SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Test Case ID: 01 Bill – PASS
Test Case Title: Missingapp with issuesgetsadded Eric – PASS
Test Case Conditions: Kong – PASS
Test Date: 11/10/2015
Description: An application that wasmissingfromthe list, andit gets added mid-reporting. A couple issuesalready existed for the application in theIssuesLog.
Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail)
1 Issuesalready show in data See issues inrawdata Issues Exist Pass
2 App showson refresh App pops up in list afterrefresh App showed upafter 1 refresh Pass
3 Issuesmap to App Issues autopopulate withapplication The issues showed upunder the app Pass
4 Validate formatting Supports SP List Values Matches List Pass
5 Validate content Supports SP List Values Matches List Pass
Test Case ID: 02 Bill – PASS
Test Case Title: Existing Appgets assignedan issue Eric – PASS
Test Case Conditions: Data already exists Kong – PASS
Test Date: 11/10/2015
Description: An issuethat is reportingunder a particular application A is actually an issuethat pertains toanother existingapplication B. The existing“green”
application B is assignedtheissue (medium, high,or critical) thatbelongedto application A.
Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail)
1 Issuesalready show in data See issues Issues exist Pass
2 Appsalready show in data See apps Apps exist Pass
3 Map issuesfrom A to B Name appears intheFinalApp Listand
DSR Rules Say =Show
The final applistupdates andthe
rules column says show
The rules column is new,
compares thedeployeddate
to the createdateofthe
issue along with report logic.
Pass
4 Click Refresh Issues movefromapp Ato app B Issues movetoappB Pass
5 Validate formatting Supports Override, thenSP List Matches Override Pass
6 Validate content Supports Override, thenSP List Matches Override Pass
Test Case ID: 03 Bill – PASS
Test Case Title: Manager asksfor an issueto not report Eric – PASS
Test Case Conditions: Issue currently reporting Kong – PASS
Test Date: 11/10/2015
Description: An application with x number ofissues is reportingon theissues. A manager asksfora particular issueto not show up on the report. The user is not
allowedto updatethe SP list.
Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail)
1 App showsin data See app App exists Pass
2 Issue showsin data See issue Issue exists Pass
3 Set the issue OVERRIDE The overrideis now=Hide Override is =to “Hide” Pass
4 Click Refresh The issuevanishes fromreport Issue goes away Pass
5 Validate formatting Supports override Matches override Pass
6 Validate content Supports override Matches override Pass
Test Case ID: 04 Bill – PASS
Test Case Title: DeployedSuccessful willnotcollect issues, even valid
issues
Eric – PASS
Test Case Conditions: Issue is createdafter app setto Deployed
Successful. The issue is open and nota pre-deployment issue
Kong – PASS
Test Date: 11/10/2015
Description: There is a rule that saysissues donotshow if closed orpre-deployment. Issues should not show upafter an application deploys. An appdeploys and
is reportedon as deployedsuccessfully without any issues. Then an open/non-pre-deployment issue is createdandassignedto the app. The appcontinuesto report
without adding issuescreatedafter thedeployment date/time (actual time,not SP List value).
Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail)
1 App Deploys The app turns blueand movedto
bottom saying “DeployedSuccessfully”
The app is blueand atbottomwith no
issues
Pass
2 Issue Created The issueshows upin theraw data The issuepops upin the raw data Pass
3 Click Refresh The app does notdisplay the issue The issuemarked Hidein the rawdata Pass
4 Validate formatting Does NOTsupport theSP Listvalues,
the issues wouldnormally show
The issuedoes not show up Pass
5 Validate content Does NOTsupport theSP Listvalues,
the issues wouldnormally show
The issuedoes not show up Pass
Test Case ID: 05 Bill –
Test Case Title: Track Only appgetsaddedas rolled,additionalissue
added
Eric –
Test Case Conditions: Any issue thatgetsaddedto a RB or PRB should
show up unless user overridestheissue. Test both sides.
Kong –
Test Date: 11/12/2015
Description: Whathappensto thereportoncea TO itemgets added? Whatabout when theissueskeep rolling in forthat TO item?
Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail)
1 Add Appsto TOlist Shows up in report footer withred
color
Pass
2 Create new issue or map
issue with > Rolled Date
Issue willshow upin report for RB Pass
3 Existing Issue or < Rolled
Date getsmapped
Issue willshow upin report for PRB Pass
4 Click Refresh All issues continueto showup for app Pass
5 Validate content and
formatting
These Apps only found in theTO list as
rolled or deployed. Issues will continue
to populate for rolled back apps where
CDate>Rdate.
Pass
Test Case ID: 06 Bill –
Test Case Title: Track Only appgetsaddedas deploy,additionalissue
added
Eric –
Test Case Conditions: Any issue thatgetsaddedto a DS or DWIshould
not show up unless user overrides the issue. Test both sides.
Kong –
Test Date: 11/12/2015
Description: Whathappensto thereportoncea TO itemgets added? Whatabout when theissueskeep rolling in forthat TO item?
Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail)
1 Add Appsto TOlist Shows up in report footer withblue
color
Pass
2 Create new issue or map
issue with >Deploy Date
Issue willnot show up Pass
3 Existing Issue or < Deploy
Date getsmapped
Issues show upfor DWI, should not be
enteredfor DS so keep aneyeon them
Pass
4 Click Refresh Issues show upfor app butnotafter
dep date.
Pass
5 Validate content and
formatting
Hide overridefor DS issues
CDate<Ddate works. Eachissueis
correct colorand only shows for
existing DWIapps
Pass
Test Case ID: 07 Bill –
Test Case Title: The status reason section expandsfor both redandyellow Eric –
Test Case Conditions: Thisis post refresh click. Each cell is expectedto
have a customheight to contain allof statustext.
Kong –
Test Date: 11/12/2015
Description: We now have customheightfor rows,allowingstatustext to display andmaking it so thattheuser will nothaveto expand the cells.
Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail)
1 After refresh enter status’ Type rows oftextwithout expanding
cells
Pass
2 Prep Report Click See third row Pass
3 Send Email Wait time1 min for generate Pass
4 Validate Email Each cell is perfectsize for report Pass
Test Case ID: 0 Bill –
Test Case Title: T Eric –
Test Case Conditions: A Kong –
Test Date: 11/12/2015
Description:
Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail)
1 Pass
2 Pass
3 Pass
4 Pass
5 Pass
Test Case ID: 0 Bill –
Test Case Title: T Eric –
Test Case Conditions: A Kong –
Test Date: 11/12/2015
Description:
Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail)
1 Pass
2 Pass
3 Pass
4 Pass
5 Pass
Test Case ID: 0 Bill –
Test Case Title: T Eric –
Test Case Conditions: A Kong –
Test Date: 11/12/2015
Description:
Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail)
1 Pass
2 Pass
3 Pass
4 Pass
5 Pass
Test Case ID: 0 Bill –
Test Case Title: T Eric –
Test Case Conditions: A Kong –
Test Date: 11/12/2015
Description:
Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail)
1 Pass
2 Pass
3 Pass
4 Pass
5 Pass
Test Case ID: 0 Bill –
Test Case Title: T Eric –
Test Case Conditions: A Kong –
Test Date: 11/12/2015
Description:
Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail)
1 Pass
2 Pass
3 Pass
4 Pass
5 Pass
Test Case ID: 0 Bill –
Test Case Title: T Eric –
Test Case Conditions: A Kong –
Test Date: 11/12/2015
Description:
Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail)
1 Pass
2 Pass
3 Pass
4 Pass
5 Pass

More Related Content

Similar to DSR Test Case Doc

Testcase training
Testcase trainingTestcase training
Testcase trainingmedsherb
 
Manual testing centers marathahalli
Manual testing centers marathahalli Manual testing centers marathahalli
Manual testing centers marathahalli Gyanguide1
 
First Approval Flow - Microsoft Flow
First Approval Flow - Microsoft FlowFirst Approval Flow - Microsoft Flow
First Approval Flow - Microsoft FlowPriority SharePoint
 
DATA: Marketing Analytics. How Not to Shoot Yourself in the Foot!
DATA: Marketing Analytics. How Not to Shoot Yourself in the Foot!DATA: Marketing Analytics. How Not to Shoot Yourself in the Foot!
DATA: Marketing Analytics. How Not to Shoot Yourself in the Foot!AppsFlyer
 
20190110 LeanKanban Meetup Story Splitting and Automated Testing
20190110 LeanKanban Meetup Story Splitting and Automated Testing20190110 LeanKanban Meetup Story Splitting and Automated Testing
20190110 LeanKanban Meetup Story Splitting and Automated TestingCraeg Strong
 
Administrative InformationDate AssignedSaturday, March 30, 2.docx
Administrative InformationDate AssignedSaturday, March 30, 2.docxAdministrative InformationDate AssignedSaturday, March 30, 2.docx
Administrative InformationDate AssignedSaturday, March 30, 2.docxcoubroughcosta
 
Daily statusreport
Daily statusreportDaily statusreport
Daily statusreportTestingGeeks
 
Process Builder is an #AwesomeAdmin's Swiss Army Knife by Jennifer Lee
Process Builder is an #AwesomeAdmin's Swiss Army Knife by Jennifer LeeProcess Builder is an #AwesomeAdmin's Swiss Army Knife by Jennifer Lee
Process Builder is an #AwesomeAdmin's Swiss Army Knife by Jennifer LeeSalesforce Admins
 
Strategies For Software Test Documentation
Strategies For Software Test Documentation Strategies For Software Test Documentation
Strategies For Software Test Documentation Vishwak Solution
 
Bug Process & Power_of_QA
Bug Process & Power_of_QABug Process & Power_of_QA
Bug Process & Power_of_QASajid Sidi
 
Microsoft az-204 download free demo at dumps cafe
Microsoft az-204 download free demo at dumps cafeMicrosoft az-204 download free demo at dumps cafe
Microsoft az-204 download free demo at dumps cafeJeannieHeldt
 
TEST CASE GENERATION GENERATION BLOCK BOX APPROACH
TEST CASE GENERATION GENERATION BLOCK BOX APPROACHTEST CASE GENERATION GENERATION BLOCK BOX APPROACH
TEST CASE GENERATION GENERATION BLOCK BOX APPROACHSneha Padhiar
 
TIZEN Application Validation
TIZEN Application ValidationTIZEN Application Validation
TIZEN Application ValidationRyo Jin
 
UCD Agile A3 Lean Practitioner report.pptx
UCD Agile A3 Lean Practitioner report.pptxUCD Agile A3 Lean Practitioner report.pptx
UCD Agile A3 Lean Practitioner report.pptxvinays596676
 
Software testing for biginners
Software testing for biginnersSoftware testing for biginners
Software testing for biginnersSriman Eshwar
 

Similar to DSR Test Case Doc (20)

Testcase training
Testcase trainingTestcase training
Testcase training
 
Manual testing centers marathahalli
Manual testing centers marathahalli Manual testing centers marathahalli
Manual testing centers marathahalli
 
First Approval Flow - Microsoft Flow
First Approval Flow - Microsoft FlowFirst Approval Flow - Microsoft Flow
First Approval Flow - Microsoft Flow
 
DATA: Marketing Analytics. How Not to Shoot Yourself in the Foot!
DATA: Marketing Analytics. How Not to Shoot Yourself in the Foot!DATA: Marketing Analytics. How Not to Shoot Yourself in the Foot!
DATA: Marketing Analytics. How Not to Shoot Yourself in the Foot!
 
20190110 LeanKanban Meetup Story Splitting and Automated Testing
20190110 LeanKanban Meetup Story Splitting and Automated Testing20190110 LeanKanban Meetup Story Splitting and Automated Testing
20190110 LeanKanban Meetup Story Splitting and Automated Testing
 
Administrative InformationDate AssignedSaturday, March 30, 2.docx
Administrative InformationDate AssignedSaturday, March 30, 2.docxAdministrative InformationDate AssignedSaturday, March 30, 2.docx
Administrative InformationDate AssignedSaturday, March 30, 2.docx
 
Daily statusreport
Daily statusreportDaily statusreport
Daily statusreport
 
SWQ
SWQSWQ
SWQ
 
Process Builder is an #AwesomeAdmin's Swiss Army Knife by Jennifer Lee
Process Builder is an #AwesomeAdmin's Swiss Army Knife by Jennifer LeeProcess Builder is an #AwesomeAdmin's Swiss Army Knife by Jennifer Lee
Process Builder is an #AwesomeAdmin's Swiss Army Knife by Jennifer Lee
 
Strategies For Software Test Documentation
Strategies For Software Test Documentation Strategies For Software Test Documentation
Strategies For Software Test Documentation
 
Double Loop
Double LoopDouble Loop
Double Loop
 
Bug Process & Power_of_QA
Bug Process & Power_of_QABug Process & Power_of_QA
Bug Process & Power_of_QA
 
Microsoft az-204 download free demo at dumps cafe
Microsoft az-204 download free demo at dumps cafeMicrosoft az-204 download free demo at dumps cafe
Microsoft az-204 download free demo at dumps cafe
 
TEST CASE GENERATION GENERATION BLOCK BOX APPROACH
TEST CASE GENERATION GENERATION BLOCK BOX APPROACHTEST CASE GENERATION GENERATION BLOCK BOX APPROACH
TEST CASE GENERATION GENERATION BLOCK BOX APPROACH
 
TIZEN Application Validation
TIZEN Application ValidationTIZEN Application Validation
TIZEN Application Validation
 
UCD Agile A3 Lean Practitioner report.pptx
UCD Agile A3 Lean Practitioner report.pptxUCD Agile A3 Lean Practitioner report.pptx
UCD Agile A3 Lean Practitioner report.pptx
 
E- thapal kerala Help line James joseph Adhikarathil
E- thapal kerala Help  line James joseph AdhikarathilE- thapal kerala Help  line James joseph Adhikarathil
E- thapal kerala Help line James joseph Adhikarathil
 
Agilent Technologies Demo
Agilent Technologies DemoAgilent Technologies Demo
Agilent Technologies Demo
 
Software testing for biginners
Software testing for biginnersSoftware testing for biginners
Software testing for biginners
 
Testing
TestingTesting
Testing
 

DSR Test Case Doc

  • 1. Test Case ID: 01 Bill – PASS Test Case Title: Missingapp with issuesgetsadded Eric – PASS Test Case Conditions: Kong – PASS Test Date: 11/10/2015 Description: An application that wasmissingfromthe list, andit gets added mid-reporting. A couple issuesalready existed for the application in theIssuesLog. Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail) 1 Issuesalready show in data See issues inrawdata Issues Exist Pass 2 App showson refresh App pops up in list afterrefresh App showed upafter 1 refresh Pass 3 Issuesmap to App Issues autopopulate withapplication The issues showed upunder the app Pass 4 Validate formatting Supports SP List Values Matches List Pass 5 Validate content Supports SP List Values Matches List Pass Test Case ID: 02 Bill – PASS Test Case Title: Existing Appgets assignedan issue Eric – PASS Test Case Conditions: Data already exists Kong – PASS Test Date: 11/10/2015 Description: An issuethat is reportingunder a particular application A is actually an issuethat pertains toanother existingapplication B. The existing“green” application B is assignedtheissue (medium, high,or critical) thatbelongedto application A. Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail) 1 Issuesalready show in data See issues Issues exist Pass 2 Appsalready show in data See apps Apps exist Pass 3 Map issuesfrom A to B Name appears intheFinalApp Listand DSR Rules Say =Show The final applistupdates andthe rules column says show The rules column is new, compares thedeployeddate to the createdateofthe issue along with report logic. Pass 4 Click Refresh Issues movefromapp Ato app B Issues movetoappB Pass 5 Validate formatting Supports Override, thenSP List Matches Override Pass 6 Validate content Supports Override, thenSP List Matches Override Pass Test Case ID: 03 Bill – PASS Test Case Title: Manager asksfor an issueto not report Eric – PASS Test Case Conditions: Issue currently reporting Kong – PASS Test Date: 11/10/2015
  • 2. Description: An application with x number ofissues is reportingon theissues. A manager asksfora particular issueto not show up on the report. The user is not allowedto updatethe SP list. Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail) 1 App showsin data See app App exists Pass 2 Issue showsin data See issue Issue exists Pass 3 Set the issue OVERRIDE The overrideis now=Hide Override is =to “Hide” Pass 4 Click Refresh The issuevanishes fromreport Issue goes away Pass 5 Validate formatting Supports override Matches override Pass 6 Validate content Supports override Matches override Pass Test Case ID: 04 Bill – PASS Test Case Title: DeployedSuccessful willnotcollect issues, even valid issues Eric – PASS Test Case Conditions: Issue is createdafter app setto Deployed Successful. The issue is open and nota pre-deployment issue Kong – PASS Test Date: 11/10/2015 Description: There is a rule that saysissues donotshow if closed orpre-deployment. Issues should not show upafter an application deploys. An appdeploys and is reportedon as deployedsuccessfully without any issues. Then an open/non-pre-deployment issue is createdandassignedto the app. The appcontinuesto report without adding issuescreatedafter thedeployment date/time (actual time,not SP List value). Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail) 1 App Deploys The app turns blueand movedto bottom saying “DeployedSuccessfully” The app is blueand atbottomwith no issues Pass 2 Issue Created The issueshows upin theraw data The issuepops upin the raw data Pass 3 Click Refresh The app does notdisplay the issue The issuemarked Hidein the rawdata Pass 4 Validate formatting Does NOTsupport theSP Listvalues, the issues wouldnormally show The issuedoes not show up Pass 5 Validate content Does NOTsupport theSP Listvalues, the issues wouldnormally show The issuedoes not show up Pass Test Case ID: 05 Bill – Test Case Title: Track Only appgetsaddedas rolled,additionalissue added Eric – Test Case Conditions: Any issue thatgetsaddedto a RB or PRB should show up unless user overridestheissue. Test both sides. Kong – Test Date: 11/12/2015
  • 3. Description: Whathappensto thereportoncea TO itemgets added? Whatabout when theissueskeep rolling in forthat TO item? Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail) 1 Add Appsto TOlist Shows up in report footer withred color Pass 2 Create new issue or map issue with > Rolled Date Issue willshow upin report for RB Pass 3 Existing Issue or < Rolled Date getsmapped Issue willshow upin report for PRB Pass 4 Click Refresh All issues continueto showup for app Pass 5 Validate content and formatting These Apps only found in theTO list as rolled or deployed. Issues will continue to populate for rolled back apps where CDate>Rdate. Pass Test Case ID: 06 Bill – Test Case Title: Track Only appgetsaddedas deploy,additionalissue added Eric – Test Case Conditions: Any issue thatgetsaddedto a DS or DWIshould not show up unless user overrides the issue. Test both sides. Kong – Test Date: 11/12/2015 Description: Whathappensto thereportoncea TO itemgets added? Whatabout when theissueskeep rolling in forthat TO item? Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail) 1 Add Appsto TOlist Shows up in report footer withblue color Pass 2 Create new issue or map issue with >Deploy Date Issue willnot show up Pass 3 Existing Issue or < Deploy Date getsmapped Issues show upfor DWI, should not be enteredfor DS so keep aneyeon them Pass 4 Click Refresh Issues show upfor app butnotafter dep date. Pass 5 Validate content and formatting Hide overridefor DS issues CDate<Ddate works. Eachissueis correct colorand only shows for existing DWIapps Pass Test Case ID: 07 Bill –
  • 4. Test Case Title: The status reason section expandsfor both redandyellow Eric – Test Case Conditions: Thisis post refresh click. Each cell is expectedto have a customheight to contain allof statustext. Kong – Test Date: 11/12/2015 Description: We now have customheightfor rows,allowingstatustext to display andmaking it so thattheuser will nothaveto expand the cells. Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail) 1 After refresh enter status’ Type rows oftextwithout expanding cells Pass 2 Prep Report Click See third row Pass 3 Send Email Wait time1 min for generate Pass 4 Validate Email Each cell is perfectsize for report Pass Test Case ID: 0 Bill – Test Case Title: T Eric – Test Case Conditions: A Kong – Test Date: 11/12/2015 Description: Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail) 1 Pass 2 Pass 3 Pass 4 Pass 5 Pass Test Case ID: 0 Bill – Test Case Title: T Eric – Test Case Conditions: A Kong – Test Date: 11/12/2015 Description: Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail) 1 Pass 2 Pass 3 Pass
  • 5. 4 Pass 5 Pass Test Case ID: 0 Bill – Test Case Title: T Eric – Test Case Conditions: A Kong – Test Date: 11/12/2015 Description: Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail) 1 Pass 2 Pass 3 Pass 4 Pass 5 Pass Test Case ID: 0 Bill – Test Case Title: T Eric – Test Case Conditions: A Kong – Test Date: 11/12/2015 Description: Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail) 1 Pass 2 Pass 3 Pass 4 Pass 5 Pass Test Case ID: 0 Bill – Test Case Title: T Eric – Test Case Conditions: A Kong – Test Date: 11/12/2015
  • 6. Description: Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail) 1 Pass 2 Pass 3 Pass 4 Pass 5 Pass Test Case ID: 0 Bill – Test Case Title: T Eric – Test Case Conditions: A Kong – Test Date: 11/12/2015 Description: Step Test Description Expected Result Actual Result Notes Status (Pass/Fail) 1 Pass 2 Pass 3 Pass 4 Pass 5 Pass