SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
To Vote, or Not to Vote?
Experienced and Anticipatory Affect Matters
Michael C.H. Chan1, Lauren C. Howe1, Eunice G. Buhler2, James J. Gross1
1Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States 2Northwestern University School of Law, Chicago, IL, United States
Introduction
Presidential elections in the US are emotionally charged
events (Scheibe, Mata, & Carstensen, 2011). But how affect
influences political engagement has yet to be explored.
Using the American National Election Studies (ANES) 2008
time series study, we examined how present and future
affective orientations motivate voting behavior.
Hypotheses
Results
Voting likelihood will be predicted by:
Hypothesis 1a: Respondents’ feelings toward candidates
(feeling thermometer).
Hypothesis 1b: Specific emotions toward candidates (pride,
hope, anger, and fear).
Hypothesis 2: Affective forecasting about election outcomes
(predicted happiness if candidate wins).
Study 1a:
- The more positively Democrats (N = 977) felt toward Obama
pre-election, the more likely they were to vote in the 2008
election, p < .001*. Democrats’ feelings toward McCain did not
predict voting behavior, p = .37.
- The more positively Republicans (N = 432) felt toward
McCain pre-election, the more likely they were to vote in the
2008 election, p < .001. Republicans who felt more negatively
about Obama were also more likely to vote, p = .003.
Results (Cont’d)
Study 1b:
Increased pride towards the affiliated party candidate predicted voting in
the 2008 election (Dem: p = .01; Rep: p = .002). Hope, anger, and fear towards
the other candidate did not predict voting.
Study 2:
The happier Democrats thought they would feel if Obama won, p < .001*
and the happier Republicans thought they would feel if McCain won, p < .
001, the more likely they were to vote.
*Control for education levels of voters, voting frequency of individuals,
and whether individuals had voted in 2004 or not.
The sadder Democrats thought they would feel if McCain won, p < .001*
and the sadder Republicans thought they would feel if Obama won, p = .
001, the more likely they were to vote.
Summary
- Affect, experienced and anticipatory,
motivates American voters from both
parties to vote.
- Positive emotions, such as pride towards
one’s candidate, may play a special role in
political engagement.
References
Scheibe, S., Mata, R., & Carstensen, L. (2011). Age differences in affective
forecasting and experienced emotion surrounding the 2008 U.S.
presidential election. Cognition & emotion, 25(6), 1029–1044.
The American National Election Studies (ANES;
www.electionstudies.org). The ANES 2008 Time Series Study
[dataset]. Stanford University and the University of Michigan
[producers].
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Jon Krosnick and the Stanford
Psychophysiology Lab for their support and advice on the
study.

More Related Content

Similar to Poster_ISRE2013

Text Messaging Field Experiment (RootsCampDC 12/06)
Text Messaging Field Experiment (RootsCampDC 12/06)Text Messaging Field Experiment (RootsCampDC 12/06)
Text Messaging Field Experiment (RootsCampDC 12/06)rootscamp
 
Data analysis research (relatability study)
Data analysis research (relatability study)Data analysis research (relatability study)
Data analysis research (relatability study)Joseph White MPA CPM
 
A2 G&P invisible primaries
A2 G&P invisible primariesA2 G&P invisible primaries
A2 G&P invisible primariesOliver Pratten
 
Establishing a Baseline for Math Anxiety at NNMC 2015.vers1
Establishing a Baseline for Math Anxiety at NNMC 2015.vers1Establishing a Baseline for Math Anxiety at NNMC 2015.vers1
Establishing a Baseline for Math Anxiety at NNMC 2015.vers1Stephanie Amedeo Marquez
 
Murray Gabriel Djupe #2
Murray Gabriel Djupe #2Murray Gabriel Djupe #2
Murray Gabriel Djupe #2Gabriel Murray
 
Analysis of 2020 USA Presidential Election
Analysis of 2020 USA Presidential Election Analysis of 2020 USA Presidential Election
Analysis of 2020 USA Presidential Election Jun Steed Huang
 
Adolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factors
Adolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factorsAdolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factors
Adolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factorsferrellnl
 
Adolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factors
Adolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factorsAdolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factors
Adolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factorsferrellnl
 
inbound9052431662496352580.pptx
inbound9052431662496352580.pptxinbound9052431662496352580.pptx
inbound9052431662496352580.pptxReyensepedo1
 
Gross_Nedler_Ukani_Final Paper
Gross_Nedler_Ukani_Final PaperGross_Nedler_Ukani_Final Paper
Gross_Nedler_Ukani_Final PaperEvan Gross
 
Discussion forum(sangwon)
Discussion forum(sangwon)Discussion forum(sangwon)
Discussion forum(sangwon)Sangwon Lee
 
Read Jim Dodges novel Fup and answer the f.docx
Read    Jim   Dodges   novel    Fup    and   answer   the   f.docxRead    Jim   Dodges   novel    Fup    and   answer   the   f.docx
Read Jim Dodges novel Fup and answer the f.docxaudeleypearl
 
Cognitive Dissonance Lit Review
Cognitive Dissonance Lit ReviewCognitive Dissonance Lit Review
Cognitive Dissonance Lit ReviewWilliam Beer
 
U.S. Mind and Mood Report
U.S. Mind and Mood ReportU.S. Mind and Mood Report
U.S. Mind and Mood ReportHavas PR
 

Similar to Poster_ISRE2013 (20)

Complete Study
Complete StudyComplete Study
Complete Study
 
poster
posterposter
poster
 
Text Messaging Field Experiment (RootsCampDC 12/06)
Text Messaging Field Experiment (RootsCampDC 12/06)Text Messaging Field Experiment (RootsCampDC 12/06)
Text Messaging Field Experiment (RootsCampDC 12/06)
 
Data analysis research (relatability study)
Data analysis research (relatability study)Data analysis research (relatability study)
Data analysis research (relatability study)
 
A2 G&P invisible primaries
A2 G&P invisible primariesA2 G&P invisible primaries
A2 G&P invisible primaries
 
Establishing a Baseline for Math Anxiety at NNMC 2015.vers1
Establishing a Baseline for Math Anxiety at NNMC 2015.vers1Establishing a Baseline for Math Anxiety at NNMC 2015.vers1
Establishing a Baseline for Math Anxiety at NNMC 2015.vers1
 
Monitoring of the Last US Presidential Elections
Monitoring of the Last US Presidential ElectionsMonitoring of the Last US Presidential Elections
Monitoring of the Last US Presidential Elections
 
Weinberger07
Weinberger07Weinberger07
Weinberger07
 
Murray Gabriel Djupe #2
Murray Gabriel Djupe #2Murray Gabriel Djupe #2
Murray Gabriel Djupe #2
 
Analysis of 2020 USA Presidential Election
Analysis of 2020 USA Presidential Election Analysis of 2020 USA Presidential Election
Analysis of 2020 USA Presidential Election
 
When are politically irrelevant events relevant to election outcomes?
When are politically irrelevant events relevant to election outcomes?When are politically irrelevant events relevant to election outcomes?
When are politically irrelevant events relevant to election outcomes?
 
Adolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factors
Adolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factorsAdolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factors
Adolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factors
 
Adolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factors
Adolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factorsAdolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factors
Adolescent suicide risk four psychosocial factors
 
inbound9052431662496352580.pptx
inbound9052431662496352580.pptxinbound9052431662496352580.pptx
inbound9052431662496352580.pptx
 
Andre blais 1
Andre blais 1Andre blais 1
Andre blais 1
 
Gross_Nedler_Ukani_Final Paper
Gross_Nedler_Ukani_Final PaperGross_Nedler_Ukani_Final Paper
Gross_Nedler_Ukani_Final Paper
 
Discussion forum(sangwon)
Discussion forum(sangwon)Discussion forum(sangwon)
Discussion forum(sangwon)
 
Read Jim Dodges novel Fup and answer the f.docx
Read    Jim   Dodges   novel    Fup    and   answer   the   f.docxRead    Jim   Dodges   novel    Fup    and   answer   the   f.docx
Read Jim Dodges novel Fup and answer the f.docx
 
Cognitive Dissonance Lit Review
Cognitive Dissonance Lit ReviewCognitive Dissonance Lit Review
Cognitive Dissonance Lit Review
 
U.S. Mind and Mood Report
U.S. Mind and Mood ReportU.S. Mind and Mood Report
U.S. Mind and Mood Report
 

Poster_ISRE2013

  • 1. To Vote, or Not to Vote? Experienced and Anticipatory Affect Matters Michael C.H. Chan1, Lauren C. Howe1, Eunice G. Buhler2, James J. Gross1 1Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States 2Northwestern University School of Law, Chicago, IL, United States Introduction Presidential elections in the US are emotionally charged events (Scheibe, Mata, & Carstensen, 2011). But how affect influences political engagement has yet to be explored. Using the American National Election Studies (ANES) 2008 time series study, we examined how present and future affective orientations motivate voting behavior. Hypotheses Results Voting likelihood will be predicted by: Hypothesis 1a: Respondents’ feelings toward candidates (feeling thermometer). Hypothesis 1b: Specific emotions toward candidates (pride, hope, anger, and fear). Hypothesis 2: Affective forecasting about election outcomes (predicted happiness if candidate wins). Study 1a: - The more positively Democrats (N = 977) felt toward Obama pre-election, the more likely they were to vote in the 2008 election, p < .001*. Democrats’ feelings toward McCain did not predict voting behavior, p = .37. - The more positively Republicans (N = 432) felt toward McCain pre-election, the more likely they were to vote in the 2008 election, p < .001. Republicans who felt more negatively about Obama were also more likely to vote, p = .003. Results (Cont’d) Study 1b: Increased pride towards the affiliated party candidate predicted voting in the 2008 election (Dem: p = .01; Rep: p = .002). Hope, anger, and fear towards the other candidate did not predict voting. Study 2: The happier Democrats thought they would feel if Obama won, p < .001* and the happier Republicans thought they would feel if McCain won, p < . 001, the more likely they were to vote. *Control for education levels of voters, voting frequency of individuals, and whether individuals had voted in 2004 or not. The sadder Democrats thought they would feel if McCain won, p < .001* and the sadder Republicans thought they would feel if Obama won, p = . 001, the more likely they were to vote. Summary - Affect, experienced and anticipatory, motivates American voters from both parties to vote. - Positive emotions, such as pride towards one’s candidate, may play a special role in political engagement. References Scheibe, S., Mata, R., & Carstensen, L. (2011). Age differences in affective forecasting and experienced emotion surrounding the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Cognition & emotion, 25(6), 1029–1044. The American National Election Studies (ANES; www.electionstudies.org). The ANES 2008 Time Series Study [dataset]. Stanford University and the University of Michigan [producers]. Acknowledgement We would like to thank Jon Krosnick and the Stanford Psychophysiology Lab for their support and advice on the study.