20. Stand tall and check
@stellacollins
www.stellarlearning.co.uk
Editor's Notes
I’m stella collins of stellar learning
Excited by neuroscience and love l&D
No – it’s a brain
Currently all fascinated by brains
Lots of neuroscience around – how many brains / neuroscience ideas have you seen in conference exhibition?
Thousands of books alone
L&D
Economic
Sports
Marketing
Business
Even dogs
Brain scans look great – we love them – easy to use to sell ideas
what exactly do they tell us? – hard to understand – leads to dangers
Dangers
esp neuro-sceptics – rightly concerned about people using it incorrectly - They’re right – we don’t understand it all in detail
We may feel undermined – lose confidence
Danger of seduction of neuromyths – new neuromyths appearing al the time
Neuro hype – people will get bored –but it’s useful as evidence for what we do well
Dangers – we don’t usually learn in this environment
Neuroscientists look at tiny part of picture – L&D operate in real world
Not the full story - holiday snaps - reductionist
expert in wider field
Many infuences
experience -– what L&D are doing in real world
multi faceted - approach
Don’t throw baby out
Don’t stop doing good well tested learning because no obvious evidence
Don’t throw the neuroscience out just because its hard or you think it’s a fad – it’s useful
Do Have a good look
Use it to shape your own practice and find evidence to back what you know works
Experiment with new ideas
Learning and science involve challenging
Experimenting
Changing ideas/ beliefs/ practise
Asking questions – checking
We need to be prepared to do that
assess what’s good and what’s hype
Blinding with science - It’s confusing – helps to have a guide through the maze
6 questions – not standalone but together can help identify what’s valuable neuroscience vs hype
University / respected institute/ jo bloggs co ltd
Major institutions can get it wrong- but just ask – to get bigger picture
Pure research – doesn’t exist –
Products to sell
Sponsorship
What else
Respected peer reviewed doc – caveats and conditions explained
Or the dailies – very distilled and simplified
20 year old research may be well evidenced –– or a blip
Last weeks research – exciting but no time to replicate
Double blind experiment?
Statistics? Complex analysis
Study size – typically small
Peer reviewed
Magic bullet or another piece in the puzzle – magic bullet not v reliable
Real scientists use very cautious language
When faced with neurohype
Stand tall - be proud of what you know –
Challenge neuroscience research and learn from it – knowing you’re an expert in your own field