Family Limited – changed policy
• Appellant used Unit 3 as letting business
• Unit 3 held on 125-year lease
• Appellant could only dispose of business by granting shorter
sublease
• Per Tribunal this was TOGC
• HMRC now accept TOGC, provided value of asset retained
not more than 1% of total value before transfer
• HMRC have now agreed to SDLT refunds
• HMRC have still not addressed impact on:
– Property transfers by other types of business
– Surrenders