The Prevention Of Corruption Act Presentation.pptx
Board of directors meetings of companies
1.
2.
3.
4. Subsribers to
memorandum
- First Director [Sec 152]
Member
- Every director other than first
director to be appointed in General
Meeting
Board of
Directors
- Alternate Director
- Additional Director
- Casual Vacancy
Third Parties
- Central Government
- Tribunal
- Proportional representation
5.
6. Appointment of the new directors other than retiring directors in public company
02
03
If a person were to be appointed as a director , he should
be an eligible person to hold the office as the director
Such intention of the person is to be made known to the
company by serving a notice at least 14 days before the
meeting
01
A notice is to served along with deposit of Rs.100000 or
such higher amount as may be prescribed which shall be
refunded , is to be made by such person or by the member
who proposes him as the director.
Company shall inform all the members at least seven
days before the meeting about this candidature04
7. 06
07
It shall be informed to all the members individually by
sending a notice or by giving advertisement in at least two
newspapers, circulated in the place where the registered
office of the company is located
If such person , who served the notice to become the
director, is elected as director or obtained 25% favourable
votes , the amount deposited by him will be refunded to him
05
If he is not elected as director , then the amount
deposited by him will be forfeited by the company
.
Every person whose name is proposed as the candidate for
the office of a director shall sign and file with company his
consent in writing to act as a director , if appointed.
08
Likewise as person who for the first time has been appointed
as a director has also to file such consent in writing to the
registrar within 30 days from the date of his appointment
09
8.
9.
10. Minimum Directors :
a) Public Company – 3
b) Private Company – 2
c) One person – 1
Maximum Directors in a Company : 15 [NA to Sec 8 Co]
More than 15 through special resolution
Maximum Directorships held by a person [Sec 165]: 20
[including alternate directors, maximum limit for public company :10]
Penalty of Rs 5000 per day and disqualified u/s 164 in ALL companies of directorship
11. TYPE DESCRIPTION
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR HOLD OFFICE UPTO AGM
ALTERNATE DIRECTOR ABSENCE FROM INDIA FOR NOT LESS THAN 3 MONTHS
NOMINEE DIRECTOR NOMINATED BY INSTITUTION
SMALL SHAREHOLDERS
DIRECTOR [151]
LISTED COMPANY : 1000 SHAREHOLDERS/ 1/10TH OF
MEMBERS whichever is lower
Maximum 2 Companies
WOMEN DIRECTOR a) LISTED COMPANY &
b) PUBLIC COMPANY
Paid up capital > Rs 100 crores, or
Turnover > Rs 300 crores
INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR a) LISTED COMPANY
b) PUBLIC COMPANY
Paid up capital > Rs 10 crores, or
Turnover > Rs 100 crores, or
Loans/debentures/deposits > 50 crores
ROTATIONAL DIRECTOR PUBLIC COMPANY :
2/3 Liable to retire of which 1/3 will retire
12. Every Listed company shall have at least 1/3 of the total number of directors as
independent directors
An independent director in relation to a company means a director other than
managing directors or a whole-time director or a nominee
According to Section 152
who, in the opinion of the board ,
is a person of integrity and
possesses relevant expertise and
experience.
who is not a promoter of the
company or its holding, subsidiary
or associate company
;
promoters or directors in
who is not related to the
the
company, its holding,
subsidiary or associate company
who has or had no pecuniary
relation or transaction with
the company
13. Act
2013
Act
1956
Act
2013
Act
1956
Members and HUF Y Y Husband and wife Y Y
Father (including step-
father)
Y Y Mother (including step-
mother)
Y Y
Father’s father N Y Mother’s father N Y
Father’s mother N Y Mother’s mother N Y
Son (including step-son) Y Y Daughter (NOT MENTIONED
including step-daughter)
Y Y
Son’s wife Y Y Daughter’s husband Y Y
Son's son/ daughter N Y Daughter’s son daughter N Y
Son’s son’s wife N Y Daughter’s son’s wife N Y
Son’s daughter’s husband N Y Daughter’s daughter’s
husband
N Y
Brother Y Y Sister Y Y
14.
15. (1) Independent judgment to
bear on the Board’s
deliberations especially on
issues of strategy, performance,
risk management, resources,
key appointments and
standards of conduct
(2) bring an objective
view in the evaluation of
the performance of board
and management
(3) scrutinise the
performance of
management in meeting
agreed goals & monitor the
reporting of performance
(4) satisfy themselves on the
integrity of financial
information and that
financial controls and the
systems of risk management
are robust and defensible
(5) safeguard the
interests of all
stakeholders, particularly
the minority shareholders
(6) balance the conflicting
interest of the
stakeholders
(7) determine remuneration of
executive directors, KMP &
senior management. Prime role
in appointing and recommend
removal of executive directors,
KMP & senior management;
(8) moderate and
arbitrate in the interest of
the company as a whole,
in situations of conflict
between management and
shareholder’s.
18. Not Eligible for Appointment
- Unsound mind, Undischarged insolvent, not
paid calls in respect of shares held
- Order disqualifying him for appointment
passed by tribunal or court
- Convicted of an offence dealing with related
party transaction at any time during preceding
5 years
- Convicted to court for any moral offence and
sentenced thereof for not less than 6 months &
5 years has not elapsed since
-Convicted & sentenced for 7 years or more
Not Eligible for Re Appointment – Automatic
Vacation & Pvt Co applicable
[5 years from date on default]
•- Not filed financial statements or annual
returns for any continuous period of three
financials years
•- Failed to repay the deposits accepted or pay
interest or redeem debentures on due date or
pay dividend declared and such failure
continues for 1 year or more
•- Articles of association may provide
additional grounds for disqualification
19. In accordance with AOA
In good faith to promote objectives of the company
Exercise duty with reasonable care, skill, diligence
Not involve in situations which may conflict with interest of the company
Not achieve any undue gain or advantage [fine equal to gain Delhi HC]
Not to assign office
If the above is contravened director shall be punishable with fine of Rs 1,00,000 which may extend to Rs 5,00,000
20. Only through board meeting
Calls on shares
Authorise buy back
Issue shares and securities in/os India
Borrow monies
Investing the funds
Grant loans/ guarantee
Approve financial statements & Boards report
Diversification & Take over
Political contributions
Appointing or removing KMP
Appointing internal & secretarial auditors
Restrictions on Power of Board
Only with consent of members by special
resolution
To sell , lease or otherwise dispose entity
[20%]
To invest other than in trust securities amount
received as a result of merger
Borrow money [> paid up + reserves]
Remit or give time for repayment of debt
21.
22. 2/3rd of Directors of Public Company are liable to retire
Of which 1/3rd will retire at every AGM
Retirement by those who are longest in office
If same period of time in office as agreed between directors
• Adjourned to same day next week unless its national holiday then next day
• If at adjourned meeting vacancy not filled up then retiring director deemed
reappointed unless
• Resolution for re appointment put and lost
• Retiring director notice to company on unwillingness
• Disqualified for appointment
• Special or ordinary resolution required for re appointment
In case of vacancy on board due to retirement
Not counted in 2/3 : Nominee, Independent,Tribunal, Small
shareholder, additional, casual vacancy
Not retire : Executive director [MD,WTD]
23.
24. • Either in person/ video conference/ other audio visual means
First Meeting : 30 days from date of incorporation
• One Person, Small, Dormant, Private Company Startup [DIPP]:
• Atleast 1 meeting in each half of the calendar year [Sec 8 Company if no default in filing financial
statement]
• 90 days minimum gap between meetings
• Other Companies :
• Atleast 4 meetings in a calendar year
• 120 days maximum gap between meetings
Subsequent Meetings :
Adjournment in case of Quorum same day next week
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30. Minutes in physical
or electronic form
Prepared by
Chairman
Summary of
proceedings
To be entered
within 30 days of
meeting
Signed by
Chairman
Circulated to all
directors within 15
days
Once signed can be
altered only with
Board approval
31. Every officer of the Company whose duty is to give notice under this
provisions and who fails to do so shall be liable to a penalty of
Rs.25, 000.
If any default is made in complying with the provisions of the act In
respect of Board Meeting, the Company shall be liable to a penalty of
Rs.25, 000 and every officer of the company who is in default shall be
liable to a penalty of Rs.5, 000.
If a person is found guilty of tampering the minutes of the proceedings
of the meeting, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term
which may exceed to 2 years and with fine which shall not be less than
Rs.25, 000 but which may extend to Rs.1, 00,000.
If a director of the Company contravenes the provisions of Disclosure
of Interest by director then he shall be punishable with imprisonment
for a term may extend 1 year or fine which shall not be less than Rs.50,
000 but may extend to Rs.1, 00,000 or both.
36. • Financial statement
• Dividend declaration
• Director appointment
• Auditor Appointment & Remuneration
Ordinary Business :
• Every other matter other than ordinary business
Special Business :
• Business of Company taken over by Government
• Company did not function
• Accounts of company are not ready
AGM is Compulsory :
• Copy of annual report
• Material facts of each item of special business
• Shorter notice if agreed by 95% of members entitled to vote
Notice sent atleast 21 days prior to meeting with the following [Sec 101] : Member, Auditor, Director
37.
38. Extra Ordinary :
Any meeting between 2 AGM’s.
• Board / Members can call for the EGM
• Memebr 1/10 voting requisition
• Urgent matters
• Notice as AGM
• Can be held anywhere in India
Postal Ballot : Matters that can be
undertaken
Alteration of MOA/AOA
Buy Back of shares
Sale of undertaking
Shifting registered office outside
city/village
Issue of shares with differential rights
Change in purpose for which funds
unutilised as raised from public
Court Convened Meeting : NCLT
39. Call for an EGM
Appoint Proxy [Sec 105] :
• Submitted atleast 48 hours before meeting
• No right to speak or clarification
• Eligible for poll voting
• Can demand poll 10% voting/ Rs 5 lakh face value
• Single proxy represent max50 shareholders
• Defective proxy form can invalidate resolution passed
• Can be revoked by shareholder anytime
Request for inclusion of agenda items
• Requisition before 6 weeks deposited at registered office
• Deposit reasonable amount for company to meet expense for the request
Seek Appointment as Director
• Propose self/ other person
• 14 days prior to meeting with Rs 1 lakh deposit
• Company to inform other shareholders 7 days prior
40. Ask questions during meetingAsk
Elect Small shareholder director :
• Listed Company
• 1000 small shareholders or 1/10th of small shareholders
[face value <20,000Rs[
Elect
Access to Company documents
• Can take copies/ extract
• Documents include Registers, MOA,AOA, Minutes
Access
Approach stakeholder relationship committee with
grievance
Approach
41. Restriction : No voting in
respect of any shares
registerd on which calls not
paid
Show of hands : Unless poll
demanded, by show of hands
followed by declaration by
chairman
Postal Ballot:
Any business other than
ordinary business &
Any business in respect of
which directors and
auditors have right to be
heard
Postal ballot assented by
majority of shareholders
Demand for Poll :
By Chairman on his own
motion
Members holding shares in
aggregate of more than Rs 5
lakh in face value or 10%
voting rights
Chairman has power to
regulate poll
Result of poll shall deemed
to be the resolution passed
A company, though a legal entity in the eyes of law, is an artificial person, existing only in contemplation of law. It has no physical existence.
Directors of a company hold the most crucial position in the Company. With the new Companies Act, 2013 (“New Act“) already in force, their position has become even more significant than ever before. They are now formally included within the definition of “key managerial personnel” or “KMP” under Section 2(51) of the New Act.
The liberty given to private companies to self-regulate the appointment process has, surprisingly, been completely taken away Under Companies Act-2013. This sounds completely paradoxical, in view of the fact that in case of public companies, they still have the liberty to self-regulate to the extent of one third of the board strength.
f different person are not named as first director in articles of the company, individual subscribers shall be deemed to be first directors. Every director other than first directors of company shall be appointed in general meeting as per Section 152(2). If company Want to appoint a person as director in meeting other then General meeting Company can do this by appointing such person as additional direct.
Moreover, in the case named M.K. Srinivasan v. W.S. Subrahmanya Ayyar, an interest observation was made. This case dealt with the question whether a casual vacancy arises if a director appointed to fill this vacancy, does not assume office. The court was of the opinion that no casual vacancy is created if the director does not assume office merely for the reason of efflux of time. This is because the situation of vacating the office is not created if the director has never assumed the office.
There can be an addition to directors but total members of the directors should not exceed the maximum limit as mentioned in the articles – no there in 1956
New provision prohibiting a person who fails to get appointed as Director in a general meeting, from being appointed Additional Director
Existing director cannot be appointed as alternate director
Exclude dormant companies in 10
Special resolution members can reduce max directorship held by directo
ntermittent Vacancy: In case of any intermittent vacancy of woman director the same has to be filled-up by the Board at the earliest but not later than immediate next Board meeting or three months from the date of such vacancy whichever is later (
the Government has now empowered women to participate as one of the Board Members of the company. This step towards gender discrimination is welcomed by many leading companies some of which appointment Woman Director immediately on commencement of Companies Act, 2013.
he concept of Independent directors gained momentum in the late 1980s and early 1990s due to the uncovering of various corporate frauds and misfeasance.
The scam highlighted several loopholes in the Indian corporate governance structure - unethical conduct, fraudulent accounting, insider trading, oversight by auditors, ineffectiveness of Board, failure of independent directors and non-disclosure of material facts to the stakeholders.
ighter note, the Companies Act, 1956 considered the joint family size concept, whereas, the Companies Act, 2013 as taken into account the modern family size, i.e. the nuclear family and has reduced the list of relatives from the long list to a small list.
Corporate Governance is one of the most important differentiators of a business that has impact on the profitability, growth and sustainability of business. It is a multi-level process that relates to organization’s culture, policies and code of conduct.
In India, after due deliberated efforts of Kumar Birla committee and consequent recommendation of Narayan Murthy Committee, Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement was revised with modifications to adopt Corporate Governance structure. Primarily all listed companies were mandatorily required to adhere to Corporate Governance structure.
) An ID may be selected from a databank containing names, addresses and qualifications of persons who are eligible and willing to act as ID’s maintained by any body, institute or association as prescribed by the Central Government [Section 150 (1)].
ii) The appointment of ID’s shall be approved by the company in the general meeting [Section 152(2)]
v) Such data bank posted on the website shall-
be publicly accessible in the specified website,
be substantially identical to the physical panel or data bank;
be presented in a format convenient for both printing and viewing online and
contain a link to obtain a software required to view/ print the particulars free of charge.
vi) The Central government has the power to prescribe the manner of selection of ID’s who fulfills the qualifications and requirements under section 149.
Code for Independent Directors
The mandatory insertion of ID’s in specified classes of companies is highly anticipated to pave the way for transparent and accountable corporate governance. One of the core objectives of appointment of ID’s is to safeguard the interests of the minority shareholders. ID’s as a regulatory authority is vested with the sole responsibility to monitor the proper conduct and impartial judgment owing to the interests of the investors. Hence, inclusion of ID’s is expected to act as a strong instrument to check intended corporate scandals in the future.
Under the 2013 Act, a director could not be reappointed as a director in a company which had failed to file financial statements and annual returns for a continuous period of three years or had not repaid deposits or interest or redeemed debentures on the due date, etc. for a year or more.
The Amendment Act provides that a newly appointed director of a company in default should not incur such disqualification for a period of six months from his appointment, which gives him an opportunity to rectify the defect and avoid this disqualification within such period.
Further, if the existing director of such a company in default incurs disqualification, the office of such director would become vacant in all other companies, except the company which is in default, to ensure that the defaulting company has the requisite number of directors to remedy the default.
ptember 22, a total of 3,19,637 directors have been identified and flagged as disqualified under Section 164 (2) (a) of the Companies Act, 2013 It is estimated that the final list may touch the figure of about 4.5 lakh (directors).
The Amendment Act provides that a newly appointed director of a company in default should not incur such disqualification for a period of six months from his appointment, which gives him an opportunity to rectify the defect and avoid this disqualification within such period.
http://vinodkothari.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Article_on_ruling_under_section_166_Breach_of_duty-1.pdf
The Companies Act 2013 has ensured this balance of Power vis-à-vis responsibilities is maintained to most benefit to the Shareholders and ensure Corporate governance to the maximum extent possible. It utilizes both regulatory measures as well as penal measures including stringent judicial measures to ensure the regulations are properly followed and to avoid any mishap in corporate governance and to maintain the legal sanctity of the organization.
Major Corporate Debacles of recent times like Kingfisher, Sahara, Satyam etc has again and again proved the inability of Company Act 1956 to be ineffective in upholding Corporate Governance. Every time it is the Directors who are responsible in breaking Shareholders expectation and sometimes betraying the sentiments of stakeholders under a false veil of charisma, while using the corporate mechanism to fulfill personal welfare. To meet this challenge Companies Act 2013 has been enacted almost 50 years after the last amendment. It is built on the principles of responsibility of the Board, protection of interests of the Shareholders, self- regulation and openness through disclosures. The 2013 amendment has ensured several effective measures through clearly defining liabilities and responsibilities of the Directors and penal actions on failure to follow the same.
even if leave of absence granted; previously absence from 3 consecutive meetings or all meetings in 3 months without leave of absence
Safeguards – Adopt a Precautionary Approach.
5.1. To safeguard their interest and avoid undue liability, it is advisable that directors adopt a precautionary approach. A few of the safeguards that can be considered and implemented are as follows:
To attend meetings regularly;
To be inquisitive and peruse agendas for unusual items and seek additional information in writing, if necessary;
To ensure that disagreements/dissenting views are recorded in the minutes;
To act honestly and with reasonable justifications;
To report concerns about unethical behaviour, actual or suspected fraud or violation of the company's code of conduct or ethics policy;
To seek professional advice, establish audit committees, engage external agencies, if situation demands;
To engage external agencies for addressing whistleblowing issues. The Company may consider appointing an external agency for whistleblowing reporting;
To provide requisite disclosures of interests/conflicts, consider excusing oneself from participation in proceedings in cases of conflict;
For ongoing and day to day compliances, have a competent compliance team and establish committees (for regular internal audits etc.); and
To include indemnity provisions in the letter of appointment and seek Directors & Officers Liability insurance from the company to protect against malicious actions
The word ‘hold’ used above should be distinguished from the word ‘conducted’. The word ‘hold’ means ‘to keep’, whereas the word ‘conduct’ means ‘to carry out’. Thus, if a board meeting was validly called upon but could not be conducted for want of quorum, the provisions of section 173 shall not be deemed as contravened because such a meeting shall be deemed a validly held board meeting.
Where all the directors except, one are interested in a matter, the only way available with the company to resolve the matter is that to call a general meeting and get the approval of members to the matter in question. Another way available is to appoint more number of directors on the Board who are not interested in a matter. [Rajan Nagindas Joshi v British Burma Petroleum Co. Ltd.]
Primary purpose of meeting to ensure co gives reasonable & fair opportunity to those entitled to participate in meeting to take decisions
Memebers to discuss afars and ultimate control over management
Authority to call the meeting is with the board
Where all the directors except, one are interested in a matter, the only way available with the company to resolve the matter is that to call a general meeting and get the approval of members to the matter in question. Another way available is to appoint more number of directors on the Board who are not interested in a matter. [Rajan Nagindas Joshi v British Burma Petroleum Co. Ltd.]
Queom not present – void
½ hr recommend not mandatory
Invalid notice invalidate resolution passed at meeting