All the data, statistics, and trends you need to make sense of digital in Romania in 2022. Includes the latest reported numbers for internet users, social media users, and mobile connections in Romania, as well as key indicators of ecommerce use. For more reports, including the latest global trends and individual data for more than 230 countries around the world, visit https://datareportal.com/
5. !
The findings published in this report use the latest data available at the time of production. This may include revised figures
for historical data points that were not available when we published previous reports in the Global Digital Reports series.
From time to time, we may also change the data sources that we use to inform specific data points, and we may also change
how we calculate certain values. Similarly, our data partners may change the ways in which they source, calculate, or report
the data that they share with us. As a result, findings published in this report may not correlate with findings published
in our previous reports, especially where such findings represent change over time (e.g. annual growth). Where we report
figures for change over time, such figures will use the latest available data, so we recommend using the values published
in this report, rather than trying to recalculate such values using data from previous reports. Wherever we’re aware of the
potential for historical mismatches, we’ve included a note on comparability in the footnotes of each relevant slide. Please
read these advisories carefully to understand how data sources or calculations have changed since previous reports, and
beware of making any comparisons with historical data. In addition to changes in data sources and calculations, please
note that social media user numbers may not represent unique individuals. This is because some people may manage
multiple social media accounts, and because some social media accounts may represent ‘non-human’ entities (e.g. businesses,
animals, bands, etc.). As a result, the figures we publish for social media users may exceed the figures we publish for total
population or for internet users. This may seem counter-intuitive, but such differences do not represent mistakes. For more
information, please read our notes on data variance, mismatches, and curiosities: https://datareportal.com/notes-on-data.
IMPORTANT NOTES ON COMPARING DATA
7. 7
7.91 8.28 4.95 4.62
BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION
+1.0% +2.9% +4.0% +10.1%
57.0% 104.6% 62.5% 58.4%
TOTAL
POPULATION
MOBILE
CONNECTIONS
INTERNET
USERS
ACTIVE SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
URBANISATION TOTAL vs. POPULATION TOTAL vs. POPULATION TOTAL vs. POPULATION
SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; GOVERNMENT BODIES; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; ITU; GWI; EUROSTAT; CNNIC; APJII; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND
EARNINGS REPORTS; OCDH; TECHRASA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
OVERVIEW OF THE ADOPTION AND USE OF CONNECTED DEVICES AND SERVICES AT A WORLDWIDE LEVEL
GLOBAL DIGITAL HEADLINES
FEB
2022
13. ESSENTIAL DATA FOR DIGITAL ADOPTION AND USE IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD
DIGITAL 2022
LOCAL COUNTRY HEADLINES REPORT
THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO THE WORLD’S CONNECTED BEHAVIOURS
GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT
DIGITAL 2022
CLICK HERE TO READ OUR DIGITAL 2022
LOCAL COUNTRY HEADLINES REPORT, WITH
ESSENTIAL STATS FOR DIGITAL ADOPTION
IN EVERY COUNTRY AROUND THE WORLD
CLICK HERE TO READ OUR FLAGSHIP DIGITAL
2022 GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT, PACKED
WITH ALL THE NUMBERS YOU NEED TO MAKE
SENSE OF THE CURRENT STATE OF DIGITAL
EXPLORE OUR COMPLETE COLLECTION OF DIGITAL 2022 GLOBAL DATA
16. 16
19.08 27.41 16.79 13.30
MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
54.6% 143.7% 88.0% 69.7%
URBANISATION vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION
TOTAL
POPULATION
CELLULAR MOBILE
CONNECTIONS
INTERNET
USERS
ACTIVE SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS
SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; GOVERNMENT BODIES; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; ITU; GWI; EUROSTAT; CNNIC; APJII; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND
EARNINGS REPORTS; OCDH; TECHRASA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES.
ROMANIA
OVERVIEW OF THE ADOPTION AND USE OF CONNECTED DEVICES AND SERVICES
ESSENTIAL DIGITAL HEADLINES
FEB
2022
17. 17
-0.5% +3.9% +3.0% +10.8%
-103 THOUSAND +1.0 MILLION +485 THOUSAND +1.3 MILLION
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
TOTAL
POPULATION
CELLULAR MOBILE
CONNECTIONS
INTERNET
USERS
ACTIVE SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS
SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; GOVERNMENT BODIES; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; ITU; GWI; EUROSTAT; CNNIC; APJII; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND
EARNINGS REPORTS; OCDH; TECHRASA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: DUE TO COVID-19-RELATED DELAYS IN RESEARCH AND REPORTING, FIGURES FOR INTERNET USER GROWTH MAY UNDER-REPRESENT
ACTUAL TRENDS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR MORE DETAILS. SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES.
ROMANIA
CHANGE IN THE USE OF CONNECTED DEVICES AND SERVICES OVER TIME
DIGITAL GROWTH
FEB
2022
18. 18
54.6% 82.9 98.8% 98.6% 99.1%
19.08 51.4% 48.6% -0.5% 43.8
MILLION -103 THOUSAND
URBAN
POPULATION
POPULATION DENSITY
(PEOPLE PER KM2
)
OVERALL LITERACY
(ADULTS AGED 15+)
FEMALE LITERACY
(ADULTS AGED 15+)
MALE LITERACY
(ADULTS AGED 15+)
TOTAL
POPULATION
FEMALE
POPULATION
MALE
POPULATION
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN TOTAL POPULATION
MEDIAN AGE OF
THE POPULATION
SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; WORLD BANK; UNESCO; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; OUR WORLD IN DATA; INDEXMUNDI; KNOEMA.
ROMANIA
DEMOGRAPHICS AND OTHER KEY INDICATORS
POPULATION ESSENTIALS
FEB
2022
19. 19
20.3 M 20.2 M 20.1 M 20.0 M 19.9 M 19.7 M 19.6 M 19.4 M 19.3 M 19.2 M 19.1 M
-0.5% -0.5% -0.5% -0.6% -0.7% -0.7% -0.7% -0.7% -0.6% -0.5%
JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES ABOVE BARS, “K” DENOTES THOUSANDS
(E.G. “123 K” = 123,000), “M” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 M” = 1,230,000), AND “B” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS.
COMPARABILITY: SOURCE CHANGES AND BASE REVISIONS. FIGURES MAY NOT CORRELATE WITH VALUES PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
TOTAL POPULATION AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
POPULATION OVER TIME
FEB
2022
DATAREPORTAL
20. 20
12.1% 13.8% 16.0% 12.1% 20.1%
19.08 4.9% 8.1% 5.6% 7.3%
MILLION
65+
55-64
45-54
35-44
25-34
18-24
13-17
5-12
0-4
POPULATION
AGED 25-34
POPULATION
AGED 35-44
POPULATION
AGED 45-54
POPULATION
AGED 55-64
POPULATION
AGED 65+
TOTAL
POPULATION
POPULATION
AGED 0-4
POPULATION
AGED 5-12
POPULATION
AGED 13-17
POPULATION
AGED 18-24
SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES.
ROMANIA
SHARE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION BY AGE GROUP
POPULATION BY AGE
FEB
2022
21. 21
17.1% 31.0% 12.3% 10.5% 2.2%
-9.5% (-180 BPS) +29.7% (+710 BPS) +26.8% (+260 BPS) +34.6% (+270 BPS) -21.4% (-60 BPS)
97.8% 96.9% 9.0% 81.6% 43.6%
+0.6% (+60 BPS) -0.1% (-10 BPS) [UNCHANGED] -5.1% (-440 BPS) +0.9% (+40 BPS)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
GAMES
CONSOLE
SMART WATCH OR
SMART WRISTBAND
TV STREAMING
DEVICE
SMART HOME
DEVICE
VIRTUAL REALITY
DEVICE
ANY KIND OF
MOBILE PHONE
SMART
PHONE
FEATURE
PHONE
LAPTOP OR
DESKTOP COMPUTER
TABLET
DEVICE
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
NOTE: PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REFLECT RELATIVE CHANGE. “BPS” VALUES SHOW THE CHANGE IN BASIS POINTS, AND REFLECT ABSOLUTE CHANGE.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO OWN EACH KIND OF DEVICE
DEVICE OWNERSHIP
FEB
2022
22. 22
1H 11M 1H 29M 0H 42M 0H 38M
+1.4% (+1 MIN) +7.2% (+6 MINS) +40.0% (+12 MINS) +15.2% (+5 MINS)
7H 09M 3H 34M 2H 19M 1H 24M
-3.8% (-17 MINS) +7.5% (+15 MINS) +2.2% (+3 MINS) +2.4% (+2 MINS)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
TIME SPENT LISTENING TO
MUSIC STREAMING SERVICES
TIME SPENT LISTENING
TO BROADCAST RADIO
TIME SPENT LISTENING
TO PODCASTS
TIME SPENT USING
A GAMES CONSOLE
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
TIME SPENT USING
THE INTERNET
TIME SPENT WATCHING TELEVISION
(BROADCAST AND STREAMING)
TIME SPENT USING
SOCIAL MEDIA
TIME SPENT READING PRESS MEDIA
(ONLINE AND PHYSICAL PRINT)
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS. NOTES: CONSUMPTION OF DIFFERENT MEDIA
MAY OCCUR CONCURRENTLY. TELEVISION INCLUDES BOTH LINEAR (BROADCAST AND CABLE) TELEVISION AND CONTENT DELIVERED VIA STREAMING AND VIDEO-ON-DEMAND SERVICES. PRESS INCLUDES
BOTH ONLINE AND PHYSICAL PRINT MEDIA. BROADCAST RADIO DOES NOT INCLUDE INTERNET RADIO.
ROMANIA
THE AVERAGE AMOUNT OF TIME EACH DAY THAT INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 SPEND WITH DIFFERENT KINDS OF MEDIA AND DEVICES
DAILY TIME SPENT WITH MEDIA
FEB
2022
24. 24
16.79 88.0% +3.0% 7H 09M 93.6%
MILLION +485 THOUSAND -3.8% (-17 MINS)
TOTAL
INTERNET
USERS
INTERNET USERS AS
A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL POPULATION
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN THE NUMBER OF
INTERNET USERS
AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT
USING THE INTERNET BY
EACH INTERNET USER
PERCENTAGE OF USERS
ACCESSING THE INTERNET
VIA MOBILE PHONES
SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; ITU; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; EUROSTAT; GWI; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; CNNIC; APJII; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; UNITED NATIONS. TIME SPENT AND MOBILE SHARE DATA
FROM GWI (Q3 2021), BASED ON A BROAD SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: “YOY” FIGURES SHOW YEAR-ON-YEAR GROWTH. FOR CHANGE IN TIME,
“H” DENOTES HOURS AND “M” DENOTES MINUTES. ADVISORY: DUE TO COVID-19-RELATED DELAYS IN RESEARCH AND REPORTING, FIGURES FOR INTERNET USER GROWTH MAY UNDER-REPRESENT ACTUAL
TRENDS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR MORE DETAILS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES.
ROMANIA
ESSENTIAL INDICATORS OF INTERNET ADOPTION AND USE
OVERVIEW OF INTERNET USE
FEB
2022
25. 25
8.92 M
10.1 M
11.0 M
11.8 M
12.3 M
14.9 M 15.0 M 15.1 M 15.4 M
16.3 M
16.8 M
+13.1% +9.5% +6.7% +4.5% +21.0% +0.5% +0.6% +2.5% +5.6% +3.0%
JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; ITU; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; EUROSTAT; GWI; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; CNNIC; APJII; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES
ABOVE BARS, “K” DENOTES THOUSANDS (E.G. “123 K” = 123,000), “M” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 M” = 1,230,000), AND “B” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS
PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS. ADVISORY: DUE TO COVID-19-RELATED DELAYS IN RESEARCH AND REPORTING, FIGURES FOR INTERNET USER GROWTH AFTER 2020 MAY UNDER-REPRESENT ACTUAL
TRENDS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR MORE DETAILS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. FIGURES MAY NOT MATCH OR CORRELATE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
INTERNET USERS OVER TIME
NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
FEB
2022
DATAREPORTAL
26. 26
14.98 14.97 14.39
MILLION MILLION MILLION
78.5% 78.5% 75.4%
vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION
INTERNET USERS:
ITU
INTERNET USERS:
CIA WORLD FACTBOOK
INTERNET USERS:
INTERNETWORLDSTATS
SOURCES: AS STATED ABOVE EACH ICON. NOTES: WHERE SOURCES PUBLISH INTERNET ADOPTION AS A PERCENTAGE (I.E. PENETRATION), WE COMPARE THE LATEST PUBLISHED ADOPTION RATES IN EACH
COUNTRY TO OUR LATEST FIGURES FOR POPULATION TO DERIVE ABSOLUTE USER NUMBERS. WHERE SOURCES PUBLISH ABSOLUTE USER NUMBERS, WE COMPARE THESE ABSOLUTE USER FIGURES TO OUR LATEST
FIGURES FOR POPULATION TO DERIVE VALUES FOR “vs. POPULATION”. COMPARABILITY: POTENTIAL MISMATCHES. INTERNET USER FIGURES QUOTED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT USE DATA FROM MULTIPLE
SOURCES, INCLUDING SOURCES NOT FEATURED ON THIS SLIDE.
ROMANIA
INTERNET USER NUMBERS PUBLISHED BY DIFFERENT SOURCES
INTERNET USER PERSPECTIVES
FEB
2022
27. 27
7H 09M 3H 41M 3H 28M 51.6%
DAILY TIME SPENT USING THE
INTERNET ACROSS ALL DEVICES
TIME SPENT USING THE
INTERNET ON MOBILE PHONES
TIME SPENT USING THE INTERNET
ON COMPUTERS AND TABLETS
MOBILE’S SHARE OF TOTAL
DAILY INTERNET TIME
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
AMOUNT OF TIME THAT INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 SPEND USING THE INTERNET EACH DAY
DAILY TIME SPENT USING THE INTERNET
FEB
2022
28. 28
82.4%
71.5%
68.0%
63.3%
62.7%
60.3%
56.7%
55.2%
52.5%
46.0%
42.7%
37.1%
32.9%
29.0%
27.3%
FINDING INFORMATION
STAYING IN TOUCH WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY
RESEARCHING HOW TO DO THINGS
RESEARCHING BRANDS
FOLLOWING NEWS AND CURRENT EVENTS
FINDING NEW IDEAS AND INSPIRATION
LISTENING TO MUSIC
WATCHING VIDEOS, TV SHOWS, AND MOVIES
RESEARCHING PLACES AND TRAVEL
RESEARCHING HEALTH ISSUES AND PRODUCTS
EDUCATION AND STUDY
GAMING
FILLING UP SPARE TIME
MEETING NEW PEOPLE
MANAGING FINANCES
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PRIMARY REASONS WHY INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 USE THE INTERNET
MAIN REASONS FOR USING THE INTERNET
FEB
2022
29. 29
77.8% 22.5% 43.5% 5.0% 8.6%
-4.5% (-370 BPS) -1.7% (-40 BPS) +3.1% (+130 BPS) [NEW DATA POINT] +13.2% (+100 BPS)
93.6% 80.6% 92.2% 3.2% 33.1%
+0.4% (+40 BPS) -5.1% (-430 BPS) +1.3% (+120 BPS) -3.0% (-10 BPS) +1.5% (+50 BPS)
MOBILE
PHONE (ANY)
LAPTOP OR
DESKTOP (ANY)
SMART
PHONE
FEATURE
PHONE
TABLET
DEVICE
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
PERSONAL LAPTOP
OR DESKTOP
WORK LAPTOP
OR DESKTOP
CONNECTED
TELEVISION
SMART HOME
DEVICE
GAMES
CONSOLE
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS. NOTES: “MOBILE PHONE (ANY)” INCLUDES
USERS WHO ACCESS VIA A SMARTPHONE OR A FEATURE PHONE. “LAPTOP OR DESKTOP (ANY)” INCLUDES USERS WHO ACCESS VIA THEIR OWN COMPUTER OR A COMPUTER PROVIDED BY THEIR EMPLOYER.
PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REFLECT RELATIVE CHANGE. “BPS” VALUES SHOW THE CHANGE IN BASIS POINTS, AND REFLECT ABSOLUTE CHANGE.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO USE EACH KIND OF DEVICE TO ACCESS THE INTERNET
DEVICES USED TO ACCESS THE INTERNET
FEB
2022
30. 30
33.76 +32.4% 124.36 +37.4%
MBPS +8.27 MBPS MBPS +33.87 MBPS
MEDIAN DOWNLOAD SPEED
OF CELLULAR MOBILE
INTERNET CONNECTIONS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN MEDIAN CELLULAR MOBILE
INTERNET CONNECTION SPEED
MEDIAN DOWNLOAD
SPEED OF FIXED
INTERNET CONNECTIONS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN MEDIAN FIXED INTERNET
CONNECTION SPEED
SOURCE: OOKLA. NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT MEDIAN DOWNLOAD SPEEDS IN MEGABITS PER SECOND (MBPS) IN NOVEMBER 2021. COMPARABILITY: THE VALUES FOR INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS THAT
WE FEATURED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS REFLECTED MEAN CONNECTION SPEEDS, WHEREAS WE NOW FEATURE MEDIAN CONNECTION SPEEDS, WHICH OFFER A MORE REPRESENTATIVE INDICATION OF THE
CONNECTION SPEEDS THAT “TYPICAL” USERS CAN EXPECT. AS A RESULT, VALUES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH THE VALUES PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
MEDIAN DOWNLOAD SPEEDS (IN MEGABITS PER SECOND) OF MOBILE AND FIXED INTERNET CONNECTIONS
INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS
FEB
2022
31. 31
56.40% 42.53% 1.06% 0.01%
+3.7% (+201 BPS) -3.9% (-174 BPS) -19.1% (-25 BPS) -50.0% (-1 BP)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
MOBILE
PHONES
LAPTOP AND
DESKTOP COMPUTERS
TABLET
DEVICES
OTHER
DEVICES
SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF WEB PAGES SERVED TO BROWSERS RUNNING ON EACH TYPE OF DEVICE COMPARED WITH THE TOTAL NUMBER OF WEB PAGES SERVED
TO BROWSERS RUNNING ON ANY DEVICE IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%,
NOT 70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS RUNNING ON EACH KIND OF DEVICE
SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICE
FEB
2022
32. 32
4.05% 3.03% 0.06% 0.67%
-25.8% (-141 BPS) +12.6% (+34 BPS) [UNCHANGED] -53.5% (-77 BPS)
73.93% 11.94% 2.51% 3.81%
+1.7% (+122 BPS) +8.2% (+90 BPS) +20.7% (+43 BPS) -15.7% (-71 BPS)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
SAMSUNG INTERNET OPERA UC BROWSER OTHER
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
CHROME SAFARI MICROSOFT EDGE FIREFOX
SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS SERVED TO EACH BROWSER AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PAGE VIEWS SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS RUNNING ON ANY KIND
OF DEVICE IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%).
“BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB PAGES SERVED TO EACH BRAND OF WEB BROWSER RUNNING ON ANY DEVICE
SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY BROWSER
FEB
2022
33. 33
11 DIGISPORT.RO 16.8M 2.10M 7M 58S 2.63
12 YAHOO.COM 15.2M 2.49M 14M 07S 3.96
13 STIRIPESURSE.RO 12.5M 1.86M 12M 10S 2.60
14 STIRILEPROTV.RO 12.0M 2.85M 5M 19S 2.20
15 ADEVARUL.RO 11.9M 3.00M 6M 44S 2.27
16 CANCAN.RO 11.2M 2.42M 7M 19S 1.90
17 ANTENA3.RO 11.2M 2.80M 5M 40S 2.18
18 CAPITAL.RO 11.0M 1.72M 10M 50S 1.72
19 LIBERTATEA.RO 10.6M 2.91M 9M 29S 1.56
20 PORNHUB.COM 10.6M 1.80M 12M 36S 7.31
01 GOOGLE.COM 102M 8.04M 18M 18S 4.99
02 BIT.LY 64.6M 12.1M 15M 51S 1.36
03 FACEBOOK.COM 48.4M 6.90M 21M 41S 5.90
04 YOUTUBE.COM 31.4M 4.24M 6M 01S 3.61
05 EMAG.RO 23.4M 5.86M 11M 25S 5.43
06 GOOGLE.RO 23.3M 2.84M 15M 54S 5.88
07 VODAFONE.COM 20.3M 4.10M 10M 26S 1.94
08 DIGI24.RO 20.2M 4.37M 6M 04S 2.19
09 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 20.2M 5.48M 10M 41S 1.91
10 OLX.RO 17.8M 4.31M 13M 51S 5.45
# WEBSITE
TOTAL
VISITS
UNIQUE
VISITORS
TIME PER
VISIT
PAGES
PER VISIT
# WEBSITE
TOTAL
VISITS
UNIQUE
VISITORS
TIME PER
VISIT
PAGES
PER VISIT
SOURCE: SEMRUSH. FIGURES REPRESENT TRAFFIC VALUES FOR NOVEMBER 2021. NOTE: “UNIQUE VISITORS” REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF DISTINCT ‘IDENTITIES’ ACCESSING EACH SITE, BUT MAY NOT
REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AS SOME PEOPLE MAY USE MULTIPLE DEVICES OR BROWSERS. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE
CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE METHODOLOGY CHANGES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
MOST-VISITED WEBSITES: SEMRUSH RANKING
RANKING OF THE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES ACCORDING TO SEMRUSH, BASED ON TOTAL MONTHLY WEBSITE TRAFFIC IN NOVEMBER 2021
FEB
2022
34. 34
01 GOOGLE.COM 71.1% 28.9% 4.34% 1.08% 1.07% 0.05% 0.14% 0.05% 0.93% <0.01%
02 BIT.LY 100.0% 0.1% 26.41% 0.16% 0.03% 0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% –
03 FACEBOOK.COM 85.0% 15.0% <0.01% 0.16% 0.18% 0.03% 0.02% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01%
04 YOUTUBE.COM 28.7% 71.3% 1.99% 0.17% 0.19% 0.05% <0.01% <0.01% 0.05% <0.01%
05 EMAG.RO 69.6% 30.4% 0.31% 0.03% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01%
06 GOOGLE.RO 64.5% 35.5% 1.39% 0.14% 0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% 0.03% <0.01%
07 VODAFONE.COM 99.6% 0.4% 0.42% 0.06% 0.03% <0.01% 0.01% <0.01% <0.01% –
08 DIGI24.RO 90.5% 9.5% 0.66% <0.01% 0.01% 0.02% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01%
09 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 80.7% 19.3% 0.12% 0.01% 0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% 0.01% –
10 OLX.RO 79.1% 20.9% 0.38% 0.02% 0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% –
# WEBSITE
SHARE OF
TRAFFIC FROM
MOBILES
SHARE OF
TRAFFIC FROM
COMPUTERS
TRAFFIC FROM
FACEBOOK
REFERRALS
TRAFFIC FROM
YOUTUBE
REFERRALS
TRAFFIC FROM
INSTAGRAM
REFERRALS
TRAFFIC FROM
TWITTER
REFERRALS
TRAFFIC FROM
LINKEDIN
REFERRALS
TRAFFIC FROM
PINTEREST
REFERRALS
TRAFFIC FROM
REDDIT
REFERRALS
TRAFFIC
FROM VK
REFERRALS
SOURCE: SEMRUSH. FIGURES REPRESENT TRAFFIC VALUES FOR NOVEMBER 2021. NOTE: TRAFFIC FROM SOCIAL MEDIA REFERRALS REPRESENT THE SHARE OF TOTAL WEBSITE VISITS THAT ORIGINATED FROM A
CLICK OR A TAP ON A LINK PUBLISHED ON THE RESPECTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN
VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE METHODOLOGY CHANGES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
SHARE OF WEBSITE TRAFFIC BY DEVICE, AND SHARE OF WEBSITE TRAFFIC REFERRED BY A SELECTION OF SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS IN NOVEMBER 2021
TOP WEBSITE TRAFFIC DETAIL (SEMRUSH)
FEB
2022
35. 35
11 DIGI24.RO 225M 72.2% 27.8% 2M 45S 2.54
12 INSTAGRAM.COM 214M 49.8% 50.2% 9M 04S 12.20
13 XVIDEOS.COM 155M 87.5% 12.5% 13M 42S 10.55
14 DIGISPORT.RO 151M 74.8% 25.2% 4M 35S 2.77
15 WHATSAPP.COM 146M 13.7% 86.3% 2M 55S 1.49
16 PORNHUB.COM 144M 82.2% 17.8% 8M 26S 6.61
17 FILMESERIALEONLINE.ORG 139M 13.2% 86.8% 5M 48S 3.96
18 ADEVARUL.RO 138M 73.1% 26.9% 3M 16S 2.55
19 NETFLIX.COM 131M 8.7% 91.3% 7M 23S 4.17
20 GSP.RO 121M 72.1% 27.9% 4M 54S 2.90
01 GOOGLE.COM 4.14B 55.7% 44.3% 10M 53S 8.33
02 YOUTUBE.COM 1.95B 19.2% 80.8% 22M 55S 13.49
03 FACEBOOK.COM 1.53B 49.9% 50.1% 11M 04S 9.79
04 GOOGLE.RO 477M 38.5% 61.5% 8M 03S 12.09
05 YAHOO.COM 407M 20.4% 79.6% 7M 58S 6.11
06 EMAG.RO 357M 56.9% 43.1% 7M 06S 8.39
07 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 267M 59.4% 40.6% 3M 54S 3.20
08 VODAFONE.COM 253M 99.1% 0.9% 1M 09S 1.80
09 OLX.RO 245M 56.6% 43.4% 8M 40S 9.43
10 XNXX.COM 242M 93.3% 6.7% 13M 49S 11.74
# WEBSITE
TOTAL
VISITS
MOBILE
SHARE
DESKTOP
SHARE
TIME
PER VISIT
PAGES
PER VISIT
# WEBSITE
TOTAL
VISITS
MOBILE
SHARE
DESKTOP
SHARE
TIME
PER VISIT
PAGES
PER VISIT
SOURCE: SIMILARWEB. FIGURES REPRESENT TRAFFIC VALUES BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE
CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS.
ROMANIA
MOST-VISITED WEBSITES: SIMILARWEB RANKING
RANKING OF THE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES ACCORDING TO SIMILARWEB, BASED ON ANNUAL WEBSITE TRAFFIC FOR FULL-YEAR 2021
FEB
2022
36. 36
11 FLASHSCORE.RO 06M 17S 4.90
12 FILMESERIALEONLINE.ORG 04M 53S 6.20
13 FILELIST.IO 03M 25S 2.80
14 BOOKING.COM 07M 21S 5.24
15 XHAMSTER.COM 12M 33S 10.10
16 VK.COM 07M 03S 3.58
17 ZOOM.US 06M 27S 3.52
18 BTRL.RO 02M 31S 1.50
19 CHATURBATE.COM 11M 14S 8.24
20 AUTOVIT.RO 04M 31S 4.20
01 GOOGLE.COM 17M 26S 18.49
02 YOUTUBE.COM 19M 22S 10.53
03 GOOGLE.RO 03M 03S 3.50
04 YAHOO.COM 05M 16S 4.88
05 EMAG.RO 05M 10S 5.30
06 OLX.RO 08M 21S 6.40
07 BONGACAMS.COM 03M 20S 1.80
08 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 03M 39S 3.05
09 NETFLIX.COM 04M 46S 3.61
10 FACEBOOK.COM 17M 46S 8.56
# WEBSITE TIME PER DAY PAGES PER DAY # WEBSITE TIME PER DAY PAGES PER DAY
SOURCE: ALEXA INTERNET, USING FIGURES PUBLISHED IN DECEMBER 2021. NOTES: ALEXA INTERNET IS THE NAME OF AMAZON’S INSIGHTS ARM, AND DATA SHOWN HERE ARE NOT RESTRICTED TO ACTIVITIES
ON ALEXA VOICE PLATFORMS. “TIME PER DAY” FIGURES REPRESENT THE AVERAGE DAILY AMOUNT OF TIME THAT GLOBAL VISITORS SPEND ON EACH DOMAIN, MEASURED IN MINUTES AND SECONDS. “PAGES
PER DAY” REPRESENT THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF PAGES THAT GLOBAL VISITORS OPEN ON THE DOMAIN EACH DAY. BECAUSE FIGURES FOR “TIME PER DAY” AND “PAGES PER DAY” REFLECT GLOBAL ACTIVITY,
VALUES WILL BE THE SAME ACROSS ALL COUNTRIES. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS.
ROMANIA
MOST-VISITED WEBSITES: ALEXA RANKING
RANKING OF THE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES ACCORDING TO ALEXA INTERNET, BASED ON TOTAL MONTHLY WEBSITE TRAFFIC
FEB
2022
37. 37
0.10% 0.17% 0.03% 0.11%
+233% (+7 BPS) +30.8% (+4 BPS) [UNCHANGED] +450% (+9 BPS)
97.49% 1.55% 0% 0.55%
+0.07% (+7 BPS) -8.8% (-15 BPS) [UNCHANGED] -17.9% (-12 BPS)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
YANDEX DUCKDUCKGO ECOSIA OTHER
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
GOOGLE BING BAIDU YAHOO!
SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF PAGE VIEW REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM EACH SERVICE AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PAGE VIEW REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM
SEARCH ENGINES IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT
70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB TRAFFIC REFERRED BY SEARCH ENGINES THAT ORIGINATED FROM EACH SEARCH SERVICE
SEARCH ENGINE MARKET SHARE
FEB
2022
38. 38
01 VREMEA 100
02 FACEBOOK 72
03 GOOGLE 66
04 TRANSLATE 62
05 YOUTUBE 51
06 YAHOO 48
07 MAIL 47
08 MAIL YAHOO 41
09 METEO 40
10 GOOGLE TRANSLATE 38
11 FILME 38
12 OLX 34
13 STIRI 24
14 EMAG 22
15 DEDEMAN 21
16 WHATSAPP 18
17 TRADUCERE 17
18 WHATSAPP WEB 15
19 DEX 14
20 YOU 14
# SEARCH QUERY INDEX # SEARCH QUERY INDEX
SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, BASED ON SEARCHES CONDUCTED BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021. NOTES: ANY SPELLING ERRORS OR LANGUAGE INCONSISTENCIES IN SEARCH QUERIES
ARE AS PUBLISHED BY GOOGLE TRENDS, AND ARE SHOWN “AS IS”, TO ENABLE READERS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CHANGES IN HOW PEOPLE ENTER WRITTEN LANGUAGE IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS. GOOGLE
DOES NOT PUBLISH ABSOLUTE SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE “INDEX vs. TOP QUERY” COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE SEARCH VOLUMES FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED WITH THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY.
ADVISORY: GOOGLE TRENDS USES DYNAMIC SAMPLING, SO RANK ORDER AND INDEX VALUES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON WHEN THE TOOL IS ACCESSED, EVEN FOR THE SAME TIME PERIOD.
ROMANIA
QUERIES WITH THE GREATEST VOLUME OF GOOGLE SEARCH ACTIVITY BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021
TOP GOOGLE SEARCHES
FEB
2022
39. 39
9.0% 40.7% 23.7% 34.6%
USE VOICE ASSISTANTS (E.G. SIRI,
GOOGLE ASSISTANT) TO FIND
INFORMATION EACH WEEK
VISIT SOCIAL NETWORKS
TO LOOK FOR INFORMATION
ABOUT BRANDS AND PRODUCTS
USE IMAGE RECOGNITION TOOLS
(E.G. GOOGLE LENS, PINTEREST
LENS) ON MOBILE EACH MONTH
USE ONLINE TOOLS TO
TRANSLATE TEXT INTO DIFFERENT
LANGUAGES EACH WEEK
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO ENGAGE IN EACH KIND OF ONLINE ACTIVITY
ACCESSING ONLINE INFORMATION
FEB
2022
40. 40
24.9% 25.3% 29.1% 15.0% 20.3%
90.8% 62.9% 36.5% 33.5% 11.7%
EDUCATIONAL
VIDEO
PRODUCT
REVIEW VIDEO
SPORTS CLIP OR
HIGHLIGHTS VIDEO
GAMING
VIDEO
INFLUENCER
VIDEOS AND VLOGS
ANY KIND
OF VIDEO
MUSIC
VIDEO
COMEDY, MEME,
OR VIRAL VIDEO
TUTORIAL OR
HOW-TO VIDEO
VIDEO
LIVESTREAM
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO WATCH EACH KIND OF VIDEO CONTENT VIA THE INTERNET EACH WEEK
WATCHING ONLINE VIDEO CONTENT
FEB
2022
41. 41
91.4% 92.6% 0H 59M 27.6%
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS
AGED 16 TO 64 WHO STREAM TV
CONTENT OVER THE INTERNET
INTERNET USERS WHO STREAM
TV CONTENT vs. INTERNET USERS
WHO WATCH ANY KIND OF TV
AVERAGE DAILY TIME INTERNET
USERS AGED 16 TO 64 SPEND
WATCHING STREAMING TV
TIME SPENT WATCHING STREAMING
TV AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL
TIME SPENT WATCHING TV
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO WATCH TV CONTENT VIA STREAMING SERVICES (E.G. NETFLIX) EACH MONTH
STREAMING TV CONTENT VIA THE INTERNET
FEB
2022
42. 42
21.7% 27.9% 20.6% 7.6%
LISTEN TO MUSIC
STREAMING SERVICES
LISTEN TO ONLINE RADIO
SHOWS OR STATIONS
LISTEN TO
PODCASTS
LISTEN TO
AUDIO BOOKS
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO LISTEN TO EACH KIND OF AUDIO CONTENT VIA THE INTERNET EACH WEEK
LISTENING TO ONLINE AUDIO CONTENT
FEB
2022
43. 43
21.2% 4.5% 3.6% 3.0%
84.3% 68.9% 52.6% 16.6%
TABLET HAND-HELD GAMING DEVICE MEDIA STREAMING DEVICE VIRTUAL REALITY HEADSET
ANY DEVICE SMARTPHONE LAPTOP OR DESKTOP GAMES CONSOLE
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO PLAY VIDEO GAMES ON EACH KIND OF DEVICE
DEVICES USED TO PLAY VIDEO GAMES
FEB
2022
44. 44
$30.31 $31.23 $17.52 $16.34
MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
+51.9% (+$10 MILLION) +43.1% (+$9.4 MILLION) +60.1% (+$6.6 MILLION) +64.2% (+$6.4 MILLION)
886.3 $258.9 $132.2 $31.31
THOUSAND MILLION MILLION MILLION
+25.0% (+177 THOUSAND) +57.1% (+$94 MILLION) +57.5% (+$48 MILLION) +72.1% (+$13 MILLION)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
VALUE OF SMART HOME
SECURITY DEVICE MARKET
VALUE OF SMART HOME
ENTERTAINMENT DEVICE MARKET
VALUE OF SMART HOME
COMFORT & LIGHTING MARKET
VALUE OF SMART HOME
ENERGY MANAGEMENT MARKET
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
NUMBER OF HOMES WITH
SMART HOME DEVICES
TOTAL ANNUAL VALUE OF THE
SMART HOME DEVICES MARKET
VALUE OF SMART HOME
APPLIANCES MARKET
VALUE OF SMART HOME CONTROL
& CONNECTIVITY DEVICE MARKET
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: “SMART HOME DEVICES” INCLUDE: DIGITALLY CONNECTED AND CONTROLLED HOME DEVICES THAT CAN BE
REMOTELY CONTROLLED; SENSORS, ACTUATORS AND CLOUD SERVICES THAT ENABLE HOME AUTOMATION; CONTROL HUBS THAT CONNECT SENSORS AND ACTUATORS TO REMOTE CONTROLS AND TO EACH
OTHER; AND SMART HOME-RELATED SOFTWARE SALES (INCLUDING SUBSCRIPTION FEES). DOES NOT INCLUDE SMART TVS, OR B2B OR C2C SALES. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR REVENUES FOR
2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES.
ROMANIA
VALUE OF THE MARKET FOR SMART HOME DEVICES (U.S. DOLLARS)
SMART HOME MARKET OVERVIEW
FEB
2022
45. 45
$93.99 $113 $64.94 $42.87
+17.0% (+$13.65) +12.8% (+$12.84) +21.8% (+$11.64) +20.3% (+$7.23)
11.5% $292 $564 $132
+23.7% (+124 BPS) +25.7% (+$59.79) +19.8% (+$93.37) +34.5% (+$33.89)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
ARPU: SMART HOME
SECURITY DEVICES
ARPU: SMART HOME
ENTERTAINMENT DEVICES
ARPU: SMART HOME
COMFORT & LIGHTING
ARPU: SMART HOME
ENERGY MANAGEMENT
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
PENETRATION OF
SMART HOME DEVICES
ARPU: SPEND ON ALL
SMART HOME DEVICES
ARPU: SMART
HOME APPLIANCES
ARPU: SMART HOME CONTROL
& CONNECTIVITY DEVICES
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: “SMART HOME DEVICES” INCLUDE: DIGITALLY CONNECTED AND CONTROLLED HOME DEVICES THAT CAN BE
REMOTELY CONTROLLED; SENSORS, ACTUATORS AND CLOUD SERVICES THAT ENABLE HOME AUTOMATION; CONTROL HUBS THAT CONNECT SENSORS AND ACTUATORS TO REMOTE CONTROLS AND TO EACH
OTHER; AND SMART HOME-RELATED SOFTWARE SALES (INCLUDING SUBSCRIPTION FEES). DOES NOT INCLUDE SMART TVS, OR B2B OR C2C SALES. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR SPEND PER
SMART HOME FOR 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES.
ROMANIA
AVERAGE ANNUAL SPEND ON SMART HOME DEVICES PER SMART HOME (U.S. DOLLARS)
AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE PER SMART HOME
FEB
2022
46. 46
20.1% 17.9% 7.9%
USE A BANKING, INVESTMENT,
OR INSURANCE WEBSITE OR
MOBILE APP EACH MONTH
USE A MOBILE PAYMENT
SERVICE (E.G. APPLE PAY,
SAMSUNG PAY) EACH MONTH
OWN ANY FORM
OF CRYPTOCURRENCY
(E.G. BITCOIN, ETHER)
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO OWN OR USE EACH KIND OF DIGITAL FINANCIAL SERVICE
USE OF ONLINE FINANCIAL SERVICES
FEB
2022
47. 47
62.0% 30.3% 27.1% 34.7% 15.0%
EXPRESS CONCERN
ABOUT WHAT IS REAL
vs. WHAT IS FAKE
ON THE INTERNET
WORRY ABOUT
HOW COMPANIES
MIGHT USE THEIR
ONLINE DATA
DECLINE COOKIES
ON WEBSITES
AT LEAST SOME
OF THE TIME
USE A TOOL TO BLOCK
ADVERTISEMENTS ON
THE INTERNET AT LEAST
SOME OF THE TIME
USE A VIRTUAL PRIVATE
NETWORK (VPN) TO
ACCESS THE INTERNET AT
LEAST SOME OF THE TIME
SOURCES: DATA FOR “CONCERNS ABOUT WHAT IS REAL vs WHAT IS FAKE ON THE INTERNET” VIA REUTERS INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF JOURNALISM’S “DIGITAL NEWS REPORT 2021”. FIGURES REPRESENT THE
FINDINGS OF A GLOBAL STUDY OF ONLINE NEWS CONSUMERS AGED 18+ IN 46 COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD (SEE DIGITALNEWSREPORT.ORG FOR MORE DETAILS). DATA FOR ALL OTHER DATA POINTS VIA
GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PERSPECTIVES AND ACTIVITIES OF ONLINE ADULTS RELATING TO THEIR ONLINE DATA PRIVACY AND SECURITY
ONLINE PRIVACY AND SECURITY
FEB
2022
49. 49
69.7% 80.2% 79.2% 50.0% 50.0%
13.30 +10.8% 2H 19M +2.2% 6.5
MILLION +1.3 MILLION +3 MINS
SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
vs. POPULATION AGE 13+
SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FEMALE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
vs. TOTAL SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
MALE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
vs. TOTAL SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
NUMBER OF SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT
USING SOCIAL MEDIA
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN TIME
SPENT USING SOCIAL MEDIA
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SOCIAL
PLATFORMS USED EACH MONTH
SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS; CNNIC; TECHRASA; OCDH; U.N.; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. DATA FOR TIME SPENT AND AVERAGE NUMBER OF
PLATFORMS: GWI (Q3 2021). SEE GWI.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTE: FIGURE FOR “AVERAGE NUMBER OF SOCIAL PLATFORMS USED EACH MONTH” INCLUDES DATA FOR YOUTUBE. ADVISORY: SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA
REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR FURTHER DETAILS.
ROMANIA
HEADLINES FOR SOCIAL MEDIA ADOPTION AND USE (NOTE: USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS)
OVERVIEW OF SOCIAL MEDIA USE
FEB
2022
50. 50
CHANGE
IN
DATA
SOURCE
6.60 M
7.60 M
8.30 M
9.40 M
10.0 M
11.0 M 11.0 M
12.0 M
13.3 M
+15.2% +9.2% +13.3% +6.4% +10.0% 0% +9.1% [N/A]
JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES ABOVE BARS, “K” DENOTES THOUSANDS (E.G.
“123 K” = 123,000), “M” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 M” = 1,230,000), AND “B” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS. ADVISORY:
SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: CHANGES TO DATA SOURCES AND SIGNIFICANT BASE REVISIONS IN SOURCE DATA MAY MEAN THAT FIGURES ARE NOT
COMPARABLE BETWEEN CERTAIN YEARS.
ROMANIA
NUMBER OF SOCIAL MEDIA USERS AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
SOCIAL MEDIA USERS OVER TIME
FEB
2022
DATAREPORTAL
51. 51
2.2% 2.1%
9.9% 9.9%
10.8%
12.0%
9.9% 9.9%
9.0%
8.4%
5.2%
3.9% 3.8%
2.9%
13 – 17
YEARS OLD
18 – 24
YEARS OLD
25 – 34
YEARS OLD
35 – 44
YEARS OLD
45 – 54
YEARS OLD
55 – 64
YEARS OLD
65+
YEARS OLD
FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE
SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. NOTE: META ONLY PERMITS PEOPLE AGED 13 AND ABOVE TO USE ITS PLATFORMS, SO WHILE THERE MAY BE USERS BELOW THE AGE OF 13, THEY
DO NOT FEATURE IN THE AVAILABLE DATA. META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE”. COMPARABILITY: IMPORTANT BASE DATA REVISIONS AND SOURCE
REPORTING CHANGES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH VALUES PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
SHARE OF COMBINED, DEDUPLICATED POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH ACROSS FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM, AND MESSENGER, BY AGE AND GENDER
DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF META’S AD AUDIENCE
FEB
2022
DATAREPORTAL
52. 52
62.5%
47.2%
43.8%
42.0%
40.4%
31.5%
29.6%
27.9%
27.6%
24.4%
22.5%
22.2%
21.4%
21.0%
19.8%
KEEPING IN TOUCH WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY
AVOIDING MISSING OUT (FOMO)
FILLING SPARE TIME
READING NEWS STORIES
LOOKING FOR THINGS TO DO OR BUY
FINDING CONTENT
FINDING PRODUCTS TO PURCHASE
MAKING NEW CONTACTS
SHARING OPINIONS
SEEING WHAT’S BEING TALKED ABOUT
FINDING LIKE-MINDED PEOPLE
WATCHING LIVE STREAMS
FOLLOWING SPORTS
FINDING CONTENT FROM BRANDS
CELEBRITIES AND INFLUENCERS
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PRIMARY REASONS WHY INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 USE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS
MAIN REASONS FOR USING SOCIAL MEDIA
FEB
2022
53. 53
91.0%
89.2%
82.5%
63.4%
48.0%
36.0%
22.5%
21.9%
21.4%
20.5%
19.0%
16.0%
11.4%
10.9%
6.9%
FACEBOOK
WHATSAPP
FACEBOOK MESSENGER
INSTAGRAM
TIKTOK
PINTEREST
LINKEDIN
SKYPE
SNAPCHAT
TWITTER
TELEGRAM
IMESSAGE
DISCORD
REDDIT
VIBER
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS. NOTE: YOUTUBE IS NOT OFFERED AS AN
ANSWER OPTION FOR THIS QUESTION IN GWI’S SURVEY. COMPARABILITY: A VERSION OF THIS CHART THAT APPEARED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS WAS BASED ON A PREVIOUS QUESTION IN GWI’S SURVEY
THAT INCLUDED YOUTUBE AS AN ANSWER OPTION. GWI’S CURRENT SURVEY FEATURES A REVISED VERSION OF THIS QUESTION THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE YOUTUBE AS AN ANSWER OPTION, WHILE OTHER
CHANGES TO THE QUESTION’S WORDING MAY MEAN THAT THE VALUES AND RANK ORDER SHOWN HERE ARE NOT DIRECTLY COMPARABLE WITH THOSE SHOWN ON A SIMILAR CHART IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO USE EACH PLATFORM EACH MONTH
MOST-USED SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS
FEB
2022
55. 55
7.4% 3.7% 10.6% 4.5%
68.3% 40.7% 21.1% 22.2%
ANY KIND OF SOCIAL
MEDIA PLATFORM
SOCIAL
NETWORKS
QUESTION & ANSWER
SITES (E.G. QUORA)
FORUMS AND
MESSAGE BOARDS
MESSAGING AND
LIVE CHAT SERVICES
MICRO-BLOGS
(E.G. TWITTER)
VLOGS (BLOGS IN
A VIDEO FORMAT)
ONLINE PINBOARDS
(E.G. PINTEREST)
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS. NOTE: VALUES FOR “ANY KIND OF SOCIAL
MEDIA PLATFORM” INCLUDE AT LEAST ONE OF: SOCIAL NETWORKS, QUESTION AND ANSWER SITES (E.G. QUORA), FORUMS AND MESSAGE BOARDS, MESSAGING AND LIVE CHAT SERVICES, MICRO-BLOGS
(E.G. TWITTER), BLOGS ON PRODUCTS / BRANDS (NOT SHOWN AS AN INDIVIDUAL VALUE ON THIS CHART), VLOGS (I.E. BLOGS RECORDED IN A VIDEO FORMAT), AND ONLINE PINBOARDS (E.G. PINTEREST).
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO USE EACH SOCIAL MEDIA CHANNEL TO FIND INFORMATION ABOUT BRANDS AND PRODUCTS
USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA FOR BRAND RESEARCH
FEB
2022
56. 56
60.6%
36.6%
33.5%
31.2%
29.8%
29.2%
28.3%
25.1%
24.6%
24.5%
22.2%
21.7%
21.2%
20.4%
17.6%
FRIENDS, FAMILY, AND PEOPLE YOU KNOW
BANDS, SINGERS, AND MUSICIANS
ACTORS, COMEDIANS, AND PERFORMERS
ENTERTAINMENT & MEMES
TV SHOWS OR CHANNELS
RESTAURANTS, CHEFS, AND FOODIES
BRANDS YOU BUY FROM
TRAVEL WRITERS AND COMPANIES
SPORTS PEOPLE AND TEAMS
BRANDS YOU’RE RESEARCHING
PUBLICATIONS YOU READ
WORK-RELATED CONTACTS
INFLUENCERS AND EXPERTS
JOURNALISTS OR NEWS COMPANIES
WORK-RELATED COMPANIES
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO FOLLOW EACH TYPE OF ACCOUNT ON SOCIAL MEDIA
TYPES OF SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS FOLLOWED
FEB
2022
57. 57
0.16% 0.05% 0.05% 0.01% 0.01%
+45.5% (+5 BPS) -50.0% (-5 BPS) +150% (+3 BPS) -66.7% (-2 BPS) [UNCHANGED]
97.23% 0.34% 0.92% 0.61% 0.63%
+2.7% (+255 BPS) -37.0% (-20 BPS) -69.2% (-207 BPS) +35.6% (+16 BPS) -41.1% (-44 BPS)
REDDIT TUMBLR LINKEDIN VKONTAKTE OTHER
FACEBOOK TWITTER PINTEREST INSTAGRAM YOUTUBE
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: SHARE DOES NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC FROM MESSENGER PLATFORMS. DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR A SELECTION OF PLATFORMS, AND PERCENTAGES REFLECT SHARE OF
AVAILABLE PLATFORMS ONLY. FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF WEB PAGE REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM EACH SERVICE AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB PAGE REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM THE
AVAILABLE SELECTION OF SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS ON ANY DEVICE IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A
STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
ROMANIA
SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC ARRIVING ON THIRD-PARTY WEBSITES VIA CLICKS OR TAPS ON LINKS PUBLISHED IN SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS (ANY DEVICE)
WEB TRAFFIC REFERRALS FROM SOCIAL MEDIA
FEB
2022
59. !
In Q4 2021, Meta made some important changes to how its self-service tools report the
potential advertising reach of its platforms, including a move to publishing audience figures as
a range instead of as an absolute number. Our analysis suggests that Meta also revised its base
data, resulting in some important corrections to published audience figures for Facebook and
Messenger. As a result, we are currently unable to provide any figures for changes over time in
these platforms’ audiences, and we advise readers not to compare the advertising audience
figures for Facebook and Messenger contained within this report with figures published for
those platforms in previous reports. For more information, please read our complete notes on
data variance, potential mismatches, and curiosities: https://datareportal.com/notes-on-data.
CHANGES IN META’S DATA REPORTING
60. 60
9.90 51.9% 59.7% 50.5% 49.5%
MILLION
POTENTIAL AUDIENCE
THAT META REPORTS
CAN BE REACHED WITH
ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK’S POTENTIAL
ADVERTISING REACH
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL POPULATION
FACEBOOK’S POTENTIAL
ADVERTISING REACH
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
POPULATION AGED 13+
PERCENTAGE OF
ITS AD AUDIENCE
THAT FACEBOOK
REPORTS IS FEMALE
PERCENTAGE OF
ITS AD AUDIENCE
THAT FACEBOOK
REPORTS IS MALE
SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE.
NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE”. COMPARABILITY: META HAS SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS
BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022
61. 61
98.3% 1.7% 23.1% 75.2%
USE ANY KIND OF
MOBILE PHONE
ONLY USE LAPTOP OR
DESKTOP COMPUTER
USE BOTH COMPUTERS
AND MOBILE PHONES
ONLY USE MOBILE
PHONES (ANY TYPE)
SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES, BASED ON DATA PUBLISHED IN JUNE 2021. NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT VALUES FOR ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK’S ADVERTISING AUDIENCE THAT USES EACH DEVICE TO ACCESS THE PLATFORM, EITHER VIA AN APP OR A WEB BROWSER
DEVICES USED TO ACCESS FACEBOOK
FEB
2022
62. 62
1 1 20 12 12 4 2 1 27 18
1 16 7 1 22
FACEBOOK PAGES
“LIKED” (LIFETIME)
POSTS “LIKED” IN THE
PREVIOUS 30 DAYS
COMMENTS MADE IN
THE PREVIOUS 30 DAYS
POSTS SHARED IN THE
PREVIOUS 30 DAYS
ADS CLICKED OR TAPPED
IN THE PREVIOUS 30 DAYS
FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE
SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES, BASED ON DATA PUBLISHED IN JUNE 2021. NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT MEDIAN VALUES FOR ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE. “ADS” MAY INCLUDE
ANY KIND OF PAID CONTENT PUBLISHED TO FACEBOOK, INCLUDING SPONSORED POSTS.
ROMANIA
THE NUMBER OF TIMES A “TYPICAL” USER AGED 18+ PERFORMS EACH ACTIVITY ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK ACTIVITY FREQUENCY
FEB
2022
63. 63
0.02% 0.02% 0.04% 0.02% 0.41%
AVERAGE FACEBOOK POST
ENGAGEMENTS vs. PAGE
FANS: ALL POST TYPES
AVERAGE FACEBOOK POST
ENGAGEMENTS vs. PAGE
FANS: PHOTO POSTS
AVERAGE FACEBOOK POST
ENGAGEMENTS vs. PAGE
FANS: VIDEO POSTS
AVERAGE FACEBOOK POST
ENGAGEMENTS vs. PAGE
FANS: LINK POSTS
AVERAGE FACEBOOK POST
ENGAGEMENTS vs. PAGE
FANS: STATUS POSTS
SOURCE: LOCOWISE. FIGURES REPRESENT AVERAGES BETWEEN 01 SEPTEMBER 2021 AND 30 NOVEMBER 2021. NOTES: PERCENTAGES COMPARE THE COMBINED TOTAL OF REACTIONS, COMMENTS, AND
SHARES WITH THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE FANS. FIGURES ARE AVERAGES BASED ON A WIDE VARIETY OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF PAGE, WITH DIFFERENT AUDIENCE SIZES, IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES AROUND THE
WORLD. VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
ROMANIA
FACEBOOK PAGE POST ENGAGEMENTS (REACTIONS, COMMENTS, AND SHARES) AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PAGE FANS
FACEBOOK POST ENGAGEMENT BENCHMARKS
FEB
2022
64. 64
11.46 73.9% 50.5% 49.5%
MILLION
13.30 69.7% 79.2% +12.7%
MILLION +1.5 MILLION
POTENTIAL REACH OF
ADS ON YOUTUBE
YOUTUBE AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
YOUTUBE AD REACH vs.
TOTAL INTERNET USERS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN YOUTUBE AD REACH
YOUTUBE’S ADVERTISING
REACH: USERS AGED 18+
YOUTUBE’S AD REACH AGE 18+
vs. TOTAL POPULATION AGE 18+
FEMALE YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+
vs. TOTAL YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+
MALE YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+
vs. TOTAL YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+
SOURCES: GOOGLE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. NOTES: DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL LOCATIONS; FIGURES BASED ON AVAILABLE LOCATIONS ONLY. GOOGLE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER AND AGE DATA FOR
USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE, AND ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE”. FIGURE FOR POTENTIAL REACH AGE 18+ USES A DIFFERENT AUDIENCE TOTAL TO THE ONE USED FOR REACH OF
TOTAL POPULATION.
ROMANIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON YOUTUBE
YOUTUBE: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022
65. 65
01 MUZICA 100
02 TZANCA 57
03 DESENE 48
04 MUSIC 44
05 REMIX 43
06 SALAM 42
07 TZANCA URAGANU 40
08 DANI MOCANU 37
09 MUZICĂ 36
10 MANELE 35
11 FILME SUBTITRATE IN ROMANA 33
12 JADOR 31
13 COLINDE 30
14 FLORIN SALAM 28
15 GUTA 27
16 MINECRAFT 26
17 MAXINFINITE 24
18 BOGDAN 23
19 LECTII DE VIATA 21
20 DESENE ANIMATE 19
# SEARCH QUERY INDEX # SEARCH QUERY INDEX
SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, BASED ON SEARCHES CONDUCTED ON YOUTUBE BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021. NOTE: ANY SPELLING ERRORS OR LANGUAGE INCONSISTENCIES
IN SEARCH QUERIES ARE AS PUBLISHED BY GOOGLE TRENDS, AND ARE SHOWN “AS IS”, TO ENABLE READERS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CHANGES IN HOW PEOPLE ENTER WRITTEN LANGUAGE IN DIGITAL
ENVIRONMENTS. GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH ABSOLUTE SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE “INDEX” COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE SEARCH VOLUMES FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED WITH THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE
TOP QUERY. ADVISORY: GOOGLE TRENDS USES DYNAMIC SAMPLING, SO RANK ORDER AND INDEX VALUES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON WHEN THE TOOL IS ACCESSED, EVEN FOR THE SAME TIME PERIOD.
ROMANIA
QUERIES WITH THE GREATEST VOLUME OF YOUTUBE SEARCH ACTIVITY BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021
TOP YOUTUBE SEARCHES
FEB
2022
66. 66
32.2% 32.5% 51.9% 48.1%
5.40 28.3% +5.9% +8.0%
MILLION +300 THOUSAND +400 THOUSAND
90
INSTAGRAM AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
INSTAGRAM AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE INSTAGRAM AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INSTAGRAM AD REACH
MALE INSTAGRAM AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INSTAGRAM AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON INSTAGRAM
INSTAGRAM AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN INSTAGRAM AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN INSTAGRAM AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE MAY NOT BE COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON INSTAGRAM
INSTAGRAM: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022
67. 67
37.9% 41.0% 50.8% 49.2%
6.37 33.4% +13.3% [N/A]
MILLION +750 THOUSAND [NEW DATA POINT]
90
TIKTOK AD REACH AGE 18+
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
TIKTOK AD REACH AGE 18+
vs. POPULATION AGE 18+
FEMALE TIKTOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL TIKTOK AD REACH
MALE TIKTOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL TIKTOK AD REACH
POTENTIAL REACH OF ADS
ON TIKTOK (AGE 18+ ONLY)
TIKTOK AD REACH AGE 18+
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER
CHANGE IN TIKTOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN TIKTOK AD REACH
SOURCES: BYTEDANCE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE
TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. NOTES: DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL LOCATIONS; FIGURES BASED ON AVAILABLE LOCATIONS ONLY. FIGURES USE THE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. BYTEDANCE’S
ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH AUDIENCE DATA FOR USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE, BUT ALLOW MARKETERS TO TARGET ADS TO USERS AGED 13 AND ABOVE. BYTEDANCE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES
ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE”.
ROMANIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE AGED 18+ THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON TIKTOK
TIKTOK: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022
68. 68
8.15 42.7% 49.1% 51.8% 48.2%
MILLION
POTENTIAL AUDIENCE
THAT META REPORTS
CAN BE REACHED WITH
ADS ON MESSENGER
MESSENGER’S POTENTIAL
ADVERTISING REACH
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL POPULATION
MESSENGER’S POTENTIAL
ADVERTISING REACH
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
POPULATION AGED 13+
PERCENTAGE OF
ITS AD AUDIENCE
THAT MESSENGER
REPORTS IS FEMALE
PERCENTAGE OF
ITS AD AUDIENCE
THAT MESSENGER
REPORTS IS MALE
SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE.
SOME MESSENGER AD FORMATS ARE CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE IN AUSTRALIA, CANADA, FRANCE, AND THE UNITED STATES, AND THIS MAY HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH
FIGURES IN THOSE COUNTRIES. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE”. COMPARABILITY: META
HAS SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK MESSENGER
MESSENGER: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022
69. 69
19.1% 20.6% 52.0% 48.0%
3.20 16.8% 0% +6.7%
MILLION [UNCHANGED] +200 THOUSAND
90
LINKEDIN AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
LINKEDIN AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 18+
FEMALE LINKEDIN AD REACH
vs. TOTAL LINKEDIN AD REACH
MALE LINKEDIN AD REACH
vs. TOTAL LINKEDIN AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON LINKEDIN
LINKEDIN AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN LINKEDIN AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN LINKEDIN AD REACH
SOURCES: MICROSOFT’S LINKEDIN ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES
FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE OR REGISTERED MEMBER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN
DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTE: REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY: THE FIGURES
PUBLISHED IN LINKEDIN’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES REFLECT TOTAL REGISTERED MEMBERS (NOT ACTIVE USERS), SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT DIRECTLY COMPARABLE WITH OTHER PLATFORMS.
ROMANIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON LINKEDIN
LINKEDIN: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022
70. 70
15.8% 16.0% 61.6% 37.5%
2.65 13.9% +3.9% +12.8%
MILLION +100 THOUSAND +300 THOUSAND
90
SNAPCHAT AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
SNAPCHAT AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE SNAPCHAT AD REACH
vs. TOTAL SNAPCHAT AD REACH
MALE SNAPCHAT AD REACH
vs. TOTAL SNAPCHAT AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON SNAPCHAT
SNAPCHAT AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN SNAPCHAT AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN SNAPCHAT AD REACH
SOURCES: SNAP’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL LOCATIONS; FIGURES BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA ONLY, USING MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES.
GENDER DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS, BUT GENDER AUDIENCE VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO THE TOTAL AUDIENCE FIGURE, SO GENDER PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100%.
ROMANIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON SNAPCHAT
SNAPCHAT: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022
71. 71
717.7 3.8% 4.3% 4.3% -19.2%
THOUSAND -171 THOUSAND
90
POTENTIAL AUDIENCE
THAT TWITTER REPORTS
CAN BE REACHED WITH
ADS ON TWITTER
TWITTER’S POTENTIAL
ADVERTISING REACH
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL POPULATION
TWITTER’S POTENTIAL
ADVERTISING REACH
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
POPULATION AGED 13+
TWITTER’S POTENTIAL
ADVERTISING REACH
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL INTERNET USERS
QUARTER-ON-
QUARTER CHANGE IN
TWITTER’S POTENTIAL
ADVERTISING REACH
SOURCES: TWITTER’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. FIGURES PUBLISHED IN TWITTER’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ARE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT FLUCTUATION, EVEN WITHIN SHORT PERIODS OF TIME.
NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. DUE TO ANOMALIES IN SOURCE DATA, WE ARE CURRENTLY UNABLE TO OFFER DATA FOR TWITTER USE BY GENDER. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES.
ROMANIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON TWITTER
TWITTER: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022
72. 72
10.5% 10.7% 76.9% 18.1%
1.77 9.3% -4.6% +35.2%
MILLION -85 THOUSAND +461 THOUSAND
90
PINTEREST AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
PINTEREST AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE PINTEREST AD REACH
vs. TOTAL PINTEREST AD REACH
MALE PINTEREST AD REACH
vs. TOTAL PINTEREST AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON PINTEREST
PINTEREST AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN PINTEREST AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN PINTEREST AD REACH
SOURCES: PINTEREST’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE
TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL LOCATIONS; FIGURES BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA ONLY, USING MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES.
PINTEREST’S TOOLS ALSO PUBLISH DATA FOR USER OF “UNSPECIFIED” GENDER, SO VALUES FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” REACH SHOWN HERE MAY NOT SUM TO 100%.
ROMANIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON PINTEREST
PINTEREST: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022
74. 74
27.41 143.7% +3.9% 82.4%
MILLION +1.0 MILLION
NUMBER OF CELLULAR
MOBILE CONNECTIONS
(EXCLUDING IOT)
NUMBER OF CELLULAR MOBILE
CONNECTIONS COMPARED
WITH TOTAL POPULATION
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR
MOBILE CONNECTIONS
SHARE OF CELLULAR MOBILE
CONNECTIONS THAT ARE
BROADBAND (3G, 4G, 5G)
SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE. NOTES: TOTAL CELLULAR CONNECTIONS INCLUDE DEVICES OTHER THAN MOBILE PHONES, BUT EXCLUDE CELLULAR IOT CONNECTIONS. FIGURES MAY SIGNIFICANTLY EXCEED
FIGURES FOR POPULATION DUE TO MULTIPLE CONNECTIONS AND CONNECTED DEVICES PER PERSON. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. VERSIONS OF THIS CHART PUBLISHED IN SOME OF OUR PREVIOUS
REPORTS FEATURED CELLULAR CONNECTION FIGURES THAT INCLUDED CELLULAR IOT CONNECTIONS. FIGURES SHOWN HERE DO NOT INCLUDE CELLULAR IOT CONNECTIONS.
ROMANIA
USE OF MOBILE PHONES AND DEVICES THAT CONNECT TO CELLULAR NETWORKS
MOBILE CONNECTIVITY
FEB
2022
75. 75
27.4 M 27.1 M 26.9 M 26.5 M 26.4 M
27.4 M
-1.1% -0.8% -1.3% -0.5% +3.9%
Q4 2016 Q4 2017 Q4 2018 Q4 2019 Q4 2020 Q4 2021
SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES ABOVE BARS, “K” DENOTES THOUSANDS (E.G. “123 K” = 123,000), “M” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 M” = 1,230,000),
AND “B” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS. COMPARABILITY: BASE REVISIONS. NUMBERS MAY NOT CORRELATE WITH VALUES
PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
NUMBER OF CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS OVER TIME
FEB
2022
76. 76
$80.28 7.2% $1.18 0.1%
PRICE OF THE
CHEAPEST SMARTPHONE
HANDSET (IN USD)
PRICE OF THE CHEAPEST
SMARTPHONE HANDSET
vs. AVERAGE INCOME
AVERAGE PRICE OF
1GB OF CELLULAR
MOBILE DATA (IN USD)
AVERAGE PRICE OF 1GB
OF CELLULAR MOBILE DATA
vs. AVERAGE INCOME
SOURCES: HANDSET PRICES: ALLIANCE FOR AFFORDABLE INTERNET; ACCESS THE FULL DATASET AT A4AI.ORG. MOBILE DATA PRICES: CABLE.CO.UK; WORLD BANK. COMPARABILITY: VALUE FOR HANDSET PRICES
vs. MONTHLY INCOME AS PUBLISHED BY A4AI, AND MAY USE A DIFFERENT VALUE FOR AVERAGE MONTHLY INCOME COMPARED WITH THE DATA USED TO CALCULATE THE PRICE OF 1GB OF MOBILE DATA vs.
MONTHLY INCOME. AS A RESULT, VALUES MAY NOT CORRELATE ACROSS DATA POINTS.
ROMANIA
THE COST OF BUYING A SMARTPHONE HANDSET AND 1GB OF CELLULAR MOBILE DATA, AND COMPARISONS WITH AVERAGE MONTHLY INCOME
AFFORDABILITY OF MOBILE INTERNET ACCESS
FEB
2022
77. 77
79.04% 20.55% 0.34% 0% 0.07%
-1.3% (-104 BPS) +5.6% (+109 BPS) -2.9% (-1 BP) [UNCHANGED] -36.4% (-4 BPS)
SHARE OF MOBILE WEB
TRAFFIC ORIGINATING
FROM ANDROID DEVICES
SHARE OF MOBILE WEB
TRAFFIC ORIGINATING
FROM APPLE IOS DEVICES
SHARE OF MOBILE WEB
TRAFFIC ORIGINATING FROM
SAMSUNG OS DEVICES
SHARE OF MOBILE WEB
TRAFFIC ORIGINATING
FROM KAI OS DEVICES
SHARE OF MOBILE WEB
TRAFFIC ORIGINATING
FROM OTHER OS DEVICES
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF WEB PAGES SERVED TO BROWSERS ON MOBILE PHONES RUNNING EACH OPERATING SYSTEM COMPARED WITH THE TOTAL NUMBER
OF WEB PAGES SERVED TO MOBILE BROWSERS IN NOVEMBER 2021. FIGURES FOR SAMSUNG OS REFER ONLY TO THOSE DEVICES RUNNING OPERATING SYSTEMS DEVELOPED BY SAMSUNG (E.G. BADA AND
TIZEN), AND DO NOT INCLUDE SAMSUNG DEVICES RUNNING ANDROID. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD
EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF WEB PAGE REQUESTS ORIGINATING FROM MOBILE HANDSETS RUNNING EACH MOBILE OPERATING SYSTEM
SHARE OF MOBILE WEB TRAFFIC BY MOBILE OS
FEB
2022
78. 78
476.0 -10% $190.0 +13%
MILLION MILLION
TOTAL NUMBER
OF MOBILE APP
DOWNLOADS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN THE TOTAL NUMBER OF
MOBILE APP DOWNLOADS
ANNUAL CONSUMER
SPEND ON MOBILE APPS
AND IN-APP PURCHASES (USD)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN
CONSUMER SPEND ON MOBILE
APPS AND IN-APP PURCHASES
SOURCES: APP ANNIE “STATE OF MOBILE 2022” REPORT. SEE STATEOFMOBILE2022.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT COMBINED CONSUMER ACTIVITY ACROSS THE GOOGLE PLAY STORE,
APPLE IOS APP STORE, AND THIRD-PARTY ANDROID APP STORES BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021. “CONSUMER SPEND” ONLY INCLUDES SPEND ON APPS AND IN-APP PURCHASES VIA APP STORES, AND
DOES NOT INCLUDE REVENUES FROM ECOMMERCE TRANSACTIONS OR MOBILE ADVERTISING. CONSUMER SPEND FIGURES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS.
ROMANIA
HEADLINES FOR MOBILE APP DOWNLOADS AND CONSUMER SPEND (IN U.S. DOLLARS) BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021
MOBILE APP MARKET OVERVIEW
FEB
2022
80. 80
53.4% 62.4% 10.2% 13.5% 44.8% 54.4% 3.8% 2.1%
45.2% 49.5% 16.3% 14.8% 12.1% 12.5% 11.9% 12.0%
47.2% 15.6% 12.3% 12.0%
57.6% 11.7% 49.4% 3.0%
FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE
MADE OR RECEIVED DIGITAL
PAYMENTS IN THE PAST YEAR
MADE A PURCHASE ON THE
INTERNET IN THE PAST YEAR
USED ONLINE BANKING
IN THE PAST YEAR
USED THE INTERNET TO
PAY BILLS IN THE PAST YEAR
FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE
ACCOUNT WITH A
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
CREDIT CARD
OWNERSHIP
DEBIT CARD
OWNERSHIP
MOBILE MONEY ACCOUNT
(E.G. MPESA, GCASH)
SOURCE: WORLD BANK. NOTES: SOME FIGURES HAVE NOT BEEN UPDATED IN THE PAST YEAR, SO MAY BE LESS REPRESENTATIVE OF CURRENT BEHAVIOURS. PERCENTAGES ARE OF ADULTS AGED 15 AND ABOVE,
NOT OF TOTAL POPULATION. MOBILE MONEY ACCOUNTS ONLY REFER TO SERVICES THAT STORE FUNDS IN AN ELECTRONIC WALLET LINKED DIRECTLY TO A PHONE NUMBER, SUCH AS MPESA, GCASH, AND
TIGO PESA. FIGURES FOR MOBILE MONEY ACCOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE PEOPLE WHO USE ‘OVER-THE-TOP’ MOBILE PAYMENT SERVICES SUCH AS APPLE PAY, GOOGLE PAY, OR SAMSUNG PAY.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT OWNS OR USES EACH PRODUCT OR SERVICE
FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORS
FEB
2022
81. 81
45.1% 18.5% 6.1% 23.4% 3.2%
PURCHASED A PRODUCT
OR SERVICE ONLINE
ORDERED GROCERIES
VIA AN ONLINE STORE
BOUGHT A SECOND-HAND
ITEM VIA AN ONLINE STORE
USED AN ONLINE PRICE
COMPARISON SERVICE
USED A BUY NOW,
PAY LATER SERVICE
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO ENGAGE IN SELECTED ECOMMERCE ACTIVITIES EACH WEEK
WEEKLY ONLINE SHOPPING ACTIVITIES
FEB
2022
82. 82
69.6%
45.3%
42.6%
39.3%
34.2%
32.5%
29.3%
17.7%
15.1%
14.2%
12.5%
12.0%
10.7%
9.1%
6.8%
FREE DELIVERY
CUSTOMER REVIEWS
COUPONS AND DISCOUNTS
EASY RETURNS
LOYALTY POINTS
NEXT-DAY DELIVERY
SIMPLE ONLINE CHECKOUT
COMPETITIONS
“GUEST” CHECK-OUT
INTEREST-FREE INSTALMENT OPTION
“LIKES” AND COMMENTS ON SOCIAL
ECO-FRIENDLY CREDENTIALS
CLICK & COLLECT
LIVE-CHAT BOX
EXCLUSIVE CONTENT
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO SAY EACH FACTOR WOULD ENCOURAGE THEM TO COMPLETE AN ONLINE PURCHASE
ONLINE PURCHASE DRIVERS
FEB
2022
83. 83
9.20 $5.81 $631 41.5%
MILLION BILLION
+10.3% (+860 THOUSAND) +43.4% (+$1.8 BILLION) +30.0% (+$146) +3.1% (+124 BPS)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
NUMBER OF PEOPLE
PURCHASING CONSUMER
GOODS VIA THE INTERNET
TOTAL ANNUAL SPEND
ON ONLINE CONSUMER
GOODS PURCHASES (USD)
AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE
PER CONSUMER GOODS
ECOMMERCE USER (USD)
SHARE OF CONSUMER GOODS
ECOMMERCE SPEND ATTRIBUTABLE TO
PURCHASES MADE VIA MOBILE PHONES
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: “CONSUMER GOODS” INCLUDE: ELECTRONICS, FASHION, FURNITURE, TOYS, HOBBY, DIY, BEAUTY, CONSUMER
HEALTHCARE, PERSONAL CARE, HOUSEHOLD CARE, FOOD, BEVERAGES, AND PHYSICAL MEDIA. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE
PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%).
“BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
HEADLINES FOR THE ADOPTION AND USE OF CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE (B2C ONLY)
OVERVIEW OF CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE
FEB
2022
84. 84
$911.2 $163.5 $35.11 $102.8
MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
+44.3% (+$280 MILLION) +47.5% (+$53 MILLION) +43.8% (+$11 MILLION) +12.6% (+$12 MILLION)
$1.23 $2.74 $152.5 $475.2
BILLION BILLION MILLION MILLION
+49.5% (+$406 MILLION) +41.8% (+$809 MILLION) +40.9% (+$44 MILLION) +44.2% (+$146 MILLION)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
PERSONAL & HOUSEHOLD CARE FOOD BEVERAGES PHYSICAL MEDIA
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
ELECTRONICS FASHION FURNITURE TOYS, HOBBY, DIY
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR REVENUES FOR 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH
EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. THE “PERSONAL & HOUSEHOLD CARE” CATEGORY INCLUDES BEAUTY AND CONSUMER HEALTHCARE. THE “PHYSICAL MEDIA” CATEGORY DOES NOT
INCLUDE DIGITAL DOWNLOADS OR STREAMING. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
ANNUAL SPEND IN EACH CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE CATEGORY (U.S. DOLLARS, B2C ONLY)
ECOMMERCE: CONSUMER GOODS CATEGORIES
FEB
2022
85. 85
01 EMAG 100
02 NIKE 93
03 DEDEMAN 67
04 JORDAN 47
05 OLX 41
06 ADIDASI 41
07 ALTEX 38
08 SINSAY 37
09 ROCHII 25
10 AIR FORCE 1 22
11 LEGO 18
12 HUAWEI 17
13 TRANSLATE 13
14 IPHONE 12 13
15 ADIDASI NIKE 12
16 NIKE AIR FORCE 1 12
17 IPHONE 11 11
18 GHETE DAMA 11
19 VANS 11
20 IPHONE X 9
# SEARCH QUERY INDEX # SEARCH QUERY INDEX
SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, BASED ON GOOGLE SHOPPING SEARCHES CONDUCTED BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021. NOTES: ANY SPELLING ERRORS OR LANGUAGE INCONSISTENCIES
IN SEARCH QUERIES ARE AS PUBLISHED BY GOOGLE TRENDS, AND ARE SHOWN “AS IS”, TO ENABLE READERS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CHANGES IN HOW PEOPLE USE LANGUAGE IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS.
GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH ABSOLUTE SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE “INDEX vs. TOP QUERY” COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE SEARCH VOLUMES FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED WITH THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE
TOP QUERY. ADVISORY: GOOGLE TRENDS USES DYNAMIC SAMPLING, SO RANK ORDER AND INDEX VALUES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON WHEN THE TOOL IS ACCESSED, EVEN FOR THE SAME TIME PERIOD.
ROMANIA
QUERIES WITH THE GREATEST VOLUME OF GOOGLE SHOPPING SEARCH ACTIVITY BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021
TOP GOOGLE SHOPPING QUERIES
FEB
2022
86. 86
$218.0 $214.4 $73.50 $660
MILLION MILLION MILLION THOUSAND
+43% (+$65 MILLION) +76% (+$93 MILLION) +46% (+$23 MILLION) +324% (+$504 THOUSAND)
$347.7 $56.26 $23.78 $18.76
MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
+35% (+$90 MILLION) -7.2% (-$4.4 MILLION) +53% (+$8.2 MILLION) +0.2% (+$32 THOUSAND)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
HOTELS PACKAGE HOLIDAYS VACATION RENTALS CRUISES
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
FLIGHTS CAR RENTALS TRAINS LONG-DISTANCE BUSES
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK; STATISTA MOBILITY MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR REVENUES FOR 2021 IN
U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. VALUES DO NOT INCLUDE REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH PUBLIC TRANSPORT, NON-COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS,
FERRIES, TAXIS, RIDE-SHARING, RIDE-HAILING, OR CHAUFFEUR SERVICES. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
ANNUAL SPEND ON ONLINE TRAVEL AND TOURISM SERVICES (U.S. DOLLARS)
ONLINE TRAVEL AND TOURISM
FEB
2022
87. 87
$374.9 $195.0 $67.26 $83.05 $29.52
MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
+25.0% (+$75 MILLION) +21.9% (+$35 MILLION) +24.8% (+$13 MILLION) +32.1% (+$20 MILLION) +27.6% (+$6.4 MILLION)
TOTAL VIDEO GAMES VIDEO-ON-DEMAND EPUBLISHING DIGITAL MUSIC
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR SPEND IN 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH
EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. INCLUDES CONTENT DOWNLOADS AND SUBSCRIPTIONS TO STREAMING SERVICES AND ONLINE PUBLISHERS. DOES NOT INCLUDE PHYSICAL MEDIA
OR USER-GENERATED CONTENT. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
ANNUAL SPEND ON DIGITAL MEDIA DOWNLOADS AND SUBSCRIPTIONS
DIGITAL MEDIA SPEND
FEB
2022
88. 88
4.02 +11.9% $147.3 +26.1% $36.64
MILLION +426 THOUSAND MILLION +$31 MILLION YOY: +13%
NUMBER OF PEOPLE
ORDERING FOOD DELIVERY
VIA ONLINE PLATFORMS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN
THE NUMBER OF ONLINE
FOOD DELIVERY USERS
TOTAL ANNUAL VALUE
OF ONLINE FOOD
DELIVERY ORDERS (USD)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN THE VALUE OF ONLINE
FOOD DELIVERY ORDERS
AVERAGE ANNUAL VALUE
OF ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY
ORDERS PER USER (USD)
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE
PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. ONLY INCLUDES ORDERS MADE VIA ONLINE SERVICES. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A
STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES
ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
HEADLINES FOR THE ADOPTION AND USE OF ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY SERVICES
ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY OVERVIEW
FEB
2022
89. 89
9.24 +10.4% $6.25 +41.0% $676
MILLION +867 THOUSAND BILLION +$1.8 BILLION YOY: +28%
NUMBER OF
PEOPLE MAKING
DIGITAL PAYMENTS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE
MAKING DIGITAL PAYMENTS
TOTAL ANNUAL VALUE
OF DIGITAL PAYMENT
TRANSACTIONS (USD)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN THE VALUE OF DIGITAL
PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS
AVERAGE ANNUAL VALUE
OF DIGITAL PAYMENTS
PER USER (USD)
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: “DIGITAL PAYMENTS” INCLUDE MOBILE P.O.S. PAYMENTS (E.G. PAYMENTS VIA APPLE PAY OR SAMSUNG PAY), B2C
DIGITAL COMMERCE, AND B2C DIGITAL REMITTANCES. VALUES DO NOT INCLUDE B2B TRANSACTIONS. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR FOR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES
FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%,
NOT 70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
HEADLINES FOR THE ADOPTION AND USE OF DIGITALLY ENABLED PAYMENT SERVICES BY END CONSUMERS
OVERVIEW OF CONSUMER DIGITAL PAYMENTS
FEB
2022
91. 91
39.6%
35.7%
29.5%
27.2%
26.0%
26.0%
24.2%
23.9%
23.3%
23.2%
23.0%
22.1%
21.7%
20.2%
19.9%
TV ADS
SEARCH ENGINES
COMPANY EMAILS OR LETTERS
SOCIAL MEDIA ADS
ADS ON WEBSITES
WORD-OF-MOUTH
BROCHURES & CATALOGUES
TV SHOWS AND FILMS
CONSUMER REVIEW SITES
BRAND WEBSITES
ADS ON PUBLIC TRANSPORT
SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS
PRODUCT SAMPLES
BILLBOARDS & POSTERS
IN-STORE DISPLAYS & PROMOTIONS
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO DISCOVER NEW BRANDS, PRODUCTS, AND SERVICES VIA EACH CHANNEL OR MEDIUM
SOURCES OF BRAND DISCOVERY
FEB
2022
92. 92
66.8% 56.7% 21.0% 17.4% 13.6%
RESEARCH BRANDS
ONLINE BEFORE
MAKING A PURCHASE
VISITED A BRAND’S
WEBSITE IN THE
PAST 30 DAYS
CLICKED OR TAPPED
ON A BANNER AD ON A
WEBSITE IN THE PAST 30 DAYS
CLICKED OR TAPPED ON A
SPONSORED SOCIAL MEDIA
POST IN THE PAST 30 DAYS
DOWNLOADED OR
USED A BRANDED MOBILE
APP IN THE PAST 30 DAYS
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO SAY THEY ENGAGE IN EACH KIND OF ONLINE ACTIVITY
ENGAGEMENT WITH DIGITAL MARKETING
FEB
2022
93. 93
58.9%
47.5%
40.7%
36.4%
28.2%
24.9%
23.9%
22.2%
21.1%
16.1%
14.5%
13.8%
10.6%
7.4%
4.5%
SEARCH ENGINES
CONSUMER REVIEWS
SOCIAL NETWORKS
BRAND WEBSITES
PRICE COMPARISON SITES
SPECIALIST REVIEW SITES
MOBILE APPS
FORUMS & MESSAGE BOARDS
Q&A SITES
DISCOUNT COUPON SITES
BRAND & PRODUCT BLOGS
VIDEO SITES
VLOGS
MESSAGING & LIVE CHAT
ONLINE PINBOARDS
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
ROMANIA
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO USE EACH CHANNEL AS A PRIMARY SOURCE OF INFORMATION WHEN RESEARCHING BRANDS
MAIN CHANNELS FOR ONLINE BRAND RESEARCH
FEB
2022
94. 94
$542.5 $188.3 $261.2 $83.31 $9.72
MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
+17.0% (+$79 MILLION) +16.9% (+$27 MILLION) +14.0% (+$32 MILLION) +29.3% (+$19 MILLION) +8.5% (+$764 THOUSAND)
TOTAL SEARCH ADS BANNER ADS VIDEO ADS CLASSIFIEDS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR SPEND IN 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH
EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. DOES NOT INCLUDE ADVERTISING REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMAIL MARKETING, AUDIO ADS, INFLUENCER MARKETING, SPONSORSHIPS,
PRODUCT PLACEMENT, OR COMMISSION-BASED AFFILIATE SYSTEMS. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
ANNUAL SPEND ON DIGITAL ADVERTISING, WITH DETAIL BY ADVERTISING FORMAT (U.S. DOLLARS)
VALUE OF THE DIGITAL ADVERTISING MARKET
FEB
2022
95. 95
40.6% -0.3% $220.5 +16.7%
-10 BPS MILLION +$32 MILLION
SOCIAL MEDIA’S SHARE
OF TOTAL DIGITAL
ADVERTISING SPEND
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN
SOCIAL MEDIA’S SHARE OF TOTAL
DIGITAL ADVERTISING SPEND
ANNUAL SPEND
ON SOCIAL MEDIA
ADVERTISING (USD)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN SOCIAL MEDIA
ADVERTISING SPEND
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR
THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. DOES NOT INCLUDE ADVERTISING REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMAIL MARKETING, AUDIO ADS, INFLUENCER MARKETING,
SPONSORSHIPS, PRODUCT PLACEMENT, OR COMMISSION-BASED AFFILIATE SYSTEMS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL
60%, NOT 70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
SOCIAL MEDIA’S SHARE OF THE DIGITAL ADVERTISING MARKET
SOCIAL MEDIA ADVERTISING OVERVIEW
FEB
2022
96. 96
83.8% +0.3% $454.5 +17.4%
+26 BPS MILLION +$67 MILLION
PROGRAMMATIC’S
SHARE OF TOTAL DIGITAL
ADVERTISING SPEND
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN
PROGRAMMATIC’S SHARE OF
TOTAL DIGITAL ADVERTISING SPEND
ANNUAL SPEND ON
PROGRAMMATIC
ADVERTISING (USD)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN PROGRAMMATIC
ADVERTISING SPEND (USD)
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR
THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. DOES NOT INCLUDE ADVERTISING REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMAIL MARKETING, AUDIO ADS, INFLUENCER MARKETING,
SPONSORSHIPS, PRODUCT PLACEMENT, OR COMMISSION-BASED AFFILIATE SYSTEMS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL
60%, NOT 70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
SHARE OF DIGITAL ADVERTISING FULFILLED VIA PROGRAMMATIC TECHNOLOGIES
PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING OVERVIEW
FEB
2022
100. Learn more at kepios.com
LEARN MORE »
LEARN MORE »
LEARN MORE »
LEARN MORE »
LEARN MORE »
Go beyond headlines and
hypotheses to understand
what people are really doing
online, and turn insights into
actionable plans and results.
We research and produce
white-label content and co-
branded reports that offer
rich insights into what people
everywhere are doing online.
Add our team’s experience
and insight to your decision-
making. Available through
regular, retained advisory, or
ad hoc for one-off sessions.
Custom keynote presentations
that bring the latest digital
trends to life at conferences,
events, and private meetings,
whether online or in person.
Interactive briefings that
make it easy to keep track of
digital trends, and identify
how evolving behaviours
will impact future success.
CONSUMER
RESEARCH
REPORTS
& CONTENT
ADVISORY
SERVICES
KEYNOTE
PRESENTATIONS
DIGITAL
BRIEFINGS
In addition to producing the Global Digital Reports, we also offer:
Kepios helps the world understand what’s really happening online.
MAKE SENSE OF DIGITAL TRENDS
101. Get closer to your audience with
the world’s largest study on the
online consumer
18M+
consumers data points brands markets
40,000+ 4,000+ 40+
Book free demo
102. Diversity of industries
and topics
Statista bundles statistical data on over
80,000 topics from over 170 industries.
The data comes from over 22,500
sources.
Quick help
for all cases
With Statista, users can obtain
comprehensive overviews and conduct
targeted research – with minimal time
expenditure.
Global data from
numerous countries
Statista offers insights and facts on
industries from 150+ countries.
Markets, companies and consumers
from all over the world are highlighted.
Reliable and efficient
research basis
Statista has been the market leader in
providing business data for 13 years.
Companies, universities, schools and
the media trust our service.
CLICK HERE TO DISCOVER OUR ACCOUNTS
AND FIND DATA FOR YOUR BUSINESS COSMOS
Statista – a universe of data
103. Extensive
Datasets
We provide data on every mobile
operator in every country
worldwide, with over 30 million
data points, updated daily.
Annually, GSMA Intelligence
publishes over 100 reports and
exclusive analyses, adding greater
insight into our data and
supporting our customers in
making stronger business choices.
Our forecasting experts provide a
five-year (and beyond) view into the
future, enabling long-term investment
planning. Updated quarterly, our
forecasts are consistently accurate
within +/- 2.5 % of reported data.
Topical and
Timely
Research
Pinpoint
Accuracy
We serve a wide array of industries in the
mobile ecosystem and beyond, including
most of the world’s mobile operators plus
major vendors, regulators, international
institutions and vertical sectors ranging
from automotive to retail.
Industry
Trusted
3 Global
Offices
Delhi Barcelona London
Serves over
800
organisations
40,000
users worldwide
Definitive data and analysis
for the mobile industry
104. Semrush .Trends
Data. Insights. Impact.
Semrush .Trends provides instant market overview
and competitive digital insights for those who are
looking to grow their business.
It enables an in-depth view of market conditions
and trends for creating a growth-driven marketing
strategy.
All-encompassing insights for any
website, industry or market across
190 countries & regions
A single solution with 50+ tools
for your strategic vision
Accurate data for real-time market
and competitive insights
105.
106. Similarweb
provides insights
for any website,
app, industry and
market
Websites
100M+
Apps
4.7M+
Countries
190+
Industries
210+
Search Terms
1B+
E-commerce
product SKUs
250M+
107.
108. Prior to our Digital 2021 reports, we included data
sourced from social media platforms’ self-service
advertising tools in our calculations of internet user
numbers, but we no longer include this data in our
internet user figures. This is because the user numbers
reported by social media platforms are typically based
on active user accounts, and may not represent unique
individuals. For example, one person may maintain
more than one active presence (account) on the same
social media platform. Similarly, some accounts may
represent ‘non-human’ entities, including: pets and
animals; historical figures; businesses, causes, groups,
and organisations; places of interest; etc.
As a result, the figures we report for social media users
may exceed internet user numbers. However, while this
may seem counter-intuitive or surprising, such instances
do not represent errors in the data or in our reporting.
Rather, these differences may indicate delays in the
reporting of internet user numbers, or they may indicate
higher instances of individuals managing multiple
social media accounts, or ‘non-human’ social media
accounts.
If you have any questions about specific data
points in these reports, or if you’d like to offer your
organisation’s data for consideration in future reports,
please email our reports team: reports@kepios.com.
footnotes of each relevant chart, but please use caution
when comparing data from different reports, because
changes to research samples, base data, research
methodologies, and approaches to reporting may
mean that values are not comparable.
Furthermore, due to the differing data collection and
treatment methodologies, and the different periods
during which data have been collected, there may be
significant differences in the reported metrics for similar
data points throughout this report. For example, data
from surveys often varies over time, even if that data
has been collected by the same organisation using the
same approach in each wave of their research.
In particular, reports of internet user numbers vary
considerably between different sources and over time.
In part, this is because there are significant challenges
associated with collecting, analysing, and publishing
internet user data on a regular basis, not least because
research into public internet use necessitates the use of
face-to-face surveys. Different organisations may also
adopt different approaches to sampling the population
for research into internet use, and variations in areas
such as the age range of the survey population, or the
balance between urban and rural respondents, may
play an important role in determining eventual findings.
Note that COVID-19 has limited internet user research.
Note: This page is a summary of our comprehensive
notes on data variance, potential mismatches,
and curiosities, which you can read in full at
https://datareportal.com/notes-on-data.
This report features data from a wide variety of
different sources, including market research agencies,
internet and social media companies, governments,
public bodies, news media, and private individuals, as
well as extrapolations and analysis of that data.
Wherever possible, we’ve prioritised data sources
that provide broader geographical coverage, in
order to minimise potential variations between data
points, and to offer more reliable comparison across
countries. However, where we believe that standalone
metrics provide a more reliable reference, we use such
standalone numbers to ensure more accurate reporting.
Please note that some data points may only be
available for a limited selection of countries, so we
may not be able to report the same data in all reports.
From time to time, we may also change the source(s)
that we use to inform specific data points. As a result,
some figures may appear to change in unexpected
ways from one report to another. Wherever we’re
aware of these changes, we include details in the
NOTES ON DATA VARIANCE, MISMATCHES, AND CURIOSITIES
109. anyone else for any direct, indirect, punitive,
incidental, special, consequential, exemplary
or similar loss or damage, or loss or damage
of any kind, suffered by you or anyone else as
a result of any use, action or decision taken by
you or anyone else in any way connected to
this report or the information contained herein,
or the result(s) thereof, even if advised of the
possibility of such loss or damage.
This report may contain reference to third-
party data providers, however this report
does not endorse any such third parties or
their products or services, nor is this report
sponsored by, endorsed by or associated with
such third parties.
Except for those portions of this report relating
to the perspectives of We Are Social, this
report and any opinions contained herein
have been prepared by Kepios, and have not
been specifically approved or disapproved
by We Are Social. This report is subject to
change without notice. To ensure you have the
most recent version of this report, please visit
our website at https://datareportal.com/.
This report contains data, tables, figures,
maps, flags, analyses and technical notes
that relate to various geographical territories
around the world, however reference to
these territories and any associated elements
(including names and flags) does not imply
the expression of any opinion whatsoever
on the part of Kepios, We Are Social, or
any of the featured brands, nor any of those
organisations’ partners, affiliates, employees
or agents, concerning the legal status of
any country, territory, city or area or of its
authorities, or concerning the delimitation of
its frontiers or boundaries.
This report is provided with the understanding
that it does not constitute professional
advice or services of any kind and
should therefore not be substituted for
independent investigations, thought or
judgment. Accordingly, neither Kepios, nor
We Are Social, nor any of the brands and
organisations featured or cited herein, nor any
of their partners, affiliates, group companies,
employees or agents shall, to the fullest
extent permitted by law, be liable to you or
This report has been compiled by Kepios Pte.
Ltd. (“Kepios”) on behalf of We Are Social
Ltd. (“We Are Social”) for informational
purposes only, and relies on data from a wide
variety of sources, including but not limited
to public and private companies, market
research firms, government agencies, NGOs,
and private individuals.
While Kepios and We Are Social strive to
ensure that all data and charts contained in
this report are, as at the time of publishing,
accurate and up-to-date, neither Kepios, nor
We Are Social, nor any of the other featured
brands and organisations shall be responsible
for any errors or omissions contained in this
report, or for the results obtained from its use.
All information contained in this report
is provided “as is”, with no guarantee
whatsoever of its accuracy, completeness,
correctness or non-infringement of third-
party rights and without warranty of any
kind, express or implied, including without
limitation, warranties of merchantability or
fitness for any particular purpose.
DISCLAIMER AND IMPORTANT NOTES