1.
Or, the role of agent based modeling in historical archaeology Shawn Graham, Carleton University @electricarchaeo“2”cc: t1ck, Flickr

2.
“HUG?” cc, ~bassoonbuddy247, DeviantArt

3.
Ein Augur erklärt Numa Pompilius nach dem Orakel des Vogelfluges zumKönig, Radierung von Bernhard Rode 1768-69, Wikicommons

4.
Saul and the Witch of Endor, William Mount, 1807-1868. Wikicommons.

5.
„Classic Romero Zombies‟ Cc Pedro Vezini, Flickr

6.
•Not useful for literate societies •Tautological •Not a very good analogy, is it?Screencapture, Monty Python & The Holy Grail

7.
http://wallpoper.com/wallpaper/pink-floyd-407858

8.
 I‟m a one-man band. My models need to be simple  in their aims  in their outputs

9.
http://www.digitalstudies.org/ojs/index.php/digital_studies/article/viewArticle/172 …bit of garbage in there. It‟s actually „2‟.

10.
Smaller, more constrained modelshave bigger impacts…at least in the humanities… Roman Hispania, Road Network - Wikicommons

11.
Hodder, Ian. Entangled: Anarchaeology of the relationshipsbetween humans and things. Wiley-Blackwell 2012. Pg 181, Figure 9.2Entanglements of clay at Catalhoyuk.

12.
Difficulty of teasing out the key relationships in complex models Human-thingPart of a relationshipsmodular infinitelyapproach extensible ABM need to be small for historical archaeology One issue, one resistance model

13.
Shawn Graham,Carleton University@electricarchaeo