Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
RN Ref 2
1. RN Form S3300c (Original 8/98)
Naval Service Ratings and Other Ranks
Record 3 -Appraisal Report
1 Personal Details 18t03t2000 l=sjl r1/12t2000 A9
iliRatt iatii: li.tll ;i ll llliS:'S*l=il li$F?.lirm$ &JliEt*Iiii':i",::'*i=:::{:]! i
'iLiirlil
D238108B I I OM1C 1s10711997 HARDING S
02t07il978 I OEr 129t09/20t8 0y0311999 C Y Y
MCO COMPOP, Bridge Watchkeeper, DHP, RF, Internal Comms HMS INVINCIBLE
Y N NA Y NY N N
2a. Current performance.
OM HARDING continues to provide a sound service to the Department. He has been in
nharoe nf the rrnlreen nf fhe urirc qerielc and hac qsqisted in fhe mainfenance and nneratinn of
}j A
Prof Knowledge,
Skills & ExDerience
E D
the portable radio fit. HARDING is a very knowledgable and experienced OM1 and Effective Intell igence E D
rvSurorrJ oJJIJLJ YYlLll Luw uour[r6 vr urv rwJJ w^Purwuwwu wvxryvlvur
CLX operator and has displayed that he is a highly proficient Compop. Displaying consistent
Judgement E D
sounoJuqgemenL tllIujrl, ls a narurauy qurer man wno oan oe mlstaKen as uluovE-rr. lIrls
is far from the case. He is an effective operator, who is capable of directing his peers, giving
Management and use of
Resources
E D
clear and concise direction and was a conscientious Rating rn Charge of the Commumcatlons
Watch whilst on deployment for 5 weeks. However, because he appears quiet, this detracts
from his presence and leadership potential. Consistently well presented, HARDING is a very
effective member of the team who has the ootential to do well in the Service. He considered
Communication
D D
Courage and Physieal
Ability
D C
submitting his l8 month notice in July 00, but subsequently declined. He has expressed an
interest in applying for 148 Battery as a future draft, and has been made fully aware of the
rigourous training and fitness standard that is demanded. Although he has not yet considered
sitting the PPE for LOM, he would have little difficulty in achieving the required standard.
Signature WORSP J JACKSON
Leadership
E D
Subordinate
Development
E D
Personal Qualities E D
Effectiveness
C
RESTRICTED - STAF'F'
- HOD's / CO's Comments & Assessment.
4a. Potential tor 2OEl Further Service 5a. Long Term Potential.
4b. Potential for Future Training / Employment
4c. lnstructional Potential
:lffi+ffiir,rlr*l. 5b. Relative
Promotion Potential
6. Potential for promotion THIS BOARD.
e v;y au1;e
I
{a-d I
B ffins -_l
I :f 1: :f
tk-dl ::
c o&elorlne
I
fa;f) I
Signature Name Rank
7. Declaration. I have been given a copy of this report, confirmed my candidature status and participated in a formal Performance Assessment Discussion.
"l understand the nature and consequences of the warning given at Section 3. ( * delete when inapplicable)
Signature Date
RESTRICTED - STAFF