2. The register tells you:
Name
Date of Qualification
Date of entry to
specialist register
Holding registration with a licence to practise will move from being an
historical record of educational achievement to a contemporary
affirmation of competence
What are we trying to achieve?
3. What are we trying to achieve?
Bring all doctors into a clinical governed system
Help to identify problems earlier
Encourage self reflection
Contribute to safer and higher quality care for patients
4. Revalidation – the process
This is a five year process – NOT a fifth year process
6. Where are we now? The numbers
Doctors subject to revalidation in
the UK: 228,609
GMC figures, as at 31 August 2015
recommendations received by
the GMC: 144,777
number of doctors revalidated:
118,448
number of deferrals: 26,061
number of notifications of non-
engagement: 268
Revalidate
Deferral
Non-engagement
Not yet received
recommendation
7. Early evidence of impact?
94% of licensed doctor in the UK now connected to a designated
organisation/Responsible Officer
Appraisal rates for all doctors have increased significantly
e.g. from 64% (2011) to 87% (2015) for NHS consultants
Anecdotal claims of earlier identification of concerns – strong
support among Responsible Officers
24,795 doctors have chosen to give up their licence to practise
Suspended approval of recommendations in three organisations
Removed 1,890 licences due to failure to engage with the process
as a whole (e.g. providing no information to GMC)
8. What Responsible Officers say
“Revalidation for me is central to the quality agenda
that I am pushing in this hospital”
“….allowed me to develop a far better understanding
of what my doctors are actually doing in the hospital
and elsewhere - I feel more assured”
“….there is clearly a move towards better sharing of
information around doctors’ whole scope of practice
…. this is a direct result of revalidation”
“In short, fewer bolt holes for doctors with
unaddressed concerns to disappear into.”
10. What others say
86% of doctors who had been revalidated believed they
were treated fairly throughout the revalidation process
34% of doctors who had been revalidated indicated that
they were reflecting more on their work than a year ago
73% of employers said they felt that doctors were reflecting
more on their practice compared to 12 months ago and
59% of employers said they felt that doctors were more
aware of how to apply the principles in Good medical
practice compared to a year ago.
Over 2 million patients have provided feedback to their
doctors
11. How will we know it’s working?
Bring all doctors into a clinical governed system
Help to identify problems earlier
Encourage self reflection
Contribute to safer and higher quality care for patients
Evaluation
UK Medical Revalidation Evaluation Collaboration (UMbRELLA)
12. The future of revalidation
Revalidation the next phase?
More integrated with team performance
More objective data
More linked to specialist expectations
Easier to complete
Safety and quality increasingly recognised as critical everywhere
Data drives patients, professionals and providers to different
behaviours
Various systems for re-certification, re-licensure around the
world.
In the future, I’d expect to see revalidation letters up on practice noticeboards – further evidence that a doctor is up-to-date.
Revalidation is fundamental to the clinical governance of safe systems – boards and appraisers need to know the quality of their staff.
Step 1: Revalidation timeline
Step 2: 5 year cycle for each doctor
This will become a five year process – it is NOT a fifth year process
Responsible officers can recommend a deferral for two reasons: insufficient
evidence on which to base a recommendation or an on-going local process that
needs to be concluded before a recommendation is made. Deferral rates across the 4 countries ranges from 5% to 8%.
Deferral rates among doctors with different Primary Medical Qualification (PMQ)
regions seem relatively consistent. There is a higher proportion of female doctors receiving a deferral, which could be down to differences in parental leave.
Survey commissioned by the GMC in 2014
We have commissioned UMbRELLA (UK Medical Revalidation Evaluation Collaboration) – a collaboration of regulatory academics and revalidation implementers from across the UK to undertake a long term evaluation of revalidation which is due to finish in 2018. The evaluation is based on the framework we commissioned from Plymouth University. We are confident it will make a significant contribution to the development of medical revalidation in the UK.
How are GMC guidelines on appraisal being applied in practice and how might they be improved?
Has the process of collecting the supporting information and the appraisal process increased doctors’ levels of reflection?
Does revalidation help identify potential concerns earlier?
What level of involvement do patients want in the revalidation process?
Various systems for re-certification, re-lincensure around the world