2. Snapshot
comparison
Shakespeare Lincoln
Entrepreneur – wildly
successful – several
business partners in his
company
Attorney, politician,
President – one partner
in his law firm
Net worth at death = ?
– estimate is
L20 million+ in today’s
terms
Net worth at death =
$110,000
$1.6 million in today’s
terms
Wife – life-long partner
in building the family
fortunes
Wife – emotionally
unstable spendthrift
who was always cared
for
Children –
Susanna: intelligent,
well-off
Judith: made poor
choices
Children –
Robert: 23-year old
Harvard grad – now
head of the family
Tad: special needs
adolescent
Comprehensive estate
plan for family and
business
Died intestate
No non-probate estate
plans
Both Shakespeare and Lincoln had
reached the top of their professions
and had business partners.
Both Shakespeare and Lincoln had
substantial assets in their estates.
Both had family drama in their lives.
Do their stories sound like any
clients you know?
3. Estate Administration / Legacy
Shakespeare
Susanna / Dr. Hall - executors
Trust Protectors
The inventory and the second-best
bed
Orderly probate
What does Shakespeare’s “final word”
reveal?
Seeing the legacy today
Lincoln
David Davis – Supreme Court Justice
– appointed administrator
Everything divided equally between
wife and two sons
Wife’s 1/3 portion of chattel /
personal property
Probate took 2 ½ years
We will never know Lincoln’s final
word
4. Business Partners / Neighbors
Shakespeare
Personal bequests – status
Blackfriar’s – left to family, and rented
to the King’s Men – set up so that the
partners could eventually purchase
the property and theatre
Retirement / business succession plan
had already been in place for some
time
Real estate in and around Stratford-
Upon-Avon / Warwickshire
Lincoln
Left William Herndon with no way to
buy out Lincoln’s interest in the
practice
$250 fee for services rendered to
clients before 1861
Family left without a source of
income from his business interests
A few real estate investments in
Illinois
Lincoln’s financial advisor had died in
February 1865
5. Family – the central cell of society
Shakespeare
Protected and provided for
Wife had a home and income
for her lifetime
Daughter Judith’s “marriage
portion” and the rest of the
family fortune was safe
Secure income stream in
perpetuity
Entail to continue property
ownership(wealth) - intended
to last for future generations
Lincoln
Vulnerable and burdened
Family home was sold, Mary
moved into a hotel / boarding
house in Springfield
Mary was institutionalized on
occasion, Robert bore the
burden of those expenses
Assets distributed to each
beneficiary outright – no
creditor protection /
spendthrift protection
Chaos and disintegration of the
family
6. What does it mean for us?
Same issues
Estate planning for Death and Diminished Capacity
Grantor / Surviving Spouse
Family – treating children equitably v. equally
Business partners
Lifetime & legacy gifting (family, charitable)
Many advisors and partners around the table –
coordinated action on behalf of a client / donor
Revealing conversations – story listening
Don’t get caught up in the mechanics too early
7. Family owned/controlled businesses
Family members who are employees / owners
Family members who are not employees /
owners
Non-family members who are key employees /
owners
Providing a stream of income from the business
for survivors
Using philanthropy and business succession
planning to achieve multiple goals
Converting the business into a multi-
generational legacy for the entire family like
Shakespeare did
“Every business can benefit from including
philanthropy in the business plan”
9. “I already have an estate plan . . . “
Immediacy – date that Shakespeare executed will
Things change
Family situation, Laws
Assets
Family home / Vacation home
Business / retirement
appreciation
Nomination of executors, trustees
Will the estate plan achieve what the client really wants?
Is the plan complete? Do all the documents and designations coordinate?
Clarity in the documents - proper transfer of assets, distribution of income,
discretion – airtight to avoid failure of trust or litigation from heirs
Will the philanthropic institutions accept the gifts and agree to use them as the
client wants?
10. New Paradigm – beyond the estate-tax
motivation
Re-evaluate current plans
Benefits of Trusts
for Grantors/ Surviving Spouses
for Beneficiaries
Don’t necessarily eliminate life insurance / ILITs
Especially if there is agricultural land / business
Especially if there is charitable intent
Small and medium sized estates
Account for appreciation
Generation skipping-style techniques
Consider keeping bypass trusts in place
QTIP provisions
11. Charitable Planning / Stewardship
Demographics
Baby Boomers: $ / Volunteer
The follow-up generations
Lower incomes
Lower savings levels
Tithing
Support now
Endowed support for later
Nonprofit boards
Elevating the discourse