The document presents data on Facebook adoption and advertising reach worldwide, highlighting discrepancies between potential audience figures and actual monthly active users due to duplicates and account management behavior. It notes significant changes in audience reporting methodology by Meta, particularly following the conflict in Ukraine, which affected data availability for Russia. Key findings include substantial audience figures that may exceed actual population numbers, and the report emphasizes the importance of understanding data context when interpreting advertising reach metrics.

1. THE LATEST DATA FOR FACEBOOK ADOPTION AND USE AROUND THE WORLD
FACEBOOK Q2 2022

3. GLOBAL HEADLINES AND BENCHMARKS
HEADLINES FOR WORLD REGIONS
DATA FOR UN GEOSCHEME REGIONS
LOCAL DATA BY COUNTRY
FURTHER INFORMATION
REPORT CONTENTS

4. The “potential audience” figures shown in this report use data published in Meta’s advertising resources, and represent Facebook’s potential
advertising reach. Meta‘s tools publish audience data as a range (e.g. 25,000–30,000), and we use the mid-point of these published
ranges as the basis for our reporting. However, for various reasons, please note that these advertising audience reach figures may not match
Facebook’s monthly active user figures, and should not be treated as such. For example, individual user behaviours and legal restrictions
may mean that some active users are not shown any advertising on the platform during a particular reporting period. Conversely, audience
figures may not represent unique individuals. This is because some people may manage multiple accounts on the same platform,
and because some accounts may represent “non-human” entities such as businesses, pets, groups and organisations, buildings, locations,
and more, regardless of platform rules governing such accounts. Furthermore, despite their best efforts, it’s unlikely that platforms will be
able to remove all “fake” accounts from their audience figures. As a result, it’s not uncommon for platforms’ advertising audience figures
to exceed figures for total population, for population by age, or for internet users. So, while it may seem surprising to see audience figures
that exceed the total eligible population or internet user base, these audience figures are not necessarily incorrect, and we’ve chosen to
publish them as they’re reported in the platform’s own tools, to enable readers to make their own inferences and judgments. Please also
note that changes in audience figures over time may be the result of corrections in Meta’s source data due to methodology revisions or the
removal of duplicate, fake, or ineligible accounts, and such changes may not necessarily represent a change in genuine user numbers.
IMPORTANT NOTES
!

5. !
Due to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, Meta’s advertising resources have not published any audience data for the Russian Federation
since February 2022, which may impact various figures across the company’s platforms. For reference, in January 2022, Meta’s
tools reported that Facebook ads reached 8.6 million users in Russia, while Instagram ads reached 63.0 million users in the country.
However, due to Meta’s revised reporting, we are currently unable to include any figures for Russia in the ad audience data that
we report for Facebook, Instagram, or Messenger. This has also had a negative impact on the global figures that we report for
each of these platforms. Furthermore, in Q4 2021, Meta made some important changes to how its self-service tools report the
potential advertising reach of its platforms, including a move to publishing audience figures as a range instead of as an absolute
number. Our analysis suggests that Meta also revised its base data at this time, resulting in some important corrections to published
audience figures for Facebook and Messenger. As a result, we are currently unable to provide any figures for year-on-year
changes in these platforms’ audiences, and we advise readers not to compare the advertising audience figures for Facebook
and Messenger contained within this report with figures published for those platforms in previous reports. For more information,
please read our complete notes on data variance, potential mismatches, and curiosities: https://datareportal.com/notes-on-data.
IMPORTANT NOTES ON META’S AD REACH REPORTING

6. ESSENTIAL DATA FOR DIGITAL ADOPTION AND USE IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD
DIGITAL 2022
LOCAL COUNTRY HEADLINES REPORT
THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO THE WORLD’S CONNECTED BEHAVIOURS
GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT
DIGITAL 2022
CLICK HERE TO READ OUR DIGITAL 2022
LOCAL COUNTRY HEADLINES REPORT, WITH
ESSENTIAL STATS FOR DIGITAL ADOPTION
IN EVERY COUNTRY AROUND THE WORLD
CLICK HERE TO READ OUR FLAGSHIP DIGITAL
2022 GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT, PACKED
WITH ALL THE NUMBERS YOU NEED TO MAKE
SENSE OF THE CURRENT STATE OF DIGITAL
EXPLORE OUR COMPLETE COLLECTION OF DIGITAL 2022 GLOBAL DATA

7. DATAREPORTAL.COM/LIBRARY
FIND THOUSANDS OF REPORTS EXPLORING DIGITAL TRENDS IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD IN OUR FREE ONLINE LIBRARY:

8. GLOBAL HEADLINES

9. 9
58.7% 47.4% 66.8% 72.9%
2.94 37.0% +0.8% +2.9%
BILLION +24 MILLION +83 MILLION
90
TOTAL FACEBOOK MAU
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
TOTAL FACEBOOK MAU
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FACEBOOK DAILY ACTIVE USERS
vs. MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS
FACEBOOK ADVERTISING REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK MAU
TOTAL MONTHLY ACTIVE
FACEBOOK USERS (MAU)
TOTAL FACEBOOK MAU
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN TOTAL FACEBOOK MAU
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN TOTAL FACEBOOK MAU
SOURCES: META’S INVESTOR EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADVERTISING RESOURCES. NOTES: GENDER DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS, AND ARE BASED ON EACH
GENDER’S SHARE OF FACEBOOK’S ADVERTISING AUDIENCE. COMPARABILITY: USER FIGURES SHOWN ON THIS CHART REPRESENT MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS, AND ARE DIFFERENT TO THE FACEBOOK
ADVERTISING AUDIENCE FIGURES SHOWN ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR MORE DETAILS ON WHY ADVERTISING REACH DOES NOT EQUATE TO TOTAL MAU FIGURE.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
FACEBOOK’S TOTAL MONTHLY ACTIVE USER BASE, BASED ON DATA PUBLISHED IN THE COMPANY’S INVESTOR EARNINGS REPORTS
FACEBOOK: MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS
APR
2022

10. 10
2,603 2,701 2,740 2,797 2,853 2,895 2,910 2,912 2,936
+3.8% +1.4% +2.1% +2.0% +1.5% +0.5% +0.1% +0.8%
APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR
2020 2020 2020 2021 2021 2021 2021 2022 2022
SOURCE: META’S INVESTOR EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
MONTHLY ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS (IN BILLIONS), WITH RELATIVE GROWTH RATES OVER TIME
FACEBOOK MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS
APR
2022
DATAREPORTAL

11. 11
42.8% 34.6% 43.2% 56.8%
2.14 27.0% +1.5% [N/A]
BILLION +32 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK: GLOBAL ADVERTISING AUDIENCE
APR
2022

12. 12
2.02 2.09 2.14 2.18 2.21 2.25 2.28
2.11 2.14
+3.3% +2.2% +2.2% +1.2% +1.8% +1.1% [N/A] +1.5%
APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR
2020 2020 2020 2021 2021 2021 2021 2022 2022
SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER
BASE. NOTE: STARTING FROM JAN 2022, FIGURES USE THE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES; FIGURES FOR ALL DATES PRIOR TO DEC 2021 ARE AS PUBLISHED IN META’S TOOLS. COMPARABILITY: META
SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES FOR DATES AFTER JAN 2022 ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES FOR DATES PRIOR TO DEC 2021,
OR WITH DATA PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS. IN ADDITION TO CHANGES IN ACTIVE USER NUMBERS, FIGURES FOR GROWTH RATE OVER TIME MAY BE IMPACTED BY REVISIONS TO BASE DATA.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
TOTAL POTENTIAL AUDIENCE REACH OF ADS ON FACEBOOK (IN BILLIONS OF USERS), WITH RELATIVE GROWTH RATES OVER TIME
FACEBOOK ADVERTISING REACH
APR
2022
SIGNIFICANT
BASE
DATA
REVISIONS
DATAREPORTAL

13. 13
2.4%
9.2%
12.2%
8.1%
5.2%
3.5%
2.8%
3.2%
13.2%
17.8%
10.6%
5.9%
3.3%
2.5%
13 – 17
YEARS OLD
18 – 24
YEARS OLD
25 – 34
YEARS OLD
35 – 44
YEARS OLD
45 – 54
YEARS OLD
55 – 64
YEARS OLD
65+
YEARS OLD
FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE
SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE.
NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE”. COMPARABILITY: META HAS SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS
BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH THOSE PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
SHARE OF FACEBOOK’S ADVERTISING AUDIENCE BY AGE GROUP AND GENDER
FACEBOOK: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE PROFILE
APR
2022
DATAREPORTAL

14. 14
11 PAKISTAN 44,850,000 28.2%
12 COLOMBIA 35,850,000 85.6%
13 U.K. 35,450,000 61.1%
14 TURKEY 34,400,000 50.4%
15 FRANCE 31,450,000 56.4%
16 ITALY 28,950,000 53.8%
17 ARGENTINA 28,600,000 78.8%
18 NIGERIA 27,750,000 20.9%
19 GERMANY 25,600,000 34.8%
20 PERU 24,950,000 94.3%
01 INDIA 339,750,000 31.0%
02 U.S.A. 180,100,000 63.8%
03 INDONESIA 130,900,000 60.4%
04 BRAZIL 116,550,000 65.7%
05 MEXICO 91,400,000 89.0%
06 PHILIPPINES 86,600,000 103.3%*
07 VIETNAM 70,650,000 89.6%
08 THAILAND 51,150,000 84.6%
09 BANGLADESH 47,450,000 36.5%
10 EGYPT 45,600,000 61.8%
# LOCATION
TOTAL
REACH
REACH vs.
POP. 13+
# LOCATION
TOTAL
REACH
REACH vs.
POP. 13+
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; U.N.; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE
TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. *NOTES: “REACH vs. POP. 13+” VALUES SHOULD NOT TECHNICALLY EXCEED 100%, BUT DATA ARE SHOWN “AS IS”, TO ENABLE READERS TO MAKE THEIR OWN JUDGMENTS. ONLY
INCLUDES COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES WITH POPULATIONS OF AT LEAST 50,000 PEOPLE. FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. COMPARABILITY: META HAS SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA
AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH THOSE PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES WITH THE LARGEST FACEBOOK ADVERTISING AUDIENCES
FACEBOOK AD REACH RANKING
APR
2022

15. 15
11 VIETNAM 89.6% 70,650,000
12 MEXICO 89.0% 91,400,000
13 ARUBA 88.0% 80,750
14 QATAR 86.0% 2,250,000
15 GEORGIA 85.7% 2,800,000
16 ICELAND 85.7% 247,700
17 COLOMBIA 85.6% 35,850,000
18 BOLIVIA 85.4% 7,600,000
19 GREENLAND 85.1% 39,800
20 THAILAND 84.6% 51,150,000
01 MONGOLIA 107.0%* 2,600,000
02 PHILIPPINES 103.3%* 86,600,000
03 LIBYA 103.3%* 5,550,000
04 CAMBODIA 95.5% 12,000,000
05 MALTA 95.3% 369,350
06 PERU 94.3% 24,950,000
07 ECUADOR 93.0% 12,850,000
08 TONGA 91.3% 69,100
09 U.A.E. 90.9% 7,950,000
10 SAMOA 89.7% 122,750
# LOCATION
REACH vs.
POP. 13+
TOTAL
REACH
# LOCATION
REACH vs.
POP. 13+
TOTAL
REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; U.N.; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE
TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. *NOTES: “REACH vs. POP. 13+” VALUES SHOULD NOT TECHNICALLY EXCEED 100%, BUT DATA ARE SHOWN “AS IS”, TO ENABLE READERS TO MAKE THEIR OWN JUDGMENTS. ONLY
INCLUDES COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES WITH POPULATIONS OF AT LEAST 50,000 PEOPLE. FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. COMPARABILITY: META HAS SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA
AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH THOSE PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES WHERE FACEBOOK ADS REACH THE GREATEST SHARE OF THE POPULATION AGED 13+
FACEBOOK ELIGIBLE AD REACH RATE RANKING
APR
2022

16. 16
43.0% 57.0% 48.9% 51.1% 44.8% 55.2% 49.8% 50.2% 34.7% 65.3%
1.16 663.1 564.6 493.9 125.0
BILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE
POTENTIAL AUDIENCE
THAT MARKETERS CAN
REACH WITH ADS IN
FACEBOOK STORIES
POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT
MARKETERS CAN REACH
WITH ADS IN FACEBOOK
SEARCH RESULTS
POTENTIAL AUDIENCE
THAT MARKETERS CAN
REACH WITH ADS IN
FACEBOOK MARKETPLACE
POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT
MARKETERS CAN REACH
WITH ADS IN FACEBOOK
INSTANT ARTICLES
POTENTIAL AUDIENCE
THAT MARKETERS CAN
REACH WITH ADS IN
FACEBOOK REELS
SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE.
NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES.
SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE.
NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH DIFFERENT KINDS OF AD PLACEMENT ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD AUDIENCE BY PLACEMENT TYPE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH DIFFERENT KINDS OF AD PLACEMENT ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD AUDIENCE BY PLACEMENT TYPE
APR
2022

17. 17
1.68 31.0% 17.0% 50.5% 1.5%
AVERAGE NUMBER OF
PAGE POSTS PER DAY
PHOTO POSTS’ SHARE
OF TOTAL PAGE POSTS
VIDEO POSTS’ SHARE
OF TOTAL PAGE POSTS
LINK POSTS’ SHARE
OF TOTAL PAGE POSTS
STATUS POSTS’ SHARE
OF TOTAL PAGE POSTS
SOURCE: LOCOWISE. FIGURES REPRESENT AVERAGES BETWEEN 01 DECEMBER 2021 AND 28 FEBRUARY 2022. NOTES: FIGURES ARE AVERAGES BASED ON A WIDE VARIETY OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF PAGE, WITH
DIFFERENT AUDIENCE SIZES, IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD. VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
POSTS OF EACH TYPE AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL POSTS MADE BY FACEBOOK PAGES
SHARE OF FACEBOOK PAGE POSTS BY POST TYPE
APR
2022

18. 18
0.06% 0.10% 0.07% 0.03% 0.10%
AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE
POST ENGAGEMENTS vs.
PAGE FANS: ALL POST TYPES
AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE
POST ENGAGEMENTS vs.
PAGE FANS: PHOTO POSTS
AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE
POST ENGAGEMENTS vs.
PAGE FANS: VIDEO POSTS
AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE
POST ENGAGEMENTS vs.
PAGE FANS: LINK POSTS
AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE
POST ENGAGEMENTS vs.
PAGE FANS: STATUS POSTS
SOURCE: LOCOWISE. FIGURES REPRESENT AVERAGES BETWEEN 01 DECEMBER 2021 AND 28 FEBRUARY 2022. NOTES: PERCENTAGES COMPARE THE COMBINED TOTAL OF REACTIONS, COMMENTS, AND
SHARES WITH THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE FANS. FIGURES ARE AVERAGES BASED ON A WIDE VARIETY OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF PAGE, WITH DIFFERENT AUDIENCE SIZES, IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES AROUND THE
WORLD. VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
FACEBOOK PAGE POST ENGAGEMENTS (REACTIONS, COMMENTS, AND SHARES) AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PAGE FANS
FACEBOOK POST ENGAGEMENT BENCHMARKS
APR
2022

19. 19
0.27% 0.18% 0.04%
AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST
ENGAGEMENT RATE: PAGES
WITH FEWER THAN 10,000 FANS
AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST
ENGAGEMENT RATE: PAGES
WITH 10,000 TO 100,000 FANS
AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST
ENGAGEMENT RATE: PAGES
WITH MORE THAN 100,000 FANS
SOURCE: LOCOWISE. FIGURES REPRESENT AVERAGES BETWEEN 01 DECEMBER 2021 AND 28 FEBRUARY 2022. NOTES: PERCENTAGES COMPARE THE COMBINED TOTAL OF REACTIONS, COMMENTS, AND
SHARES WITH THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE FANS. FIGURES ARE AVERAGES BASED ON A WIDE VARIETY OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF PAGE, WITH DIFFERENT AUDIENCE SIZES, IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES AROUND THE
WORLD. VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
FACEBOOK PAGE POST ENGAGEMENTS (REACTIONS, COMMENTS, AND SHARES) AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PAGE FANS
FACEBOOK POST ENGAGEMENT COMPARISONS
APR
2022

20. GLOBAL REGIONS

21. 21
43.4% 26.8% 40.4% 59.6%
242.2 17.3% +4.5% [N/A]
MILLION +10 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
AFRICA
APR
2022

22. 22
69.9% 69.8% 52.6% 47.4%
590.3 56.9% +0.9% [N/A]
MILLION +5.4 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE AMERICAS
APR
2022

23. 23
35.4% 26.5% 36.7% 63.3%
933.5 21.3% +2.2% [N/A]
MILLION +21 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ASIA-PACIFIC
APR
2022

24. 24
41.0% 42.7% 50.2% 49.8%
311.1 36.5% -2.0% [N/A]
MILLION -6.3 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
EUROPE
APR
2022

25. 25
32.3% 31.8% 30.1% 69.9%
64.23 23.9% +3.3% [N/A]
MILLION +2.1 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE MIDDLE EAST
APR
2022

26. UN GEOSCHEME REGIONS

27. 27
58.4% 63.8% 54.5% 45.5%
201.3 54.0% +0.3% [N/A]
MILLION +650 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NORTHERN AMERICA
APR
2022

28. 28
91.5% 83.3% 51.2% 48.8%
117.9 64.4% +2.1% [N/A]
MILLION +2.5 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CENTRAL AMERICA
APR
2022

29. 29
43.4% 36.8% 50.4% 49.6%
12.91 29.4% +1.7% [N/A]
MILLION +216 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE CARIBBEAN
APR
2022

30. 30
75.7% 73.1% 51.9% 48.1%
258.2 59.1% +0.8% [N/A]
MILLION +2.1 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SOUTHERN AMERICA
APR
2022

31. 31
42.8% 46.3% 51.5% 48.5%
78.88 40.1% +0.07% [N/A]
MILLION +52 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
WESTERN EUROPE
APR
2022

32. 32
54.6% 62.6% 53.5% 46.5%
56.96 53.2% +0.7% [N/A]
MILLION +420 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NORTHERN EUROPE
APR
2022

33. 33
53.4% 52.6% 50.4% 49.6%
71.50 46.6% +1.1% [N/A]
MILLION +773 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SOUTHERN EUROPE
APR
2022

34. 34
24.9% 25.2% 54.4% 45.6%
62.59 21.4% -11.0% [N/A]
MILLION -7.7 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
EASTERN EUROPE
APR
2022

35. 35
62.6% 56.3% 38.8% 61.2%
101.9 40.1% +3.0% [N/A]
MILLION +2.9 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NORTHERN AFRICA
APR
2022

36. 36
31.9% 21.9% 38.3% 61.7%
57.28 13.6% +6.4% [N/A]
MILLION +3.4 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
WESTERN AFRICA
APR
2022

37. 37
29.7% 12.3% 39.3% 60.7%
14.03 7.4% +6.9% [N/A]
MILLION +905 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MIDDLE AFRICA
APR
2022

38. 38
34.1% 14.0% 40.7% 59.3%
41.52 8.9% +6.4% [N/A]
MILLION +2.5 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
EASTERN AFRICA
APR
2022

39. 39
58.8% 53.4% 50.8% 49.2%
27.51 39.9% +2.5% [N/A]
MILLION +676 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SOUTHERN AFRICA
APR
2022

40. 40
49.8% 48.4% 32.6% 67.4%
105.4 36.7% +2.2% [N/A]
MILLION +2.3 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
WESTERN ASIA
APR
2022

41. 41
10.5% 9.5% 42.4% 57.6%
5.32 7.0% +4.6% [N/A]
MILLION +234 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CENTRAL ASIA
APR
2022

42. 42
50.7% 30.0% 24.7% 75.3%
456.8 23.1% +3.4% [N/A]
MILLION +15 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SOUTHERN ASIA
APR
2022

43. 43
80.6% 74.8% 48.3% 51.7%
399.6 58.8% +1.3% [N/A]
MILLION +5.1 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SOUTHEASTERN ASIA
APR
2022

44. 44
4.1% 3.5% 47.1% 52.9%
50.83 3.0% -0.2% [N/A]
MILLION -94 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
EASTERN ASIA
APR
2022

45. 45
65.4% 60.5% 52.2% 47.8%
21.00 48.1% +1.4% [N/A]
MILLION +285 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
OCEANIA
APR
2022

46. LOCAL MARKET DATA

47. 47
45.6% [N/A] 56.9% 43.1%
68.2 27.7% +14.1% [N/A]
THOUSAND +8,400 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ABKHAZIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ABKHAZIA
APR
2022

48. 48
40.4% 14.5% 16.7% 83.3%
3.80 9.4% +2.7% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
AFGHANISTAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
AFGHANISTAN
APR
2022

49. 49
135.3% [N/A] 52.8% 47.2%
18.2 60.4% -0.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND -50 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ISLANDS
THE ÅLAND
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE ÅLAND ISLANDS
APR
2022

50. 50
52.3% 49.1% 37.8% 62.2%
1.20 41.8% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ALBANIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ALBANIA
APR
2022

51. 51
82.0% 71.0% 40.4% 59.6%
23.30 51.6% +3.8% [N/A]
MILLION +850 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ALGERIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ALGERIA
APR
2022

52. 52
123.6% 70.2% 53.5% 46.5%
29.8 54.1% +4.9% [N/A]
THOUSAND +1,400 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SAMOA
AMERICAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
AMERICAN SAMOA
APR
2022

53. 53
52.4% 53.7% 52.2% 47.8%
37.2 48.0% +7.8% [N/A]
THOUSAND +2,700 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ANDORRA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ANDORRA
APR
2022

54. 54
20.8% 12.6% 42.3% 57.7%
2.60 7.5% +8.3% [N/A]
MILLION +200 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ANGOLA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ANGOLA
APR
2022

55. 55
72.2% 72.2% 52.8% 47.2%
8,950 58.9% 0% [N/A]
[UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ANGUILLA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ANGUILLA
APR
2022

56. 56
73.5% 68.9% 52.8% 47.2%
55.5 55.9% +1.7% [N/A]
THOUSAND +950 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BARBUDA
ANTIGUA &
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ANTIGUA & BARBUDA
APR
2022

57. 57
72.9% 78.8% 53.2% 46.8%
28.60 62.3% +0.7% [N/A]
MILLION +200 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ARGENTINA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ARGENTINA
APR
2022

58. 58
66.0% 61.6% 52.1% 47.9%
1.50 50.5% +7.1% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ARMENIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ARMENIA
APR
2022

59. 59
77.3% 88.0% 53.2% 46.8%
80.8 75.1% +0.2% [N/A]
THOUSAND +200 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ARUBA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ARUBA
APR
2022

60. 60
64.5% 70.4% 53.0% 47.0%
15.25 58.7% +1.7% [N/A]
MILLION +250 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
AUSTRALIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
AUSTRALIA
APR
2022

61. 61
39.2% 41.7% 51.5% 48.5%
3.30 36.4% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
AUSTRIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
AUSTRIA
APR
2022

62. 62
18.4% 19.6% 31.8% 68.2%
1.60 15.6% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
AZERBAIJAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
AZERBAIJAN
APR
2022

63. 63
60.7% 64.2% 54.0% 46.0%
210.9 52.8% +0.9% [N/A]
THOUSAND +1,850 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BAHAMAS
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE BAHAMAS
APR
2022

64. 64
41.8% 49.2% 26.8% 73.2%
734.9 41.4% +3.0% [N/A]
THOUSAND +21 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BAHRAIN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BAHRAIN
APR
2022

65. 65
88.2% 36.5% 32.4% 67.6%
47.45 28.3% +6.2% [N/A]
MILLION +2.8 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BANGLADESH
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BANGLADESH
APR
2022

66. 66
60.7% 57.7% 53.9% 46.1%
143.0 49.7% -0.7% [N/A]
THOUSAND -950 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BARBADOS
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BARBADOS
APR
2022

67. 67
9.3% 9.3% 61.2% 38.8%
744.5 7.9% +5.4% [N/A]
THOUSAND +38 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BELARUS
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BELARUS
APR
2022

68. 68
59.3% 65.2% 51.5% 48.5%
6.50 55.7% +1.6% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BELGIUM
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BELGIUM
APR
2022

69. 69
110.1% 74.3% 50.9% 49.1%
229.5 55.9% +0.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND +650 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BELIZE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BELIZE
APR
2022

70. 70
39.4% 18.1% 34.9% 65.1%
1.45 11.4% +11.5% [N/A]
MILLION +150 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BENIN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BENIN
APR
2022

71. 71
53.1% 61.0% 56.6% 43.4%
32.4 52.3% +0.5% [N/A]
THOUSAND +150 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BERMUDA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BERMUDA
APR
2022

72. 72
116.8% 78.9% 48.0% 52.0%
491.0 62.5% +3.2% [N/A]
THOUSAND +15 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BHUTAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BHUTAN
APR
2022

73. 73
106.1% 85.4% 47.7% 52.3%
7.60 63.6% -0.7% [N/A]
MILLION -50 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BOLIVIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BOLIVIA
APR
2022

74. 74
83.9% [N/A] 51.2% 48.8%
18.3 68.8% +3.1% [N/A]
THOUSAND +550 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
EUSTATIUS & SABA
BONAIRE, SINT
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BONAIRE, SINT EUSTATIUS & SABA
APR
2022

75. 75
57.9% 50.5% 48.9% 51.1%
1.45 44.6% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
HERZEGOVINA
BOSNIA &
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA
APR
2022

76. 76
70.7% 63.4% 49.9% 50.1%
1.10 45.3% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BOTSWANA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BOTSWANA
APR
2022

77. 77
66.6% 65.7% 53.4% 46.6%
116.6 54.2% +0.5% [N/A]
MILLION +550 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BRAZIL
O R D E M E P R O G R E S
S
O
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BRAZIL
APR
2022

78. 78
87.0% 79.0% 51.1% 48.9%
20.7 67.6% +0.5% [N/A]
THOUSAND +100 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
THE BRITISH
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS
APR
2022

79. 79
69.5% 81.4% 43.0% 57.0%
293.3 66.0% -1.8% [N/A]
THOUSAND -5,300 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DARUSSALAM
BRUNEI
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BRUNEI DARUSSALAM
APR
2022

80. 80
68.2% 60.7% 51.4% 48.6%
3.65 53.2% +1.4% [N/A]
MILLION +50 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BULGARIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BULGARIA
APR
2022

81. 81
37.7% 17.1% 29.5% 70.5%
2.30 10.5% +12.2% [N/A]
MILLION +250 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
FASO
BURKINA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BURKINA FASO
APR
2022

82. 82
40.0% 10.0% 34.3% 65.7%
755.4 6.0% +3.4% [N/A]
THOUSAND +25 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
BURUNDI
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
BURUNDI
APR
2022

83. 83
78.5% 66.4% 48.9% 51.1%
286.8 50.6% +4.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND +12 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
VERDE
CABO
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CABO VERDE
APR
2022

84. 84
89.0% 95.5% 44.6% 55.4%
12.00 70.1% +3.4% [N/A]
MILLION +400 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
CAMBODIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CAMBODIA
APR
2022

85. 85
40.5% 24.2% 42.9% 57.1%
4.25 15.3% +3.7% [N/A]
MILLION +150 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
CAMEROON
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CAMEROON
APR
2022

86. 86
56.8% 63.7% 54.1% 45.9%
21.10 55.1% +1.0% [N/A]
MILLION +200 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
CANADA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CANADA
APR
2022

87. 87
84.0% 80.4% 51.8% 48.2%
45.7 68.1% +1.7% [N/A]
THOUSAND +750 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ISLANDS
THE CAYMAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE CAYMAN ISLANDS
APR
2022

88. 88
26.9% 4.5% 33.6% 66.4%
139.6 2.8% +6.4% [N/A]
THOUSAND +8,450 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
AFRICAN REPUBLIC
THE CENTRAL
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC
APR
2022

89. 89
17.6% 5.9% 21.4% 78.6%
604.4 3.5% +14.2% [N/A]
THOUSAND +75 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
CHAD
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CHAD
APR
2022

90. 90
71.2% 78.2% 52.2% 47.8%
12.60 65.5% +0.8% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
CHILE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CHILE
APR
2022

91. 91
0.1% 0.09% 41.1% 58.9%
1.10 0.08% +0.4% [N/A]
MILLION +4,900 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
CHINA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CHINA
APR
2022

92. 92
69.0% [N/A] 38.9% 61.1%
1,000 54.3% -13.0% [N/A]
-150 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ISLAND
CHRISTMAS
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CHRISTMAS ISLAND
APR
2022

93. 93
99.8% 85.6% 50.5% 49.5%
35.85 69.7% +2.0% [N/A]
MILLION +700 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
COLOMBIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
COLOMBIA
APR
2022

94. 94
270.6% 34.8% 40.5% 59.5%
207.7 23.0% +2.6% [N/A]
THOUSAND +5,350 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
COMOROS
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
COMOROS
APR
2022

95. 95
27.8% 8.4% 35.9% 64.1%
4.70 5.0% +10.6% [N/A]
MILLION +450 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO
THE DEMOCRATIC
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO
APR
2022

96. 96
55.4% 22.6% 41.7% 58.3%
834.2 14.5% +1.0% [N/A]
THOUSAND +8,400 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
OF THE CONGO
THE REPUBLIC
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO
APR
2022

97. 97
108.6% 69.8% 54.0% 46.0%
10.3 58.6% +2.0% [N/A]
THOUSAND +200 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ISLANDS
THE COOK
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE COOK ISLANDS
APR
2022

98. 98
80.6% 79.8% 51.5% 48.5%
3.40 65.7% +1.5% [N/A]
MILLION +50 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
RICA
COSTA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
COSTA RICA
APR
2022

99. 99
60.5% 34.6% 37.5% 62.5%
6.05 21.9% +7.1% [N/A]
MILLION +400 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
D’IVOIRE
CÔTE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CÔTE D’IVOIRE
APR
2022

100. 100
52.5% 49.1% 49.2% 50.8%
1.75 43.1% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
CROATIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CROATIA
APR
2022

101. 101
95.4% 76.6% 55.9% 44.1%
107.5 65.0% +2.1% [N/A]
THOUSAND +2,250 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
CURAÇAO
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CURAÇAO
APR
2022

102. 102
76.1% 80.6% 47.1% 52.9%
846.1 69.3% +1.9% [N/A]
THOUSAND +15 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
CYPRUS
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CYPRUS
APR
2022

103. 103
50.7% 52.8% 53.1% 46.9%
4.90 45.7% +1.0% [N/A]
MILLION +50 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
CZECHIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
CZECHIA
APR
2022

104. 104
62.4% 71.7% 52.1% 47.9%
3.60 61.8% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
DENMARK
APR
2022

105. 105
23.1% 18.1% 40.6% 59.4%
137.8 13.6% -9.6% [N/A]
THOUSAND -15 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DJIBOUTI
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
DJIBOUTI
APR
2022

106. 106
69.4% 59.2% 50.6% 49.4%
35.0 48.3% +1.5% [N/A]
THOUSAND +500 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DOMINICA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
DOMINICA
APR
2022

107. 107
65.3% 68.0% 49.6% 50.4%
5.75 52.1% +0.9% [N/A]
MILLION +50 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
REPUBLIC
THE DOMINICAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
APR
2022

108. 108
94.1% 93.0% 49.4% 50.6%
12.85 71.2% +1.2% [N/A]
MILLION +150 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ECUADOR
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ECUADOR
APR
2022

109. 109
60.0% 61.8% 37.0% 63.0%
45.60 43.1% +2.0% [N/A]
MILLION +900 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
EGYPT
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
EGYPT
APR
2022

110. 110
113.4% 79.9% 51.3% 48.8%
4.05 61.9% +2.5% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
EL SALVADOR
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
EL SALVADOR
APR
2022

111. 111
23.3% 9.1% 35.7% 64.3%
90.9 6.1% -0.5% [N/A]
THOUSAND -450 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GUINEA
EQUATORIAL
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
EQUATORIAL GUINEA
APR
2022

112. 112
2.9% 0.4% 29.4% 70.6%
8,500 0.2% +16.4% [N/A]
+1,200 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ERITREA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ERITREA
APR
2022

113. 113
57.4% 61.4% 55.6% 44.4%
698.2 52.8% +1.8% [N/A]
THOUSAND +13 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ESTONIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ESTONIA
APR
2022

114. 114
67.1% 46.0% 47.8% 52.2%
372.8 31.5% +0.8% [N/A]
THOUSAND +3,050 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ESWATINI
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ESWATINI
APR
2022

115. 115
23.5% 9.0% 34.0% 66.0%
7.05 5.9% +18.5% [N/A]
MILLION +1.1 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ETHIOPIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ETHIOPIA
APR
2022

116. 116
77.2% [N/A] 46.2% 53.8%
2,700 76.4% +3.8% [N/A]
+100 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ISLANDS (LAS MALVINAS)
THE FALKLAND
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE FALKLAND ISLANDS (LAS MALVINAS)
APR
2022

117. 117
73.7% 86.9% 50.0% 50.0%
35.4 71.9% +1.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND +450 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ISLANDS
THE FAROE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE FAROE ISLANDS
APR
2022

118. 118
83.7% 81.6% 49.1% 50.9%
554.8 61.1% -0.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND -1,550 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
FIJI
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
FIJI
APR
2022

119. 119
46.4% 51.8% 56.0% 44.0%
2.50 45.0% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
FINLAND
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
FINLAND
APR
2022

120. 120
51.6% 56.4% 52.3% 47.7%
31.45 48.0% +0.3% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
FRANCE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
FRANCE
APR
2022

121. 121
40.6% 39.8% 52.3% 47.7%
89.7 28.7% -4.7% [N/A]
THOUSAND -4,450 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GUIANA
FRENCH
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
FRENCH GUIANA
APR
2022

122. 122
89.2% 79.5% 54.3% 45.7%
184.1 64.9% +2.5% [N/A]
THOUSAND +4,550 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
POLYNESIA
FRENCH
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
FRENCH POLYNESIA
APR
2022

123. 123
51.5% 47.9% 43.5% 56.5%
739.8 31.9% +1.5% [N/A]
THOUSAND +11 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GABON
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GABON
APR
2022

124. 124
40.7% 24.3% 32.3% 67.7%
377.0 14.8% +2.4% [N/A]
THOUSAND +8,800 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THE GAMBIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE GAMBIA
APR
2022

125. 125
97.2% 85.7% 52.7% 47.3%
2.80 70.5% +3.7% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GEORGIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GEORGIA
APR
2022

126. 126
32.8% 34.8% 49.8% 50.2%
25.60 30.5% -0.6% [N/A]
MILLION -150 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GERMANY
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GERMANY
APR
2022

127. 127
39.1% 33.5% 39.0% 61.0%
7.30 22.7% +3.5% [N/A]
MILLION +250 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GHANA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GHANA
APR
2022

128. 128
69.1% 79.0% 52.1% 47.9%
22.0 65.3% 0% [N/A]
THOUSAND [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GIBRALTAR
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GIBRALTAR
APR
2022

129. 129
59.8% 55.5% 48.1% 51.9%
5.10 49.4% -1.0% [N/A]
MILLION -50 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GREECE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GREECE
APR
2022

130. 130
100.6% 85.1% 48.7% 51.3%
39.8 69.9% 0% [N/A]
THOUSAND [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GREENLAND
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GREENLAND
APR
2022

131. 131
95.6% 71.1% 51.0% 49.0%
64.0 56.5% +1.7% [N/A]
THOUSAND +1,100 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GRENADA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GRENADA
APR
2022

132. 132
64.7% 53.2% 52.6% 47.4%
181.1 45.3% +2.1% [N/A]
THOUSAND +3,650 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GUADELOUPE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GUADELOUPE
APR
2022

133. 133
80.5% 81.4% 50.9% 49.1%
111.0 64.8% +3.2% [N/A]
THOUSAND +3,400 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GUAM
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GUAM
APR
2022

134. 134
73.2% 66.4% 47.7% 52.3%
8.80 47.6% +4.1% [N/A]
MILLION +350 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GUATEMALA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GUATEMALA
APR
2022

135. 135
66.1% 66.0% 53.8% 46.2%
36.7 57.8% +0.8% [N/A]
THOUSAND +300 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GUERNSEY
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GUERNSEY
APR
2022

136. 136
64.2% 26.7% 43.5% 56.5%
2.30 16.7% +4.5% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GUINEA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GUINEA
APR
2022

137. 137
58.1% 21.0% 37.8% 62.2%
273.0 13.3% +0.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND +800 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GUINEA-BISSAU
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GUINEA-BISSAU
APR
2022

138. 138
130.5% 76.0% 52.3% 47.7%
458.6 57.8% +0.9% [N/A]
THOUSAND +4,150 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GUYANA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
GUYANA
APR
2022

139. 139
46.5% 27.3% 45.6% 54.4%
2.30 19.8% +7.0% [N/A]
MILLION +150 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
HAITI
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
HAITI
APR
2022

140. 140
79.4% 59.4% 51.7% 48.3%
4.50 44.2% +2.3% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
HONDURAS
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
HONDURAS
APR
2022

141. 141
63.0% 66.3% 55.7% 44.3%
4.45 58.6% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
KONG
HONG
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
HONG KONG
APR
2022

142. 142
66.6% 67.7% 53.5% 46.5%
5.70 59.3% +0.9% [N/A]
MILLION +50 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
HUNGARY
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
HUNGARY
APR
2022

143. 143
72.5% 85.7% 51.5% 48.5%
247.7 71.8% +0.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND +800 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ICELAND
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ICELAND
APR
2022

144. 144
51.5% 31.0% 23.5% 76.5%
339.8 24.2% +3.1% [N/A]
MILLION +10 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
INDIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
INDIA
APR
2022

145. 145
61.2% 60.4% 44.1% 55.9%
130.9 47.0% +0.8% [N/A]
MILLION +1.1 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
INDONESIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
INDONESIA
APR
2022

146. 146
76.5% 68.2% 26.9% 73.1%
19.25 45.9% +2.1% [N/A]
MILLION +400 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
IRAQ
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
IRAQ
APR
2022

147. 147
50.4% 60.3% 54.0% 46.0%
2.50 49.9% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
IRELAND
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
IRELAND
APR
2022

148. 148
77.7% 70.0% 52.9% 47.1%
51.6 60.2% +1.1% [N/A]
THOUSAND +550 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
OF MAN
THE ISLE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE ISLE OF MAN
APR
2022

149. 149
58.7% 69.8% 48.4% 51.6%
4.70 52.9% +1.1% [N/A]
MILLION +50 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ISRAEL
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ISRAEL
APR
2022

150. 150
56.8% 53.8% 49.9% 50.1%
28.95 48.0% +1.4% [N/A]
MILLION +400 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ITALY
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ITALY
APR
2022

151. 151
46.0% 39.2% 54.6% 45.4%
935.2 31.4% -0.05% [N/A]
THOUSAND -500 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
JAMAICA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
JAMAICA
APR
2022

152. 152
13.1% 13.8% 46.0% 54.0%
15.50 12.3% -0.3% [N/A]
MILLION -50 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
JAPAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
JAPAN
APR
2022

153. 153
57.4% 62.6% 53.9% 46.1%
57.6 53.4% +0.7% [N/A]
THOUSAND +400 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
JERSEY
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
JERSEY
APR
2022

154. 154
77.1% 70.6% 42.5% 57.5%
5.30 51.5% +1.0% [N/A]
MILLION +50 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
JORDAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
JORDAN
APR
2022

155. 155
14.6% 16.8% 51.1% 48.9%
2.40 12.5% +4.3% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
KAZAKHSTAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
KAZAKHSTAN
APR
2022

156. 156
45.6% 28.4% 43.1% 56.9%
10.70 19.1% +7.5% [N/A]
MILLION +750 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
KENYA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
KENYA
APR
2022

157. 157
113.3% 62.5% 50.7% 49.3%
52.9 43.0% +7.5% [N/A]
THOUSAND +3,700 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
KIRIBATI
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
KIRIBATI
APR
2022

158. 158
20.8% 22.7% 39.7% 60.3%
10.45 20.4% -1.9% [N/A]
MILLION -200 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
KOREA
SOUTH
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SOUTH KOREA
APR
2022

159. 159
50.9% 61.6% 39.0% 61.0%
876.6 49.4% +0.8% [N/A]
THOUSAND +7,350 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
KOSOVO
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
KOSOVO
APR
2022

160. 160
48.6% 58.5% 30.3% 69.7%
2.10 48.1% +2.4% [N/A]
MILLION +50 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
KUWAIT
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
KUWAIT
APR
2022

161. 161
22.6% 16.3% 46.9% 53.1%
778.3 11.6% +1.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND +9,650 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
KYRGYZSTAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
KYRGYZSTAN
APR
2022

162. 162
96.1% 68.1% 47.3% 52.7%
3.70 49.6% +5.7% [N/A]
MILLION +200 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
LAOS
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
LAOS
APR
2022

163. 163
51.5% 55.5% 56.4% 43.6%
879.0 47.4% +0.5% [N/A]
THOUSAND +4,750 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
LATVIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
LATVIA
APR
2022

164. 164
52.4% 59.4% 44.4% 55.6%
3.15 47.0% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
LEBANON
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
LEBANON
APR
2022

165. 165
63.1% 37.8% 53.9% 46.1%
589.5 27.1% +15.8% [N/A]
THOUSAND +80 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
LESOTHO
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
LESOTHO
APR
2022

166. 166
55.7% 21.9% 44.7% 55.3%
752.4 14.3% +6.0% [N/A]
THOUSAND +43 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
LIBERIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
LIBERIA
APR
2022

167. 167
156.3% 103.3% 39.3% 60.7%
5.55 79.1% +1.8% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
LIBYA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
LIBYA
APR
2022

168. 168
29.8% 34.0% 52.4% 47.6%
11.3 29.5% +1.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND +150 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
LIECHTENSTEIN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
LIECHTENSTEIN
APR
2022

169. 169
72.4% 74.1% 55.0% 45.0%
1.70 63.7% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
LITHUANIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
LITHUANIA
APR
2022

170. 170
49.5% 56.7% 50.1% 49.9%
313.8 49.0% +0.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND +800 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
LUXEMBOURG
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
LUXEMBOURG
APR
2022

171. 171
55.8% 56.7% 54.7% 45.3%
327.1 49.2% +0.5% [N/A]
THOUSAND +1,600 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MACAU
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MACAU
APR
2022

172. 172
47.9% 16.7% 45.2% 54.8%
3.15 10.9% +3.3% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MADAGASCAR
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MADAGASCAR
APR
2022

173. 173
20.2% 6.3% 34.5% 65.5%
800.0 4.0% +6.4% [N/A]
THOUSAND +48 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MALAWI
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MALAWI
APR
2022

174. 174
72.7% 81.6% 45.9% 54.1%
21.55 65.1% -0.7% [N/A]
MILLION -150 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MALAYSIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MALAYSIA
APR
2022

175. 175
92.9% 71.1% 37.8% 62.2%
318.1 58.7% +2.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND +7,150 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MALDIVES
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MALDIVES
APR
2022

176. 176
32.0% 16.4% 24.9% 75.1%
2.05 9.6% +7.9% [N/A]
MILLION +150 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MALI
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MALI
APR
2022

177. 177
94.6% 95.3% 46.9% 53.1%
369.4 83.2% +2.6% [N/A]
THOUSAND +9,500 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MALTA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MALTA
APR
2022

178. 178
91.0% 48.3% 51.4% 48.6%
21.1 35.2% +1.4% [N/A]
THOUSAND +300 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ISLANDS
THE MARSHALL
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE MARSHALL ISLANDS
APR
2022

179. 179
61.3% 45.9% 53.9% 46.1%
150.0 40.1% -1.9% [N/A]
THOUSAND -2,950 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MARTINIQUE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MARTINIQUE
APR
2022

180. 180
47.3% 29.6% 35.4% 64.6%
939.4 19.3% +5.2% [N/A]
THOUSAND +47 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MAURITANIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MAURITANIA
APR
2022

181. 181
96.6% 72.6% 46.9% 53.1%
799.0 62.7% +1.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND +10 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MAURITIUS
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MAURITIUS
APR
2022

182. 182
104.4% 37.0% 49.1% 50.9%
70.9 24.9% -9.6% [N/A]
THOUSAND -7,500 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MAYOTTE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MAYOTTE
APR
2022

183. 183
94.1% 89.0% 51.7% 48.3%
91.40 69.6% +1.9% [N/A]
MILLION +1.7 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MEXICO
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MEXICO
APR
2022

184. 184
97.8% 47.1% 53.9% 46.1%
40.5 34.5% -0.9% [N/A]
THOUSAND -350 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MICRONESIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA
APR
2022

185. 185
42.5% 37.4% 56.8% 43.2%
1.30 32.4% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MOLDOVA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MOLDOVA
APR
2022

186. 186
22.8% 24.1% 55.5% 44.5%
8,800 22.2% +9.3% [N/A]
+750 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MONACO
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MONACO
APR
2022

187. 187
119.3% 107.0% 52.9% 47.1%
2.60 77.2% +4.0% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MONGOLIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MONGOLIA
APR
2022

188. 188
55.3% 54.2% 46.4% 53.6%
288.1 45.9% -1.2% [N/A]
THOUSAND -3,500 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MONTENEGRO
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MONTENEGRO
APR
2022

189. 189
87.9% 56.0% 54.2% 45.8%
2,400 48.3% +4.3% [N/A]
+100 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MONTSERRAT
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MONTSERRAT
APR
2022

190. 190
62.5% 68.2% 38.4% 61.6%
19.80 52.6% +4.5% [N/A]
MILLION +850 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MOROCCO
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MOROCCO
APR
2022

191. 191
35.9% 14.1% 42.1% 57.9%
2.85 8.7% +1.8% [N/A]
MILLION +50 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MOZAMBIQUE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MOZAMBIQUE
APR
2022

192. 192
74.3% 43.3% 44.7% 55.3%
18.80 34.1% -2.3% [N/A]
MILLION -450 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MYANMAR
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
MYANMAR
APR
2022

193. 193
48.7% 36.6% 50.7% 49.3%
651.2 24.8% -1.2% [N/A]
THOUSAND -7,950 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
NAMIBIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NAMIBIA
APR
2022

194. 194
123.7% 105.3% 50.0% 50.0%
8,400 77.1% +1.8% [N/A]
+150 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
NAURU
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NAURU
APR
2022

195. 195
109.6% 55.9% 42.1% 57.9%
12.85 42.7% +4.5% [N/A]
MILLION +550 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
NEPAL
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NEPAL
APR
2022

196. 196
51.5% 57.0% 54.2% 45.8%
8.50 49.4% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
NETHERLANDS
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE NETHERLANDS
APR
2022

197. 197
70.9% 71.3% 53.3% 46.7%
168.8 58.2% +0.9% [N/A]
THOUSAND +1,550 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
NEW CALEDONIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NEW CALEDONIA
APR
2022

198. 198
65.9% 74.7% 53.3% 46.7%
3.05 62.4% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
NEW ZEALAND
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NEW ZEALAND
APR
2022

199. 199
117.8% 71.0% 48.6% 51.4%
3.60 53.3% +4.3% [N/A]
MILLION +150 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
NICARAGUA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NICARAGUA
APR
2022

200. 200
14.6% 3.9% 18.6% 81.4%
559.8 2.2% +8.5% [N/A]
THOUSAND +44 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
NIGER
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NIGER
APR
2022

201. 201
25.3% 20.9% 40.6% 59.4%
27.75 12.9% +6.3% [N/A]
MILLION +1.7 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
NIGERIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NIGERIA
APR
2022

202. 202
77.8% [N/A] 52.9% 47.1%
1,000 61.9% +11.1% [N/A]
+100 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
NIUE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NIUE
APR
2022

203. 203
86.2% [N/A] 53.8% 46.2%
750 42.9% -6.3% [N/A]
-50 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ISLAND
NORFOLK
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NORFOLK ISLAND
APR
2022

204. 204
55.0% 55.7% 44.4% 55.6%
996.3 47.9% +5.4% [N/A]
THOUSAND +51 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MACEDONIA
NORTH
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NORTH MACEDONIA
APR
2022

205. 205
172.4% 65.4% 52.2% 47.8%
30.7 52.8% -5.8% [N/A]
THOUSAND -1,900 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MARIANA ISLANDS
THE NORTHERN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS
APR
2022

206. 206
60.6% 70.3% 52.3% 47.7%
3.30 60.0% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
NORWAY
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
NORWAY
APR
2022

207. 207
25.8% 30.8% 22.5% 77.5%
1.30 24.5% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
OMAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
OMAN
APR
2022

208. 208
54.1% 28.2% 19.4% 80.6%
44.85 19.6% +3.0% [N/A]
MILLION +1.3 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
PAKISTAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
PAKISTAN
APR
2022

209. 209
160.8% 94.4% 47.8% 52.2%
14.7 80.4% +2.4% [N/A]
THOUSAND +350 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
PALAU
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
PALAU
APR
2022

210. 210
66.8% 74.5% 46.2% 53.8%
2.65 49.9% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
PALESTINE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
PALESTINE
APR
2022

211. 211
65.6% 56.9% 49.9% 50.1%
1.95 44.0% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
PANAMA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
PANAMA
APR
2022

212. 212
53.0% 15.8% 39.5% 60.5%
1.02 11.0% +1.9% [N/A]
MILLION +19 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
GUINEA
PAPUA NEW
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
PAPUA NEW GUINEA
APR
2022

213. 213
68.2% 67.4% 48.0% 52.0%
3.70 50.8% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
PARAGUAY
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
PARAGUAY
APR
2022

214. 214
113.7% 94.3% 47.4% 52.6%
24.95 74.2% +0.6% [N/A]
MILLION +150 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
PERU
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
PERU
APR
2022

215. 215
113.6% 103.3% 53.3% 46.7%
86.60 77.2% +3.3% [N/A]
MILLION +2.8 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
PHILIPPINES
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE PHILIPPINES
APR
2022

216. 216
55.0% 55.0% 52.9% 47.1%
18.05 47.8% +2.3% [N/A]
MILLION +400 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
POLAND
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
POLAND
APR
2022

217. 217
69.4% 66.3% 51.7% 48.3%
6.00 59.1% +0.8% [N/A]
MILLION +50 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
PORTUGAL
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
PORTUGAL
APR
2022

218. 218
69.2% 69.5% 54.5% 45.5%
1.75 61.9% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
RICO
PUERTO
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
PUERTO RICO
APR
2022

219. 219
76.6% 86.0% 24.8% 75.2%
2.25 75.8% +7.1% [N/A]
MILLION +150 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
QATAR
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
QATAR
APR
2022

220. 220
141.9% 74.2% 51.5% 48.5%
545.9 60.2% +3.8% [N/A]
THOUSAND +20 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
RÉUNION
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
RÉUNION
APR
2022

221. 221
59.6% 60.3% 50.3% 49.7%
10.00 52.5% +1.0% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ROMANIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ROMANIA
APR
2022

222. 222
16.9% 8.3% 35.5% 64.5%
733.1 5.4% +5.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND +37 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
RWANDA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
RWANDA
APR
2022

223. 223
187.5% 48.9% 48.2% 51.8%
4,250 42.8% -9.6% [N/A]
-450 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SAINT BARTHÉLEMY
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SAINT BARTHÉLEMY
APR
2022

224. 224
85.0% 36.5% 56.4% 43.6%
1,950 31.9% +5.4% [N/A]
+100 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
& TRISTAN DA CUNHA
SAINT HELENA, ASCENSION
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SAINT HELENA, ASCENSION & TRISTAN DA CUNHA
APR
2022

225. 225
74.5% 72.4% 53.5% 46.5%
32.4 60.1% +1.1% [N/A]
THOUSAND +350 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
& NEVIS
SAINT KITTS
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SAINT KITTS & NEVIS
APR
2022

226. 226
77.1% 58.3% 52.3% 47.7%
91.5 49.5% +1.6% [N/A]
THOUSAND +1,400 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
LUCIA
SAINT
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SAINT LUCIA
APR
2022

227. 227
171.6% 47.2% 53.0% 47.0%
14.5 36.6% +10.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND +1,350 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MARTIN
SAINT
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SAINT MARTIN
APR
2022

228. 228
92.8% 83.4% 53.0% 47.0%
4,250 73.8% +2.4% [N/A]
+100 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
& MIQUELON
SAINT PIERRE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SAINT PIERRE & MIQUELON
APR
2022

229. 229
99.4% 68.2% 52.4% 47.6%
62.1 55.7% -0.2% [N/A]
THOUSAND -100 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
& THE GRENADINES
SAINT VINCENT
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SAINT VINCENT & THE GRENADINES
APR
2022

230. 230
181.1% 89.7% 52.8% 47.2%
122.8 60.9% +1.7% [N/A]
THOUSAND +2,100 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SAMOA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SAMOA
APR
2022

231. 231
59.0% 40.5% 52.7% 47.3%
12.1 35.5% +13.6% [N/A]
THOUSAND +1,450 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SAN MARINO
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SAN MARINO
APR
2022

232. 232
89.5% 45.9% 45.8% 54.2%
66.9 29.5% +3.0% [N/A]
THOUSAND +1,950 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
& PRÍNCIPE
SÃO TOMÉ
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SÃO TOMÉ & PRÍNCIPE
APR
2022

233. 233
34.3% 42.7% 23.8% 76.3%
12.00 33.6% +5.3% [N/A]
MILLION +600 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ARABIA
SAUDI
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SAUDI ARABIA
APR
2022

234. 234
39.0% 28.6% 34.8% 65.2%
3.15 18.0% +6.8% [N/A]
MILLION +200 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SENEGAL
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SENEGAL
APR
2022

235. 235
41.2% 39.7% 50.0% 50.0%
3.00 34.6% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SERBIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SERBIA
APR
2022

236. 236
77.9% 77.5% 47.9% 52.1%
61.1 61.5% +3.0% [N/A]
THOUSAND +1,800 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SEYCHELLES
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE SEYCHELLES
APR
2022

237. 237
48.7% 17.2% 42.5% 57.5%
928.8 11.2% +9.8% [N/A]
THOUSAND +83 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
LEONE
SIERRA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SIERRA LEONE
APR
2022

238. 238
65.0% 67.0% 48.5% 51.5%
3.55 59.8% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SINGAPORE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SINGAPORE
APR
2022

239. 239
100.5% 85.5% 52.3% 47.7%
31.5 71.8% +1.0% [N/A]
THOUSAND +300 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
MAARTEN
SINT
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SINT MAARTEN
APR
2022

240. 240
52.9% 55.0% 52.9% 47.1%
2.60 47.6% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SLOVAKIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SLOVAKIA
APR
2022

241. 241
53.4% 55.3% 50.6% 49.4%
999.3 48.1% +5.7% [N/A]
THOUSAND +54 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SLOVENIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SLOVENIA
APR
2022

242. 242
59.4% 30.0% 45.2% 54.8%
138.9 19.4% +1.2% [N/A]
THOUSAND +1,600 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ISLANDS
THE SOLOMON
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE SOLOMON ISLANDS
APR
2022

243. 243
91.4% 21.7% 43.6% 56.4%
2.15 12.9% +4.9% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SOMALIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SOMALIA
APR
2022

244. 244
58.5% 54.4% 50.8% 49.2%
24.80 40.9% +2.5% [N/A]
MILLION +600 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
AFRICA
SOUTH
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SOUTH AFRICA
APR
2022

245. 245
41.8% 7.4% 28.1% 71.9%
550.5 4.8% +11.6% [N/A]
THOUSAND +57 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SUDAN
SOUTH
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SOUTH SUDAN
APR
2022

246. 246
46.6% 49.6% 53.1% 46.9%
20.45 43.8% +1.2% [N/A]
MILLION +250 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SPAIN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SPAIN
APR
2022

247. 247
63.7% 42.3% 36.1% 63.9%
7.30 33.9% +2.1% [N/A]
MILLION +150 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SRI LANKA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SRI LANKA
APR
2022

248. 248
80.4% 72.9% 48.7% 51.3%
335.7 56.4% -1.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND -4,450 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SURINAME
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SURINAME
APR
2022

249. 249
33.9% [N/A] 40.0% 60.0%
550 21.6% 0% [N/A]
[UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
JAN MAYEN
SVALBARD &
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SVALBARD & JAN MAYEN
APR
2022

250. 250
59.6% 68.3% 50.9% 49.1%
5.90 57.8% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SWEDEN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SWEDEN
APR
2022

251. 251
37.3% 42.1% 50.0% 50.0%
3.20 36.5% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SWITZERLAND
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
SWITZERLAND
APR
2022

252. 252
75.5% 77.2% 49.9% 50.1%
16.40 68.7% +0.3% [N/A]
MILLION +50 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
TAIWAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
TAIWAN
APR
2022

253. 253
11.4% 7.1% 25.7% 74.3%
469.2 4.7% +5.8% [N/A]
THOUSAND +26 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
TAJIKISTAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
TAJIKISTAN
APR
2022

254. 254
28.3% 11.4% 39.8% 60.2%
4.45 7.1% +2.3% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
TANZANIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
TANZANIA
APR
2022

255. 255
93.8% 84.6% 50.9% 49.1%
51.15 73.0% +2.2% [N/A]
MILLION +1.1 MILLION [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
THAILAND
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THAILAND
APR
2022

256. 256
54.5% 42.3% 43.8% 56.2%
392.9 28.8% -3.5% [N/A]
THOUSAND -14 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
TIMOR-LESTE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
TIMOR-LESTE
APR
2022

257. 257
31.2% 14.5% 29.7% 70.3%
809.0 9.4% +5.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND +41 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
TOGO
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
TOGO
APR
2022

258. 258
78.5% [N/A] 63.6% 36.4%
650 47.3% +18.2% [N/A]
+100 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
TOKELAU
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
TOKELAU
APR
2022

259. 259
155.8% 91.3% 53.7% 46.3%
69.1 64.3% -2.5% [N/A]
THOUSAND -1,750 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
TONGA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
TONGA
APR
2022

260. 260
33.3% [N/A] 60.2% 39.8%
49.9 10.7% +7.3% [N/A]
THOUSAND +3,400 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
TRANSNISTRIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
TRANSNISTRIA
APR
2022

261. 261
69.8% 64.8% 51.6% 48.4%
758.5 54.0% +0.5% [N/A]
THOUSAND +3,750 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
& TOBAGO
TRINIDAD
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
TRINIDAD & TOBAGO
APR
2022

262. 262
84.5% 77.2% 45.6% 54.4%
7.30 60.7% +2.8% [N/A]
MILLION +200 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
TUNISIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
TUNISIA
APR
2022

263. 263
49.1% 50.4% 34.4% 65.6%
34.40 40.3% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
TURKEY
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
TURKEY
APR
2022

264. 264
0.8% 0.4% 46.2% 53.8%
19.5 0.3% -4.9% [N/A]
THOUSAND -1,000 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
TURKMENISTAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
TURKMENISTAN
APR
2022

265. 265
152.5% 85.4% 45.6% 54.4%
27.7 69.8% +3.0% [N/A]
THOUSAND +800 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
CAICOS ISLANDS
THE TURKS &
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE TURKS & CAICOS ISLANDS
APR
2022

266. 266
90.2% 60.0% 49.5% 50.5%
5,350 44.5% +0.9% [N/A]
+50 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
TUVALU
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
TUVALU
APR
2022

267. 267
19.7% 8.0% 39.6% 60.4%
2.30 4.8% -8.0% [N/A]
MILLION -200 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
UGANDA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
UGANDA
APR
2022

268. 268
48.2% 41.8% 59.7% 40.3%
15.65 36.2% +1.3% [N/A]
MILLION +200 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
UKRAINE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
UKRAINE
APR
2022

269. 269
79.8% 90.9% 26.8% 73.2%
7.95 79.0% +10.4% [N/A]
MILLION +750 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ARAB EMIRATES
THE UNITED
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
APR
2022

270. 270
52.9% 61.1% 53.9% 46.1%
35.45 51.8% +1.1% [N/A]
MILLION +400 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
KINGDOM
THE UNITED
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE UNITED KINGDOM
APR
2022

271. 271
58.6% 63.8% 54.6% 45.4%
180.1 53.9% +0.3% [N/A]
MILLION +450 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
OF AMERICA
THE UNITED STATES
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
APR
2022

272. 272
38.4% 29.4% 59.3% 40.7%
25.8 24.8% +2.0% [N/A]
THOUSAND +500 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
THE UNITED STATES
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS
APR
2022

273. 273
71.5% 74.6% 56.0% 44.0%
2.15 61.5% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
URUGUAY
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
URUGUAY
APR
2022

274. 274
6.8% 6.4% 32.7% 67.3%
1.65 4.8% +6.5% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
UZBEKISTAN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
UZBEKISTAN
APR
2022

275. 275
85.0% 50.8% 51.1% 48.9%
108.9 34.0% +1.4% [N/A]
THOUSAND +1,450 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
VANUATU
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
VANUATU
APR
2022

276. 276
59.6% 55.3% 54.0% 46.0%
12.50 42.9% +2.5% [N/A]
MILLION +300 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
VENEZUELA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
VENEZUELA
APR
2022

277. 277
98.0% 89.6% 50.2% 49.8%
70.65 71.5% +0.4% [N/A]
MILLION +250 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
VIETNAM
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
VIETNAM
APR
2022

278. 278
93.1% 55.0% 57.6% 42.4%
5,000 45.4% +3.1% [N/A]
+150 [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
FUTUNA
WALLIS &
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
WALLIS & FUTUNA
APR
2022

279. 279
78.7% 69.4% 37.8% 62.2%
330.9 53.2% +8.2% [N/A]
THOUSAND +25 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
SAHARA
WESTERN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
WESTERN SAHARA
APR
2022

280. 280
34.4% 13.8% 13.4% 86.6%
2.85 9.2% 0% [N/A]
MILLION [UNCHANGED] [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
YEMEN
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
YEMEN
APR
2022

281. 281
50.2% 23.4% 43.6% 56.4%
2.80 14.5% +7.7% [N/A]
MILLION +200 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ZAMBIA
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ZAMBIA
APR
2022

282. 282
29.6% 14.3% 43.0% 57.0%
1.40 9.2% +7.7% [N/A]
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [BASE REVISIONS]
90
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
MALE FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL FACEBOOK AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN FACEBOOK AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
ZIMBABWE
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
ZIMBABWE
APR
2022

283. MORE INFORMATION

284. DATAREPORTAL.COM/LIBRARY
FIND THOUSANDS OF REPORTS EXPLORING DIGITAL TRENDS IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD IN OUR FREE ONLINE LIBRARY:

285. Learn more at kepios.com
LEARN MORE »
LEARN MORE »
LEARN MORE »
LEARN MORE »
LEARN MORE »
Go beyond headlines and
hypotheses to understand
what people are really doing
online, and turn insights into
actionable plans and results.
We research and produce
white-label content and co-
branded reports that offer
rich insights into what people
everywhere are doing online.
Add our team’s experience
and insight to your decision-
making. Available through
regular, retained advisory, or
ad hoc for one-off sessions.
Custom keynote presentations
that bring the latest digital
trends to life at conferences,
events, and private meetings,
whether online or in person.
Interactive briefings that
make it easy to keep track of
digital trends, and identify
how evolving behaviours
will impact future success.
CONSUMER
RESEARCH
REPORTS
& CONTENT
ADVISORY
SERVICES
KEYNOTE
PRESENTATIONS
DIGITAL
BRIEFINGS
In addition to producing the Global Digital Reports, we also offer:
Kepios helps the world understand what’s really happening online.
MAKE SENSE OF DIGITAL TRENDS

287. This report has been compiled by Kepios
Pte. Ltd. (“Kepios”) for informational
purposes only, and relies on data from a
wide variety of sources, including but not
limited to public and private companies,
market research firms, government
agencies, NGOs, and private individuals.
While Kepios strives to ensure that all
data and charts contained in this report
are, as at the time of publishing, accurate
and up-to-date, neither Kepios nor any of
the other brands or organisations featured
or referenced herein shall be responsible
for any errors or omissions contained in
this report, or for the results obtained from
its use.
All information contained in this report
is provided “as is”, with no guarantee
whatsoever of its accuracy, completeness,
correctness or non-infringement of third-
party rights and without warranty of any
kind, express or implied, including without
limitation, warranties of merchantability or
fitness for any particular purpose.
shall, to the fullest extent permitted by
law, be liable to you or anyone else for
any direct, indirect, punitive, incidental,
special, consequential, exemplary or
similar loss or damage, or loss or damage
of any kind, suffered by you or anyone
else as a result of any use, action or
decision taken by you or anyone else
in any way connected to this report or
the information contained herein, or the
result(s) thereof, even if advised of the
possibility of such loss or damage.
This report may contain reference to third-
party data providers, however this report
does not endorse any such third parties or
their products or services, nor is this report
sponsored by, endorsed by or associated
with such third parties.
This report is subject to change without
notice. To ensure that you have the most
recent version of this report, and to access
all of the reports in this ongoing series,
please visit our reports website at
https://datareportal.com/.
This report contains data, tables, figures,
maps, flags, analyses and technical
notes that relate to various geographical
territories around the world, however
reference to these territories and any
associated elements (including names
and flags) does not imply the expression
of any opinion whatsoever on the part
of Kepios or any of the other featured
brands, nor any of those organisations’
partners, affiliates, employees or agents,
concerning the legal status of any country,
territory, city or area or of its authorities,
or concerning the delimitation of its
frontiers or boundaries.
This report is provided with the
understanding that it does not constitute
professional advice or services of
any kind and should therefore not be
substituted for independent investigations,
thought or judgment. Accordingly,
neither Kepios nor any of the brands and
organisations featured or cited herein,
nor any of their partners, affiliates,
group companies, employees or agents
DISCLAIMER AND IMPORTANT NOTES

288. DATAREPORTAL.COM
REPORTS@KEPIOS.COM
@ESKIMON
SIMON KEMP