The Emergency Department (ED) is often at the center of some of the most controversial issues in health care reform. The cost of care, coordination of care, avoidable hospitalizations, misuse of the ED, and other issues have challenged hospitals to keep costs under control while delivering timely access, efficiency, and quality.
Today's challenges certainly create an imperative for change. But more importantly, hospitals must respond to a rapidly evolving health care environment, where the typical approach may not only become obsolete, it may be perilous.
Preparing for the future will require substantial changes. An accurate “diagnosis and treatment plan” is essential. And getting this “right” matters.
2. Randy Pilgrim, MD, FACEP
Enterprise Chief Medical Officer
Jesse M. Pines, MD, MBA, MSCE
Director of the Office for Clinical Practice Innovation
Professor of Emergency Medicine and Health Policy
Brent R. Asplin, MD, MPH
Chief Clinical Officer
2
PRESENTERS
3. RIGHT – SIZING
THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
IN HEALTH CARE REFORM
3
4. EMERGENCY MEDICINE IN HEALTH REFORM
Emergency Departments must continue to deliver excellent
care for acute illness and injury.
Traditional functions must be refined and enhanced.
Changing the traditional approach to intermediate and
complex conditions results in significant near-term value.
The Emergency Department will redefine key functions:
▪ Patient care coordination
▪ Best use of the health care system
Building early organizational capacity and capability is key.
▪ Get ahead of the curve
▪ Build a plan
▪ Start now
4
5. IN THIS WEBINAR, WE ADDRESS:
Fundamental drivers of change that impact the ED
Tactics for short term effectiveness
and long term readiness
Functions in the ED that should be augmented,
newly created, or curtailed
Preparing for new reimbursement models
Frameworks for assessing the readiness of your ED
for change
5
6. HEALTH CARE
AND
THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT:
BACKGROUND AND PERSPECTIVES
6
7. EMERGENCY MEDICINE:
FACTS & REALITIES
ED treats a broad range of medical and surgical
conditions
▪ 130 million annual ED visits in the U.S.
▪ Emergent care: 10-16% of visits
▪ Intermediate/complex conditions: 31-57% of visits
▪ Minor conditions: 12-40% of visits
Emergency care represents 7-11% of health care costs
7
8. EMERGENCY MEDICINE:
FACTS & REALITIES
The ED as the hub of the enterprise:
▪ Patient experience and community perception
▪ Quality measures
▪ Market share and revenue
▪ Medical staff satisfaction
▪ Utilization and cost
8
9. Existing demand for ED care
Broad range of patients
High fixed cost
Center for decision-making
▪ Hospitalization
▪ Advanced imaging
▪ Coordination of care
Centralized management hub
▪ Prioritization and implementation of initiatives
▪ Flexibility for rapid-cycle adjustments
24/7 availability
9
WHY LEVERAGE THE ED?
9
10. “RIGHT-SIZING” THE ED INVOLVES:
1. The ED itself
Foundations and fundamentals
Expand care coordination
2. Right-sizing key interfaces
Admissions
Near-admissions
3. Right-sizing patient care after the ED encounter
Transitions of care
Patient care follow up
4. Right-sizing utilization of the ED
Best use of the health care system
10
12. POLL QUESTION
What is the most important way that EDs need to
change to improve value in health care?
A. Increase in size to accommodate higher demand and
reduce crowding
B. Expand services to enhance care coordination with non-ED
physicians
C. Decrease in size so patients can go to more appropriate
settings
D. Work on internal processes to improve treatment pathways
12
14. EMERGENCY MEDICINE IN HEALTH
REFORM
The ED must have excellent foundations
Acute illness and injury
Time-sensitive conditions
Undifferentiated conditions
Unscheduled care
Traditional functions must be refined and enhanced
Active management of care transitions
Integration with broader health system
Value-driven care
Changing the approach to intermediate and complex conditions may
result in significant cost-efficiency
Building early organizational capacity and capability is key
Responding to changes
Getting ahead of the curve
Build a plan
Start now
14
16. RIGHT-SIZING THE ED ITSELF
FUNDAMENTALS & FOUNDATIONS
Space and equipment
Provider staffing
Effective leadership
Quality Care
▪ Acute treatment of sick and injured
▪ Time-sensitive conditions
▪ Rapid Diagnostic center
▪ EMS direction and coordination
▪ Disaster preparedness and response
▪ Safety net care
Departmental efficiency
▪ Input
▪ Throughput
▪ Output
16
20. RIGHT-SIZING EMERGENCY CARE
TRANSITIONS INTO THE HOSPITAL
TRANSITIONS TO THE COMMUNITY
A. CRITICALLY ILL, COMPLEX PATIENTS
B. LOW ACUITY PATIENTS
C. MODERATELY COMPLEX CONDITIONS
COMPLEX CHRONIC CONDITIONS
(clear hospitalizations)
(clear discharges to home)
(possible hospitalizations)
20
21. RIGHT-SIZING EMERGENCY CARE
CRITICALLY ILL / COMPLEX PATIENTS
Examples:
Multiple trauma
STEMI
Stroke
Early identification of sepsis
Opportunities (keys to right-sizing):
Agreed-upon care pathways
Effective communication and transitions of care
Quality measurement and optimization
Utilization reviews
Proper documentation
Provider feedback
Efficient patient flow is still a high priority
21
22. RIGHT-SIZING EMERGENCY CARE
LOW ACUITY PATIENTS
Examples:
Upper respiratory infection
Acute otitis
Ankle sprain
Opportunities (keys to right-sizing):
Clear discharge instructions
Patient teaching
Clear plan and referral for high value after-care
Education about best use of health care options
(ED, primary care, urgent care, etc.)
Efficient patient flow is still a high priority
22
23. CHANGING THE APPROACH TO
INTERMEDIATE & COMPLEX CONDITIONS
Hospital admissions account for approximately 31% of health care
cost
Over half of hospital admissions come through the ED
Intermediate and complex conditions account for 75-80% of these
admissions
Examples: CHF, COPD, Diabetes, UTI, pneumonia, abdominal pain, chest
pain
Hospitals can generate significant cost-efficiencies by addressing
testing, treatment, and hospitalization patterns for intermediate
and complex conditions
These account for 31-57% of all ED visits
Reducing hospitalization in this group by 10-25% would save 1-2.5% of
all health care costs ($28B - $70B annually)
23
* “A Novel Approach to Identifying Targets for Cost Reduction in the Emergency Department.”
Smulowitz, Peter B., et. al.
Health Policy/Concepts, Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2012
23
24. RIGHT-SIZING EMERGENCY CARE
MODERATELY COMPLEX CONDITIONS
CHRONIC CONDITIONS
Examples:
Complex chronic conditions:
Congestive heart failure
COPD
Diabetic complications
Acute presentations:
Opportunities (keys to right-sizing):
Pneumonia
Abdominal pain
Atypical chest pain
Identify high-frequency or high-risk groups
Engage providers to determine care pathways
Create alternative hospital-based resources, such as:
ED observation units
Dedicated rapid treatment units
Hospitalist or specialist consultation with in ED
Consistently utilize the mechanism that delivers value & efficiency
Identify clinical and practical solutions to patient groups that require
longitudinal care after ED treatment
Ensure seamless coordination of care and provider communication
Plan for timely follow-up
24
25. RIGHT-SIZING EMERGENCY CARE
MODERATELY COMPLEX CONDITIONS
CHRONIC CONDITIONS
Time, resources & space are required
Time-based throughput goals are a secondary priority
Diagnostic precision and care coordination is
paramount
25
26. POLL QUESTION
At this time, do you think your ED should change
its approach to intermediate and complex
conditions?
A. Yes
B. Yes, but not now
C. Not now and probably not later, either
26
28. OUTSIDE THE FOUR WALLS
PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE
Right-sizing patient care after the ED
encounter
Transitions of care
Patient care follow up
Right-sizing utilization of the ED
Best use of the health care system
28
30. RIGHT-SIZING PATIENT CARE AFTER THE
ED VISIT
Appropriate transitions of care
Care coordination
Case management and disease management (home monitoring,
medication management, follow-up clinic, etc.)
Primary care (assignment, availability, appointment, visit
assurance)
Other follow-up care (medication checks, etc.)
Palliative care
Telemedicine solutions
Use the ED as a “Canary in the Coal Mine”
Early warning system
Indicator of processes and resources needed to optimize value
30
32. RIGHT-SIZING UTILIZATION OF THE ED
Patient education on choosing site of care
(in the context of local health care resources)
Systems for managing care-seeking behavior
Mutual efforts with employers and payors
Managing high cost utilizers
Deploying innovative solutions (telemedicine, etc.)
Creating alternatives for low-acuity care that could be
managed in other settings
▪ Primary care
▪ Urgent care
▪ Options for uninsured
▪ Employer-driven options
32
33. Estimates of preventable ED visits vary widely
(10-40% of all ED visits)
▪ Some rely on final diagnosis, rather than presenting condition
▪ Non-emergent visits cannot be reliably predicted based on
presenting complaint (Raven, et. Al.)
Low-acuity visits still need medical care
▪ They also incur costs, which must also be considered
Even so, eliminating half of all ED visits for minor illness or
injury results in saving only 0.2 – 0.8% of all health care
costs. (Smulowitz, et.al.)
▪ Much smaller impact than intermediate/complex conditions
▪ Complicated by EMTALA mandate & prudent layperson standard
▪ Difficult management
33
WHAT ABOUT PREVENTABLE ED VISITS?
33
36. FAST CARE AT ALL COSTS FOR ALL PATIENT TYPES
WON’T WORK ANYMORE
Take necessary time to address moderate complexity
patients potentially requiring hospitalization.
This is perhaps the greatest near-term potential for
enhanced value for the ED.
Requires:
▪ Clear clinical strategies
▪ Different processes in ED
▪ Space
▪ Sufficient staff
36
37. ATTEMPTING TO AVOID THE ED AT ALL COSTS
IS UNLIKELY TO PRODUCE THE GREATEST VALUE
However, cost-efficient alternatives to ED care for certain
conditions may be valuable for hospitals, health systems,
and patients.
Alternatives must be readily available, timely, and accessible.
Alternatives must also coordinate care with other elements of the
system.
If no timely or accessible alternatives exist, efficient utilization of
the ED is best, with concurrent patient education.
Cost-efficiency requires scale, availability, and partnerships.
Requires significant effort (and resources)
37
38. THE SAFETY NET FUNCTION OF THE ED MUST BE
RECOGNIZED AND ACCOMMODATED
Most communities and delivery systems will continue to
struggle with availability and access to primary care.
EMTALA requirements and the prudent layperson standard
will continue to force cost-shifting.
Lower reimbursing payers do not cover the cost of care.
Comparing the cost of ED care with other settings is difficult.
Health care safety net comes at a cost.
Standby and surge capacity comes at a cost.
Capability for treating a large range of conditions comes at a cost.
Reinforces the need to leverage the ED’s fixed costs.
38
39. THE ED IS AN IMPORTANT SECONDARY HUB FOR
MANAGING THE HEALTH OF POPULATIONS
Leverage the ED’s position at the interface of ambulatory and
inpatient care.
When appropriately resourced, the ED can be a key setting for:
preventing ambulatory care sensitive admissions and readmissions
connecting patients to primary care
Forward-thinking organizations must embrace the role of the ED
in bending the healthcare cost curve.
Patients with the highest healthcare spending will end up in the ED.
Must build strong connections:
for hospitalized patients
back to the ambulatory care continuum
39
40. EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
Increasingly identified as a strategic asset
for hospital-based care
Can be leveraged to address significant issues
for hospitals and health systems
Must be:
Effective in today’s environment
Right-sized for the future
Optimized for health care value in both
40
43. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
Emergency Care and the Public’s Health
Edited by Dr. Jesse Pines
A Novel Approach to Identifying Targets for Cost
Reduction in the Emergency Department.
Smulowitz, Peter B., et. al. (2012). Health
Policy/Concepts. Annals of Emergency Medicine.
Modern Healthcare Perspectives:
Right-Sizing the Emergency Department in Health
Care Reform
ModernHealthcare.com/Perspectives_Schumacher
ED Rapid Assessment Tool
ed-assessment.schumachergroup.com
43
J
28% of first contact care*
5% of the physician workforce
* Where Americans Get Their Health Care: Increasingly, it’s not at their doctor’s office. Pitts SR, Carrier ER, Rich EC, Kellerman AL, Health Affairs 29, no 9 [2010]; 1620-1629
J
28% of first contact care*
5% of the physician workforce
* Where Americans Get Their Health Care: Increasingly, it’s not at their doctor’s office. Pitts SR, Carrier ER, Rich EC, Kellerman AL, Health Affairs 29, no 9 [2010]; 1620-1629
J
J – (concept only) –
Moderator
B
B
B (this can be short. . .)
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
I’m still struggling a bit with the distinction between moderately complex patients and complex chronic conditions. I like Smulowitz’s grouping of these together as depicted on this slide. It would be easier to make our point as we wouldn’t have to distinguish between two groups that sound an awful lot alike.
B
B
Moderator
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
Health plan structures, payment mechanisms, & patient advisements