SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 24
TEAM A - ITMG 1B – MKTG 1102
Prepared for:
MorganWestcott
November 20, 2015
Presented by:
Andrew Anderson A00925997
Daniil Kim A00969142
Diego Gonzalez A00961462
Kyle Mitchell A00967954
Navdeep Hehar (Nav) A00954116
Rahul Sandhu A00968360
Tsz Chiu Sum(Mickey) A00854893
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Problem Statement _____________________________________________________________________________ 1
Key Findings and Assumptions ________________________________________________________________ 2
Environmental Analysis ________________________________________________________________________ 3
Target Market ___________________________________________________________________________________ 7
Competitive Analysis ___________________________________________________________________________ 8
Alternatives ____________________________________________________________________________________ 10
Solution _________________________________________________________________________________________13
Implementation Plan __________________________________________________________________________ 15
Course Concepts _______________________________________________________________________________ 17
References _____________________________________________________________________________________ 18
Appendix _______________________________________________________________________________________ 21
PROBLEM STATEMENT
1
OVERVIEW OF SITUATION
Stella & Dot has experienced rapid growthover the past 12 years, reaching over30,000 Stylists
globally and over$200 million in sales. Stella & Dot is looking to go public within the next five
years, and is aiming todouble their sales revenueprior to going public. Withoutcompromising
the core integrity of the company, whichis empowering and inspiring women, Stella & Dot will
need to find a way to expand their current distribution plan (Wilson, 2015).
PROBLEMSTATEMENT
The problem statement that our team identified is, “How can Stella & Dot modify or adjust its
current distribution strategy and achieve$500 million in revenue by 2021?”
KEY FINDINGS AND ASSUMPTIONS
2
Through research, our team found the followingkey findings and made the following
assumptions:
KEY FINDINGS
 Stella & Dot’s standard shipping is $5.95 for10-day delivery,and its fastest shipping is
$19.95 for 4-day shipping. Shipping for trunk shows workthe same as an online purchase
(Stella & Dot,2015)
 55% of shoppers who buy online prefer topurchase from a retailer witha physicalstore
than an online store (Forbes, 2014)
 62% of females would prefer to buy apparel in store, rather than online (eMarketer, 2015)
 Stella & Dot’s revenue in 2012 is $200 million (Ernst& Young,2015), and its revenue in
2013 is $220 million (Los Angeles Times, 2014)
 51% of shoppers don’t wantto wait to receivetheir item (Morrison, 2014)
 Stella & Dot has three companies: Stella & Dot (jewelry and accessories), Ever(skin care),
and Keep (collectives),wechose tofocus on Stella & Dot
ASSUMPTIONS
 Fashion, costume, and specialty jewelry belong to the same classification
 Movements among specialty jewelry willimitate the fashion market
 Stella & Dot’s behavior is categorized as an online retailer as its shipping procedures,
shipping prices, and trunk shows frequency does not fillthe gap forin-store availability
and experience
 Trunk shows are classified as a personalized experience towardssocial selling, and filling
the customer needs to try fashion products before buying
 2014 revenue forStella & Dot is $250 million as its growthrate is 13.6% (PrivCo,2015)
ENVIRONMENTALSCAN
3
Stella & Dot’s current environmental scan, internal strengths and weaknesses, and external
threats and opportunities.
Table 1: SWOT Analysis
Strengths Weaknesses
High growthrates
Highly profitable business model
Directsales distribution model
No retail outlets
Current expenses and costs
Small business units
Opportunities Threats
Multiple unused distribution channels in the US
Environmentally and socially aware market
Global markets: Emerging economies
Counterfeit products
Increasing labour wages
Dangerous chemicals in jewelry
The next section willanalyze the Table 1 data in detail.
STRENGTHS
High growth rates
 One year growthrate of 13.6% (PrivCo,2015)
 Three year growthrate of 12.5% (PrivCo,2015)
 Online women’s accessories sales grew 7% to$7.1 billion in the fiscalyear ending March
2014 (NPD,2014)
 Three out of seven accessories categories haveexperienced double-digit dollar sales gains
during the March2014 fiscal year(NPD,2014)
o Bag sales accounting for24% of the women’s total accessories market, increased
by 17% (NPD,2014)
Highly profitable businessmodel
 Stella & Dot’s revenue has been growing each year
o 2012 $200 million (Ernst & Young, 2015)
o 2013 $220 million (Los Angeles Times, 2014)
o 2014 $250 million (assumption)
ENVIRONMENTALSCAN
4
Direct salesand distribution
 Full-servicepersonalized customer interaction
o Stella & Dot can reach customers through social networks and sales
representatives
 More knowledge about customers’ needs and desires
WEAKNESSES
No retail outlets
 Customers cannot try on items and products if there are not any trunk shows
 Difficulty toreturn products
 Specialty jewelers are losing current market share to retailers, wholesalers, and
manufacturers (Gaille, 2013)
Expensesand costs
 Stella & Dot pay a 20% to 30% commission to their Stylists (PrivCo,2015)
 Training representatives is an expensive process (New EraConsulting, 2015)
 Sales costs for design and materials
o Use of sterling silverand semi-precious stones (Stella & Dot, 2015)
o Stella & Dot manufactures and designs its products (Stella & Dot, 2015)
o Maintaining and managing website and inventory foronline store
Small businessunits
 Jewelry expense forhouseholds is typically $167annually (ESRI,2015)
 Stella & Dot sells costume jewelry not fine jewelry
o Costume jewelry is 12% of the market share, while fine jewelry is 88% of the
market share forjewelry (International Euromonitor,2014)
ENVIRONMENTALSCAN
5
OPPORTUNITIES
Multiple unuseddistributionchannels inthe U.S.
 Currently, Stella & Dotonly does online sales and peer-to-peer sales (Womens Wear Daily,
2011)
 Stella & Dot does not use any retail outlets or physicalstores (PrivCo,2014)
Environmentallyandsociallyaware market
 Today,social and political concerns are serious factorsconsidered when purchasing fine
jewelry (Polygon,2014)
 Gem mining is a major concern in environmental studies; conflictminerals (gold), and
blood diamonds are one of the main issues considered by consumers (Source Intelligence,
2014)
 Fashion jewelry is mainly produced by artificially-craftedmaterials like acrylic,sterling
silver,brass, rhinestones, etc., whichbrings the new waveof social and environmentally
friendly customers
Global market: Emergingeconomies
 Emerging economies are expected to grow twoto three times faster than developed
nations (Forbes, 2015)
 High GPDper capita, retail sales increasing year by year, and continuous growth(CNBC,
2014)
 Emerging economies include Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Indonesia, etc.
(Forbes, 2015)
THREATS
Counterfeitproducts
 Customers look forlow cost alternatives
 The number of IPRseizures reached 23,140 in 2014 (CBP Public Affairs, 2015)
 Counterfeits not only deprive revenues forthe company but also dilute its brand image
(Marketline, 2015)
ENVIRONMENTALSCAN
6
IncreasingLabour Wages
 The labor cost for companies is rising
o Tight labour markets, increased overtime,government mandated increases in
minimum wages, and a higher proportion of full-time employees are increasing
labour costs (Marketline, 2015)
 Higher cost of living is increasing the rates of wages across the country
o Wage rate in the US, whichremained at $5.15 per hour since 1998, increased to
$5.85 per hour in 2008, increased to $6.55 per hour in 2009, and to $7.25 per
hour in 2010 (Marketline,2015)
o See Appendix B for the minimum wage increases in the past year in different
states
 Increasing wages can reduce the profit margin
Dangerous Chemicals
 Research from the Ecology Center found the lead, cadmium, chromium, and mercury
levels are higher than recommended, in a sample fromthree retailer’s fashion jewelry
(Daily Mail, 2012)
 Fast spread of communicationcan stop customers from purchasing products, as they will
link Stella and Dot’s jewelry with the chemical founds in the fashion jewelry
TARGET MARKET
7
Stella & Dot’s primary market is middle-aged American Caucasian women.In order to further
expand Stella & Dot’s well established direct sales model, wewill need to expand current reach
and become more accessible to the normal consumer.
GEOGRAPHIC
Stella & Dot should focuson the US market, trying to capture the 20 main cities forretailing
(Forbes, 2010), see Appendix A for listed cities.
DEMOGRAPHIC
The main demographic forjewelry and apparel is Caucasian women in the age range of 35 and 55
years. The individuals in this market have an average income of $78,000 and spend on average of
$750 per yearbetween jewelry and apparel ( U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2012).
PSYCHOGRAPHIC
Out of the identified market, 32% prefer to shop via methods that are not online (PwC,2014).
The reason forusing retail locations is the desire to receiveproductimmediately, avoid shipping
costs, and the ability to physically handle the product beforepurchasing (PwC,2014).
MARKET VALUES
Stella & Dot’s core conceptof empowering and inspiring women should remain intact to be
socially responsible. The solution must not negatively impact the current distribution method of
direct sales through Stylists.
MARKET SIZE
Utilizing the total population of Caucasian womenbetween 35 and 55 years, whichis 40 million
women, and taking away the online segment, leaves a potential market of 8.96 million (Census
Bureau, 2010). In order to accomplish a revenueof $500 million by 2021, Stella & Dotwill need
to acquire at least 6,700 women.
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
8
The competition Stella & Dot faces is both direct and indirect distribution channels within the
jewelry and apparel market.
DIRECTCOMPETITOR
Directcompetitors are companies that are competing directly with Stella & Dot,and their current
distribution model.
Table 2: Stella & Dot’s Top 5 Direct Competitors
Direct
Competitor
Chloe +
Isabel
Lia Sophia
Silpada
Designs
Origami Owl
Jewels by Park
Lane Inc.
Most
Expensive
Item(USD)
$188 $118 $329 $54 $769
Least
Expensive
Item(USD)
$18 $3 $3.50 $5 $4
MedianPrice
(USD)
$72 $89 $89 $22 $95
Revenue(USD) $0.36 million
$121.9
million
$164 million $250 million $179.9 million
Market
Share(%)
0.01% 4.3% 5.5% 8.3% 6%
Distribution
Strategy
Online +
Personal
Merchandiser
Online Outlet
+ Designer
(Closing)
Online +
Personal
Representative
Online + Personal
Designer
Online +
Personal
Representative
As seen in Table 2, weare establishing directcompetitors as the companies that sell fashion
jewelry and base their distribution strategy in direct selling and online retail.
Origami Owlhas the greatest share of the market, targeting their segment based on a lowerprice
strategy and Jewelsby ParkLane has the highest prices.
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
9
INDIRECTCOMPETITOR
Fine jewelry is more than half the market of purchased jewelry with 36.6 billion items (Golan,
2015). Fine jewelry is still an option forcustomers to consider while buying jewelry.
Table 3: Stella & Dot’s Top 5 Indirect Competitors
Tiffany Zales Kay BlueNile Helzberg
Distribution
Strategy
Online +
Retail
Online +
Retail
Online +
Retail
Online Online +
Retail
Sales(USD) $1,805
million
$1,888
million
$4,209
million
$488 million $692 million
Main
Product
Rings Diamonds Rings Diamonds Diamonds
Market
Share
5.4% 5.6% 13% 1.4% 1.9%
In Table 3, wecan see overallrevenue in fine jewelry is approximately 9 times greater than
fashion jewelry.Kay earns the most revenue, in comparison toother competitors.
STELLA & DOT
Stella & Dot stands close to Origami Owlwith an 8.3% share with $250 million in revenue (as we
assumed before) but presents a higher valueproduct.
Stella & Dot’s Stylist have a better performanceper person, as 30,000 generate almost the same
revenue as Origami Owl’s team of 50,000 designers (Forbes, 2014).
ALTERNATIVES
10
Alternative1 – Indirect Distribution
Alternative 1 is to completely re-haul Stella & Dot’s current distribution model fromdirect sales
through Stylists towell-established brands and retailers such as Macy’s and Nordstrom.
ADVANTAGES
 Refocuson production of products
 Reduce amount of interactions Stella & Dot needs to manage
 Easier to manage whilescaling revenue growth
DISADVANTAGES
 Less controlof the representation of Stella & Dot’s products
 Alienates the Stylists and current customer base
 Completely revamping a business model is a highly risky strategy
OVERVIEW
For our target market, the ease of access to the products, and the more standardized approach to
sales is potentially appealing. As stated earlier, 32% of women between the ages of 35-55 do not
use the internet when making jewelry purchases (PwC,2014). By modifying our distribution
method and utilizing multiple retail channels, Stella & Dot can expand its production and improve
relations by reducing the number of interactions they deal with, to reach their sales goal of $500
million in annual sales.
ALTERNATIVES
11
Alternative2 – Hybrid Distribution
Alternative 2 is to combine Stella & Dot’s current distribution method withthe addition of major
retail outlets such as Nordstrom and Macy’s.This allows the target customers, middle-aged
Caucasian women, to choose whichevermethod of purchase is most convenientto them.
ADVANTAGES
 Adding more distributers, increases potential to capture the fullmarket
 Potentialgrowth of revenue is very high
 Providesa physical location forwomen to go, handle, and try on the product before
committing to a purchase, without having to waitfor trunk shows
DISADVANTAGES
 Balancing channel conflictswhen dealing with multiple distributors is very difficult
 Additional marketing channels are very expensive
o Need to hire staff to manage and maintain the channels
o Need to either provide or accommodate shipping in mass amounts to retail
locations
 Could potentially harm the income and negatively impact the women Stella & Dotare
trying to empower and inspire
OVERVIEW
Using the current established direct sales distribution model Stella & Dot has, and the indirect
distribution of major retail outlets, the company can capture their target market. Current
research shows that 32% of womenwant an alternate method of purchasing products aside from
the internet (PwC,2014). Currently, Stella & Dot only has 3.9% of their sales at fairs, exhibitions,
and malls (DirectSellers Association, 2015). By using these additional channels of distribution,
they can increase their revenue to reach their target of a $500 million increase in revenue within
the next 5 years.
ALTERNATIVES
12
Alternative3 – Direct Distribution
Alternative 3 is forStella & Dot to open physical retail outlets using selectivedistribution and a
full personal service. The specialized retail outlets can workside-by-side withthe Stylists.
ADVANTAGES
 67% of jewelry shoppers prefer buying in-store (PwC,2014)
 Full controloverservice representation since it is operated by Stella & Dot
 Omni-channel approach forbetter customer experience
DISADVANTAGES
 Increased operational expenses due to additional salaries and on-site software
 Threat of reduced sales forthe Stylists
 Additional distribution channels make inventory management more difficult
OVERVIEW
Stella & Dot can create retail outlets toallow more sales channels forthe customers without
harming their Stylists. All distribution and sales will be handled directly by Stella & Dot, allowing
complete controloverthe representation of the brand. This gives the most potential to capture
the goal of 67,000 additional customers per year.
SOLUTION
13
We recommend Stella & Dot to strategically expand its direct sales model, and open retail stores
to capture the interest and appeal to middle-aged American women. Therefore,by adjusting its
current distribution strategy, Stella & Dot willachieve $500 million in revenue by 2021.
ARGUMENT
 Specialty jewelry sales were $33.6 billion in 2014 (Golan, 2015)
o 82% is done in-store (Golan, 2015)
o 7% is done through online sales (Golan, 2015)
o 10% is done through direct sellers (Ibis World, 2015)
 48% of people research online before buying jewelry (PwC, 2014)
o 67% will buy in-store compared to 26% online (PwC, 2014)
The main reasons why people chose to buy in-store instead of online:
Figure 1: People Who Purchased In-Store Rather Than Online (PWC, 2014)
As seen in Figure 1, 73% people decided to buy in a physicalstore overonline. Among the top
three reasons, avoid to pay for delivery and immediate access to the purchase, are reasons why
consumers prefer to buy in a physicalstore rather than online (PwC,2014).
SOLUTION
14
OBJECTIVES
 The overallmarket value is based on the average jewelry sales of $750 annually per
person (BLS Expenditure, 2011)
 Utilize the new trend of “webrooming”
o 73% of customers will research online before buyingin store (PwC,2014)
 Physicalstores will help reach 22% of the 35 to 55 year-oldCaucasian women, whodo
not buy jewelry online and prefer in-store shopping forno shipping fees and delivery time
(Ibis World, 2015)
o Stella & Dot willcapture 1% of their yearly spending in jewelry of $50 million, a
market increase of 67,000 women yearly.Achievingthe goal of a 100% increase in
revenue of $500 million by 2021 (Appendix C)
 Having a physical store will lowerthe 30% return rate (averagefor the fashion industry)
to 20%, by decreasing the poor fit returns (70% of totalreturns); therefore,decreasing
costs (Neasle, 2013)
 Physicalstores will havean objectivetorefer to a Stylist, for a fully customized experience
and to avoidchannel conflict.Hence, it willalign with Stella & Dot’s “our mission and our
passion for creating flexible entrepreneurship forwomen” (Herrin, 2014)
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
15
1-2 YEAR
1. Use prime retail locations tomaximize potential customer traffic
2. Design and plan a good layoutforretail outlets that represent Stella & Dot’s brand’s goal
of empowering and inspiring women
3. Organize the retail sales model to empowerthe Stylists, use a personalized one-on-one
service, and preventa negative impact on their job
4. Prices willremain the same as the online store
5. Introduce a recommendation system, allowing customers that use retail outlets to
recommend their Stylists
6. Stella & Dot products willworkby time-based competition
7. Physicalstores will create a better experience to casual shoppers and customers that
prefer immediate products. Also, it will generate loyalty by recommending Stylists togive
more value and personalized experiences to the clients
8. Open 20 pilot stores across large cities in the USA forretailing (Forbes, 2010):
 Phoenix, AZ
 Los Angeles, CA
 San Diego, CA
 San Francisco,CA
 San Jose, CA
 Denver,CO
 Chicago, IL
 Indianapolis, IN
 Jacksonville,FL
 Boston, MA
 Charlotte, NC
 New York,NY
 Columbus, OH
 Philadelphia, PA
 Nashville, TN
 Austin, TX
 Houston, TX
 San Antonio, TX
 Dallas, TX
 Seattle, WA
Refer to Appendix A for cities’ data.
Costs and revenue for1-2 year implementationplan:
Total opening costs: $30,834 per location
Extra monthly costs: $8,997 per location (additional cost forin-store strategy)
Average monthly revenue first twoyears: $29,761 per store
Total revenuefirst twoyears: $33,600,000
Refer to Appendix C for costs and sales breakdown.
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
16
3-5 YEAR
1. Expand to additional retail outlets based off the success of pilot stores
2. Long-term goal to havemultiple retail locationswithin each state
3. Having nearby retail outlets will allow women to havea fully customizedexperience. The
referral program allows Stylists to still recommend products to their friends and families
and doesn’t impact the current model negatively
4. Open 140 stores across the main cities and malls
Costs and revenue for3-5 year implementationplan:
Total extra costs yearly (all stores): $1,259,580 (additional costfor in-store strategy)
Total revenueyearly (all stores): $260,400,000
Total revenueyearly (Stylists): $412,500,000 (assuming a 13% growth(PrivCo,2015))
Total revenuein 2021: $672,900,000
Refer to Appendix C for costs and sales breakdown.
BACKUP PLAN
If Stella & Dot does not achieve100% growthin revenue by 2021, that is $500 million dollars,
alternative 2: hybrid distribution willbe implemented, supporting our solution.
We will reassess the selectivedistribution and go for a broader scope of distribution channels.
Utilizing both direct and indirect distribution will allow Stella & Dot to reach the maximum
amount of customers, thus developing a horizontal marketing system withNordstrom and
J.C. Penny.
COURSE CONCEPTS
17
Channel Conflict – Primary goal of our solution is to create an environment for the Stylists and
retailer that does not create conflictbetweenthe distribution channels.
Customer Value – Main focuswhile developing the case.
DirectDistribution – Primary alternative and solution is a direct distribution method.
Hybrid Distribution – Second alternative is hybridizing the direct and indirect distribution
models.
Indirect Distribution – First alternativeis indirect distribution.
Levelof Service – Full service is our type of service in directdistribution.
Marketing Mix – Followed the four Ps in the implementation of the solution.
Secondary Research – Used throughout the case using library resources (PrivCo,Business Source
Complete), retail surveys,and jewelry statistics.
SelectiveDistribution – Retail outlets managed and distributed, our primary solution, is a formof
selectivedistribution.
SMART – Guideline toidentify the problem to solve.
SWOTAnalysis – Environmentalscan of the internal strengths and weaknesses as well as the
external threats and opportunities of Stella & Dot.
Target Market – Identifying our target market by geographic, demographic, psychographic,and
behavioral.
REFERENCES
18
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012, September). ConsumerExpenditureSurvey.Retrievedfrom
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/cex/2011/Standard/age.pdf
CBP Public Affairs. (2015, April 2). CBP, ICE HSI Report$1.2Billionin CounterfeitSeizures in 2014.
Retrieved 11 18, 2015, from US Customs and Border Protection:
http://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/2015-04-02-000000/cbp-ice-
hsi-report-12-billion-counterfeit-seizures
Census Bureau. (2010). Ageand SexComposition.RetrievedfromUnited States Census Bureau:
http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf
CNBC. (2014, June 20). 10 BestEmergingMarkets forRetail.Retrieved fromCNBC:
http://www.cnbc.com/2014/06/20/retails-10-best-developing-markets.html?slide=11
Daily Mail. (2012, March 19). Pretty, shinyand a majorhealthrisk: Howscientists havefoundhigh
levelsof dangerouschemicalsincostumejewellery.RetrievedfromDaily Mail UK:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2117157/Claires-Forever-21-H-M-costume-
jewellery-contains-high-levels-dangerous-chemicals.html
DirectSellers Association. (2015). IndustryStats. Retrievedfrom DSA: http://dsa.ca/the-
industry/industry-stats/
eMarketer. (2015, August 20). Brick-and-MortarRemainsBestFitforApparelShoppers.Retrieved
from eMarketer: http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1012886&ecid=MX1086
Ernst & Young.(2015, July 01). JessicaHerrin,Stella & Dot:Entrepreneurshiponherownterms.
Retrieved 11 11, 2015, from EY:http://www.ey.com/GL/en/Services/Strategic-Growth-
Markets/ey-exceptional-july-december-2015-2-jessica-herrin-stella-and-dot
ESRI. (2015, January 01). WhereAre the BigSpenders onThings ThatBling?Retrieved 11 10,
2015, fromESRI: http://www.esri.com/data/esri_data/jewelry-map
Forbes. (2010, December 13). America’s 25 BestCities ForShopping.RetrievedfromForbes:
http://www.forbes.com/2010/12/13/best-cities-for-shopping-forbes-woman-time-
retail-walmart-sales-tax_slide_1.html
Forbes. (2014, October22). $250 MillionForA 14-Year-Old's BigIdea:OrigamiOwl.Retrieved from
Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/sites/karstenstrauss/2014/10/22/250-million-for-a-
14-year-olds-big-idea-origami-owl/
REFERENCES
19
Forbes. (2014, July 25). Retail.Retrieved fromForbes:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/barbarathau/2014/07/25/report-amazons-got-nothing-
on-brick-and-mortar-stores/
Forbes. (2015). WhyInvestin EmergingMarkets? RetrievedfromForbes.
Gaille, B. (2013, October26). 14 Jewelry IndustryStatistics andTrends.Retrieved11 10, 2015,
from Brandon Gaille Marketing Expert & Blogmaster: http://brandongaille.com/14-
jewelry-industry-statistics-and-trends/
Golan, E. (2015, March). The2014US JewelryState of theMarket Report.Retrievedfrom Edahn
Golan: http://edahngolan.com/Docs/Edahn_Golan-
2015_US_State_of_the_Jewelry_Market.pdf
Herrin, J. (2014, December 11). Stella & Dot's Business Booms, But Will It Go Public?(Bloomerg,
Interviewer)
Ibis World. (2015, February). DirectSelling of Jewelry& Accessories intheUS: MarketResearch
Report.Retrievedfrom Ibis World: http://www.ibisworld.com/industry/direct-selling-of-
jewelry-accessories.html
International Euromonitor.(2014, November25). Stateof the PersonalAccessories Marketin
2015.Retrieved 11 11, 2015, fromLinkedIn:
http://www.slideshare.net/Euromonitor/personal-accessories-2015
Los Angeles Times. (2014, February 09). Stella &Dot FounderSawaWay to Dress Up DirectSales.
Retrieved 11 12, 2015, from LA TImes:
http://articles.latimes.com/2014/feb/09/business/la-fi-himi-jessica-herrin-20140209
Marketline. (2015). Avon ProductsInc. SWOT Analysis. Marketline.
Miller, R. K. (2006). JEWELRY.InR. K. Miller, ApparelMarketResearchHandbook(pp.70-73).
Morrison, K. (2014, November 28). 81%of Shoppers ConductOnlineResearchBeforeBuying.
Retrieved fromSocial Times: http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/81-shoppers-
conduct-online-research-making-purchase-infographic/208527
Neasle, E. (2013, May).TheSearch for Simplicity. Retrievedfrom SIASTO:
https://blog.siasto.com/the-search-for-simplicity-iii
New EraConsulting. (2015). Directv. Manufacturers’Representative:HowBestto OrganizeaSales
Team.Retrieved 11 18, 2015, from New EraConsulting:
http://www.neweraconsulting.com/direct-v-mfg.htm
REFERENCES
20
NPD.(2014, March 27). NPD ReportsOnlineSales of Women’s Accessories Increased7PercentIn
OtherwiseFlat Market.Retrieved 11 09, 2015, fromNPD:
https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/press-releases/npd-reports-online-
sales-of-womens-accessories-increased-7-percent-in-otherwise-flat-market/
Polygon.(2014,March). RetailJewelryIndustryin the U.S. 2014.Retrieved from Polygon:
http://www.polygon.net/jwl/public/documents/resource-center/industry-
reports/Retail%20Jewelry%20Industry%20in%20America_Report%202014-PDF-
final.pdf
PrivCo.(2014). M&ADealReport. PrivCo.
PrivCo.(2015). Stella& DotLLC.Retrieved from PrivCo:http://0-
www.privco.com.innopac.lib.bcit.ca/private-company/stella-and-dot
PwC.(2014, October).TotalRetailV SurveyUnited States (US).Retrieved fromPWC:
http://www.pwc.com/us/en/retail-consumer/publications/assets/total-retail-2014-
us.pdf
Source Intelligence. (2014). What AreConflict Minerals.Retrieved fromSource Intelligence:
http://www.sourceintelligence.com/what-are-conflict-minerals/
Stella & Dot. (2015, January 01). AboutUs. Retrieved 11 16, 2015, from Stella & Dot:
http://www.stelladot.com/about
Stella & Dot. (2015). BirthstoneCharms.Retrieved11 18, 2015, fromStella & Dot:
http://www.stelladot.com/shop/en_ca/p/birthstone-charm-sterling-silver
Stella & Dot. (2015, January 01). TrunkShowFaqs.Retrieved 11 14, 2015, from Stella & Dot:
http://www.stelladot.com/trunkshow/faqs
Stella & Dot. (2015). US Shipping& Delivery.Retrieved fromStella & Dot:
http://www.stelladot.com/help/shipping-rates-us
Wilson, D. (2015). Stella & DotCase Study. Stellaand DotDistributionCase .Burnaby, British
Columbia, Canada: BCIT.
Womens Wear Daily.(2011). Stella& DotExpandOffer. Retrieved fromWWD:
http://wwd.com/accessories-news/fashion-scoops/stella-dot-expands-into-family-of-
brands-7811877/
APPENDIX
21
APPENDIX A
Table 4: Top 20 Cities for Retailing (Forbes, 2010)
APPENDIX B
The minimum wage increases in the past year in different states:
 Arizona $7.9 in 2014 to $8.05 in 2015 (Marketline, 2015)
 Florida $7.93 in 2014 to$8.05 in 2015 (Marketline, 2015)
 Colorado $8 in 2014 to $8.23 in 2015 (Marketline, 2015)
 Alaska $7.75 in 2014 to $8.75 in 2015 (Marketline, 2015)
 Washington $9.32 in 2014 to $9.47 in 2015 (Marketline, 2015)
 Oregon $9.1 in 2014 to $9.25 in 2015 (Marketline, 2015)
Cities Retail Locations Shopping Centers Sales Tax Women Population
Phoenix, AZ 11,992.00 40 9.30% 765,455
Los Angelex, CA 40,170.00 15 9.75% 1,972,290
San Diego, CA 9,948.00 22 8.75% 683,595
San Francisco, CA 14,412.00 9 9.50% 504,845
San Jose, CA 5,421.00 13 9.25% 504,845
Denver, CO 8,476.00 11 7.72% 420,263
Chicago, IL 30,234.00 22 9.75% 331,500
Indianapolis, IN 5,955.00 18 7.00% 438,778
Jacksonville, FL 5,190.00 25 7.00% 439,492
Boston, MA 17,098.00 7 6.25% 341,716
Charlotte, NC 6,225.00 21 8.25% 418,748
New York, NY 75,619.00 9 8.88% 4,332,072
Columbus, OH 5,712.00 32 7.75% 428,010
Philadelphia, PA 20,970.00 29 8.00% 823,786
Nashville, TN 5,955.00 18 7.00% 331,676
Austin, TX 5,347.00 31 8.25% 450,903
Houston, TX 16,938.00 54 8.25% 1,115,271
Dallas, TX 19,069.00 28 8.25% 640,500
San Antonio, TX 5,913.00 41 8.13% 735,589
Seattle, WA 11,549.00 9 8.80% 334,171
APPENDIX
22
APPENDIX C
35-55 Us Women White women In Store buyers Average spending Total spending Needed Goal Revenue Summary Description
40,000,000.00 70% 32% $250,000,000 $286,111.11 Per Store
40,000,000.00 28,000,000.00 8,960,000.00 $750 $6,720,000,000 1% $50,000,000 $35,000.00 Per month
22% 66,666.67 People
Sales associates Sales Salary Total Associates Regional Manager Average Rent Utilities Other expenses Total
2 $1,760 $3,520 $2,500 $1,877 $300 $800 $8,997
Spread cost 1 year Expense $359,880
5 year Expense $1,619,460
Rent and Operation Arrengements Miscellaneous IT Marketing Public Relations Total Costs
$4,899 $7,650 $1,560 $6,165 $8,900 $1,670 $30,844
# Stores 2 year 40 $1,400,000.00 $16,800,000.00 $33,600,000.00
# Stores 5 year 180 $6,300,000.00 $75,600,000.00 $226,800,000.00
$260,400,000.00
Revenue 2021 Stylists 250000000 412500000 $672,900,000.00
OPERATING COSTS
SALES
OPENING COSTS
Table 5: Sales, Operating Costs, and Opening Costs

More Related Content

What's hot

Target Supply Chain Strategy Case Analysis
Target Supply Chain Strategy Case AnalysisTarget Supply Chain Strategy Case Analysis
Target Supply Chain Strategy Case AnalysisJosh Nutter
 
Brand positioning model (Dove case study)
Brand positioning model (Dove case study)Brand positioning model (Dove case study)
Brand positioning model (Dove case study)An Le K.
 
Reckitt Benckiser Case Study | Campus winners
Reckitt Benckiser Case Study | Campus winnersReckitt Benckiser Case Study | Campus winners
Reckitt Benckiser Case Study | Campus winnersTarun Gupta
 
Developing Olay in France skincare market
Developing Olay in France skincare marketDeveloping Olay in France skincare market
Developing Olay in France skincare marketKien Nguyen
 
Market Research on Nestle Maggi
Market Research on Nestle MaggiMarket Research on Nestle Maggi
Market Research on Nestle MaggiSubhradeep Mitra
 
207285085 classic-knitwear-case-study
207285085 classic-knitwear-case-study207285085 classic-knitwear-case-study
207285085 classic-knitwear-case-studyhomeworkping7
 
Macy's Presentation
Macy's Presentation Macy's Presentation
Macy's Presentation Emanuel Ruiz
 
Raga & Tanishq Symbolic Linkages Between Brands
Raga & Tanishq  Symbolic Linkages Between BrandsRaga & Tanishq  Symbolic Linkages Between Brands
Raga & Tanishq Symbolic Linkages Between BrandsCA Narinder Jit Singh
 
Fashion channel case study ppt by ikram ullah kakar
Fashion channel case study ppt by ikram ullah kakarFashion channel case study ppt by ikram ullah kakar
Fashion channel case study ppt by ikram ullah kakarIkramullah Panezai
 
Shopper Stop marketing ananlysis
Shopper Stop marketing ananlysisShopper Stop marketing ananlysis
Shopper Stop marketing ananlysispgsf1550
 
Marketing Plan for Fabindia, Ahmedabad
Marketing Plan for Fabindia, AhmedabadMarketing Plan for Fabindia, Ahmedabad
Marketing Plan for Fabindia, AhmedabadNikita Sanghvi
 
Zara Marketing Campaign Design
Zara Marketing Campaign DesignZara Marketing Campaign Design
Zara Marketing Campaign DesignCarmen Neghina
 
Big Bazaar Retail Strategy
Big Bazaar Retail Strategy Big Bazaar Retail Strategy
Big Bazaar Retail Strategy sohel jamadar
 
Sephora-Presentation
Sephora-PresentationSephora-Presentation
Sephora-PresentationNhan Pham
 
Colgate –palmolive
Colgate –palmoliveColgate –palmolive
Colgate –palmoliveAnand Batra
 

What's hot (20)

Target Supply Chain Strategy Case Analysis
Target Supply Chain Strategy Case AnalysisTarget Supply Chain Strategy Case Analysis
Target Supply Chain Strategy Case Analysis
 
Strategic Planning for Sephora
Strategic Planning for SephoraStrategic Planning for Sephora
Strategic Planning for Sephora
 
Brand positioning model (Dove case study)
Brand positioning model (Dove case study)Brand positioning model (Dove case study)
Brand positioning model (Dove case study)
 
Reckitt Benckiser Case Study | Campus winners
Reckitt Benckiser Case Study | Campus winnersReckitt Benckiser Case Study | Campus winners
Reckitt Benckiser Case Study | Campus winners
 
Developing Olay in France skincare market
Developing Olay in France skincare marketDeveloping Olay in France skincare market
Developing Olay in France skincare market
 
Fmcg sectoral
Fmcg sectoralFmcg sectoral
Fmcg sectoral
 
Market Research on Nestle Maggi
Market Research on Nestle MaggiMarket Research on Nestle Maggi
Market Research on Nestle Maggi
 
207285085 classic-knitwear-case-study
207285085 classic-knitwear-case-study207285085 classic-knitwear-case-study
207285085 classic-knitwear-case-study
 
Macy's Presentation
Macy's Presentation Macy's Presentation
Macy's Presentation
 
Raga & Tanishq Symbolic Linkages Between Brands
Raga & Tanishq  Symbolic Linkages Between BrandsRaga & Tanishq  Symbolic Linkages Between Brands
Raga & Tanishq Symbolic Linkages Between Brands
 
Fashion channel case study ppt by ikram ullah kakar
Fashion channel case study ppt by ikram ullah kakarFashion channel case study ppt by ikram ullah kakar
Fashion channel case study ppt by ikram ullah kakar
 
Shopper Stop marketing ananlysis
Shopper Stop marketing ananlysisShopper Stop marketing ananlysis
Shopper Stop marketing ananlysis
 
Marketing Plan for Fabindia, Ahmedabad
Marketing Plan for Fabindia, AhmedabadMarketing Plan for Fabindia, Ahmedabad
Marketing Plan for Fabindia, Ahmedabad
 
Sephora
SephoraSephora
Sephora
 
Zara Marketing Campaign Design
Zara Marketing Campaign DesignZara Marketing Campaign Design
Zara Marketing Campaign Design
 
Nappadori research
Nappadori researchNappadori research
Nappadori research
 
Big Bazaar Retail Strategy
Big Bazaar Retail Strategy Big Bazaar Retail Strategy
Big Bazaar Retail Strategy
 
Sephora-Presentation
Sephora-PresentationSephora-Presentation
Sephora-Presentation
 
How to win Cesim: Business Simulation Games
How to win  Cesim: Business Simulation Games How to win  Cesim: Business Simulation Games
How to win Cesim: Business Simulation Games
 
Colgate –palmolive
Colgate –palmoliveColgate –palmolive
Colgate –palmolive
 

Similar to Expanding Distribution for Growth

International Marketing Launch Pitch
International Marketing Launch PitchInternational Marketing Launch Pitch
International Marketing Launch PitchMarlène Aimar
 
Emerging Consumer Survey 2015 (9 Key Countries Emerging Economies: Brazil, Ch...
Emerging Consumer Survey 2015 (9 Key Countries Emerging Economies: Brazil, Ch...Emerging Consumer Survey 2015 (9 Key Countries Emerging Economies: Brazil, Ch...
Emerging Consumer Survey 2015 (9 Key Countries Emerging Economies: Brazil, Ch...Henky Hendranantha
 
emerging-consumer-survey-2015
emerging-consumer-survey-2015emerging-consumer-survey-2015
emerging-consumer-survey-2015Ashlee Ramanathan
 
eCommerce Fashion industry Report - 2018
eCommerce Fashion industry Report - 2018eCommerce Fashion industry Report - 2018
eCommerce Fashion industry Report - 2018Cocktail Marketing
 
bcgxaltagamma-true-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdf
bcgxaltagamma-true-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdfbcgxaltagamma-true-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdf
bcgxaltagamma-true-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdfIbrahimBaxisli1
 
true-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdf
true-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdftrue-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdf
true-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdfTorainYang
 
WGSNFutures.com: Vision 2030 White Paper
WGSNFutures.com: Vision 2030 White PaperWGSNFutures.com: Vision 2030 White Paper
WGSNFutures.com: Vision 2030 White Paperpaulcoxhill
 
Consumer trends and the way they affect retail
Consumer trends and the way they affect retailConsumer trends and the way they affect retail
Consumer trends and the way they affect retailAlain Thys
 
Consumer trends and the way they affect retail
Consumer trends and the way they affect retailConsumer trends and the way they affect retail
Consumer trends and the way they affect retailFuturelab
 
The New Face of Retail: Retail and Consumer Trends Reshaping the Landscape
The New Face of Retail: Retail and Consumer Trends Reshaping the LandscapeThe New Face of Retail: Retail and Consumer Trends Reshaping the Landscape
The New Face of Retail: Retail and Consumer Trends Reshaping the LandscapeL.E.K. Consulting
 
China Luxury Goods - Dec'13
China Luxury Goods - Dec'13China Luxury Goods - Dec'13
China Luxury Goods - Dec'13shushmul
 
33.1.021 LOreal Global Brand Local Knowledge Case Study
33.1.021  LOreal Global Brand Local Knowledge Case Study33.1.021  LOreal Global Brand Local Knowledge Case Study
33.1.021 LOreal Global Brand Local Knowledge Case StudyClark Cledwyn Bagaipo
 
Primark’s Background Primark retails a diverse range o.docx
Primark’s Background Primark retails a diverse range o.docxPrimark’s Background Primark retails a diverse range o.docx
Primark’s Background Primark retails a diverse range o.docxstilliegeorgiana
 
BRIC Middle Class
BRIC Middle ClassBRIC Middle Class
BRIC Middle Classvameyer
 
DESIGN:RETAIL FORUM: In-Store Technology As Retailtainment: Bright Shiny Obje...
DESIGN:RETAIL FORUM: In-Store Technology As Retailtainment: Bright Shiny Obje...DESIGN:RETAIL FORUM: In-Store Technology As Retailtainment: Bright Shiny Obje...
DESIGN:RETAIL FORUM: In-Store Technology As Retailtainment: Bright Shiny Obje...Deborah Weinswig
 
Luxury and Cosmetics Market and Consumer Trends
Luxury and Cosmetics Market and Consumer Trends Luxury and Cosmetics Market and Consumer Trends
Luxury and Cosmetics Market and Consumer Trends Chris Cadden
 
Od4961 lipstick manufacturing industry report
Od4961 lipstick manufacturing industry reportOd4961 lipstick manufacturing industry report
Od4961 lipstick manufacturing industry reportReggie Aspelund
 
Indiafmcgsectorreportaugust2013 140201042859-phpapp01
Indiafmcgsectorreportaugust2013 140201042859-phpapp01Indiafmcgsectorreportaugust2013 140201042859-phpapp01
Indiafmcgsectorreportaugust2013 140201042859-phpapp01Supa Buoy
 

Similar to Expanding Distribution for Growth (20)

International Marketing Launch Pitch
International Marketing Launch PitchInternational Marketing Launch Pitch
International Marketing Launch Pitch
 
Emerging Consumer Survey 2015 (9 Key Countries Emerging Economies: Brazil, Ch...
Emerging Consumer Survey 2015 (9 Key Countries Emerging Economies: Brazil, Ch...Emerging Consumer Survey 2015 (9 Key Countries Emerging Economies: Brazil, Ch...
Emerging Consumer Survey 2015 (9 Key Countries Emerging Economies: Brazil, Ch...
 
emerging-consumer-survey-2015
emerging-consumer-survey-2015emerging-consumer-survey-2015
emerging-consumer-survey-2015
 
eCommerce Fashion industry Report - 2018
eCommerce Fashion industry Report - 2018eCommerce Fashion industry Report - 2018
eCommerce Fashion industry Report - 2018
 
Brand Audit - Target
Brand Audit - TargetBrand Audit - Target
Brand Audit - Target
 
bcgxaltagamma-true-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdf
bcgxaltagamma-true-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdfbcgxaltagamma-true-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdf
bcgxaltagamma-true-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdf
 
true-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdf
true-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdftrue-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdf
true-luxury-global-consumer-insight-2021.pdf
 
THE VISION 2030 by WGSN
THE VISION 2030 by WGSNTHE VISION 2030 by WGSN
THE VISION 2030 by WGSN
 
WGSNFutures.com: Vision 2030 White Paper
WGSNFutures.com: Vision 2030 White PaperWGSNFutures.com: Vision 2030 White Paper
WGSNFutures.com: Vision 2030 White Paper
 
Consumer trends and the way they affect retail
Consumer trends and the way they affect retailConsumer trends and the way they affect retail
Consumer trends and the way they affect retail
 
Consumer trends and the way they affect retail
Consumer trends and the way they affect retailConsumer trends and the way they affect retail
Consumer trends and the way they affect retail
 
The New Face of Retail: Retail and Consumer Trends Reshaping the Landscape
The New Face of Retail: Retail and Consumer Trends Reshaping the LandscapeThe New Face of Retail: Retail and Consumer Trends Reshaping the Landscape
The New Face of Retail: Retail and Consumer Trends Reshaping the Landscape
 
China Luxury Goods - Dec'13
China Luxury Goods - Dec'13China Luxury Goods - Dec'13
China Luxury Goods - Dec'13
 
33.1.021 LOreal Global Brand Local Knowledge Case Study
33.1.021  LOreal Global Brand Local Knowledge Case Study33.1.021  LOreal Global Brand Local Knowledge Case Study
33.1.021 LOreal Global Brand Local Knowledge Case Study
 
Primark’s Background Primark retails a diverse range o.docx
Primark’s Background Primark retails a diverse range o.docxPrimark’s Background Primark retails a diverse range o.docx
Primark’s Background Primark retails a diverse range o.docx
 
BRIC Middle Class
BRIC Middle ClassBRIC Middle Class
BRIC Middle Class
 
DESIGN:RETAIL FORUM: In-Store Technology As Retailtainment: Bright Shiny Obje...
DESIGN:RETAIL FORUM: In-Store Technology As Retailtainment: Bright Shiny Obje...DESIGN:RETAIL FORUM: In-Store Technology As Retailtainment: Bright Shiny Obje...
DESIGN:RETAIL FORUM: In-Store Technology As Retailtainment: Bright Shiny Obje...
 
Luxury and Cosmetics Market and Consumer Trends
Luxury and Cosmetics Market and Consumer Trends Luxury and Cosmetics Market and Consumer Trends
Luxury and Cosmetics Market and Consumer Trends
 
Od4961 lipstick manufacturing industry report
Od4961 lipstick manufacturing industry reportOd4961 lipstick manufacturing industry report
Od4961 lipstick manufacturing industry report
 
Indiafmcgsectorreportaugust2013 140201042859-phpapp01
Indiafmcgsectorreportaugust2013 140201042859-phpapp01Indiafmcgsectorreportaugust2013 140201042859-phpapp01
Indiafmcgsectorreportaugust2013 140201042859-phpapp01
 

Expanding Distribution for Growth

  • 1. TEAM A - ITMG 1B – MKTG 1102 Prepared for: MorganWestcott November 20, 2015 Presented by: Andrew Anderson A00925997 Daniil Kim A00969142 Diego Gonzalez A00961462 Kyle Mitchell A00967954 Navdeep Hehar (Nav) A00954116 Rahul Sandhu A00968360 Tsz Chiu Sum(Mickey) A00854893
  • 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS Problem Statement _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Key Findings and Assumptions ________________________________________________________________ 2 Environmental Analysis ________________________________________________________________________ 3 Target Market ___________________________________________________________________________________ 7 Competitive Analysis ___________________________________________________________________________ 8 Alternatives ____________________________________________________________________________________ 10 Solution _________________________________________________________________________________________13 Implementation Plan __________________________________________________________________________ 15 Course Concepts _______________________________________________________________________________ 17 References _____________________________________________________________________________________ 18 Appendix _______________________________________________________________________________________ 21
  • 3. PROBLEM STATEMENT 1 OVERVIEW OF SITUATION Stella & Dot has experienced rapid growthover the past 12 years, reaching over30,000 Stylists globally and over$200 million in sales. Stella & Dot is looking to go public within the next five years, and is aiming todouble their sales revenueprior to going public. Withoutcompromising the core integrity of the company, whichis empowering and inspiring women, Stella & Dot will need to find a way to expand their current distribution plan (Wilson, 2015). PROBLEMSTATEMENT The problem statement that our team identified is, “How can Stella & Dot modify or adjust its current distribution strategy and achieve$500 million in revenue by 2021?”
  • 4. KEY FINDINGS AND ASSUMPTIONS 2 Through research, our team found the followingkey findings and made the following assumptions: KEY FINDINGS  Stella & Dot’s standard shipping is $5.95 for10-day delivery,and its fastest shipping is $19.95 for 4-day shipping. Shipping for trunk shows workthe same as an online purchase (Stella & Dot,2015)  55% of shoppers who buy online prefer topurchase from a retailer witha physicalstore than an online store (Forbes, 2014)  62% of females would prefer to buy apparel in store, rather than online (eMarketer, 2015)  Stella & Dot’s revenue in 2012 is $200 million (Ernst& Young,2015), and its revenue in 2013 is $220 million (Los Angeles Times, 2014)  51% of shoppers don’t wantto wait to receivetheir item (Morrison, 2014)  Stella & Dot has three companies: Stella & Dot (jewelry and accessories), Ever(skin care), and Keep (collectives),wechose tofocus on Stella & Dot ASSUMPTIONS  Fashion, costume, and specialty jewelry belong to the same classification  Movements among specialty jewelry willimitate the fashion market  Stella & Dot’s behavior is categorized as an online retailer as its shipping procedures, shipping prices, and trunk shows frequency does not fillthe gap forin-store availability and experience  Trunk shows are classified as a personalized experience towardssocial selling, and filling the customer needs to try fashion products before buying  2014 revenue forStella & Dot is $250 million as its growthrate is 13.6% (PrivCo,2015)
  • 5. ENVIRONMENTALSCAN 3 Stella & Dot’s current environmental scan, internal strengths and weaknesses, and external threats and opportunities. Table 1: SWOT Analysis Strengths Weaknesses High growthrates Highly profitable business model Directsales distribution model No retail outlets Current expenses and costs Small business units Opportunities Threats Multiple unused distribution channels in the US Environmentally and socially aware market Global markets: Emerging economies Counterfeit products Increasing labour wages Dangerous chemicals in jewelry The next section willanalyze the Table 1 data in detail. STRENGTHS High growth rates  One year growthrate of 13.6% (PrivCo,2015)  Three year growthrate of 12.5% (PrivCo,2015)  Online women’s accessories sales grew 7% to$7.1 billion in the fiscalyear ending March 2014 (NPD,2014)  Three out of seven accessories categories haveexperienced double-digit dollar sales gains during the March2014 fiscal year(NPD,2014) o Bag sales accounting for24% of the women’s total accessories market, increased by 17% (NPD,2014) Highly profitable businessmodel  Stella & Dot’s revenue has been growing each year o 2012 $200 million (Ernst & Young, 2015) o 2013 $220 million (Los Angeles Times, 2014) o 2014 $250 million (assumption)
  • 6. ENVIRONMENTALSCAN 4 Direct salesand distribution  Full-servicepersonalized customer interaction o Stella & Dot can reach customers through social networks and sales representatives  More knowledge about customers’ needs and desires WEAKNESSES No retail outlets  Customers cannot try on items and products if there are not any trunk shows  Difficulty toreturn products  Specialty jewelers are losing current market share to retailers, wholesalers, and manufacturers (Gaille, 2013) Expensesand costs  Stella & Dot pay a 20% to 30% commission to their Stylists (PrivCo,2015)  Training representatives is an expensive process (New EraConsulting, 2015)  Sales costs for design and materials o Use of sterling silverand semi-precious stones (Stella & Dot, 2015) o Stella & Dot manufactures and designs its products (Stella & Dot, 2015) o Maintaining and managing website and inventory foronline store Small businessunits  Jewelry expense forhouseholds is typically $167annually (ESRI,2015)  Stella & Dot sells costume jewelry not fine jewelry o Costume jewelry is 12% of the market share, while fine jewelry is 88% of the market share forjewelry (International Euromonitor,2014)
  • 7. ENVIRONMENTALSCAN 5 OPPORTUNITIES Multiple unuseddistributionchannels inthe U.S.  Currently, Stella & Dotonly does online sales and peer-to-peer sales (Womens Wear Daily, 2011)  Stella & Dot does not use any retail outlets or physicalstores (PrivCo,2014) Environmentallyandsociallyaware market  Today,social and political concerns are serious factorsconsidered when purchasing fine jewelry (Polygon,2014)  Gem mining is a major concern in environmental studies; conflictminerals (gold), and blood diamonds are one of the main issues considered by consumers (Source Intelligence, 2014)  Fashion jewelry is mainly produced by artificially-craftedmaterials like acrylic,sterling silver,brass, rhinestones, etc., whichbrings the new waveof social and environmentally friendly customers Global market: Emergingeconomies  Emerging economies are expected to grow twoto three times faster than developed nations (Forbes, 2015)  High GPDper capita, retail sales increasing year by year, and continuous growth(CNBC, 2014)  Emerging economies include Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Indonesia, etc. (Forbes, 2015) THREATS Counterfeitproducts  Customers look forlow cost alternatives  The number of IPRseizures reached 23,140 in 2014 (CBP Public Affairs, 2015)  Counterfeits not only deprive revenues forthe company but also dilute its brand image (Marketline, 2015)
  • 8. ENVIRONMENTALSCAN 6 IncreasingLabour Wages  The labor cost for companies is rising o Tight labour markets, increased overtime,government mandated increases in minimum wages, and a higher proportion of full-time employees are increasing labour costs (Marketline, 2015)  Higher cost of living is increasing the rates of wages across the country o Wage rate in the US, whichremained at $5.15 per hour since 1998, increased to $5.85 per hour in 2008, increased to $6.55 per hour in 2009, and to $7.25 per hour in 2010 (Marketline,2015) o See Appendix B for the minimum wage increases in the past year in different states  Increasing wages can reduce the profit margin Dangerous Chemicals  Research from the Ecology Center found the lead, cadmium, chromium, and mercury levels are higher than recommended, in a sample fromthree retailer’s fashion jewelry (Daily Mail, 2012)  Fast spread of communicationcan stop customers from purchasing products, as they will link Stella and Dot’s jewelry with the chemical founds in the fashion jewelry
  • 9. TARGET MARKET 7 Stella & Dot’s primary market is middle-aged American Caucasian women.In order to further expand Stella & Dot’s well established direct sales model, wewill need to expand current reach and become more accessible to the normal consumer. GEOGRAPHIC Stella & Dot should focuson the US market, trying to capture the 20 main cities forretailing (Forbes, 2010), see Appendix A for listed cities. DEMOGRAPHIC The main demographic forjewelry and apparel is Caucasian women in the age range of 35 and 55 years. The individuals in this market have an average income of $78,000 and spend on average of $750 per yearbetween jewelry and apparel ( U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2012). PSYCHOGRAPHIC Out of the identified market, 32% prefer to shop via methods that are not online (PwC,2014). The reason forusing retail locations is the desire to receiveproductimmediately, avoid shipping costs, and the ability to physically handle the product beforepurchasing (PwC,2014). MARKET VALUES Stella & Dot’s core conceptof empowering and inspiring women should remain intact to be socially responsible. The solution must not negatively impact the current distribution method of direct sales through Stylists. MARKET SIZE Utilizing the total population of Caucasian womenbetween 35 and 55 years, whichis 40 million women, and taking away the online segment, leaves a potential market of 8.96 million (Census Bureau, 2010). In order to accomplish a revenueof $500 million by 2021, Stella & Dotwill need to acquire at least 6,700 women.
  • 10. COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 8 The competition Stella & Dot faces is both direct and indirect distribution channels within the jewelry and apparel market. DIRECTCOMPETITOR Directcompetitors are companies that are competing directly with Stella & Dot,and their current distribution model. Table 2: Stella & Dot’s Top 5 Direct Competitors Direct Competitor Chloe + Isabel Lia Sophia Silpada Designs Origami Owl Jewels by Park Lane Inc. Most Expensive Item(USD) $188 $118 $329 $54 $769 Least Expensive Item(USD) $18 $3 $3.50 $5 $4 MedianPrice (USD) $72 $89 $89 $22 $95 Revenue(USD) $0.36 million $121.9 million $164 million $250 million $179.9 million Market Share(%) 0.01% 4.3% 5.5% 8.3% 6% Distribution Strategy Online + Personal Merchandiser Online Outlet + Designer (Closing) Online + Personal Representative Online + Personal Designer Online + Personal Representative As seen in Table 2, weare establishing directcompetitors as the companies that sell fashion jewelry and base their distribution strategy in direct selling and online retail. Origami Owlhas the greatest share of the market, targeting their segment based on a lowerprice strategy and Jewelsby ParkLane has the highest prices.
  • 11. COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 9 INDIRECTCOMPETITOR Fine jewelry is more than half the market of purchased jewelry with 36.6 billion items (Golan, 2015). Fine jewelry is still an option forcustomers to consider while buying jewelry. Table 3: Stella & Dot’s Top 5 Indirect Competitors Tiffany Zales Kay BlueNile Helzberg Distribution Strategy Online + Retail Online + Retail Online + Retail Online Online + Retail Sales(USD) $1,805 million $1,888 million $4,209 million $488 million $692 million Main Product Rings Diamonds Rings Diamonds Diamonds Market Share 5.4% 5.6% 13% 1.4% 1.9% In Table 3, wecan see overallrevenue in fine jewelry is approximately 9 times greater than fashion jewelry.Kay earns the most revenue, in comparison toother competitors. STELLA & DOT Stella & Dot stands close to Origami Owlwith an 8.3% share with $250 million in revenue (as we assumed before) but presents a higher valueproduct. Stella & Dot’s Stylist have a better performanceper person, as 30,000 generate almost the same revenue as Origami Owl’s team of 50,000 designers (Forbes, 2014).
  • 12. ALTERNATIVES 10 Alternative1 – Indirect Distribution Alternative 1 is to completely re-haul Stella & Dot’s current distribution model fromdirect sales through Stylists towell-established brands and retailers such as Macy’s and Nordstrom. ADVANTAGES  Refocuson production of products  Reduce amount of interactions Stella & Dot needs to manage  Easier to manage whilescaling revenue growth DISADVANTAGES  Less controlof the representation of Stella & Dot’s products  Alienates the Stylists and current customer base  Completely revamping a business model is a highly risky strategy OVERVIEW For our target market, the ease of access to the products, and the more standardized approach to sales is potentially appealing. As stated earlier, 32% of women between the ages of 35-55 do not use the internet when making jewelry purchases (PwC,2014). By modifying our distribution method and utilizing multiple retail channels, Stella & Dot can expand its production and improve relations by reducing the number of interactions they deal with, to reach their sales goal of $500 million in annual sales.
  • 13. ALTERNATIVES 11 Alternative2 – Hybrid Distribution Alternative 2 is to combine Stella & Dot’s current distribution method withthe addition of major retail outlets such as Nordstrom and Macy’s.This allows the target customers, middle-aged Caucasian women, to choose whichevermethod of purchase is most convenientto them. ADVANTAGES  Adding more distributers, increases potential to capture the fullmarket  Potentialgrowth of revenue is very high  Providesa physical location forwomen to go, handle, and try on the product before committing to a purchase, without having to waitfor trunk shows DISADVANTAGES  Balancing channel conflictswhen dealing with multiple distributors is very difficult  Additional marketing channels are very expensive o Need to hire staff to manage and maintain the channels o Need to either provide or accommodate shipping in mass amounts to retail locations  Could potentially harm the income and negatively impact the women Stella & Dotare trying to empower and inspire OVERVIEW Using the current established direct sales distribution model Stella & Dot has, and the indirect distribution of major retail outlets, the company can capture their target market. Current research shows that 32% of womenwant an alternate method of purchasing products aside from the internet (PwC,2014). Currently, Stella & Dot only has 3.9% of their sales at fairs, exhibitions, and malls (DirectSellers Association, 2015). By using these additional channels of distribution, they can increase their revenue to reach their target of a $500 million increase in revenue within the next 5 years.
  • 14. ALTERNATIVES 12 Alternative3 – Direct Distribution Alternative 3 is forStella & Dot to open physical retail outlets using selectivedistribution and a full personal service. The specialized retail outlets can workside-by-side withthe Stylists. ADVANTAGES  67% of jewelry shoppers prefer buying in-store (PwC,2014)  Full controloverservice representation since it is operated by Stella & Dot  Omni-channel approach forbetter customer experience DISADVANTAGES  Increased operational expenses due to additional salaries and on-site software  Threat of reduced sales forthe Stylists  Additional distribution channels make inventory management more difficult OVERVIEW Stella & Dot can create retail outlets toallow more sales channels forthe customers without harming their Stylists. All distribution and sales will be handled directly by Stella & Dot, allowing complete controloverthe representation of the brand. This gives the most potential to capture the goal of 67,000 additional customers per year.
  • 15. SOLUTION 13 We recommend Stella & Dot to strategically expand its direct sales model, and open retail stores to capture the interest and appeal to middle-aged American women. Therefore,by adjusting its current distribution strategy, Stella & Dot willachieve $500 million in revenue by 2021. ARGUMENT  Specialty jewelry sales were $33.6 billion in 2014 (Golan, 2015) o 82% is done in-store (Golan, 2015) o 7% is done through online sales (Golan, 2015) o 10% is done through direct sellers (Ibis World, 2015)  48% of people research online before buying jewelry (PwC, 2014) o 67% will buy in-store compared to 26% online (PwC, 2014) The main reasons why people chose to buy in-store instead of online: Figure 1: People Who Purchased In-Store Rather Than Online (PWC, 2014) As seen in Figure 1, 73% people decided to buy in a physicalstore overonline. Among the top three reasons, avoid to pay for delivery and immediate access to the purchase, are reasons why consumers prefer to buy in a physicalstore rather than online (PwC,2014).
  • 16. SOLUTION 14 OBJECTIVES  The overallmarket value is based on the average jewelry sales of $750 annually per person (BLS Expenditure, 2011)  Utilize the new trend of “webrooming” o 73% of customers will research online before buyingin store (PwC,2014)  Physicalstores will help reach 22% of the 35 to 55 year-oldCaucasian women, whodo not buy jewelry online and prefer in-store shopping forno shipping fees and delivery time (Ibis World, 2015) o Stella & Dot willcapture 1% of their yearly spending in jewelry of $50 million, a market increase of 67,000 women yearly.Achievingthe goal of a 100% increase in revenue of $500 million by 2021 (Appendix C)  Having a physical store will lowerthe 30% return rate (averagefor the fashion industry) to 20%, by decreasing the poor fit returns (70% of totalreturns); therefore,decreasing costs (Neasle, 2013)  Physicalstores will havean objectivetorefer to a Stylist, for a fully customized experience and to avoidchannel conflict.Hence, it willalign with Stella & Dot’s “our mission and our passion for creating flexible entrepreneurship forwomen” (Herrin, 2014)
  • 17. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 15 1-2 YEAR 1. Use prime retail locations tomaximize potential customer traffic 2. Design and plan a good layoutforretail outlets that represent Stella & Dot’s brand’s goal of empowering and inspiring women 3. Organize the retail sales model to empowerthe Stylists, use a personalized one-on-one service, and preventa negative impact on their job 4. Prices willremain the same as the online store 5. Introduce a recommendation system, allowing customers that use retail outlets to recommend their Stylists 6. Stella & Dot products willworkby time-based competition 7. Physicalstores will create a better experience to casual shoppers and customers that prefer immediate products. Also, it will generate loyalty by recommending Stylists togive more value and personalized experiences to the clients 8. Open 20 pilot stores across large cities in the USA forretailing (Forbes, 2010):  Phoenix, AZ  Los Angeles, CA  San Diego, CA  San Francisco,CA  San Jose, CA  Denver,CO  Chicago, IL  Indianapolis, IN  Jacksonville,FL  Boston, MA  Charlotte, NC  New York,NY  Columbus, OH  Philadelphia, PA  Nashville, TN  Austin, TX  Houston, TX  San Antonio, TX  Dallas, TX  Seattle, WA Refer to Appendix A for cities’ data. Costs and revenue for1-2 year implementationplan: Total opening costs: $30,834 per location Extra monthly costs: $8,997 per location (additional cost forin-store strategy) Average monthly revenue first twoyears: $29,761 per store Total revenuefirst twoyears: $33,600,000 Refer to Appendix C for costs and sales breakdown.
  • 18. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 16 3-5 YEAR 1. Expand to additional retail outlets based off the success of pilot stores 2. Long-term goal to havemultiple retail locationswithin each state 3. Having nearby retail outlets will allow women to havea fully customizedexperience. The referral program allows Stylists to still recommend products to their friends and families and doesn’t impact the current model negatively 4. Open 140 stores across the main cities and malls Costs and revenue for3-5 year implementationplan: Total extra costs yearly (all stores): $1,259,580 (additional costfor in-store strategy) Total revenueyearly (all stores): $260,400,000 Total revenueyearly (Stylists): $412,500,000 (assuming a 13% growth(PrivCo,2015)) Total revenuein 2021: $672,900,000 Refer to Appendix C for costs and sales breakdown. BACKUP PLAN If Stella & Dot does not achieve100% growthin revenue by 2021, that is $500 million dollars, alternative 2: hybrid distribution willbe implemented, supporting our solution. We will reassess the selectivedistribution and go for a broader scope of distribution channels. Utilizing both direct and indirect distribution will allow Stella & Dot to reach the maximum amount of customers, thus developing a horizontal marketing system withNordstrom and J.C. Penny.
  • 19. COURSE CONCEPTS 17 Channel Conflict – Primary goal of our solution is to create an environment for the Stylists and retailer that does not create conflictbetweenthe distribution channels. Customer Value – Main focuswhile developing the case. DirectDistribution – Primary alternative and solution is a direct distribution method. Hybrid Distribution – Second alternative is hybridizing the direct and indirect distribution models. Indirect Distribution – First alternativeis indirect distribution. Levelof Service – Full service is our type of service in directdistribution. Marketing Mix – Followed the four Ps in the implementation of the solution. Secondary Research – Used throughout the case using library resources (PrivCo,Business Source Complete), retail surveys,and jewelry statistics. SelectiveDistribution – Retail outlets managed and distributed, our primary solution, is a formof selectivedistribution. SMART – Guideline toidentify the problem to solve. SWOTAnalysis – Environmentalscan of the internal strengths and weaknesses as well as the external threats and opportunities of Stella & Dot. Target Market – Identifying our target market by geographic, demographic, psychographic,and behavioral.
  • 20. REFERENCES 18 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012, September). ConsumerExpenditureSurvey.Retrievedfrom U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/cex/2011/Standard/age.pdf CBP Public Affairs. (2015, April 2). CBP, ICE HSI Report$1.2Billionin CounterfeitSeizures in 2014. Retrieved 11 18, 2015, from US Customs and Border Protection: http://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/2015-04-02-000000/cbp-ice- hsi-report-12-billion-counterfeit-seizures Census Bureau. (2010). Ageand SexComposition.RetrievedfromUnited States Census Bureau: http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf CNBC. (2014, June 20). 10 BestEmergingMarkets forRetail.Retrieved fromCNBC: http://www.cnbc.com/2014/06/20/retails-10-best-developing-markets.html?slide=11 Daily Mail. (2012, March 19). Pretty, shinyand a majorhealthrisk: Howscientists havefoundhigh levelsof dangerouschemicalsincostumejewellery.RetrievedfromDaily Mail UK: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2117157/Claires-Forever-21-H-M-costume- jewellery-contains-high-levels-dangerous-chemicals.html DirectSellers Association. (2015). IndustryStats. Retrievedfrom DSA: http://dsa.ca/the- industry/industry-stats/ eMarketer. (2015, August 20). Brick-and-MortarRemainsBestFitforApparelShoppers.Retrieved from eMarketer: http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1012886&ecid=MX1086 Ernst & Young.(2015, July 01). JessicaHerrin,Stella & Dot:Entrepreneurshiponherownterms. Retrieved 11 11, 2015, from EY:http://www.ey.com/GL/en/Services/Strategic-Growth- Markets/ey-exceptional-july-december-2015-2-jessica-herrin-stella-and-dot ESRI. (2015, January 01). WhereAre the BigSpenders onThings ThatBling?Retrieved 11 10, 2015, fromESRI: http://www.esri.com/data/esri_data/jewelry-map Forbes. (2010, December 13). America’s 25 BestCities ForShopping.RetrievedfromForbes: http://www.forbes.com/2010/12/13/best-cities-for-shopping-forbes-woman-time- retail-walmart-sales-tax_slide_1.html Forbes. (2014, October22). $250 MillionForA 14-Year-Old's BigIdea:OrigamiOwl.Retrieved from Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/sites/karstenstrauss/2014/10/22/250-million-for-a- 14-year-olds-big-idea-origami-owl/
  • 21. REFERENCES 19 Forbes. (2014, July 25). Retail.Retrieved fromForbes: http://www.forbes.com/sites/barbarathau/2014/07/25/report-amazons-got-nothing- on-brick-and-mortar-stores/ Forbes. (2015). WhyInvestin EmergingMarkets? RetrievedfromForbes. Gaille, B. (2013, October26). 14 Jewelry IndustryStatistics andTrends.Retrieved11 10, 2015, from Brandon Gaille Marketing Expert & Blogmaster: http://brandongaille.com/14- jewelry-industry-statistics-and-trends/ Golan, E. (2015, March). The2014US JewelryState of theMarket Report.Retrievedfrom Edahn Golan: http://edahngolan.com/Docs/Edahn_Golan- 2015_US_State_of_the_Jewelry_Market.pdf Herrin, J. (2014, December 11). Stella & Dot's Business Booms, But Will It Go Public?(Bloomerg, Interviewer) Ibis World. (2015, February). DirectSelling of Jewelry& Accessories intheUS: MarketResearch Report.Retrievedfrom Ibis World: http://www.ibisworld.com/industry/direct-selling-of- jewelry-accessories.html International Euromonitor.(2014, November25). Stateof the PersonalAccessories Marketin 2015.Retrieved 11 11, 2015, fromLinkedIn: http://www.slideshare.net/Euromonitor/personal-accessories-2015 Los Angeles Times. (2014, February 09). Stella &Dot FounderSawaWay to Dress Up DirectSales. Retrieved 11 12, 2015, from LA TImes: http://articles.latimes.com/2014/feb/09/business/la-fi-himi-jessica-herrin-20140209 Marketline. (2015). Avon ProductsInc. SWOT Analysis. Marketline. Miller, R. K. (2006). JEWELRY.InR. K. Miller, ApparelMarketResearchHandbook(pp.70-73). Morrison, K. (2014, November 28). 81%of Shoppers ConductOnlineResearchBeforeBuying. Retrieved fromSocial Times: http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/81-shoppers- conduct-online-research-making-purchase-infographic/208527 Neasle, E. (2013, May).TheSearch for Simplicity. Retrievedfrom SIASTO: https://blog.siasto.com/the-search-for-simplicity-iii New EraConsulting. (2015). Directv. Manufacturers’Representative:HowBestto OrganizeaSales Team.Retrieved 11 18, 2015, from New EraConsulting: http://www.neweraconsulting.com/direct-v-mfg.htm
  • 22. REFERENCES 20 NPD.(2014, March 27). NPD ReportsOnlineSales of Women’s Accessories Increased7PercentIn OtherwiseFlat Market.Retrieved 11 09, 2015, fromNPD: https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/press-releases/npd-reports-online- sales-of-womens-accessories-increased-7-percent-in-otherwise-flat-market/ Polygon.(2014,March). RetailJewelryIndustryin the U.S. 2014.Retrieved from Polygon: http://www.polygon.net/jwl/public/documents/resource-center/industry- reports/Retail%20Jewelry%20Industry%20in%20America_Report%202014-PDF- final.pdf PrivCo.(2014). M&ADealReport. PrivCo. PrivCo.(2015). Stella& DotLLC.Retrieved from PrivCo:http://0- www.privco.com.innopac.lib.bcit.ca/private-company/stella-and-dot PwC.(2014, October).TotalRetailV SurveyUnited States (US).Retrieved fromPWC: http://www.pwc.com/us/en/retail-consumer/publications/assets/total-retail-2014- us.pdf Source Intelligence. (2014). What AreConflict Minerals.Retrieved fromSource Intelligence: http://www.sourceintelligence.com/what-are-conflict-minerals/ Stella & Dot. (2015, January 01). AboutUs. Retrieved 11 16, 2015, from Stella & Dot: http://www.stelladot.com/about Stella & Dot. (2015). BirthstoneCharms.Retrieved11 18, 2015, fromStella & Dot: http://www.stelladot.com/shop/en_ca/p/birthstone-charm-sterling-silver Stella & Dot. (2015, January 01). TrunkShowFaqs.Retrieved 11 14, 2015, from Stella & Dot: http://www.stelladot.com/trunkshow/faqs Stella & Dot. (2015). US Shipping& Delivery.Retrieved fromStella & Dot: http://www.stelladot.com/help/shipping-rates-us Wilson, D. (2015). Stella & DotCase Study. Stellaand DotDistributionCase .Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: BCIT. Womens Wear Daily.(2011). Stella& DotExpandOffer. Retrieved fromWWD: http://wwd.com/accessories-news/fashion-scoops/stella-dot-expands-into-family-of- brands-7811877/
  • 23. APPENDIX 21 APPENDIX A Table 4: Top 20 Cities for Retailing (Forbes, 2010) APPENDIX B The minimum wage increases in the past year in different states:  Arizona $7.9 in 2014 to $8.05 in 2015 (Marketline, 2015)  Florida $7.93 in 2014 to$8.05 in 2015 (Marketline, 2015)  Colorado $8 in 2014 to $8.23 in 2015 (Marketline, 2015)  Alaska $7.75 in 2014 to $8.75 in 2015 (Marketline, 2015)  Washington $9.32 in 2014 to $9.47 in 2015 (Marketline, 2015)  Oregon $9.1 in 2014 to $9.25 in 2015 (Marketline, 2015) Cities Retail Locations Shopping Centers Sales Tax Women Population Phoenix, AZ 11,992.00 40 9.30% 765,455 Los Angelex, CA 40,170.00 15 9.75% 1,972,290 San Diego, CA 9,948.00 22 8.75% 683,595 San Francisco, CA 14,412.00 9 9.50% 504,845 San Jose, CA 5,421.00 13 9.25% 504,845 Denver, CO 8,476.00 11 7.72% 420,263 Chicago, IL 30,234.00 22 9.75% 331,500 Indianapolis, IN 5,955.00 18 7.00% 438,778 Jacksonville, FL 5,190.00 25 7.00% 439,492 Boston, MA 17,098.00 7 6.25% 341,716 Charlotte, NC 6,225.00 21 8.25% 418,748 New York, NY 75,619.00 9 8.88% 4,332,072 Columbus, OH 5,712.00 32 7.75% 428,010 Philadelphia, PA 20,970.00 29 8.00% 823,786 Nashville, TN 5,955.00 18 7.00% 331,676 Austin, TX 5,347.00 31 8.25% 450,903 Houston, TX 16,938.00 54 8.25% 1,115,271 Dallas, TX 19,069.00 28 8.25% 640,500 San Antonio, TX 5,913.00 41 8.13% 735,589 Seattle, WA 11,549.00 9 8.80% 334,171
  • 24. APPENDIX 22 APPENDIX C 35-55 Us Women White women In Store buyers Average spending Total spending Needed Goal Revenue Summary Description 40,000,000.00 70% 32% $250,000,000 $286,111.11 Per Store 40,000,000.00 28,000,000.00 8,960,000.00 $750 $6,720,000,000 1% $50,000,000 $35,000.00 Per month 22% 66,666.67 People Sales associates Sales Salary Total Associates Regional Manager Average Rent Utilities Other expenses Total 2 $1,760 $3,520 $2,500 $1,877 $300 $800 $8,997 Spread cost 1 year Expense $359,880 5 year Expense $1,619,460 Rent and Operation Arrengements Miscellaneous IT Marketing Public Relations Total Costs $4,899 $7,650 $1,560 $6,165 $8,900 $1,670 $30,844 # Stores 2 year 40 $1,400,000.00 $16,800,000.00 $33,600,000.00 # Stores 5 year 180 $6,300,000.00 $75,600,000.00 $226,800,000.00 $260,400,000.00 Revenue 2021 Stylists 250000000 412500000 $672,900,000.00 OPERATING COSTS SALES OPENING COSTS Table 5: Sales, Operating Costs, and Opening Costs