Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
2013 think tank presentation on socio technical system design 03 compressed
1. Thoughts on Design of Complex Socio-Technical Systems
Think Tank on Citizen Engagement in Biomedical Research
Washington D.C., May 2013
Olga Werby, Ed.D.
Pipsqueak Productions, LLC
2. “This is not an
information age,
itʼs an age of
networked
intelligence, an age
of vast promise.”
—Don Tapscott,
Author and Professor, TedGlobal 2012
4. Swahili for testimony
“Ushahidi uses a combination of citizen
journalism, social activism, and geospatial
information towards increasing accountability.”
Geo-Temporal Crowd-Sourced Data Platform
6. Lowell High School Project
San Francisco
World-Wide Food
Anthropology Project
Very successful:
• for a small group of student data
collectors
• and for a large group of first-time
Ushahidi users, learning to use the system
Less successful:
• as a data collection site
10. Needed components for success:
• team
• training
• trust
• time
• tenacity — Heather Leson, Ushahidi Director of Community Engagement
Geo-Temporal Crowd-Sourced Data Platform
16. Oversight Archived: 0
Prevention Archived: 0
Darfur Archived: 0Gaza (archived) 11,600
Gaza
72,000
Oversight
34,000
Darfur
62,000
Prevention
66,000
Reparations
47,000
Mass Rape
50,000
Libya 6,000
Lecture Series 19,000
+ 11.5 hours of video
Gaza
September 2010
Darfur
January 2011
Oversight
May 2011
Prevention
October 2011
Libya Mini-Issue
November 2011
Reparations
February 2012
Mass Rape
July 2012
Lecture Series
January 2013
LAUNCH
FUTURE5 months 3 months 5 months 4 months 5 months 8 months
(area and numbers reflect total number of words)
Human Rights & International Criminal Law
Innovating Justice Award 2012 2013 Computerworld Honors Laureate
Very successful:
• for a narrow audience
• & a narrowly-defined purpose
ICC
Forum.COM
18. Unsuccessful:
too hard to keep all the
information up to date
even when doing so
results in better
medical outcomes...
(information hoarding and data silos
were big problems)
Medical Memory Project
20. "Social bonds and a feeling of
membership augment the meaning
that comes from values-based work."ROSABETH MOSS KANTER
MOTIVATION:
• mastery
• membership
• meaning
• money
Motivational Lessons Learned
21. Make Information Relevant to All Users:
• COMPREHENSION: Information is understood by the people providing it
• GOALS:The reason for collection of data is understood
• PRIDE: People take pride in participating
• INCLUSIVENESS: People feel they are part of the group effort
•VISION: People know what will happen next
Make Information Easy to Provide:
•TARGETED: Use only the level of security that is necessary to
maintain the desired quality of data
• STANDARDIZED: Use standardized input structures
• STRUCTURED: Multiple choice is easier than fill-in the blanks
• SUPPORTED: Create in-line help
•VERIFIED: Provide confirmation that the data has been entered correctly
• RESPECTFUL: Respect the user!
Motivational Lessons Learned
23. Amount of Dedication
Available Time
Level of Expertise
Expertise
Required Expertise
Dedication
Required Dedication
Time
Required Time
Any group project can be
analyzed by how much it
asks of its participants:
• the time it requires,
• the level of expertise,
• and the amount of
dedication.
On Individual Participant Level
24. Successful Group Projects
Expertise
Required Expertise
Dedication
Required Dedication
Time
Required Time
Required Time = User Availability
Required Expertise = User’s Level of Expertise
Required Dedication = User’s Interest & Dedication
On Individual Participant Level
27. Expertise
Required Expertise
Dedication
Required Dedication
Time
Required Time
Expertise
Required Expertise
Dedication
Required Dedication
Time
Required Time
Expertise
Required Expertise
Dedication
Required Dedication
Time
Required Time
Expertise
Required Expertise
Dedication
Required Dedication
Time
Required Time
Expertise
Required Expertise
Dedication
Required Dedication
Time
Required Time
Participants give
up to the group:
• control
• personal information
• time
On Group Level
28. What Does the Socio-Technical System
Give to its Participants/Users?
29. Expertise
Required Expertise
Dedication
Required Dedication
Time
Required Time
Expertise
Required Expertise
Dedication
Required Dedication
Time
Required Time
Expertise
Required Expertise
Dedication
Required Dedication
Time
Required Time
Expertise
Required Expertise
Dedication
Required Dedication
Time
Required Time
Expertise
Required Expertise
Dedication
Required Dedication
Time
Required Time
Group gives
its participants:
• social connections
• group support & recognition
• a sense of belonging
• trust
• meaning & purpose
• a sense of accomplishment
On Group Level
30. Very successful:
• for a short burst of time &
• a narrowly-defined purpose
CrowdMaps for Elections
31. In 2010, Ushahidi has come full circle since the 2007
elections with its Uchaguzi (Swahili for elections)
initiative to monitor elections.
iHub Research
32. Think Tank on Citizen Engagement in Biomedical Research
Washington D.C., May 2013
Olga Werby, Ed.D.
Pipsqueak Productions, LLC
Design for Motivation
Solve Both Parts of the Equation,
the Tech AND the Social,
of Complex Socio-Technical Systems