SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
HaroldSowards
CJ 322, Tu/Th 9:30
8/28/15
Lawrence v. Texas
539 U.S. 558 (2003)
1. Facts
 Police were dispatchedtothe residencyof JohnGeddesLawrenceandTyrone Garner
regardinga weaponsdisturbance
 Theywere arrestedforviolatingTexasPenalCode Ann.Statute 21.06 (a) (2003) for
performinganal
 Theywere heldovernightandthenconvictedinfrontof aJustice of Peace at County
Criminal Courtat Law No.10, Harris County,Texas
 Theyappeal
 TexasCourt of Appealsaffirmthe decisionandcertiorari wasgranted
 Supreme CourtoverruledapastdecisioninBowersvHardwickandstatedthat the
Texasstatute that namedhomosexual conductasa crime was therefore
unconstitutional
 The judgmentof the Court of Appealsforthe TexasFourteenthDistrictisreversedand
the case isremandedforfurtherproceedings
2. Issue
Were the petitionersfreeasadultstoengage inprivate conductinthe exercise of theirliberty
underthe Due ProcessClause?
Under the Equal ProtectionClause,ismoral disapproval alegitimate state interesttojustifya
statute banninghomosexual sodomy,butnotheterosexual sodomy?
3. Holdings
Yes
No,remanded
4. Reasoning
The Due ProcessClause grantsthe libertyprotectedbythe Constitutiontoallow homosexual
personsthe rightto choose to enteruponrelationshipsinthe confinesof theirhomesandtheir
ownprivate livesandstill certaintheirdignityasfree persons. Nominorswere involved,no
prostitution,nopeopleable togetinjured,howeveritdoesinvolve peopleofferingconsent.
Also,a state isn’tallowedtodiscriminate againstanygroupof persons.

More Related Content

More from Harold Sowards (20)

Dive heart project
Dive heart projectDive heart project
Dive heart project
 
Pseudo family violence
Pseudo family violencePseudo family violence
Pseudo family violence
 
Pseudofamilyviolence sowards
Pseudofamilyviolence sowardsPseudofamilyviolence sowards
Pseudofamilyviolence sowards
 
Sowards 440exam
Sowards 440examSowards 440exam
Sowards 440exam
 
Rape review
Rape reviewRape review
Rape review
 
Movie review
Movie reviewMovie review
Movie review
 
Line of duty review
Line of duty reviewLine of duty review
Line of duty review
 
Us v. maze
Us v. mazeUs v. maze
Us v. maze
 
Us v. garcia
Us v. garciaUs v. garcia
Us v. garcia
 
Us v. ancheta
Us v. anchetaUs v. ancheta
Us v. ancheta
 
State v. zeta chi fraternity
State v. zeta chi fraternityState v. zeta chi fraternity
State v. zeta chi fraternity
 
State v. ulvinen
State v. ulvinenState v. ulvinen
State v. ulvinen
 
State v. tomaino
State v. tomainoState v. tomaino
State v. tomaino
 
State v. stark
State v. starkState v. stark
State v. stark
 
State v. snowden
State v. snowdenState v. snowden
State v. snowden
 
State v. sexton
State v. sextonState v. sexton
State v. sexton
 
State v. schleifer
State v. schleiferState v. schleifer
State v. schleifer
 
State v. ninham
State v. ninhamState v. ninham
State v. ninham
 
State v. metzger
State v. metzgerState v. metzger
State v. metzger
 
State v. mays
State v. maysState v. mays
State v. mays
 

Recently uploaded

一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 
一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理
e9733fc35af6
 
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSSASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
CssSpamx
 
一比一原版(Monash毕业证书)澳洲莫纳什大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Monash毕业证书)澳洲莫纳什大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Monash毕业证书)澳洲莫纳什大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Monash毕业证书)澳洲莫纳什大学毕业证如何办理
bd2c5966a56d
 
一比一原版(IC毕业证书)帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(IC毕业证书)帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理一比一原版(IC毕业证书)帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(IC毕业证书)帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理
Fir La
 
一比一原版(Essex毕业证书)埃塞克斯大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版(Essex毕业证书)埃塞克斯大学毕业证学位证书一比一原版(Essex毕业证书)埃塞克斯大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版(Essex毕业证书)埃塞克斯大学毕业证学位证书
F La
 
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 
一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 
一比一原版(USC毕业证书)南加州大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版(USC毕业证书)南加州大学毕业证学位证书一比一原版(USC毕业证书)南加州大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版(USC毕业证书)南加州大学毕业证学位证书
irst
 
Interpretation of statute topics for project
Interpretation of statute topics for projectInterpretation of statute topics for project
Interpretation of statute topics for project
VarshRR
 
一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理
Fir La
 

Recently uploaded (20)

一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Carleton毕业证书)加拿大卡尔顿大学毕业证如何办理
 
Cyber Laws : National and International Perspective.
Cyber Laws : National and International Perspective.Cyber Laws : National and International Perspective.
Cyber Laws : National and International Perspective.
 
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSSASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
 
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
 
Career As Legal Reporters for Law Students
Career As Legal Reporters for Law StudentsCareer As Legal Reporters for Law Students
Career As Legal Reporters for Law Students
 
一比一原版(Monash毕业证书)澳洲莫纳什大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Monash毕业证书)澳洲莫纳什大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Monash毕业证书)澳洲莫纳什大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Monash毕业证书)澳洲莫纳什大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版(IC毕业证书)帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(IC毕业证书)帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理一比一原版(IC毕业证书)帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(IC毕业证书)帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理
 
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteThe doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
 
一比一原版(Essex毕业证书)埃塞克斯大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版(Essex毕业证书)埃塞克斯大学毕业证学位证书一比一原版(Essex毕业证书)埃塞克斯大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版(Essex毕业证书)埃塞克斯大学毕业证学位证书
 
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
 
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
 
How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...
How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...
How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...
 
一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(ECU毕业证书)埃迪斯科文大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版(USC毕业证书)南加州大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版(USC毕业证书)南加州大学毕业证学位证书一比一原版(USC毕业证书)南加州大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版(USC毕业证书)南加州大学毕业证学位证书
 
Interpretation of statute topics for project
Interpretation of statute topics for projectInterpretation of statute topics for project
Interpretation of statute topics for project
 
Reason Behind the Success of Law Firms in India
Reason Behind the Success of Law Firms in IndiaReason Behind the Success of Law Firms in India
Reason Behind the Success of Law Firms in India
 
It’s Not Easy Being Green: Ethical Pitfalls for Bankruptcy Novices
It’s Not Easy Being Green: Ethical Pitfalls for Bankruptcy NovicesIt’s Not Easy Being Green: Ethical Pitfalls for Bankruptcy Novices
It’s Not Easy Being Green: Ethical Pitfalls for Bankruptcy Novices
 
一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理
 
Performance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentationPerformance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentation
 

Lawrence v. texas

  • 1. HaroldSowards CJ 322, Tu/Th 9:30 8/28/15 Lawrence v. Texas 539 U.S. 558 (2003) 1. Facts  Police were dispatchedtothe residencyof JohnGeddesLawrenceandTyrone Garner regardinga weaponsdisturbance  Theywere arrestedforviolatingTexasPenalCode Ann.Statute 21.06 (a) (2003) for performinganal  Theywere heldovernightandthenconvictedinfrontof aJustice of Peace at County Criminal Courtat Law No.10, Harris County,Texas  Theyappeal  TexasCourt of Appealsaffirmthe decisionandcertiorari wasgranted  Supreme CourtoverruledapastdecisioninBowersvHardwickandstatedthat the Texasstatute that namedhomosexual conductasa crime was therefore unconstitutional  The judgmentof the Court of Appealsforthe TexasFourteenthDistrictisreversedand the case isremandedforfurtherproceedings 2. Issue Were the petitionersfreeasadultstoengage inprivate conductinthe exercise of theirliberty underthe Due ProcessClause? Under the Equal ProtectionClause,ismoral disapproval alegitimate state interesttojustifya statute banninghomosexual sodomy,butnotheterosexual sodomy? 3. Holdings Yes No,remanded 4. Reasoning The Due ProcessClause grantsthe libertyprotectedbythe Constitutiontoallow homosexual personsthe rightto choose to enteruponrelationshipsinthe confinesof theirhomesandtheir ownprivate livesandstill certaintheirdignityasfree persons. Nominorswere involved,no prostitution,nopeopleable togetinjured,howeveritdoesinvolve peopleofferingconsent. Also,a state isn’tallowedtodiscriminate againstanygroupof persons.