SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
TO: Dr. Marianna Richardson
FROM: William L. Taylor
SUBJECT: De Paula, Marilene. “The 2014 World Cup in Brazil: Its Legacy and Challenges.”
Klartext Verlag GmbH (2014). Accessed February 10, 2016.
http://www.solidar.ch/sites/default/files/project_files/study_world_cup_brazil_0.p
df
No event has ever gathered a more diverse crowd of people in the course of human history than
the 2014 FIFA World Cup. Drawing in audiences from around the globe, the 2014 World Cup is,
without a doubt, a spectacular event that greatly impacts the economy of the country that caters
it. My business topic seeks to analyze the economic impact caused by building new stadiums for
the 2014 World Cup on its host country of Brazil. The article written by Mrs. De Paula delivers
insightful information that examines the impact of World Cup stadiums being built in Brazil. Of
this information I find the following topics particularly interesting and relatable to my business
topic: (a) the sources of funding for new stadiums, and (b) Brazil’s public debt and economy.
Sources of Funding for New Stadiums
Once the new World Cup stadiums were complete, they were ready to be filled. The stadiums
were a fairly large success when it came to filling in seats. According to the article an estimated
3.17 million fans total watched the games in the new stadiums (p. 13). It raises the question of
how the stadiums were financed.
At first the stadiums were to be financed through private investors, however the taxpayers of
Brazil ended up carrying the majority of the costs for constructing, upgrading, and maintaining
the stadiums. The total cost of the 12 new World Cup stadiums alone is estimated to be at $4.21
billion dollars and the average construction cost per seat in the stadiums is six thousand two
hundred thirty dollars (p. 13). The
graph shown to the left compares
the average construction cost per
seat in the 2008, 2010, and 2014
World Cups held respectively in
South Africa, Germany, and Brazil.
From this illustration it is obvious
that Brazil has spent considerably
more on average per seat than the
previously held World Cup
countries on the list.
Brazil’s Public Debt and Economy
Before the 2014 World Cup many Brazilians were hopeful that the world-renowned sporting
event would bring in much needed economic relief to their country. Many hoped that between
building stadiums, and the tourism involved with the soccer games, job growth and generation
$0.00
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$6,000.00
$8,000.00
$3,640 $3,380
$6,230
AverageConstructionCostPerSeat
South Africa Germany Brazil
would occur. The building of the new and massive World Cup soccer stadiums throughout the
country was even going to be paid for by private investors limiting the amount of taxation on
Brazilians.
However the results seem to display an opposite effect. In April of 2014 São Paulo daily (one of
the most influential daily news magazines in Brazil) announced a 51 percent increase in public
debt in the 12 host cities while, in the same period, public debt in the other capital cities where
stadiums were not being built increased by twenty percent, or less than half. As a result of this
increase in public debt, Brazil’s economy slowed and many among the civilian population
became unhappy with the amount that they were being taxed. Riots and civil unrest ensued
which resulted in the loss of business from investors.
By the end of the World Cup it was estimated by the Ministry of Tourism and the Institute of
Economic Research Foundation (FIPE) that “the World Cup injected BRL 30b into the Brazilian
economy, a sum approximating its total cost of BRL 25.6b, which amounts to 0.7% of Brazil's
GDP for 2013.” This shows that the net economic impact of the World Cup on Brazil was almost
nothing.
Conclusion
From this article I have learned a great deal about the sources of funding for new sports stadiums
and Brazil’s public debt and economy. This information will help me further understand this
complex economic situation. I have also derived a number of questions from this article that I
hope to explore further in my research. Some of these questions are the following: How much
did taxes increase for Brazilian taxpayers? Who were the private investors that backed out of the
stadium financing? By further researching I hope to find the answers to these questions and
more.

More Related Content

Similar to World Cup Formal email (Draft)

Brazil Report_2_final
Brazil Report_2_finalBrazil Report_2_final
Brazil Report_2_finalDoug Gray
 
FIFA World Cup 2014: Social Impacts and Policy Strategies
FIFA World Cup 2014: Social Impacts and Policy StrategiesFIFA World Cup 2014: Social Impacts and Policy Strategies
FIFA World Cup 2014: Social Impacts and Policy StrategiesFlavio Kleijssen
 
World Cup 2014 & Olympics 2016, The Possible Impacts
World Cup 2014 & Olympics 2016, The Possible ImpactsWorld Cup 2014 & Olympics 2016, The Possible Impacts
World Cup 2014 & Olympics 2016, The Possible Impactsmiss_hajar
 
Legacy of Sports events presentation
Legacy of Sports events presentation Legacy of Sports events presentation
Legacy of Sports events presentation UNDP Policy Centre
 
The economics of world cup 2014
The economics of world cup 2014The economics of world cup 2014
The economics of world cup 2014team-abr
 
The Economics of Hosting a World Cup
The Economics of Hosting a World Cup The Economics of Hosting a World Cup
The Economics of Hosting a World Cup QNB Group
 
2014 World Cup Digital Marketing insights
2014 World Cup Digital Marketing insights2014 World Cup Digital Marketing insights
2014 World Cup Digital Marketing insightsTracy Northcutt
 
October 2010 - Construction takes a great leap forward
October 2010 - Construction takes a great leap forwardOctober 2010 - Construction takes a great leap forward
October 2010 - Construction takes a great leap forwardFGV Brazil
 
Soccer World Cup
Soccer World CupSoccer World Cup
Soccer World CupTim Michael
 
Country report brazil. m&a update. spring 2013. norgestion mergers alliance
Country report brazil. m&a update. spring 2013. norgestion mergers allianceCountry report brazil. m&a update. spring 2013. norgestion mergers alliance
Country report brazil. m&a update. spring 2013. norgestion mergers allianceNORGESTION
 

Similar to World Cup Formal email (Draft) (20)

Brazil Report_2_final
Brazil Report_2_finalBrazil Report_2_final
Brazil Report_2_final
 
FIFA World Cup 2014: Social Impacts and Policy Strategies
FIFA World Cup 2014: Social Impacts and Policy StrategiesFIFA World Cup 2014: Social Impacts and Policy Strategies
FIFA World Cup 2014: Social Impacts and Policy Strategies
 
World Cup 2014 & Olympics 2016, The Possible Impacts
World Cup 2014 & Olympics 2016, The Possible ImpactsWorld Cup 2014 & Olympics 2016, The Possible Impacts
World Cup 2014 & Olympics 2016, The Possible Impacts
 
Legacy of Sports events presentation
Legacy of Sports events presentation Legacy of Sports events presentation
Legacy of Sports events presentation
 
The economics of world cup 2014
The economics of world cup 2014The economics of world cup 2014
The economics of world cup 2014
 
Forecasting football results and its market
Forecasting football results and its marketForecasting football results and its market
Forecasting football results and its market
 
The Economics of Hosting a World Cup
The Economics of Hosting a World Cup The Economics of Hosting a World Cup
The Economics of Hosting a World Cup
 
IMSFinalGroupProject
IMSFinalGroupProjectIMSFinalGroupProject
IMSFinalGroupProject
 
2014 World Cup Digital Marketing insights
2014 World Cup Digital Marketing insights2014 World Cup Digital Marketing insights
2014 World Cup Digital Marketing insights
 
Como abrir uma empresa no brasil pela amcham
Como abrir uma empresa no brasil pela amcham Como abrir uma empresa no brasil pela amcham
Como abrir uma empresa no brasil pela amcham
 
Como abrir uma empresa no brasil pela Amcham
Como abrir uma empresa no brasil pela Amcham Como abrir uma empresa no brasil pela Amcham
Como abrir uma empresa no brasil pela Amcham
 
Agenda Suramerica January 2013
Agenda Suramerica January 2013Agenda Suramerica January 2013
Agenda Suramerica January 2013
 
Brazil3- Forbes
Brazil3- ForbesBrazil3- Forbes
Brazil3- Forbes
 
Brazil Fifa World Cup
Brazil   Fifa World CupBrazil   Fifa World Cup
Brazil Fifa World Cup
 
Brazil4-Forbes
Brazil4-ForbesBrazil4-Forbes
Brazil4-Forbes
 
World Cup Economics 2018
World Cup Economics 2018World Cup Economics 2018
World Cup Economics 2018
 
October 2010 - Construction takes a great leap forward
October 2010 - Construction takes a great leap forwardOctober 2010 - Construction takes a great leap forward
October 2010 - Construction takes a great leap forward
 
Soccer World Cup
Soccer World CupSoccer World Cup
Soccer World Cup
 
Brazilcs
BrazilcsBrazilcs
Brazilcs
 
Country report brazil. m&a update. spring 2013. norgestion mergers alliance
Country report brazil. m&a update. spring 2013. norgestion mergers allianceCountry report brazil. m&a update. spring 2013. norgestion mergers alliance
Country report brazil. m&a update. spring 2013. norgestion mergers alliance
 

World Cup Formal email (Draft)

  • 1. TO: Dr. Marianna Richardson FROM: William L. Taylor SUBJECT: De Paula, Marilene. “The 2014 World Cup in Brazil: Its Legacy and Challenges.” Klartext Verlag GmbH (2014). Accessed February 10, 2016. http://www.solidar.ch/sites/default/files/project_files/study_world_cup_brazil_0.p df No event has ever gathered a more diverse crowd of people in the course of human history than the 2014 FIFA World Cup. Drawing in audiences from around the globe, the 2014 World Cup is, without a doubt, a spectacular event that greatly impacts the economy of the country that caters it. My business topic seeks to analyze the economic impact caused by building new stadiums for the 2014 World Cup on its host country of Brazil. The article written by Mrs. De Paula delivers insightful information that examines the impact of World Cup stadiums being built in Brazil. Of this information I find the following topics particularly interesting and relatable to my business topic: (a) the sources of funding for new stadiums, and (b) Brazil’s public debt and economy. Sources of Funding for New Stadiums Once the new World Cup stadiums were complete, they were ready to be filled. The stadiums were a fairly large success when it came to filling in seats. According to the article an estimated 3.17 million fans total watched the games in the new stadiums (p. 13). It raises the question of how the stadiums were financed. At first the stadiums were to be financed through private investors, however the taxpayers of Brazil ended up carrying the majority of the costs for constructing, upgrading, and maintaining the stadiums. The total cost of the 12 new World Cup stadiums alone is estimated to be at $4.21 billion dollars and the average construction cost per seat in the stadiums is six thousand two hundred thirty dollars (p. 13). The graph shown to the left compares the average construction cost per seat in the 2008, 2010, and 2014 World Cups held respectively in South Africa, Germany, and Brazil. From this illustration it is obvious that Brazil has spent considerably more on average per seat than the previously held World Cup countries on the list. Brazil’s Public Debt and Economy Before the 2014 World Cup many Brazilians were hopeful that the world-renowned sporting event would bring in much needed economic relief to their country. Many hoped that between building stadiums, and the tourism involved with the soccer games, job growth and generation $0.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $6,000.00 $8,000.00 $3,640 $3,380 $6,230 AverageConstructionCostPerSeat South Africa Germany Brazil
  • 2. would occur. The building of the new and massive World Cup soccer stadiums throughout the country was even going to be paid for by private investors limiting the amount of taxation on Brazilians. However the results seem to display an opposite effect. In April of 2014 São Paulo daily (one of the most influential daily news magazines in Brazil) announced a 51 percent increase in public debt in the 12 host cities while, in the same period, public debt in the other capital cities where stadiums were not being built increased by twenty percent, or less than half. As a result of this increase in public debt, Brazil’s economy slowed and many among the civilian population became unhappy with the amount that they were being taxed. Riots and civil unrest ensued which resulted in the loss of business from investors. By the end of the World Cup it was estimated by the Ministry of Tourism and the Institute of Economic Research Foundation (FIPE) that “the World Cup injected BRL 30b into the Brazilian economy, a sum approximating its total cost of BRL 25.6b, which amounts to 0.7% of Brazil's GDP for 2013.” This shows that the net economic impact of the World Cup on Brazil was almost nothing. Conclusion From this article I have learned a great deal about the sources of funding for new sports stadiums and Brazil’s public debt and economy. This information will help me further understand this complex economic situation. I have also derived a number of questions from this article that I hope to explore further in my research. Some of these questions are the following: How much did taxes increase for Brazilian taxpayers? Who were the private investors that backed out of the stadium financing? By further researching I hope to find the answers to these questions and more.