VIP Kolkata Call Girl Rajarhat 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
Exploring the strategies, odc managers need to improve knowledge management in a multigenerational construction organization
1.
2. Problem
Purpose and Significance
Research Question
Conceptual Framework
Research Method
Population for Study
Sample and Sampling Procedure
Instrumentation
Data Collection
Data Analysis
Demographics
Qualitative Findings
Limitations
Limitations for Practice
Limitations for the Study
Recommendations for Future Research
Conclusion
Closure
3. The problem that was addressed in the study is the strategies ODC managers need to improve
knowledge management in a multigenerational construction organization have not been established
(Cummings-White, 2013)
As the older generations retire, companies are losing knowledge capital
Forecasted over 25 million baby boomers would retire by the end of 2019 in the United States
(U.S. Department of Labor,2016).
25% of the 150.9 million jobs in the United States require replacing (U.S. Bureau of Labor, 2016).
Gap in Knowledge: A lack of understanding by the ODC managers on the characteristics of
knowledge management and the knowledge transfer methods and strategies
4. Purpose
The purpose of the qualitative exploratory study was to explore the strategies ODC managers
need to improve knowledge management in a multigenerational construction organization
(Cummings-White, 2013).
This research study sought to explore the experiences and perspectives of multigenerational
workforce managers through an exploratory lens.
Significance
The stakeholders for this study are construction organizations, ODC managers, and the
construction industries
This study looked at the impact that knowledge management has on an organizations ability to
continue to stay viable, competitive and create innovation (Meng & Brown, 2018).
Construction organizations, ODC managers, and the construction industry need to find a means
to change the way they capture and share knowledge to stay competitive and sustain their market
share.
5. What are the strategies ODC managers need to improve knowledge management in a
multigenerational construction organization?
6.
7. ▫ Research method
This study adopted a basic qualitative method, which was defined by Merriam and
Tisdell (2015).
▫ Research design
A basic qualitative design was used for this study because it looked to explore and
understand the social and psychological phenomena from the experiences of
multigenerational cohorts (Kruger & Welman, 2001).
8. The research population for this study was multigenerational ODC managers working
in significant construction firms in the United States, with field offices in the states of
Colorado (southern CO) and New Mexico (north central NM).
The managers were in their managerial roles for 2 years or more and were successfully
employed in these firms for 10 years or more.
The estimated size of the population was based on six construction organizations with a
general population of 150 employees each
9. Sample size for this study was 10 participants.
Sample size allowed for data saturation to be achieved .
Previous studies sample size was 14 to achieve saturation (Cummings –White,
2013); Elkington and Williams, 2013)
How did you sample?
A purposeful recruitment strategy was developed that focused explicitly on selecting
known study participants that met specific qualifications.
Participants: Selected through online professional LinkedIn network Each
participant was purposefully screened research based on time in their current
position (on-the-job for at least 12 months),
10. – Validity- Steps taken by the researcher to ensure accuracy of data collection
(Creswell & Creswell, 2017)
• Credibility- The authenticity and accuracy of the of the participant
responses.
• Dependability- The vetting of participants, asking questions to get in-depth
responses careful examination and documentation.
• Transferability- Sufficient contextual information regarding fieldwork sites
was provided so that transferability could be done into other research
inquiries (Lincoln & Guba, 1986).
• Confirmability- Transparency and a neutral stance through the audit trail
(Creswell, 2015a).
11. – Reliability-
• Triangulation- Different methods to investigate the same data (Leech &
Onwuegbuzie, 2007).
• Member checking- the accuracy, credibility, and validity of the data research
interviews (Creswell & Creswell, 2017).
• Pilot test- Determining if there were flaws, limitations, or other unforeseen
weaknesses within the interview design (Creswell & Creswell, 2017)
12. Face-to-face interviews were utilized whenever possible; additionally, telecommunications
were used when face-to-face interviews could not be scheduled due to participants’
schedules.
Interview protocol followed
Recorded interviews and hand written notes
Interviews professionally transcribed
13. First part of data analysis
• Grouping study participant responses by the questions (or topics)
• Data categorization and transcription
• Data transcribed by subcontractor(rev.com)
• Categorized and grouped
• Notes and transcribed data combined
• Summarized individual interviews
Second part of data analysis
• Elemental coding methods
• Comparative analysis using Dedoose
• Descriptive coding
• Priori codes, of “barriers,” and “enablers
14. Identification Department Title Yrs. of Experience Employee Gender
P1 EPC Manager 20 Private Contractor Male
P2 QA Manager 16 Private Contractor Female
P3 EPC Manager 30 Government Contractor Male
P4 EPC Project Mgr. 30 Private Contractor Male
P5 RC General Mgr. 15 Private Contractor Male
P6 HRM Manager 20 Private Contractor Female
P7 EPC Execution Mgr. 30 Government Contractor Male
P8 EPC Planning Mgr. 40 Government Contractor Male
P9 Contractor Owner Operator 20 Private Contractor Male
P10 Contractor Operations Manger 20 Private Contractor Male
15. Major Themes n =174
Communication
77
Cross collaboration
67
Willingness to learn or teach
52
Professional development
44
OJT
34
16. Communication was critical to all 10 study participants as they discussed how
communication, or the lack thereof can be a challenging process when it comes to
transcending generational stereotypes and biases.
Communication aided knowledge transfer “We talk about how we’d link up mentors and
mentees, for example, so they can share that experience or how do we put them in a
position where they're driving change, transferring their knowledge to the next generation
workforce.”
In agreement and alignment existing literature Houck (2011), and Paulin and Suneson
(2015).
This theme is significant to ODC managers is that they should create open lines of
communication between their teams
17. Cross Collaboration efforts were limited and not useful because it was not happening
within the participants' organizations and a specific project
Cross collaboration aids knowledge management “In the business manager world, you
had to be sort of the mediator between the actual employees and the employer to make
sure that there was a harmonious balance between what management needed and what
the craft needed.”
In agreement and alignment existing literature Cummings-White (2013), Brown et al.
(2013), and Gursoy et al. (2013.
This theme is significant to ODC managers, construction organizations and
employees is that it would in building relationships and building personal and
professional networks
18. Willingness to Teach was not always shared by workers in the construction organization.
“There exists an issue with knowledge management and particularly knowledge transfer is
the ability and availability of those who have the knowledge to be willing to teach.”
In agreement and alignment existing literature Martin & Salomon (2002), and Brown et
al., (2013).
This theme is significant to ODC managers, construction organizations, and
employees. There exists an issue with knowledge management and particularly
knowledge transfer because there a lack of the ability and availability of those who
have the knowledge to be willing to teach
19. Professional Development in construction organizations, unless the professional
development was seen as value added and the ability to bring back knowledge to share with
the project, it was often not made available.
Professional development “People nearing the end of their career, we look at them too and
talk about how we take that knowledge and transfer it to the upcoming people.”
In agreement and alignment existing literature Carrillo & Chinowsky (2006), and Jahren &
Johnston, (2011).
This theme is significant to ODC managers because it signifies to ODC managers that
there are limitations to in house professional development initiatives
20. On the Job Training (OJT)- was seen as the best way to transfer tacit and explicit
knowledge, only because it teaches the learner by utilizing hands-on learning.
OJT aids knowledge management “I was trained by two individuals that they gave me the
training and knowledge that they had and I, in turn, I turned around and trained people
coming up behind me.”
In agreement and alignment existing literature Meng and Brown (2018) and Raidén and
Dainty (2006).
This theme is significant to ODC managers, construction organizations, and
employees. ODC managers who have been proactive to utilize hands-on learning
initiatives have seen their corporate culture improve, to the point where employees are
now part of the knowledge transfer process, and collaboration and creativity abound
21. Qualitative studies in general are dependent on participant
Honesty, mindset, management skills, and articulation skills
Varied backgrounds of participants
The experiences of each study participant, was unknown
Sample size and narrow participant demographic
Small Sample Size
Scale of the study results
22. • Implication and Recommendation for Practice 1
▫ ODC Mangers need to recognize the type of knowledge that need to be addressed.
▫ Create a living process that facilitates consistency and awareness that the requirement for
knowledge transfer is a condition of employment.
23. • Implication and Recommendation for Practice 2
▫ Construction leaders who take time to build relationships with their workers and are
visible to everyone have greater success in helping ODC initiatives succeed.
▫ ODC managers should try to create an incentive for all generations to transfer knowledge
and for generations to report roadblock in transferring knowledge.
24. • Implication and Recommendation for Practice 3
▫ ODC managers might consider being open-minded, and approachable to build trust among
your employees.
▫ To avoid organizational change overload, consider evaluating construction organizations
change initiatives that are approved by executive leaders, to ensure they are value added
25. Construction Organizations
Explore the knowledge management needs of the construction organization to allow
them to achieve a profound and sustainable means of knowledge transference amongst
a multigenerational workforce using the five major themes
The kind of knowledge management strategies used by ODC manager working in
construction organizations
The lack of management to engage in promotion of knowledge transfer was not seen as
a priority or not considered at all
26. Recommendation for Future Research 1
Future researchers should inquire directly to the ODC manager’s direct reports to see if
their leadership style is working to elicit knowledge transfer interactions.
Recommendation for Future Research 2
Future research should look at the use of new technology platforms that would allow
ODC manger and their workforce to create and capture knowledge for future use across
an array of topics.
27. Recommendation for Future Research 3
Further research should be done to identify why there is a lack of funding for knowledge
management in construction organizations.
Recommendation for Future Research 4
Further research into construction organizations to establish and understand the importance of
knowledge transfer as being a significant part of the knowledge management process is warranted.
28. Knowledge Transfer
Create departmental succession planning (engineering design, trades, project controls,
estimating, planning, and work control).
Institute an interdepartmental mentoring, cross-training, formal internal and external
training, and develop knowledge communities.
Create group think activities that require interdepartmental and multigenerational
interactions to resolve issues.
Institute a knowledge transfer video library
Create initiatives for older knowledge transfer opportunities
29. Communication
Create a streamlined process of communication that encompasses everyone
Initiate transparent communication
Institute all hands monthly meetings
Come up with cost saving initiatives that are recognized and rewarded
30. Cross Collaboration
Emphasize the requirement for cross-collaboration amongst peers and outside
department experts
Make cross collaboration a naturally occurring
Appoint departmental cross collaboration leads
Initiate a cross-collaboration between tradesmen and tradeswomen and design
engineers
31. On the Job Training
Perform a cross-reference of employee’s experiences and promote in-house on the job
training Make cross collaboration a naturally occurring
Challenge employees to provide weekly knowledge shares
make it a point to pair up those employees that want to learn via on the job training and
provide an incentive
32. Study participants data successfully answered the research questions and saturation was
achieved.
Five strategies emerged: Communication, Cross Collaborations, Willingness to Teach,
Professional Development, and On the Job Training
Participant responses discussed barriers
Lack of funding, lack of management engagement, and lack of Vision
Participant responses discussed Opportunities to excel
Management buy in, succession planning, leading by example
The study utilized a conceptual framework. The conceptual framework intended to illustrate the relationships that exist between multigenerational workers in construction organizations, knowledge sharing opportunities, and ODC managers.
Qualitative study works well with the size of the sample size and the limited time frame required for the study.
This approach was appropriate for this study because we are dealing with the known phenomenon of multigenerational interactions and it was essential to analyze the lived experiences of these multigenerational workers to understand what organizations can do to foster knowledge transfer and grow their knowledge capital (Leedy & Ormrod, 2005; Shore, 2006).
The population in this research study referred to the well-defined collection of individuals or objects that are known to have similar characteristics (Creswell, 2015a). The research population for this study was multigenerational ODC managers working in significant construction firms in the United States, with field offices in the states of Colorado (southern CO) and New Mexico (central NM). The managers would need to be in their managerial roles for 2 years or more and would have successfully been employed in these firms for 10 years or more. The estimated size of the population will be based on six construction organizations with a general population of 150 employees in each of the six construction organizations located in southern Colorado and north-central New Mexico.
The number of participants in the qualitative research depended on differences within the people, phenomenon, or setting, which was large enough to achieve saturation (Rohde & Ross-Gordon, 2012). To focus the scope of the research, the sample for this study was purposefully selected by the researcher to represent construction professionals whose expertise stretched across all disciplines of the construction industry. A sample is merely a subset of the population, and the sample size must be representative of the population from which it is drawn (Creswell, 2015a).
The sample size arises from being able to include or test all the individuals in a certain demographic (Creswell, 2017). The sample size of 10 ODC manager participants was used; however, the interviews would have continued until saturation was achieved. A sample size of 10 participants provided enough opportunities to sample multigenerational workforce managers working in different roles and responsibilities within these construction firms. The sample size was appropriate because Cummings -White (2013) utilized a sample size of 14 and was able to reach saturation. Elkington and Williams (2013) also used a sample size of 14 to reach saturation in a study on engineering procurement construction companies. Each participant was purposefully screened research based on time in their current position (on-the-job for at least 12 months),
How many participants did you have? – and justify this number
The 10 participants represent the construction organizations which engaged in Engineering Procurement Construction (EPC); Human Resource Management (HRM); Railroad Contractor (RC), Quality Assurance Management (QA).
How did you sample?
The number of participants in the qualitative research depended on differences within the people, phenomenon, or setting, which was large enough to achieve saturation (Rohde & Ross-Gordon, 2012). To focus the scope of the research, the sample for this study was purposefully selected by the researcher to represent construction professionals whose expertise stretched across all disciplines of the construction industry.
The number of participants in the qualitative research depended on differences within the people, phenomenon, or setting, which was large enough to achieve saturation (Rohde & Ross-Gordon, 2012). To focus the scope of the research, the sample for this study was purposefully selected by the researcher to represent construction professionals whose expertise stretched across all disciplines of the construction industry. A sample is merely a subset of the population, and the sample size must be representative of the population from which it is drawn (Creswell, 2015a). The sample size arises from being able to include or test all the individuals in a certain demographic (Creswell, 2017). The sample size of 10 ODC manager participants was used; however, the interviews would have continued until saturation was achieved. A sample size of 10 participants provided enough opportunities to sample multigenerational workforce managers working in different roles and responsibilities within these construction firms. The sample size was appropriate because Cummings -White (2013) utilized a sample size of 14 and was able to reach saturation. Elkington and Williams (2013) also used a sample size of 14 to reach saturation in a study on engineering procurement construction companies.
What was the sampling method?
A purposeful recruitment strategy was developed that focused explicitly on selecting known study participants that met specific qualifications; a process was designed to identify potential study participants, based on referral, for the research study (Yin, 2011). Each participant was purposefully screened research based on time in their current position (on-the-job for at least 12 months), and limited participation to construction workers serving in a position that was directly responsible for or contributed to the transference of knowledge within their chosen field of expertise.
How did you obtain the participants
After obtaining IRB approval, potential participants were contacted via emails or phone numbers obtained from social media, requesting their participation. The process to identify participants was to use social networks (LinkedIn, Yammer) to reach out to known individuals who were characterized as ODC managers who had been working in the construction industry for the last 10 years or who belong to any of the following professional organizations: Associated Builders and Contractors, Construction Management Association of America, American Institute of Constructors, Associated General Contractors of America, Design-Build Institute of America, and have agreed to participate in the research study.
For the sampling method used a purposeful recruitment strategy that focused explicitly on selecting known study participants that met specific qualifications
Based on referral, for the research study (Yin, 2011)
Each participant was purposefully screened
Based on time in their current position (on-the-job for at least 12 months)
Limited participation to construction ODC manager serving in a position that was
Directly responsible for or contributed to the transference of knowledge within their chosen field of expertise.
How did you obtain the participants
The process to identify participants was to use social networks (LinkedIn, Yammer)
Reached out to known individuals who were characterized as ODC managers
Working in the construction industry for the last 10 years
Or who belong to any of the following professional organizations: Associated Builders and Contractors, Construction Management Association of America, American Institute of Constructors, Associated General Contractors of America, Design-Build Institute of America, and have agreed to participate in the research study.
Via emails or phone numbers obtained from social media, requesting their participation.
Discuss the instrument(s) you used, and how you addressed validity and reliability : Yin (2011), explained that researchers play a central role in qualitative research by acting as the primary instrument to collect, analyze, and interpret research data. For this study the researcher was the instrument..
Qual
Validity- To ensure the validity of the data collected and protocol implemented in this study the following steps will be used: sampling was purposeful, but participants were selected only if they meet the proper criteria.
Credibility- because the participants were describing their experiences with multigenerational knowledge transfer interactions in construction organizations, only they could judge the credibility of the result. The credibility of the qualitative study was determined by both the researcher and participant, through accurate results from participant viewpoints (Creswell & Creswell, 2017)
Dependability- To achieve dependability, the need for multigenerational knowledge transfer interactions was described, and how the lack of these interactions affected construction organizations.
Transferability- the works of the researcher should ensure that sufficient contextual information regarding fieldwork sites was provided so that transferability could be done into other research inquiries (Lincoln & Guba, 1986).
Confirmability- Conformability was vital to qualitative research because it required the researcher to eliminate biases and favors from the qualitative findings that were obtained.
Reliability- Reliability applies to being able to ensure that the measuring instrument provides the same results reliably (Creswell, 2015b).
Triangulation- Using triangulation contributed to the qualitative inquiry by using different methods to investigate the same data, although the expectation that the findings generated using various techniques would not produce an integrated process, triangulation was used to understand and study why, and when there were differences in the data (Leech & Onwuegbuzie, 2007).
Member checking- where a researcher looks to improve the accuracy, credibility, and validity of the data research interviews
Pilot test- assist the research by determining if there were flaws, limitations, or other unforeseen weaknesses within the interview design.
Discuss the instrument(s) you used, and how you addressed validity and reliability : Yin (2011), explained that researchers play a central role in qualitative research by acting as the primary instrument to collect, analyze, and interpret research data. For this study the researcher was the instrument..
Qual
Validity- To ensure the validity of the data collected and protocol implemented in this study the following steps will be used: sampling was purposeful, but participants were selected only if they meet the proper criteria.
Credibility- because the participants were describing their experiences with multigenerational knowledge transfer interactions in construction organizations, only they could judge the credibility of the result. The credibility of the qualitative study was determined by both the researcher and participant, through accurate results from participant viewpoints (Creswell & Creswell, 2017)
Dependability- To achieve dependability, the need for multigenerational knowledge transfer interactions was described, and how the lack of these interactions affected construction organizations.
Transferability- the works of the researcher should ensure that sufficient contextual information regarding fieldwork sites was provided so that transferability could be done into other research inquiries (Lincoln & Guba, 1986).
Confirmability- Conformability was vital to qualitative research because it required the researcher to eliminate biases and favors from the qualitative findings that were obtained.
Reliability- Reliability applies to being able to ensure that the measuring instrument provides the same results reliably (Creswell, 2015b).
Triangulation- Using triangulation contributed to the qualitative inquiry by using different methods to investigate the same data, although the expectation that the findings generated using various techniques would not produce an integrated process, triangulation was used to understand and study why, and when there were differences in the data (Leech & Onwuegbuzie, 2007).
Member checking- where a researcher looks to improve the accuracy, credibility, and validity of the data research interviews
Pilot test- assist the research by determining if there were flaws, limitations, or other unforeseen weaknesses within the interview design.
Data collection was conducted in multiple steps. As part of this study, data collection started with the review of existing academic and practitioner literature related explicitly to: What are the strategies managers need to improve knowledge management in a multigenerational construction organization. The literature led to a better understanding of the various seminal and current studies and theories that describe, explain, or improve knowledge management in multigenerational organizations (Creswell, 2015a). This review also exposed the researcher to original and recent concepts and theories related to the impact of improving knowledge management on individuals, groups, organizations, societies, cultures, and nations (Merriam & Tisdell, 2015).