SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DAVID HYKE, Individually and as
the Personal Representative of the
Estate of Floren Hyke, DANA
SAMWAY, and DIXIE LANDRETH
Plaintiffs,
v.
OHIO NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 8:10CV263
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(Filing No. 58). The Court incorporates herein by reference its Memorandum and Order of
July 20, 2011 (Filing No. 42), in which the Court found that Defendant Ohio National Life
Insurance Company (“ONL”) breached the terms of a life insurance contract with decedent
Floren Hyke by failing to provide him with notice of the premium required to maintain his
term life insurance coverage for the contract year commencing August 14, 2008. The Court
noted that issues of fact remained for trial regarding Plaintiffs’ entitlement to recover
proceeds from the term life insurance rider, specifically whether Hyke could and would have
paid the premium and not defaulted if notice had been provided.
Plaintiffs’ Index of Evidence (Filing No. 59) contains substantial and uncontroverted
evidence that Floren Hyke had the wherewithal to pay the premium and the motive and
intent to do so. ONL concedes that Floren Hyke had the wherewithal to pay the premium,
and does not dispute that he had the motive and intent to pay it. ONL also concedes that
the net amount due under the term life insurance policy is $93,374.13, if the Court’s earlier
8:10-cv-00263-LSC-FG3 Doc # 64 Filed: 11/15/11 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 571
2
ruling, finding that ONL had a duty to send Floren Hyke a notice of the premium, is correct.
(Defendant’s Brief, Filing No. 62.)
Because there are no issues remaining for trial in this case, judgment will be entered
for the Plaintiffs and against the Defendant in the amount of $93,374.13, plus costs,
including a reasonable attorney’s fee pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-359 (Reissue 2004).
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 58) is granted;
2. A Separate Judgment will be entered in favor of Plaintiffs David Hyke,
individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Floren Hyke,
Dana Samway, and Dixie Landreth, in the amount of $93,374.13, plus costs,
including a reasonable attorney’s fee pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-359
(Reissue 2004); and
3. Plaintiffs may submit their motion for attorney’s fees no later than fourteen
(14) days after entry of judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2).
DATED this 15 day of November, 2011.th
BY THE COURT:
s/Laurie Smith Camp
United States District Judge
8:10-cv-00263-LSC-FG3 Doc # 64 Filed: 11/15/11 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 572

More Related Content

What's hot

King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421Roger Valdez
 
Sulphur Moutain vs. John Redmond, et al - B238767
Sulphur Moutain vs. John Redmond, et al - B238767Sulphur Moutain vs. John Redmond, et al - B238767
Sulphur Moutain vs. John Redmond, et al - B238767jamesmaredmond
 
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-awayDoc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-awaymalp2009
 
National union v. redbox order on msj august 7 2014 wd wa
National union v. redbox order on msj august 7 2014 wd waNational union v. redbox order on msj august 7 2014 wd wa
National union v. redbox order on msj august 7 2014 wd waSeth Row
 
Motion Reconsideration
Motion ReconsiderationMotion Reconsideration
Motion Reconsiderationguest9becd34
 
Usdc 154 order on msj
Usdc 154 order on msjUsdc 154 order on msj
Usdc 154 order on msjSeth Row
 
Sc allahabad hc bail order may 25
Sc allahabad hc bail order may 25Sc allahabad hc bail order may 25
Sc allahabad hc bail order may 25sabrangsabrang
 
Sample Bail Bond Related Criminal Law Motions
Sample Bail Bond Related Criminal Law MotionsSample Bail Bond Related Criminal Law Motions
Sample Bail Bond Related Criminal Law MotionsSamuel Partida
 
09.06.12 motion appointment receiver [conformed]
09.06.12   motion appointment receiver [conformed]09.06.12   motion appointment receiver [conformed]
09.06.12 motion appointment receiver [conformed]jamesmaredmond
 
Time Barred Mortgages in Bankruptcy 2.0
Time Barred Mortgages in Bankruptcy 2.0Time Barred Mortgages in Bankruptcy 2.0
Time Barred Mortgages in Bankruptcy 2.0Joseph Towne
 
Sample California motion to compel responses to requests for production of do...
Sample California motion to compel responses to requests for production of do...Sample California motion to compel responses to requests for production of do...
Sample California motion to compel responses to requests for production of do...LegalDocsPro
 
Government’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severance
Government’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severanceGovernment’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severance
Government’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severanceCocoselul Inaripat
 
Doc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtor
Doc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtorDoc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtor
Doc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtormalp2009
 
United states’ response to motion for return of property
United states’ response to motion for return of propertyUnited states’ response to motion for return of property
United states’ response to motion for return of propertyCocoselul Inaripat
 

What's hot (19)

10000001203
1000000120310000001203
10000001203
 
10000001206
1000000120610000001206
10000001206
 
10000001208
1000000120810000001208
10000001208
 
10000001205
1000000120510000001205
10000001205
 
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421
 
Sulphur Moutain vs. John Redmond, et al - B238767
Sulphur Moutain vs. John Redmond, et al - B238767Sulphur Moutain vs. John Redmond, et al - B238767
Sulphur Moutain vs. John Redmond, et al - B238767
 
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-awayDoc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
 
National union v. redbox order on msj august 7 2014 wd wa
National union v. redbox order on msj august 7 2014 wd waNational union v. redbox order on msj august 7 2014 wd wa
National union v. redbox order on msj august 7 2014 wd wa
 
Motion Reconsideration
Motion ReconsiderationMotion Reconsideration
Motion Reconsideration
 
Usdc 154 order on msj
Usdc 154 order on msjUsdc 154 order on msj
Usdc 154 order on msj
 
Gmo temporary injunction
Gmo temporary injunctionGmo temporary injunction
Gmo temporary injunction
 
Sc allahabad hc bail order may 25
Sc allahabad hc bail order may 25Sc allahabad hc bail order may 25
Sc allahabad hc bail order may 25
 
Sample Bail Bond Related Criminal Law Motions
Sample Bail Bond Related Criminal Law MotionsSample Bail Bond Related Criminal Law Motions
Sample Bail Bond Related Criminal Law Motions
 
09.06.12 motion appointment receiver [conformed]
09.06.12   motion appointment receiver [conformed]09.06.12   motion appointment receiver [conformed]
09.06.12 motion appointment receiver [conformed]
 
Time Barred Mortgages in Bankruptcy 2.0
Time Barred Mortgages in Bankruptcy 2.0Time Barred Mortgages in Bankruptcy 2.0
Time Barred Mortgages in Bankruptcy 2.0
 
Sample California motion to compel responses to requests for production of do...
Sample California motion to compel responses to requests for production of do...Sample California motion to compel responses to requests for production of do...
Sample California motion to compel responses to requests for production of do...
 
Government’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severance
Government’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severanceGovernment’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severance
Government’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severance
 
Doc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtor
Doc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtorDoc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtor
Doc770 order confirming trustee's amended plan of liquidation for the debtor
 
United states’ response to motion for return of property
United states’ response to motion for return of propertyUnited states’ response to motion for return of property
United states’ response to motion for return of property
 

Similar to US Court Grants Summary Judgment in Insurance Dispute

Order Denying Injunction Against CDC Eviction Ban
Order Denying Injunction Against CDC Eviction BanOrder Denying Injunction Against CDC Eviction Ban
Order Denying Injunction Against CDC Eviction BanRoger Valdez
 
2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....
2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....
2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....Karol Pessin
 
Saud_Summary_Experience__2016
Saud_Summary_Experience__2016Saud_Summary_Experience__2016
Saud_Summary_Experience__2016Saud A.H. Khokhar
 
Federal Court Denying Motion by Satish Vuppalapati, Madhavi Vuppalapati and A...
Federal Court Denying Motion by Satish Vuppalapati, Madhavi Vuppalapati and A...Federal Court Denying Motion by Satish Vuppalapati, Madhavi Vuppalapati and A...
Federal Court Denying Motion by Satish Vuppalapati, Madhavi Vuppalapati and A...mh37o
 
December 2012 Reinsurance Newsletter
December 2012 Reinsurance NewsletterDecember 2012 Reinsurance Newsletter
December 2012 Reinsurance NewsletterPatton Boggs LLP
 
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & Mootness
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & MootnessFLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & Mootness
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & MootnessPollard PLLC
 
Former State Rep Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy
Former State Rep Pleads Guilty to  ConspiracyFormer State Rep Pleads Guilty to  Conspiracy
Former State Rep Pleads Guilty to ConspiracyAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
Nestlehutt Order Ga Caps
Nestlehutt Order Ga CapsNestlehutt Order Ga Caps
Nestlehutt Order Ga Capsmzamoralaw
 
Washington Court Holds Stipulated Covenant Judgment Sets Minimum Amount of Da...
Washington Court Holds Stipulated Covenant Judgment Sets Minimum Amount of Da...Washington Court Holds Stipulated Covenant Judgment Sets Minimum Amount of Da...
Washington Court Holds Stipulated Covenant Judgment Sets Minimum Amount of Da...NationalUnderwriter
 
Assignment on :Rule of the court of bangladesh regarding the jurisdiction in ...
Assignment on :Rule of the court of bangladesh regarding the jurisdiction in ...Assignment on :Rule of the court of bangladesh regarding the jurisdiction in ...
Assignment on :Rule of the court of bangladesh regarding the jurisdiction in ...Asian Paint Bangladesh Ltd
 
130920 Jenkins_Amicus_Maryland_Animal_Law_Center (to file) (1) (3)
130920 Jenkins_Amicus_Maryland_Animal_Law_Center (to file) (1) (3)130920 Jenkins_Amicus_Maryland_Animal_Law_Center (to file) (1) (3)
130920 Jenkins_Amicus_Maryland_Animal_Law_Center (to file) (1) (3)Anne Benaroya
 
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Steven de Koenigswarter and Associated En...
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Steven de Koenigswarter and Associated En...Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Steven de Koenigswarter and Associated En...
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Steven de Koenigswarter and Associated En...Theworld Crawler
 

Similar to US Court Grants Summary Judgment in Insurance Dispute (20)

Order Denying Injunction Against CDC Eviction Ban
Order Denying Injunction Against CDC Eviction BanOrder Denying Injunction Against CDC Eviction Ban
Order Denying Injunction Against CDC Eviction Ban
 
2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....
2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....
2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Intellectual Property IV Supporting Doc: City of Hope v....
 
Saud_Summary_Experience__2016
Saud_Summary_Experience__2016Saud_Summary_Experience__2016
Saud_Summary_Experience__2016
 
Doc. 131
Doc. 131Doc. 131
Doc. 131
 
Federal Court Denying Motion by Satish Vuppalapati, Madhavi Vuppalapati and A...
Federal Court Denying Motion by Satish Vuppalapati, Madhavi Vuppalapati and A...Federal Court Denying Motion by Satish Vuppalapati, Madhavi Vuppalapati and A...
Federal Court Denying Motion by Satish Vuppalapati, Madhavi Vuppalapati and A...
 
Georgia Tennessee Hot issues
Georgia Tennessee Hot issuesGeorgia Tennessee Hot issues
Georgia Tennessee Hot issues
 
December 2012 Reinsurance Newsletter
December 2012 Reinsurance NewsletterDecember 2012 Reinsurance Newsletter
December 2012 Reinsurance Newsletter
 
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & Mootness
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & MootnessFLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & Mootness
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & Mootness
 
Former State Rep Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy
Former State Rep Pleads Guilty to  ConspiracyFormer State Rep Pleads Guilty to  Conspiracy
Former State Rep Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy
 
Nestlehutt Order Ga Caps
Nestlehutt Order Ga CapsNestlehutt Order Ga Caps
Nestlehutt Order Ga Caps
 
Washington Court Holds Stipulated Covenant Judgment Sets Minimum Amount of Da...
Washington Court Holds Stipulated Covenant Judgment Sets Minimum Amount of Da...Washington Court Holds Stipulated Covenant Judgment Sets Minimum Amount of Da...
Washington Court Holds Stipulated Covenant Judgment Sets Minimum Amount of Da...
 
Jail writ- J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY
Jail writ- J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEYJail writ- J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY
Jail writ- J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY
 
Jail writ-J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY
Jail writ-J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEYJail writ-J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY
Jail writ-J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY
 
Assignment on :Rule of the court of bangladesh regarding the jurisdiction in ...
Assignment on :Rule of the court of bangladesh regarding the jurisdiction in ...Assignment on :Rule of the court of bangladesh regarding the jurisdiction in ...
Assignment on :Rule of the court of bangladesh regarding the jurisdiction in ...
 
130920 Jenkins_Amicus_Maryland_Animal_Law_Center (to file) (1) (3)
130920 Jenkins_Amicus_Maryland_Animal_Law_Center (to file) (1) (3)130920 Jenkins_Amicus_Maryland_Animal_Law_Center (to file) (1) (3)
130920 Jenkins_Amicus_Maryland_Animal_Law_Center (to file) (1) (3)
 
Defendants Closing Argument Brief
Defendants Closing Argument BriefDefendants Closing Argument Brief
Defendants Closing Argument Brief
 
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Steven de Koenigswarter and Associated En...
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Steven de Koenigswarter and Associated En...Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Steven de Koenigswarter and Associated En...
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Steven de Koenigswarter and Associated En...
 
Divorce: Cancel that line of credit
Divorce: Cancel that line of credit Divorce: Cancel that line of credit
Divorce: Cancel that line of credit
 
Make whole.ga
Make whole.gaMake whole.ga
Make whole.ga
 
Ethics For Florida Probate Lawyers
Ethics For Florida Probate LawyersEthics For Florida Probate Lawyers
Ethics For Florida Probate Lawyers
 

US Court Grants Summary Judgment in Insurance Dispute

  • 1. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DAVID HYKE, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Floren Hyke, DANA SAMWAY, and DIXIE LANDRETH Plaintiffs, v. OHIO NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 8:10CV263 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 58). The Court incorporates herein by reference its Memorandum and Order of July 20, 2011 (Filing No. 42), in which the Court found that Defendant Ohio National Life Insurance Company (“ONL”) breached the terms of a life insurance contract with decedent Floren Hyke by failing to provide him with notice of the premium required to maintain his term life insurance coverage for the contract year commencing August 14, 2008. The Court noted that issues of fact remained for trial regarding Plaintiffs’ entitlement to recover proceeds from the term life insurance rider, specifically whether Hyke could and would have paid the premium and not defaulted if notice had been provided. Plaintiffs’ Index of Evidence (Filing No. 59) contains substantial and uncontroverted evidence that Floren Hyke had the wherewithal to pay the premium and the motive and intent to do so. ONL concedes that Floren Hyke had the wherewithal to pay the premium, and does not dispute that he had the motive and intent to pay it. ONL also concedes that the net amount due under the term life insurance policy is $93,374.13, if the Court’s earlier 8:10-cv-00263-LSC-FG3 Doc # 64 Filed: 11/15/11 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 571
  • 2. 2 ruling, finding that ONL had a duty to send Floren Hyke a notice of the premium, is correct. (Defendant’s Brief, Filing No. 62.) Because there are no issues remaining for trial in this case, judgment will be entered for the Plaintiffs and against the Defendant in the amount of $93,374.13, plus costs, including a reasonable attorney’s fee pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-359 (Reissue 2004). IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 58) is granted; 2. A Separate Judgment will be entered in favor of Plaintiffs David Hyke, individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Floren Hyke, Dana Samway, and Dixie Landreth, in the amount of $93,374.13, plus costs, including a reasonable attorney’s fee pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-359 (Reissue 2004); and 3. Plaintiffs may submit their motion for attorney’s fees no later than fourteen (14) days after entry of judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2). DATED this 15 day of November, 2011.th BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge 8:10-cv-00263-LSC-FG3 Doc # 64 Filed: 11/15/11 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 572