SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 24
Download to read offline
DEBT MORTALITY
MARKOV ANALYSIS OF MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS
Final Project
MAC5116 - Stochastic Processes
Summer 2010
Kevin McLaughlin
OUTLINE
 Balance Sheet 101
 Credit Ratings
 Markov Analysis
 Moody’s Migration Table
 Investment Quality
 Canonical Form for Migration Table
 Fundamental Matrix
 Time Spent in Transient States
 Probability of Transition and Absorption
 Case Studies
 Discussion
 Appendix
BALANCE SHEET 101
 At it’s core, a business can be described by a few basic
components
 Assets
 Tangible items like property, plant, and equipment
 Intangibles like patents, copyrights, and branding
 Liabilities
 Current (due in 12 mo), money to suppliers, payroll, …
 Long term Debt (Bonds, convertibles, & commercial paper)
 Shareholder’s Equity
 Equity = Assets – Liabilities
 What’s left of the assets after paying all liabilities
 Assets of a company can be funded by debt OR equity
CREDIT RATINGS
 Few people realize the global equity, or stock, market
is dwarfed by the bond market
 Outstanding bond debt totaled roughly $82 trillion in 2008,
v. about $40 trillion in the stock markets
 Companies can survive large drops in equity, but they
generally don’t survive very long when they default
(miss payments) on their bond debts, file for
bankruptcy, or renegotiate loan terms
 Ratings agencies like Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s,
and Fitch provide convenient and useful measures of
a company’s financial health
MOODY’S RATING - THE SOUTHERN CO.
 The Southern Company, parent of Gulf Power, is rated A3,
which is great, but it looks like they may get downgraded
MARKOV ANALYSIS
MOODY’S LETTER RATINGS
 Below is a one-year migration table for Moody’s ratings
 Can be further distinguished with numbers (22 in total)
 Notice:
 Dominance of the diagonal
 Heavy weighting to the right of the diagonal
 Absorbing states, Default and Withdrawn Rating
 Equivalent to financial death
Average One-Year Letter Rating Migration Rates, 1970-2008
From/To Aaa Aa A Baa Ba B Caa Ca-C Default WR
Aaa 88.495 7.618 0.650 0.026 0.028 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.000 3.179
Aa 1.047 86.817 7.077 0.288 0.042 0.016 0.008 0.001 0.016 4.688
A 0.066 2.832 87.274 4.961 0.473 0.086 0.028 0.003 0.024 4.253
Baa 0.043 0.191 4.786 84.382 4.165 0.781 0.203 0.021 0.163 5.265
Ba 0.008 0.056 0.395 5.678 76.054 7.070 0.549 0.061 1.084 9.045
B 0.011 0.037 0.133 0.346 5.034 73.940 5.090 0.620 4.165 10.624
Caa 0.000 0.026 0.037 0.222 0.484 8.928 60.782 3.589 13.122 12.810
Ca-C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.331 2.790 9.446 39.479 30.033 17.921
Default 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 100.000 0.000
WR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 100.000
INVESTMENT QUALITY
 Total space of Letter Ratings
 These ratings can be partitioned into three levels of
investment quality
 Investment Grade
 Most mutual funds and other retirement-oriented funds are
only allowed to buy investment grade bonds
 High Yield (Speculative or Junk)
 Only aggressive investors buy this type of debt
 Most likely to be mispriced due to market inefficiencies
 Default or Withdrawn Rating












 CCaCaa,B,Ba,HY,BaaA,Aa,Aaa,IG






 WRDefault,C,CaCaa,B,Ba,Baa,A,Aa,Aaa,S
CANONICAL FORM FOR MIGRATION TABLE
 Transient block




























39.4799.4462.7900.3310.0000.0000.0000.000
3.58960.7828.9280.4840.2220.0370.0260.000
0.6205.09073.9405.0340.3460.1330.0370.011
1.0610.5497.07076.0545.6780.3950.0560.008
0.0210.2030.7814.16584.3824.7860.1910.043
0.0030.0280.0860.4734.96187.2742.8320.066
0.0010.0080.0160.0420.2887.07786.8171.047
0.0000.0020.0020.0280.0260.6507.61888.495
CCa
Caa
B
Ba
Baa
A
Aa
Aaa
CCaCaaBBaBaaAAaAaaQ
 Recurrent block




























17.92130.033
12.81013.122
10.6244.165
9.0451.084
5.2650.163
4.2530.024
4.6880.016
3.1790.000
CCa
Caa
B
Ba
Baa
A
Aa
Aaa
WRDefaultR
FUNDAMENTAL MATRIX (I-Q)-1




























1.6830.4560.3720.1250.0750.0460.0150.002
0.1732.7331.0490.3200.2240.1390.0470.007
0.0820.6034.3551.0420.6050.3740.1190.020
0.0380.2851.5034.9062.2061.1920.3430.051
0.0230.1750.7771.6758.2353.7301.0150.146
0.0140.1040.4560.9843.83910.7742.5550.310
0.0090.0670.2900.6202.3946.2479.4910.909
0.0070.0520.2240.4821.8264.7576.4329.312
CCa
Caa
B
Ba
Baa
A
Aa
Aaa
CCaCaaBBaBaaAAaAaaQ)-(I -1
8
1j
1-
ij
Q)-(I

 Entry is the expected number of visits to transient state
j before the process reaches an absorbing state
 is the expected number of steps before absorption
1-
ij
Q)-(I
TIME SPENT IN TRANSIENT STATES
 Companies rated Aaa are expected to remain so for
9.312 years, while they can be expected to spend
0.482 years as speculative Ba
 Notice the dominance of the diagonal
 Tendency to remain at current rating




























1.6830.4560.3720.1250.0750.0460.0150.002
0.1732.7331.0490.3200.2240.1390.0470.007
0.0820.6034.3551.0420.6050.3740.1190.020
0.0380.2851.5034.9062.2061.1920.3430.051
0.0230.1750.7771.6758.2353.7301.0150.146
0.0140.1040.4560.9843.83910.7742.5550.310
0.0090.0670.2900.6202.3946.2479.4910.909
0.0070.0520.2240.4821.8264.7576.4329.312
CCa
Caa
B
Ba
Baa
A
Aa
Aaa
CCaCaaBBaBaaAAaAaaQ)-(I -1
TIME UNTIL ABSORPTION
 Row sum equals the expected number of years spent as
Investment Grade and High Yield entities
 After that, the only remaining states are Default and
Withdrawn Rating
 The better the current rating, the longer you can expect
a company’s debt to provide you with income
 It seems reasonable to invest in Investment Grade debt
with 15-20 year maturities. Similarly, you probably
shouldn’t invest in High Yield debt with maturities greater
than 10 years
,
CCa
Caa
B
Ba
Baa
A
Aa
Aaa
CCaCaaBBaBaaAAaAaaQ)-(I -1




























1.6830.4560.3720.1250.0750.0460.0150.002
0.1732.7331.0490.3200.2240.1390.0470.007
0.0820.6034.3551.0420.6050.3740.1190.020
0.0380.2851.5034.9062.2061.1920.3430.051
0.0230.1750.7771.6758.2353.7301.0150.146
0.0140.1040.4560.9843.83910.7742.5550.310
0.0090.0670.2900.6202.3946.2479.4910.909
0.0070.0520.2240.4821.8264.7576.4329.312


























 2.774
4.693
7.198
10.525
15.776
19.036
20.028
23.092
CCa
Caa
B
Ba
Baa
A
Aa
Aaa
Years
PROBABILITY OF TRANSIENT STATE J
 The off-diagonal entries represent the probability
of EVER going from rating i to j
 Diagonal entries represent the probability of
returning to rating i given that it started with
rating i
 Let F = (I-Q)-1, => (F-I) X diag(F)-1
,
CCa
Caa
B
Ba
Baa
A
Aa
Aaa
CCaCaaBBaBaaAAaAaa)Q)-diag((II)-Q)-((I -1-1-1




























40.59416.6828.5592.5430.9090.4220.1550.025
10.29263.41624.0906.5202.7151.2940.4950.077
4.85022.05477.03621.2297.3433.4711.2490.216
2.26310.43734.51979.61826.78911.0633.6160.549
1.3726.41417.83834.14387.85734.61610.6911.572
0.8183.82010.47920.04846.61890.71826.9173.327
0.5282.4646.67112.63729.06857.98689.4649.764
0.4071.9095.1559.82622.17444.15167.76989.261
ABSORPTION PROBABILITIES
 The probability of being downgraded to one of the two
absorbing ratings, given the transient rating on the left
 Row sums equal unity
 Withdrawal of rating is the most likely scenario
 Considered a neutral way of retiring debt
 Default risk is drastically more significant for High
Yield rated debt
 Debt default is negative for all parties and loss of
investment ensues




























41.76058.240
54.17245.828
70.26329.737
83.14016.860
90.5069.494
94.3255.675
96.2753.725
97.1372.863
CCa
Caa
B
Ba
Baa
A
Aa
Aaa
WRDefaultRQ)-(I -1
CASE STUDIES
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.
 Run by Warren Buffet, CEO & Chairman, and
Charlie Munger, Vice Chairman
 Initially rated Aaa in June of 2001 on $700 million
of shelf debt, which was later used to finance the
purchase of Executive Jet Inc. (NetJets®)
 Long-term debt rated Aaa in April 2006
 Recently downgraded to Aa in April 2009
 Buffet’s age, 79, was significant to rating action
 89.3% chance of ever regaining Aaa rating
 3.7% chance of defaulting
 Outstanding debt expected to last 20 years
 Longest dated debt, $1.7B @ 3.2%, matures in 2015
GULF POWER COMPANY
 Current Rating is A (since at least 1995)
 On watch for potential downgrade, as well as
Georgia Power Co., and Mississippi Power Co.
 Lower revenues due to the recession (Surprise!)
 Lower revenues due to economic impact of BP oil spill
 High Capital Expenditures for environmental
compliance over the next several years
 FL regulators have not allowed utilities to charge
customers rates that produce expected returns
 90.7% chance of regaining A rating if downgraded
 5.7% chance of defaulting
 Outstanding debt expected to last 19 years
 Longest dated debt, $35M @ 5.875%, in 2044
NEW ALBERTSON’S, INC.
 My first employer (W. 9 Mile & Pine Forest Rd)
 Current Rating is Ba
 Aa in May 1992
 Withdrawn rating in May 1995
 Aa in Jun 1995
 A in Mar 1999, downgrade
 Baa in Jan 2001, downgrade
 Ba in April 2006, downgrade
 B in May 2006, downgrade
 Ba Jan 2009, upgrade
 High Yield (Junk) status
 16.9% chance of defaulting
 Outstanding debt expected to last 10.5 years (or 7.2
years to be conservative)
 Longest dated debt, $225M @ 8.7%, in 2030
BRITISH PETROLEUM P.L.C.
 Recently downgraded to A from Aa
 A in May 1995
 Aa in Nov 1995, upgrade
 A in Jun 2010, downgrade
 Still Investment Grade
 Risk of default increased to 5.7% from 3.7%
 Outstanding debt expected to last 19 years
 Initially rated as A. The probability of ever being
upgraded to Aa was 27%. Probability of returning
to A was 91%. 47% chance of Baa rating (still
investment grade)
DISCUSSION
 Two important safety criteria for debt investors are time
horizon and low default risk. Markov analysis shows the
usefulness of Moody’s rating system for categorizing
investments by these two criteria
 Considering the expected time-to-absorption for
Investment Grade debt is longer than 15 years, it makes
sense for retirement oriented investment funds to stick
with these types of debt securities
 Similarly, due to their relatively short life spans, and
high default rates, High Yield investments SHOULD be
limited to more discretionary funds with greater
appetite for risk
APPENDIX
PROFILE OF NEW DEBT ISSUERS
Issuers by Debt Rating Issuers By IG
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
Aaa Aa A
Baa Ba B
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
Invest Grade Spec Grade
REASONS FOR DEFAULT
 Moody’s definition of default includes three types of
credit events
 A missed or delayed disbursement of interest and/or
principal
 Bankruptcy, administration, legal receivership, or other
legal blocks (perhaps by regulators) to the timely payment
of interest and/or principal
 A distressed exchange occurs where: (i) the issuer offers
debt holders a new security or package of securities that
amount to a diminished financial obligation (such as
preferred or common stock, or debt with a lower coupon or
par amount, lower seniority, or longer maturity); and (ii)
the exchange has the effect of allowing the issuer to avoid a
bankruptcy or payment default
 Taken from “Corporate Default and Recovery Rates,
1920-2008,” February 2009
REASONS FOR WITHDRAWAL OF RATINGS
 A withdrawn rating signifies the removal of a rating on either an obligation or an
issuer. Withdrawn ratings reflect Moody's current view of the credit at the time
of withdrawal
 Inadequate information
 Any rating may be withdrawn if, in Moody's opinion, there is insufficient information to
assess effectively the creditworthiness of the issuer or obligation. This would typically
hold in situations where the issuer declines to provide information requested by Moody's
and Moody's cannot otherwise attain the requested information through public channels
 Bankruptcy/Reorganization/Liquidation
 If the issuer defaults, enters bankruptcy/reorganization or is liquidated, it may no longer
be useful or necessary for Moody's to maintain a rating on the issuer or the issuer's
obligations
 Business Reasons
 Under certain circumstances, Moody's will withdraw a rating for an issuer or an
obligation for reasons unrelated to the adequacy of information, or bankruptcy or
reorganization status of the credit. When this occurs, Moody's will balance the market
need for a rating against the resources required to maintain and monitor a rating
 Maturity of obligation
 An obligation rating will be withdrawn when the rated obligation is no longer
outstanding. In practice, the vast majority of WR actions arise from routine debt
maturities, calls, or redemptions
 Taken from “Moody’s Guidelines for the Withdrawal of Ratings.” January 2004

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

How to analyze how much to borrow from your banker
How to analyze how much to borrow from your bankerHow to analyze how much to borrow from your banker
How to analyze how much to borrow from your bankerFuturum2
 
BROSHURE JAZZ IN ALBANIA2
BROSHURE JAZZ IN ALBANIA2BROSHURE JAZZ IN ALBANIA2
BROSHURE JAZZ IN ALBANIA2Marvin Petrela
 
강남오피.강남오피≒다솜넷≒대전오피걸.선릉역오피방
강남오피.강남오피≒다솜넷≒대전오피걸.선릉역오피방강남오피.강남오피≒다솜넷≒대전오피걸.선릉역오피방
강남오피.강남오피≒다솜넷≒대전오피걸.선릉역오피방dasom0040
 
7.project costmanagement
7.project costmanagement7.project costmanagement
7.project costmanagementNiranjana K.R.
 
Extending the Depth of Coverage in SWATH® Acquisition with Deeper Ion Libraries
Extending the Depth of Coverage in SWATH® Acquisition with Deeper Ion Libraries Extending the Depth of Coverage in SWATH® Acquisition with Deeper Ion Libraries
Extending the Depth of Coverage in SWATH® Acquisition with Deeper Ion Libraries SCIEX
 
Tavaramerkki. NYT! IPR-palveluihin uusi ulottuvuus
Tavaramerkki. NYT! IPR-palveluihin uusi ulottuvuusTavaramerkki. NYT! IPR-palveluihin uusi ulottuvuus
Tavaramerkki. NYT! IPR-palveluihin uusi ulottuvuusAnna Ronkainen
 
Transmission media on Client server and high speed network
Transmission media on Client server and high speed networkTransmission media on Client server and high speed network
Transmission media on Client server and high speed networkSatya P. Joshi
 
Derivatives of Capital marketsCcm derivatives videoshoot
Derivatives of Capital marketsCcm derivatives videoshootDerivatives of Capital marketsCcm derivatives videoshoot
Derivatives of Capital marketsCcm derivatives videoshootLearning Imarticus
 
All Features of SpotCam Cameras
All Features of SpotCam CamerasAll Features of SpotCam Cameras
All Features of SpotCam Camerasspotcam
 
The Problem(s) with Law
The Problem(s) with LawThe Problem(s) with Law
The Problem(s) with LawEvolve Law
 

Viewers also liked (12)

How to analyze how much to borrow from your banker
How to analyze how much to borrow from your bankerHow to analyze how much to borrow from your banker
How to analyze how much to borrow from your banker
 
BROSHURE JAZZ IN ALBANIA2
BROSHURE JAZZ IN ALBANIA2BROSHURE JAZZ IN ALBANIA2
BROSHURE JAZZ IN ALBANIA2
 
강남오피.강남오피≒다솜넷≒대전오피걸.선릉역오피방
강남오피.강남오피≒다솜넷≒대전오피걸.선릉역오피방강남오피.강남오피≒다솜넷≒대전오피걸.선릉역오피방
강남오피.강남오피≒다솜넷≒대전오피걸.선릉역오피방
 
Parcial
ParcialParcial
Parcial
 
7.project costmanagement
7.project costmanagement7.project costmanagement
7.project costmanagement
 
Extending the Depth of Coverage in SWATH® Acquisition with Deeper Ion Libraries
Extending the Depth of Coverage in SWATH® Acquisition with Deeper Ion Libraries Extending the Depth of Coverage in SWATH® Acquisition with Deeper Ion Libraries
Extending the Depth of Coverage in SWATH® Acquisition with Deeper Ion Libraries
 
Tavaramerkki. NYT! IPR-palveluihin uusi ulottuvuus
Tavaramerkki. NYT! IPR-palveluihin uusi ulottuvuusTavaramerkki. NYT! IPR-palveluihin uusi ulottuvuus
Tavaramerkki. NYT! IPR-palveluihin uusi ulottuvuus
 
Transmission media on Client server and high speed network
Transmission media on Client server and high speed networkTransmission media on Client server and high speed network
Transmission media on Client server and high speed network
 
Inductance and capacitance
 Inductance and capacitance Inductance and capacitance
Inductance and capacitance
 
Derivatives of Capital marketsCcm derivatives videoshoot
Derivatives of Capital marketsCcm derivatives videoshootDerivatives of Capital marketsCcm derivatives videoshoot
Derivatives of Capital marketsCcm derivatives videoshoot
 
All Features of SpotCam Cameras
All Features of SpotCam CamerasAll Features of SpotCam Cameras
All Features of SpotCam Cameras
 
The Problem(s) with Law
The Problem(s) with LawThe Problem(s) with Law
The Problem(s) with Law
 

Similar to Markov Analysis of Moodys Debt Ratings

Acquisition of Mercury Athletic
Acquisition of Mercury AthleticAcquisition of Mercury Athletic
Acquisition of Mercury AthleticJB Gough
 
Investment PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Investment PowerPoint Presentation SlidesInvestment PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Investment PowerPoint Presentation SlidesSlideTeam
 
Paragon Shipping Q2 2013 results presentation
Paragon Shipping Q2 2013 results presentationParagon Shipping Q2 2013 results presentation
Paragon Shipping Q2 2013 results presentationTradeWindsnews
 
The Asset Return - Funding Cost Paradox: The Case for LDI
The Asset Return - Funding Cost Paradox: The Case for LDIThe Asset Return - Funding Cost Paradox: The Case for LDI
The Asset Return - Funding Cost Paradox: The Case for LDINorman Ehrentreich
 
Aba 2019 assessing the buyer's shares (1)
Aba 2019 assessing the buyer's shares (1)Aba 2019 assessing the buyer's shares (1)
Aba 2019 assessing the buyer's shares (1)Mercer Capital
 
Am Best Call Presentation 1 16 09
Am Best Call Presentation 1 16 09Am Best Call Presentation 1 16 09
Am Best Call Presentation 1 16 09Davidgantman
 
VEREIT: Between A Rock And A Hard Place? - Featured on Seeking Alpha
VEREIT: Between A Rock And A Hard Place? - Featured on Seeking Alpha VEREIT: Between A Rock And A Hard Place? - Featured on Seeking Alpha
VEREIT: Between A Rock And A Hard Place? - Featured on Seeking Alpha Stanley Laman Group Ltd
 
Stock Pitch For Real Estate Powerpoint Presentation Ppt Slide Template
Stock Pitch For Real Estate Powerpoint Presentation Ppt Slide TemplateStock Pitch For Real Estate Powerpoint Presentation Ppt Slide Template
Stock Pitch For Real Estate Powerpoint Presentation Ppt Slide TemplateSlideTeam
 
Stock Pitch For Real Estate PowerPoint Presentation Ppt Slide Template
Stock Pitch For Real Estate PowerPoint Presentation Ppt Slide TemplateStock Pitch For Real Estate PowerPoint Presentation Ppt Slide Template
Stock Pitch For Real Estate PowerPoint Presentation Ppt Slide TemplateSlideTeam
 
Mercer Capital's Asset Management Industry Newsletter | Q2 2013 | Focus: Trad...
Mercer Capital's Asset Management Industry Newsletter | Q2 2013 | Focus: Trad...Mercer Capital's Asset Management Industry Newsletter | Q2 2013 | Focus: Trad...
Mercer Capital's Asset Management Industry Newsletter | Q2 2013 | Focus: Trad...Mercer Capital
 
2007 apimec presentation
2007 apimec presentation2007 apimec presentation
2007 apimec presentationBancoABCRI
 
Aerospace, Defense and Government Services Monthly Market Overview
Aerospace, Defense and Government Services Monthly Market OverviewAerospace, Defense and Government Services Monthly Market Overview
Aerospace, Defense and Government Services Monthly Market OverviewMichael Papazis
 
Scott-Macon Aerospace & Defense (December 2019)
Scott-Macon Aerospace & Defense (December 2019)Scott-Macon Aerospace & Defense (December 2019)
Scott-Macon Aerospace & Defense (December 2019)Michael Papazis
 
xcel energy 12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
xcel energy  12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006xcel energy  12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
xcel energy 12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006finance26
 
xcel energy 12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
xcel energy  12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006xcel energy  12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
xcel energy 12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006finance26
 
xcel energy 12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
xcel energy  12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006xcel energy  12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
xcel energy 12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006finance26
 
Carfinco investor presentation
Carfinco investor presentationCarfinco investor presentation
Carfinco investor presentationCompany Spotlight
 
CMBS Loan Restructures: Reach the Summit!
CMBS Loan Restructures: Reach the Summit!CMBS Loan Restructures: Reach the Summit!
CMBS Loan Restructures: Reach the Summit!Virtual ULI
 
Australian Engineering Contracting & Services Weekly Research Report - Editio...
Australian Engineering Contracting & Services Weekly Research Report - Editio...Australian Engineering Contracting & Services Weekly Research Report - Editio...
Australian Engineering Contracting & Services Weekly Research Report - Editio...LCC Asia Pacific Corporate Finance
 

Similar to Markov Analysis of Moodys Debt Ratings (20)

Acquisition of Mercury Athletic
Acquisition of Mercury AthleticAcquisition of Mercury Athletic
Acquisition of Mercury Athletic
 
Investment PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Investment PowerPoint Presentation SlidesInvestment PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Investment PowerPoint Presentation Slides
 
Paragon Shipping Q2 2013 results presentation
Paragon Shipping Q2 2013 results presentationParagon Shipping Q2 2013 results presentation
Paragon Shipping Q2 2013 results presentation
 
The Asset Return - Funding Cost Paradox: The Case for LDI
The Asset Return - Funding Cost Paradox: The Case for LDIThe Asset Return - Funding Cost Paradox: The Case for LDI
The Asset Return - Funding Cost Paradox: The Case for LDI
 
Aba 2019 assessing the buyer's shares (1)
Aba 2019 assessing the buyer's shares (1)Aba 2019 assessing the buyer's shares (1)
Aba 2019 assessing the buyer's shares (1)
 
Am Best Call Presentation 1 16 09
Am Best Call Presentation 1 16 09Am Best Call Presentation 1 16 09
Am Best Call Presentation 1 16 09
 
VEREIT: Between A Rock And A Hard Place? - Featured on Seeking Alpha
VEREIT: Between A Rock And A Hard Place? - Featured on Seeking Alpha VEREIT: Between A Rock And A Hard Place? - Featured on Seeking Alpha
VEREIT: Between A Rock And A Hard Place? - Featured on Seeking Alpha
 
Stock Pitch For Real Estate Powerpoint Presentation Ppt Slide Template
Stock Pitch For Real Estate Powerpoint Presentation Ppt Slide TemplateStock Pitch For Real Estate Powerpoint Presentation Ppt Slide Template
Stock Pitch For Real Estate Powerpoint Presentation Ppt Slide Template
 
Stock Pitch For Real Estate PowerPoint Presentation Ppt Slide Template
Stock Pitch For Real Estate PowerPoint Presentation Ppt Slide TemplateStock Pitch For Real Estate PowerPoint Presentation Ppt Slide Template
Stock Pitch For Real Estate PowerPoint Presentation Ppt Slide Template
 
Mercer Capital's Asset Management Industry Newsletter | Q2 2013 | Focus: Trad...
Mercer Capital's Asset Management Industry Newsletter | Q2 2013 | Focus: Trad...Mercer Capital's Asset Management Industry Newsletter | Q2 2013 | Focus: Trad...
Mercer Capital's Asset Management Industry Newsletter | Q2 2013 | Focus: Trad...
 
2007 apimec presentation
2007 apimec presentation2007 apimec presentation
2007 apimec presentation
 
Aerospace, Defense and Government Services Monthly Market Overview
Aerospace, Defense and Government Services Monthly Market OverviewAerospace, Defense and Government Services Monthly Market Overview
Aerospace, Defense and Government Services Monthly Market Overview
 
Scott-Macon Aerospace & Defense (December 2019)
Scott-Macon Aerospace & Defense (December 2019)Scott-Macon Aerospace & Defense (December 2019)
Scott-Macon Aerospace & Defense (December 2019)
 
xcel energy 12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
xcel energy  12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006xcel energy  12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
xcel energy 12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
 
xcel energy 12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
xcel energy  12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006xcel energy  12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
xcel energy 12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
 
xcel energy 12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
xcel energy  12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006xcel energy  12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
xcel energy 12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006
 
Carfinco investor presentation
Carfinco investor presentationCarfinco investor presentation
Carfinco investor presentation
 
CMBS Loan Restructures: Reach the Summit!
CMBS Loan Restructures: Reach the Summit!CMBS Loan Restructures: Reach the Summit!
CMBS Loan Restructures: Reach the Summit!
 
Australian Engineering Contracting & Services Weekly Research Report - Editio...
Australian Engineering Contracting & Services Weekly Research Report - Editio...Australian Engineering Contracting & Services Weekly Research Report - Editio...
Australian Engineering Contracting & Services Weekly Research Report - Editio...
 
XEL_111506
XEL_111506XEL_111506
XEL_111506
 

Markov Analysis of Moodys Debt Ratings

  • 1. DEBT MORTALITY MARKOV ANALYSIS OF MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS Final Project MAC5116 - Stochastic Processes Summer 2010 Kevin McLaughlin
  • 2. OUTLINE  Balance Sheet 101  Credit Ratings  Markov Analysis  Moody’s Migration Table  Investment Quality  Canonical Form for Migration Table  Fundamental Matrix  Time Spent in Transient States  Probability of Transition and Absorption  Case Studies  Discussion  Appendix
  • 3. BALANCE SHEET 101  At it’s core, a business can be described by a few basic components  Assets  Tangible items like property, plant, and equipment  Intangibles like patents, copyrights, and branding  Liabilities  Current (due in 12 mo), money to suppliers, payroll, …  Long term Debt (Bonds, convertibles, & commercial paper)  Shareholder’s Equity  Equity = Assets – Liabilities  What’s left of the assets after paying all liabilities  Assets of a company can be funded by debt OR equity
  • 4. CREDIT RATINGS  Few people realize the global equity, or stock, market is dwarfed by the bond market  Outstanding bond debt totaled roughly $82 trillion in 2008, v. about $40 trillion in the stock markets  Companies can survive large drops in equity, but they generally don’t survive very long when they default (miss payments) on their bond debts, file for bankruptcy, or renegotiate loan terms  Ratings agencies like Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, and Fitch provide convenient and useful measures of a company’s financial health
  • 5. MOODY’S RATING - THE SOUTHERN CO.  The Southern Company, parent of Gulf Power, is rated A3, which is great, but it looks like they may get downgraded
  • 7. MOODY’S LETTER RATINGS  Below is a one-year migration table for Moody’s ratings  Can be further distinguished with numbers (22 in total)  Notice:  Dominance of the diagonal  Heavy weighting to the right of the diagonal  Absorbing states, Default and Withdrawn Rating  Equivalent to financial death Average One-Year Letter Rating Migration Rates, 1970-2008 From/To Aaa Aa A Baa Ba B Caa Ca-C Default WR Aaa 88.495 7.618 0.650 0.026 0.028 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.000 3.179 Aa 1.047 86.817 7.077 0.288 0.042 0.016 0.008 0.001 0.016 4.688 A 0.066 2.832 87.274 4.961 0.473 0.086 0.028 0.003 0.024 4.253 Baa 0.043 0.191 4.786 84.382 4.165 0.781 0.203 0.021 0.163 5.265 Ba 0.008 0.056 0.395 5.678 76.054 7.070 0.549 0.061 1.084 9.045 B 0.011 0.037 0.133 0.346 5.034 73.940 5.090 0.620 4.165 10.624 Caa 0.000 0.026 0.037 0.222 0.484 8.928 60.782 3.589 13.122 12.810 Ca-C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.331 2.790 9.446 39.479 30.033 17.921 Default 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 100.000 0.000 WR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 100.000
  • 8. INVESTMENT QUALITY  Total space of Letter Ratings  These ratings can be partitioned into three levels of investment quality  Investment Grade  Most mutual funds and other retirement-oriented funds are only allowed to buy investment grade bonds  High Yield (Speculative or Junk)  Only aggressive investors buy this type of debt  Most likely to be mispriced due to market inefficiencies  Default or Withdrawn Rating              CCaCaa,B,Ba,HY,BaaA,Aa,Aaa,IG        WRDefault,C,CaCaa,B,Ba,Baa,A,Aa,Aaa,S
  • 9. CANONICAL FORM FOR MIGRATION TABLE  Transient block                             39.4799.4462.7900.3310.0000.0000.0000.000 3.58960.7828.9280.4840.2220.0370.0260.000 0.6205.09073.9405.0340.3460.1330.0370.011 1.0610.5497.07076.0545.6780.3950.0560.008 0.0210.2030.7814.16584.3824.7860.1910.043 0.0030.0280.0860.4734.96187.2742.8320.066 0.0010.0080.0160.0420.2887.07786.8171.047 0.0000.0020.0020.0280.0260.6507.61888.495 CCa Caa B Ba Baa A Aa Aaa CCaCaaBBaBaaAAaAaaQ  Recurrent block                             17.92130.033 12.81013.122 10.6244.165 9.0451.084 5.2650.163 4.2530.024 4.6880.016 3.1790.000 CCa Caa B Ba Baa A Aa Aaa WRDefaultR
  • 11. TIME SPENT IN TRANSIENT STATES  Companies rated Aaa are expected to remain so for 9.312 years, while they can be expected to spend 0.482 years as speculative Ba  Notice the dominance of the diagonal  Tendency to remain at current rating                             1.6830.4560.3720.1250.0750.0460.0150.002 0.1732.7331.0490.3200.2240.1390.0470.007 0.0820.6034.3551.0420.6050.3740.1190.020 0.0380.2851.5034.9062.2061.1920.3430.051 0.0230.1750.7771.6758.2353.7301.0150.146 0.0140.1040.4560.9843.83910.7742.5550.310 0.0090.0670.2900.6202.3946.2479.4910.909 0.0070.0520.2240.4821.8264.7576.4329.312 CCa Caa B Ba Baa A Aa Aaa CCaCaaBBaBaaAAaAaaQ)-(I -1
  • 12. TIME UNTIL ABSORPTION  Row sum equals the expected number of years spent as Investment Grade and High Yield entities  After that, the only remaining states are Default and Withdrawn Rating  The better the current rating, the longer you can expect a company’s debt to provide you with income  It seems reasonable to invest in Investment Grade debt with 15-20 year maturities. Similarly, you probably shouldn’t invest in High Yield debt with maturities greater than 10 years , CCa Caa B Ba Baa A Aa Aaa CCaCaaBBaBaaAAaAaaQ)-(I -1                             1.6830.4560.3720.1250.0750.0460.0150.002 0.1732.7331.0490.3200.2240.1390.0470.007 0.0820.6034.3551.0420.6050.3740.1190.020 0.0380.2851.5034.9062.2061.1920.3430.051 0.0230.1750.7771.6758.2353.7301.0150.146 0.0140.1040.4560.9843.83910.7742.5550.310 0.0090.0670.2900.6202.3946.2479.4910.909 0.0070.0520.2240.4821.8264.7576.4329.312                            2.774 4.693 7.198 10.525 15.776 19.036 20.028 23.092 CCa Caa B Ba Baa A Aa Aaa Years
  • 13. PROBABILITY OF TRANSIENT STATE J  The off-diagonal entries represent the probability of EVER going from rating i to j  Diagonal entries represent the probability of returning to rating i given that it started with rating i  Let F = (I-Q)-1, => (F-I) X diag(F)-1 , CCa Caa B Ba Baa A Aa Aaa CCaCaaBBaBaaAAaAaa)Q)-diag((II)-Q)-((I -1-1-1                             40.59416.6828.5592.5430.9090.4220.1550.025 10.29263.41624.0906.5202.7151.2940.4950.077 4.85022.05477.03621.2297.3433.4711.2490.216 2.26310.43734.51979.61826.78911.0633.6160.549 1.3726.41417.83834.14387.85734.61610.6911.572 0.8183.82010.47920.04846.61890.71826.9173.327 0.5282.4646.67112.63729.06857.98689.4649.764 0.4071.9095.1559.82622.17444.15167.76989.261
  • 14. ABSORPTION PROBABILITIES  The probability of being downgraded to one of the two absorbing ratings, given the transient rating on the left  Row sums equal unity  Withdrawal of rating is the most likely scenario  Considered a neutral way of retiring debt  Default risk is drastically more significant for High Yield rated debt  Debt default is negative for all parties and loss of investment ensues                             41.76058.240 54.17245.828 70.26329.737 83.14016.860 90.5069.494 94.3255.675 96.2753.725 97.1372.863 CCa Caa B Ba Baa A Aa Aaa WRDefaultRQ)-(I -1
  • 16. BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.  Run by Warren Buffet, CEO & Chairman, and Charlie Munger, Vice Chairman  Initially rated Aaa in June of 2001 on $700 million of shelf debt, which was later used to finance the purchase of Executive Jet Inc. (NetJets®)  Long-term debt rated Aaa in April 2006  Recently downgraded to Aa in April 2009  Buffet’s age, 79, was significant to rating action  89.3% chance of ever regaining Aaa rating  3.7% chance of defaulting  Outstanding debt expected to last 20 years  Longest dated debt, $1.7B @ 3.2%, matures in 2015
  • 17. GULF POWER COMPANY  Current Rating is A (since at least 1995)  On watch for potential downgrade, as well as Georgia Power Co., and Mississippi Power Co.  Lower revenues due to the recession (Surprise!)  Lower revenues due to economic impact of BP oil spill  High Capital Expenditures for environmental compliance over the next several years  FL regulators have not allowed utilities to charge customers rates that produce expected returns  90.7% chance of regaining A rating if downgraded  5.7% chance of defaulting  Outstanding debt expected to last 19 years  Longest dated debt, $35M @ 5.875%, in 2044
  • 18. NEW ALBERTSON’S, INC.  My first employer (W. 9 Mile & Pine Forest Rd)  Current Rating is Ba  Aa in May 1992  Withdrawn rating in May 1995  Aa in Jun 1995  A in Mar 1999, downgrade  Baa in Jan 2001, downgrade  Ba in April 2006, downgrade  B in May 2006, downgrade  Ba Jan 2009, upgrade  High Yield (Junk) status  16.9% chance of defaulting  Outstanding debt expected to last 10.5 years (or 7.2 years to be conservative)  Longest dated debt, $225M @ 8.7%, in 2030
  • 19. BRITISH PETROLEUM P.L.C.  Recently downgraded to A from Aa  A in May 1995  Aa in Nov 1995, upgrade  A in Jun 2010, downgrade  Still Investment Grade  Risk of default increased to 5.7% from 3.7%  Outstanding debt expected to last 19 years  Initially rated as A. The probability of ever being upgraded to Aa was 27%. Probability of returning to A was 91%. 47% chance of Baa rating (still investment grade)
  • 20. DISCUSSION  Two important safety criteria for debt investors are time horizon and low default risk. Markov analysis shows the usefulness of Moody’s rating system for categorizing investments by these two criteria  Considering the expected time-to-absorption for Investment Grade debt is longer than 15 years, it makes sense for retirement oriented investment funds to stick with these types of debt securities  Similarly, due to their relatively short life spans, and high default rates, High Yield investments SHOULD be limited to more discretionary funds with greater appetite for risk
  • 22. PROFILE OF NEW DEBT ISSUERS Issuers by Debt Rating Issuers By IG 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Aaa Aa A Baa Ba B 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Invest Grade Spec Grade
  • 23. REASONS FOR DEFAULT  Moody’s definition of default includes three types of credit events  A missed or delayed disbursement of interest and/or principal  Bankruptcy, administration, legal receivership, or other legal blocks (perhaps by regulators) to the timely payment of interest and/or principal  A distressed exchange occurs where: (i) the issuer offers debt holders a new security or package of securities that amount to a diminished financial obligation (such as preferred or common stock, or debt with a lower coupon or par amount, lower seniority, or longer maturity); and (ii) the exchange has the effect of allowing the issuer to avoid a bankruptcy or payment default  Taken from “Corporate Default and Recovery Rates, 1920-2008,” February 2009
  • 24. REASONS FOR WITHDRAWAL OF RATINGS  A withdrawn rating signifies the removal of a rating on either an obligation or an issuer. Withdrawn ratings reflect Moody's current view of the credit at the time of withdrawal  Inadequate information  Any rating may be withdrawn if, in Moody's opinion, there is insufficient information to assess effectively the creditworthiness of the issuer or obligation. This would typically hold in situations where the issuer declines to provide information requested by Moody's and Moody's cannot otherwise attain the requested information through public channels  Bankruptcy/Reorganization/Liquidation  If the issuer defaults, enters bankruptcy/reorganization or is liquidated, it may no longer be useful or necessary for Moody's to maintain a rating on the issuer or the issuer's obligations  Business Reasons  Under certain circumstances, Moody's will withdraw a rating for an issuer or an obligation for reasons unrelated to the adequacy of information, or bankruptcy or reorganization status of the credit. When this occurs, Moody's will balance the market need for a rating against the resources required to maintain and monitor a rating  Maturity of obligation  An obligation rating will be withdrawn when the rated obligation is no longer outstanding. In practice, the vast majority of WR actions arise from routine debt maturities, calls, or redemptions  Taken from “Moody’s Guidelines for the Withdrawal of Ratings.” January 2004