SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
An Afghan security official is surrounded by the shadows of colleagues as he keeps watch at the scene of an attack
on a Red Cross office in Jalalabad on May 29, 2013. (Noorullah Shirzada/AFP/Getty Images)
With New Ways to Fund Attacks, Al-Qaeda Now a Bigger Threat
June 18, 2013
| Security
Summary
The overreliance by the United States on sanctions and surveillance in the war on terror
has allowed al-Qaeda to adapt its methods of financing to avoid detection, and resulted
in a decentralized al-Qaeda structure -- and a much greater threat.
Al-Qaeda has transitioned from a hierarchical cell structure to a franchise organization
that is now responsible for four times as many terrorist attacks a year as it was before
9/11. Al-Qaeda training camps are now being established on the Arabian Peninsula, in
Africa, countries of the former Soviet Union, and Southeast Asia.
Background
The current counterterrorism strategy is to rely on economic sanctions and financial
surveillance to identify and then stop terrorist financing. Examples of this are the U.S.
PATRIOT Act, UN Resolution 1617, and the EU’s Third Money Laundering Directive.
The success of counterterrorism efforts in freezing the assets of terrorists has
diminished over time. The UN found that while $112 million was seized in the three
months after 9/11, only $24 million was seized in the two years that followed.
The continued targeting of al-Qaeda’s financial assets has had the unintended
consequence of transforming al-Qaeda into a loose coalition of localized, autonomous,
and self-sufficient terrorist “franchise” cells. These cells, held together by a world view
rather than by a hierarchical structure, have been enormously effective. The number of
terrorist attacks quadrupled in five years from 208 in 2003 to 864 in 2008.
In terms of financing, al-Qaeda’s shuria or high command council, no longer plays a
central role in allocating expenditures or soliciting funds. Instead, terrorist financing
has moved further into the ‘grey’ economy. Cells raise funds from a combination of
charities, independent criminal ventures, and licit businesses. In fact, crime is now
regarded as the main source of funds for al-Qaeda. Criminal ventures generally include
extortion, hijacking, theft, blackmail, the drug trade, and kidnapping for ransom (KFR).
LIGNET has previously covered al-Qaeda’s use of KFR on the Arabian Peninsula.
Even the transferring of funds between franchise cells has evolved to get around U.S.
counterterrorism strategy. Originally, al-Qaeda moved funds through the financial
sector, using banks such as France’s Credit Lyonnais, Germany’s Commerzbank, and the
Standard Bank of South Africa. However, counterterrorism measures have driven al-
Qaeda’s transferring of funds under ground, forcing it to rely on hawaladars and
couriers. These provide untraceable methods of securely moving funds. Al-Qaeda
recently used Pakistani-based hawaladars to move $1 million from the UAE into
Pakistan, at which point the money was couriered to Afghanistan. Al-Qaeda’s pushing of
its finances into illicit activities and localized funds have made it difficult for
counterterrorism strategies that rely on economic sanctions to be effective. The results
can be seen in Table 1, which shows the trend of cheaper – yet more frequent – terrorist
attacks.
Experts previously believed that the financial war had been a success. This presumption
was based, in large part, on the success the United States had in closing down al-Qaeda’s
traditional source of funding. But al-Qaeda has evolved and adapted. New al-Qaeda
cells, recruiting centers and finance operations have appeared in remote areas of the
world, with key affiliates on the Arabian Peninsula and in North Africa.
Analysis
The measures that have been taken in the war on terror since 9/11 to
intercept al-Qaeda’s funding have seen diminishing returns. And while
financial sanctions certainly weakened al-Qaeda’s ability to launch attacks,
at least for a few years, they undercut the ability of intelligence agencies to
“follow the money.” The importance of money trails is highlighted by the
fact that al-Qaeda spends around 10 percent of its income on operational
costs: The other 90 percent goes toward maintaining an international
network of cells.
A “follow the money” counterterrorism strategy can use several types of
financial transactions to spot emerging al-Qaeda franchise cells.
Transactions can connect a known part of the terrorist network with an
unknown part. Financial movements are frequently a component of attack
preparations, and changes in the predominant patterns of transactions
within a terrorist network may indicate a new set of targets. The al-Qaeda
Strasbourg plot in France is a classic example of this.
A recent analysis of the European al-Qaeda network shows that the Ben
Khemais cell in Milan stole credit cards for use by the Meliani terrorist cell
in Frankfurt. Generally, when a small matrix of cells results in a one-way
flow of money, it is an indication of which cell is planning an operation.
This turned out to be true, as the Meliani terrorist cell was planning an
attack on the Strasbourg market and cathedral. Furthermore, the Meliani
terrorist cell requested additional funding from the al-Qaeda operative Abu
Doha in Britain. By German and British surveillance tracing the various
movements of funds rather than freezing them, al-Qaeda cells in Europe
were uncovered and the attack was prevented.
An approach that combines asset freezing with following the money would
allow the U.S government to build up a broader picture of al-Qaeda’s
networks, permit observations, and prevent franchise cells from obtaining
the funds for particular projects beyond trivial amounts.
Conclusion
Counterterrorism efforts that target the financing of terrorism are a work
in process. The measures employed by the United States and others in the
last 12 years have reshaped rather than resolved the terrorist threat. It
remains to be seen if the United States will be able to in turn adapt to al-
Qaeda’s new and alarming franchise cell structure and finance methods.
Read more: http://www.lignet.com/ArticleAnalysis/With-New-Ways-to-Fund-Attacks-Al-Qaeda-Now-a-Bigge#ixzz2YnTy00iV
All Rights Reserved LIGNET.com

More Related Content

Similar to LIGNET-al-Qaeda finance

The 3rd Directive in the UK
The 3rd Directive in the UKThe 3rd Directive in the UK
The 3rd Directive in the UK
ALI RAZA
 
ISIL Kidnappings and Killings
ISIL Kidnappings and KillingsISIL Kidnappings and Killings
ISIL Kidnappings and Killings
Alec Trout
 
Money laundering concept significance and its impact
Money laundering concept significance and its impactMoney laundering concept significance and its impact
Money laundering concept significance and its impact
Alexander Decker
 
11.money laundering concept significance and its impact
11.money laundering concept significance and its impact11.money laundering concept significance and its impact
11.money laundering concept significance and its impact
Alexander Decker
 
Money laundering
Money launderingMoney laundering
Money laundering
saadiakh
 
BEHIND CLOSED DOORS: THE SECRET WORLD OF MONEY LAUNDERING
BEHIND CLOSED DOORS: THE SECRET WORLD OF MONEY  LAUNDERINGBEHIND CLOSED DOORS: THE SECRET WORLD OF MONEY  LAUNDERING
BEHIND CLOSED DOORS: THE SECRET WORLD OF MONEY LAUNDERING
Md Arman
 
The Al-Kuwari Clan: The Shadow Architects of Global Instability
The Al-Kuwari Clan: The Shadow Architects of Global InstabilityThe Al-Kuwari Clan: The Shadow Architects of Global Instability
The Al-Kuwari Clan: The Shadow Architects of Global Instability
jmounier400
 

Similar to LIGNET-al-Qaeda finance (20)

The 3rd Directive in the UK
The 3rd Directive in the UKThe 3rd Directive in the UK
The 3rd Directive in the UK
 
Money laundering
Money launderingMoney laundering
Money laundering
 
ISIL Kidnappings and Killings
ISIL Kidnappings and KillingsISIL Kidnappings and Killings
ISIL Kidnappings and Killings
 
Osamas_Legacy.ppt
Osamas_Legacy.pptOsamas_Legacy.ppt
Osamas_Legacy.ppt
 
Does Crypto Finance Terrorism?
Does Crypto Finance Terrorism?Does Crypto Finance Terrorism?
Does Crypto Finance Terrorism?
 
1040 2412-1-sm
1040 2412-1-sm1040 2412-1-sm
1040 2412-1-sm
 
Money laundering concept significance and its impact
Money laundering concept significance and its impactMoney laundering concept significance and its impact
Money laundering concept significance and its impact
 
11.money laundering concept significance and its impact
11.money laundering concept significance and its impact11.money laundering concept significance and its impact
11.money laundering concept significance and its impact
 
F0312010140044
F0312010140044F0312010140044
F0312010140044
 
Grey listing anti money laundering issues in uae.pptx 2
Grey listing anti money laundering issues in uae.pptx 2Grey listing anti money laundering issues in uae.pptx 2
Grey listing anti money laundering issues in uae.pptx 2
 
Money laundering and gaming v1
Money laundering and gaming   v1Money laundering and gaming   v1
Money laundering and gaming v1
 
An appraisal of legal and administrative framework for combating terrorist fi...
An appraisal of legal and administrative framework for combating terrorist fi...An appraisal of legal and administrative framework for combating terrorist fi...
An appraisal of legal and administrative framework for combating terrorist fi...
 
Rand's Brian Michael Jenkins on Cyber Terrorism and Silicon Valley
Rand's Brian Michael Jenkins on Cyber Terrorism and Silicon ValleyRand's Brian Michael Jenkins on Cyber Terrorism and Silicon Valley
Rand's Brian Michael Jenkins on Cyber Terrorism and Silicon Valley
 
Money laundering
Money launderingMoney laundering
Money laundering
 
BEHIND CLOSED DOORS: THE SECRET WORLD OF MONEY LAUNDERING
BEHIND CLOSED DOORS: THE SECRET WORLD OF MONEY  LAUNDERINGBEHIND CLOSED DOORS: THE SECRET WORLD OF MONEY  LAUNDERING
BEHIND CLOSED DOORS: THE SECRET WORLD OF MONEY LAUNDERING
 
The Al-Kuwari Clan: The Shadow Architects of Global Instability
The Al-Kuwari Clan: The Shadow Architects of Global InstabilityThe Al-Kuwari Clan: The Shadow Architects of Global Instability
The Al-Kuwari Clan: The Shadow Architects of Global Instability
 
The Al-Kuwari Legacy: Crafting Global Discord
The Al-Kuwari Legacy: Crafting Global DiscordThe Al-Kuwari Legacy: Crafting Global Discord
The Al-Kuwari Legacy: Crafting Global Discord
 
AML Compliance What You Should Know - Lucinity.pdf
AML Compliance What You Should Know - Lucinity.pdfAML Compliance What You Should Know - Lucinity.pdf
AML Compliance What You Should Know - Lucinity.pdf
 
THE LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS FOR COMBATTING MONEY LAUNDERING IN CAM...
THE LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS FOR COMBATTING MONEY LAUNDERING IN CAM...THE LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS FOR COMBATTING MONEY LAUNDERING IN CAM...
THE LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS FOR COMBATTING MONEY LAUNDERING IN CAM...
 
Aml basics
Aml basicsAml basics
Aml basics
 

LIGNET-al-Qaeda finance

  • 1. An Afghan security official is surrounded by the shadows of colleagues as he keeps watch at the scene of an attack on a Red Cross office in Jalalabad on May 29, 2013. (Noorullah Shirzada/AFP/Getty Images) With New Ways to Fund Attacks, Al-Qaeda Now a Bigger Threat June 18, 2013 | Security Summary The overreliance by the United States on sanctions and surveillance in the war on terror has allowed al-Qaeda to adapt its methods of financing to avoid detection, and resulted in a decentralized al-Qaeda structure -- and a much greater threat. Al-Qaeda has transitioned from a hierarchical cell structure to a franchise organization that is now responsible for four times as many terrorist attacks a year as it was before
  • 2. 9/11. Al-Qaeda training camps are now being established on the Arabian Peninsula, in Africa, countries of the former Soviet Union, and Southeast Asia. Background The current counterterrorism strategy is to rely on economic sanctions and financial surveillance to identify and then stop terrorist financing. Examples of this are the U.S. PATRIOT Act, UN Resolution 1617, and the EU’s Third Money Laundering Directive. The success of counterterrorism efforts in freezing the assets of terrorists has diminished over time. The UN found that while $112 million was seized in the three months after 9/11, only $24 million was seized in the two years that followed. The continued targeting of al-Qaeda’s financial assets has had the unintended consequence of transforming al-Qaeda into a loose coalition of localized, autonomous, and self-sufficient terrorist “franchise” cells. These cells, held together by a world view rather than by a hierarchical structure, have been enormously effective. The number of terrorist attacks quadrupled in five years from 208 in 2003 to 864 in 2008. In terms of financing, al-Qaeda’s shuria or high command council, no longer plays a central role in allocating expenditures or soliciting funds. Instead, terrorist financing has moved further into the ‘grey’ economy. Cells raise funds from a combination of charities, independent criminal ventures, and licit businesses. In fact, crime is now regarded as the main source of funds for al-Qaeda. Criminal ventures generally include extortion, hijacking, theft, blackmail, the drug trade, and kidnapping for ransom (KFR). LIGNET has previously covered al-Qaeda’s use of KFR on the Arabian Peninsula. Even the transferring of funds between franchise cells has evolved to get around U.S. counterterrorism strategy. Originally, al-Qaeda moved funds through the financial sector, using banks such as France’s Credit Lyonnais, Germany’s Commerzbank, and the Standard Bank of South Africa. However, counterterrorism measures have driven al- Qaeda’s transferring of funds under ground, forcing it to rely on hawaladars and couriers. These provide untraceable methods of securely moving funds. Al-Qaeda recently used Pakistani-based hawaladars to move $1 million from the UAE into Pakistan, at which point the money was couriered to Afghanistan. Al-Qaeda’s pushing of its finances into illicit activities and localized funds have made it difficult for counterterrorism strategies that rely on economic sanctions to be effective. The results can be seen in Table 1, which shows the trend of cheaper – yet more frequent – terrorist attacks.
  • 3. Experts previously believed that the financial war had been a success. This presumption was based, in large part, on the success the United States had in closing down al-Qaeda’s traditional source of funding. But al-Qaeda has evolved and adapted. New al-Qaeda cells, recruiting centers and finance operations have appeared in remote areas of the world, with key affiliates on the Arabian Peninsula and in North Africa. Analysis The measures that have been taken in the war on terror since 9/11 to intercept al-Qaeda’s funding have seen diminishing returns. And while financial sanctions certainly weakened al-Qaeda’s ability to launch attacks, at least for a few years, they undercut the ability of intelligence agencies to “follow the money.” The importance of money trails is highlighted by the fact that al-Qaeda spends around 10 percent of its income on operational costs: The other 90 percent goes toward maintaining an international network of cells. A “follow the money” counterterrorism strategy can use several types of financial transactions to spot emerging al-Qaeda franchise cells. Transactions can connect a known part of the terrorist network with an unknown part. Financial movements are frequently a component of attack preparations, and changes in the predominant patterns of transactions within a terrorist network may indicate a new set of targets. The al-Qaeda Strasbourg plot in France is a classic example of this. A recent analysis of the European al-Qaeda network shows that the Ben Khemais cell in Milan stole credit cards for use by the Meliani terrorist cell in Frankfurt. Generally, when a small matrix of cells results in a one-way flow of money, it is an indication of which cell is planning an operation. This turned out to be true, as the Meliani terrorist cell was planning an attack on the Strasbourg market and cathedral. Furthermore, the Meliani terrorist cell requested additional funding from the al-Qaeda operative Abu Doha in Britain. By German and British surveillance tracing the various movements of funds rather than freezing them, al-Qaeda cells in Europe were uncovered and the attack was prevented.
  • 4. An approach that combines asset freezing with following the money would allow the U.S government to build up a broader picture of al-Qaeda’s networks, permit observations, and prevent franchise cells from obtaining the funds for particular projects beyond trivial amounts. Conclusion Counterterrorism efforts that target the financing of terrorism are a work in process. The measures employed by the United States and others in the last 12 years have reshaped rather than resolved the terrorist threat. It remains to be seen if the United States will be able to in turn adapt to al- Qaeda’s new and alarming franchise cell structure and finance methods. Read more: http://www.lignet.com/ArticleAnalysis/With-New-Ways-to-Fund-Attacks-Al-Qaeda-Now-a-Bigge#ixzz2YnTy00iV All Rights Reserved LIGNET.com