Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.



Published on

Published in: Career
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this


  1. 1. Chapter 4 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Section 4.06 Community Mental Health Follow-up on VFM Section 3.06, 2008 Annual Report In our 2008 Annual Report, we identified the fol- Background lowing key issues: • The Ministry was not yet close to achieving its target of spending 60% of mental-healthThe Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (Min- funding on community-based services. In theistry) provides transfer payments to 14 Local Health 2006/07 fiscal year, the Ministry spent aboutIntegration Networks (LHINs) that, in turn, in the $39 on community-based services for every2009/2010 fiscal year funded and oversaw about $61 it spent on institutional services.325 (330 in 2007/08) community-based providersof mental-health services. In the 2009/10 fiscal • Notwithstanding the significant investments in community care that had been made,year, funding to community mental-health services the LHINs and service providers we visitedand programs in Ontario was about $683 million acknowledged that many people with serious($647 million in 2007/08). mental illness in the community were still At the time of our 2008 audit, studies showed not receiving an appropriate level of care. Chapter 4 • Follow-up Section 4.06that one in five Ontarians would experience a Of those people in hospitals, many could bemental illness in some form and to some degree in discharged into the community if the neces-their lifetime; about 2.5% of the province’s popula- sary community mental-health services weretion aged 16 years and over would be categorized having been seriously mentally ill for some time.Mental-health policy in Ontario has been moving • There were lengthy wait times for community mental-health services, ranging from a min-from institutional care in psychiatric hospitals to imum of eight weeks to a year or more, andcommunity-based care in the most appropriate, about 180 days on average.most effective, and least restrictive setting. Ouraudit found that, while progress had been made in • Formal co-ordination and collaboration among stakeholders, including communityreducing the number of mentally ill people in insti- mental-health service providers, relevanttutions, the Ministry, working with the LHINs and ministries, and LHINs, was often lacking.its community-based partners, still had significantwork to do to enable people with serious mental ill- • The Ministry transferred responsibility for delivery of community mental-health servicesness to live fulfilling lives in their local community. to the LHINs on April 1, 2007, but the LHINs 329
  2. 2. 330 2010 Annual Report of the Office of the Auditor General of Ontario still faced challenges in assuming responsibil- ing most of our recommendations. Several will take ity for effectively overseeing and co-ordinating a few years to implement given that a long-term community-based services. strategy has not yet been completed and the infor- • Community mental-health service providers mation needed to ensure equitable funding and indicated that they were significantly chal- track success in meeting objectives and perform- lenged in their ability to maintain service ance commitments was not yet being collected from levels and qualified staff, given an average community agencies. The status of the action taken annual base-funding increase of 1.5% over on each recommendation at the time of our follow- the few years prior to our 2007/08 fiscal year up was as follows. audit. • Funding of community mental-health services Mental-HealtH StRategy was based on past funding levels rather than on actual needs. Historical-based funding Recommendation 1 resulted in significant differences in regional To better ensure that Ontario’s strategy of serving average per capita funding, ranging from a people with serious mental illness in the community high of $115 to a low of $19. rather than in an institutional setting is implemented • There was a critical shortage of supportive effectively, the Local Health Integration Networks housing units in some regions, with wait times (LHINs), in consultation with the Ministry of Health ranging from one to six years. Housing units and Long-Term Care, should provide the community were unevenly distributed, ranging from 20 capacity and resources needed to serve people with units per 100,000 people in one LHIN to 273 serious mental illness being discharged from institu- units per 100,000 people in another. While tional settings. some regions had shortages, others had sig- Status nificant vacancy rates, which were as high as In October 2008, the Ministry established an Advis- 26% in the Greater Toronto Area. ory Group on Mental Health and Addictions to • The Ministry and LHINs did not have suf- provide advice on: ficient information to be able to assess the adequacy of community-based care that • a new 10-year strategy for mental health and addictions focusing on people with seriousChapter 4 • Follow-up Section 4.06 people with serious mental illness were mental illness, complex problematic substance actually receiving. use, and problem-gambling issues as well as We made a number of recommendations for on people with less serious problems; and improvement and received commitments from the Ministry that it would take action to address • provincial priorities, actions, and expected results. our concerns. On February 18, 2009, the Standing The Ministry released a strategy progress report Committee on Public Accounts held a hearing on in March 2009 as well as a strategy discussion these recommendations and the Ministry’s plans to paper in July 2009. Other affected ministries (such address them. as Community and Social Services; Children and Youth Services; Education, Training, Colleges and Universities; and Municipal Affairs and Housing) Status of Recommendations and external organizations are also helping to iden- tify priorities for the strategy. The Ministry expects its 10-year Mental Health and Addictions Strategy According to information provided to us by the to be released in December 2010. Ministry, some progress has been made in address-
  3. 3. Community Mental Health 331 The Ministry also informed us that LHINs are (OCAN), which is based on the Camberwell Assess-exploring the expanded use of the new multi- ment of Need being used in other jurisdictions tosectoral service accountability agreements with track client data and assess the health and socialcommunity mental-health organizations to further needs of people with mental illness. The OCAN toolrefine performance measures to ensure that resour- enables knowledge transfer by allowing serviceces are appropriately deployed based on needs. providers to share standardized client assessmentThese agreements came into effect on April 1, 2009. information, thus reducing repetitive information- gathering and improving the flow of data through the system. aCCeSS to SeRviCeS At the time of our initial audit, the tool was Recommendation 2 being piloted in 16 community mental-healthTo help ensure that people with serious mental ill- organizations across the province. The Ministryness have consistent, equitable, and timely access to advised us that the pilot was successfully com-community-based services that are appropriate to pleted. These 16 organizations continued to use thetheir level of need, the Ministry of Health and Long- tool and shared their expertise with others begin-Term Care should: ning to use the tool. • improve provincial co-ordination with the Local The Ministry targets March 31, 2012, for OCAN Health Integration Networks (LHINs) and other to be fully implemented across more than 300 ministries that are involved in serving people community mental-health organizations. Once with mental illness; and implemented across the sector, the tool is expected • provide support to the LHINs—particularly in to produce high-quality data that support both terms of knowledge transfer and data avail- the provision of mental-health care to clients and ability—that would enable them to effectively informed decision-making at the organization, co-ordinate and oversee service providers as LHIN, and Ministry levels. intended. The Ministry reiterated that it is the responsibil- The Local Health Integration Networks should: ity of the LHINs to co-ordinate and integrate local • work with service providers to improve the reli- health services to serve client needs. The Ministry ability of wait-list and wait-time information; is working with them on community mental-health Chapter 4 • Follow-up Section 4.06 • collect and analyze wait-lists and wait times program issues such as improving wait times and and use such information in determining the availability of services. need for and prioritizing specific types and levels Meanwhile, the Ministry also informed us that of service; and LHINs have been identifying their populations • provide the necessary assistance to enhance in need and are working with local providers to co-ordination and collaboration among health- develop approaches to ensure that people with ser- service providers. ious mental illness receive appropriate services. StatusThe two-year multi-sectoral service accountability Fundingagreements between the LHINs and the community Recommendation 3organizations implemented during the 2009/10 To ensure that people with similar needs are able tofiscal year include financial and statistical reporting receive a similar level of community supports and ser-requirements. vices, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and In our 2008 Annual Report, we identified a new the Local Health Integration Networks should collecttool, the Ontario Common Assessment of Need complete data and adequate cost estimates to review
  4. 4. 332 2010 Annual Report of the Office of the Auditor General of Ontario regional variations in population characteristics, of housing units needed; the areas with serious needs, and health risks so that funding provided is shortages of housing; the levels of unmet needs, commensurate with the demand for and value of the occupancy, and vacancy; and the adequacy and services to be provided. appropriateness of care provided to housing clients; and Status The Ministry informed us that it is still in the • ensure one-time capital funding is being spent in a timely and prudent manner. process of compiling financial and program per- formance data that could be used to facilitate an Status evidence-based allocation methodology for the The Ministry advised us that it is continuing to community mental-health sector. In spring 2009, it improve data collection in regard to housing needs. received a four-year evaluation report on the impact It further indicated that it will over the next few of new funding. The Ministry has been working years refine, as required, and make more effective closely with the LHINs and service providers to the existing housing allocation methodology based develop a framework for new funding investments on the current portfolio and population. The Min- in the community mental-health sector. Ultimately, istry further indicated that it is currently working the Ministry expects to: with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing • provide evidence-based allocation of funding on a two-year, $16-million capital grant program for community mental health; and for the repair and regeneration of eligible social • develop strategies to address funding inequi- housing projects. ties across different regions so that clients The Ministry also informed us that it has initi- with similar mental-health issues receive ated accountability agreements and reporting appropriate levels of treatment services wher- mechanisms to monitor the implementation of one- ever they live in Ontario. time capital grants and ensure prudent and timely However, at the time of our follow-up, the spending. Ministry advised us that new funding methodolo- gies for the mental-health sector had not been PRogRaM StandaRdS developed because it lacked consistent data from this sector. The Ministry further indicated that it Recommendation 5Chapter 4 • Follow-up Section 4.06 has conveyed to addiction and mental-health agen- To ensure that service providers are delivering cies the need for the collection of consistent and comprehensive, consistent, and high-quality services complete clinical diagnostic and financial data sets in a cost-effective manner across the province, the in order to develop a reliable funding methodology. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and the Local Health Integration Networks should: HouSing • improve data-collection mechanisms and reporting requirements to obtain relevant, Recommendation 4 accurate, and consistent information across the To ensure that adequate supportive housing is avail- province for performance-monitoring purposes; able to provide people with serious mental illness and with appropriate, equitable, and consistent care, the • establish provincial standards, performance Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and the Local benchmarks, and outcome measures for at least Health Integration Networks should: the more critical programs against which the • improve data-collection mechanisms and system quality and costs of services can be evaluated. monitoring to determine the number and type
  5. 5. Community Mental Health 333 Status • report periodically to the public on the perform-The Ministry advised us that it is working to ance indicators for the community mental-improve data collection from mental-health agen- health sector.cies and has formed an advisory committee that Statusreviews all account codes and their definitions for The Ministry informed us that a steering committeeappropriateness and applicability to the sector. The consisting of ministry and LHIN representatives ismulti-sectoral service accountability agreements developing performance indicators, including thosebetween LHINs and community mental-health related to mental health. These indicators are toorganizations require the organizations to meet become part of the next accountability agreementestablished financial and statistical reporting cri- now under development between the LHINs andteria. The Ministry also informed us that ongoing the mental-health service quality feedback and education was being At the end of the 2009/10 fiscal year, theoffered to this sector. Ministry told us that 91% of all community mental- The Ministry further advised us that early psych- health and addiction organizations met reportingosis intervention standards have been developed requirements for financial and statistical data.but not yet released. All agencies funded to provide According to the Ministry, new financial and humanearly psychosis intervention programs will be resources/payroll systems have been implementedexpected to adhere to these new standards. for some organizations to simplify the processes for The Ministry informed us that it also has setting up and maintaining account informationconducted a review of short-term crisis beds that and for tracking data, and to streamline the processis to help develop standards to address this need. for submitting data to the Ministry.These standards are expected to be finalized by The first two-year, multi-sectoral serviceMarch 2012. accountability agreements include provisions for regular review of health-service providers, provi- PeRFoRManCe MeaSuReMent and sions to meet reporting requirements, and penalties RePoRting in the case of non-compliance. The Ministry indicated that it would consider Recommendation 6 the public reporting of performance indicators for Chapter 4 • Follow-up Section 4.06To better enable it to assess whether the service the community mental-health sector.providers are delivering services in a consistent, equit-able, and cost-effective manner, the Ministry of Healthand Long-Term Care should: MonitoRing and aCCountaBility • complete implementation of its comprehensive Recommendation 7 set of performance indicators and select targets To ensure that all partners in the community or benchmarks that will enable the Ministry and mental-health sector—the Ministry, the Local Health Local Health Integration Networks to properly Integration Networks (LHINs), and the service provid- assess the performance of service providers; ers—are accountable to Ontarians for the effective- • improve information systems to enable them to ness and quality of services, the Ministry should: collect complete, accurate, and useful data on which to base management decisions and to help • develop compliance mechanisms to monitor the LHINs’ accomplishment of their stated priorities determine if services provided are effective and and provide feedback to the LHINs for improve- represent value for money spent; and ment of their operations; and
  6. 6. 334 2010 Annual Report of the Office of the Auditor General of Ontario • review settlement packages on a timely basis to ment packages up to and including those from the ensure that funding is being spent in accordance 2006/07 fiscal year. This substantially meets its with ministry guidelines and that significant commitment made at the time of our initial audit to funding surpluses are being recovered from clear this old backlog by March 31, 2009. service providers. As well, the Ministry had completed 85% of the The Local Health Integration Networks should: 2007/08 fiscal year settlements and the remain- • develop guidelines together with the Ministry ing 15% was under review. All settlements with on monitoring service providers that include material balances were expected to be completed requirements to monitor significant third-party by August 31, 2010. contracts and to ensure that community mental- In addition to working toward the elimination of health funding is being well spent. the settlement backlog, the Ministry also informed us at the time of our follow-up that it had com- Status pleted 30% of the 2008/09 fiscal year settlements. According to the Ministry, LHINs are required to In February 2009, the Ministry and the LHINs provide it with an annual progress update on their developed draft audit and review guidelines for identified priorities. The Ministry informed us that hospitals that provide mental-health services. its staff review and analyze this information and According to the Ministry, similar audit and review provide the LHINs with an opportunity to explain guidelines are currently under development for any variances and revise their targets and imple- community agencies. mentation as necessary. The Ministry informed us that as of May 31, 2010, it had reviewed 98% of the backlog of settle-Chapter 4 • Follow-up Section 4.06