Mental Workload at Transitions between Multiple Devices in Personal Information Management

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Mental Workload at Transitions between Multiple Devices in Personal Information Management - Presentation Transcript

    1. Mental Workload at Transitions between Multiple Devices in Personal Information Management Manas Tungare & Manuel Pérez-Quiñones
    2. Highlights from Mental Workload at Transitions between Multiple Devices in Personal Information Management Manas Tungare & Manuel Pérez-Quiñones
    3. Personal information, Multiple devices
    4. Problem Domain • Is there a difference in mental workload when users perform tasks using multiple devices? • Increased perception of task difficulty? • Does switching to alternate strategies result in lower workload?
    5. Mental workload • [...] “that portion of operator information processing capacity or resources that is actually required to meet system demands.” [O’Donnell and Eggemeier, 1986] • Subjective measure: NASA Task Load Index (TLX) • Physiological measure: Task-Evoked Pupillary Response (TEPR)
    6. Experiment design Files Calendar Contacts Participant Code: Date: Treatment: Session: W T 2009S January 5 to January 11, 2009 January 2009 February M T W T F S S M T F S Home Calendar 1 2 3 4 1 Week 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 January 2009 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 PIM Study - Home Monday 5 Tuesday 6 Wednesday 7 Thursday 8 Friday 9 Saturday 10 Sunday 11 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM Participant Code: Date: Treatment: Session: W T 2009S January 5 to January 11, 2009 January 2009 February 11 AM M T W T F S S M T F S Home Calendar 1 2 3 4 1 Week 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NOON 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Level 0 January 2009 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 1 PM 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 PIM Study - Home 2 PM Team Outing Monday 5 Tuesday 6 Wednesday 7 Thursday 8 Friday 9 Saturday 10 Sunday 11 3 PM 8 AM 4 PM Dentist's appoint! ment 9 AM 5 PM 10 AM 6 PM Michael's Little League game (tenta! 11 AM 7 PM tive; confirm with Alex) NOON 8 PM 1 PM 9 PM 2 PM Team Outing Page 1/1 3 PM 4 PM Dentist's appoint! ment 5 PM 6 PM Michael's Little League game (tenta! 7 PM tive; confirm with Alex) 8 PM 9 PM Page 1/1 No support for Multiple paper No support for le migration calendars synchronization Level 1 System supports Devices support Online calendars le migration synchronization
    7. Files task, L0 — TEPR B B B 20 L0 L1 AB AB AB ! ! 10 ! A Adjusted Pupil Radius A ! A ! 0 ! ! ! ! Transition Step −0 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    8. Calendar task — TEPR Not signi cant L0 L1 20 Adjusted Pupil Radius 10 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! −0 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Step within Task
    9. Contacts task — TEPR 0.00623 0.01158 0.0224 0.03476 0.007127 L0 L1 0.04138 25 20 Adjusted Pupil Radius 15 ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! 5 ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 − 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Step within Task
    10. Files L0: Migration Step Files Task, Participant P8, Level L1 30 Migration Step 20 Migration Step Pupil Radius (eye image pixels) 10 0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 −0 1 −0 2 −0 3 200 400 600 800
    11. Files L0: Migration Step Files Task, Participant P18, Level L0 30 20 Pupil Radius (eye image pixels) 10 0 S0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9S10 −0 1 Migration Step −0 2 −0 3 200 400 600 800 1000
    12. Files — Time 600 Without Sync Support With Sync Support 500 F(1,34)=8.8318 p=0.005404 400 Time Taken (s) 312 (276) 300 200 109 (83) ! 100 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    13. Calendar task — Time F(1,34)=4.1842 p=0.0486 Both 2 & 6 required Paper Calendar Online Calendar scheduling an event 80 ! F(1,34)=4.3345 p=0.04495 ! 60 ! ! Time Taken (s) ! 40 ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    14. Contacts task — Time No Sync Support Sync Support 150 ! Time Taken (s) ! 100 ! 50 ! ! ! ! 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
    15. Calendar task — TEPR, Time No Sync Support Sync Support 150 ! L0 L1 25 20 Time Taken (s) ! 100 Adjusted Pupil Radius 15 ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! 5 ! 50 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 − 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Step within Task Step # Same time, but higher workload in L0: More mental workload for same performance
    16. Workload — Time • TLX correlation signi cant only for Files. • No signi cant correlation between TEPR and time. • Need to evaluate both separately.
    17. TEPR: Files Files Level L0 Files Level L1 ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! 20 ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! 60 !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! 10 !! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! 40 !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Adjusted Pupil Radius Adjusted Pupil Radius !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! 0 ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! −0 ! ! ! !! ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! 0 ! ! ! ! ! −0 ! ! !! ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! −0 ! ! −0 3 ! ! 2 ! ! ! 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Time on Task (seconds) Time on Task (seconds) r=-0.062, p=0.46 r=0.15, p=0.06
    18. TEPR: Calendar Calendar Level L0 Calendar Level L1 60 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 40 ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! 40 ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Adjusted Pupil Radius Adjusted Pupil Radius ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! !! !!! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! 0 ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! !! !! ! !!!! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! 0 ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! −0 ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! −0 ! ! 2 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Time on Task (seconds) Time on Task (seconds) r=–-0.11, p=0.08 r=–0.067, p=0.28
    19. TEPR: Contacts Contacts Level L0 Contacts Level L1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 60 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! 40 ! ! ! ! Adjusted Pupil Radius Adjusted Pupil Radius ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! 0 !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! 20 ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! −0 ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! −0 2 50 100 150 200 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Time on Task (seconds) Time on Task (seconds) r=–0.013, p=0.18 r=0.415, p=0.68
    20. Mental Workload in PIM • Workload is a useful metric to understand PIM at a sub-task level. • Provides alternative to performance measurement (e.g. same performance but high workload.) • Continuous measure of workload provides important information about sub-tasks that subjective measures could not capture
    21. Holistic Usability • Computing is situated, cognition is distributed • ∴ Must evaluate tools & tasks in situ. • Device transitions are not designed well. • Traditional usability: effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction (ISO de nition)
    22. Future work: Hot Cognition • Maslow’s hierarchy applied to interaction: • 1: Function, 2: Usability, 3: Pleasure. • Usability is necessary, but not sufficient. • Emotion, pleasure, frustration, likability • Quality of life, Perceived ease of use/ usability metrics, happiness.
    23. Questions & comments ? !
    24. Questions & comments ? ! Thank you!

    + Manas TungareManas Tungare, 3 weeks ago

    custom

    113 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Knowledge workers increasingly use multiple devices more

    More info about this document

    CC Attribution-NonCommercial LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial License

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 113
      • 113 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories