SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 20
MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL
MODELS TO FORECAST THE
RESULTS OF EURO2016 QUALIFIERS
Bence Jámbor – Dávid Szabó – Máté Jámbor
Budapest Business School -
Consultant: Dr. Tamás Kovács university docent
SUBSTANCE
I. Introduction
II. Overview of the literature
III. Development of the teams
performance forecasting
model
IV. Results
INTRODUCTION
 Hungarian football: nadir (WC1986; EC: 1972)
 Present and the recent past: failures
(2006: Malta 1-2; 2013: Netherlands 8-1)
Successes in the past:
 1938, 1954
(Aranycsapat/The Gold team)
Puskás; WC: II.place
 1964: EC: III. place
(Mészöly-Bene-Albert)
 1966: WC-quarterfinal
 Olympic Champions:
1952,1964,1968
LITERATURE
Hungarian and international scientific
articles forecast of a football match outcome
 FIFA World Ranking (MAREK KAMINSKI –
INCONSISTENCIES IN THE FIFA RANKINGS)
 InStat (PÉTER KAKAS- JUST CAN NOT
PLAY FOOTBALL INSTEAD OF THEM ALL-SEEING SOFTWARE)
 Home field advantage(HENRIK HEGEDŰS: AWAY THE
DRAW IS GOOD RESULT TOO)
BASIC CONCEPT OF THE
FORECASTING MODEL
Final outcome of a national match
1. Performance
form of the players
in their club teams
2. Basic
qualities of the
players
3. Other
factors
Defending(%):
- Succesful
passes
- Challenges won
- Aerial
challenges won
- Succesful
tackles
Attacking(%):
- Succesful passes
- Challenges won
- Aerial challenges
won
- Succesful keypasses
- Shots on goal
- Succesful dribblings
- Fifa
world ranking
- Last 5
comptetitive
games
- Home field
10.000 data
Balázs’s performance on the
club match before the
examined national match
Keypass% (here
it’s missing)
We used this page to examine all the
players of the 58 matches.
An example of the 58 examined matches
Defense skills
Attack skills
Create one defense- and attack value in each teams
Creating defense factors
 SPSS, factor analysis, 3 factors from 5 variablesVariance-proportion
method the variables with the closest relation one factor
1.factor: save-,
tackles %
2. factor:
challenges won-,
aerial challenges
won %
3. factor: passes
%
3 factors 1 defense value
Creating attack factors
 3 factors from 6 variables
1. factor:
challenges won-,
aerial challanges
won-, dribbling %
2. factor:
keypasses-, shots
on goal %
3. factor: aerial
challenges won-,
dribblings-, passes
%
3 factors 1 attack value
MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL
MODELS
Multiple linear regression
 difference between current form of attacker players and current form of opponent
defender players (both team)
difference between current InStat index of attacker players and current InStat index of
opponent defender players (both team)
difference between FIFA index of attacker players and opponent defender players
number of scored goals of attacker players in their previous club game
number of assists of attacker players in their previous club game
difference between the trends of their previous five matches of the two national teams
difference between the Fifa world rank score of the the two national teams
dummy variable of home field
HOME FIELD
ADVANTAGE
 In 2012 English Premier League decided in the last fixture
Manchester City is the champion
REGRESSION MODEL
#1
Model
Coefficients
t p
B Std.
Error
Own attacker– opponent
defender ,030 ,007 4,097 ,000
Own attacker– opponent
defender InStat ,005 ,003 2,028 ,045
Own attacker– opponent
defender Fifa ,092 ,032 2,836 ,005
Own FIFA World Rank–
Opponent FIFA World Rank -,001 ,000 -1,680 ,096
Own Homefield Advantage ,675 ,221 3,052 ,003
REGRESSION MODEL
#2
Model
Coefficients
t p
B Std.
Error
Attacker– Defender (based on Fifa
form)
,033 ,010 3,337 ,001
Own attacker– Own defender (InStat)
,011 ,002 4,653 ,000
Own homefield advantage
,850 ,227 3,754 ,000
THE EXPLANATORY
POWER OF THE
REGRESSION MODELS
R - multiple correlation coefficient
R2 - multiple determination coefficient
Model #1
R R Square Adjusted R
Square
,717 ,515 ,493
Model 2#
R R Square Adjusted R
Square
,678 ,459 ,440
TESTING THE RESULTS
OF THE MODELS
n=58 matches
 Prediction of the outcomes
 Model #1 56,9% (33/58)
 Model #2 62,1% (36/58)
 Preditction of the number of scored goals
 Model #1 33,6% (39/116)
 Model #2 31,0% (36/116)
HITS
Match Result Estimated Result
Greece– Bosnia 0-0 0-0
Bosnia – Slovakia 0-1 0-1
Ukraine– England 0-0 0-0
Greece– Slovakia 1-0 1-0
France– Spain 0-1 0-1
Portugal– Sweden 1-0 1-0
Croatia– Island 2-0 2-0
Switzerland– Slovenia 1-0 1-0
SOME OUTCOME
HITTED MATCHES
Match Result Estimated Result
Bosnia-Greece 3-1 1-0
Romania-Greece 1-1 0-0
Austria-Germany 1-2 0-1
Sweden-Austria 2-1 1-0
Island-Slovenia 2-4 0-1
Italy-Denmark 3-1 2-0
Denmark-Italy 2-2 0-0
COULD HUNGARY… QUALIFIY TO
EC2016 ?
sequence match w d l score
goals
receiv
ed
poin
ts
1. ROM 10 7 2 1 10 2 23
2. NIR 10 5 3 2 9 7 18
3. HUN 10 4 4 2 8 6 16
4. GRE 10 3 3 4 4 6 12
5. FIN 10 3 2 5 7 9 11
Already played matches
Estimated result
Qualify to EC2016
Remount-qualifier
HUN ROM GRE NIR FIN
HUN - 1-0 0-0 1-2 1-0
ROM 1-1 - 1-0 2-0 1-0
GRE 1-0 0-1 - 0-2 1-0
NIR 1-1 0-0 0-0 - 2-1
FIN 1-1 0-2 1-1 2-0 -
THANK YOU FOR
ATTENTION!
Jámbor Bence – Szabó Dávid – Jámbor Máté

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Chapter 6 OOPS Concept
Chapter 6 OOPS ConceptChapter 6 OOPS Concept
Chapter 6 OOPS ConceptAmrit Kaur
 
Common Spots Where Roaches Hide in Hotels
Common Spots Where Roaches Hide in HotelsCommon Spots Where Roaches Hide in Hotels
Common Spots Where Roaches Hide in HotelsBayswater Pest Control
 
NOW/ Zoom on Beverages: Chapter 1
NOW/ Zoom on Beverages: Chapter 1NOW/ Zoom on Beverages: Chapter 1
NOW/ Zoom on Beverages: Chapter 1NOW/UNIT
 
Meeting 1 types of computers ppt
Meeting 1 types of computers pptMeeting 1 types of computers ppt
Meeting 1 types of computers pptjuniato276
 
Telematics PPT 2016
Telematics PPT 2016Telematics PPT 2016
Telematics PPT 2016Joe Crandall
 
Revolutionising Facility Management Services Through Internet of Things - Is ...
Revolutionising Facility Management Services Through Internet of Things - Is ...Revolutionising Facility Management Services Through Internet of Things - Is ...
Revolutionising Facility Management Services Through Internet of Things - Is ...Dr. Mazlan Abbas
 
μιακυριακή του απρίλη
μιακυριακή του απρίλημιακυριακή του απρίλη
μιακυριακή του απρίληDora Batsi
 
συναισθήματα γράφω
συναισθήματα γράφωσυναισθήματα γράφω
συναισθήματα γράφωDora Batsi
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Chapter 6 OOPS Concept
Chapter 6 OOPS ConceptChapter 6 OOPS Concept
Chapter 6 OOPS Concept
 
Common Spots Where Roaches Hide in Hotels
Common Spots Where Roaches Hide in HotelsCommon Spots Where Roaches Hide in Hotels
Common Spots Where Roaches Hide in Hotels
 
NOW/ Zoom on Beverages: Chapter 1
NOW/ Zoom on Beverages: Chapter 1NOW/ Zoom on Beverages: Chapter 1
NOW/ Zoom on Beverages: Chapter 1
 
Meeting 1 types of computers ppt
Meeting 1 types of computers pptMeeting 1 types of computers ppt
Meeting 1 types of computers ppt
 
Telematics PPT 2016
Telematics PPT 2016Telematics PPT 2016
Telematics PPT 2016
 
Revolutionising Facility Management Services Through Internet of Things - Is ...
Revolutionising Facility Management Services Through Internet of Things - Is ...Revolutionising Facility Management Services Through Internet of Things - Is ...
Revolutionising Facility Management Services Through Internet of Things - Is ...
 
μιακυριακή του απρίλη
μιακυριακή του απρίλημιακυριακή του απρίλη
μιακυριακή του απρίλη
 
συναισθήματα γράφω
συναισθήματα γράφωσυναισθήματα γράφω
συναισθήματα γράφω
 

Similar to ANGOL PREZI_kész

Football, Data and Crushing Competition
Football, Data and Crushing CompetitionFootball, Data and Crushing Competition
Football, Data and Crushing CompetitionJoana Santos Silva
 
A Framework For Scheduling Professional Sports Leagues
A Framework For Scheduling Professional Sports LeaguesA Framework For Scheduling Professional Sports Leagues
A Framework For Scheduling Professional Sports LeaguesAmber Ford
 
A graphical model for football story snippet synthesis
A graphical model for football story snippet synthesisA graphical model for football story snippet synthesis
A graphical model for football story snippet synthesisSangram Gaikwad
 
[DSC Europe 23] Stefano Gemin & Lidija Jovanovska - Leveraging Language Model...
[DSC Europe 23] Stefano Gemin & Lidija Jovanovska - Leveraging Language Model...[DSC Europe 23] Stefano Gemin & Lidija Jovanovska - Leveraging Language Model...
[DSC Europe 23] Stefano Gemin & Lidija Jovanovska - Leveraging Language Model...DataScienceConferenc1
 
Global Peripheral Nerve Repair Market: Opportunities and Forecast (2017-2022)
 Global Peripheral Nerve Repair Market: Opportunities and Forecast (2017-2022)  Global Peripheral Nerve Repair Market: Opportunities and Forecast (2017-2022)
Global Peripheral Nerve Repair Market: Opportunities and Forecast (2017-2022) AzothAnalytics
 

Similar to ANGOL PREZI_kész (7)

Football, Data and Crushing Competition
Football, Data and Crushing CompetitionFootball, Data and Crushing Competition
Football, Data and Crushing Competition
 
A Framework For Scheduling Professional Sports Leagues
A Framework For Scheduling Professional Sports LeaguesA Framework For Scheduling Professional Sports Leagues
A Framework For Scheduling Professional Sports Leagues
 
Nsw rio
Nsw rioNsw rio
Nsw rio
 
A graphical model for football story snippet synthesis
A graphical model for football story snippet synthesisA graphical model for football story snippet synthesis
A graphical model for football story snippet synthesis
 
[DSC Europe 23] Stefano Gemin & Lidija Jovanovska - Leveraging Language Model...
[DSC Europe 23] Stefano Gemin & Lidija Jovanovska - Leveraging Language Model...[DSC Europe 23] Stefano Gemin & Lidija Jovanovska - Leveraging Language Model...
[DSC Europe 23] Stefano Gemin & Lidija Jovanovska - Leveraging Language Model...
 
Global Peripheral Nerve Repair Market: Opportunities and Forecast (2017-2022)
 Global Peripheral Nerve Repair Market: Opportunities and Forecast (2017-2022)  Global Peripheral Nerve Repair Market: Opportunities and Forecast (2017-2022)
Global Peripheral Nerve Repair Market: Opportunities and Forecast (2017-2022)
 
Symmetry 12-00356-v2
Symmetry 12-00356-v2Symmetry 12-00356-v2
Symmetry 12-00356-v2
 

ANGOL PREZI_kész

  • 1. MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL MODELS TO FORECAST THE RESULTS OF EURO2016 QUALIFIERS Bence Jámbor – Dávid Szabó – Máté Jámbor Budapest Business School - Consultant: Dr. Tamás Kovács university docent
  • 2. SUBSTANCE I. Introduction II. Overview of the literature III. Development of the teams performance forecasting model IV. Results
  • 3. INTRODUCTION  Hungarian football: nadir (WC1986; EC: 1972)  Present and the recent past: failures (2006: Malta 1-2; 2013: Netherlands 8-1) Successes in the past:  1938, 1954 (Aranycsapat/The Gold team) Puskás; WC: II.place  1964: EC: III. place (Mészöly-Bene-Albert)  1966: WC-quarterfinal  Olympic Champions: 1952,1964,1968
  • 4. LITERATURE Hungarian and international scientific articles forecast of a football match outcome  FIFA World Ranking (MAREK KAMINSKI – INCONSISTENCIES IN THE FIFA RANKINGS)  InStat (PÉTER KAKAS- JUST CAN NOT PLAY FOOTBALL INSTEAD OF THEM ALL-SEEING SOFTWARE)  Home field advantage(HENRIK HEGEDŰS: AWAY THE DRAW IS GOOD RESULT TOO)
  • 5. BASIC CONCEPT OF THE FORECASTING MODEL Final outcome of a national match 1. Performance form of the players in their club teams 2. Basic qualities of the players 3. Other factors Defending(%): - Succesful passes - Challenges won - Aerial challenges won - Succesful tackles Attacking(%): - Succesful passes - Challenges won - Aerial challenges won - Succesful keypasses - Shots on goal - Succesful dribblings - Fifa world ranking - Last 5 comptetitive games - Home field
  • 7. Balázs’s performance on the club match before the examined national match Keypass% (here it’s missing) We used this page to examine all the players of the 58 matches.
  • 8. An example of the 58 examined matches Defense skills Attack skills
  • 9. Create one defense- and attack value in each teams Creating defense factors  SPSS, factor analysis, 3 factors from 5 variablesVariance-proportion method the variables with the closest relation one factor 1.factor: save-, tackles % 2. factor: challenges won-, aerial challenges won % 3. factor: passes % 3 factors 1 defense value
  • 10. Creating attack factors  3 factors from 6 variables 1. factor: challenges won-, aerial challanges won-, dribbling % 2. factor: keypasses-, shots on goal % 3. factor: aerial challenges won-, dribblings-, passes % 3 factors 1 attack value
  • 11. MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL MODELS Multiple linear regression  difference between current form of attacker players and current form of opponent defender players (both team) difference between current InStat index of attacker players and current InStat index of opponent defender players (both team) difference between FIFA index of attacker players and opponent defender players number of scored goals of attacker players in their previous club game number of assists of attacker players in their previous club game difference between the trends of their previous five matches of the two national teams difference between the Fifa world rank score of the the two national teams dummy variable of home field
  • 12. HOME FIELD ADVANTAGE  In 2012 English Premier League decided in the last fixture Manchester City is the champion
  • 13. REGRESSION MODEL #1 Model Coefficients t p B Std. Error Own attacker– opponent defender ,030 ,007 4,097 ,000 Own attacker– opponent defender InStat ,005 ,003 2,028 ,045 Own attacker– opponent defender Fifa ,092 ,032 2,836 ,005 Own FIFA World Rank– Opponent FIFA World Rank -,001 ,000 -1,680 ,096 Own Homefield Advantage ,675 ,221 3,052 ,003
  • 14. REGRESSION MODEL #2 Model Coefficients t p B Std. Error Attacker– Defender (based on Fifa form) ,033 ,010 3,337 ,001 Own attacker– Own defender (InStat) ,011 ,002 4,653 ,000 Own homefield advantage ,850 ,227 3,754 ,000
  • 15. THE EXPLANATORY POWER OF THE REGRESSION MODELS R - multiple correlation coefficient R2 - multiple determination coefficient Model #1 R R Square Adjusted R Square ,717 ,515 ,493 Model 2# R R Square Adjusted R Square ,678 ,459 ,440
  • 16. TESTING THE RESULTS OF THE MODELS n=58 matches  Prediction of the outcomes  Model #1 56,9% (33/58)  Model #2 62,1% (36/58)  Preditction of the number of scored goals  Model #1 33,6% (39/116)  Model #2 31,0% (36/116)
  • 17. HITS Match Result Estimated Result Greece– Bosnia 0-0 0-0 Bosnia – Slovakia 0-1 0-1 Ukraine– England 0-0 0-0 Greece– Slovakia 1-0 1-0 France– Spain 0-1 0-1 Portugal– Sweden 1-0 1-0 Croatia– Island 2-0 2-0 Switzerland– Slovenia 1-0 1-0
  • 18. SOME OUTCOME HITTED MATCHES Match Result Estimated Result Bosnia-Greece 3-1 1-0 Romania-Greece 1-1 0-0 Austria-Germany 1-2 0-1 Sweden-Austria 2-1 1-0 Island-Slovenia 2-4 0-1 Italy-Denmark 3-1 2-0 Denmark-Italy 2-2 0-0
  • 19. COULD HUNGARY… QUALIFIY TO EC2016 ? sequence match w d l score goals receiv ed poin ts 1. ROM 10 7 2 1 10 2 23 2. NIR 10 5 3 2 9 7 18 3. HUN 10 4 4 2 8 6 16 4. GRE 10 3 3 4 4 6 12 5. FIN 10 3 2 5 7 9 11 Already played matches Estimated result Qualify to EC2016 Remount-qualifier HUN ROM GRE NIR FIN HUN - 1-0 0-0 1-2 1-0 ROM 1-1 - 1-0 2-0 1-0 GRE 1-0 0-1 - 0-2 1-0 NIR 1-1 0-0 0-0 - 2-1 FIN 1-1 0-2 1-1 2-0 -
  • 20. THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION! Jámbor Bence – Szabó Dávid – Jámbor Máté