Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
ROBERT ITO FARM, INC., ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
COUNTY OF ...
2
Proposed Order. The Stipulation and Proposed Order shall be submitted to the
Court on or before December 1, 2014, and sh...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Gmo temporary injunction

2,331 views

Published on

GMO temporary injunction.

Published in: News & Politics
  • Be the first to comment

Gmo temporary injunction

  1. 1. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII ROBERT ITO FARM, INC., ET AL., Plaintiffs, vs. COUNTY OF MAUI, Defendant. ______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV. NO. 14-00511 BMK ORDER ORDER A Status Conference was held on November 13, 2014. Margery S. Bronster and Kenneth S. Robbins appeared by phone on behalf of Robert Ito Farm, Inc.; Hawaii Farm Bureau Federation, Maui County; Molokai Chamber of Commerce; Monsanto Company; Agrigenetics, Inc., doing business as Mycogen Seeds; Concerned Citizens of Molokai and Maui; Friendly Isle Auto Parts & Supplies, Inc.; New Horizon Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Makoa Trucking and Services; and Hikiola Cooperative. Patrick K. Wong and Moana Lutey appeared by phone on behalf of Defendant County of Maui. At the Status Conference, counsel advised the Court that the parties have agreed to an extension of the effective date of the Maui County Ordinance, regarding genetically engineered crops, approved by ballot initiative on November 4, 2014 (“Ordinance”). Counsel are in the process of preparing a Stipulation and Case 1:14-cv-00511-BMK Document 23 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 424
  2. 2. 2 Proposed Order. The Stipulation and Proposed Order shall be submitted to the Court on or before December 1, 2014, and shall detail the terms of the injunction, including (1) the reasons why it is issued, (2) its terms specifically, and (3) shall describe in reasonable detail the act or acts restrained or required. See Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 65. In light of the parties’ agreement, and at the request of the parties, the Court hereby enters an injunction, prohibiting the enactment and enforcement of the Ordinance until such a time as the Court may review and consider the parties’ Stipulation and Proposed Order, but this injunction shall extend no later than December 5, 2014, unless further ordered by the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 14, 2014. Robert Ito Farm, Inc., et al. v. County of Maui, CIV. NO. 14-00511 BMK; ORDER. /S/ Barry M. Kurren Barry M. Kurren United States Magistrate Judge Case 1:14-cv-00511-BMK Document 23 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 425

×