SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 20
OG&E Utilizes Ballasted Clarification
for Coal Pile Runoff Pond
Matt Grimes
Lead Envirochemist
Michael Reyes
National Sales Manager
Mobile Water Services
Introduction
• Oklahoma Gas & Electric (OG&E) utilized ballasted clarification to help
drain down (dewater) over 50 million gallons of water and recover coal
from an active coal pile runoff pond.
• The Muskogee plant has a NPDES discharge permit for the pond effluent,
but typically evaporation maintains the pond water level.
• The normal settling characteristics of the pond do not typically provide the
level of clarity the station desires when discharging.
• Several technologies had been trialed with undesirable results until
ballasted clarification was piloted.
• Heavy rains late spring 2015 accelerated the need for dewatering, so an
emergency mobile clarification trailer capable of 1 – 2 MGD was deployed.
Veolia Water Technologies provided the mobile service utilizing Actiflo®
Turbo. This presentation highlights the various technologies tested and
dives into the details of the ballasted technology results from the pilot and
emergency service.
Topics
• OGE Energy Corp.
• Problem Statement
• Past Experiences
• Ballasted Technology
• Pilot Effort
• Mobile Deployment
• Economics
• Conclusions
OGE Energy Corp.
• Largest regulated utility in Oklahoma
• Started in 1902
• Approximately 800,000 customers spanning
30,000 square miles in Oklahoma and western
Arkansas.
• Company is committed to operating in a cost-
effective manner which meets or exceeds
requirements established in environmental
laws and regulations.
Muskogee Generating Station
• 3-550 MW Coal Fired
Plants
• Permitted discharge
includes CT blowdown,
Low Volume Waste,
Coal Pile Runoff
Coal Pile Run Off Pond
• 20 acres surface
• 70 acre drainage
area.
• 23 Million GL
(normal level)
• Evaporation
• Natural Settling
before NPDES
Discharge
Problem Statement
• Turbidity was higher than desired for discharge
– Clear pond TSS was still 100 – 1000 mg/l and the
majority of the mass was 1 – 10 micron.
– Stokes law indicates 0.5 – 55 hours to settle 1’
1 – 10 microns with density similar to silica sand
• May 2015 13” of rain fell compared to
3.5”/month previous Springs
• Dam repairs needed due to beavers
Past Experiences
• Natural settling
– Challenges with stokes law and light particles
• Different pond decanting locations
• Conventional clarification
– Low rise rates and sun convection problems
• Dissolved Air Floatation
• Compressible Sponge-like Media Filters
– TSS loading
• Manual batch treatment tank & decanting
Ballasted Technology
Conventional Vs. High Rate
Sludge blanket
clarifier
Standard Clarifier
MULTIFLO,
DAF or
Lamella ACTIFLO®
ACTIFLO®
Pilot Effort
• Inlet Conditions of 40 – 550 mg/l TSS
• Jar Testing
– Inorganic (Al based) + Organic Coagulant
– Anionic Flocculant, Medium to High MW and Charge
– Micro-sand 100 – 150 microns
– Iron coagulation also worked, but required supplement
alkalinity
• Actiflo® Pilot Trailer – Nominal 100 GPM
• Operated Sept. 26th to Oct 24th, 6 days a week, 10 hour
shifts
• Tested 85 – 190 GPM (20 – 45 gpm/ft2)
– 42 gpm/ft2 provided < 15 ppm TSS
Pilot Effort - TSS
Raw Water
50 – 500 ppm
Effluent
< 15 ppm
Sludge
0.15 – 1.5%
Or ~ 30X
Pilot Effort – Sludge Recycle
Pilot Effort – Rx Time & Micro-sand
Reaction Time
• To determine impact of coagulant reaction time the
injection points were moved from the first coagulation tank
to the inlet of the floc tank, prior to sand injection.
• Within minutes of the change, NTU spiked from 1.7 to 16
NTU, so feed points were moved back. Five minutes later,
effluent was back to 2 NTU.
Micro-sand Dosage
• Pilot averaged 6 g/l, 3 – 10 g/l is typical.
• At one point concentration dropped to 3 g/l and effluent
TSS spiked from 15 to 35 ppm. Inlet was 370 ppm at this
time. Corrected concentration, corrected effluent quality.
Pilot Effort – Metals & PSA
Metals
• 3rd Party analysis on influent & effluent – below lab limit, except influent
zinc at 0.12 mg/l.
• Effluent zinc lab limit of 0.01 mg/l
• Aluminum < 0.3 mg/l typical of utilizing aluminum base coagulants
Particle Size Analysis
• Majority of influent mass was 1 – 10 micron
Mobile Deployment
• Arrived onsite on a Friday
• Discharging water by Monday
• Treatment flows of 600 – 800 GPM limited
by sump pump
• Influent TSS 100 – 1,000 mg/l
– Particle size 1 - 10 microns
• Effluent TSS << 50 mg/l
Economics
• Mobile campaign treated and discharged 50 Million Gallons
• Mobile system was onsite 3 months
– Some interruptions in treatment to free up pockets of pond water
• Services cost was competitive with typical urban sewer rates
• Once pond was dewater, $5,000,000 in unburnt coal was made
available
Conclusions
• Muskogee’s coal pile run off pond water was difficult to treat
conventionally
• Piloting provided optimization and insurances in ballasted clarification
• Piloting and upfront due diligence made mobilization and startup fast and
efficient
• Mobile treatment proved economically attractive versus permanent
capital installation
OG&E Utilizes Ballasted Clarification
for Coal Pile Runoff Pond
Matt Grimes
Lead Envirochemist
Michael Reyes
National Sales Manager
Mobile Water Services

More Related Content

Similar to OG&E Uses Ballasted Clarification for Coal Pond

Final ppt dissertation
Final ppt dissertationFinal ppt dissertation
Final ppt dissertationLokesh Saini
 
New Side Stream Electrostatic Water Treatment
New Side Stream Electrostatic Water TreatmentNew Side Stream Electrostatic Water Treatment
New Side Stream Electrostatic Water TreatmentGeorge Wagner II
 
Coal Seam Gas Mining - Dairy Australia - Victorian overview presentation poowong
Coal Seam Gas Mining - Dairy Australia - Victorian overview presentation poowongCoal Seam Gas Mining - Dairy Australia - Victorian overview presentation poowong
Coal Seam Gas Mining - Dairy Australia - Victorian overview presentation poowongDairy Australia
 
Presentation 1 ai ch e ultra pure 030807
Presentation 1 ai ch e ultra pure 030807Presentation 1 ai ch e ultra pure 030807
Presentation 1 ai ch e ultra pure 030807Gary Burgess - PE
 
Water Treatment_CSIR NEERI_Indovation 2015_23 January 2015
Water Treatment_CSIR NEERI_Indovation 2015_23 January 2015Water Treatment_CSIR NEERI_Indovation 2015_23 January 2015
Water Treatment_CSIR NEERI_Indovation 2015_23 January 2015India Water Portal
 
MSC Imperial Dissertation Display Poster
MSC Imperial Dissertation Display PosterMSC Imperial Dissertation Display Poster
MSC Imperial Dissertation Display PosterAnkur Ghosh
 
Manufacture of caustic soda and chlorine using electrolysis process ...
Manufacture of caustic soda and chlorine using electrolysis process          ...Manufacture of caustic soda and chlorine using electrolysis process          ...
Manufacture of caustic soda and chlorine using electrolysis process ...Ankush Gupta
 
03 En Actiflo Softening
03 En Actiflo Softening03 En Actiflo Softening
03 En Actiflo Softeningguest10a8db
 
DPW Waterworks Presentation July2009
DPW Waterworks Presentation July2009DPW Waterworks Presentation July2009
DPW Waterworks Presentation July2009Franklin Matters
 
205064496-Water-Treatment-Calculations-Updated.pptx
205064496-Water-Treatment-Calculations-Updated.pptx205064496-Water-Treatment-Calculations-Updated.pptx
205064496-Water-Treatment-Calculations-Updated.pptxMarco Meza
 
zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516
zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516
zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516Daniel Eyde
 
Laura Miller - CCS Projects – Presentation at the Global CCS Institute Member...
Laura Miller - CCS Projects – Presentation at the Global CCS Institute Member...Laura Miller - CCS Projects – Presentation at the Global CCS Institute Member...
Laura Miller - CCS Projects – Presentation at the Global CCS Institute Member...Global CCS Institute
 
Microbial transport from Dairying under different irrigation systems in Cante...
Microbial transport from Dairying under different irrigation systems in Cante...Microbial transport from Dairying under different irrigation systems in Cante...
Microbial transport from Dairying under different irrigation systems in Cante...aimeew
 
OTEC (Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion)
OTEC (Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion)OTEC (Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion)
OTEC (Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion)Ashish Bandewar
 
Siltflux workshop 1: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John C...
Siltflux workshop 1: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John C...Siltflux workshop 1: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John C...
Siltflux workshop 1: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John C...Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland
 
Technical Note
Technical NoteTechnical Note
Technical NoteZim Obi
 

Similar to OG&E Uses Ballasted Clarification for Coal Pond (20)

ATS
ATSATS
ATS
 
Final ppt dissertation
Final ppt dissertationFinal ppt dissertation
Final ppt dissertation
 
wtp_ppt_ub.ppt
wtp_ppt_ub.pptwtp_ppt_ub.ppt
wtp_ppt_ub.ppt
 
New Side Stream Electrostatic Water Treatment
New Side Stream Electrostatic Water TreatmentNew Side Stream Electrostatic Water Treatment
New Side Stream Electrostatic Water Treatment
 
Coal Seam Gas Mining - Dairy Australia - Victorian overview presentation poowong
Coal Seam Gas Mining - Dairy Australia - Victorian overview presentation poowongCoal Seam Gas Mining - Dairy Australia - Victorian overview presentation poowong
Coal Seam Gas Mining - Dairy Australia - Victorian overview presentation poowong
 
Presentation 1 ai ch e ultra pure 030807
Presentation 1 ai ch e ultra pure 030807Presentation 1 ai ch e ultra pure 030807
Presentation 1 ai ch e ultra pure 030807
 
Water Treatment_CSIR NEERI_Indovation 2015_23 January 2015
Water Treatment_CSIR NEERI_Indovation 2015_23 January 2015Water Treatment_CSIR NEERI_Indovation 2015_23 January 2015
Water Treatment_CSIR NEERI_Indovation 2015_23 January 2015
 
MSC Imperial Dissertation Display Poster
MSC Imperial Dissertation Display PosterMSC Imperial Dissertation Display Poster
MSC Imperial Dissertation Display Poster
 
Manufacture of caustic soda and chlorine using electrolysis process ...
Manufacture of caustic soda and chlorine using electrolysis process          ...Manufacture of caustic soda and chlorine using electrolysis process          ...
Manufacture of caustic soda and chlorine using electrolysis process ...
 
03 En Actiflo Softening
03 En Actiflo Softening03 En Actiflo Softening
03 En Actiflo Softening
 
DPW Waterworks Presentation July2009
DPW Waterworks Presentation July2009DPW Waterworks Presentation July2009
DPW Waterworks Presentation July2009
 
205064496-Water-Treatment-Calculations-Updated.pptx
205064496-Water-Treatment-Calculations-Updated.pptx205064496-Water-Treatment-Calculations-Updated.pptx
205064496-Water-Treatment-Calculations-Updated.pptx
 
zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516
zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516
zeolite anammox process st cloud 081516
 
Laura Miller - CCS Projects – Presentation at the Global CCS Institute Member...
Laura Miller - CCS Projects – Presentation at the Global CCS Institute Member...Laura Miller - CCS Projects – Presentation at the Global CCS Institute Member...
Laura Miller - CCS Projects – Presentation at the Global CCS Institute Member...
 
Microbial transport from Dairying under different irrigation systems in Cante...
Microbial transport from Dairying under different irrigation systems in Cante...Microbial transport from Dairying under different irrigation systems in Cante...
Microbial transport from Dairying under different irrigation systems in Cante...
 
OTEC (Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion)
OTEC (Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion)OTEC (Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion)
OTEC (Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion)
 
Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke
Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John ClarkeEffects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke
Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke
 
Siltflux workshop 1: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John C...
Siltflux workshop 1: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John C...Siltflux workshop 1: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John C...
Siltflux workshop 1: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John C...
 
Technical Note
Technical NoteTechnical Note
Technical Note
 
poster_Emily
poster_Emilyposter_Emily
poster_Emily
 

OG&E Uses Ballasted Clarification for Coal Pond

  • 1. OG&E Utilizes Ballasted Clarification for Coal Pile Runoff Pond Matt Grimes Lead Envirochemist Michael Reyes National Sales Manager Mobile Water Services
  • 2. Introduction • Oklahoma Gas & Electric (OG&E) utilized ballasted clarification to help drain down (dewater) over 50 million gallons of water and recover coal from an active coal pile runoff pond. • The Muskogee plant has a NPDES discharge permit for the pond effluent, but typically evaporation maintains the pond water level. • The normal settling characteristics of the pond do not typically provide the level of clarity the station desires when discharging. • Several technologies had been trialed with undesirable results until ballasted clarification was piloted. • Heavy rains late spring 2015 accelerated the need for dewatering, so an emergency mobile clarification trailer capable of 1 – 2 MGD was deployed. Veolia Water Technologies provided the mobile service utilizing Actiflo® Turbo. This presentation highlights the various technologies tested and dives into the details of the ballasted technology results from the pilot and emergency service.
  • 3. Topics • OGE Energy Corp. • Problem Statement • Past Experiences • Ballasted Technology • Pilot Effort • Mobile Deployment • Economics • Conclusions
  • 4. OGE Energy Corp. • Largest regulated utility in Oklahoma • Started in 1902 • Approximately 800,000 customers spanning 30,000 square miles in Oklahoma and western Arkansas. • Company is committed to operating in a cost- effective manner which meets or exceeds requirements established in environmental laws and regulations.
  • 5. Muskogee Generating Station • 3-550 MW Coal Fired Plants • Permitted discharge includes CT blowdown, Low Volume Waste, Coal Pile Runoff
  • 6. Coal Pile Run Off Pond • 20 acres surface • 70 acre drainage area. • 23 Million GL (normal level) • Evaporation • Natural Settling before NPDES Discharge
  • 7. Problem Statement • Turbidity was higher than desired for discharge – Clear pond TSS was still 100 – 1000 mg/l and the majority of the mass was 1 – 10 micron. – Stokes law indicates 0.5 – 55 hours to settle 1’ 1 – 10 microns with density similar to silica sand • May 2015 13” of rain fell compared to 3.5”/month previous Springs • Dam repairs needed due to beavers
  • 8. Past Experiences • Natural settling – Challenges with stokes law and light particles • Different pond decanting locations • Conventional clarification – Low rise rates and sun convection problems • Dissolved Air Floatation • Compressible Sponge-like Media Filters – TSS loading • Manual batch treatment tank & decanting
  • 10. Conventional Vs. High Rate Sludge blanket clarifier Standard Clarifier MULTIFLO, DAF or Lamella ACTIFLO® ACTIFLO®
  • 11.
  • 12. Pilot Effort • Inlet Conditions of 40 – 550 mg/l TSS • Jar Testing – Inorganic (Al based) + Organic Coagulant – Anionic Flocculant, Medium to High MW and Charge – Micro-sand 100 – 150 microns – Iron coagulation also worked, but required supplement alkalinity • Actiflo® Pilot Trailer – Nominal 100 GPM • Operated Sept. 26th to Oct 24th, 6 days a week, 10 hour shifts • Tested 85 – 190 GPM (20 – 45 gpm/ft2) – 42 gpm/ft2 provided < 15 ppm TSS
  • 13. Pilot Effort - TSS Raw Water 50 – 500 ppm Effluent < 15 ppm Sludge 0.15 – 1.5% Or ~ 30X
  • 14. Pilot Effort – Sludge Recycle
  • 15. Pilot Effort – Rx Time & Micro-sand Reaction Time • To determine impact of coagulant reaction time the injection points were moved from the first coagulation tank to the inlet of the floc tank, prior to sand injection. • Within minutes of the change, NTU spiked from 1.7 to 16 NTU, so feed points were moved back. Five minutes later, effluent was back to 2 NTU. Micro-sand Dosage • Pilot averaged 6 g/l, 3 – 10 g/l is typical. • At one point concentration dropped to 3 g/l and effluent TSS spiked from 15 to 35 ppm. Inlet was 370 ppm at this time. Corrected concentration, corrected effluent quality.
  • 16. Pilot Effort – Metals & PSA Metals • 3rd Party analysis on influent & effluent – below lab limit, except influent zinc at 0.12 mg/l. • Effluent zinc lab limit of 0.01 mg/l • Aluminum < 0.3 mg/l typical of utilizing aluminum base coagulants Particle Size Analysis • Majority of influent mass was 1 – 10 micron
  • 17. Mobile Deployment • Arrived onsite on a Friday • Discharging water by Monday • Treatment flows of 600 – 800 GPM limited by sump pump • Influent TSS 100 – 1,000 mg/l – Particle size 1 - 10 microns • Effluent TSS << 50 mg/l
  • 18. Economics • Mobile campaign treated and discharged 50 Million Gallons • Mobile system was onsite 3 months – Some interruptions in treatment to free up pockets of pond water • Services cost was competitive with typical urban sewer rates • Once pond was dewater, $5,000,000 in unburnt coal was made available
  • 19. Conclusions • Muskogee’s coal pile run off pond water was difficult to treat conventionally • Piloting provided optimization and insurances in ballasted clarification • Piloting and upfront due diligence made mobilization and startup fast and efficient • Mobile treatment proved economically attractive versus permanent capital installation
  • 20. OG&E Utilizes Ballasted Clarification for Coal Pile Runoff Pond Matt Grimes Lead Envirochemist Michael Reyes National Sales Manager Mobile Water Services

Editor's Notes

  1. Coal Pile Run Off Pond (CPROP) relies on natural settling before discharge if evaporation is not sufficient. NPDES permit requires < 50 mg/l TSS monthly average; however, OG&E prefers improved turbidity removal
  2. 2015 Apr,May,June – averaged 7.6”/month as compared to 3.5”/month average same period 2012-2014. May 2015 was 13” compared to
  3. Re-used effluent from old batch treatment as cooling tower make-up when unit was in operation.
  4. < 15 ppm is when rise rate was < 42 gpm/ft2 Sludge concentration is relatively fixed since hydrocyclone flow is fixed Difference in floc tank vs. raw is chemical additional and sludge recycle when used.
  5. (GET CLEANER CHART) It was evident from the log sheet and graph that sludge recycle was effective in helping reduce the effluent TSS.