Perspectives on the new USDA regulations for GM Crops | GES Colloquium, Part 5- Public Engagement Perspective
Video at https://go.ncsu.edu/ges-mediasite
Chat resources at https://go.ncsu.edu/ges-usda-panel-chat-links
1. Perspectives on the new USDA
regulations for GM crops
Jason A. Delborne, Professor
Forestry & Environmental Resources
Genetic Engineering and Society
Center
GES Colloquium (webinar)
June 5, 2020
2. Public Comments = Public
Engagement?
• 6,150 comments
• “Most of the comments,
while not form letters,
expressed a generalized,
similarly themed
opposition to GE
products.”
• “Of the comments that specifically addressed the provisions of
the rule, approximately 25 expressed some support for the
rule.”
3. Engagement: Building Trust
“While we recognize the agency’s rationale behind self-
determination and desire to provide regulatory relief in
order to spur innovation, we are concerned that rather than
stimulating innovation, such an undisclosed step may
have the effect of dampening trust through the loss of
transparency in the development and oversight
process” (J. Doudna [co-inventor of CRISPR], public
comment to APHIS).
Building trust (in conflict with self-determination, while companies will probably ask USDA to confirm exemptions)
Risk tolerance is not simply an expert driven process. How do we make sense that a single edit is deserving of an exemption, but two is enough to require RSR?
Implementation favors large companies (e.g. producers of soy, corn, alfalfa, etc.) over minor crops and vegetables. What sort of stakeholder engagement process creates this kind of advantage? (Presentation by rep from Pairwise who wants to work on increasing fruits and vegetable consumption through gene editing) Am I regulated goes away in August 2020, RSR starts for major crops in April 2021, then all in October.