2. Brief History
Began in Great Britain in 1710
First copyright law in the United States was in 1790
First Copyright Act was in 1909
Fair Use Doctrine
3. Recent Cases
Naruto v. Slater (2018)
Photographer, David Slater
Macaque, Naruto
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)
District court concluded Naruto failed to establish standing
under the Copyright Act
4. Recent Cases
Agence France Presse v. Morel (2010)
Photographer, Daniel Morel
Agence France Presse
Getty Images
Court concluded Morel be awarded the maximum statutory
penalty under the Copyright Act
5. Law Review
Ad agencies need to take more steps to protect their distinctive creative work.
Blogging has led to “blogsquatting” which frequently violates copyright.
The Copyright Extension Act of 1998 allows copyright terms that are more than the lifespan
of the average American.
The infringement analysis of music needs to improve in order to have a clear difference
between plagiarism and homage when writing music.
6. Conclusion
The growing digital area has influenced”
How copyright ownership is given
The way copyright infringement is handled
Future Legal Questions:
How will copyright law evolve with more technological advances?
How much ownership should a creator have of their product and for how long?
7. References
Agence France Presse v. Morel, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139103 (2010).
Hannibal, Travis (Spring, 2007). RECLAIMING THE FIRST AMENDMENT: CONSTITUTIONAL
THEORIES OF MEDIA REFORM: OF BLOGS, EBOOKS, AND BROADBAND: ACCESS TO
DIGITAL MEDIA AS A FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT. Hofstra Law Review, 35, 1519. Retrieved
from https://advance-lexis-com.leo.lib.unomaha.edu/api/document?collection=analytical-
materials&id=urn:contentItem:4PYR-81P0-00CW-G0FY-00000-00&context=1516831.
Kemp, Gail. (1994, November). Live Issue/Creative Copyright: Agencies should take steps to
protect their work - Copyrighting creative work may seem distasteful but is necessary.
Mercer Law Review, 60, 927. Retrieved from https://advance-lexis-
com.leo.lib.unomaha.edu/api/document?collection=analytical-
materials&id=urn:contentItem:4WD2-48V0-00CW-40SJ-00000-00&context=1516831.
8. References
Lisby, Greg (2019). Intellectual Property, in W. Wat Hopkins, Communication and the Law,
2019 Edition (pp. 233-260). Northport, AL: Vision Press.
Naruto v. Slater, 888 F.3d 418, (2018).
Wynn, Alison P. (2017). NOTE: COPYRIGHT LAW - Unique Characteristics of Music Warrant
its Own System: How Adopting the Intended Audience Test Can Save Music Copyright
Litigation. Western New England Law Review, 39, 1. Retrieved from https://advance-lexis-
com.leo.lib.unomaha.edu/api/document?collection=analytical-
materials&id=urn:contentItem:5N7W-DPV0-00CV-2158-00000-00&context=1516831.