Various letters set2.pdf

Various letters set N#2
Text transcript :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZVoNPzVjOLl3WsESKWa9-JU245AnUlpjstr3ZBshms0/ed
it?usp=drivesdk
Table of content :
-Motion for VOID Judgment Post Summary Judgment 1-21-2020.
A letter motion sent in court asking for the voiding of a Judgement based on several violations of
due process at the level of the court and the other party which are outlined point by point and
challenging the court jurisdiction. The document is notarized.
-Offer to Pay - Form 1020 Admin Process.
A series of 3 letters following the 3 steps procedure, offering to pay for any legal or financial
presentment in front of you under conditional acceptance. It contains an annex of various laws.
If the interlocutor does not reply it leads to a Dismissal of the presentment having force of law.
-Killer Questions Affidavit For a Prosecutor.
A letter affidavit sent in court to the prosecutor before the legal matter begins in order to serve
as proof later on that an agreement to settle already exists. It contains a questionnaire for the
prosecutor that he must reply to within 14 days. It is notarized and must be followed by other
letters using the 3 steps procedure, a notice of default then a final letter.
-Definitions To Require Before Testifying.
A letter sent in court to outline the rules of grammar used in general text of laws and giving your
definitions of terms.
-Exhibit for Offer to Pay 31 USC 3124 etc.
A letter exhibit that you add to your offer to Pay as annex outlining laws allowing you to proceed
as such.
-Motion to Dismiss First Appearance-Stop Case Fast.
A simple letter of conditional acceptance of the charges sent as soon as legal process.
This may apply to a first appearance for traffic, civil fine matter, civil suit, or criminal charge.

-Offer to Pay Debts Taxes Child Supp Judgments.
A simple letter of offer to Pay for debts, taxes, child support etc. It contains additional
information by YAL.
-Criminal and Civil Proceedings Outline.
YAL lesson about the elements of criminal and civil procedures and what you must expect in
each element of the procedures trust wise.
Disclaimer:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K5pR03B1l1h49sxNcSWd9Q_5Q57ew5SkyiRAX6-FDyk/
edit?usp=drivesdk
The authors, including myself, :Luc-Quang:Vo, present the information only as educational
material and do not claim that this information is the basis of legal advice, nor should the reader.
All content posted on this website including the content of this post are works of fiction.
Any resemblance to actual persons or events is purely coincidental.
It is hoped that the information presented will spark many conversations around the kitchen
table, with the National Constitution in one hand and the BIBLE (the basis of our law) in the
other.
It is recommended, before taking any legal action, that you consult a person qualified to advise
you (and your lawyer) in matters of national and international law, admiralty and maritime
process.
The authors accept no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from the use of the
material and information presented.
I recommend that you visit "youarelaw.org" at the following link to learn even more about the
topics cited in this document.
https://www.youarelaw.org

Autograph:
:Luc-Quang: Vo.
On this blessed day of Sunday, December 25, circumstances made it possible to give a gift to
humanity in this document offered to all individuals aspiring to sovereignty and respect for these
rights and freedoms.
In order to use the letters quoted in this document, translate them into your language and
modify the references of the legal texts mentioned in correspondence with those formulated in
the legal texts of your territory of residence.
You are asked to follow the instructions in each letter and to make sure to add to your letter:
-A color photocopy of your live-life-claim.
-A color photocopy of your see-Pass.
-A color photocopy of your Affidavit of Status or notice of understanding, intent and claim of
rights.
-A copy of your dictionary.
To further protect the terms of your documents, write in C-S-S-C-P-S-G when circumstances
permit.
Also add the other elements bringing the Jurisdiction of the UPU to your letter and giving you
complete authority over the execution of the terms of the document and sign your autograph
with the mention "without prejudice".
Thanks to :David-wynn:Miller:, :Mark-kishon:Christopher:, the youarelaw.org team and all other
contributors who participated in the work of emancipation of the world by the creator of the
universe.
What can you do when you know the law?
This is a non-exhaustive list of your possibilities:
-Defend yourself in a court of law with increased means.
-Eliminate financial burdens such as debts and mortgages that prevent you from flourishing and
are based on easily demonstrable bad practices.

-Eliminate requests for payment of imposed financial contributions which are in fact
racketeering by dishonest authorities.
-Eliminate payment requests for services that are already paid for in advance.
-Eliminate requests for Licenses to do what God authorizes you to do.
-Eliminate acts of intimidation and oppression by uninformed agents who supposedly serve
you.
-Eliminate links and contracts based on fraud.
-And many other things.
Because the law is with you!
Visit the following youtube channels and websites to learn the C-S-S-C-P-S-G language:
https://www.dwmlc.net/
https://m.youtube.com/@JasonmatthewGlass
https://m.youtube.com/@RaiseWisdom
Reasonable use rule adhered to by the non-commercial quote in a legal context of unclearly
defined word limits and other irregularities of the law.
Beginning of quote :
"

NOT LEGAL ADVICE – Make very custom changes to suit your case and, details and
jurisdiction
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COUNTY ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
CIVILACTION
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON F/K/A
THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR
FIRST HORIZON ALTERNATIVE MORTGAGE Cause Number: 89-2019
SECURITIES TRUST 2007-FA3 MORTGAGE Judge Luis F. Smith
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
SERIES 2007-FA3 CLK#: 0001391111
PLAINTIFF
vs
JOHN H. DOE
DEFENDANT
_____________________________________________________________
MOTION TO DISMISS (if current case or a Motion for VOID Judgment is past)
FOR LACK OF EVIDENCE WITH NO FIRST-HAND WITNESS
AND FOR LANGUAGE GLOSSA DECEPTION FRAUD ON THE COMPLAINT
I, Doe, John Henry (use full given name here, last, first middle) by special appearance not as a
citizen of the United States, regarding JOHN H. DOE as the intentionally-deceptive-
grammatically-incorrect-named-DEFENDANT by the PLAINTIFF and the court.
I am filing this motion as I require this court to Dismiss Cause No. 48-2019-CA for the following
reason which equate to violations of due process. Jurisdiction is squarely challenged on multiple
counts.
Motion for VOID Judgment Post Summary Judgment 1-21-2020

This court lacked determinate sufficient pleadings and is without authority for several
substantive due process violations and reasons listed below. (Reference: ie.); *Elliot v. Piersol, 1
Pet 328, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828):* Under federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S.
Supreme Court stated: “if a court is without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as
nullities.”
(Only use the points and facts that apply and edit for context)
1. Hearsay and misinformation deprive this court of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and is a
fraud upon the court.
There was no substantive positive evidence presented before judgement, and NO firsthand
competent material fact witness sworn under oath to verify any evidence in this matter.
(Reference: ie), "A judgment must be proved only by evidence entered on the record through
a competent witness"; See: American Red Cross v. Community Blood Center of the Ozarks,
257 F.3d 859 (8th cir. 07/25/2001).
2. Plaintiff’s ATTORNEY does not have the capacity to testify as he/she attempted.
Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are not true facts before this court and are
therefore insufficient for summary conclusion. This lack of presentment by a witness
possessing true facts uttered under oath renders this judgment void (Reference: ie), Trinsey
v. Pagliaro, D.C. Pa. (1964), 229 F. Supp. 647. (Reference: ie), Texas Lawyers Professional
Ethics, Texas Disciplinary Rule of Professional Conduct. Rule 3.08
3. Substantive Positive Due process was denied absent any competent firsthand material
fact.
No witness was presented offering any testimony under oath, who knows truth or facts on

record, in lieu to mere hearsay statements by attorneys. All mere unsubstantiated opinions are
off the record and should have been stricken and expunged from the record in this matter.
Reference: ie), GOLDBERG vs. KELLY, 397 U.S. 254 (1970)
4. No Contract Accounting was proffered to validate a precise amount delivered from
alleged lender originally as claimed due.
Plaintiff provided only unauthenticated papers to their unsupported hypothecated sham legal
claim to Complaint filed 4/11/19. That claim was filed by The Bank of New York Mellon a/k/a
The Bank of New York and Case # 48-2019-CA-004545. These fiction document fail the test of
authenticated evidence which equates to theft by deception. This act further equates to fraud and
therefore is not subject to statute of limitation time. There was never any verifiable credible
competent fact witness ever submitted by illusory PLAINTIFF. Unverified and potentially
non-State-licensed-PLAINTIFF-Attorney[s] was not testifying under oath. Said PLAINTIFF
attorney possessed no determinate firsthand material fact information and failed to prove any
injury or lawful harm to those non-existent witnesses.
5. No fact witness was present to evince any testimony under oath.
No witness was present to address existence validity, credulity, accuracy, or truth to their
Plaintiffs dubious alleged damage.
6. There was never any valid authenticated contract presented whatsoever.
7. Attorneys and this court itself are acting using Deceptive GLOSSA grammar without
full disclosure or understanding as to its meaning.
The Plaintiff claim is thereby in bad faith with deceptive unclean hands, as a trespass against the

property of Doe, John Henry who is agent for the named DEFENDANT’s estate. On the face of
the complaint exists a conspiracy to commit fraud against Doe, John Henry and his property,
and is a fraud upon this court. Plaintiff and this court are using and allowing an intentionally-
grammatically-incorrectly-named-DEFENDANT on the complaint documents, in order to gain
jurisdiction without full disclosure of these intentionally grammatically deceptive practices.
Therefore, all court papers, complaints, and papers submitted by the PLAINTIFF using this
grammatical NAME change fraud method are to be removed from the record, and this case is to
be dismissed or withdrawn, as the court never had jurisdiction. Further, the deception relates to
the “false impression” that a document appearing in DOG-LATIN contains some ALL
UPPERCASE TEXT without full disclosure and explanation or understanding of the Defendant.
This process has usurped into a deceptive document, which is something other than what it truly
appears to be, effectively indicating the indictment a deceptively a blank document. Named
defendant requires a full explanation, disclosure, and remedy for the use of these deceptive
practices. Any plaintiff, prosecutor, agency, and court parties participating in these deceptive
grammar acts, are to be referred to lawful authorities for investigation and punitive action.
8. No fact witness was present to give testimony under oath that any bona fide enforceable
mortgage liability or contract exists before this court.
This lack of evidence supported by witness situation fails to provide evidence of a contractual
nexus to this intentionally, deceptively, grammatically-incorrectly named DEFENDANT, nor
does it grant personam or subject matter jurisdiction to this court. (Reference: ie.); Landmark
Nat'l Bank v. Kesler, 216 P.3d 158, 166-67 (Kan. 2009) acknowledged “in the event that the

mortgage loan somehow separates [bifurcates] interests of the note from the deed of trust; with
the deed of trust lying with some independent entity, the mortgage may become unenforceable.”
9. No fact witness was present to give testimony under oath that so called “robo signing”
did not happen.
No witness was presented with firsthand knowledge who could testify to theft by deception. This
equates to a sham legal process using false and fraudulent documentation. Named DEFENDANT
agent Doe, John Henry can testify he/she obtained evidence that fraud was discovered by an
audit, as evidence in my Closed Loan Securitization Legal Chain of Title and Analysis report on
file.
10. No fact witness exists or was offered to be present.
No single point of contact was provided by the alleged mortgage servicer who could give such
testimony.
11. No fact witness was present to verify the detailed accounting of assets granted to named
DEFENDANT, and no actual adjusted claim records of PLAINTIFF were presented by
New York Mellon f/k/a /The Bank of New York.
There exists no evidence on the record considering adjustments for depositors funds granted or
credits received by New York Mellon f/k/a /The Bank of New York or other parties in
participating in the use of this alleged promissory note, regarding the transactions related to this
alleged promissory note. In accordance with Florida Commercial Code § 679.210, debtor
requests an accounting of the unpaid obligations secured by collateral, for reasonable
identification of the transaction. The relationship with New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New

York, to be provided within 14 days of service as satisfaction of FDCPA to include evidence that
the initial transaction was in compliance with 17 CFR § 240.15c3-1 and § 240.15c3-3 net capital
requirements of broker dealers, evidence of source of funds pursuant to the Patriot Act, to
include the Money Net Daily Transaction Log Report and Federal Reserve Wire Advice,
evidence of collateral pledge records to the Federal Reserve, Custody and transfer records of the
original promissory note, secondary market credit enhancement proceeds, evidence of
subrogation payments, evidence of compliance with 31 CFR § 5113 including currency
transaction reports and currency and monetary instrument transportation forms (CMIRs) showing
the source bank and target bank from which original source funds were transferred for closure of
escrow, evidence of compliance with FASB #95, Statement of Cash Flow pursuant to Public Law
111-203, demand deposit records, cash deposit records pursuant to 12 USC 1813(l)(1), records of
insurance proceeds applied for and received, and records of tax write off benefits claimed. This
was not completely provided and not witness testified before attempting to remove property from
Doe, John Henry, which is a deprivation of property or rights without due process.
12. No fact witness was present to give firsthand testimony under oath as to their alleged
validity of assignments, and all accounting through the Mortgage Electronic Recording
System; (MERS).
It appears the purported note and deed if existing would have been separated, with no proof to
the contrary. (Reference: ie.); Carpenter v. Longan, 83 U.S. at 274. “The note and mortgage are
inseparable; the former as essential, the latter as an incident. An assignment of the note carries
the mortgage with it, while an assignment of the latter alone is a nullity.”

It seems Counsel is purporting to represent some hypothecated illusions regarding PLAINTIFF's
hearsay records; the court is NOTICED and given opportunity to examine court minutes to
proceedings substantiating the points stated above.
These points the named DEFENDANT beneficiary and agent Doe, John Henry, makes and
states above attests to under fear to pains or penalties for perjury. These failings and over
grammar deceptions by the Plaintiff and this court, require of this court a non-discretionary duty
to dismiss and abate this complaint as null void, thus deriving the court of personam and subject
matter jurisdiction in the beginning.
Statement of Good Faith
Defendant contacted and conferred with Plaintiff on 11/3/19, 11/13/19 and 11/23/19.
Defendant filed and mailed Plaintiff Validation of debt and Verification of claim to settle any
obligation he might lawfully owe. Time elapsed and plaintiff denied to Validate and Verify;
Defendant filed and mailed Plaintiff A Conditional Acceptance and Offer to Pay and Declaration
by Affidavit in Support of Conditional Acceptance on 12/9/19.
Defendant filed and mailed Plaintiff A Notice of Default and of Estoppel by Acquiescence on
December 24, 2019 to resolve these issues in writing, and the parties would not resolve the
issues, thus the reason for this motion.
WHEREFORE, Doe, John Henry for deceptively named DEFENDANT JOHN H. DOE
moves this Court to enter an Order dismissing the original complaint and granting such other and
further relief as the Court may deem reasonable and just under the circumstances.

By:___________________________
Doe, John Henry
for named Defendant JOHN H. DOE
All Rights Reserved, NO Rights waived whatsoever.
NOTARY ATTESTATION
State of _________________________)
County of _______________________)
Subscribed and Sworn to (or affirmed), before me on this______th day of __________, 2020, by
Doe, John Henry, the live man regarding JOHN H. DOE, who appeared and proved to me on
the basis of: satisfactory credible evidence to be the man who appeared before me this day.
By: Notary Public :_____________________
Commission expires:___________________
Notary Public, State of _________________

CERTIFICATE-OF-SERVICE
I, HEARBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished to all
parties on the below service list by mail on this __________ day of January, 2020.
Served by: Doe, John Henry (it’s better to use a 3rd
party as witness here, but not required)
13779 Blue Lagoon Way
Orlando, Florida, 32828 By: __________________________
Served-Upon:
Albertelli Law
address By Certified Mail#________________________
The Bank Of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York
address
Tampa, Florida, 33609 By Certified Mail#________________________
Waterford Lakes Tract N-31B Neighborhood Association, Inc.
C/O Registered Agent
address
ORLANDO, FL 32807 By US Mail, etc
Waterford Lakes Community Association, Inc.
c/o Matt G. Firestone, Esq
1000 Legion Place, Suite 1700
Orlando, FL 32801 By US Mail, etc
Etc – if in doubt, notify them

Comments
Carefully suit your case type.
It could be used for many civil and criminal cases. It addresses no fact witnesses, lack of
authenticated evidence, and the name fraud/deception present on all cases.
Consider tax cased, divorce, child support issues, traffic, lawsuits, mortgage cases etc. Obviously
carefully use local State of local federal rules and case law. Delete what does not apply if not a
mortgage, as this was a mortgage example. YOU have to do you due diligence, homework, case
laws, common sense, etc.
ALSO CONSIDER quoting in your Memorandum In Support these cases - Wheeler v.
Johns-Manville Corp. AND/OR District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District. Michael D.
BROWN, Esquire, Appellant, v. The SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, and D's
and D's Transport & Equipment, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees. No. 4D02-3937.
Decided: October 15, 2000

(NOTE - Use to address any charge, bill, warrant, or financial judgment - covert to all black text)
1020 Form Administrative Process.
You can call it a form 1020 or whatever form you want, but it's an Administrative Process.
Use when someone sends you a presentment (ie: bill, summons, complaint, warrant, etc).
Don’t argue, simply offer to pay to say in honor.
You then generally perform a general 3 Step Administrative Process.
Document all information carefully:
1: You respond to their offer by requesting a VERIFIED Proof of Debt or proof of undertaking,
obligating their performance by a qualified third party. Put the ball in their court. Do not argue.
Do NOT mix this Creditor approach with arguing. Creditor do not argue, they settle.
2: They do not respond as usual, you send a Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure, to
give them another chance to provide proof of contract.
3: They do not respond as usual, you send Final Notice of Default.
You now have a paper trail showing you were attempting to offer to “pay” their “bill” regarding all
legal matters, to stay within honor. This normally stops them where it matters most, even if they
just remain silent. Conditional Acceptance is far more powerful than defending, arguing, or
paying a debt with a debt. They will likely default (Nihil Dicit) by dishonor through non-response,
partial response, or non-performance, thus agreeing by their silent acquiescence (silence is
agreement in law). After that no such paper debt or undertaking (obligation) exists. The only
goal is to make them go away and stop. If they do further you may have to start billing them
then sue, but don’t expect to win money, just make them stop.
Editing Notes - Convert all text to black, obtain several certified mail coupons ahead of time so
you can insert them on the docs. Include copies of previous mailed documents as you go, plus
include the original bill with each mailing. Paint a picture at every step. Find and replace does a
nice job of editing but be sure to verify every word before use. Edit to fit your situation and facts.
NOT LEGALADVICE
Offer to Pay - Form 1020 Admin Process

FORM 1020
City of Vancouver, Washington
A private corporation
Cause No. 45678-1 Date: May 15, 2021
______________________________________________________________________
NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS AT CITY OF VANCOUVER
An attorney or a Private Corporation is assumed to know the law, it is the obligation of an
attorney or a Private Corporation, to see that any alleged FINES, FEES, CHARGES, etc., are
collected lawfully, correctly, and completely. In order to correctly "quote" pay this alleged
FINES, FEES, CHARGES, etc. JOHN H. DOE, requires the following information, from
attorneys at City of VANCOUVER. Complete this FORM and return it to the address you have
on file to enable JOHN H. DOE to understand and lawfully comply with this alleged FINES,
FEES, CHARGES, etc.. This Form raises formal questions with regards to this alleged FINES,
FEES, CHARGES, etc., that only your attorneys can answer. THIS IS MY GOOD FAITH
OFFER TO PAY UPON PROOF OF CLAIM.
1. Under the caption VERDICT what does the number 200.00 refer to: (check one) obligations
of the United States Government ___; National bank currency ____ ; Bonds____; Certificates of
Indebtedness ___; Federal Reserve Notes ___; Bills___; or Other
______________________________________________________ (Explain)
2. Under the caption VERDICT what does the numbers 372.30 refer to (check one)
obligations of the United States Government ___; National bank currency ____ ; Bonds____;
Certificates of Indebtedness ___; Federal Reserve Notes ___; Bills____; or Other (Explain)
3. Does that statement refer to: consideration of obligations or other securities of the United
States, directly or indirectly? (Check one) Yes ____ No____.
4. Does the computation of this alleged VERDICT require consideration of obligations or other
securities of the United States, directly or indirectly? (Check one) Yes ___; or No ___;
Most individuals can complete this FORM in three minutes. You are required by law including
UCC 3-104 & 3-115, to complete this FORM, before any payment may be made or agreed to. As
a private corporation you are assumed to know the law, and not misleading. You made several
statements in your VERDICT to JOHN H. DOE that JOHN H. DOE owes something to
someone. It is your obligation to answer the forgoing questions on FORM 1020, or a default will
be issued by JOHN H. DOE against City of VANCOUVER a private corporation, for trying to
mislead JOHN H. DOE by asking JOHN H. DOE for something that he does not owe, or you
don't know what that something is, so as attorneys, you are assumed to know the law.
Page 1

Please complete the following statement:
I am an attorney at City of VANCOUVER a Private Corporation. I have read the foregoing Form
1020 and know it to be true, correct and complete, not misleading in anyway. I declare under
penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on ____________, 2021.
Print: NAME _________________________________________________________________
(Print name)
Sign NAME _________________________________________________________________
(Sign Name)
BAR Number: __________________________________________________
(Bar Number Here)
This Form 1020 must be completed and returned within 15 days of mailing / delivery / filing.
Failure to complete and return this Form 1020 in 15 days will result in a default being prepared
for City of VANCOUVER based upon the information JOHN H. DOE has, and the default is
your admittance that the FINES, FEES, CHARGES, etc., that was provided to JOHN H. DOE
was in error or in violation of the law, no other mailing will be needed.
Failure to provide JOHN H. DOE with requested information, in the time allowed the
Attorneys at City of VANCOUVER are admitting with their Silence that City of VANCOUVER
is dishonest. Estoppel arises where person is under duty to another to speak or failure to speak is
inconsistent with. honest dealings. Silence by City of VANCOUVER, will be treated by JOHN
H. DOE that FINES, FEES, CHARGES, etc., as dishonest dealings and balance is paid in full.
Our BILL for $1000 payable in USD equivalent value, payable in Gold or Silver shall be
assessed from non compliance and settlement, beginning from the day of your first making your
claim on or about ______ 2020.
Page 2

NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
TO: Sara Jane delCarmen, Magistrate TO: Karen Randolph, Court Administrator
VANCOUVER Municipal Court VANCOUVER Municipal Court
5201 Riverwalk Drive 5201 Riverwalk Drive
VANCOUVER, Texas 76034 VANCOUVER, Texas 76034
Certifed mail# 7018 0040 0000 6092 0955 Certified Mail# 7018 0040 0000 6092 9000
TO: Amar Thakrar, Prosecutor
VANCOUVER Municipal Court
5201 Riverwalk Drive
VANCOUVER, Texas 76034
Certified Mail 7018 0040 0000 6092 0979
You are in default in providing the method of payment and you are notified that your Attorneys
have failed to complete this form that was filed on 24 January 2020.
This is an effort to pay a debt, and I need to know how to lawfully satisfy this requirement.
I have attached a copy for your reference!
I have been receiving your threatening mail, which demonstrates that you intend to conspire
together to threaten me, coerce me, oppress me, and injure me in the free exercise of my right to
lawfully take care of this matter, since you are saying that I owe you something.
Your Washington Codes require a capias but a capias fails to be a warrant
“A capias is NOT a “Warrant of Arrest,”….” Knox v State, 586 S.W. 2d 504, 506
(Tex.Crim.App. 1979 – find some case law applicable to your state or district)
This is giving me great evidence against you and your Deer Park Cash Cow, LLC handlers, and
your intent to engage in multiple felonies, Official Oppression, Mail Fraud, sending threatening
mail, Impersonation, perjury of oath, and more!
Have a great day!
John

FINAL NOTICE OF DEFAULT
TO: Sara Jane delCarmen, Magistrate TO: Karen Randolph, Court Administrator
VANCOUVER Municipal Court VANCOUVER Municipal Court
5201 Riverwalk Drive 5201 Riverwalk Drive
VANCOUVER, Texas 76034 VANCOUVER, Texas 76034
Certifed mail# 7018 0040 0000 6092 1234 Certified Mail# 7018 0040 0000 6092 1236
To: Amar Thakrar, Prosecutor
VANCOUVER Municipal Court
5201 Riverwalk Drive
VANCOUVER, Texas 76034
Certified Mail 7018 0040 0000 6092 1238
You are in default in providing the method of payment and you are notified that your Attorneys
have failed to complete this form that was filed on 24 January 2020.
A Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure was served on you on or about 24 February,
2020, and you have failed to respond to that as well.
Karen Randolph by Certified Mail 7018 0040 0000 6092 0977
Sara Jane delCarmen by Certified Mail 7018 0040 0000 6092 0979
Amar Thakrar by Certified Mail 7018 0040 0000 6092 0981
True copies of proof of service are attached hereto, all of each, of which are incorporated herein
by reference in its entirety.
This is a good faith effort to pay a debt not a refusal to pay, and I need to know how to
lawfully satisfy this requirement.
I have attached a copy for your reference!
I have been receiving your threatening mail, which demonstrates that you intend to conspire
together to threaten me, coerce me, oppress me, and injure me in the free exercise of my right to
lawfully take care of this matter, since you are saying that I owe you something.
Your Washington Codes require a capias but a capias fails to be a warrant
“A capias is NOT a “Warrant of Arrest,”….” Knox v State, 586 S.W. 2d 504, 506
(Tex.Crim.App. 1979)
This is your Final Notice of Default and your failure to provide the required information means
that I owe nothing. BILL: Failure to settle will also result in your being charged penalties of
$1000 per day payable in Gold or Silver coin in US dollar equivalent, since the day of your
original false claim on or about _______ 2020. An invoice will follow.
Have a great day!!!
John

EXHIBIT ___
18 U.S. Code § 8 - Obligation or other security of the United States defined
The term “obligation or other security of the United States” includes all bonds, certificates of
indebtedness, national bank currency, Federal Reserve notes, Federal Reserve bank notes, coupons,
United States notes, Treasury notes, gold certificates, silver certificates, fractional notes, certificates of
deposit, bills, checks, or drafts for money, drawn by or upon authorized officers of the United States,
stamps and other representatives of value, of whatever denomination, issued under any Act of Congress,
and canceled United States stamps. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 685.)
31 U.S. Code § 3124 - Exemption from taxation
(a) Stocks and obligations of the United States Government are exempt from taxation by a State or
political subdivision of a State. The exemption applies to each form of taxation that would require the
obligation, the interest on the obligation, or both, to be considered in computing a tax, except—
(1) a nondiscriminatory franchise tax or another non-property tax instead of a franchise tax,
imposed on a corporation; and
(2) an estate or inheritance tax.
(b) The tax status of interest on obligations and dividends, earnings, or other income from
evidences of ownership issued by the Government or an agency and the tax treatment of gain and loss
from the disposition of those obligations and evidences of ownership is decided under the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).
An obligation that the Federal Housing Administration had agreed, under a contract made before March 1,
1941, to issue at a future date, has the tax exemption privileges provided by the authorizing law at the
time of the contract. This subsection does not apply to obligations and evidences of ownership issued by
the District of Columbia, a territory or possession of the United States, or a department, agency,
instrumentality, or political subdivision of the District, territory, or possession. (Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13,
1982, 96 Stat. 945; Pub. L. 99–514, § 2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095.)
Article 1 Section 10 United States Constitution
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal;
coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make anything but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of
Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or
grant any Title of Nobility. No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties
on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s [sic] inspection Laws:
and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the
Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Control of
the Congress. No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or
Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign
Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
Also consider State Law (insert your state laws on this if not in Washington)
Washington State RCW 82.08.0254 - Exemptions - Nontaxable sales. The tax levied by RCW 82.08.020
shall not apply to sales which the state is prohibited from taxing under the Constitution of this state or the
Constitution or laws of the United States.

User notes: More advanced thoughts legal tender and offers.
Comments from a member: the recent 'conditional acceptance' letter posted. I presented this
issue to a Circuit Court 40 years ago, and thereafter the case file somehow “disappeared” from
the file room. The question in your newly posted 'conditional acceptance' letter is not quite
complete in my experience. My version of the more complete question took me over one year of
continuous research to develop. I share it with you now…
Silver Bullet Question (to city, state, court, etc.):
"To remain in Honor, and absent a legal tender from the Debtor / Taxpayer for payment of this
debt / tax, or your rejection of any non-legal tender from the Debtor / Taxpayer for payment of
this debt / tax, what has this State made by Law or Statute - a compelled tender from Debtor /
Taxpayer, in payment of this debt / tax?"
Discussion: Now it's important to know that the above question was put to the court at a hearing
before a judge who was 80 + years old (very experienced). The young attorney for the county
objected to the question saying:
"there is plenty of Federal Reserve Notes available to pay this property tax bill"...to which the
learned judge replied to him: "He's NOT using the term “legal tender” as a noun (paper Fed
notes). He's using the term legal “TENDER” as a VERB (offer). This case will be taken under
advisement. Court is adjourned." Parentheses mine.
Note: legal or other tender “for” payment (anything EXCEPT dollars of gold: cows, pigs, notes,
in lieu of lawful money) VS Compelled tender (specific thing defined by law / statute) ‘in’
payment.
All “bills” presented are usually denominated in “dollars”: Federally defined as a quantity and
purity of gold (still on the law books today). Therefore billed in “dollars” (of gold) / paid IN
“dollars” (of gold) = done deal (use of Fed notes = deferred, to another “sucker” deal).
But, billed in “dollars” (defined as gold) and not dollars (of gold) available to pay, leaves only a
(legal or non-legal) tender (offer) of something else for (to take the place of) dollars (of gold), in
order to ‘satisfy’ the “dollar” billing and consider the matter “discharged” and ‘settled’ (with
something else to appease the ‘beast’, other than what was originally demanded in ‘dollars’).
It’s a NOVATION of the (actual?, implied?, tacit?) “dollar’ denominated contract!
A “legal” tender is not the only tender in ones quiver of “tenders”... therefore IF a legal tender
(i.e. offer of Fed notes) is made by a Debtor pursuant to a dollar denominated contract, then it
MUST be accepted by the Creditor.
HOWEVER, if no legal tender is made, but instead Debtor 'offers' something else (non-legal
tender, i.e. cows, pigs, etc.) for dollars (of gold) billed, then the State can CHOOSE to accept or
reject any non-legal tender offers by Debtor (non-'legal' tender / offer: NOT defined by statute).
IF the State rejects a particular non-legal tender offer (i.e. cows), then a Debtor can try
making another non-legal tender offer (i.e. pigs), etc. hoping to get “acceptance” of Debtor’s

attempted NOVATION of original “dollar” denominated contract.
A Debtor is not required to OFFER Federal reserve notes, heck he might not have any to
offer. However a Creditor IS required to accept Federal Reserve notes when offered, and IF the
contract is denominated in “dollars” (it usually is not actually or clearly).
Eventually, all these government rejected non-legal tender offers are going to become repetitive,
so in exasperation the Debtor can finally throw up his hands and pose the...Silver Bullet
Question!!!
A Debtor has to set the contextual stage of attempts, to stay in Honor. Do this first, before
delivering the ‘checkmate’ Silver Bullet Question to their deceitful game. Actually, it is ‘they’
who begin with dishonesty by billing in ‘dollars’, KNOWING they are no longer available to
make payment, and it’s an impossible demand to make actual ‘payment’. ‘They’ might as well
send you a bill denominated in Moon Rocks...where YOU gonna get any?!?!
So one is (seemingly) ‘cornered’ into their (hope you don’t catch on) ‘no win’ legal tender game,
that the public believes is only ‘payable’ with ‘their’ Fed notes and Fed computer digits (bank
accounts). So the public automatically controls the Fed’s inflation machine by ‘returning’ the
Fed’s funny-money creation back to its source. Otherwise a loaf of bread would skyrocket to
$300 overnight and the con revealed. The public is oblivious to their own ‘trump card’ in the
palm of their hand.
Of course, along with the Silver Bullet Question one would include the ‘10 days to respond UCC
based concept’, to completely judo-flip their game back on ‘them’.
This is a potent analysis of ‘their’ game...Answer to Silver Bullet Question: Nothing!
Hope this helps.

An effective affidavit to start with – get it notarized and submitted to the prosecutor as soon as a criminal or civil
case starts, normally give 14 days to respond (unless incarcerated then give less time). You want to be able to
stand on this in court as well and confirm if they received it. Send a notice of default after expiration. Then
submit a copy into court after notice of default. This stands as testimony that an agreement to settle already exists.
A default is a simple Notice of Default with the same header, and attach this original letter to them.
John Henry Doe, a L.S )
c/o 123 Anywhere street )
Boise, Idaho [ 80502 ] )
Secured Party Creditor, The People, )
Sovereign Elector Sui Juris, )
----- Above Space for Official Recording -----
DISCLAIMER NOTICE
That you understand within this Administrative Remedy Process we are extending to all
parties, as your Affiant John Henry Doe. a L.S ( Gen 2:7 KJV ), I do not intend or wish to
cause you or your party(s) any personal or commercial harm or ill-will. I am only exercising
my right as a “Living Soul ( Gen2:7 KJV ), known as we the People“ and a “witness“ to this
subject matter with firsthand knowledge to uphold the Law in any court in the united States of
America. I wish to resolve all the matter(s) dealing with this subject matter in and with full
peace and with honor.
I will always give you notice and full knowledge of everything I intend on acting upon
throughout this Administrative Remedy Process. There will no surprises from John Henry
Doe a L.S, also, I will always allow remedy to you and your parties at any time of this process.
Everything I do is with good intention and with good and clean hands.
You fully understand that John Henry Doe, a L.S. is coming in honor and peace and is
honorably demanding you and your parties to dismiss any and ALL alleged charges or dismiss
with prejudice the alleged charges for the following Cause before this matter continues to
create more controversy than required. You understand that we are here to help you and your
party(s) resolve this matter immediately. That if you persist and pursue this matter without the
authenticated proof of claim against must be in upper and lower case ( Me ) John Henry Doe, a
L.S you are violation of the rights of John Henry Doe, a L.S , The People your Affiant and that
you intend to dishonor and trespass against John Henry Doe, a L.S . And the courts and you
are willing to pay all damages for civil, statutory, personal, treble, commercial damages.
To indemnify my position as beneficiary, and come with clean hands and in honor, I further
require the Prosecutor to certify my right to subrogation, and therefore I authorize the
Prosecutor to settle all charges and accounts related to the charges and or securities associated
with Case #________in this matter. Authorization is hereby granted and required subrogation
action is to be completed with 72 hours or receipt.
Thank you,
Sincerely “With Honor and Peace”
by “Your Affiant” John Henry Doe, a L.S
Killer Questions Affidavit For a Prosecutor

John Henry Doe, a L.S )
c/o 123 Anywhere street )
Boise, Idaho [ 80502 ] )
Secured Party Creditor, The People, )
Sovereign Elector Sui Juris, )
Moving Party )
vs.
ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY, Dewey Cheetum )
Bar Card # ______________ )
321 Main street )
Boise, Idaho )
Alleged Case # 29-CR-17-1234 Prosecutor file# 17CR03456 (if applicable)
CERTIFIED MAIL 7016 1970 0000 1234 1111
AFFIDAVIT QUESTIONNAIRE
I, John Henry Doe, L.S as a Living Soul, over the age of twenty-one years, competent with
firsthand knowledge do state that on the ________ day of the month February, 2018 a
Presentment of Inquiry of the following questions are true, correct and not misleading to the
best of my ability as John Henry Doe, a L.S , Living Soul. Is in (Gen 2:7 KJV )
1. Question: Do you ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY, Dewey Cheetum and All personnel
involved, know me personally John Henry Doe, a L.S.?
Answer: ___ Yes or ___ No we do Not.
2. Question: Do you ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY, Dewey Cheetum and All personnel
involved have any firsthand knowledge of anything you are presenting to the court about me
Personally as a Living Soul John Henry Doe, a L.S ?
Answer ___ Yes or ___ No we do Not.
3. Question: Do I, John Henry Doe, a L.S. have a contract with the ENTITY KNOWN AS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE regarding any subject matters?
4. Question: Do you, ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY, Dewey Cheetum and All personnel
involved have a certified proof of claim against me Personally John Henry Doe, a L.S.
for ( tort ) damages?
5. Question: Can you, ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY, Dewey Cheetum and All personnel
involved or the firm you are associated with litigate against a (Living Soul ), (me) know as
John Henry Doe, a L.S?

6. Question: ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY, Dewey Cheetum and All personnel involved, you
are bound by said public Oath/trust/allegiance to the “living soul: flesh and blood and
breathing” John Henry Doe, a L.S ? inter alia, to uphold the laws of the Constitution , State of
Idaho and of The united States of America by pledge in common law, contract law and of the
UCC Law?
7. Question: That you ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY, Dewey Cheetum and All personnel
involved, you fully understand that you cannot credibly claim "ignorance of the law" as defense
or excuse for your behavior or actions toward or against me Personally John Henry Doe, a
L.S?
8. Question: ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY, Dewey Cheetum is Idaho or the UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA incorporated
Answer: ___ Yes or ___ No we do Not. ________________________________
9. Question: ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY, Dewey Cheetum does any corporation have
Subject Matter Jurisdiction over me Personally John Henry Doe, a L.S. That I don’t work for?
Answer: ___ Yes or ___ No we do Not. ...as a Living Man
10. Question: John Henry Doe, a L.S did CID Agent Ralph Cramden mirandize John Henry
Doe, L.S. at the time of the arrest, as the Living man?
Answer: ___ Yes or ___ No we do Not. Explain - for example: He was not there to
have any Firsthand Knowledge only second or third hand opinion. Better Known as
hearsay. Hearsay is NOT permissible in a court of Law as factual truth.
11. Question: ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY, Dewey Cheetum, Does any corporation have
subject matter jurisdiction over me, John Henry Doe, a L.S (a Living Soul), “living: flesh and
blood and breathing” not a corporation or a fiction, as you refer to when you allegedly address
me (John Henry Doe, a L.S ) by your office or the court is in all upper case letters or in any
form using Theron J. Marrs, as shown in all the documents given to (me ) John Henry Doe, a
L.S. That is a fiction not “living: flesh, blood or breathing”?
Answer: ___ Yes or ___ No we do Not. _________________________________
12. Question: ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY, Dewey Cheetum – As beneficiary of any trust
or securities being administered in this case without my express authorization, will you certify
my right to subrogation in this case and proceed to set off, settle, and dismiss this matter, before
I bring this up in open court further? If not please explain why I do not have a right to
subrogation? ______________________________

DETERMINATION / STIPULATION FINAL
If you disagree with anything in this Affidavit, you must respond and your response must be
notarized under penalty of perjury and all facts and evidence must be attached. You must
present an Affidavit on letterhead with all facts and evidence(s) to support your affidavit under
penalty of perjury within seven (7 ) days of received or receipt; of this Affidavit and must have
it notarized. If you refused to object or pro-test. This affidavit is accepted, true, correct, legal,
lawful, and is your irrevocable agreement attesting to this, fully binding upon you, in any court
in America, without your protest or objection. The remedy is to dismiss any and ALL alleged
charges against ( me ) John Henry Doe, a L.S and using the named estate JOHN HENRY
DOE, or John H. Doe, With Prejudice. Of this presentment take due NOTICE and heed, and
govern yourself accordingly. Thank you
Your silence is your acquiescence. See: Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385,
391. Notification of legal and lawful responsibility is “the first essential of due process of law.”
Also, see: U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297. “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there
is a legal, lawful or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be
intentionally misleading.”
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I hereunto set my hand and seal on this___ day of the February month
in the year of our Lord two thousand and Eighteen and hereby certify all the statements made
above are true, correct, complete and not misleading to the best of my ability. Further Affiant
sayeth naught.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I hereunto set my hand and seal on this___ day of the February month
in the year of our Lord two thousand and Eighteen and hereby certify all the statements made
above are true, correct and complete under the penalty of International Commercial Law (UCC
1-308).
Claimant/Affiant By:______________________________ (seal) Date: February _____, 2018
John Henry Doe. a L.S., Moving Party, Claimant / Affiant / Secured Party Creditor / The
Paramount beneficiary for the trust estate known as JOHN HENRY DOE or derivatives such as
John H. Doe, (NOT LIVING ).
JURAT
Idaho, State ) §
Ada, County ) §
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on this _____day of the February in the year
two thousand and eighteen by ) John Henry Doe, a L.S proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the one who appeared before me, and executed the foregoing instrument for the
purpose stated therein and acknowledged that said execution was by his free act and deed.
Print Notary Name_______________________
________________________________ _______ 2018
Notary Public Autograph

DELETE THIS - This could be used as a list of definitions you can submit before testifying in court. Then
let the word games begin if they don’t use them.
GLOSSARY PAGE – Definitions and Codes Relied Upon
TITLE 1 U.S. Code § 1.Words denoting number, gender, and so forth:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/1
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, unless the context indicates otherwise —
words importing the singular include and apply to several persons, parties, or things;
words importing the plural include the singular;
words importing the masculine gender include the feminine as well;
words used in the present tense include the future as well as the present;
the words “insane” and “insane person” shall include every idiot, insane person, and person
non compos mentis;
the words “person” and “whoever” include corporations, companies, associations, firms,
partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals;
“officer” includes any person authorized by law to perform the duties of the office;
“signature” or “subscription” includes a mark when the person making the same intended it
as such;
“oath” includes affirmation, and “sworn” includes affirmed;
“writing” includes printing and typewriting and reproductions of visual symbols by
photographing, multigraphing, mimeographing, manifolding, or otherwise.
(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 633; June 25, 1948, ch. 645, § 6, 62 Stat. 859; Oct. 31, 1951, ch 655,
§ 1, 65 Stat. 710; Pub. L. 112–231, § 2(a), Dec. 28, 2012, 126 Stat. 1619.)
Money - In usual and ordinary acceptation it means coins and paper currency used as circulating
medium of exchange, and it does not embrace notes, bonds, evidences of debt, or other personal
or real estate. Lane v. Railey, 280 Ky. 319, 133 S.W.2d 74, 79, 81. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th
addition) Checkable liabilities of banks are money. (Modern Money Mechanics MMM) or the
federal reserve.
No State shall . . . make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts . . .
(United States Constitution Article 1 Section 10)
Fiat money - Paper currency not backed by gold or silver. (Black's Law Dictionary 6th edition)
Federal reserve notes - Form of currency issued by Federal Reserve Banks in the likeness of
noninterest bearing promissory note payable to bearer on demand. The Federal Reserve note (e.g.
one, five, ten, etc. dollar bill) is the most widely used paper currency. Such have replaced silver
GLOSSARY PAGE – Definitions and Codes Relied Upon

and gold certificates which were backed by silver and gold. Such reserve notes are direct
obligations of the United States. (Black's Law Dictionary 6th edition)
Straw man or party - A "front"; a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a
transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an agent for another for the purpose
of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principal
may direct respecting the property. Person who purchases property for another to conceal identity
of real purchaser, or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not allowed. (Black's Law Dictionary
6th addition)
Specie - Coin of the precious metals, of a certain weight and fineness, and bearing the stamp of
the government, denoting its value as currency. Metallic money; e.g. gold or silver coins. When
spoken of a contract, the expression "performance in specie" means strictly, or according to the
exact terms. As applied to things, it signifies individuality or identity. Thus, on a bequest of a
specific picture, the legatee would be said to be entitled to the delivery of the picture in specie;
i.e., of the very thing. Whether a thing is due in genere or in specie depends, in each case, on
the will of the transacting parties. (Black's Law Dictionary 6th edition)
Loan - A lending. Delivery by one party to and receipt by another party of sum of money upon
agreement, express or implied, to repay it with or without interest. Boerner v. Colwell Co., 21
Cal.3d 37, 145 Cal.Rptr. 380, 384, 577 P.2d 200. Anything furnished for temporary use to a
person at his request, on condition that it shall be returned, or its equivalent in kind, with or
without compensation for its use. Liberty Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Travelers Indem. Co., 58
Misc.2d 443, 295 N.Y.S.2d 983, 986. (Black's Law Dictionary 6th edition)
Contract - An agreement between two or more persons, which creates an obligation to do or not
to do a particular thing. As defined in Restatement, Second, Contracts § 3: "A contract is a
promise or asset of promises for the breach of which the law gives a remedy, or the performance
of which the law in some way recognizes as a duty." A legal relationship consisting of the rights
and duties of the contracting parties; a promise or set of promises constituting an agreement
between the parties that gives each a legal duty to the other and also the right to seek a remedy
for the breach of those duties. Its essentials are competent parties, subject matter, a legal
consideration, mutuality of agreement, and mutuality of obligation. Lamoureux v. Burrillville
Racing Ass'n, 91 R.I. 94, 161 A.2d 213, 215.
The writing which contains the agreement of parties, with the terms and conditions, and which
serves as a proof of the obligation. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th
edition)
Corporation - An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of
a state. An association of persons created by statute as a legal entity. The law treats the
corporation itself as a person which can sue and be sued. The corporation is distinct from the
individuals who comprise it (shareholders). The corporation survives the death of its investors, as
the shares can usually be transferred. Such entity subsists as a body politic under a special
denomination, which is regarded in law as having a personality and existence distinct from that
of its several members, and which is, by the same authority, vested with the capacity of

continuous succession, irrespective of changes in its membership, either in perpetuity or for a
limited term of years, and of acting as a unit or single individual in matters relating to the
common purpose of the association, within the scope of the powers and authorities conferred
upon such bodies by law. Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 518, 636, 657, 4
L.Ed. 629; U. S. v. Trinidad Coal Co., 137 U.S. 160, 11 S.Ct. 57, 34 L.Ed. 640. (Blacks Law
Dictionary 6th edition)
Person - In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person), though by statute term may
include labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives,
trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. See e.g. National Labor Relations Act, § 2(1), 29
U.S.C.A. § 152; Uniform Partnership Act,§ 2. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th edition)
Artificial persons - Persons created and devised by human laws for the purposes of society and
government, as distinguished from natural persons. Corporations are examples of artificial
persons. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th
edition)
Pro se - A Latin phrase meaning "for himself" or "in one's own behalf." This term denotes a
person who represents herself/himself in court. It is used in some states in place of "in pro per"
and has the same meaning.
In Propria Persona - In one's own person, especially without representation by an attorney. Lat.
'In ones own proper person.' To represent oneself in court without assistance of an attorney, at
least 'on the record.' Often shortened to 'in pro per.'
The U.S. Supreme Court observed in its unanimous decision in Kay v. Ehrler, 499 U.S. 432, that
a lawmaking body may instead prefer to discourage attorneys from electing to appear in propria
persona because such self-representation may often conflict with the general public and
legislative policy favoring the effective and successful prosecution of meritorious claims. The
high court observed that 'Even a skilled lawyer who represents himself is at a disadvantage in
contested litigation. Ethical considerations may make it inappropriate for him to appear as a
witness. He is deprived of the judgment of an independent third party in framing the theory of
the case, evaluating alternative methods of presenting the evidence, cross-examining hostile
witnesses, formulating legal arguments, and in making sure that reason, rather than emotion,
dictates the proper tactical response to unforeseen developments in the courtroom. The adage
that 'a lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client' is the product of years of experience
by seasoned litigators.. Id. at 437-438
An “appearance” may be in propria persona and need not be by attorney.
Debt, contracts. A sum of money due by certain and express agreement. 3 Bl. Com. 154. In a
less technical sense, as in the "act to regulate arbitrations and proceedings in courts of justice" of
Pennsylvania, passed the 21st of March 1806, s. 5, it means and claim for money. In a still more
enlarged sense, it denotes any kind of a just demand; as, the debts of a bankrupt. 4 S. & R. 506.
(Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856 edition)

Goods, property. For some purposes this term includes money, valuable securities, and other
mere personal effects. The term. goods and chattels includes not only personal property in
possession, but also choses in action. 12 Co. 1; 1 Atk. 182. The term chattels is more
comprehensive than that of goods, and will include all animate as well as inanimate property, and
also a chattel real, as a lease for years of house or land. Co. Litt. 118; 1 Russ. Rep. 376. The
word goods simply and without qualification, will pass the whole personal estate when used in a
will, including even stocks in the funds. But in general it will be limited by the context of the
will. Vide 2 Supp. to Ves. jr. 289; 1 Chit. Pr. 89, 90; 1. Ves. jr. 63; Hamm. on Parties, 182; 3 Ves.
212; 1 Yeates, 101; 2 Dall. 142; Ayl. Pand. 296; Wesk. Ins. 260; 1 Rop. on Leg. 189; 1 Bro. C. C.
128; Sugd. Vend. 493, 497; and the articles Biens; Chattels; Furniture. 2. Goods are said to be of
different kinds, as adventitious, such as are given or arise otherwise than by succession; total
goods, or those which accrue from a dowry, or marriage portion; vacant goods, those which are
abandoned or left at large. (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856 edition)
Merchandise. By this term is understood all those things which merchants sell either wholesale
or retail, as dry goods, hardware, groceries, drugs, &c. It is usually applied to personal chattels
only, and to those which are not required for food or immediate support, but such as remain after
having been used or which are used only by a slow consumption. Vide Pardess. n. 8; Dig. 13, 3,
1; Id. 19, 4, 1; Id. 50, 16, 66. 8 Pet. 277; 2 Story, R. 16, 53, 54; 6 Wend. 335. (Bouvier’s Law
Dictionary 1856 edition)
Service contracts. The being employed to serve another.
2. In cases of seduction, the gist of the action is not injury which the seducer has inflicted on the
parent by destroying his peace of mind, and the reputation of his child, but for the consequent
inability to perform those services for which she was accountable to her master or her parent who
assumes this character for the purpose Vide Seduction, and 2 Mees. & W. 539; 7 Car. & P. 528.
(Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856 edition)
Service, feudal law. That duty which the tenant owes to his lord, by reason of his fee or estate.
2. The services, in respect of their quality, were either free or base, and in respect of their
quantity and the time of exacting them, were either certain or uncertain. 2 Bl. Com. 62.
3. In the civil law by service is sometimes understood servitude. (q. v.) (Bouvier’s Law
Dictionary 1856 edition)
Service, practice. To execute a writ or process; as, to serve a writ of capias signifies to arrest a
defendant under the process; Kirby, 48; 2 Aik. R. 338; 11 Mass. 181; to serve a summons, is to
deliver a copy of it at the house of the party, or to deliver it to him personally, or to read it to him;
notices and other papers are served by delivering the same at the house of the party, or to him in
person. (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856 edition)
2. When the service of a writ is prevented by the act of the party on whom it is to be served, it
will, in general, be sufficient if the officer do everything in his power to serve it. 39 Eng. C. L. R.
431 1 M. & G. 238. (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856 edition)

Organization: Organization includes a corporation, government or governmental subdivision or
agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership or association, two or more persons having a joint
or common interest, or any other legal or commercial entity. U.C.C. § 1-201(28). Also see
Charitable Organization. (Black's Law Dictionary 6th edition)
Form - A model or skeleton of an instrument to be used in a judicial proceeding, containing the
principal necessary matters, the proper technical terms or phrases, and whatever else is necessary
to make it formally correct, arranged in proper and methodical order, and capable of being
adapted to the circumstances of the specific case. 2. As distinguished from “substance,” “form”
means the legal or technical manner or order to be observed in legal instruments or juridical
proceedings, or In the construction of legal documents or processes. The distinction between
“form” and “substance” is often important in reference to the validity or amendment of
pleadings. If the matter of the plea is bad or insufficient, irrespective of the manner of setting it
forth, the defect is one of substance. If the matter of the plea is good and sufficient, but is
inartificially or defectively pleaded, the defect is one of form. Pierson v. Insurance Co.,7 Houst.
(Del.) 307, 31 Atl. 060.
NOTE (DELETE BEFORE USE) You can add more definitions as needed for your type of case
as well. If they will not use this (they will not), then answer based on your own meanings! So if
you miss any words on your sheet’s it may not be that important as you proceed…”well since
you wong use my definition…” (then answer with anything the is actually correct (but not in
their context they are trapping you into)….ie: “run” can mean running fast, you got the runs, a
motor running, to ule a group, to run for elected office, go to the store, etc. You are no crazy or
ever wrong. But they won’t be able to move forward and trap you. Put burden of proof on them.

EXHIBIT ___
indebtedness, national bank currency, Federal Reserve notes, Federal Reserve bank notes, coupons,
United States notes, Treasury notes, gold certificates, silver certificates, fractional notes, certificates of
deposit, bills, checks, or drafts for money, drawn by or upon authorized officers of the United States,
stamps and other representatives of value, of whatever denomination, issued under any Act of Congress,
and canceled United States stamps. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 685.)
(a) Stocks and obligations of the United States Government are exempt from taxation by a State or
political subdivision of a State. The exemption applies to each form of taxation that would require the
obligation, the interest on the obligation, or both, to be considered in computing a tax, except—
(1) a nondiscriminatory franchise tax or another non-property tax instead of a franchise tax,
imposed on a corporation; and
evidences of ownership issued by the Government or an agency and the tax treatment of gain and loss
from the disposition of those obligations and evidences of ownership is decided under the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).
An obligation that the Federal Housing Administration had agreed, under a contract made before March 1,
1941, to issue at a future date, has the tax exemption privileges provided by the authorizing law at the
time of the contract. This subsection does not apply to obligations and evidences of ownership issued by
the District of Columbia, a territory or possession of the United States, or a department, agency,
instrumentality, or political subdivision of the District, territory, or possession. (Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13,
1982, 96 Stat. 945; Pub. L. 99–514, § 2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095.)
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal;
coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make anything but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of
Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or
grant any Title of Nobility. No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties
on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s [sic] inspection Laws:
and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the
Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Control of
the Congress. No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or
Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign
Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
Also consider State Law (insert your state laws on this if not in Washington)
Washington State RCW 82.08.0254 - Exemptions - Nontaxable sales. The tax levied by RCW 82.08.020
shall not apply to sales which the state is prohibited from taxing under the Constitution of this state or the
Constitution or laws of the United States.
Exhibit for Offer to Pay 31 USC 3124 etc

DELETE COMMENTS - This MAY apply to a first appearance for traffic, civil fine matter, civil suit, or criminal charge.
THIS IS NOT a Template NOR legal advice. Do your homework, case law research, and customize for you court and
jurisdiction needs.
$1 stamp with Blue
Thumbprint bleeding on the
page and autographed across is as
- :First-Middle: Last:
:copy-right/copy-claim:
THE 19TH DISTRICT COURT OF
LANE COUNTY, TEXAS
United States etc or )
THE STATE OF TEXAS (or other party) )
Plaintiff )
v. ) Motion for Discovery
) Conditional Acceptance
) Motion to Dismiss
JOHN H. DOE ) Case 2017-2107-C1
Named Defendant )
_________________________________________________________
Filed using Registered Mail#___________________(or in person if applicable)
Motion for Discovery - Conditional Acceptance – Motion to Dismiss
I accept what the plaintiff has offered upon first addressing the following issues. It appears there
are several errors and omission that need to be corrected to proceed. Appearing by special
appearance, I can only offer a plea of “guilty to the facts”, but innocent of a crime (or maybe not
liable for the alleged debt as applicable). The following items are effectively discovery.
Therefore, I can accept this claim and proceed upon proof of claim:
1. That the plaintiff can provide admissible evidence and the name of a witness who will
testify that I am a decedent as named on this case referring to JOHN H. DOE, and proof
that I am not here as John-Henry Doe, as beneficiary.
PAGE 1
Motion to Dismiss First Appearance-Stop Case Fast

testify that my given original name is not John-Henry Doe, as opposed to the erroneous
estate or trust name on the documents listed as JOHN H. DOE.
testify that I, John-Henry, Doe as beneficiary have accepted liability for accounting for
the named decedent, as it’s surety.
4. That the plaintiff provide admissible evidence and the name of a witness who will testify,
that the judge and/or prosecutor(s) in this matter are in fact not the liable public trustees
and liable sureties for settling and closing this account, upon my acceptance and directing
to them to settle this account. I rebut any presumptions to the contrary based on previous
appearances and filings and disclaim being trustee/defendant as named. I rescind
signatures and withdraw previous appearances and agreements.
5. That the plaintiff, by failing to provide these items indicated above, agrees there is an
evidence of a wrong party claim on the record.
6. That the plaintiff provides admissible evidence and the name of a witness who will testify
that the prosecutor and parties such as judges, magistrates, clerks, and other court related
employees, do not have a reportable tax liability for the Alternate Valuation on their
Carryover Basis in this matter. By not providing this evidence will stand as evidence that
all attorneys, agents, and prosecutor, must submit their bond and/or insurance information
for the record, and thus disclose their indemnity insurance carrier information to me, in
the event I am harmed. That bond they provide shall be further backed by lawful money,
according to Article 1 Section 10 of the US Constitution.
PAGE 2

7. That the plaintiff provide certified copies of the oath of office, bonds, and insurance
policy claim information for all the judges, magistrates, my own attorney(if applicable),
and for the plaintiff/prosecuting attorneys involved in this matter.
8. That the plaintiff provide a written guarantee that judges, magistrates, my own attorney,
and prosecuting attorneys involved in this matter guarantee to uphold all of my God
given and constitutional rights. Those rights shall be listed and guaranteed in writing by
all parties.
9. That the plaintiff provides proof of authority showing where any parties making a claim
on the estate of JOHN H. DOE or trying to administer it, are done so with my express
written permission, as beneficiary.
10. That the plaintiff provides on the record all 1099 OIDs from all parties for the tax due.
Failing to provide this, I have no choice but to report this matter to The Treasury
Inspector General, the IRS CID on a form 4490 and 8281 or otherwise, as a report of a
potential tax evasion, and further inform the Postal Service and Universal Postal Union of
such issues. I am duty bound as a private American to report such issues when I become
aware of a public servant engaged in money laundering, mail fraud, fictitious conveyance
of language under 18 USC 1001, and as otherwise necessary.
I have presented and registered this document-vessel under the jurisdiction of the Universal
Postal Union by paying the transit fees of $1 as the postmaster cancelling the stamp of this
vessel, for this vessel’s delivery and peaceful protection under registered mail# RE 123 456 789
US.
PAGE 3

For the failing to provide these discovery items and proofs within the time specified, this
document on the record will also stand as a Motion to Dismiss, for failure to state a claim for
which relief can be granted, with prejudice. This motion goes into in effect if all matters are not
fully disclosed with supporting evidence within 14 days of receipt by the court and responded to
under oath by the responding parties.
Until such time all conditions above are proven and authenticated on the record, all previous
actions, orders, signatures, and pleas are now withdrawn and void, until above evidence is
provided proving jurisdiction to proceed.
I accept proceeding further if that in any further proceedings that all parties speaking on the
record, including attorneys, swear in under penalties of perjury, or the court agrees all parties
speaking hearsay and without presenting authenticated evidence. The plaintiff shall also agree to
submit their reply or rebuttal point by point, only using the
Correct-Sentence-Structure-Parse-Grammar-Communication for the void of
fictitious-conveyance of language, otherwise they agree they are possibly violating the following
laws including but not limited to: ~Title~42: USCS~1986, ~FRCP-9-B: Fraud by confession,
~Title~18: USCS~1001 & 1002: false-statements, ~Title~15: USCS~1692E Fraud & Misleading
Statements, ~Title~15: USCS~78 ~ ff: Penalty: $25,000,000, ~Title~42: USCS~1985-1:
Conspiracy-Civil, ~Title~42: USCS~1985-2: Obstruction-evidence & Witness, ~Title~42:
USCS~1985-3: Depriving Evidence & Witness, ~Title~18: USCS~1961: RICO, ~Title~18:
PAGE 4

USCS~242: Coloring of the Laws = Ailing, ~Title~18: USCS~241: Criminal-Conspiracy = tort,
~Title~18: USCS~3: Criminal-Participation-Knowledge, ~Title~42: USCS~1983: Personal
Damages, ~Title~18: USCS~1512: Obstruction of the Law, ~Title~18: USCS~1341: Frauds and
swindles, ~Title~18: USCS~1342: Fictitious name or address, ~Title~18: USCS~241:
Conspiracy, ~Title~18: USCS~242: Criminal Deprivation of Rights, ~Title~28: USC~1359: Loss
of Jurisdiction by Collusion.
Notice to principal is notice to agent.
:______________________ Date________, 202__
Printed John-Henry Doe, Living Man name, LS
Beneficiary for defendant estate JOHN L. DOE
Submitted with the assistance of counsel
Back of each page, thumbprint and sign - Also
Plus bottom of back side of last page…$1 stamp with Blue
Thumbprint bleeding on the page and autographed across is as
- :First-Middle: Last:
:copy-right/copy-claim:
PAGE 5

COMMENT - MAKE THIS YOUR OWN TO FIT YOUR SITUATION
– NOT Legal or TAX Advice - print in all black and print. (Use a blue autograph at the end)
John Henry Doe
c/o 123 Rocky Road
Dallas, Texas ~89129
February 15, 2019
Dewey Cheetum and How
ATTN: R. GREGORY EAST
123 NORTH LOOPY - SUITE # 100
HOUSTON, TX 77009
Dear Dewey Cheetum - ATTORNEY AT LAW (or court name, etc)
Subject: Conditional Offer to Pay and Settle for Full Satisfaction and Accord
On March 19, 2018 I was served a lawsuit (or received a bill, tax bill, judgment claim, etc
– whatever applies). In that (lawsuit-bill-judgment whatever) you state this said suit
cannot be dismissed until the court costs as well as the claim of plaintiffs and any
intervener have been paid in full (cite whatever they claim).
As an attorney (or whoever) you have an obligation to your clients, ENTITY NAME
CHARGING YOU, your ambiguous lawsuit does not answer one important question…
What specie will ENTITY NAME CHARGING YOU accept or lawfully require as
payment?
Please see 18 USC § 8 and then 31 USC § 3124 and Article 1 Section 10 United States
Constitution (see EXHIBIT A).
I want to get this tax bill (ie: child support, judgment, property tax or whatever) resolved
lawfully as soon as possible. I will grant 10 days for your response or I will assume you
agree that nothing further is owed, and this matter is then resolved for full satisfaction
and accord.
Sincerely,
By: John Henry Doe (your blue autograph here)
John Henry Doe – without prejudice
c/o 123 Rocky Road
Dallas, Texas [ 89129 ]
COMMENT – Should be the first conditional acceptance response to any claim of a debt. Might be used for
state, country and federal tax agencies, debt collectors, and even public debts, is: mortgage, child support,
bank loan matters in court, past judgments as that is still via court, etc. After 10 days - send a copy of the
Offer to Pay Debts Taxes Child Supp Judgments

first letter, and a proof of delivery copy, with simple reminder the 10 days has competed, as a Notice of
Default and indicate you will give 3 more days to respond. Then after 3 more final days, send a copy of all
previous documents and a short letter as a Notice of Fault - indicating this matter is closed for full
satisfaction and accord, as the parties agree by their non-response or non-rebuttal forms and agreement that
nothing is owed. After 3 steps you have a record. Save all delivery confirmations evidence.

EXHIBIT A
indebtedness, national bank currency, Federal Reserve notes, Federal Reserve bank notes,
coupons, United States notes, Treasury notes, gold certificates, silver certificates, fractional notes,
certificates of deposit, bills, checks, or drafts for money, drawn by or upon authorized officers of
the United States, stamps and other representatives of value, of whatever denomination, issued
under any Act of Congress, and canceled United States stamps. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat.
685.)
(a) Stocks and obligations of the United States Government are exempt from taxation by a
State or political subdivision of a State. The exemption applies to each form of taxation that
would require the obligation, the interest on the obligation, or both, to be considered in computing
a tax, except—
(1) a nondiscriminatory franchise tax or another non-property tax instead of a franchise
tax, imposed on a corporation; and
evidences of ownership issued by the Government or an agency and the tax treatment of gain and
loss from the disposition of those obligations and evidences of ownership is decided under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).
An obligation that the Federal Housing Administration had agreed, under a contract made before
March 1, 1941, to issue at a future date, has the tax exemption privileges provided by the
authorizing law at the time of the contract. This subsection does not apply to obligations and
evidences of ownership issued by the District of Columbia, a territory or possession of the United
States, or a department, agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision of the District, territory,
or possession. (Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 945; Pub. L. 99–514, § 2, Oct. 22, 1986,
100 Stat. 2095.)
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and
Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make anything but gold and silver Coin a Tender in
Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the
Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. No State shall, without the Consent of the
Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely
necessary for executing it’s [sic] inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts,
laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States;
and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Control of the Congress. No State shall,
without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time
of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or
engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
Also consider State Law (see your states law on this)

Washington State RCW 82.08.0254 - Exemptions - Nontaxable sales. The tax levied by RCW
82.08.020 shall not apply to sales which the state is prohibited from taxing under the Constitution
of this state or the Constitution or laws of the United States.

More advanced thoughts on this… DO NOT include in what you file, just
information.
From a member - comments. RE: the recent 'conditional acceptance' letter posted. I
presented this issue to a Circuit Court 40 years ago, and thereafter the case file somehow
“disappeared” from the file room. The question in your newly posted 'conditional
acceptance' letter is not quite complete in my experience. My version of the more
complete question took me over one year of continuous research to develop. I share it
with you now…
Silver Bullet Question (to city, state, court, etc.):
"To remain in Honor, and absent a legal tender from the Debtor / Taxpayer for payment
of this debt / tax, or your rejection of any non-legal tender from the Debtor / Taxpayer for
payment of this debt / tax, what has this State made by Law or Statute - a compelled
tender from Debtor / Taxpayer, in payment of this debt / tax?"
Discussion: Now it's important to know that the above question was put to the court at a
hearing before a judge who was 80 + years old (very experienced). The young attorney
for the county objected to the question saying:
"there is plenty of Federal Reserve Notes available to pay this property tax bill"...to
which the learned judge replied to him: "He's not using the term “legal tender”' as a
noun (paper Fed notes), he's using the term legal “TENDER” as a VERB (offer). This
case will be taken under advisement. Court is adjourned." Parentheses mine.
Note: legal or other tender “for” payment (anything EXCEPT dollars of gold: cows, pigs,
notes, in lieu of lawful money) VS Compelled tender (specific thing defined by law /
statute) ‘in’ payment.
All “bills” presented are denominated in “dollars”: Federally defined as a quantity and
purity of gold (still on the law books today). Therefore billed in “dollars” (of gold) / paid
IN “dollars” (of gold) = done deal (use of Fed notes = deferred, to another “sucker”
deal).
But, billed in “dollars” (defined as gold) and no dollars (of gold) available to pay, leaves
only a (legal or non-legal) tender (offer) of something else for (to take the place of)
dollars (of gold), in order to ‘satisfy’ the “dollar” billing and consider the matter
“discharged” and ‘settled’ (with something else to appease the ‘beast’, other than what
was originally demanded in ‘dollars’).
It’s a NOVATION of the (actual?, implied?, tacit?) “dollar’ denominated contract!
A “legal” tender is not the only tender in ones quiver of “tenders”... therefore IF a legal
tender (i.e. offer of Fed notes) is made by a Debtor pursuant to a dollar denominated
contract, then it MUST be accepted by the Creditor.

HOWEVER, if no legal tender is made, but instead Debtor 'offers' something else
(non-legal tender, i.e. cows, pigs, etc.) for dollars (of gold) billed, then the State can
CHOOSE to accept or reject any non-legal tender offers by Debtor (non-'legal' tender /
offer: NOT defined by statute).
IF the State rejects a particular non-legal tender offer (i.e. cows), then a Debtor can try
making another non-legal tender offer (i.e. pigs), etc. hoping to get “acceptance” of
Debtor’s attempted NOVATION of original “dollar” denominated contract.
A Debtor is not required to OFFER Federal reserve notes, heck he might not have
any to offer. However a Creditor IS required to accept Federal Reserve notes when
offered, and IF the contract is denominated in “dollars”.
Eventually, all these government rejected non-legal tender offers are going to become
repetitive, so in exasperation the Debtor can finally throw up his hands and pose
the...Silver Bullet Question!!!
A Debtor has to set the contextual stage of attempts, to stay in Honor. Do this first, before
delivering the ‘checkmate’ Silver Bullet Question to their deceitful game. Actually, it is
‘they’ who begin with dishonesty by billing in ‘dollars’, KNOWING they are no longer
available to make payment...it’s an impossible demand to make actual ‘payment’. ‘They’
might as well send you a bill denominated in Moon Rocks...where YOU gonna get
any?!?!
So one is (seemingly) ‘cornered’ into their (hope you don’t catch on) ‘no win’ legal
tender game, that the public believes is only ‘payable’ with ‘their’ Fed notes and Fed
computer digits (bank accounts). So the public automatically controls the Fed’s inflation
machine by ‘returning’ the Fed’s funny-money creation back to its source. Otherwise a
loaf of bread would skyrocket to $300 overnight and the con revealed. The public is
oblivious to their own ‘trump card’ in the palm of their hand.
Of course, along with the Silver Bullet Question one would include the ‘10 days to
respond UCC stuff’ to completely judo-flip their game back on ‘them’.
This is a potent analysis of ‘their’ game...Answer to Silver Bullet Question: Nothing!
Hope this helps...Don

(NOTE - Use to address any charge, bill, warrant, or financial judgment - covert to all black text)
1020 Form Administrative Process.
You can call it a form 1020 or whatever form you want, but it is an Administrative Process.
Use when someone sends you a presentment (ie: bill, summons, complaint, warrant, etc).
Do not argue, simply offer to pay to say in honor.
You perform a general 3 Step Administrative Process. Document all information carefully:
1: You respond to their offer requesting VERIFIED proof of debt or proof of undertaking,
obligating their performance by a qualified third party. Put the ball in their court. Do not argue.
Do NOT mix this Creditor approach with arguing. Creditor do not argue, they settle.
2: They do not respond as usual, you send "Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure", to give
them another chance to provide proof.
3: They do not respond as usual, you send "Final Notice of Default".
You now have a paper trail showing you were attempting to offer to “pay” their “bill” regarding all
legal matters, to stay within honor. This normally stops them where it matters most, even if they
just remain silent. Conditional Acceptance is far more powerful than defending, arguing, or
paying a debt with a debt. They will likely default (Nihil Dicit) by dishonor through non-response,
partial response, or non-performance, thus agreeing by their silent acquiescence (silence is
agreement in law). After that no such paper debt or undertaking (obligation) exists. The only
goal is to make them go away and stop. If they do further you may have to start billing them
then sue, but don’t expect to win money, just make them stop.
Editing Notes - Convert all text to black, obtain several certified mail coupons ahead of time so
you can insert them on the docs. Include copies of previous mailed documents as you go, plus
include the original bill with each mailing. Paint a picture at every step. Find and replace does a
nice job of editing but be sure to verify every word before use. Edit to fit your situation and facts.
NOT LEGALADVICE
Offer to Pay Admin Process

FORM 1020
City of Vancouver, Washington
A private corporation
Cause No. 45678-1 Date: May 15, 2021
______________________________________________________________________
NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS AT CITY OF VANCOUVER
An attorney or a Private Corporation is assumed to know the law, it is the obligation of an
attorney or a Private Corporation, to see that any alleged FINES, FEES, CHARGES, etc., are
collected lawfully, correctly, and completely. In order to correctly "quote" pay this alleged
FINES, FEES, CHARGES, etc. JOHN H. DOE, requires the following information, from
attorneys at City of VANCOUVER. Complete this FORM and return it to the address you have
on file to enable JOHN H. DOE to understand and lawfully comply with this alleged FINES,
FEES, CHARGES, etc.. This Form raises formal questions with regards to this alleged FINES,
FEES, CHARGES, etc., that only your attorneys can answer. THIS IS MY GOOD FAITH
OFFER TO PAY UPON PROOF OF CLAIM.
1. Under the caption VERDICT what does the number 200.00 refer to: (check one) obligations
of the United States Government ___; National bank currency ____ ; Bonds____; Certificates of
Indebtedness ___; Federal Reserve Notes ___; Bills___; or Other
______________________________________________________ (Explain)
2. Under the caption VERDICT what does the numbers 372.30 refer to (check one)
obligations of the United States Government ___; National bank currency ____ ; Bonds____;
Certificates of Indebtedness ___; Federal Reserve Notes ___; Bills____; or Other
______________________________________________________ (Explain)
3. Does that statement refer to: consideration of obligations or other securities of the United
States, directly or indirectly? (Check one) Yes ____ No____.
4. Does the computation of this alleged VERDICT require consideration of obligations or other
securities of the United States, directly or indirectly? (Check one) Yes ___; or No ___;
Most individuals can complete this FORM in three minutes. You are required by law including
UCC 3-104 & 3-115, to complete this FORM, before any payment may be made or agreed to. As
a private corporation you are assumed to know the law, and not misleading. You made several
statements in your VERDICT to JOHN H. DOE that JOHN H. DOE owes something to
someone. It is your obligation to answer the forgoing questions on FORM 1020, or a default will
be issued by JOHN H. DOE against City of VANCOUVER a private corporation, for trying to
mislead JOHN H. DOE by asking JOHN H. DOE for something that he does not owe, or you
don't know what that something is, so as attorneys, you are assumed to know the law.
Page 1

Various letters set2.pdf

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Various letters set2.pdf

Similar to Various letters set2.pdf (20)

More from MarcusRoland1

More from MarcusRoland1 (14)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Various letters set2.pdf