This letter provides a strong recommendation for Joseph Insalaco from his supervisor Mary Wade. Wade has known Insalaco for many years as both a colleague and friend at the Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, where Insalaco worked as a skilled microbiologist and molecular biologist. Wade describes Insalaco as having an excellent work ethic, being highly reliable, and always eager to take on more responsibilities. Wade believes Insalaco would be a valuable asset and team player for any new organization. The letter expresses regret that budget cuts necessitated Insalaco's departure from ECBC, but assurance that his skills will allow him to contribute greatly elsewhere.
Research findings about the obstacles students face in the research process and some possible interventions to help them overcome those obstacles.
Presented at Computers in Libraries 2016 with Christi Showman Farrar.
Research findings about the obstacles students face in the research process and some possible interventions to help them overcome those obstacles.
Presented at Computers in Libraries 2016 with Christi Showman Farrar.
Join us in Boston this coming Fall to attend Cambridge Healthtech Institute's (CHI) 2nd Annual FAST: Functional Analysis & Screening Technologies Congress on November 17-19, 2014 and meet with a community of 250+ biologists, screening managers, assay developers, engineers and pharmacologists dedicated to improving in vitro cell models and phenotypic screening to advance drug discovery and development at 6 conferences: Phenotypic Drug Discovery (Part I & II), Engineering Functional 3D Models, Screening and Functional Analysis of 3D Models, Organotypic Culture Models for Toxicology and Physiologically-Relevant Cellular Tumor Models for Drug Discovery. Delegates have the opportunity to share insights in interactive panel discussions and connect during networking breaks. View innovative technologies and scientific research revolutionizing early-stage drug discovery in the exhibit/poster hall.
PROCESS ACCEPTANCE AND ADOPTION BY IT SOFTWARE PROJ.docxstilliegeorgiana
PROCESS ACCEPTANCE AND ADOPTION BY IT SOFTWARE
PROJECT PRACTITIONERS
by
Deana R. Guardado
RICHARD DANIELS, PhD, Faculty Mentor and Chair
HENRY GARSOMBKE, PhD, Committee Member
SHARON E. BLANTON, PhD, Committee Member
William A. Reed, PhD, Dean, School of Business and Technology
A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Capella University
June 2012
All rights reserved
INFORMATION TO ALL USERS
The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed,
a note will indicate the deletion.
All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
ProQuest LLC.
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346
UMI 3512446
Copyright 2012 by ProQuest LLC.
UMI Number: 3512446
Abstract
This study addresses the question of what factors determine acceptance and adoption of
processes in the context of Information Technology (IT) software development projects.
This specific context was selected because processes required for managing software
development projects are less prescriptive than in other, more straightforward, IT
contexts. Adopting a process that affects how well custom software is developed and
implemented may be different from would be required in the IT Infrastructure field.
Levels of acceptance and adoption are ascertained using the Unified Theory of the Use
and Acceptance of Technology (UTAUT) model first proposed by Venkataesh, Morris,
Davis & Davis (2003), combining several technology acceptance models into one that
demonstrated the best fit for studying acceptance of technology. As suggested by
Venkatesh (Venkatesh, 2006) in a later study, the model was applied to the study of
process acceptance. Like the original study, this was based on a survey sent to IT
software development project practitioners who had actually worked on projects within
two months of conducting the study. Results show that effort expectancy, attitude, social
influence, facilitating conditions, and self-efficacy are significant determinants for
accepting process; and that attitude in particular is a determinant of process adoption. The
original study on technology acceptance found that performance expectancy, effort
expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions were significant. While the
studies agree on significance of effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating
conditions, this study found that self-efficacy and attitude are also significant, and that
performance expectancy is not. Attitude, in particular, demonstrated that the respondents
show that processes have also been adopted as a way of doing business. Implicati ...
Why i left my job in genomics R&D - Lunteren - april 18 - 2016Fiona Nielsen
Career talk about how I moved from bioinformatics scientist to become an entrepreneur.
Presented at BioSB2016, pre-conference PhD retreat for young researchers in bioinformatics and systems biology at Congrescentrum De Werelt in Lunteren. #BioSB2016 #BioSB16
Link to event:
http://www.youngcb.nl/events/biosb-phd-retreat-2016/
Read more about my work:
http://DNAdigest.org
http://repositive.io
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/fionanielsen
Join us in Boston this coming Fall to attend Cambridge Healthtech Institute's (CHI) 2nd Annual FAST: Functional Analysis & Screening Technologies Congress on November 17-19, 2014 and meet with a community of 250+ biologists, screening managers, assay developers, engineers and pharmacologists dedicated to improving in vitro cell models and phenotypic screening to advance drug discovery and development at 6 conferences: Phenotypic Drug Discovery (Part I & II), Engineering Functional 3D Models, Screening and Functional Analysis of 3D Models, Organotypic Culture Models for Toxicology and Physiologically-Relevant Cellular Tumor Models for Drug Discovery. Delegates have the opportunity to share insights in interactive panel discussions and connect during networking breaks. View innovative technologies and scientific research revolutionizing early-stage drug discovery in the exhibit/poster hall.
PROCESS ACCEPTANCE AND ADOPTION BY IT SOFTWARE PROJ.docxstilliegeorgiana
PROCESS ACCEPTANCE AND ADOPTION BY IT SOFTWARE
PROJECT PRACTITIONERS
by
Deana R. Guardado
RICHARD DANIELS, PhD, Faculty Mentor and Chair
HENRY GARSOMBKE, PhD, Committee Member
SHARON E. BLANTON, PhD, Committee Member
William A. Reed, PhD, Dean, School of Business and Technology
A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Capella University
June 2012
All rights reserved
INFORMATION TO ALL USERS
The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed,
a note will indicate the deletion.
All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
ProQuest LLC.
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346
UMI 3512446
Copyright 2012 by ProQuest LLC.
UMI Number: 3512446
Abstract
This study addresses the question of what factors determine acceptance and adoption of
processes in the context of Information Technology (IT) software development projects.
This specific context was selected because processes required for managing software
development projects are less prescriptive than in other, more straightforward, IT
contexts. Adopting a process that affects how well custom software is developed and
implemented may be different from would be required in the IT Infrastructure field.
Levels of acceptance and adoption are ascertained using the Unified Theory of the Use
and Acceptance of Technology (UTAUT) model first proposed by Venkataesh, Morris,
Davis & Davis (2003), combining several technology acceptance models into one that
demonstrated the best fit for studying acceptance of technology. As suggested by
Venkatesh (Venkatesh, 2006) in a later study, the model was applied to the study of
process acceptance. Like the original study, this was based on a survey sent to IT
software development project practitioners who had actually worked on projects within
two months of conducting the study. Results show that effort expectancy, attitude, social
influence, facilitating conditions, and self-efficacy are significant determinants for
accepting process; and that attitude in particular is a determinant of process adoption. The
original study on technology acceptance found that performance expectancy, effort
expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions were significant. While the
studies agree on significance of effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating
conditions, this study found that self-efficacy and attitude are also significant, and that
performance expectancy is not. Attitude, in particular, demonstrated that the respondents
show that processes have also been adopted as a way of doing business. Implicati ...
Why i left my job in genomics R&D - Lunteren - april 18 - 2016Fiona Nielsen
Career talk about how I moved from bioinformatics scientist to become an entrepreneur.
Presented at BioSB2016, pre-conference PhD retreat for young researchers in bioinformatics and systems biology at Congrescentrum De Werelt in Lunteren. #BioSB2016 #BioSB16
Link to event:
http://www.youngcb.nl/events/biosb-phd-retreat-2016/
Read more about my work:
http://DNAdigest.org
http://repositive.io
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/fionanielsen
Similar to Recommendation for Joe Insalaco MMW (20)
Why i left my job in genomics R&D - Lunteren - april 18 - 2016
Recommendation for Joe Insalaco MMW
1. Printed on Recycled Paper
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
US ARMY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COMMAND
EDGEWOOD CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL CENTER
5183 BLACKHAWK ROAD
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD 21010-5424
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
From: Branch Chief, Detection Spectrometry Branch, Physical Sciences Division,
Edgewood Chemical Biological Center R&T Directorate
Subject: Recommendation for Mr. Joseph Insalaco
It has been a privilege to have worked with Joe Insalaco for many years at the Edgewood
Chemical Biological Center. At ECBC I have known Joe as both a colleague and friend, as well
as serving as his government supervisor and Principle Investigator. I have known Joe since
January of 2004 at which time I was hired at ECBC and Joe was already a researcher employed
at the center. Joining the branch that Joe served on, I quickly gravitated towards Joe and counted
on him for the experience he had already gained at ECBC that I lacked. Joe was a tremendous
help to me, “showing me the ropes” at a new facility with a very steep learning curve for new
employees, especially those new to the government. Joe was always eager to help, eager to share
his knowledge and experience and always expressed a very consistent positive personality
towards me and other colleagues.
At ECBC, Joe was assigned to work on various projects I was leading and he worked on
projects of mine for many years. I found Joe to be an invaluable asset both in and out of the
laboratory. Joe quickly became my lead technician in the laboratory, overseeing multiple lab
workers. Joe is a very skilled microbiologist and molecular biologist conducting operations in
BSL2 and BSL3 environments with both surety and non-surety agents during the time he served
on my projects. He led the daily lab operations for programs involving detection of biological
agents and toxins as well as persistence of those agents in the environment. He helped with all
aspects of the projects from test plan development, execution and data analysis. He always
worked very well with his fellow lab mates, being extremely courteous, reliable and informative
on a daily basis.
On both a personal and professional note, Joe is a self-starter with one of the best work
ethics I have ever seen. He is honest, hard working and always eager to expand his capabilities
and contributions on a team. He is someone I think anyone would find quickly to be a team
player and most importantly someone you can count on in word and deed. I have the utmost
respect for Joe as he is someone with a wide breadth of experience from serving our Nation as a
soldier for approximately a decade to laboratory work as a scientist at ECBC, to program
specialist with JPEO and most recently as a trainer with our Advanced CBRNE Training Team.
Joe has very strong communication skills that are demonstrated when interacting with his
colleagues or communicating up the chain or outside the organization. He is easy to get along
with and is very enthusiastic about the work that he performs. As his government PI and
supervisor, Joe always kept himself engaged in work and was very proactive and many times
came to me asking to do “more”.
It is sincerely without reservation that I would recommend Joe Insalaco for employment
outside our center. It is sad that budget cuts have led to the loss of such a knowledgeable and
skilled individual, but I am certain someone as skilled as Joe will have no issues contributing in a
variety of ways to a new organization. Please do not hesitate to call me if you would like more
information or have any questions.