💚Chandigarh Call Girls Service 💯Piya 📲🔝8868886958🔝Call Girls In Chandigarh No...
Regulatory Reform - Are we heading in the right direction?
1. Regulatory Reform:
Are we heading in the right direction?
Trisha Garrett, Assistant Secretary,
Complementary and OTC Medicines Branch
11 November 2015
3. Update
TGA Update
1. TGA restructure
2. Government agenda on “Innovation and Competitiveness, and
regulatory reform”
3. Improving Complementary Medicines processes within the existing
framework
4. Complementary and OTC medicines manufacturing
5. Labelling and Packaging review
4. 1. TGA restructure
Regulatory Services Group Structure
Deputy Secretary
TGA Office of Chemical Safety
Office of Gene
Technology Regulator
5. 1. TGA restructure
TGA Structure
TGA
Medicines Regulation
Division
Complementary and
OTC Medicines Branch
Pharmacovigilance and
Special Access Branch
Prescription Medicines
Authorisation Branch
Scientific Evaluation
Branch
Medical Devices and
Product Quality Division
Laboratories Branch
Manufacturing Quality
Branch
Medical Devices Branch
Regulatory Practice
and Support Division
Regulatory Engagement
and Planning Branch
Regulatory Services and
Improvement Branch
Regulatory Practice,
Education and Compliance
Branch
6. 1. TGA restructure
Medicines
Regulation
Division
PMAB
(Prescription Medicines
Authorisation Branch)
COMB
(Complementary and
OTC Medicines
Branch)
Management and
Operations
Complementary
Medicines
Evaluation
Listing Compliance Over-the-Counter
PSAB
(Pharmacovigilance
and Special Access
Branch)
SEB
(Scientific Evaluation
Branch)
7. 2. Government agenda on “Innovation and
Competitiveness, and regulatory reform”
Government commitment:
Broadly, there are two types of reforms:
• Improving processes within existing framework
• Policy change
8. 2. Government agenda on “Innovation and
Competitiveness, and regulatory reform”
Review of Medicines and Medical Devices
Regulation – Stage 1
• The first Report of the Review of Medicines and Medical Devices
Regulation was publicly released on 24 June 2015.
• 32 recommendations against a set of principles and frameworks and
suggests potential changes to legislation, processes and supporting
infrastructure necessary to improve the way medicines and medical
devices are regulated in Australia.
9. 2. Government agenda on “Innovation and
Competitiveness, and regulatory reform”
Review of Medicines and Medical Devices
Regulation
• The Department of Health is seeking input and feedback from
stakeholders across industry associations, consumer groups, and
clinical and professional groups.
• The purpose of the forums is to engage with stakeholders to
understand your views on the benefits and impacts of the
recommendations to help inform the Department of Health’s advice to
Government.
10. 2. Government agenda on “Innovation and
Competitiveness, and regulatory reform”
Review of Medicines and Medical Devices
Regulation
• Government response to recommendations are expected towards the
end of 2015.
• Publication of Part 2 relating to complementary medicines and
advertising will be announced by Government.
• More information: health.gov.au
– Expert-Review-of-Medicines-and-Medical-Devices-Regulation
11. 2. Government agenda on “Innovation and
Competitiveness, and regulatory reform”
New Regulator Performance Framework
• A new Regulator Performance Framework was released in November
2014, comprising six outcomes-based key performance indicators
(KPI’s)
• The Framework also comprises measures of good regulatory
performance to be used by all regulators to assess their achievement
of the KPIs
• Processes exist within the Framework for external validation of
regulators’ self-assessments, e.g. annual certification and targeted
external review every three years
12. 2. Government agenda on “Innovation and
Competitiveness, and regulatory reform”
Key performance indicators
1. Regulators do not unnecessarily impede the efficient operation of regulated
entities
2. Communication with regulated entities is clear, targeted and effective
3. Actions undertaken by regulators are proportionate to the regulatory risk being
managed
4. Compliance and monitoring approaches are streamlined and coordinated
5. Regulators are open and transparent in their dealings with regulated entities
6. Regulators actively contribute to the continuous improvement of regulatory
frameworks
13. 2. Government agenda on “Innovation and
Competitiveness, and regulatory reform”
Implementation of the new framework
• Consultation with TGA-Industry Consultative Committee
• Approval by the Minister for Health following agreed formal stakeholder
consultation
• Develop any necessary data capture processes
• The first assessment period is the 2015-16 financial year
• The first report will be delivered in August 2016
14. 3. Improving Complementary Medicines
processes within the existing framework
Improving processes within existing framework
• International work sharing
• Permissible ingredients for use in listed medicines - Implementation of
26BB of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989
• Complementary Medicines Business Process Reform
• Over-the-Counter Business Process Reform
15. 3. Improving Complementary Medicines
processes within the existing framework
International Work Sharing
The TGA continues to work with partner agencies on a range of activities:
Australia, Canada, Singapore and Switzerland to identify opportunities for
the evaluation of the safety of new substances; and
New Zealand and Canada on OTC medicines.
16. Ingredients
Section 26BB inserted into Act, 2009
• Single source of truth
• All ingredients (active and
excipient) and requirements
• Publicly accessible
• Simple
• Transparent
17. 3. Improving Complementary Medicines
processes within the existing framework
Ingredients list:
Therapeutic Goods Permissible Ingredients Determination 2015 (No 1)
The 26BB list includes all relevant requirements for ingredients for
listed medicines.
18. 3. Improving Complementary Medicines
processes within the existing framework
Changes to the Regulations
• 26BB Consequential changes
• Therapeutic Goods Regulations:
– Schedule 4 (Eligibility for listing)
– Schedule 9 (Fees)
– Regulation 3AA (RASML)
19. CM BPR – new portal and processes
• Business Process Reform
• Expert Review of Medicines and
Medical Devices
Partnership to achieve high quality
applications and more predictable timeframes
20. OTC BPR
• Improved target times for OTC
evaluations
• Updated guidance material
• Revised fees commencing
1 January 2016
21. 4. Complementary and OTC Medicines
Manufacturing
GMP Inspections: risk based framework
New risk framework:
• Product and manufacturing risk matrix will be adjusted to reflect TGA
experience (e.g. listed medicines will be Low Risk)
• Compliance history – reduced reinspection frequencies for
manufacturers with repeat A1 ratings
• Reinspection frequencies – different for registered vs listed medicines
(listed medicines up to 48 months for repeat A1 ratings)
22. 4. Complementary and OTC Medicines
Manufacturing
GMP Inspections: risk based framework
Complementary Medicines manufacturing quality guidelines
• TGA Industry Working Group on GMP to develop guidelines on how
TGA will apply PIC/S guidelines to take into account issues specific to
the Australian market and/or specific product types
• Currently working on Complementary Medicines and Sunscreen specific
matters
23. 5. Labelling and Packaging review
Medicines labelling review
Aims to address problems:
• Expression of active ingredients
• Allergies to excipients
• CMs and interactions with other medicines
24. 5. Labelling and Packaging review
Current status: Labelling review
• Finalised review of submissions received during the 2014 consultation
• Revised draft labelling Order and Guidance
• “What’s different” document
• Decision RIS
26. Conclusion: already on our way
• International harmonisation and information sharing
• Streamlining of business processes
• Review will inform future reforms
• Updated guidance
Editor's Notes
Recent TGA restructure – OTC now a part of Complementary Medicines Branch
It is envisioned that this will enable:
use of safety evaluations conducted by partners
sharing of evaluation workloads
resolution of technical problems by specialists in different agencies
expedited application processing times across all agencies.
Key messages
The creation of the permissible ingredients list under 26BB of the Act will not change the regulatory requirements or relevant fees for sponsors, and will not affect the regulatory status of any complementary medicines.
This work will increase transparency and reduce complexity by creating a single, consolidated, transparent and publicly available list of all ingredients and their associated requirements.
We are keen to engage with industry to ensure the list is correct, up to date and fit for purpose
The implementation of the 26BB list does not result in a ‘new approach’ to the evaluation process or eligibility for listing requirements.
It is also not a ‘new’ approach in terms of the legislative mechanism that allows for the creation of the 26BB legislative instrument.
A suite of changes to the Act, which included 26BB and related legislation, was originally consulted with industry representative bodies in 2006/2007.
The creation of the legislative instrument allows for a single, consolidated source of truth, with all relevant requirement being included in the list. It will be made publicly available on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments (FRLI) and be subject to Parliamentary scrutiny.
Key messages
The creation of the permissible ingredients list under 26BB of the Act will not change the regulatory requirements or relevant fees for sponsors, and will not affect the regulatory status of any complementary medicines.
This work will increase transparency and reduce complexity by creating a single, consolidated, transparent and publicly available list of all ingredients and their associated requirements.
We are keen to engage with industry to ensure the list is correct, up to date and fit for purpose
The implementation of the list will not have any impact on sponsors, other than to clearly capture ingredients that are available for use in listed medicines.
The List
The 26BB list is a comprehensive list that includes all active and excipient ingredients, including ingredients used in PIs.
Ingredients are listed individually using their internationally recognised name wherever practicable.
The list specifies:
How the ingredient is to be used in the medicine, e.g. active or excipient
Route of administration, for example as a topical or oral use
Concentration/volume limits
Container, packaging or labelling requirements, e.g. allergen advice.
The implementation of the list will not have any impact on sponsors, other than to clearly capture ingredients and their restrictions that are available for use in listed medicines.
I thought I would bring your attention to a few key points:
The list also captures requirements from all regulatory sources, including the Poisons Standard and RASML. This means that the list should provide a single comprehensive legislative source for all ingredients and their requirements. The list will be the legislative basis underpinning the Electronic Listing Facility.
Requirements have been written as simply as possible while ensuring readability, legislative integrity and as much freedom from ambiguity and contradiction as possible.
Proprietary ingredients have not been included in the list. Rather, the ingredients that would form part of those Proprietary ingredients, have been included. For example, the Parent PI such as ‘Flavour X’ is not included in the list as there is no legislative basis for using PIs. However, all the child ingredients that would go into Flavour X are captured in the list.
Next steps
Once the list is ready, it will be incorporated into a Legislative Instrument which we are able to create under subsection 26BB(1) of the Act. The Legislative Instrument is currently being developed in conjunction with the Office of Parliamentary Council.
The Legislative Instruments Act 2003 requires legislative instruments to be registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments (which is accessed via the ComLaw website) and tabled in Parliament.
An explanatory statement is also being prepared for the legislative instrument.
Legislative instruments are normally disallowable, which means that either House of Parliament may stop their operation by a vote within a set period after they have been tabled.
Key messages
The creation of the permissible ingredients list under 26BB of the Act will not change the regulatory requirements or relevant fees for sponsors, and will not affect the regulatory status of any complementary medicines.
This work will increase transparency and reduce complexity by creating a single, consolidated, transparent and publicly available list of all ingredients and their associated requirements.
We are keen to engage with industry to ensure the list is correct, up to date and fit for purpose
Evaluation process
Our internal evaluation process for ingredients will not change as a result of the implementation of the legislative instrument.
Applications will still be received and evaluated as they currently are.
We are expecting that the MMDR (Medicines and Medical Device Review) will result in recommendations relating to the evaluation of ingredients.
The CMBPR process will involve the creation of ingredient application categories that will have an associated timeframe.
These changes are likely to result in a more streamlined, improved evaluation process with a greater emphasis on the use of international evaluations. However, the 26BB legislative instrument will not have this sort of impact. Instead it captures all available ingredients which will be useful, regardless of any changes to the framework.
Making ingredients available for use
In terms of the process of making the ingredients available for use:
1. Applications will still be received via current arrangements.
2. Once an ingredient has been approved, the sponsor will be notified of this decision.
3. Before it becomes legally available for use, it must be added to the 26BB legislative instrument and made available on FRLI.
This differs from the current process where individual ingredients are made available through individual listing notices.
In creating a single legislative instrument and moving away from listing notices, consideration has been given to what this would look like for industry and any resulting cost-recovery implications. In considering the legislative process involved, the best approach would be to update the list four times a year.
The CMBPR process will ensure that timeframes and cut off dates for inclusion in the each update to the list will be made very clear and transparent to allow you to factor this into your business processes.
Aim: Was to address problems identified over last decade, including:
Inability to identify active ingredients and their amounts
Confusion about what actives are present in a range of products
Allergies to excipients
Important: complementary medicines and potential for drug interactions
Main changes impacting on Complementary medicines
Active ingredients proposed to be removed from the fronts of labels
More excipients that must be declared (e.g. crustacean, egg, fish, sesame, soya and tree nut products, potassium and sucralose)
Homeopathic medicines vs homeopathic ingredients
Clarification of quantities of herbal ingredient (extract and equivalent fresh/dry weight)