SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 7
High Capacity
The ability to kill, or the ability to
save?
By: Cledo Davis
The Controversy
• There has been a heated debate lately
over whether or not high capacity
magazines should be legal for U.S.
citizens to own.
• The topics of safety, necessity, power,
and Constitutional Rights are at the
epicenter of the discussion.
The Concern
• The shootings in Arizona, Colorado,
Connecticut, and the Washington D.C.
Navy Yard have sparked concern and
paranoia across the nation.
• Many wonder if the killers could have
been stopped earlier if they had lower
capacity magazines.
The Viewpoints
Argument 1
• Pro-gun individuals believe that higher
magazine capacity is a deterrent to
foreign militaries, and that it helps level
the playing field between “We The
People” and the Federal Government
• A higher number of rounds per magazine
gives lone concealed carry operators a
vital advantage when confronting multiple
attackers
• Criminals will always have access to
black market firearms and magazines,
and that the law-abiding American’s best
defense against them is to legally own
weapons of comparable firepower and
ammo capacity
• The Right to Keep And Bear Arms was
specifically intended for the purpose of
resisting tyranny, and as such implies
that Americans should have a weapons
capability equal to or greater than that of
the Federal Government
• High capacity magazines are a powerful
tool for good in the hands of a law-
abiding citizen
Argument 2
• Anti-gun individuals believe that
governmental tyranny and threat of
foreign invasion are not, nor ever will be,
an issue; and that high capacity
magazines are unnecessary to own and
merely tools for killing
• A concealed carry operator or home
defender would never need more than 7-
10 rounds to stop an attacker
• Criminals will take advantage of being
able to legally buy magazines, and will no
longer have access to high capacity
magazines if banned
• The Second Amendment was written
primarily for the purpose of hunting with
muskets, and The Founding Fathers
could not have imagined that we would
have such powerful firearms today
• High capacity magazines are dangerous,
unfit for civilian use and should be
banned
The Facts
• Criminal are classified as such because they have no regard for the
law, and making it against the law to purchase and own high capacity
magazines will not deter them
• Law enforcement agencies have been trying for decades to take control
of the black market, but despite their best efforts, the sale and purchase
of illegal firearms is alive and well in today’s society
• Unknown to many, several of the recent highly publicized shootings did
not even involve the use of high capacity magazines
The Evidence
• In a live fire test conducted by Sheriff Ken Campbell of Boone
County, Indiana, it was shown that limiting magazine capacity
has minimal effect in slowing down a proficient shooter [1]
List Of References
• 1 "NRA News | Sheriff Debunks "High-Capacity" Magazine Theory." NRA News | Sheriff
Debunks "High-Capacity" Magazine Theory. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Mar. 2014.

More Related Content

Similar to High capacity

Gun control in_michigan_final
Gun control in_michigan_finalGun control in_michigan_final
Gun control in_michigan_final
izaana
 

Similar to High capacity (13)

Gun control in the us
Gun control in the usGun control in the us
Gun control in the us
 
Gun Laws
Gun LawsGun Laws
Gun Laws
 
Gun controll
Gun controllGun controll
Gun controll
 
Week 2
Week 2Week 2
Week 2
 
Gunsense! on Gun Violence in the U.S.
Gunsense! on Gun Violence in the U.S.Gunsense! on Gun Violence in the U.S.
Gunsense! on Gun Violence in the U.S.
 
Defence and Security
Defence and SecurityDefence and Security
Defence and Security
 
Citizen MB
Citizen MBCitizen MB
Citizen MB
 
Citizenship In The World - Merit Badge University 2018
Citizenship In The World - Merit Badge University 2018Citizenship In The World - Merit Badge University 2018
Citizenship In The World - Merit Badge University 2018
 
Dean r berry pro and con gun control
Dean r berry pro and con gun controlDean r berry pro and con gun control
Dean r berry pro and con gun control
 
Dean R Berry Pro and Con Gun Control
Dean R Berry Pro and Con Gun ControlDean R Berry Pro and Con Gun Control
Dean R Berry Pro and Con Gun Control
 
Democrat or Republican-Gun Rights 1-81
Democrat or Republican-Gun Rights 1-81Democrat or Republican-Gun Rights 1-81
Democrat or Republican-Gun Rights 1-81
 
Gun control in_michigan_final
Gun control in_michigan_finalGun control in_michigan_final
Gun control in_michigan_final
 
Gun cont
Gun contGun cont
Gun cont
 

High capacity

  • 1. High Capacity The ability to kill, or the ability to save? By: Cledo Davis
  • 2. The Controversy • There has been a heated debate lately over whether or not high capacity magazines should be legal for U.S. citizens to own. • The topics of safety, necessity, power, and Constitutional Rights are at the epicenter of the discussion.
  • 3. The Concern • The shootings in Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, and the Washington D.C. Navy Yard have sparked concern and paranoia across the nation. • Many wonder if the killers could have been stopped earlier if they had lower capacity magazines.
  • 4. The Viewpoints Argument 1 • Pro-gun individuals believe that higher magazine capacity is a deterrent to foreign militaries, and that it helps level the playing field between “We The People” and the Federal Government • A higher number of rounds per magazine gives lone concealed carry operators a vital advantage when confronting multiple attackers • Criminals will always have access to black market firearms and magazines, and that the law-abiding American’s best defense against them is to legally own weapons of comparable firepower and ammo capacity • The Right to Keep And Bear Arms was specifically intended for the purpose of resisting tyranny, and as such implies that Americans should have a weapons capability equal to or greater than that of the Federal Government • High capacity magazines are a powerful tool for good in the hands of a law- abiding citizen Argument 2 • Anti-gun individuals believe that governmental tyranny and threat of foreign invasion are not, nor ever will be, an issue; and that high capacity magazines are unnecessary to own and merely tools for killing • A concealed carry operator or home defender would never need more than 7- 10 rounds to stop an attacker • Criminals will take advantage of being able to legally buy magazines, and will no longer have access to high capacity magazines if banned • The Second Amendment was written primarily for the purpose of hunting with muskets, and The Founding Fathers could not have imagined that we would have such powerful firearms today • High capacity magazines are dangerous, unfit for civilian use and should be banned
  • 5. The Facts • Criminal are classified as such because they have no regard for the law, and making it against the law to purchase and own high capacity magazines will not deter them • Law enforcement agencies have been trying for decades to take control of the black market, but despite their best efforts, the sale and purchase of illegal firearms is alive and well in today’s society • Unknown to many, several of the recent highly publicized shootings did not even involve the use of high capacity magazines
  • 6. The Evidence • In a live fire test conducted by Sheriff Ken Campbell of Boone County, Indiana, it was shown that limiting magazine capacity has minimal effect in slowing down a proficient shooter [1]
  • 7. List Of References • 1 "NRA News | Sheriff Debunks "High-Capacity" Magazine Theory." NRA News | Sheriff Debunks "High-Capacity" Magazine Theory. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Mar. 2014.