SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
REISSUE
APRIL 2003
MORNING – AFTERNOON
11. ANSWER:(E) is the most correctanswer.(A) and(C) can be correctedby a certificate of Correction.
MPEP § 1481. (D) can be correctedby a Certificate of Correction.37CFR § 1.324; MPEP § 1481. (B) is
incorrect.Sucha mistake,whichaffectsthe scope andmeaningof the claimsinapatent,isnot
consideredtobe of the “minor” characterrequiredforissuance of a Certificate of Correction.MPEP§
1481.
13. ANSWER:(C) isthe mostcorrect. See MPEP § 1412.02, Recapture.Asto(A),recapture occurswhen
the claimis broadened.Addingalimitationwouldnarrow the claim.Asto(B),recapture doesnotapply
to continuations.Asto(D),the two-yeardate relatestobroadeningreissue applications,nottothe issue
of recapture.35 U.S.C. 251 prescribesa2-yearlimitforfilingapplicationsforbroadeningreissues:“No
reissue patentshall be grantedenlargingthe scope of the original patentunlessappliedforwithintwo
yearsfrom the grant of the original patent.”(E) isincorrectbecause a(C) iscorrect.
6. ANSWER: (C) isthe most correct answer.See MPEP§ 1411.01. Asto (A) see MPEP § 1402. A reissue
patentisnot granted.Asto (B),newmattermay not be enteredinareissue.Asto(D) see MPEP §
1412.03. Since (A),and(B) are incorrect,(E) is incorrect.
14. ANSWER:(C) isthe mostcorrect answer.Answers(A),(D) and(E) are incorrectbecause a broadening
reissue applicationmustbe filedwithintwoyearsof issuance of the original patent.35 U.S.C.§ 251;
MPEP § 1412.03. Answer(B) isincorrectbecause the assignee maynotfile abroadeningreissue
application.MPEP§ 706.03(x).
OCTOBER 2003
MORNING – AFTERNOON
16. ANSWER:(A) isthe most correct answer.35 U.S.C. § 251, MPEP § 1402 (fifth paragraph).MPEP§
1402 statesthat one of the “mostcommonbasesfor filingareissue application[is] (A) the claimsare
too narrowor too broad.” The claimsmay be broadenedinareissue applicationfiledbythe inventor
withintwoyearsfromthe patentissue date.(B) isincorrectsince the 4th paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 251
statesthat no reissuedpatentshallbe grantedenlargingthe scope of the clamsof the original patent
unlessappliedforwithintwoyearsfromthe grantof the original patent.(C) and(E) are incorrect.MPEP
§ 1402, sixteenthparagraph.Anapplicant’sfailuretotimelyfile adivisionalapplicationwhilethe original
applicationisstill pendingisnotconsideredtobe anerror correctable viareissue.See Inre Orita,550
F.2d 1277, 1280, 193 USPQ 145, 148 (CCPA 1977). (D) isincorrect.MPEP § 201.06. Inorder to claim
benefitunder35U.S.C. § 120 to a parentapplication,adivisional applicationmustbe filedwhilethe
parentpatentapplicationisstill pending.
2. ANSWER: (D) isthe mostcorrect answer.MPEP§§ 1403 and 1412.03, underthe heading“WhenA
BroadenedClaimCanBe Presented.”A broadeningreissue claimmustbe filedwithinthe twoyearsfrom
the grant of the original patent.(D) isthe mostcorrect and the examiner shouldexaminethe case asany
otherapplicationandaddressappropriate issuesconcerningreissue examination.See Switzerv.
Sockman,333 F.2d 935, 142 USPQ 226 (CCPA 1964) (a similarrule ininterferences).Since applicantfiled
the amendmentbyExpressMail,the amendmentistreatedasbeingfiledwiththe USPTOonthe date of
depositwiththe USPostal Service.Therefore,(A),(B) and(C) are incorrectanswers.A reissue
applicationcanbe granteda filingdate withoutanoathor declaration,orwithoutthe filingfeebeing
present.See 37 CFR § 1.53(f). Applicantwillbe givenaperiodof time toprovide the missingpartsandto
pay the surcharge under37 CFR § 1.16(e).See MPEP § 1410.01. Choice (E) isnot correct since the mere
deletionof anelementof aclaimdoesnot automaticallyraise agroundof rejectionbasedonthe
recapture doctrine.See MPEP§ 1412.02.
11. ANSWER:(E) is the most correctanswer.35 U.S.C.§ 251; 37 CFR § 1.53(f); MPEP § 1403. Filinga
broadenedreissueapplicationwithatleastone broadeningclaimpriortothe expirationof the two-year
time periodsetinthe statute satisfiesthe diligenceprovisionsof 35U.S.C. § 251. The executedreissue
oath/declarationandthe filingfee maybe filedata latertime.AccordingtoMPEP § 1403, a reissue
applicationcanbe granteda filingdate withoutanoathor declaration,orwithoutthe filingfeebeing
present.See 37 CFR § 1.53(f). The reissue applicantwill be givenaperiodof time toprovide the missing
parts and to paythe surcharge under37 CFR § 1.16(e).See MPEP § 1410.01. (A),(B) and (D) are clearly
incorrectsince the inventorsandassignee wouldbe barredfromabroadeningreissueif filedafterthe
twoyear periodsetinthe statute.(C) isincorrectsince the reissue applicationwasfiledwithoutatleast
one broadeningclaimpriortothe expirationof the two-yeartime periodsetin35 U.S.C.§ 251.

More Related Content

Similar to Reissue 1400 answers

SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014
SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014
SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014
Katrina Swanson
 
Cigna Corp. v. Amara Revisited
Cigna Corp. v. Amara RevisitedCigna Corp. v. Amara Revisited
Cigna Corp. v. Amara Revisited
Rachel Hamilton
 
Coleman v milwaukee bd of school
Coleman v milwaukee bd of schoolColeman v milwaukee bd of school
Coleman v milwaukee bd of school
Brian Bateman
 
Mc clanahan v. commissioner
Mc clanahan v. commissionerMc clanahan v. commissioner
Mc clanahan v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
WorkCover Case Review 2015 RJA
WorkCover Case Review 2015 RJAWorkCover Case Review 2015 RJA
WorkCover Case Review 2015 RJA
Rohan Armstrong
 

Similar to Reissue 1400 answers (20)

2003apr15ans
2003apr15ans2003apr15ans
2003apr15ans
 
Appeal 1200 answers
Appeal 1200 answersAppeal 1200 answers
Appeal 1200 answers
 
SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014
SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014
SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014
 
Cigna Corp. v. Amara Revisited
Cigna Corp. v. Amara RevisitedCigna Corp. v. Amara Revisited
Cigna Corp. v. Amara Revisited
 
Reissue 1400 questions
Reissue 1400 questionsReissue 1400 questions
Reissue 1400 questions
 
2003 oct15ans
2003 oct15ans2003 oct15ans
2003 oct15ans
 
Ca2 db241675 01
Ca2 db241675 01Ca2 db241675 01
Ca2 db241675 01
 
Automatically Denormalizing Document Relationships
Automatically Denormalizing Document RelationshipsAutomatically Denormalizing Document Relationships
Automatically Denormalizing Document Relationships
 
Coleman v milwaukee bd of school
Coleman v milwaukee bd of schoolColeman v milwaukee bd of school
Coleman v milwaukee bd of school
 
writing sample opening brief quick
writing sample opening brief quickwriting sample opening brief quick
writing sample opening brief quick
 
Letter Decision Resolving Defendants' Motion For Leave To Amend .pdf
Letter Decision Resolving Defendants' Motion For Leave To Amend .pdfLetter Decision Resolving Defendants' Motion For Leave To Amend .pdf
Letter Decision Resolving Defendants' Motion For Leave To Amend .pdf
 
Patent Troll - Big Websites Sued For Using HTTPS Encryption
Patent Troll - Big Websites Sued For Using HTTPS EncryptionPatent Troll - Big Websites Sued For Using HTTPS Encryption
Patent Troll - Big Websites Sued For Using HTTPS Encryption
 
Stem OPT Extension Judge Decision - Jan 23, 2016
Stem OPT Extension Judge Decision - Jan 23, 2016Stem OPT Extension Judge Decision - Jan 23, 2016
Stem OPT Extension Judge Decision - Jan 23, 2016
 
Vargas v. Ford - denying appeal bond to Public Citizen
Vargas v. Ford - denying appeal bond to Public CitizenVargas v. Ford - denying appeal bond to Public Citizen
Vargas v. Ford - denying appeal bond to Public Citizen
 
Mc clanahan v. commissioner
Mc clanahan v. commissionerMc clanahan v. commissioner
Mc clanahan v. commissioner
 
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdf
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdfScott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdf
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdf
 
WorkCover Case Review 2015 RJA
WorkCover Case Review 2015 RJAWorkCover Case Review 2015 RJA
WorkCover Case Review 2015 RJA
 
Plaintiff’S Prima Facie Case
Plaintiff’S Prima Facie CasePlaintiff’S Prima Facie Case
Plaintiff’S Prima Facie Case
 
AMEC v. VDOT Opinion 2008 - Justin Ayars
AMEC v. VDOT Opinion 2008 - Justin AyarsAMEC v. VDOT Opinion 2008 - Justin Ayars
AMEC v. VDOT Opinion 2008 - Justin Ayars
 
'Madhavi Vuppalpati & Anandhan Jayaraman defeated in their attempt to derail ...
'Madhavi Vuppalpati & Anandhan Jayaraman defeated in their attempt to derail ...'Madhavi Vuppalpati & Anandhan Jayaraman defeated in their attempt to derail ...
'Madhavi Vuppalpati & Anandhan Jayaraman defeated in their attempt to derail ...
 

Recently uploaded

Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...
Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...
Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...
Call Girls In Delhi Whatsup 9873940964 Enjoy Unlimited Pleasure
 
一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
 一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书 一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
SS A
 
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAudience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
MollyBrown86
 
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdfAppeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
PoojaGadiya1
 
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
bd2c5966a56d
 
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
ShashankKumar441258
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptxMunicipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
 
Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...
Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...
Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...
 
Smarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation Strategy
Smarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation StrategySmarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation Strategy
Smarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation Strategy
 
一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
 一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书 一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
 
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxPPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
 
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction FailsCAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
 
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdf
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdfBPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdf
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdf
 
Presentation on Corporate SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY- PPT.pptx
Presentation on Corporate SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY- PPT.pptxPresentation on Corporate SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY- PPT.pptx
Presentation on Corporate SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY- PPT.pptx
 
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptxMOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
 
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAudience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
pnp FIRST-RESPONDER-IN-CRIME-SCENEs.pptx
pnp FIRST-RESPONDER-IN-CRIME-SCENEs.pptxpnp FIRST-RESPONDER-IN-CRIME-SCENEs.pptx
pnp FIRST-RESPONDER-IN-CRIME-SCENEs.pptx
 
How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...
How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...
How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...
 
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdfAppeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
 
Analysis of R V Kelkar's Criminal Procedure Code ppt- chapter 1 .pptx
Analysis of R V Kelkar's Criminal Procedure Code ppt- chapter 1 .pptxAnalysis of R V Kelkar's Criminal Procedure Code ppt- chapter 1 .pptx
Analysis of R V Kelkar's Criminal Procedure Code ppt- chapter 1 .pptx
 
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULELITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
 
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
 
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
 
Chp 1- Contract and its kinds-business law .ppt
Chp 1- Contract and its kinds-business law .pptChp 1- Contract and its kinds-business law .ppt
Chp 1- Contract and its kinds-business law .ppt
 
Doctrine of Part-Performance.ddddddddddppt
Doctrine of Part-Performance.ddddddddddpptDoctrine of Part-Performance.ddddddddddppt
Doctrine of Part-Performance.ddddddddddppt
 
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
 

Reissue 1400 answers

  • 3. 11. ANSWER:(E) is the most correctanswer.(A) and(C) can be correctedby a certificate of Correction. MPEP § 1481. (D) can be correctedby a Certificate of Correction.37CFR § 1.324; MPEP § 1481. (B) is incorrect.Sucha mistake,whichaffectsthe scope andmeaningof the claimsinapatent,isnot consideredtobe of the “minor” characterrequiredforissuance of a Certificate of Correction.MPEP§ 1481.
  • 4. 13. ANSWER:(C) isthe mostcorrect. See MPEP § 1412.02, Recapture.Asto(A),recapture occurswhen the claimis broadened.Addingalimitationwouldnarrow the claim.Asto(B),recapture doesnotapply to continuations.Asto(D),the two-yeardate relatestobroadeningreissue applications,nottothe issue of recapture.35 U.S.C. 251 prescribesa2-yearlimitforfilingapplicationsforbroadeningreissues:“No reissue patentshall be grantedenlargingthe scope of the original patentunlessappliedforwithintwo yearsfrom the grant of the original patent.”(E) isincorrectbecause a(C) iscorrect.
  • 5. 6. ANSWER: (C) isthe most correct answer.See MPEP§ 1411.01. Asto (A) see MPEP § 1402. A reissue patentisnot granted.Asto (B),newmattermay not be enteredinareissue.Asto(D) see MPEP § 1412.03. Since (A),and(B) are incorrect,(E) is incorrect.
  • 6. 14. ANSWER:(C) isthe mostcorrect answer.Answers(A),(D) and(E) are incorrectbecause a broadening reissue applicationmustbe filedwithintwoyearsof issuance of the original patent.35 U.S.C.§ 251; MPEP § 1412.03. Answer(B) isincorrectbecause the assignee maynotfile abroadeningreissue application.MPEP§ 706.03(x).
  • 8. 16. ANSWER:(A) isthe most correct answer.35 U.S.C. § 251, MPEP § 1402 (fifth paragraph).MPEP§ 1402 statesthat one of the “mostcommonbasesfor filingareissue application[is] (A) the claimsare too narrowor too broad.” The claimsmay be broadenedinareissue applicationfiledbythe inventor withintwoyearsfromthe patentissue date.(B) isincorrectsince the 4th paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 251 statesthat no reissuedpatentshallbe grantedenlargingthe scope of the clamsof the original patent unlessappliedforwithintwoyearsfromthe grantof the original patent.(C) and(E) are incorrect.MPEP § 1402, sixteenthparagraph.Anapplicant’sfailuretotimelyfile adivisionalapplicationwhilethe original applicationisstill pendingisnotconsideredtobe anerror correctable viareissue.See Inre Orita,550 F.2d 1277, 1280, 193 USPQ 145, 148 (CCPA 1977). (D) isincorrect.MPEP § 201.06. Inorder to claim benefitunder35U.S.C. § 120 to a parentapplication,adivisional applicationmustbe filedwhilethe parentpatentapplicationisstill pending.
  • 9. 2. ANSWER: (D) isthe mostcorrect answer.MPEP§§ 1403 and 1412.03, underthe heading“WhenA BroadenedClaimCanBe Presented.”A broadeningreissue claimmustbe filedwithinthe twoyearsfrom the grant of the original patent.(D) isthe mostcorrect and the examiner shouldexaminethe case asany otherapplicationandaddressappropriate issuesconcerningreissue examination.See Switzerv. Sockman,333 F.2d 935, 142 USPQ 226 (CCPA 1964) (a similarrule ininterferences).Since applicantfiled the amendmentbyExpressMail,the amendmentistreatedasbeingfiledwiththe USPTOonthe date of depositwiththe USPostal Service.Therefore,(A),(B) and(C) are incorrectanswers.A reissue applicationcanbe granteda filingdate withoutanoathor declaration,orwithoutthe filingfeebeing present.See 37 CFR § 1.53(f). Applicantwillbe givenaperiodof time toprovide the missingpartsandto pay the surcharge under37 CFR § 1.16(e).See MPEP § 1410.01. Choice (E) isnot correct since the mere deletionof anelementof aclaimdoesnot automaticallyraise agroundof rejectionbasedonthe recapture doctrine.See MPEP§ 1412.02.
  • 10. 11. ANSWER:(E) is the most correctanswer.35 U.S.C.§ 251; 37 CFR § 1.53(f); MPEP § 1403. Filinga broadenedreissueapplicationwithatleastone broadeningclaimpriortothe expirationof the two-year time periodsetinthe statute satisfiesthe diligenceprovisionsof 35U.S.C. § 251. The executedreissue oath/declarationandthe filingfee maybe filedata latertime.AccordingtoMPEP § 1403, a reissue applicationcanbe granteda filingdate withoutanoathor declaration,orwithoutthe filingfeebeing present.See 37 CFR § 1.53(f). The reissue applicantwill be givenaperiodof time toprovide the missing parts and to paythe surcharge under37 CFR § 1.16(e).See MPEP § 1410.01. (A),(B) and (D) are clearly incorrectsince the inventorsandassignee wouldbe barredfromabroadeningreissueif filedafterthe twoyear periodsetinthe statute.(C) isincorrectsince the reissue applicationwasfiledwithoutatleast one broadeningclaimpriortothe expirationof the two-yeartime periodsetin35 U.S.C.§ 251.